
- •Contents
- •1 Russian
- •1.1 The Russian language
- •1.1.1 Russian then and now
- •1.1.2 Levels of language
- •1.2 Describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.1 Conventions of notation
- •1.2.2 Abbreviations
- •1.2.3 Dictionaries and grammars
- •1.2.4 Statistics and corpora
- •1.2.5 Strategies of describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.6 Two fundamental concepts of (Russian) grammar
- •1.3 Writing Russian
- •1.3.1 The Russian Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.2 A brief history of the Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.3 Etymology of letters
- •1.3.4 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (basics)
- •1.3.5 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (refinements)
- •1.3.6 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (lexical idiosyncrasies)
- •1.3.7 Transliteration
- •2 Sounds
- •2.1 Sounds
- •2.2 Vowels
- •2.2.1 Stressed vowels
- •2.2.3 Vowel duration
- •2.2.4 Unstressed vowels
- •2.2.5 Unpaired consonants [ˇs ˇz c] and unstressed vocalism
- •2.2.6 Post-tonic soft vocalism
- •2.2.7 Unstressed vowels in sequence
- •2.2.8 Unstressed vowels in borrowings
- •2.3 Consonants
- •2.3.1 Classification of consonants
- •2.3.2 Palatalization of consonants
- •2.3.3 The distribution of palatalized consonants
- •2.3.4 Palatalization assimilation
- •2.3.5 The glide [j]
- •2.3.6 Affricates
- •2.3.7 Soft palatal fricatives
- •2.3.8 Geminate consonants
- •2.3.9 Voicing of consonants
- •2.4 Phonological variation
- •2.4.1 General
- •2.4.2 Phonological variation: idiomaticity
- •2.4.3 Phonological variation: systemic factors
- •2.4.4 Phonological variation: phonostylistics and Old Muscovite pronunciation
- •2.5 Morpholexical alternations
- •2.5.1 Preliminaries
- •2.5.2 Consonant grades
- •2.5.3 Types of softness
- •2.5.4 Vowel grades
- •2.5.5 Morphophonemic {o}
- •3 Inflectional morphology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Conjugation of verbs
- •3.2.1 Verbal categories
- •3.2.2 Conjugation classes
- •3.2.3 Stress patterns
- •3.2.4 Conjugation classes: I-Conjugation
- •3.2.5 Conjugation classes: suffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.6 Conjugation classes: quasisuffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.7 Stress in verbs: retrospective
- •3.2.8 Irregularities in conjugation
- •3.2.9 Secondary imperfectivization
- •3.3 Declension of pronouns
- •3.3.1 Personal pronouns
- •3.3.2 Third-person pronouns
- •3.3.3 Determiners (demonstrative, possessive, adjectival pronouns)
- •3.4 Quantifiers
- •3.5 Adjectives
- •3.5.1 Adjectives
- •3.5.2 Predicative (‘‘short”) adjectives
- •3.5.3 Mixed adjectives and surnames
- •3.5.4 Comparatives and superlatives
- •3.6 Declension of nouns
- •3.6.1 Categories and declension classes of nouns
- •3.6.2 Hard, soft, and unpaired declensions
- •3.6.3 Accentual patterns
- •3.6.8 Declension and gender of gradation
- •3.6.9 Accentual paradigms
- •3.7 Complications in declension
- •3.7.1 Indeclinable common nouns
- •3.7.2 Acronyms
- •3.7.3 Compounds
- •3.7.4 Appositives
- •3.7.5 Names
- •4 Arguments
- •4.1 Argument phrases
- •4.1.1 Basics
- •4.1.2 Reference of arguments
- •4.1.3 Morphological categories of nouns: gender
- •4.1.4 Gender: unpaired ‘‘masculine” nouns
- •4.1.5 Gender: common gender
- •4.1.6 Morphological categories of nouns: animacy
- •4.1.7 Morphological categories of nouns: number
- •4.1.8 Number: pluralia tantum, singularia tantum
- •4.1.9 Number: figurative uses of number
- •4.1.10 Morphological categories of nouns: case
- •4.2 Prepositions
- •4.2.1 Preliminaries
- •4.2.2 Ligature {o}
