Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Учебники / Lasers in Otorhinolaryngology Huttenbrink

.pdf
Скачиваний:
218
Добавлен:
07.06.2016
Размер:
7.17 Mб
Скачать

70 Lasers in Rhinology

nostic step, the increased uptake of protoporphyrin IX in

rates ranging from 50 % to 100 % have been reported in

the papilloma cells is used for fluorescent endoscopy of the

the literature [196]. Based on available data, however, it

nose and paranasal sinuses (Fig. 3.13). The mucosal areas

is reasonable to conclude that PDT with ALA is now an

affected by papillomatosis are clearly visualized by fluores-

effective alternative in the treatment of actinic keratosis,

cent endoscopy [193]. Since the 635-nm excitation beam

superficial basal cell carcinoma, and Bowen’s disease

has but a shallow penetration depth, the papillomas are ini-

[206]. Essential advantages of PDT are its excellent cos-

tially removed by excision or ablation with a surgical laser.

metic and functional results and lack of invasiveness. Due

A biopsy sample is taken at this time for histologic confir-

to the lack of histologic control, PDT is not currently rec-

mation. PDT is carried out after all papillomas have been

ommended for the treatment of invasive squamous cell

grossly removed and the carbonaceous debris has been

carcinoma [205].

wiped away. The wound bed and adjacent mucosa are ir-

 

radiated with laser light delivered through fibers with a

T Summary and Outlook

low-divergent output, applying a total energy dose of

100 J/cm2. To date, three patients have been successfully

In the past few decades, laser surgery has evolved into an

treated according to this protocol.

 

important therapeutic modality in otorhinolaryngology. At

Extranasal Photodynamic Therapy

many institutions, CO2 laser surgery has become the meth-

od of choice for resecting localized carcinomas of the upper

Resection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the ex-

aerodigestive tract. A number of laser systems have been

successfully used in treating various diseases of the nose

ternal nose and adjacent facial skin is problematic from a

and paranasal sinuses, but laser therapy cannot yet be con-

functional and esthetic standpoint. Plastic reconstructive

sidered an established modality for many disorders. Espe-

options are limited, especially in patients with recurrent

cially in rhinologic applications, lasers offer several advan-

disease after surgery or radiotherapy and patients with

tages over conventional techniques such as improved vis-

multifocal disease. Given this situation, PDT represents a

ualization due to better hemostasis, high-precision tissue

valuable alternative treatment.

ablation, minimal collateral tissue trauma resulting in less

PDT with systemically administered hematoporphyrin de-

postoperative edema, and a reduction in postoperative

pain. Intranasal packing, which is often difficult for pa-

rivatives has yielded good oncologic and cosmetic results

tients to tolerate, can be omitted in many cases.

in the treatment of localized, superficial basal cell carcino-

 

mas and spindle cell carcinomas. One disadvantage of this

Given the rich vascularity of the nasal mucosa and the

photosensitizer is that it photosensitizes the skin for a pe-

proximity of vulnerable structures such as the orbit and

riod of weeks, which can significantly affect the patient’s

skull base, lasers used for intranasal surgery must meet

quality of life [194].

certain requirements. Ideally, the laser should be equally

Generalized photosensitization in PDT can be avoided by

effective in ablating bone and mucosa. It should provide

good hemostasis, cause no collateral damage, and should

the topical administration of ALA [195]. A 10–20 % ALA

be deliverable through a flexible carrier. The laser systems

cream or gel is applied to the skin lesion and then covered

used in rhinology (argon, KTP, diode, Nd:YAG, Ho:YAG,

with an occlusive dressing for 4–6 hours. Excitation of the

Er:YAG, CO2) meet the above criteria only to a degree, but

tumor with blue light (370–440 nm) induces a typical red

very good therapeutic results can still be achieved when

fluorescence that delineates the tumor boundaries. The tu-

the biophysical effects of the various lasers are taken into

mor area is then lased at a wavelength of 600–800 nm, ap-

account. We feel that laser therapy has an established place

plying a total dose of 100–150 J/cm2 [196]. Patients con-

in the treatment of turbinate hyperplasia, recurrent

sistently report a sunburn-like pain during laser applica-

epistaxis including Osler disease, hemangiomas and vascu-

tion [197]. No side effects besides erythema of the treated

lar malformations, choanal atresia, circumscribed benign

area have been described [198].

lesions, and rhinophyma. Lasers are still questionable as a

The successful PDT of premalignant and malignant lesions

tool for nasal septal and sinus surgery and intranasal lac-

rimal duct surgery, but good results can be achieved by an

with topically administered ALA was first described in

experienced surgeon in carefully selected patients.

1990 by Kennedy et al. [195]. Studies in recent years have

 

reported cure rates of 79–100 % for superficial basal cell

Further technical advances in laser systems may help to

carcinomas [195, 197, 199–203]. Much less favorable re-

expand the range of indications for laser use in rhinology.

sults have been reported for thicker lesions and nodular

This potential is illustrated by computer-assisted laser sys-

forms [199, 202, 203]. Actinic keratosis, which progresses

tems, which precisely define the area of tissue ablation

to squamous cell carcinoma in up to 60 % of cases, and Bo-

while sparing adjacent structures. In addition, manufactur-

wen’s disease can also be successfully treated with local

ers are developing laser devices for clinical use that com-

ALA PDT. The cure rates after one treatment range from

bine multiple wavelengths in one unit, resulting in cost

70 % to 90 % [202–206]. Actinic keratosis of the facial skin

savings and enabling the physician to select the optimum

responds considerably better to PDT than similar lesions

wavelength for a particular disease. Interest is also focus-

on the trunk or extremities [204].

ing on ways to develop better flexible carriers for the CO2

Since the treatments practiced at different centers are by

laser. Although the CO2 laser is the workhorse of otolaryn-

gology, bulky carriers still limit its capacity for endonasal

no means standardized, it is little wonder that response

use.

 

 

 

References 71

 

 

 

 

T Acknowledgements

22 von Glass W, Hauerstein T. Wound healing in the nose and

 

paranasal sinuses after irradiation with the argon laser. Arch

 

 

 

Otorhinolaryngol 1988; 245: 36–41

The author expresses thanks to Mr. M. Schmidt for his help

23

Lenz H. Acht Jahre Laserchirurgie an den unteren Nasen-

 

muscheln bei Rhinopathia vasomotorica in Form der Laser-

in processing the digital image data, Prof. Dr. J. A. Werner

 

 

strichkarbonisation. HNO 1985; 33: 422–425

for critically reviewing the manuscript, and the Karl Storz

24

Kunachak S, Kulapaditharom B, Prakunhungsit S. Minimally in-

company for its support in the printing of the color illus-

 

vasive KTP laser treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis: a pre-

trations.

