
- •Contents
- •1 Russian
- •1.1 The Russian language
- •1.1.1 Russian then and now
- •1.1.2 Levels of language
- •1.2 Describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.1 Conventions of notation
- •1.2.2 Abbreviations
- •1.2.3 Dictionaries and grammars
- •1.2.4 Statistics and corpora
- •1.2.5 Strategies of describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.6 Two fundamental concepts of (Russian) grammar
- •1.3 Writing Russian
- •1.3.1 The Russian Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.2 A brief history of the Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.3 Etymology of letters
- •1.3.4 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (basics)
- •1.3.5 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (refinements)
- •1.3.6 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (lexical idiosyncrasies)
- •1.3.7 Transliteration
- •2 Sounds
- •2.1 Sounds
- •2.2 Vowels
- •2.2.1 Stressed vowels
- •2.2.3 Vowel duration
- •2.2.4 Unstressed vowels
- •2.2.5 Unpaired consonants [ˇs ˇz c] and unstressed vocalism
- •2.2.6 Post-tonic soft vocalism
- •2.2.7 Unstressed vowels in sequence
- •2.2.8 Unstressed vowels in borrowings
- •2.3 Consonants
- •2.3.1 Classification of consonants
- •2.3.2 Palatalization of consonants
- •2.3.3 The distribution of palatalized consonants
- •2.3.4 Palatalization assimilation
- •2.3.5 The glide [j]
- •2.3.6 Affricates
- •2.3.7 Soft palatal fricatives
- •2.3.8 Geminate consonants
- •2.3.9 Voicing of consonants
- •2.4 Phonological variation
- •2.4.1 General
- •2.4.2 Phonological variation: idiomaticity
- •2.4.3 Phonological variation: systemic factors
- •2.4.4 Phonological variation: phonostylistics and Old Muscovite pronunciation
- •2.5 Morpholexical alternations
- •2.5.1 Preliminaries
- •2.5.2 Consonant grades
- •2.5.3 Types of softness
- •2.5.4 Vowel grades
- •2.5.5 Morphophonemic {o}
- •3 Inflectional morphology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Conjugation of verbs
- •3.2.1 Verbal categories
- •3.2.2 Conjugation classes
- •3.2.3 Stress patterns
- •3.2.4 Conjugation classes: I-Conjugation
- •3.2.5 Conjugation classes: suffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.6 Conjugation classes: quasisuffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.7 Stress in verbs: retrospective
- •3.2.8 Irregularities in conjugation
- •3.2.9 Secondary imperfectivization
- •3.3 Declension of pronouns
- •3.3.1 Personal pronouns
- •3.3.2 Third-person pronouns
- •3.3.3 Determiners (demonstrative, possessive, adjectival pronouns)
- •3.4 Quantifiers
- •3.5 Adjectives
- •3.5.1 Adjectives
- •3.5.2 Predicative (‘‘short”) adjectives
- •3.5.3 Mixed adjectives and surnames
- •3.5.4 Comparatives and superlatives
- •3.6 Declension of nouns
- •3.6.1 Categories and declension classes of nouns
- •3.6.2 Hard, soft, and unpaired declensions
- •3.6.3 Accentual patterns
- •3.6.8 Declension and gender of gradation
- •3.6.9 Accentual paradigms
- •3.7 Complications in declension
- •3.7.1 Indeclinable common nouns
- •3.7.2 Acronyms
- •3.7.3 Compounds
- •3.7.4 Appositives
- •3.7.5 Names
- •4 Arguments
- •4.1 Argument phrases
- •4.1.1 Basics
- •4.1.2 Reference of arguments
- •4.1.3 Morphological categories of nouns: gender
- •4.1.4 Gender: unpaired ‘‘masculine” nouns
- •4.1.5 Gender: common gender
- •4.1.6 Morphological categories of nouns: animacy
- •4.1.7 Morphological categories of nouns: number
- •4.1.8 Number: pluralia tantum, singularia tantum
- •4.1.9 Number: figurative uses of number
- •4.1.10 Morphological categories of nouns: case
- •4.2 Prepositions
- •4.2.1 Preliminaries
- •4.2.2 Ligature {o}