- •4.2.3 Case government
- •4.3 Quantifiers
- •4.3.1 Preliminaries
- •4.3.2 General numerals
- •4.3.3 Paucal numerals
- •4.3.5 Preposed quantified noun
- •4.3.6 Complex numerals
- •4.3.7 Fractions
- •4.3.8 Collectives
- •4.3.9 Approximates
- •4.3.10 Numerative (counting) forms of selected nouns
- •4.3.12 Quantifier (numeral) cline
- •4.4 Internal arguments and modifiers
- •4.4.1 General
- •4.4.2 Possessors
- •4.4.3 Possessive adjectives of unique nouns
- •4.4.4 Agreement of adjectives and participles
- •4.4.5 Relative clauses
- •4.4.6 Participles
- •4.4.7 Comparatives
- •4.4.8 Event nouns: introduction
- •4.4.9 Semantics of event nouns
- •4.4.10 Arguments of event nouns
- •4.5 Reference in text: nouns, pronouns, and ellipsis
- •4.5.1 Basics
- •4.5.2 Common nouns in text
- •4.5.3 Third-person pronouns
- •4.5.4 Ellipsis (‘‘zero” pronouns)
- •4.5.5 Second-person pronouns and address
- •4.5.6 Names
- •4.6 Demonstrative pronouns
- •4.7 Reflexive pronouns
- •4.7.1 Basics
- •4.7.2 Autonomous arguments
- •4.7.3 Non-immediate sites
- •4.7.4 Special predicate--argument relations: existential, quantifying, modal, experiential predicates
- •4.7.5 Unattached reflexives
- •4.7.6 Special predicate--argument relations: direct objects
- •4.7.7 Special predicate--argument relations: passives
- •4.7.8 Autonomous domains: event argument phrases
- •4.7.9 Autonomous domains: non-finite verbs
- •4.7.12 Retrospective on reflexives
- •4.8 Quantifying pronouns and adjectives
- •4.8.1 Preliminaries: interrogatives as indefinite pronouns
- •4.8.7 Summary
- •4.8.9 Universal adjectives
- •5 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1.1 Predicates and arguments, in general
- •5.1.2 Predicate aspectuality and modality
- •5.1.3 Aspectuality and modality in context
- •5.1.4 Predicate information structure
- •5.1.5 Information structure in context
- •5.1.6 The concept of subject and the concept of object
- •5.1.7 Typology of predicates
- •5.2 Predicative adjectives and nouns
- •5.2.1 General
- •5.2.2 Modal co-predicates
- •5.2.3 Aspectual co-predicates
- •5.2.4 Aspectual and modal copular predicatives
- •5.2.5 Copular constructions: instrumental
- •5.2.6 Copular adjectives: predicative (short) form vs. nominative (long) form
- •5.2.9 Predicatives in non-finite clauses
- •5.2.10 Summary: case usage in predicatives
- •5.3 Quantifying predicates and genitive subjects
- •5.3.1 Basics
- •5.3.2 Clausal quantifiers and subject quantifying genitive
- •5.3.3 Subject quantifying genitive without quantifiers
- •5.3.4 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: basic paradigm
- •5.3.5 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates
- •5.3.6 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: reference
- •5.3.8 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates and reference
- •5.3.9 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: context
- •5.3.10 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: summary
- •5.4 Quantified (genitive) objects
- •5.4.1 Basics
- •5.4.2 Governed genitive
- •5.4.3 Partitive and metric genitive
- •5.4.4 Object genitive of negation
- •5.4.5 Genitive objects: summary
- •5.5 Secondary genitives and secondary locatives
- •5.5.1 Basics
- •5.5.2 Secondary genitive
- •5.5.3 Secondary locative
- •5.6 Instrumental case
- •5.6.1 Basics
- •5.6.2 Modal instrumentals
- •5.6.3 Aspectual instrumentals
- •5.6.4 Agentive instrumentals
- •5.6.5 Summary
- •5.7 Case: context and variants
- •5.7.1 Jakobson’s case system: general
- •5.7.2 Jakobson’s case system: the analysis
- •5.7.3 Syncretism
- •5.7.4 Secondary genitive and secondary locative as cases?