25

liminary report. J Otolaryngol 2000; 29: 139–143

 

 

Olthoff A, Martin A, Liebmann F. Nd:YAG-Laserbehandlung der

 

 

 

unteren Nasenmuscheln im Kontaktverfahren bei der hyper-

T References

 

reflektorischen und allergischen Rhinopathie. Laryngorhino-

 

otologie 1999; 78: 240–243

 

 

26 Lippert BM, Werner JA. Nd:YAG-laserlichtinduzierte Nasen-

1

Lippert BM, Werner JA, Rudert H. Laser tissue effects with re-

 

muschelreduktion. Laryngorhinootologie 1996; 75: 523–528

 

gard to otorhinolaryngology. Otolaryngol Pol 1994; 48: 505–

27

Johnson LP. Nasal and paranasal sinus applications of lasers. In:

 

513

 

Davis RK (Hrsg). Lasers in Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Sur-

2

Lenz H, Eichler J, Knof J, Salk J, Schäfer G. Endonasales Ar+-La-

 

gery, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990: 145–155

 

ser-Strahlführungssystem und erste klinische Anwendungen

28

Jovanovic S, Dokic D. Die Nd:YAG-Laserchirurgie in der Behan-

 

bei der Rhinopathia vasomotorica. Laryngorhinootologie 1977;

 

dlung der allergischen Rhinitis. Laryngorhinootologie 1995;

 

56: 749–755

 

74: 419–422

3

Oswal V, Hopf JUG, Hopf M, Scherer H. Endonasal laser appli-

29

Ohyama M, Yamashita K, Furuta S, Nobori T, Daikuzono N. Ap-

 

cations. In: Oswal V, Remacle M (Hrsg). Principles and practice

 

plications of the Nd:YAG Laser in Otorhinolaryngology. In: Joffe

 

of lasers in otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery.

 

SN, Oguro Y (Hrsg.). Advances in Nd:YAG Laser Surgery. Berlin,

 

The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications, 2002; 163–

 

Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1988: 156–165

 

186

30

Lippert BM. Experimentelle und klinische Untersuchungen zur

4

Metson R. Holmium:YAG laser endoscopic sinus surgery: a ran-

 

biophysikalischen Wirkung und klinischen Anwendbarkeit

 

domized controlled study. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 1–18

 

verschiedener Lasersysteme im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Aachen:

5

Levine HL. Endoscopy and the KTP/532 laser for nasal sinus dis-

 

Shaker, 1998

 

ease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 46–51

31

Lippert BM, Werner JA, Hoffmann P, Rudert H. CO2- und

6

Lippert BM, Werner JA. Photodynamische Therapie in der HNO-

 

Nd:YAG-Laser-Vergleich zweier Verfahren zur Nasen-

 

Heilkunde. In: Szeimies RM, Jocham D, Landthaler M (Hrsg).

 

muschelreduktion. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1992; Suppl. II:

 

Klinische Fluoreszenzdiagnostik und Photodynamische Thera-

 

116–117

 

pie. Berlin: Blackwell, 2002: 236–251

32

Vagnetti A, Gobbi E, Algieri GM, D‘Ambrosio L. Wedge turbinec-

7

Hopf JUG, Hopf M, Koffroth-Becker C. Minimal invasive Chirur-

 

tomy: a new combined photocoagulative Nd:YAG laser tech-

 

gie obstruktiver Erkrankungen der Nase mit dem Diodenlaser.

 

nique. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1034–1036

 

Lasermedizin 1998/99; 14: 106–115

33

Tauber St, Janda P, Sroka R, Grevers G, Leunig A. Der Dioden-

8

Werner JA, Rudert H. Der Einsatz des Nd-YAG-Lasers in der

 

und Ho:YAG-Laser zur Mukotomie bei Nasenmuschelhyper-

 

Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde. HNO 1992; 40: 248–258

 

plasie: eine klinische Bewertung, HNO 1999; 47: 338

9

Sroka R, Rosler P, Janda P, Grevers G, Leunig A. Endonasal laser

34

Lippert BM, Werner JA. Long-term results after laser turbinec-

 

surgery with a new laser fiber guidance instrument. Laryngo-

 

tomy. Lasers Surg Med 1998; 22: 126–134

 

scope 2000; 110: 332–334

35

Min YG, Kim HS, Yun YS, Kim CS, Jang YJ, Jung TG. Contact laser

10

Lippert BM, Werner JA. Die Behandlung der hypertrophen un-

 

turbinate surgery for the treatment of idiopathic rhinitis. Clin

 

teren Nasenmuschel, Teil I. HNO 2000; 48: 170–181

 

Otolaryngol 1996; 21: 533–536

11

Hol MK, Huizing EH. Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology:

36

Janda P, Sroka R, Betz CS, Grevers G, Leunig A. Die Laserkon-

 

a review and critical evaluation of the different techniques.

 

chotomie mit Ho:YAG und Dioden-Laser zur Behandlung von

 

Rhinology 2000; 38: 157–166

 

hyperplastischen Nasenmuscheln. Laryngorhinootologie 2002;

12

Lippert BM, Werner JA. Die Behandlung der hypertrophen un-

 

81: 484–490

 

teren Nasenmuschel, Teil II. HNO 2000; 48: 267–274

37

DeRowe A, Landsberg R, Leonov Y, Katzir A, Ophir D. Subjective

13

Janda P, Sroka R, Baumgartner R, Grevers G, Leunig A. Laser

 

comparison of Nd:YAG, diode, and CO2 lasers for endoscopical-

 

treatment of hyperplastic inferior nasal turbinates: a review.

 

ly guided inferior turbinate reduction surgery. Am J Rhino

 

Lasers Surg Med 2001; 28: 404–413

 

1998; 12: 209–212

14

Levine HL. The potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser for treat-

38

Shapshay SM, Rebeiz EE, Bohigian RK. Holmium:Yttrium Alu-

 

ment of turbinate dysfunction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

 

minium Garnet Laser-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery:clini-

 

1991; 104: 247–251

 

cal experience. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 1177–1180

15

Wexler DB, Berger G, Derowe A, Ophir D. Long-term histologic

39

Serrano E, Percodani J, Yardeni E, Lombard L, Laffitte F, Pessey

 

effects of inferior turbinate laser surgery. Otolaryngol Head

 

JJ. The holmium:YAG laser for treatment of inferior turbinate

 

Neck Surg 2001; 124: 459–463

 

hypertrophy. Rhinology 1998; 38: 77–80

16

Selkin SG. Pitfalls in intranasal laser surgery and how to avoid

40

Leunig A, Janda P, Sroka R, Baumgartner R, Grevers G. Ho:YAG

 

them. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112: 285–289

 

laser treatment of hyperplastic inferior nasal turbinates. Laryn-

17

Emmerling O, di Martino E, Westhofen M. Ergebnisse der sub-

 

goscope 1999; 109: 1690–1695

 

mukösen Lasercochotomie mit dem Nd:YAG-Laser. HNO 1999;

