
- •1.1. Problems of stylistic research
- •1.2. Stylistics of language and speech
- •1.4. Stylistics and other linguistic disciplines
- •1.5. Stylistic neutrality and stylistic colouring
- •1.6. Stylistic function notion
- •2.1. Expressive means and stylistic devices Expressive means
- •2.2.1. Hellenistic Roman rhetoric system
- •2.2.2. Stylistic theory and classification of expresssive means by g. Leech
- •2,2.3. I. R. Galperin's classification of expressive means and stylistic devices
- •2.2.4. Classification of expressive means and stylistic devices by y. M. Skrebnev
- •3.1. The theory of grammatical gradation.
- •3.2. Grammatical metaphor and types of grammatical transposition
- •3.3. Morphological stylistics.
- •3.3.1. The noun and its stylistic potential
- •3.3.2. The article and its stylistic potential
- •3.3.3. The stylistic power of the pronoun
- •3.3.4. The adjective and its stylistic functions
- •3.3.5. The verb and its stylistic properties
- •3.4. Stylistic syntax
- •4.1. The notion of style in functional stylistics
- •4.2. Correlation of style, norm and function in the language
- •4.3. Language varieties:
- •4.4. An overview of functional style systems
- •1. The Belles-Lettres Style:
- •1. Literary or Bookish Style:
- •2. Free ("Colloquial") Style:
- •1. Colloquial Styles:
- •2. Literary Bookish Styles:
- •1. Official business style.
- •4.5. Distinctive linguistic features of the major functional styles of English
- •5.2. Essential concepts of decoding stylistic analysis and types of foregrounding
- •5.2.2. Defeated expectancy
- •5.2.3. Coupling
- •5.2.5. Semi-marked structures
1.2. Stylistics of language and speech
One of the fundamental concepts of linguistics is the dichotomy of "language and speech" (langue - parole) introduced by F. de Saussure. According to it language is a system of elementary and complex signs: phonemes, morphemes, words, word combinations, utterances and combinations of utterances. Language as such a system exists in human minds only and linguistic forms or units can be systematised into paradigms.
So language is a mentally organised system of linguistic units. An individual speaker never uses it. When we use these units we mix them in acts of speech. As distinct from language speech is not a purely mental phenomenon, not a system but a process of combining these linguistic elements into linear linguistic units that are called syntagmatic.
The result of this process is the linear or syntagmatic combination of vowels and consonants into words, words into word-combinations and sentences and combination of sentences into texts. The word "syntagmatic" is a purely linguistic term meaning a coherent sequence of words (written, uttered or just remembered).
Stylistics is a branch of linguistics that deals with texts, not with the system of signs or process of speech production as such. But within these texts elements stylistically relevant are studied both syntagmatically and paradigmatically (loosely classifying all stylistic means paradigmatically into tropes and syntagmatically into figures of speech).
Eventually this brings us to the notions of stylistics of language and stylistics of speech. Their difference lies in the material studied.
The stylistics of language analyses permanent or inherent stylistic properties of language elements while the stylistics of speech studies stylistic properties, which appear in a context, and they are called adherent.
Russian words like толмач, штудировать, соизволять or English words prevaricate, comprehend, lass are bookish or archaic and these are their inherent properties. The unexpected use of any of these words in a modern context will be an adherent stylistic property.
So stylistics of language describes and classifies the inherent stylistic colouring of language units. Stylistics of speech studies the composition of the utterance - the arrangement, selection and distribution of different words, and their adherent qualities.
1.3. Types of stylistic research and branches of stylistics
Literary and linguistic stylistics
According to the type of stylistic research we can distinguish literary stylistics and lingua-stylistics. They have some meeting points or links in that they have common objects of research. Consequently they have certain areas of cross-reference. Both study the common ground of:
1) the literary language from the point of view of its variability;
2) the idiolect (individual speech) of a writer;
3) poetic speech that has its own specific laws.
• Functional styles (in their development and current state).
• The linguistic nature of the expressive means of the language, their systematic character and their functions.
Literary stylistics is focused on
• The composition of a work of art.
• Various literary genres.
• The writer's outlook.
Comparative stylistics
Comparative stylistics is connected with the contrastive study of more than one language.
It analyses the stylistic resources not inherent in a separate language but at the crossroads of two languages, or two literatures and is obviously linked to the theory of translation.
Decoding stylistics
A comparatively new branch of stylistics is the decoding stylistics, which can be traced back to the works of L. V. Shcherba, B. A. Larin, M. Riffaterre, R. Jackobson and other scholars of the Prague linguistic circle. A serious contribution into this branch of stylistic study was
also made by Prof. I.V. Arnold (3, 4). Each act of speech has the performer, or sender of speech and the recipient. The former does the act of encoding and the latter the act of decoding the information.
If we analyse the text from the author's (encoding) point of view we should consider the epoch, the historical situation, the personal political, social and aesthetic views of the author.
But if we try to treat the same text from the reader's angle of view we shall have to disregard this background knowledge and get the maximum information from the text itself (its vocabulary, composition, sentence arrangement, etc.). The first approach manifests the prevalence of the literary analysis. The second is based almost exclusively on the linguistic analysis. Decoding stylistics is an attempt to harmoniously combine the two methods of stylistic research and enable the scholar to interpret a work of art with a minimum loss of its purport and message.
Functional stylistics
Special mention should be made of functional stylistics which is a branch of lingua-stylistics that investigates functional styles, that is special sublanguages or varieties of the national language such as scientific, colloquial, business, publicist and so on.
However many types of stylistics may exist or spring into existence they will all consider the same source material for stylistic analysis-sounds, words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs and texts. That's why any kind of stylistic research will be based on the level-forming branches that include:
Stylistic lexicology
Stylistic Lexicology studies the semantic structure of the word and the interrelation (or interplay) of the connotative and denotative meanings of the word, as well as the interrelation of the stylistic connotations of the word and the context.
Stylistic Phonetics (or Phonostylistics) is engaged in the study of style-forming phonetic features of the text. It describes the prosodic features of prose and poetry and variants of pronunciation in different types of speech (colloquial or oratory or recital).
Stylistic grammar
Stylistic Morphology is interested in the stylistic potentials of specific grammatical forms and categories, such as the number of the noun, or the peculiar use of tense forms of the verb, etc.
Stylistic Syntax is one of the oldest branches of stylistic studies that grew out of classical rhetoric. The material in question lends itself readily to analysis and description. Stylistic syntax has to do with the expressive order of words, types of syntactic links (asyndeton, polysyndeton), figures of speech (antithesis, chiasmus, etc.). It also deals with bigger units from paragraph onwards.