- •5.8 Voice: reflexive verbs, passive participles
- •5.8.1 Basics
- •5.8.2 Functional equivalents of passive
- •5.8.3 Reflexive verbs
- •5.8.4 Present passive participles
- •5.8.5 Past passive participles
- •5.8.6 Passives and near-passives
- •5.9 Agreement
- •5.9.1 Basics
- •5.9.2 Agreement with implicit arguments, complications
- •5.9.3 Agreement with overt arguments: special contexts
- •5.9.4 Agreement with conjoined nouns
- •5.9.5 Agreement with comitative phrases
- •5.9.6 Agreement with quantifier phrases
- •5.10 Subordinate clauses and infinitives
- •5.10.1 Basics
- •5.10.2 Finite clauses
- •5.10.4 The free infinitive construction (without overt modal)
- •5.10.5 The free infinitive construction (with negative existential pronouns)
- •5.10.6 The dative-with-infinitive construction (overt modal)
- •5.10.7 Infinitives with modal hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.8 Infinitives with hosts of intentional modality (nominative subject)
- •5.10.9 Infinitives with aspectual hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.10 Infinitives with hosts of imposed modality (accusative or dative object)
- •5.10.11 Final constructions
- •5.10.12 Summary of infinitive constructions
- •6 Mood, tense, and aspect
- •6.1 States and change, times, alternatives
- •6.2 Mood
- •6.2.1 Modality in general
- •6.2.2 Mands and the imperative
- •6.2.3 Conditional constructions
- •6.2.4 Dependent irrealis mood: possibility, volitive, optative
- •6.2.5 Dependent irrealis mood: epistemology
- •6.2.6 Dependent irrealis mood: reference
- •6.2.7 Independent irrealis moods
- •6.2.8 Syntax and semantics of modal predicates
- •6.3 Tense
- •6.3.1 Predicates and times, in general
- •6.3.2 Tense in finite adjectival and adverbial clauses
- •6.3.3 Tense in argument clauses
- •6.3.4 Shifts of perspective in tense: historical present
- •6.3.5 Shifts of perspective in tense: resultative
- •6.3.6 Tense in participles
- •6.3.7 Aspectual-temporal-modal particles
- •6.4 Aspect and lexicon
- •6.4.1 Aspect made simple
- •6.4.2 Tests for aspect membership
- •6.4.3 Aspect and morphology: the core strategy
- •6.4.4 Aspect and morphology: other strategies and groups
- •6.4.5 Aspect pairs
- •6.4.6 Intrinsic lexical aspect
- •6.4.7 Verbs of motion
- •6.5 Aspect and context
- •6.5.1 Preliminaries
- •6.5.2 Past ‘‘aoristic” narrative: perfective
- •6.5.3 Retrospective (‘‘perfect”) contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.4 The essentialist context: imperfective
- •6.5.5 Progressive context: imperfective
- •6.5.6 Durative context: imperfective
- •6.5.7 Iterative context: imperfective
- •6.5.8 The future context: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.9 Exemplary potential context: perfective
- •6.5.10 Infinitive contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.11 Retrospective on aspect
- •6.6 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.1 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.2 Measured intervals
- •6.6.3 Time units
- •6.6.4 Time units: variations on the basic patterns
- •6.6.14 Frequency
- •6.6.15 Some lexical adverbs
- •6.6.16 Conjunctions
- •6.6.17 Summary
- •7 The presentation of information
- •7.1 Basics
- •7.2 Intonation
- •7.2.1 Basics
- •7.2.2 Intonation contours
- •7.3 Word order
- •7.3.1 General
- •7.3.6 Word order without subjects
- •7.3.7 Summary of word-order patterns of predicates and arguments
- •7.3.8 Emphatic stress and word order
- •7.3.9 Word order within argument phrases
- •7.3.10 Word order in speech
- •7.4 Negation
- •7.4.1 Preliminaries
- •7.4.2 Distribution and scope of negation
- •7.4.3 Negation and other phenomena
- •7.5 Questions
- •7.5.1 Preliminaries
- •7.5.2 Content questions
- •7.5.3 Polarity questions and answers
- •7.6 Lexical information operators
- •7.6.1 Conjunctions
- •7.6.2 Contrastive conjunctions
- •Bibliography
- •Index
Arguments 195
(wtksv) b itcnb ldtcnb cjhjr ctlmvsv rjvyfns<gen sg> ‘to three (wholes) and six two hundred forty-sevenths of the room’; itcnm c gjkjdbyjq rjvyfns<gen sg> ‘six and a half rooms’; nhb c xtndthnm/ vtnhf<gen sg> ‘three and a quarter meters’.
A distinct style is used for reading decimals. The lowest exponent can be explicitly read, for example, ‘3.18 grams’: (jcnfdfkjcm) nhb (wtks[) b djctvyflwfnm cjns[ uhfvvf, but in scientific style it would be more common to read the numeral without ordinals, as (jcnfdfkjcm) nhb (wtks[) b djctvyflwfnm uhfvvf. An initial zero before the decimal point is yekm, which declines; zeroes to the right of the decimal point are read as invariant yjkm: jn yekz yjkm yjkm itcnb uhfvvf ‘from 0.006 gram’; c nhtvz (wtksvb) b yjkm djctvm/ rbkjuhfvvf ‘with 3.08 kilograms’.
