Заняття 14

Тема: Злочини і покарання. Смертна кара. За чи проти.

Тип заняття: комбінований

Вид заняття: лекція-семінар

Мета: спонукати студентів до висловлювання іноземною мовою шляхом постановки проблемних питань, практикувати навички усного мовлення іноземною мовою, повторити, закріпити і активізувати лексичний матеріал щодо теми, удосконалювати навички вживання граматичних структур і лексичних одиниць у мовленні, розвивати вміння сприйняття мовлення на слух, ігноруючи незнайомі слова, розвивати мовну здогадку, уяву; розвивати почуття необхідності вивчення іноземної мови для спілкування, формувати терпиме ставлення до співрозмовника, який висловлює протилежну думку, вміння знаходити компроміс.

Обладнання: роздатковий матеріал, малюнки, аудіоматеріал

Міжпредметні зв’язки: ПР

Хід заняття:

І. Організаційний момент: (організація роботи у групі, повідомлення теми, мети, плану заняття)

2. Введення у іншомовне середовище

- аудіювання 4 частини детективної історії Seaside Mystery (track 42, disk 2 )

Seaside Mystery: Part 4

1. Are the following statements True or False?

1 Mrs King is Peter's landlady.

2 Yoshiko is late for Mr McCabe's class.

3 Yoshiko sees Mrs King at breakfast.

4 Mrs King is on the beach with Mr McCabe.

5 Yoshiko returns to school with Carlos and Peter.

2. These words will help you to anderstand the text properly:

crying taking reason park lake immediately shouting in trouble kill gun angry idea police bridge finding find out

3. Answer the following questions:

1 Who phones Peter?

2 Who writes a letter to Yoshiko?

3 What does Mrs King want Yoshiko to do?

4 Where is Carlos?

5 Where is Mrs King?

6 Who is she with?

4. Match the pictures with the sentences:

1) Yoshiko takes Mrs King home.

2) Yoshiko speaks to Peter on the phone.

3) Carlos sees the young man running over the bridge.

4) Yoshiko and Peter go to the station.

5) Carlos and Peter run after Mrs Kings son.

6) Peter and Yoshiko meet in the park.

3. Перевірка домашнього завдання

• переказ тексту

3. Закріплення матеріалу, повідомлення нової теми

• ознайомлення з точками зору щодо смертної кари

1/Taking an offenders’ life is more severe punishment than any prison term, it must be better deterrent. 2/ “Whosever sheds (to shed - проливати) man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed”. 3/”Let the punishment fit the crime ” 4/ The murders deserve (заслуговує) to die. 5/ The society has the right to kill in defence of its members, just as the individual may kill in self-defence. 6/ “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” 7/Those who kill should be deprived (позбавляти) of their own lives.

1/States, in which one has a death penalty and the other does not, show no significant (значний) difference in the murder rate. 2/ States that use the death penalty seem to have a higher number of homicides (вбивство) than states that do not use it. 3/ States that abolish and then reintroduce (поновити) the death penalty do not seem to show any significant change in the murder rate. 4/ The capital is often used unfairly: women are rarely sentenced to death; a disproportionate (невиправдано великий) number of non-whites are sentenced to death and executed; poor defendants with inexperienced attorney (захисник, юрист) are most likely to be sentenced to death. 5/ There are many mistakes in legal practice (miscarriage of justice) 6/”It is much more prudent (благоразумный) to acquit two persons, though actually (дійсний) guilty, than to pass a sentence of condemnation (осудження) on one that is virtuous (добродетельный) and innocent” Voltaire 7/”An evil deed is not redeemed (окупити) by an evil deed of retaliation (возмездие)” C.S. King

Інформація для викладача:

In the U.S. those who argue against the death penalty as a deterrent (стримуючий фактор) to crime cite (посилатися) the following: (1) Adjacent (суміжні, розташовані поряд) states, in which: one has a death penalty and the other does not, show no significant differences in the murder rate; (2) states that use the death penalty seem to have a higher number of homicides than states that do not use it; (3) states that abolish and then reintroduce the death penalty do not seem to show any significant change in the murder rate.

• читання і обговорення основних позицій щодо смертної кари (за запитанням: Are you against or for using capital punishment in the country):

The fundamental questions raised by the death penalty are whether it is an effective deterrent to violent crime, and whether it is more effective than the alternative of long-term imprisonment

DEFENDERS of the death penalty insist that because taking an offender's life is a more severe punishment than any prison term, it must be the better deterrent. DEFENDERS of capital punishment have also claimed that society has the right to kill in defence of its members, just as the individual may kill in self-defence.

OPPONENTS say that the death penalty can be the result of a mistake in practice and that it is impossible to administer fairly. The chief objection to capital punishment has been that it is always used unfairly, in at least three major ways. First, women are rarely sentenced to death and executed, even though 20 per cent of all homicides in recent years have been committed by women. Second, a disproportionate (непропорційно) number of non-whites are sentenced to death and executed. Third, poor and friendless defendants, those with inexperienced or court-appointed attorney, are most likely to be sentenced to death and executed.

Студенти займають позицію і вибирають речення на захист своєї думки. Зорієнтувати студентів для використання наступних фраз:

I agree with … to a certain extent

That’s quite true, but…

I see what you mean but …

I don’t agree with …

I can’t help thinking the same.

That’s right.

Not really

That’s not the way I see it.

No way.

My personal opinion is ….

I can see no reason to oppose.

In my opinion…

As I see it

Personally, I think …

From my point of you…

Frankly, I think …