41

Oswal VH, Bingham BJG. A pilot study of the Holmium YAG la-

 

47: 338

 

ser in nasal turbinale and tonsil surgery. J Clin Laser Med Surg

18

Langerholm S, Harsten G, Emgard P, Olsson B. Laser-turbinecto-

 

1992; 3: 211–216

 

my: long-term results. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113: 529–531

42

Elwany S, Harrison R. Inferior turbinectomy: comparison of

19

Englender M. Nasal laser mucotomy (L-mucotomy) of the inte-

 

four techniques. J Laryngol Otol 1990; 104: 206–209

 

rior turbinates. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109: 296–299

43

Fukutake T, Yamashita T, Tomoda K, Kumazawa T. Laser sur-

20

McCombe AW, Cook J, Jones AS. A comparison of laser cautery

 

gery for allergic rhinitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

 

and submucosal diathermy for rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 1992;

 

1986; 112: 1280–1282

 

17: 297–299

44

Papadakis CE, Skoulakis CE, Nikolidakis AA, Velegrakis GA, Bi-

21

Lenz H, Preußler H. Histologische Veränderungen des respira-

 

zakis JG, Helidonis ES. Swiftlase inferior turbinoplasty. Am J

 

torischen Schleimhautepithels der unteren Nasenmuscheln

 

Rhinol 1999; 13: 479–482

 

nach Argon-Laserstrichkarbonisation (Laser-Muschel-Kaustik)

45

Lippert BM, Werner JA. CO2 laser surgery of hypertrophied in-

 

bei Rhinopathia vasomotorica. Larynorhinootologie 1986; 65:

 

ferior turbinates, Rhinology 1997; 35: 33–36

 

438–444

46

Jähne M, Wöllmer W, Ussmüller J. Erste Anwendungen des

72 Lasers in Rhinology

 

Wave-Guide bei der CO2-laserchirurgischen Verkleinerung der

73

Ilgner J, Emmerling O, Biesterfeld S, Westhofen M. Clinical ex-

 

hyperplastischen Nasenmuscheln. Laryngorhinootologie 2002;

 

perience with power-regulated contact laser surgery for the

 

81: 289–292

 

paranasal sinuses and the anterior skull base. Laryngorhino-

47

Elwany S, Thabet H. Endoscopic carbon dioxide laser turbino-

 

otologie 2002; 81: 346–350

 

plasty. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 190–193

74

Qadir R, Kennedy D. Use of the holmium:yttrium aluminium

48

Elwany S, Abel Salaam S. Laser surgery for allergic rhinitis: the

 

garnet (ho:YAG) laser for cranial nerve decompression: an in

 

effect on seromucinous glands. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

 

vivo study using the rabbit model. Laryngoscope 1993; 103:

 

1999; 120: 742–744

 

631–636

49

Lippert BM, Werner JA. Comparison of carbon dioxide and neo-

75

Iro H, Waldfahrer F. Endonasale Tränenwegschirurgie aus

 

dymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet lasers in surgery of the in-

 

HNO-ärztlicher Sicht. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 613–616

 

ferior turbinate. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 1036–

76

Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Emmerich KH, Lüchtenberg M, Stein-

 

1042

 

hauer J. Endoskopische Laserdakryoplastik. Ophthalmologe

50

Takeno S, Osada R, Furukido K, Yajin K. Analysis of local cy-

 

1999; 96: 332–334

 

tokine gene expression in patients with allergic rhinitis treated

77

Toti A. Nuevo metodo conservatore de cura radicale delle sup-

 

with CO2-laser surgery. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1968–1974

 

purazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale (dacriocistorinostomia).

51

Testa B, Mesolella M, Squeglia C, Testa D, Motta G. Carbon diox-

 

Clin Moderna 1904; 10: 385–387

 

ide laser turbinate surgery for chronic obstructive rhinitis. La-

78

West J. Eine neue Methode zur Operation des Tränensackes von

 

sers Surg Med 2000; 27: 49–54

 

der Nase aus. Arch Laryngol Rhinol 1911; 24: 62–64

52

Katz S, Schmelzer B, Vidts G. Treatment of the obstructive nose

79

Michel O, Rüßmann W. Indikationen und Praxis der simultanen

 

by CO2-laser reduction of the inferior turbinates: technique

 

Ophthalmo-Rhino-Chirurgie. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993;

 

and results. Am J Rhinol 2000; 14: 51–55

 

1: 255–271

53

Tanigawa T, Yashiki T, Hayashi K, Sato T. Carbon dioxide laser

80

Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ. Endonasal laser dacryo-

 

vaporization for turbinate: optimal conditions and indications.

 

cystorhinstomy. A new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruc-

 

Auris Nasus Larynx 2000; 27: 137–140

 

tion. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 1172–1176

54

Rettinger G. Septal and turbinate surgery: What are the best

81

Eloy P, Trussart C, Jouzdani E, Collet S, Rombaux P, Bertrand B.

 

methods. Laryngorhinootologie 2000; 79: S258

 

Transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystrhinostomy.

55

Krespi YP. Laser-assisted surgery of the nasal septum. Lasers

 

Acta Otorhino Laryngol Belg 2000; 54: 157–163

 

Surg Med 1999; 11: 68

82

Carversaccio M, Frenz M, Schar P, Hausler R. Endonasal and

56

Kamami W. Laser-assisted outpatient septoplasty results on

 

transcanalicular Er:YAG laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Rhinol-

 

120 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1997; 15: 123–129

 

ogy 2001; 39: 28–32

57

Kamami YV, Pandraud L, Bougara A. Laser-assisted outpatient

83

Hartikainen MD, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppä H. Prospective

 

septoplasty: results in 703 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck

 

radomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and

 

Surg 2000; 122: 445–449

 

endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998;

58

Scherer H, Reichert K, Schildhauer S. Die Laserchirurgie des

 

105: 1106–1113

 

mittleren Nasenganges bei der rezidivierenden Sinusitis.

84

Patel BCK, Phillips B, McLeish WM, Flaharty P, Anderson RL.