Some unusual numerals contain an etymological prefix gjk- ‘half ’. ‘One and a half ’, etymologically ‘half of the second’, behaves like a paucal. The direct cases distinguish gender and take the genitive singular of the noun: msc gjknjhƒ cnjkƒ ‘one and a half tables’, nt gjknjhƒ jryƒ ‘one and a half windows’, fem gjknjhß cnjhjyß ‘one and a half sides’. Gj´knjhf, with initial stress, is used with pluralia tantum: gj´knjhf cénjr ‘a day and a half ’.30 There is a single form for all oblique cases in all genders; nouns are genitive plural: bp gjkénjhf ,enßkjr ‘out of one and a half bottles’. ‘One hundred and a half ’, etymologically ‘half of the second hundred’, distinguishes two forms: direct (nom=acc) gjknjhƒcnf, implying genitive plural of the noun ([102]), and oblique gjkénjhfcnf, implying oblique case by agreement ([103]):
[102]Vyt ldflwfnm gznm ktn: kbwj vjt b abuehe vyjubt [dfkzn. Ytlehyj tp;e dth[jv b cnhtkz/, gjgfle c gjkenjhfcnf<gen> ifujd<gen> d cnfrfy bkb z,kjrj. I’m twenty-five: people admire my looks and my figure. I’m not too shoddy at riding and shooting: I can hit a glass or an apple from a hundred and fifty paces.
[103]Gjvjufnm yf re[yt --- эnj vsnm gjcele pf dctvb gjkenjhfcnf<ins> gjcnjzkmwfvb<ins> .
Helping in the kitchen means washing dishes for all hundred and fifty lodgers.
4.3.8 Collectives
Russian has a distinct class of collective numerals, used for groups of individuals: ldj´t ‘pair, twosome’, gz´nthj ‘quintet, fivesome’, extending up to ltcz´nthj ‘tensome’.31 They are more frequent for small than for large groups -- ldj´t is over ten times more frequent than c†vthj ‘sevensome’, which in turn is ten times more frequent than dj´cmvthj. Whether collectives are used rather than ordinary numerals depends primarily on the noun that is quantified and secondarily on
30 Zalizniak 1977[a]:66. |
31 Vinogradov 1947:308--11, Mel chuk 1985[a]:376. |
196A Reference Grammar of Russian
the context. Collectives are used regularly with: adjectival substantives (ldjt xfcjds[ ‘two sentries’); masculine animate nouns belonging to Declension<II> (ldjt ve;xby ‘two men’); nouns describing membership in groups defined by national identity or social role (nhjt ckjdfrjd ‘three Slovaks’, ldjt cneltynjd ‘two students’); children, when counted in relation to the parents (jy ;tyfn b bvttn xtndths[ ytcjdthityyjktnyb[ ltntq ‘he is married with four minor children’). Collectives are used with inanimate pluralia tantum, at least for low numbers in the direct cases: only {ldjt xtndthj} cenjr ‘{two four} days’. Higher than paucals, regular numbers are used: occasionally gznthj cenjr ‘five
days’ but much more frequently, gznm cenjr (93% on the web <31.X.02>). Regular numbers are used in oblique cases: ghb gjvjob lde[ ( ldjb[) obgwjd ‘using two
pairs of pliers’, c nhtvz yj;ybwfvb ‘with three pairs of scissors’. Paired items, for some speakers, can be expressed by collectives, but others prefer to use gfhf: ldjt cfgju ‘two pairs of boots’ or ldt gfhs {cfgju ,h/r gthxfnjr} ‘two pairs of {boots trousers gloves}’.
Aside from the lexical groups just mentioned, collectives are generally used
only for groups including men. Collectives are avoided if the group is composed exclusively of women: ldt ;tyobys ‘two women’, not ldjt ;tyoby, except in
newer, colloquial language (jnyjcbntkmyj dct[ gznths[ ltdbw ‘with respect to the whole fivesome of girls’). With nouns that can use either collectives or ordinary numerals, the collective focuses on the fact that the group exists (a fact which, in [104], explains how the uncle behaved):
[104]Ntgthm e ytuj ,skj gznthj ltntq, b эnf ljk;yjcnm tuj ybrfr yt ecnhfbdfkf. By now he had five children, and so that occupation was no longer adequate.
The regular numeral suggests that the entities are individuals ([105]):
[105]Dslfkb gznm rfhnjxtr --- yf vjb[ vkflib[ ctcnth Vfie b Rfn/ b yf nht[ ltntq ,hfnf Dkflbvbhf.
Five cards were issued --- for my younger sisters Masha and Katia and for my brother Vladimir’s three children.
In the accusative, collectives express animacy ([106]), and not only for small quantities:
[106]Jy hf,jnfk yt pf ldjb[, f pf ltcznths[.
He did the work not just of two, but of ten people.
