
- •Contents
- •List of abbreviations
- •Preface
- •Introduction
- •Germanic languages
- •Classification of germanic languages
- •Ancient germanic tribes and their classification
- •Germanic alphabets
- •Some phonetic peculiarities of germanic languages
- •Consonants
- •The First Consonant Shift (Grimm’s Law)
- •Ііі. Act The ie aspirated voiced plosives bh, dh, gh changed in Gc to corresponding unaspirated plosives b, d, g, e.G.
- •Verner`s Law
- •Word – Stress
- •Stressed vowels
- •Germanic Fracture (Breaking)
- •Gradation or Ablaut
- •Unstressed Vowels
- •Grammatical peculiarities of germanic languages
- •The Noun
- •The Adjective
- •The Verb
- •Gothic Strong Verbs
- •Vocabulary
- •Old english
- •2.1. Periods in the History of English
- •2.2. Historical Background
- •2.2.1. The Roman Conquest of Britain
- •2.2.2. The Anglo-Saxon Conquest of Britain
- •2.3. Alphabet and Pronunciation
- •Old English Alphabet
- •2.4. Old English Dialects and Written Records
- •2.5. Some Phonetic Changes of the Old English Period
- •2.5.1. Vowels
- •2.5.2. Old English Breaking
- •2.5.3. Palatal Mutation (I-mutation)
- •Monophthongs
- •Diphthongs
- •2.5.4. Back or Velar Mutation (Velarization)
- •2.5.5. Diphthongization of Vowels after Palatal Consonants
- •2.5.6. Lengthening of Short Vowels
- •2.5.7. Unstressed Vowels
- •2.5.8. Consonants
- •2.5.9. Palatalization of Velar Consonants
- •2.5.10. Assimilation, Metathesis, Doubling of Consonants, Loss of Consonants
- •2.6. Old English Morphology
- •2.6.1. Old English Noun: General Characteristics
- •Vowel Stems
- •Consonant Stems
- •2.6.2. Vowel Stems Strong Declension
- •2.6.3. Consonant Stems: Weak Declension, Minor Declensions
- •2.6.4. Root-Stems
- •2.6.5. Pronouns
- •2.6.5.1. Personal Pronouns
- •2.6.5.2. Demonstrative Pronouns
- •Declension of the Demonstrative Pronoun þes
- •2.6.6. Adjectives
- •2.6.6.1. Strong Declension of Adjectives
- •2.6.6.2. Weak Declension of Adjectives
- •2.6.6.3. Degrees of Comparison
- •2.6.7. Adverbs
- •2.6.7.1. Formation of Adverbs
- •2.6.7.2. Comparison of Adverbs
- •2.6.8. The Verb: General Characteristics
- •Conjugation of verbs
- •2.6.8.1. Strong Verbs
- •2.6.8.2. Weak Verbs
- •Conjugation of Weak Verbs
- •2.6.8.3. Preterite-Present Verbs
- •Conjugation of Preterite - Present verbs
- •2.6.8.4. Anomalous verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb dōn
- •Indicative mood
- •2.6.8.5. Suppletive Verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon
- •Indicative mood
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān
- •Indicative mood
- •2.7. Old English Syntax
- •2.8. The Old English Vocabulary
- •2.8.1. Word-Building
- •Suffixation
- •Prefixation
- •Composition
- •2.8.2. Borrowings
- •Latin borrowings
- •Celtic Borrowings
- •Middle english
- •3.1. Historical Background
- •3.1.1. Scandinavian Invasions
- •3.1.2. The Norman Conquest
- •3.2. Middle English Dialects Rise of the London Dialect
- •3.3. Early Middle English Written Records
- •3.4. Word Stress
- •3.5. Vowels
- •3.5.1. Unstressed Vowels
- •3.5.2. Stressed vowels
- •3.5.2.1. Quantitative Vowel Changes
- •3.5.2.2. Qualitative Vowel Changes
- •Monophthongs
- •3.5.2.3. Monophthongization of Old English Diphthongs
- •3.5.2.4. Rise of New Diphthongs
- •3.6. Evolution of Consonants in Middle English
- •3.7. Spelling Changes in Middle English
- •3.7.1. Changes in the Designation of Vowels
- •3.7.2. Changes in the designation of Consonants
- •3.8. Changes in the Grammatical System
- •3.8.1. Preliminary Remarks
- •3.8.2. The Noun
- •3.8.2.1. Gender
- •3.8.2.2. Number
- •3.8.2.3. Decay of Noun Declensions
- •3.8.3. The Adjective
- •3.8.3.1. Declension of Adjectives in Late Middle English
