Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

GINA2009

.pdf
Скачиваний:
9
Добавлен:
09.02.2016
Размер:
902.98 Кб
Скачать
61. Jatakanon A, Lim S, Barnes PJ. Changes in sputum eosinophils predict loss of asthma controlAm J Respir. Crit Care Med
2000;161:64-72.

31.

Kharitonov S, Alving K, Barnes PJ. Exhaled and nasal nitric

47.

Chan-Yeung M, Desjardins A. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness

 

oxide measurements: recommendations. The European

 

and level of exposure in occupational asthma due to western

 

Respiratory Society Task ForceEur. Respir1997;10(7):1683J -93.

 

 

red cedar (Thuja plicata). Serial observations before and after

32.

Horvath I, Hunt J, Barnes PJ, Alving K, Antczak A, Baraldi E, et

 

development of symptomsAm Rev. Respir Dis

 

1992;146(6):1606-9.

 

 

 

 

al. Exhaled breath condensate: methodological

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

recommendations and unresolved questionsEur Respir.

J

48.

Cote J, Kennedy S, Chan-Yeung M. Sensitivity and specificity

 

2005;26:523-48.

 

 

 

 

 

of PC20 and peak expiratory flow rate in cedar asthma.

33.

Green RH, Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Parker D,

 

J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;85(3):592-8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bradding P, et al.Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil49. Vandenplas O, Malo JL. Inhalation challenges with agents

 

counts: a randomised controlledLancettrial.

 

 

 

causing occupational asthmaEur. Respir1997;10(11):2612J -29.

 

2002;360(9347):1715-21.

 

 

 

 

50. Bright P, Burge PS. Occupational lung disease. 8. The

 

 

 

 

 

 

34.

Smith AD, Cowan JO, Brassett KP, Herbison GP, Taylor DR.

 

 

diagnosis of occupational asthma from serial measurements

 

Use of exhaled nitric oxide measurements to guide treatmentlungin function at and away fromThoraxwork.1996;51(8):857-63.

 

chronic asthmaN Engl. J Med

2005;352(21):2163-73.

 

 

51. Chan-Yeung M, MacLean L, Paggiaro PL. Follow-up study of

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.

Hoeppner VH, Murdock KY, Kooner S, Cockcroft DW. Severe

 

 

232 patients with occupational asthma caused by western red

 

acute "occupational asthma" caused by accidental allergen

 

cedar (Thuja plicata)J Allergy.

Clin Immunol 1987;79(5):792-6.

 

exposure in an allergen challenge laboratoryAnn Allergy.

 

 

 

 

 

REPRODUCE!

 

 

52. Nicholson PJ, Cullinan P, Taylor AJ, Burge PS, Boyle C.

 

1985;55:36-7.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identifica

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36.

Wilson NM. Wheezy bronchitis revisitedArch Dis.Child

 

 

 

 

OR

 

 

 

 

and management of occupational asthmaOccup. Environ Med

 

1989;64(8):1194-9.

 

 

 

 

 

2005;62(5):290-9.

 

 

 

37.

Martinez FD. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and53.thePrice DB, Tinkelman DG, Halbert RJ, Nordyke RJ, Isonaka S,

 

pathogenesis of childhood asthmaPediatr. Infect Dis J2003;22

 

 

Nonikov D, et al.Symptom-based questionnaire for identifyin

 

(2 Suppl):S76-82.

 

 

 

 

 

COPD in smokers. Respiration2006;73(3):285-95.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ALTER

 

 

 

38.

Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD.

 

54.

Tinkelman DG, Price DB, Nordyke RJ, Halbert RJ, Isonaka S,

 

A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young childrenNonikovwith D, et al.Symptom-based questionnaire for

 

recurrent wheezingAm J Respir.

Crit Care Med 2000;162

 

 

differentiating COPD and asthmaRespiration. 2006;73(3):296-305.

 

(4 Pt 1):1403-6.