- •4.2.3 Case government
- •4.3 Quantifiers
- •4.3.1 Preliminaries
- •4.3.2 General numerals
- •4.3.3 Paucal numerals
- •4.3.5 Preposed quantified noun
- •4.3.6 Complex numerals
- •4.3.7 Fractions
- •4.3.8 Collectives
- •4.3.9 Approximates
- •4.3.10 Numerative (counting) forms of selected nouns
- •4.3.12 Quantifier (numeral) cline
- •4.4 Internal arguments and modifiers
- •4.4.1 General
- •4.4.2 Possessors
- •4.4.3 Possessive adjectives of unique nouns
- •4.4.4 Agreement of adjectives and participles
- •4.4.5 Relative clauses
- •4.4.6 Participles
- •4.4.7 Comparatives
- •4.4.8 Event nouns: introduction
- •4.4.9 Semantics of event nouns
- •4.4.10 Arguments of event nouns
- •4.5 Reference in text: nouns, pronouns, and ellipsis
- •4.5.1 Basics
- •4.5.2 Common nouns in text
- •4.5.3 Third-person pronouns
- •4.5.4 Ellipsis (‘‘zero” pronouns)
- •4.5.5 Second-person pronouns and address
- •4.5.6 Names
- •4.6 Demonstrative pronouns
- •4.7 Reflexive pronouns
- •4.7.1 Basics
- •4.7.2 Autonomous arguments
- •4.7.3 Non-immediate sites
- •4.7.4 Special predicate--argument relations: existential, quantifying, modal, experiential predicates
- •4.7.5 Unattached reflexives
- •4.7.6 Special predicate--argument relations: direct objects
- •4.7.7 Special predicate--argument relations: passives
- •4.7.8 Autonomous domains: event argument phrases
- •4.7.9 Autonomous domains: non-finite verbs
- •4.7.12 Retrospective on reflexives
- •4.8 Quantifying pronouns and adjectives
- •4.8.1 Preliminaries: interrogatives as indefinite pronouns
- •4.8.7 Summary
- •4.8.9 Universal adjectives
- •5 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1.1 Predicates and arguments, in general
- •5.1.2 Predicate aspectuality and modality
- •5.1.3 Aspectuality and modality in context
- •5.1.4 Predicate information structure
- •5.1.5 Information structure in context
- •5.1.6 The concept of subject and the concept of object
- •5.1.7 Typology of predicates
- •5.2 Predicative adjectives and nouns
- •5.2.1 General
- •5.2.2 Modal co-predicates
- •5.2.3 Aspectual co-predicates
- •5.2.4 Aspectual and modal copular predicatives
- •5.2.5 Copular constructions: instrumental
- •5.2.6 Copular adjectives: predicative (short) form vs. nominative (long) form
- •5.2.9 Predicatives in non-finite clauses
- •5.2.10 Summary: case usage in predicatives
- •5.3 Quantifying predicates and genitive subjects
- •5.3.1 Basics
- •5.3.2 Clausal quantifiers and subject quantifying genitive
- •5.3.3 Subject quantifying genitive without quantifiers
- •5.3.4 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: basic paradigm
- •5.3.5 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates
- •5.3.6 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: reference
- •5.3.8 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates and reference
- •5.3.9 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: context
- •5.3.10 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: summary
- •5.4 Quantified (genitive) objects
- •5.4.1 Basics
- •5.4.2 Governed genitive
- •5.4.3 Partitive and metric genitive
- •5.4.4 Object genitive of negation
- •5.4.5 Genitive objects: summary
- •5.5 Secondary genitives and secondary locatives
- •5.5.1 Basics
- •5.5.2 Secondary genitive
- •5.5.3 Secondary locative
- •5.6 Instrumental case
- •5.6.1 Basics
- •5.6.2 Modal instrumentals
- •5.6.3 Aspectual instrumentals
- •5.6.4 Agentive instrumentals
- •5.6.5 Summary
- •5.7 Case: context and variants
- •5.7.1 Jakobson’s case system: general
- •5.7.2 Jakobson’s case system: the analysis
- •5.7.3 Syncretism
- •5.7.4 Secondary genitive and secondary locative as cases?
