Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Mini-course 1 Decision Analysis (Dr. Mariya Sodenkamp) / Class 2 / Paderborn_ITB_L2_ 2015_04_17 Students

.pdf
Скачиваний:
16
Добавлен:
27.03.2016
Размер:
1.52 Mб
Скачать

Agenda

Decision Making in Complex Systems: Paradigms &

Challenges

   

Decision Process

Measurement

Pareto Op@mality (most probably next @me)

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

Folie 2

 

Car A

Car B

Car C

Price

$15,300

$13,600

$11,500

Comfort

Luxury

Deluxe

Standard

Horse-power

280

220

200

Fuel

12

10

8

consump3on

 

 

 

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

Folie 3

Examples of decision problems (cont‘d)

Investment

Akquisi@on

Marke@ng

Service or product development Produc@on

Human resource management Transporta@on Reorganiza@on etc.

Prac@cally, for making such decisions, managers mix the analy@cal and intui@ve problem solving approaches.

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

Folie 4

Defini3ons of decision making

–  Decision making is a process of human ac@vity aimed at selec@on of the best alterna@ve ac@on.

–  Decision making is choosing between alterna@ve courses of ac@on using cogni@ve processes – memory, thinking, evalua@on.

–  Decision making is the study of iden@fying and choosing alterna@ves based on the values and preferences of the decision maker. Making a decision implies that there are alterna@ve choices to be considered, and in such a case we want not only to iden@fy as many of these alterna@ves as possible but to choose the one that best fits with our goals, objec@ves, desires, mo@ves, and so on..

 

 

 

Harris, R.(1998) Introduc2on to Decision Making,

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Folie 5

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

Areas of Decision Theory

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

Folie 6

Current state of corporate decision making

wOnly 37% of decision makers say they have a clear understanding of what their organiza@on is trying to achieve.

wOnly 1 in 5 are enthusias@c about their team’s and organiza@on’s goals.

wOnly 1 in 5 say they have a clear line of site between their tasks and their organiza@on’s goals.

SOURCE: Harris Poll of 23,000 respondents

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

At least 50% of all decisions end in failure

These results come from a database of 163 business decisions compiled over 16 years

The database includes decisions by managers at private firms, government agencies, and non-profit organiza@ons. In each case, Nu` asked a topranking o cial of the organiza@on to suggest a decision involving the organiza@on and to name two execu@ves who were familiar with the decision and responsible for carrying it out.

The decisions could involve anything -- from purchasing equipment to renova@ng space to deciding which products or services to sell.

Nu` conducted in-depth interviews with the two o cials selected, asking each to spell out the sequence of steps that were taken to carry out the decision-making e ort.

Acer the interviews, Nu` provided a wri`en summary of the decisionmaking process to each of the o cials involved so they could check it for

accuracy. Source: Why Decisions Fail - Author Paul Nutt - Publisher; Berret & Koehler 2002. 20 year study of over 400 business decisions from Public, Private and Not-For Profit organizations in the United States, Canada & Europe.

(Advanced) IT in Business | © Sodenkamp

At least 50% of all decisions end in failure

  

36% of all decisions made were never implemented (“ini@al failure”). A „par@al failure“ occurred when only some part of the decision was adopted.

50% of decisions implemented are discon@nued acer 2 years (“ul@mate failure”).

Nu` then has expanded his database to 376 decisions, each involving a separate organiza@on. Although he has not finished analyzing the new data, preliminary results suggest the general picture is the same -- 40% of the decisions in the expanded database resulted in ini@al failures.

66% of decisions are based on failure prone methods.

Decisions using high par@cipa@on succeed 80% of the @me but occurs only 20% of the @me.

At least 50% of all decisions end in failure

The most

par@cipa@on

 

of those who

lowest

 

failure rate

23% of

 

decisions.

 

In contrast,

managers

 

simply issue

-- was the

 

least

a failure

 

rate of 64%.

 

Nu` said he

tac@cs,

but don't feel

.

"Most of the

but

uncommonly

fast answers

and fail to

almost

every

 

Read more at

Соседние файлы в папке Class 2