4.3.9 Approximates
Quantifiers such as cnj´kmrj ‘so much’, vyj´uj ‘much’, ytvyj´uj ‘a little’, vƒkj ‘little’ assert the existence of some quantity that is evaluated against an implicit standard: as greater (vyj´uj) or less (vƒkj) or the same (cnj´kmrj and crj´kmrj -- the
Arguments 197
question form that asks what the quantity is equal to). These quantifiers can also function as adverbs, when they do not govern a noun and modify a verb: vyjuj vjkbkfcm ‘she prayed a lot’.
In oblique cases, the quantifier and the noun and any modifiers go into the oblique case. A count noun is plural: vyjubvb cbkfvb ‘with many forces’, crjkmrbvb ltymufvb ‘with how much money’. If the noun is a mass noun, it is singular and the quantifier has a singular declension: ,tp vyjujq cbks ‘without much force’, crjkmrjq dfk/njq ‘with how much money’. Vƒkj ‘little’, ytvƒkj ‘not a little’ and the comparatives v†ymit ‘less’, ,j´kmit ‘more’ do not decline and are not used where an oblique case would be called for, except in the idioms: ,tp vfkjuj ‘only a little less than’, (yfxbyfnmcz) c vfkjuj ‘(to begin) with a little’. The adjective vƒksq ‘small, slight’ does occur in oblique cases: yt hj;lfkf b vfkjuj pderf ‘[the machine] did not produce even the slightest sound’, c vfksv cjlth;fybtv ehfyf ‘with trace amounts of uranium’.
Alongside of the pure quantifier vyj´uj there is a parallel plural adjective vyj´ubt in the direct cases. Vyj´uj points to the existence of a quantity of undifferentiated entities, as opposed to the possibility that no entities were involved. Vyj´ubt individuates, inviting a contrast among individuals -- many did, others did not ([107]):
[107]D Vjcrde gjyft[fkj vyjuj rbnfqwtd. Chtlb yb[ ,skb {j Ib Vby, Xfy Rfqib b vyjubt cjhfnybrb Vfj Lpэleyf.
Many Chinese arrived in Moscow. Among them were Ho Chi Minh, Chiang Kai-shek, and many comrades of Mao Zedong.
Vyj´uj expresses animacy obligatorily, y†crjkmrj ‘some’ does so three-quarters of the time. The nom=acc y†crjkmrj establishes existence (in [108], there will now be expertise); the acc=gen y†crjkmrb[ focuses on the effect on individuals, such as the violence in [109]:
[108]Ghbdktrkb ytcrjkmrj<nom=acc> jgsnys[ cgtwbfkbcnjd. [They] have brought in some experienced specialists.
[109]Rfpfrb e,bkb ytcrjkmrb[<acc=gen> ltvjycnhfynjd. Cossacks killed some of the demonstrators.
4.3.10 Numerative (counting) forms of selected nouns
Some nouns have distinct, archaic, forms when they are used with quantifiers.32 Certain nouns belonging to Declension<Ia> use the null form of the genitive plural in combination with quantifiers, but the explicit ending {-ov} for other genitives: itcnyflwfnm rbkjuhfvv ‘sixteen kilograms’, lj lde[cjn rbkjuhfvv
‘up to two hundred kilograms’ but chtlb эnb[ rbkjuhfvvjd ‘among those
32 Worth 1959:fn. 9, Mel chuk 1985[a]:430--37.

198A Reference Grammar of Russian
Table 4.7 Alternative plurals (selected numerals, genitive and dative cases)
|
|
|
percentage |
|
|
percentage |
|
xtkjdtr |
k/ltq |
xtkjdtr |
xtkjdtrfv |
k/lzv |
xtkjdtrfv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xtnsht[ |
18,800 |
476 |
98% |
67 |
116 |
37% |
xtnshtv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gznb |
14,100 |
143 |
99% |
81 |
119 |
41% |
ltcznb |
9,380 |
389 |
96% |
83 |
17 |
83% |
gznbltcznb |
4,140 |
75 |
98% |
6 |
9 |
40% |
cnf |
12,400 |
160 |
99% |
110 |
3 |
97% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kilograms’ (§3.6.4).33 The measures of modern science are similar: ufecc(jd) ‘gausses’, fyucnhtv(jd) ‘angstroms’, jv(jd) ‘ohms’, htynuty(jd) ‘roentgens’.
Two high-frequency nouns use two different stems in the plural.