 

 

 

DO

NOT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55. Szefler SJ, Mitchell H, Sorkness CA, Gergen PJ, O'Connor GT,

 

 

 

 

 

39.

Sears MR, Greene JM, Willan AR, Wiecek EM, Taylor DR,

 

Morgan WJ, et al. Management of asthma based on exhaled nitric

 

 

 

 

 

 

oxide in addition to guideline-based treatment for inner-cit

 

Flannery EM, et al.A longitudinal, population-based,-cohort

 

 

study of childhood asthma followed to adulthoodN Engl J Med.

 

adolescents and young adults: a randomised controlled trial.

 

2003;349(15):1414-22.

 

 

 

 

 

Lancet . 2008 Sep 20;372(9643):1065-72.

 

 

40.

Guilbert TW, Morgan WJ, Zeiger RS, Mauger DT, Boehmer SJ,

 

56.

Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Green RH, Brightling CE,

 

Szefler SJ,et al.Long-term inhaled corticosteroids in preschool

Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. The use of exhaled nitric oxide to guide

 

children at high risk forN EnglasthmaJ Med.

 

 

 

asthma management: a randomized controlled trialAm J Respir.

 

2006;354(19):1985-97.

 

 

 

 

 

Crit Care Med 2007;176:231-7.

 

 

41.

Frey U, Stocks J, Sly P, Bates J. Specification for signal

57.

Bel EH. Clinical phenotypes of asthmaCurr. Opin Pulm Med

 

 

 

MATERIAL

 

 

2004;10:44-50.

 

 

 

 

processing and data handling used for infant pulmonary

 

 

 

 

function testing. RS/ATS Task Force on Standards for Infant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respiratory Function

 

 

 

 

58. Wenzel SE. Asthma: defining of the persistent adult phenotype

 

esting. European Respiratory Society/

Lancet 2006;368:804-13.

 

 

 

 

American Thoracic SocietyEur. Respir2000;16(5):1016J

-22.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42.

Sly PD, Cahill P, Willet K, Burton P. Accuracy of mini peak flow 59. Berry M, Morgan A, Shaw DE, Parker D, Green R, Brightling C,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Pathological features and

 

meters in indicating changes in lung function in children with

 

 

 

 

asthma.BMJ 1994;308(6928):572-4.

 

 

 

 

 

inhaled corticosteroid response of eosinophilic and non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

eosinophilic astThmaorax. 2007;62:1043-9.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43.

Mok Q, iesowicz AT. Foreign body aspiration mimicking

60. Pavord ID, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, Wardlaw AJ. Non-

 

asthma.Intensive Care Med

1993;19(4):240-1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

eosinophilic corticosteroid unresponsiveLancetasthma.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44.

Place R, Morrison A, Arce . Vocal cord dysfunctionJ .Adolesc

 

1999;353:2213-4.

 

 

 

 

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health 2000;27(2):125-9.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45. Tarlo SM, Liss GM. Occupational asthma: an approach to diagnosis and managementCMAJ. 2003;168(7):867-71.

46.Tarlo SM. Laboratory challenge testing for occupational asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111(4):692-4.

DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION

25

62.

Simpson JL, Scott R, Boyle MJ, Gibson PG. Inflammatory

 

76.

van Rensen EL, Sont JK, Evertse CE, Willems LN, Mauad T,

 

subtypes in asthma: assessment and identification usingHiemstra PS, Sterk PJ. Bronchial CD8 cell infiltrate and lung

 

induced sputumRespirology. 2006;11:54-61.

 

 

 

function decline inAmasthmaJ Respir. Crit Care Med

63.

van Veen IH, Ten Brinke A, Gauw SA, Sterk PJ, Rabe KF, Bel EH.

 

2005;172:837-41.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consistency of sputum eosinophilia in difficult-to-treat77. asthma:HaldarP,a 5Pavord-

ID, Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Brightling

 

year follow-up studyJ Allergy.