 

Laryngorhinootologie 1999; 78: 50–53

 

Transcanalicular neodym:YAG laser for revision of dacryo-

59

Krespi J, Kacker A. Laser-assisted septoplasty. In: Oswal V,

 

cystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1101–1197

 

Remacle M (Hrsg). Principles and pracice of lasers in otorhi-

85

Müllner K, Wolf G. Endoskopische Behandlung von Tränen-

 

nolaryngology and head and neck surgery. The Hague, The

 

wegsstenosen mit Hilfe eines KTP-Lasers – Erster Erfahrungs-

 

Netherlands: Kugler Publications, 2002: 389–392

 

bericht. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1999; 215: 28–32

60

Lippert BM, Werner JA. CO2-laser in rhinology. Med Laser Appl

86

Gonnering RS, Lyon DB, Fischer JC. Endoscopic laser-assisted

 

2002; 17: im Druck

 

lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 152–157

61

Lenz H, Eichler J, Schäfer G, Salk J, Bettges G. Production of an

87

Christenbury JD. Translacrimal laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

 

nasoantral window with an Ar laser. J Maxillofac Surg 1977; 5:

 

Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 170–171

 

314–317

88

Reifler DM. Results of endoscopic KTP laser assisted dacryo-

62

Ohyama M. Laser polypectomy. Rhinol Suppl 1989; 8: 35–43

 

cystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 9: 231–

63

Kautzky M, Bigenzahn W, Steurer M, Susani M, Schenk P. Hol-

 

236

 

mium:YAG-Laserchirurgie. Anwendungsmöglichkeiten bei

89

Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA. Holmium:YAG endonasal laser

 

entzündlichen Nasennebenhöhlenerkrankungen. HNO 1992;

 

dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 116: 1–10

 

40: 468–471

90

Müllner K, Wolf G, Luxenberger W, Hofmann T. Laserassistierte

64

Gleich LL, Rebeiz EE, Pankratov MM, Shapshay SM. The hol-

 

transkanalikuläre Dakryozystorhinostomie. Ophthalmologe

 

mium:YAG laser-assisted otolaryngologic procedures. Arch

 

2001; 98: 174–177

 

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: 1162–1166

91

Moore EM, Bentley CR, Oliver JM. Functional and anatomic re-

65

Feyh J. Endoscopic surgery of the nose and paranasal sinuses

 

sults after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhi-

 

with the aid of the holmium:YAG laser. Adv Otorhinolaryngol

 

nostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology 2002;

 

1995; 49: 122–124

 

109: 1575–1582

66

Jones N. Lasers in rhinology. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114: 824–

92

Emmerich KH, Meyer-Rusenberg HW. Endoskopische Tränen-

 

826

 

wegschirurgie. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 607–612

67

Sato K, Nakashima T. Endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic si-

93

Emmerich KH, Lüchtenberg M, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Stein-

 

nusitis with antrochoanal polyp. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:

 

hauer J. Dacryoendoskopie und Laserdacryoplastik: Technik

 

1581–1583

 

und Ergebnisse. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997; 211: 375–

68

Stasche N, Hörmann K, Christ M, Schmidt H. Carbon dioxide la-

 

379

 

ser delivery systems in functional paranasal surgery. Adv

94

Steinhauer J, Norda A, Emmerich KH, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW.

 

Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 49: 114–117

 

Lasercanaliculoplastik. Ophthalmologe 2000; 97: 692–695

69

Zenner HP. Neue Technologien für die endonasale Nasen-

95

Emmerich KH, Busse H, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Hörstenmeyer

 

nebenhöhlenchirurgie. HNO 1997; 45: 347–352

 

CG. External dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, method,

70

Vollrath M. Ambulante Entfernung von Nasenpolypen durch

 

complications and results. Orbit 1997; 16: 25–29

 

Laserverfahren? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1997; 122: 347

96

You YA, Fang CT. Intraoperative mitomycin C in dacryo-

71

Stammberger H. Unsere endoskopische Operationstechnik der

 

cystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 17: 115–

 

lateralen Nasenwand – Ein endoskopisch-chirurgisches

 

119

 

Konzept zur Behandlung entzündlicher Nasennebenhöhlener-

97

Unlu HH, Toprak B, Aslan A, Guler C. Comparison of surgical

 

krankungen. Laryngorhinootologie 1985; 64: 559–566

 

outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with

72

Zhang B. Comparison of results of laser and routine surgery

 

and without silicone intubation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

 

therapy in treatment of nasal polyps. Chin Med J 1993; 106:

 

2002; 111: 704–709

 

707–708

98

Boush GA, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK. Results of endonasal laser

References 73

assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1994; 105: 955–959

99Otto AW. Lehrbuch der Pathologie, Anatomie des Menschen und der Tiere. Berlin: Rucker, 1830

100Tzifa KT, Skinner DW. Endoscopic repair of unilateral choanal atresia with the KTP laser: a one stage procedure. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 286–288

101Jung H. Congenital choanal atresia and surgical correction. Laryngorhinootol 1994; 73: 586–590

102Brown OE, Pownell P, Manning SC. Choanal atresia: a new anatomic classification and clinical management applications. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 97–101

103Pototschnig C, Volklein C, Appenroth E, Thumfart WF. Transnasal treatment of congenital choanal atresia with the KTP laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 100: 335–339

104Rudert H. Kombiniert transseptale-transnasale Chirurgie einseitiger Choanalatresien ohne Verwendung von Platzhaltern. Laryngorhinootologie 1999; 78: 697–702

105Illum P. Congenital choanal atresia treated by laser surgery. Rhinology 1986; 24: 205–209

106Emmert C. Lehrbuch der Chirurgie. Stuttgart: FVR Dann, 1853

107Park AH, Brockenbrough J, Stankiewicz J. Endoscopic versus traditional approaches to choanal atresia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000; 33: 77–90

108Healy GM, McGill T, Strong MS, Jako GJ, Vaughan CR. Management of choanal atresia with carbon dioxide lasern. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 87: 658

109Masing H, Steiner W. Treatment of choanal atresia. Laryngorhinootologie 1984; 63: 181–183

110Muntz HR. Pitfalls to laser correction of choanal atresia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96: 43–46

111Dedo HH. Transnasal mucosal flap rotation technique for repair of posterior choanal atresia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124: 674–682

112Meer A, Tschopp K. Choanal atresia in premature dizygotic twins – a transnasal approach with Holmium:YAG-laser. Rhinology 2000; 38: 191–194

113Furuta S, Itoh K, Shima T, Ohyama M. Laser beam in treating congenital atresia in three patients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 517: 33–35

114Wiatrak BJ. Unilateral choanal atresia: initial presentation and endoscopic repair. Int J Ped ORL 1998; 48: 27–35

115Fong M, Clarke K, Cron C. Clinical applications of the holmium:YAG laser in disorders of the paediatric airway. J Otolaryngol 1999; 28: 337–343

116Holzmann D, Ruckstuhl M. Unilateral choanal atresia: surgical technique and long-term results. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116: 601–604

117Panwar SS, Martin FW. Transnasal endoscopic holmium:YAG laser correction of choanal atresia. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110: 429–431