While the general plural of xtkjd†r is k/´lb, plural forms of xtkjd†r are used in quantifying contexts. As a genitive plural with the ending {-º}, xtkjd†r is used with true numerals: itcnmcjn ldflwfnm gznm xtkjdtr ,skb gjldthuyenj tgbnbvmzv ‘six hundred twenty-five people were subjected to performing penances’. Both xtkjd†r and k/l†q are used with the approximate quantifiers cnj´kmrj, y†crjkmrj, cnj´kmrj. In ytcrjkmrj xtkjdtr gjnjyekj ‘some people drowned’, xtkjd†r establishes the existence of an event of drowning. K/l†q indicates that the people are individuals, each with a separate history: crjkmrj k/ltq jcnfkbcm ,s ;bds ‘how many people might have remained alive’. With vyj´uj ‘many’, vƒkj ‘few’, ytvƒkj ‘not a few’, k/l†q is used by a wide margin (on the web, 97% k/ltq <31.X.02>), as in [110]:
[110]Yj tcnm ytvfkj k/ltq, rjnjhst cxbnf/n gj-lheujve.
But there are a fair number of people who think otherwise.
K/l†q tends to be used with mille quantifiers more than xtkjd†r. The nominative-accusative vbkkbj´ys overwhelmingly uses k/l†q (97% k/l†q on the web <31.X.02>). The genitive vbkkbj´yjd, however, prefers xtkjd†r (only 30% k/l†q on the web <31.X.02>). K/l†q is also used with groupings of people, ltcznrb nfkfynkbds[ k/ltq ‘dozens of talented people’. Genitives that are not quantifying have only k/l†q: ghj,ktvs ;bpyb k/ltq ‘problems of people’s life’, njkgf k/ltq ‘crowd of people’.
With general numerals in oblique cases other than the genitive, either noun can be used with numerals, to judge a search of dative forms reported in Table 4.7 (web, <31.X.02>). Table 4.7 reminds us that xtkjd†r is close to universal with
33 Vorontsova 1976:136--37.
|
|
Arguments 199 |
Table 4.8 Numerative plurals: ktn, xtkjdtr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
context |
ujls/ktnf |
k/lb/xtkjdtr |
|
|
|
plural oblique, |
r ldflwfnb ujlfv; jnlfktyyst |
gjvj;tn lf;t ltcznb k/lzv |
non-genitive |
ltcznm/ ujlfvb |
[individuated] / gjyhfdbncz |
|
|
gznb xtkjdtrfv [existential] |
adnominal to lexical noun |
k/lb itcnbltczns[ ujljd |
ghj,ktvs ;bpyb k/ltq; njkgf |
|
[individuated] / d ext,ybrf[ |
k/ltq |
|
nt[ ktn; ghfrnbrf ghjiks[ |
|
|
ktn; rjkbxtcndj ktn |
|
|
[existential] |
|
quantifiers vfkj, ytvfkj, |
vyjuj ktn |
vyjuj k/ltq, ytvfkj k/ltq |
vyjuj, ytvyjuj |
|
|
mille numerals vbkkbjy |
vbkkbjys ktn yfpfl |
320 vbkkbjyjd k/ltq |
group quantifiers ltcznjr, |
cjnyb ktn |
ltcznrb nfkfynkbds[ k/ltq |
cjnyz |
|
|
approximate quantifiers |
cnjkmrj ktn ghjikj |
crjkmrj k/ltq jcnfkbcm ,s |
cnjkmrj, ytcrjkmrj, |
|
;bds [individuated] / |
crjkmrj |
|
ytcrjkmrj xtkjdtr gjnjyekj |
|
|
[existential] |
general numerals |
ldflwfnm ktn; ,jktt lde[ ktn |
ldflwfnm xtkjdtr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
genitive forms of numerals. With oblique numerals, forms of k/´lb allow the people to be viewed as separate individuals ([111]); forms of xtkjd†r focus on the quantity as such ([112]):
[111]Tckb vjz rybuf gjvj;tn lf;t ltcznb k/lzv, z e;t ,ele cxfcnkbd. If my book should help just ten people, I will be happy.
[112]Yfif vepsrf gjyhfdbncz gznb xtkjdtrfv bp cjnyb. Our music will please five people out of a hundred.