- •3.8.3.2. Degrees of Comparison
- •3.8.4. Adverbs
- •3.8.4.1. Formation of Adverbs
- •3.8.4.2. Comparison of Adverbs
- •3.8.5. The Pronoun
- •3.8.5.1. Personal Pronouns
- •3.8.5.2. Possessive pronouns
- •3.8.5.3. Demonstrative Pronouns
- •3.8.5.4. Rise of the Articles
- •3.8.6. The Verb: General Characteristics
- •Conjugation of Verbs
- •Conjugation of Verbs Past Indicative
- •3.8.5.1. Changes in the Morphological Classes of Verbs in Middle English and Early New English
- •3.8.6.1. Strong Verbs
- •3.8.6.2. Weak Verbs
- •3.8.6.3. Preterite-present Verbs
- •3.8.6.4. Suppletive verbs
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb bēon in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •Conjugation of the verb ʒān in Old English, Middle English and Early New English
- •3.8.6.5. Rise of Analytical Forms
- •Future Forms
- •Perfect Forms
- •Passive Forms
- •Continuous Forms
- •3.8.7. Development of the Syntactic System
- •3.9. Middle English Vocabulary Changes
- •3.9.1. Native Derivational Affixes
- •3.9.2. French Derivational Affixes
- •3.9.3. Scandinavian Borrowings
- •3.9.4. French Borrowings
- •New english
- •4.1. The formation of the English National Language
- •4.2. Changes in Pronunciation
- •4.2.1. Development of Unstressed Vowels
- •4.2.1.1. Loss of unstressed –e [ə]
- •4.2.1.2. Loss of Vowels in Intermediate Syllables
- •4.2.2. Stressed Vowels
- •4.2.2.1. The Great Vowel Shift
- •4.2.2.2. Shortening of Long Vowels
- •4.2.2.3. Development of Short Vowels
- •4.2.2.4. The Development of the New Short [л]
- •4.2.2.5. Changes in Diphthongs
- •4.2.2.6. Vowel Changes under the Influence of Consonants
- •4.2.3. Consonants
- •4.2.3.1. Voicing of Voiceless Consonants
- •4.2.3.2. Loss of Consonants Development of [X]
- •Simplification of Consonant Clusters
- •4.2.3.3. Change of [d] to [ð] when Close to [r]
- •4.2.3.4. Development of Sibilants and Affricates in Early New English
- •4.3. Changes in Spelling
- •4.4. Local Dialects in New English
- •4.4.1. Scottish Dialect
- •4.4.2. Northern Dialects
- •4.4.3. Western, Central and Southern Dialects
- •4.5. Some Essential Grammatical Changes of the New English Period: Morphology
- •4.5.1. The Noun
- •4.5.1.1. Number
- •4.5.1.2. Cases
- •4.5.2. The Pronoun
- •4.5.2.1. Personal Pronouns
- •4.5.2.2. Possessive Pronouns
- •4.5.3. The Adjective
- •4.5.4. The Adverb
- •4.5.5. The Verb
- •4.5.5.1. Personal Endings
- •4.5.5.2. Changes in Strong Verbs
- •4.5.5.3. Changes in Weak Verbs
- •4.5.5.4. Rise of Invariable Verbs
- •4.5.5.5. Changes in Preterite-Present Verbs
- •4.5.5.6. Irregular Verbs
- •4.6. New English Syntax
- •4.7. New English Vocabulary Changes
- •4.7.1. Latin Loanwords
- •4.7.2. Latinization of French Loanwords
- •4.7.3. Greek loanwords
- •4.7.4. French Loanwords
- •4.7.5. Mixed vocabulary of New English
- •4.7.6. Italian and Spanish Loanwords
- •4.7.7. Russian Loanwords
- •4.8. The Expansion of English
- •4.9. The English Language in the usa
- •4.9.1. Some peculiarities of American Pronunciation
- •4.9.2. American Spelling
- •4.9.3. Some peculiarities of American Grammar
- •4.9.4. Vocabulary of American English
- •Conclusion
- •Bibliography
3.5.2.3. Monophthongization of Old English Diphthongs
All OE diphthongs were monophthongized as early as the XI c., losing their second elements. As the result of this change, the vowel sysem lost two sets of diphthongs, long and short.
As OE short ea represented something like [æə], it developed into a, e.g. OE eald > ME ald (old).
OE long ēa was reduced to , e.g. OE ēast > ME eest (east).
OE short eo changed into e, e.g.
OE heorte > ME herte (heart), OE steorra > ME sterre (star).
OE ēo > ME long closed (often spellt ee), e.g.