118Hidaka H, Ikeda K, Oshima T, Ohtani H, Suzuki H, Takasaka T. A case of extramedullary plasmacytoma arising from the nasal septum. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114: 53–55

119Giannoni C, Sulek M, Friedman EM, Duncan, 3rd NO. Acquired nasopharyngeal stenosis: a warning and review. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124: 163–167

120van Duyne J, Coleman, Jr JA. Treatment of nasopharyngeal inlet

stenosis following uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with the CO2- laser. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 914–918

121Dedo HH, Yu KC. CO2-laser treatment in 244 patients with respiratory papillomas. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 1639–1644

122Gunkel AR, Sturm C, Simma B, Thumfart WF. Transoral CO2-la- ser resection of extensive nasal and oropharyngeal teratoma. Lryngerhinootologie 1996; 75: 239–241

123Scholtz AW, Appenroth E, Kammen-Jolly K, Scholtz JU, Thumfart WF. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: management and therapy. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 681–687

124Nakamura H, Kawasaki M, Higuchi Y, Seki S, Takahashi S. Transnasal endoscopic resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with the KTP laser. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 256: 212–214

125Yamashita K, Ogawa A. The use of Nd:YAG laser in the management of nasopharyngeal pathology. J Jpn Laser Med 1984; 4: 229–230

126Godbersen GS. Indications, risks and results of laser therapy for recurrent epistaxis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 49: 109– 113

127Lenz H, Eichler J. Wirkung des Argon-Lasers auf die Gefäße, Mikround Makrozirkulation der Schleimhaut der Hamsterbackentasche. Eine intravitalmikroskopische Studie. Laryngorhinootologie 1975; 54: 612–619

128Werner JA, Geisthoff UW, Lippert BW, Rudert H. Behandlung der rezidivierenden Epistaxis bei Morbus Rendu-Osler-Weber. HNO 1997; 45: 673–681

129Jaques SL. Laser-tissue interactions. Photochemical, photothermal and photomechnical. Surg Clin North Am 1992; 72: 531–558

130Hanes FM. Multiple hereditary telangiectases cause hemorrhage (hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia). Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1909; 20: 63–73

131Porteous MEM, Burn J, Proctor SJ. Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: a clinical analysis. J Med Genet 1992; 29: 527– 530

132Johnson DW, Berg JN, Baldwin MA. Mutations in the activin re- ceptor-like kinase 1 gene in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2. Nature Gen 1996; 13: 189–195

133Plauchu H, de Chadarevian JP, Bedeau A, Robert JM. Age-relat- ed clinical profile of herditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia in an epidemiologically recruited population. Am J Med Genet 1989; 32: 291–297

134Braverman IM, Keh A, Jacobson BS. Ultrastructure and threedimensional organization of the telangiectases of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Invest Dermat 1990; 95: 422– 427

135Folz BJ, Dünne AA, Wollstein AC, Werner JA. Umfassendes Screening auf okkulte, arterio-venöse Malformationen bei M. Osler-Patienten mit Epistaxis als Indexsymptom. HNO Informationen 2002; 2: 112

136Siegel MB; Keane WM, Atkins JP, Rosen MR. Control of epistaxis in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 105: 675–679

137Dobrovic M, Hosch H. Non-contact applications of Nd:YAG laser in nasal surgery. Rhinology 1994; 32: 71–73

138Kluger PB, Shapshay SM, Hybels RL, Bohigian RK. NeodymiumYAG laser intranasal photocoagulation in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: an update report. Laryngoscope 1987;

97:1397–1401

139Werner JA, Lippert BM, Geisthoff UW, Rudert H. Nd:YAG-La- sertherapie der rezidivierenden Epistaxis bei hereditärer hämorrhagischer Teleaniektasie. Laryngorhinootologie 1997;

76:495–501

140Ben-Bassat M, Kaplan I, Levy R. Treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia of the nasal mucosa with the carbon dioxide laser. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31: 157–158

141Simpson GT, Shapshay SM, Vaughn CW, Strong MS. Rhinologic surgery with the carbon dioxide laser. Laryngoscope 1982; 92: 412–415

142Haye R, Austad J. Hereditary haemorrhagic teleangiectasia – argon laser. Rhinology 1991; 29: 5–9

143Parkin JL, Dixon JA. Argon laser treatment of head and neck vascular lesions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 211–216

144Haye R, Austad J. Hereditary haemorrhagic teleangiectasia: usuccessful treatment with the flashlamp-pulsed dye laser. Rhinology 1992; 30: 135–137

145Harries PG, Brockbank MJ, Shakespeare PG, Carruth JAS. Treatment of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia by the pulsed dye laser. J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111: 1038–1041

146Hopf JUG, Hopf M, Rohde E, Roggan A, Eichwald H, Scherer H. Die Behandlung der rezidivierenden Epistaxis mit den Diodenlaser. Lasermedizin 2000; 15: 96–106

147Lennox, Harries M, Lund VJ, Howard DJ. A retrospective study of the role of the argon laser in the management of epistaxis secondary to hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111: 34–37

148Shapshay SM, Oliver P. Treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia by Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation. Laryngoscope 1984; 94: 1554–1556

149Illum P, Bjerring P. Hereditary hemorrhagic teleangiectasia treated by laser surgery. Rhinology 1988; 26: 19–24

74 Lasers in Rhinology

150Crockett DM, Healy GB, McGill TJ; Friedman EM. Benign lesions of the nose, oral cavity and oropharynx in children: excision by carbon dioxide laser. Ann Otol Rhonl Lryngol 1985; 94: 489–493

151Keles N, Deger K. Endonasal endoscopic surgical treatment of paranasal sinus inverted papilloma – first experiences. Rhinology 2001; 39: 156–159

152Greinwald JH, Burke DK, Bonthius KJ, Baumann NM, Smith RJH. An update on the treatment of hemangiomas in children with interferon alfa-2a. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125: 21–27

153Grantzow R. Probleme in der Nd-YAG-Laserbehandlung großer Hämangiome. In: Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U, Voigt T (Hrsg). Benigne Gefäßund Neubildungen. Berlin: Blackwell, 2002: 99–103

154Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of infants and children: A classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 412– 422

155Hohenleutner U. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Lasertherapie. In: Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U, Voigt T (Hrsg). Benigne Gefäßund Neubildungen. Berlin: Blackwell, 2002: 91–98

156Kim Y, Stearns G, Davidson TM. Hemangioma of the ethmoid sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123: 517–519

157Raboso E, Rosell A, Plaza G, Martinez-Vidal A. Haemangioma of the maxillary sinus. J Laryngol Otol 1997; 111: 638–640

158Strek P, Modrzejewski M, Kitlinski Z. Lobular capillary hemangioma of the nasal septum. Otolaryngol Pol 1997; 51: 555–557