Uj´ls ‘years’ is used in many contexts, including in oblique cases with numerals, r ldflwfnb ujlfv ‘to twenty years’, jnlfktyyst ltcznm/ ujlfvb ‘distanced by ten years’. K†n is used for almost any genitive plural: with quantifiers of all kinds, vyjuj ktn ‘many years’, lj ldflwfnb ktn ‘up to twenty years’, vbkkbjys ktn yfpfl ‘millions of years ago’, cnjkmrj ktn ghjikj ‘so many years have passed’; with adnominal genitives that are not quantifying, d ext,ybrf[ nt[ ktn ‘in the textbooks of those years’, ghfrnbrf ghjiks[ ktn ‘the practice of recent years’; and in idioms with the preposition c defining the start of an interval: c {ltncrb[/ys[ nt[} ktn ‘from {childhood young those} years’. K†n is used in discussions of age, which is often measured with numbers: dsukzltkf cnfhit cdjb[ ktn ‘she looked older than her years’, ks;ybrb chtlyb[ ktn ‘skiers of
200A Reference Grammar of Russian
middle age’. The plural uj´ls can have the sense of a series of years, such as a decade: itcnbltcznst ujls ‘the sixties’, d gthdst ujls htdjk/wbb ‘in the first years of the revolution’, and in this sense it can appear in the genitive: k/lb itcnbltczns[ ujljd ‘people of the sixties’. The genitive ujlj´d is also used if years are understood as individuated, nhfubxtcrbt cj,snbz 1937--1938 ujljd ‘the tragic events of the years of 1937--1938’, or if the genitive is governed by a verb: yjdsq ghjwtcc d kexitv ckexft gjnht,etn tot ujljd bcgsnfybq ‘the new process, even at best, will require still more years of testing’.
Xtkjd†r and uj´l are used with numerals that call for the singular form: ldflwfnm jlby xtkjdtr ‘twenty-one people’, c ldflwfnm/ jlybv xtkjdtrjv ‘with twenty-one people’, nhb xtkjdtrf ‘three people’, xtnsht ujlf ‘four years’, lj ldflwfnb jlyjuj ujlf ‘up to twenty-one years’, but lj djphfcnf xtnsht[ ktn ‘up to the age of four years’.
The usage and examples discussed above are summarized in Table 4.8. K†n is used broadly as a genitive plural, not only in quantifying contexts. Xtkjd†r is used in quantifying contexts (though k/l†q is not excluded), and not only as a genitive.
A small number of nouns have two genitive singular forms that differ by stress. The regular genitive is used in most contexts. The n u m e r a t i v e form with unusual stress is an archaism used with paucal numerals or fractions:
{(ldflwfnm) ldf nhb xtnsht} {ifuƒ xfcƒ hzlƒ (hz´lf) ifhƒ [archaic] hfpƒ} ‘{(twenty) two three four} {steps hours rows balls times}’; gjkjdbyf ifuƒ ‘a half step’. The regular genitive singular is stressed on the stem: jrjkj xƒcf ‘around an hour’. Numerative stress yields to the regular stress when the combination is not idiomatic: ldf gthds[ iƒuf ‘two first steps’ ldf ,tcrjytxys[ xƒcf ‘two endless hours’, ldf c gjkjdbyjq {xfcƒ ( xƒcf) iƒuf}
‘two and a half {hours steps}’.34 Pf j,t o=rb ‘on both cheeks’ (otherwise, gen sg otr∫) and dct xtnsht cnj´hjys (gen sg cnjhjyß) ‘all four sides’ are fixed idioms.35
4.3.11 Quantifiers and gj
A construction beloved among grammarians is the use of quantifiers with the preposition gj in its distributive sense: a certain quantity of things is assigned to each member of some set.36
34The pattern is a vestige of the stress in the dual of nouns with originally mobile accentuation. In mobile nouns, the accent fell on the nom=acc dual ending of msc o-stem nouns, hence ifuƒ, and on the initial syllable of fem a-stem nouns, cnj´hjy˜ > cnj´hjys (Stang 1957:76, 61).
35Vinogradov 1947:302--4.
36Vinogradov 1947:297, Bogus awski and Karolak 1970:13--14, Mel chuk 1985[a]. The historical trajectory is outlined in Bogus awski 1966:199--201, passim.
Arguments 201
Distributive phrases with gj fit in a wide range of argument positions: in positions where one might expect an accusative object ([113]), an accusative expression of frequency ([114]), or the nominative subject of an intransitive verb with existential force ([115]):
[113]Ltrfye rf;ljuj afrekmntnf hfphtibkb dpznm c cj,jq gj ldf<nom=acc> cneltynf. The dean of every faculty was permitted to take two students each.
[114]Z yfyzkcz vsnm gjcele d htcnjhfyt, gj ldtyflwfnm<nom=acc> xfcjd d ltym b gj itcnm<nom=acc> lytq d ytltk/.
I took a job washing dishes in a restaurant, twelve hours per day and six days per week.
[115]Yf rf;ljq crfvmt cbltkj gj nhb<nom=acc> cneltynf. At each bench there sat three students.