OE cēosan > ME ch sen, OE dēop > ME deep, OE dēor > ME deer.
3.5.2.4. Rise of New Diphthongs
As the result of the vocalization of [j], [] and [w] (that is, their change into vowels) five new diphthongs were formed whose second element was either [ı] (written i, y) or [u] (mostly written w). These diphthongs developed as the result of the following processes: (1) The palatal fricative ʒ [j] developed into [i], (2) The velar fricative ʒ [] first developed into [w] and then into [u], (3) The bilabial [w] developed into [u].
The palatal consonant yielded diphthongs in -i, the velar one – diphthongs in -w.
(1) Diphthongs in -i include:
[ai < æʒ] (written ai, ay), e.g.
OE dæʒ > ME dai, day;
[ei < eʒ, ēʒ] (written ei, ey), e.g.
OE weʒ > ME wei, wey, OE ʒrēʒ > ME grei, grey
(2) Diphthongs in -w include:
[au < aʒ] (written aw), e.g.
OE laʒu > ME lawe;
[ou < āʒ] (written ow, ou), e.g.
OE āʒen > ME own, OE þōhte > ME thoughte;
[eu < ēow, ēaw] (written ew), e.g.
OE cnēow > ME knew, OE fēawe > ME fewe.
Note 1. The diphthong [au] occurred also in some French borrowings (sometimes before a nasal, in imitation to Anglo-Norman pronunciation), e.g. cause, pause, faute, straunge.
Note 2. After a vowel followed by the voiceless spirant h a glide developed between them, and the diphthong [ou] arose: brōhte > broughte, dāh > dough.
Note 3. Some linguists are of the opinion that the French long [ū] was replaced by the diphthong [eu] in those areas where OE y [ü] was not preserved, i.e. everywhere but the South-West, e.g.
fruit was pronounced [freut] in ME, due – [deu]. This is the reason why ME trewe < OE trēowe has come to be written true and the pronunciation of dew and due is the same.
Besides the above-mentioned diphthongs it is necessary to mention the diphthong [oi], mostly found in French borrowings like point (point), vois (voice), poison.
3.6. Evolution of Consonants in Middle English
In ME, the opposition of velar consonants to palatal (k – k΄ g – g΄) disappeared. From OE palatal plosives k΄, g΄ (which had split from the corresponding velar plosives k and g in Early OE) and the consonant cluster «sc» three new phonemes arose: [t, ʤ, ]. Under the influence of the French tradition they began to be indicated by special letters, digraphs and trigraphs: ch, tch, g, dg, sh, ssh, sch.
OE palatal [k΄] developed into the affricate [t] initially before front vowels, medially before i and finally after i, e.g.
OE cild > ME child, OE cirice > ME chirche (church), OE ic > ME ich.
Variants with velar «k» also survived: (a) in the Northern dialects and in the Northern Midlands (presumably due to Scandinavian influence in those areas), e.g. kirk (church), birk (birch), ik (I). (b) The preservation of velar k in the verbs sēken (seek) (< OE sēcan), thinken (< OE þyncan) and thenken (think) < OE þencan may be due to to the influence of the short forms of the second and third persons, sg, present, indicative: sēcst, sēcþ, þēncst, þyncþ where the consonant was followed by another consonant.
The OE cluster sc changed into [ ], e.g.
OE scip > ME ship, OE sceal > ME shal.
The OE long consonant [g΄] denoted by cʒdeveloped into the voiced affricate [ʤ], e.g.
OE brycʒ > ME bridge, OE ecʒ > ME edge.
The affricates [t], [ʤ] also came from a different source: they entered the English language in loanwords from French, e.g.
charme [tarm], gentil [ʤentil] in Anglo-Norman pronunciation.
Some consonants were lost in consonant clusters, e.g.
the initial [h] was lost before r, l, n, e.g.
OE hlāford > ME lord, OE hnutu > ME nute, OE hrinʒ > ME ring.
Before [w] the sound [h] remained longer, especially in the North where OE [hw] came to be written quh or qwh. In the South [h] was dropped before [w] in Late ME, and the combination wh was substituted for hw, e.g.
OE hwæt > ME quhat [xwat] – in the North, what [wat] – in the South. You can still hear the pronunciation [xw] in Northern dialects.
Final «n» was often lost in unstressed syllables, eg.
OE brinʒan > ME bringe(n) (bring)
Medial [v] was often dropped before consonants, e.g.
OE hæfde > ME had
In the forms of the past tense and past participle, the verb māken lost the sound [k], e.g.
ME mākede – mākde – made, ME māked – mākd – mad.