- •5.8 Voice: reflexive verbs, passive participles
- •5.8.1 Basics
- •5.8.2 Functional equivalents of passive
- •5.8.3 Reflexive verbs
- •5.8.4 Present passive participles
- •5.8.5 Past passive participles
- •5.8.6 Passives and near-passives
- •5.9 Agreement
- •5.9.1 Basics
- •5.9.2 Agreement with implicit arguments, complications
- •5.9.3 Agreement with overt arguments: special contexts
- •5.9.4 Agreement with conjoined nouns
- •5.9.5 Agreement with comitative phrases
- •5.9.6 Agreement with quantifier phrases
- •5.10 Subordinate clauses and infinitives
- •5.10.1 Basics
- •5.10.2 Finite clauses
- •5.10.4 The free infinitive construction (without overt modal)
- •5.10.5 The free infinitive construction (with negative existential pronouns)
- •5.10.6 The dative-with-infinitive construction (overt modal)
- •5.10.7 Infinitives with modal hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.8 Infinitives with hosts of intentional modality (nominative subject)
- •5.10.9 Infinitives with aspectual hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.10 Infinitives with hosts of imposed modality (accusative or dative object)
- •5.10.11 Final constructions
- •5.10.12 Summary of infinitive constructions
- •6 Mood, tense, and aspect
- •6.1 States and change, times, alternatives
- •6.2 Mood
- •6.2.1 Modality in general
- •6.2.2 Mands and the imperative
- •6.2.3 Conditional constructions
- •6.2.4 Dependent irrealis mood: possibility, volitive, optative
- •6.2.5 Dependent irrealis mood: epistemology
- •6.2.6 Dependent irrealis mood: reference
- •6.2.7 Independent irrealis moods
- •6.2.8 Syntax and semantics of modal predicates
- •6.3 Tense
- •6.3.1 Predicates and times, in general
- •6.3.2 Tense in finite adjectival and adverbial clauses
- •6.3.3 Tense in argument clauses
- •6.3.4 Shifts of perspective in tense: historical present
- •6.3.5 Shifts of perspective in tense: resultative
- •6.3.6 Tense in participles
- •6.3.7 Aspectual-temporal-modal particles
- •6.4 Aspect and lexicon
- •6.4.1 Aspect made simple
- •6.4.2 Tests for aspect membership
- •6.4.3 Aspect and morphology: the core strategy
- •6.4.4 Aspect and morphology: other strategies and groups
- •6.4.5 Aspect pairs
- •6.4.6 Intrinsic lexical aspect
- •6.4.7 Verbs of motion
- •6.5 Aspect and context
- •6.5.1 Preliminaries
- •6.5.2 Past ‘‘aoristic” narrative: perfective
- •6.5.3 Retrospective (‘‘perfect”) contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.4 The essentialist context: imperfective
- •6.5.5 Progressive context: imperfective
- •6.5.6 Durative context: imperfective
- •6.5.7 Iterative context: imperfective
- •6.5.8 The future context: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.9 Exemplary potential context: perfective
- •6.5.10 Infinitive contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.11 Retrospective on aspect
- •6.6 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.1 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.2 Measured intervals
- •6.6.3 Time units
- •6.6.4 Time units: variations on the basic patterns
- •6.6.14 Frequency
- •6.6.15 Some lexical adverbs
- •6.6.16 Conjunctions
- •6.6.17 Summary
- •7 The presentation of information
- •7.1 Basics
- •7.2 Intonation
- •7.2.1 Basics
- •7.2.2 Intonation contours
- •7.3 Word order
- •7.3.1 General
- •7.3.6 Word order without subjects
- •7.3.7 Summary of word-order patterns of predicates and arguments
- •7.3.8 Emphatic stress and word order
- •7.3.9 Word order within argument phrases
- •7.3.10 Word order in speech
- •7.4 Negation
- •7.4.1 Preliminaries
- •7.4.2 Distribution and scope of negation
- •7.4.3 Negation and other phenomena
- •7.5 Questions
- •7.5.1 Preliminaries
- •7.5.2 Content questions
- •7.5.3 Polarity questions and answers
- •7.6 Lexical information operators
- •7.6.1 Conjunctions
- •7.6.2 Contrastive conjunctions
- •Bibliography
- •Index
Mood, tense, and aspect 419
expected to have occurred on some delimited occasion ([143]):30
[143]-- Ds dpzkb<if> rk/xb?