These are the same argument positions that allow the genitive of negation,37 presumably because gj, like the genitive of negation, focuses on existence rather than individuation. For the same reason, presumably, gj does not treat its accusative complement as animate with paucal numerals (gj ldf cneltynf in [113]). But gj is not limited to contexts that allow the genitive of negation. Gj phrases can be inserted in apposition to an argument including arguments of predicates in which the genitive would be problematic ([116]) and, unusually, can even substitute for a transitive subject ([117--18]):
[116]:bden cneltyns yf gthdjv rehct gj ldflwfnm<nom=acc> xtkjdtr d rjvyfnt. Students in the first year live twenty people to a room.
[117]Rf;ljuj vbybcnhf lth;fkb gjl here gj ldf<nom=acc> vfnhjcf. Each minister was held by the arms by two sailors each.
[118]D 47 depf[ эne cnbgtylb/ gjkexbkb gj jlyjve<dat> cneltyne, d 16 depf[ -- gj ldf<nom=acc> cneltynf.
In 47 schools, one student each received this scholarship, and in 16 schools --- two students each.
The case of the numeral used with gj is a favorite puzzle of Russian grammar.38 In earlier times gj took the dative in this distributive construction, just as gj takes the dative in other senses of distribution over a set of entities (,hjlbnm gj ekbwfv ‘to wander along the streets’). In this construction, however, there is a long-term shift away from the dative. The dative is still obligatory with single units: adjectival jlby ([119]), mille numerals ([120]), even bare singular nouns without a numeral ([121]):
37 Legendre and Akimova 1994. |
38 Comrie 1991, among other sources. |
202A Reference Grammar of Russian
[119]D Vjcrdt ctqxfc 9 nsczx DBX-byabwbhjdfyys[ -- d chtlytv gj jlyjve<dat> xtkjdtre<dat> yf rf;le/ nsczxe yfctktybz.
In Moscow now there are nine thousand HIV-positive people -- on average, one person per thousand of the population.
[120]Ghbvthyj gj vbkkbjye<dat> ljkkfhjd gjkexfn d ysytiytv ujle kfehtfns. Nobel laureates will receive approximately one million dollars per person this year.
[121]E Rjcnb ,skj gj hjvfye<dat> d rf;ljv gjhne. Kostia had a romance in every port.
Pluralia tantum use the dative: gj cenrfv ‘for a day at a time’, gj yj;ybwfv ‘a pair of scissors each’. The dative is still an option with y†crjkmrj: cbltkj gj jlyjq, gj ldt, f nj b gj ytcrjkmre<dat> cnfhe[<gen> ‘there sat one, or two, or several old women on each’.
Many numerals -- integers (gz´nm), teens (nhbyƒlwfnm), and decades (ldƒlwfnm, gznmltcz´n, dj´ctvmltczn) -- take either of two forms. The older form is an oblique case form -- ldflwfn∫ in [122]. This form, let us assume, is genitive, since the quantified noun is genitive and some forms (gj gznbcj´n ‘five hundred per’) look like genitives.39
[122]Cjamz gjnht,jdfkf, xnj, cnhtkmws ghbckfkb gj ldflwfnb<gen> xtkjdtr kexitq ,hfnbb jn rf;ljuj gjkrf.
Sofia demanded that the streltsy should send twenty of their best people from each regiment.
The other option is the direct (nom=acc) case form (gj ldflwfnm<nom=acc> xtkjdtr, in [116]), now much more frequent. In a sampling of websites, the older oblique form was used at most in a quarter of the tokens (with gz´nm and l†cznm), to as little as a tenth (ldƒlwfnm).
Other numerals now use the direct case almost exclusively. Included here are compound hundreds ([123]), round numerals (cnj´ ‘hundred’, cj´hjr ‘forty’), and paucals ([124]):
[123]Yjdbxjr ljk;ty ,sk ghbdtcnb d jhufybpfwb/ vbybvev nht[ xtkjdtr b, cjjndtncndtyyj, gjkexbnm jn rf;ljuj bp yb[ gj nhbcnf<nom=acc> ljkkfhjd. The initiate was supposed to bring into the organization at the minimum three people, and accordingly, to receive from each three hundred dollars.
[124]Gjckt nht[ nsczx gjkextyys[ pdjyrjd abhvf ghbrhsdftn cfqn b gjzdkztncz d lheujv vtcnt. Nhb nsczxb pdjyrjd gj nhb<nom=acc> vbyens, gj nhb<nom=acc> ljkkfhf vbyenf.
39Comrie 1986[a]. Alternatively, the form might be a dative, residually governing the genitive of the quantified noun, parallel to gj ytcrjkmre<dat> cnfhe[<gen> ; gznbcjn would be an idiosyncratic, archaic dative preserved in this construction.