159Werner JA, Dünne AA, Folz BJ, Rochels R, Ramaswamy A, Lippert BM. Current concepts in the classification, diagnosis and treatment of hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 258: 141– 149

160Werner JA, Bien S, Dünne AA, Rochels R, Seyberth H, Folz BJ, Lippert BM. Fortgeschrittene extrakranielle Hämangiome und vaskuläre Malformationen. Dt Ärzteblatt 2002; 99: 188–193

161Werner JA, Lippert BM, Gottschlich S, Folz BJ, Fleiner B, Hoeft S, Rudert H. Ultrasound-guided interstitial Nd:YAG laser treatment of voluminous hemangiomas and vascular malformations in 92 patients. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 463–470

162Werner JA, Lippert BM, Hoffmann P, Rudert H. Nd:YAG laser therapy of voluminous hemangiomas and vascular malformations. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 49: 75–80

163Werner JA, Lippert BM, Godbersen GS, Rudert H. Die Hämangiombehandlung mit dem Neodym:Yttrium-Aluminium-Granat Laser (Nd:YAG-Laser). Laryngorhinootologie 1992; 71: 388– 395

164Denk MJ, Ajkay N, Yuan X, Rosenblum RS, Freda N, Magee, Jr WP. Surgical treatment of nasal hemangiomas. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48: 489–494, discussion: 494–495

165McCarthy JG, Borud LJ, Schreiber JS. Hemangiomas of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 31–40

166Uysal KM, Olgun N, Erbay A, Sarialioglu F. High-dose oral me- thyl-prednisolone therapy in childhood hemangiomas. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2001; 18: 335–341

167Waner M, Suen JY. A classification of congenital vascular malformations of the head and neck. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1999: 1–12

168Somma AM, Dioguardi D. CO2-laser surgery in recurrent tumors of the nose. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 9: 172–174

169Hopf JUG, Hopf M. Funktionell-endoskopische endonasale Laserchirurgie. Tuttlingen: Endo-Press, 2001

170Levine HL. Lasers in endonasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997; 30: 451–455

171Rontal M, Rontal E. Treatment of recurrent carcinoma at the base of the skull with carbon dioxide Laser. Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 1261–1265

172Feyh J, Gutmann R, Leunig A, Jäger L, Reiser M, Saxton RE, Castro DJ, Kastenbauer E. MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) of head and neck tumors: progress with a new method. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1996; 14: 361–366

173Paiva MB, Blackwell KE, Saxton RE, Calcaterra TC, Ward PH, Soudant J, Castro DJ. Palliative Laser Therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer: a phase II clinical study. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1277–1283

174von Hebra F. Versuch einer auf pathologische Anatomie gegründete Einteilung der Hautkrankheiten. Z der KK Ges d Ärzte 1845; 2: 145

175Acker DW, Helwig EB. Rhinophyma with carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 1967; 95: 250–254

176Orenstein A, Haik J, Tamir J, Winkler E, Frand J, Zilinsky I, Kaplan H. Treatment of rhinophyma with Er:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 2001; 29: 230–235

177Har-El G, Shapshay SM, Bohigian RK, Krespi YP, Lucente FE. The treatment of rhinophyma. „Cold“ vs laser techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119: 628–631

178Wenig BL, Weingarten RT. Excision of rhinophyma with Nd:YAG laser: A new technique. Laryngoscope 1993; 103: 101–103

179Ali MK, Calleri RH, Mobly DL. Resection of rhinophym with CO2-laser. Laryngoscope 1987; 7: 1316–1318

180el-Azhary RA, Roenigk RK, Wang TD. Spectrum of results after treatment of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 899–905

181Shapshay SM, Strong MS, Anastasi GW, Vaughan CW. Removal of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser: a preliminary report. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 257–259

182Karim Ali M, Streitmann MJ. Excision of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser: a ten-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 952–955

183Sedlmaier B, Fuhrer A, Jovanovic S. New treatment possibili-

ties for skin changes with the CO2-laser in head and neck surgery. HNO 1997; 45: 625–629

184Abergel Rp, Dahlman CM. The CO2-laser approach to the treatment of acne scarring. Cosmetic Dermatol 1995; 8: 33–35

185Gjuric M, Rettinger G. Comparison of carbon dioxide laser and electro-surgery in the treatment of rhinophyma. Rhinology 1993; 31: 37–39

186Kaufmann R, Hartmann A, Hibst R. Cutting and skin-ablative properties of pulsed mid-infrared laser surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994; 20: 112–118

187Stucker FJ, Hoasjoe DK, Aarstad RF. Rhinophyma: a new approach to hemostasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 925–929

188Ell C, Baumgartner R, Gossner L, Häußinger K, Iro H, Jocham D, Szeimies R-M. Photodynamische Therapie. Dt Ärzteblatt 2000; 97: 3337–3343

189Kulapaditharom B, Boonkitticharoen V. Photodynamic therapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer. J Med Assoc Thai 1999; 82: 1111–1117

190Tong MC, van Hasselt CA, Woo JK. Preliminary results of photodynamic therapy for recurrent nasolpharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 253: 189–192

191Biel MA. Photodynamic therapy and the treatment of head and neck neoplasia. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1259–1268

192Lofgren LA, Hallgren S, Nilsson E, Westernborn A, Nilsson C, Reizenstein J. Photodynamic therpy for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121: 997– 1002

193Lippert BM, Klahr N, Külkens C, Folz BJ, Werner JA. 5-Delta- Aminolävulinsäure induzierte Fluoreszenzdiagnostik bei Karzinomen der oberen Luftund Speisewege – erste Ergebnisse. In: Lippert BM, Schmidt S, Werner JA (Hrsg). Fluoreszenzdiagnostik und photodynamische Therapie. Aachen: Shaker, 2000: 65–73

194Feyh J. Photodynamic treatment for cancers of the head and neck. J Photochem Photobiol B 1996; 36: 175–177

195Kennedy JC, Pottier RH, Pross DC. Photodynamic therapy with endogenous protoporphyrin IX: basic principles and present clinical experience. J Photochem Photobiol B 1990; 6: 143–148

196Radakovic-Fijan S, Hönigsmann H, Tanew A. Photodynamische Therapie bei Präkanzerosen der Haut (aktinische Keratosen, M. Bowen). In: Szeimies RM, Jocham D, Landthaler M (Hrsg). Klinische Fluoreszenzdiagnostik und Photodynamische Therapie. Berlin: Blackwell, 2002: 191–205

197Szeimies RM, Abels C, Bäumler W, Karrer S, Landthaler M. Photodynamische Therapie in der Dermatologie. In: Krutmann J, Hönigsmann H (Hrsg). Handbuch der klinischen Photodermatologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1997: 196–233