--Ytn, yt dpzk<pf> .
--Did you take the keys?
--No, I didn’t [though I acknowledge that I could have].
The imperfective would be possible (-- Ytn, yt ,hfk<if>) in order to deny the implicit obligation or to suggest that the matter is still open.
By an extension of the concern with existence and polarity, an imperfective is appropriate when descriptive aspects of a situation are reported or questioned.
[144]Evbhfk<if> <jhbc Ktjybljdbx d cjpyfybb. Boris Leonidovich was conscious as he died.
[145]Rnj gbcfk<if> ≤Djqye b vbh≥? Who wrote War and Peace?
Here the existence and the nature of the event are taken for granted, and the attention falls on particulars, on attendant circumstances rather than on the final result.
Thus the imperfective can be used with little context to assert the existence of an activity, to comment on its polarity, or to provide descriptive detail about the flow of an activity. A perfective verb used in similar contexts would insist on change and result.
6.5.5 Progressive context: imperfective
Events can occur in sequence, or they can overlap on the same contextual occasion.31 An event that overlaps others is typically expressed by the imperfective:
[146]Z e;t dcnfdfk<if> c rhtckf, rfr pfpdjybk<pf> ntktajy.
I was already getting up from the chair, when the phone rang.
In [146], an imperfective (dcnfdƒk) is used to report an activity that is not definitively ended because it is in progress around the contextual occasion.
The Russian imperfective used in this sense is analogous to the compound progressive tense-aspect of English. As is well known, almost all instances of English progressives will be translated into Russian as imperfective.32 The converse does not hold: not every instance of a Russian imperfective will be translated into
30Chaput 1985, 1990.
31See the contrastive studies of Akimova 1984 and Kozintseva 1985.
32As an exceptional instance, Kozintseva 1985:68 cites Those three -- those three were coming in!, which is translated as the perfective in Nt nhjt -- nt nhjt nj;t djikb d rjylbnthcre/. The original context is quite specific -- it is interior monologue predicting an imminent result.
420A Reference Grammar of Russian
an English imperfective. Iteratives (§6.5.7) and duratives (§6.5.6) are the obvious cases. In addition, essential (descriptive or existential) imperfectives do not translate to progressives in English (§6.5.4: [132], [144]). The English progressive is narrower in its range than the Russian imperfective.
6.5.6 Durative context: imperfective
If an activity is expressed by the imperfective in a past-tense narrative, it cannot reach its completion (otherwise it would be perfective); the imperfective establishes the existence of some activity with the implicature that the result was not reached and would not be reached in the immediate vicinity of the contextual occasion.33 This implicature can be made explicit by adding to the sentence an accusative specification of the duration of the activity: the activity went on for this period of time, but then ceased, without reaching its conclusion.
[147]Gjckt ub,tkb Gkjnybrjdf ujhcnrf ,jqwjd lj enhf jn,bdfkf<if> yfnbcr ubnkthjdwtd. D gjcktlytq herjgfiyjq c[dfnrt dct jyb gjub,kb<pf> .
