Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

10.1111@pace.13216

.pdf
Скачиваний:
8
Добавлен:
12.02.2018
Размер:
1.04 Mб
Скачать

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of NYHA Class I-II and III patients

Clinical Characteristics

NYHA I-II

NYHA III

P-value

 

 

 

 

Number of Patients, #

706

780

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment A (n, %)

251(36)

256(33)

0.267

 

 

 

 

Treatment B (n, %)

228(32)

267(34)

0.429

 

 

 

 

Treatment C (n, %)

227(32)

257(33)

0.744

 

 

 

 

CRT-D (n, %)

165(23)

591(76)

<.001

 

 

 

 

Age at Time of Consent, years (mean ± SD)

62±12

64±12

<.001

 

 

 

 

Female (n, %)

159(23)

270(35)

<.001

 

 

 

 

Ejection Fraction, % (mean ± SD)

27±6

25±7

0.006

 

 

 

 

Ischemic (n, %)

424(60)

353(45)

<.001

 

 

 

 

Diabetes Mellitus (n, %)

201(29)

280(36)

0.002

 

 

 

 

Hypertension (n, %)

458(65)

559(72)

0.005

 

 

 

 

Currently Smoking (n, %)

130(20)

115(15)

0.033

 

 

 

 

Atrial Fibrillation (n, %)

77(11)

73(9)

0.302

 

 

 

 

Atrial Flutter (n, %)

18(3)

18(2)

0.762

 

 

 

 

Treatment for Atrial Arrhythmias (n, %)

75(80)

69(68)

0.054

 

 

 

 

Ablation for Atrial Arrhythmias (n, %)

20(21)

14(14)

0.185

 

 

 

 

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

21

Clinical Characteristics

NYHA I-II

NYHA III

P-value

 

 

 

 

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (n, %)

180(26)

185(24)

0.425

 

 

 

 

Myocardial Infarction, (n, %)

350(51)

275(36)

<.001

 

 

 

 

Resting Heart Rate, bpm (mean ± SD)

70.9±12.5

73.2±12.5

<.001

 

 

 

 

Amiodarone (n, %)

32(5)

63(8)

0.005

 

 

 

 

ACE Inhibitor/ARB (n, %)

496(70)

506(65)

0.029

 

 

 

 

Beta-blocker (n, %)

671(95)

719(92)

0.031

 

 

 

 

Aldosterone (n, %)

233(33)

307(39)

0.010

 

 

 

 

Diuretic (n, %)

421(60)

580(74)

<.001

 

 

 

 

Statins (n, %)

433(61)

435(56)

0.032

 

 

 

 

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

22

Table 2: Multivariable models for risk of all inappropriate therapy associated with

NYHA Class III vs. Class II patients with ICD and CRT-D in Arm A

A. Inappropriate ICD therapy

Parameter

Hazard Ratio*

95% CI

p-value

 

 

 

 

End point: All inappropriate therapy (101 events)

 

 

 

 

ICD patients

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NYHA III vs. NYHA I-II

2.55

1.51

– 4.30

<0.001

 

 

 

 

 

CRT-D patients

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NYHA III vs. NYHA I-II

3.73

1.14

– 12.23

0.030

 

 

 

 

 

*Models adjusted for age, diabetes, and prior atrial arrhythmias

B. Inappropriate ATP

Parameter

Hazard Ratio*

95% CI

p-value

 

 

 

 

End point: All inappropriate therapy (100 events)

ICD patients

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

23

NYHA III vs. NYHA I-II

2.57

1.52

– 4.34

<0.001

 

 

 

 

 

CRT-D patients

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NYHA III vs. NYHA I-II

3.62

1.10

– 11.90

0.034

 

 

 

 

 

*Models adjusted for age, diabetes, and prior atrial arrhythmias

C. Inappropriate therapy for HR<200 bpm

Parameter

Hazard Ratio*

95% CI

p-value

 

 

 

 

End point: All inappropriate therapy (100 events)

ICD patients

NYHA III vs. NYHA I-II

2.89

 

1.69

– 4.94

<0.001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CRT-D patients

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NYHA III vs. NYHA I-II

3.32

 

1.01

– 10.95

0.049

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Models adjusted for age, diabetes, and prior atrial arrhythmias

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. 24

Table 3: Multivariable models for risk of all inappropriate therapy with novel vs.

conventional ICD programming in NYHA Class III and NYHA Class I-II patients

Parameter

Hazard Ratio*

95% CI

p-value

 

 

 

 

End point: All inappropriate therapy in NYHA III patients (72 events)

 

 

 

 

Arm B vs. Arm A

0.08

0.03 – 0.18

<0.001

 

 

 

 

Arm C vs. Arm A

0.17

0.09 – 0.32

<0.001

 

 

 

 

End point: All inappropriate therapy in NYHA I-II patients (74 events)

 

 

 

 

Arm B vs. Arm A

0.25

0.13 – 0.46

<0.001

 

 

 

 

Arm C vs. Arm A

0.28

0.15 – 0.52

<0.001

 

 

 

 

Models adjusted for ICD vs. CRT-D, age, diabetes, and prior atrial arrhythmias

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. 25

Соседние файлы в предмете Аритмология