References 75

198Casas A, Fukuda H, di Venosa G, Batle AM. The influence of the vehicle on the synthesis of porphyrins after topical application of 5-amino-laevulinic acid. Implications in cutaneous photodynamic sensitisation. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 564–572

199Wolf P, Rieger E, Kerl H. Topical photodynamic therapy with endogenous porphyrins after application of 5-aminolevulinic acid. An alternative treatment modality for solar keratoses, superficial squamous cell carcinomas, and basal cell carcinomas? J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 28: 17–21

200Heinritz H, Benzel W, Sroka R, Iro H. Photodynamic therapy of superficial skin tumors following local application of deltaaminolaevulinic acid. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 49: 48–52

201Lang S, Baumgartner R, Struck R, Leunig A, Gutmann R, Feyh J. Photodynamische Diagnostik und Therapie von Neoplasien der Gesichtshaut nach topischer Applikation von 5-Aminolä- vulinsäure. Laryngorhinootologie 1995; 74: 85–89

202Svanberg K, Andersson T, Killander D, Wang I, Stenram U, An- dersson-Engels S, Berg R, Johansson J, Svanberg S. Photody-

namic therapy of non-melanoma malignant tumors of the skin using topical delta-aminolevulinic acid sensitisation and laser irradiation. Br J Dermatol 1994; 130: 743–751

203Calzavara-Pinton PG. Repetitive photodynamic therapy with topical delta-aminlaevulinic acid as an appropriate approach to the routine treatment of superficial non-melanoma skin tumours. J Photochem Photobiol B 1995; 29: 53–57

204Jeffes EW, McCullough JL, Weinstein GD. Photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid. A pilot doseranging study. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 727–732

205Karrer S, Szeimies RM, Hohenleutner U, Landthaler M. Role of lasers and photodynamic therapy in the treatment of cutaneous malignancy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001; 2: 229–237

206Kalka K, Merk H, Mukhtar H. Photodynamic therapy in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 389–416

This page intentionally left blank

77

4Laser Use in the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx

W.Bergler

T Contents

Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78

Characteristics of Lasers Used in the Oral Cavity

and Oropharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

Importance of Laser Surgery in the Oral Cavity

and Oropharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

Properties and Indications of Lasers Used in the

Oral Cavity and Oropharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

CO2 Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

Nd:YAG Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

Argon Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Erbium:YAG Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Excimer Laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Clinical Uses of Lasers in the Oral Cavity and

Oropharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Hyperplasia of the Lingual Tonsil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Vascular Malformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

Other Benign Tumors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

Premalignant Lesions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

Malignant Tumors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

Labial and Lingual Frenoplasties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

Lasers in the Treatment of Snoring and

Sleep Apnea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Contraindications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Evaluating Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Efficacy of Laser-Assisted Uvulopalatoplasty

in Obstructive Sleep Apnea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Efficacy of Laser-Assisted Uvulopalatoplasty for

Primary Snoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Pain and Laser-Assisted Uvulopalatoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Complications after Laser-Assisted

Uvulopalatoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 Overall Evaluation of Laser-Assisted

Uvulopalatoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

Laser Use on the Tonsils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

Laser Tonsillectomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

Mucosa-Intact Laser Tonsillar Ablation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85

Laser Tonsillotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

Lasers in the Treatment of Salivary Gland Diseases . . 86

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87

78 Laser Use in the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx

T Abstract

cavity and oropharynx, and it may be necessary to remove

the tumor piecemeal if visualization is poor. The histologic

Good accessibility of the oral cavity and oropharynx has fa-

workup can be difficult in some cases and requires close

teamwork between the surgeon and pathologist.

vored the development of numerous laser applications in

 

 

this region. The CO2, KTP, and Nd:YAG lasers are most com-

Some of the most frequent indications for laser use in the

monly used for cutting mucosa and devitalizing tissue. The

oral cavity and oropharynx are listed below:

most important laser applications in these regions are in

Tongue base reduction

tonsillar surgery and soft-palate surgery for sleep-disor-

Tonsillar surgery

dered breathing. Besides tonsillectomy, various authors

Soft-palate surgery

have also described laser tonsillotomies with the goal of pre-

Treatment of hemangiomas

venting intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and re-

• Excision of benign tumors

ducing postoperative pain. While these positive effects have

• Treatment of premalignant lesions

been documented in several studies, they have not yet been

• Excision of malignant tumors

widely confirmed. Laser tonsillectomy is more costly and re-

• Frenectomies (of the lip, tongue, or cheek)

quires an elaborate safety protocol. Different problems arise

Salivary gland diseases

in association with laser use on the soft palate, as in laser-

 

 

assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP). LAUP is a very promising

 

 

technique owing to the simplicity of the procedure. Unfor-

Properties and Indications of Lasers Used in

tunately, published data indicate that LAUP should be used

the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx

only in the treatment of primary snoring and is not appro-

priate for sleep apnea. Even with careful patient selection,

CO2 Laser

the potentially severe complications should not be over-

looked. Many other possible laser applications have been

 

 

published including the excision of small tumors, the treat-

The CO2 laser was first developed by Patel et al. in 1964 [3]

ment of leukoplakia, frenectomies, and the fragmentation of

and introduced for medical use in the early 1970s [4–6].

salivary stones. Laser application for these indications is just

The CO2 laser is a type of gas laser. It emits light at a wave-

one possible treatment modality offering only marginal ad-

length of 10.6 µm (10,600 nm) in the invisible, infrared re-

vantages over conventional techniques when the added

gion of the spectrum. This requires the use of a coaxial he-

costs are taken into account. Laser use for these indications

lium-neon (HeNE) laser aiming beam, whose 0.633-nm

is basically a matter of individual preference and availability.

wavelength is in the visible (red) region of the spectrum.

T Characteristics of Lasers Used in the

Because of its wavelength, the CO2 laser has strong affinity

for water. This accounts for the good absorption of CO2 la-

Oral Cavity and Oropharynx

ser energy by the oral mucosa, which consists of more than

 

 

90 % water. The CO2 laser has excellent cutting and ablating

Importance of Laser Surgery in the Oral Cavity

properties, especially in soft tissue. Its maximum penetra-

tion depth in tissue is less than 1 mm. The CO2 laser beam

and Oropharynx

itself is not reflected or scattered in the mucosa [7]. Ab-

The carbon dioxide (CO2), neodymium:yttrium aluminum

sorption of the laser energy by water causes rapid genera-

tion of heat, which carbonizes the tissue. The laser can be

garnet (Nd:YAG), potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP), and

operated in pulsed mode (superpulse or ultrapulse) or in

argon lasers are most commonly used for soft-tissue sur-

continuous mode (continuous-wave [CW]). The CW mode

gery in the oral cavity and oropharynx. The lasers are used

is preferred for oral soft-tissue surgery. The CO2 laser en-

for cutting and ablation of tissue and the coagulation of tis-

ergy is applied to the target tissue using a noncontact tech-

sue surfaces. Depending on the specific indication and the

nique. One disadvantage compared with the Nd:YAG laser

type of laser used, lasers can offer advantages over tradi-

is that the CO2 laser requires a rigid delivery system.

tional surgical methods[1, 2]:

 

 

• spontaneous occlusion of small transected vessels, pro-

When applied in the oral cavity and oropharynx, the CO2

 

viding hemostasis and an almost bloodless field;

laser is used mainly as a cutting instrument to remove be-

no-touch operating technique;

nign and malignant lesions [8–12]. It is also used for in-

precise incisions under microscopic control with little

traoral incisional and excisional biopsies and frenectomies.