After Plotnikov died a handful of soldiers repelled the pressure of the Hitlerites until morning. In the final hand-to-hand combat they all perished.
[148]Tuj edtkb<pf> , z jcnfkcz<pf> d njq rfvjhrt jlby, ghbitk<pf> djtyysq, pfcnfdbk<pf> vtyz hfpltnmcz, nofntkmyj j,scrfk<pf> , gjnjv eitk<pf> . Z ;lfk<if> , yfdthyjt, xfcf ldf, dsdtkb<pf> yfhe;e, gjcflbkb<pf> jlyjuj d rhsnsq uhepjdbr, ghjdtpkb<pf> dctuj pf gjkdthcns yf ghjckfdktyye/ e;fcfvb Ke,zyre.
They took him away, and I remained in the place alone. A soldier came in, made me undress, searched me carefully, then left. I waited about two hours, they led me out, put me in a covered truck, and took me the half verst to the Lubianka Prison, famous for its horrors.
To know that the activity has ceased without reaching a definitive result implies an external narrative perspective. (This is in contrast to the “progressive” use of the imperfective, when the contextual occasion is internal to the activity in progress.) Accordingly, durative imperfectives can easily be sequenced in narratives between perfective events. In [147] one phase of the battle lasted until morning, then another, fateful event occurred. In [148], the delimited interval of waiting is sandwiched between events in a highly sequential narrative. Because the contextual occasion must be closed to be measured, duratives
33The familiar fact that explicit statements of duration require the verb to be imperfective (except for prefixed quantizing verbs in ghj-) needs to be repeated, for it shows that perfective aspect in Russian is not merely the end of an interval of activity; a perfective requires that no further activity be conceivable, from the perspective of the specific history at that contextual occasion. In fact, in its use of the imperfective for terminated events, Slavic is typologically unusual (Dahl 1985).
Mood, tense, and aspect 421
are nearly as sequential in force as perfectives. This is another instance in which the adage that perfective advances while imperfective retards narrative is incomplete.
A bare accusative of time normally occurs only with imperfective or anaspectual predicates. A systematic exception is perfective derivatives with the prefix ghj-, which use bare accusatives to measure a closed interval of time:
[149]Ghb,sk jy d vjyfcnshm 5 atdhfkz r dtxthyt. Gfnhbfh[ ghjujcnbk<pf> gznm<acc> lytq. Djpdhfnbkcz d Vjcrde 11 atdhfkz.
He arrived at the monastery on February 5 at vespers. The patriarch stayed five days. He returned to Moscow February 11.
[150]Ghjcgfk<pf> z ldflwfnm ldf xfcf gjlhzl. I slept twenty-two hours straight.
[151]Ds pyftnt, xnj yfi j,obq lheu <. C. Repby, e rjnjhjuj z ujcnbk<if> ltcznm<acc> lytq, htprj jnhbwfntkmyj jnyjcbncz r K. Njkcnjve.
As you are aware, our mutual friend B. S. Kuzin, with whom I stayed for ten days, is very negatively disposed to L. Tolstoy.
These perfective derivatives in ghj- present the interval as closed, without the lingering possibility that the activity could continue; they normally place the event in narrative sequence with others. An imperfective would merely assert the existence of an activity: in [151], ujcnbk ltcznm lytq ‘he was a guest for ten days’ -- and could have been a guest for longer; jy cgfk ’df xfcf ‘he slept two hours’ -- he could have slept more.34 Only exceptionally can other perfectives be combined with an accusative expressing duration, as in:
[152]Jnlj[yed<pf> xfcjr, lheujq, vs dyjdm ldbyekbcm dgthtl, ujybvst vexbntkmyjq ;f;ljq.
Having rested an hour or so, we again moved forward, driven by torturous thirst.
Except for such occasional deviations and the systematic exception of prefixed perfectives in ghj- and gj-, the ability to occur with an accusative expression of duration is a test that positively identifies imperfectives.