 

collateral tissue damage;

 

 

no need for sutures. All therapeutic options remain

Nd:YAG Laser

 

open, such as repeating the laser therapy or resection of

 

an extensive tumor in case of a recurrence.

The Nd:YAG laser emits a beam in the invisible, infrared

 

 

It is also important, however, to factor in the high costs

part of the spectrum (similar to the CO2 laser) at a wave-

incurred by laser use (e.g., a dedicated laser operating

length of 1064 nm. A coaxial HeNe laser is used to produce

suite) and the necessary safety measures.

a visible aiming beam. YAG, which stands for “yttrium-alu-

 

 

minum-garnet,” is the host crystal for the neodymium ion

Some cases may not be amenable to a classic en-bloc re-

and is distinguished by its relatively high thermal conduc-

section, depending on the extent of the tumor in the oral

tivity and good optical quality. The advantage of the

 

Clinical Uses of Lasers in the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx 79

 

 

 

Nd:YAG laser over the CO2 laser is that the laser energy can

Excimer laser

be delivered into the oral cavity through a flexible carrier

 

 

[13] and can be applied through quartz fibers in flexible

The excimer laser, just as the erbium:YAG laser, has mainly

endoscopes. The Nd:YAG laser can be used interstitially,

dental applications in the oral cavity and oropharynx. The

out of contact, or in contact with the target tissue.

active medium of the excimer laser is a noble gas combined

The light emitted by the Nd:YAG laser is weakly absorbed

with a halogen gas, such as xenon–fluoride or argon–fluo-

ride. The composition of the gas determines the wave-

by water, but it has strong affinity for dark and pigmented

length of the laser and is generally in the ultraviolet range

tissues such as hemoglobin and melanin [14]. Because

[1]. As with the erbium:YAG laser, dental hard tissue can

Nd:YAG laser light is transmitted through water, it pene-

be removed by photoablation. The rate of ablation depends

trates more deeply into tissue than the CO2 laser beam. It

on the mineral content and morphologic structural ele-

undergoes minimal reflection. Owing to its properties, the

ments of the dental hard tissue. Tissue affected by caries is

Nd:YAG laser is best for treating more deeply situated ar-

ablated at a considerably faster rate than intact dental

eas in the oral cavity and oropharynx. Because the Nd:YAG

enamel or dentin [21].

laser energy is strongly absorbed by hemoglobin, it is very

 

 

effective for coagulation [1]. The laser can be operated in a

A major drawback of the excimer laser is that its light can-

pulsed or continuous mode.

not be transmitted through a flexible carrier. Besides high

 

equipment costs, the energy density at the target can be

Argon Laser

controlled only by adjusting the focal–object distance, and

the beam must be passed through an aperture to screen off

The argon laser is a type of ion laser that uses a noble gas

areas at the beam periphery [22].

 

 

as the lasing medium. It emits primarily at 488 nm in the

 

 

blue part of the visible spectrum and at 514 nm in the

T Clinical Uses of Lasers in the Oral Cavity

green part of the spectrum. As with the Nd:YAG laser, the

and Oropharynx

light can be delivered into the oral cavity through a

fiberoptic carrier.

 

 

Argon lasers have strong affinity for dark-colored tissue

The following sections deal only with the most frequent

clinical indications and applications of lasers in the oral

and hemoglobin, such as melanin, hemangiomas, Kaposi

cavity and oropharynx.

sarcoma, and nevi, making them particularly useful for co-

 

 

agulation [15]. The argon laser beam is not reflected from

Hyperplasia of the Lingual Tonsil

the oral tissues. It undergoes relatively little absorption,

transmission, or scattering. Like the Nd:YAG laser, the ar-

 

 

gon laser can be used in or out of contact with the target

Hyperplastic changes in the region of the base of the

tissue.

tongue may result from chronic recurrent inflammation of

Unlike the CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers, the argon laser (blue

the lingual tonsils. However, the differential diagnosis

should also include ectopic thyroid tissue and malignant

wavelength) can also polymerize composite resins [16, 17].

lesions such as lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

This property is used mainly in periodontal therapy, where

Hyperplastic changes can lead to swallowing difficulties,

the laser is used for the photopolymerization and curing of

globus sensation, or fetid breath odor, and chronic infec-

resin materials up to 3 cm thick [18, 19]. The green wave-

tion can lead to febrile episodes of unknown cause with

length is used primarily for intraoral soft-tissue work and

odynophagia. Laser ablation of the hyperplastic tissue is of-

hemostasis, particularly in the treatment of vascular and

ten recommended in such cases, sometimes after an inef-

pigmented lesions in the oropharynx and oral cavity. An-

fectual trial of conservative therapy [2].

giitis can develop as a late reaction in exposed vessels,

 

 

leading to vascular occlusion. Superficial coagulation with

Owing to its physical properties and hemostatic effect, the

subsequent scarring has not been observed with this laser

CO2 laser is particularly useful for the reduction of hyper-

system.

plastic lingual tonsils. The CO2 laser markedly reduces the

 

risk of collateral deep tissue injury compared with the

Erbium:YAG Laser

Nd:YAG laser [23]. As studies by Steiner et al. have shown,

laser resection that is confined strictly to lymphatic tissue

Like the Nd:YAG laser, the erbium:YAG laser belongs to the

and does not injure the muscles of the base of the tongue

causes less intraoperative bleeding [24]. Laser surgery is as-

category of pulsed solid-state lasers. It emits a beam in the

sociated with significantly less postoperative pain (includ-

infrared part of the spectrum at a wavelength of 2.94 µm.

ing neuralgiform pain radiating to the ears) and postopera-

Because it is strongly absorbed by water, the erbium:YAG

tive edema than more extensive resections, which may be

laser is useful for cutting and ablation but is not a very ef-

followed by considerably more complications.

fective coagulator [1]. Because of these properties, the er-

 

 

bium:YAG laser is used mainly in dentistry for cutting bone

 

 

and dental hard tissue [20]. It is not widely used in oral

 

 

soft-tissue surgery.