6.5.7 Iterative context: imperfective
Imperfectives can be used to report general states or habits -- situations that seem true at all times -- and they are used to express an open series of actions that repeat, when each token of the series by itself might be perfective if it were expressed as a single event. Iterative contexts can be signaled by a variety of lexical adverbs (xƒcnj ‘often’, bph†lrf ‘only occasionally’) and phrases (gj ce,,j´nfv ‘on Saturdays’, rƒ;le/ ytl†k/ ‘each week’). Or, the use of an
34 Shakhmatov (1925) calls this “completion of the duration of the activity.”
422A Reference Grammar of Russian
imperfective with conjunctions such as rjulƒ ‘when’ can impute an iterative reading to the context.
[153]Gj enhfv r j,ot;bnbzv {ghb[jlbkb<if pst> ghb[jlzn<if prs> } ;tyobys bp lthtdtym, jyb {ghbyjcbkb<if pst> ghbyjczn<if prs> } njgktyjt vjkjrj, z
{gjregfk<if pst> gjregf/<if prs> } xtndthnbyre rf;lsq ltym yf pfdnhfr.
In the mornings women from the villages {came come} to the dormitories, they
{carried carry} warm milk, every day I {bought buy} a quart for breakfast.
Iterative situations can be situated in the past or present ([153]) or the future ([154]):
[154]Vs vtxnfkb, rfr yfxbyfz c dtcys rf;lsq ltym ,eltv<fut> gjkexfnm gj zbxre. We dreamed how, beginning in spring, each day we would get an egg.
Iteratives -- particularly discrete iteratives, each of whose sub-events is completed -- are mixed in terms of narrative function. As imperfectives, iteratives present a scene, a habit. But in a block of iterative imperfectives, each subevent can be understood as sequentialized with respect to other sub-events. A rich example is [155], in which, further, a set of three perfectives (jnrfpƒkcz, gjnh†,jdfk, cnƒk) in the middle creates a shift in the habits.
[155]Lt;ehcndj yf ,jkmijq ljhjut ,skj jxtym bynthtcysv pfyznbtv. Vs hfcgjkfufkbcm<if> yf ghjnz;tybb gjkenjhf rbkjvtnhjd gj dctq ljhjut.
{kjgws vthpkb<if> b gjlghsubdfkb<if> yf cytue, gthtrkbrfkbcm<if> , xnj,s yt gjnthznm cdzpb lheu c lheujv, b d yfcnegbdib[ cevthrf[ ghjhjxbkb<if> dthye/ cvthnm djj,hf;tyb/ pfgjplfdituj genybrf. <. . .>
Ghb vyt rjkjybcns ybrjulf yt [ekbufybkb<if> b yt geufkb<if> gentitcndtyybrjd, yj ,tp vtyz ljgecrfkb<if> ifkjcnb, b Pfljhjd crjhj lf;t jnrfpfkcz<pf> jn htdjkmdthf b gjnht,jdfk<pf> , xnj,s z ,sdfk yf ljhjut j,zpfntkmyj. Z cnfk<pf> ds[jlbnm ghb rf;ljq rjvfylbhjdrt jnhzlf, yj htdjkmdth jnlfdfk<if> dct ;t Pfljhjde, xnj,s yt kbibnm tuj pfcke;tyyjuj yfckf;ltybz.
Rjulf gjrfpsdfkcz<if> yfi Vfksi, vs tuj dcnhtxfkb<if> rhbrjv: -- Cnjq!
Herb ddth[!
The watch on the highway was a very interesting occupation. We distributed ourselves over a kilometer and a half along the road. The lads were cold and they hopped around in the snow, shouted back and forth, in order not to lose contact, and in the approaching darkness they foretold certain death to the imagination of a belated traveler <. . .>
In my presence the colonists never acted up and intimidated the travelers, but when I wasn’t there they engaged in some shenanigans, and Zadorov soon refused