Clin Immunol2009;124:615-7, 617

 

 

CE, Wardlaw AJ, Green RH. Cluster analysis and clinical asthma

 

e1-2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

phenotypesAm. J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:218-24.

64.

Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, Busse WW, Clark TJ,

 

78.

Jayaram L, Pizzichini MM, Cook RJ, Boulet LP, Lemiere ,

 

Pauwels RA, Pedersen SE. Can guideline-defined asthma control

Pizzichini E, Cartier A, Hussack P, Goldsmith H, Laviolette M,

 

be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL studyAm J .

 

Parameswaran K, Hargreave FE. Determining asthma treatment

 

Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:836-44.

 

 

 

 

 

by monitoring sputum cell counts: effect onEurexacerbations.

65.

Bateman ED, Bousquet J, Keech ML, Busse WW, Clark TJ,

 

 

Respir J2006;27:483-94.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pedersen SE. The correlation between asthma control and health79. Taylor DR, Bateman ED, Boulet LP, Boushey HA, Busse WW,

 

status: the GOAL studyEur. Respir2007;29:56J -62.

 

 

Casale TB, Chanez P, Enright PL, Gibson PG, de Jongste JC,

66.

Osborne ML, Pedula KL, O'Hollaren M, Ettinger KM, Stibolt T, Buist

 

Kerstjens HA, Lazarus SC, Levy ML, O'Byrne PM, Partridge MR,

 

Pavord ID, Sears MR, Sterk PJ, Stoloff SW, Szefler SJ, Sullivan

 

AS, Vollmer WM. Assessing future need for acute care in adult

SD, Thomas MD, Wenzel SE, eddelREPRODUCE!HK. A new perspective on

 

asthmatics: the Profile of Asthma Risk Study: a prospective health

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

concepts of asthma severity and controlEur Respir. J

 

maintenance organization-based studyChest 2007;132:1151.-61.

 

 

2008;32:545-54.

 

OR

67.

Thomas M, Kay S, Pike J, Williams A, Rosenzweig JR, Hillyer EV,

 

 

 

80.

Cockcroft DW, Swystun VA. Asthma control versus asthma

 

Price D. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as a predictor of GINA

 

severityJ Allergy.

Clin Immunol1996;98:1016-8.

 

guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a multinational cross-

 

 

 

sectional surveyPrim. Care Respir J2009;18:41-9.

 

81.

Chen H, Gould MK, Blanc PD, Miller DP, Kamath TV, Lee JH,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sullivan SD. Asthma control, severity, and quality of life: qua

68.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma

 

theALTEReffect of uncontrolledJ AllergydiseaseClin. Immunol

 

Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3:

 

2007;120:396-402.

 

 

 

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. August

 

 

 

2007. Available from:

 

 

 

 

 

82. Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma: current

 

www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln

 

NOTunderstanding, recommendations, and unanswered questions.

69.

Khalili B, Boggs PB, Shi R, Bahna SL. Discrepancy between

 

American Thoracic Societym. JA Respir Crit Care Med

 

2000;162:2341-51.

 

 

 

clinical asthma control assessment tools and fractionalDOexhaled

 

 

 

nitric oxideAnn Allergy.

Asthma Immunol

2008;101:124-9.

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70.

Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development

 

 

 

 

 

and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life QuestionnaireEur .

 

 

 

Respir J1999;14:32-8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71.

Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P,

 

 

 

 

 

Murray JJ, Pendergraft TB. Development of the asthma control

 

 

 

 

 

test: a survey for assessing asthmaJ AllergycontrolC .in Immunol

 

 

 

 

 

2004;113:59-65.

 

 

MATERIAL

 

 

 

 

72.

Liu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S,

 

 

 

 

 

Rosenzweig JC, Manjunath . Development and cross-sectional

 

 

 

 

 

validation of the Childhood Asthma ControlJ AllergyTest. Clin

 

 

 

 

 

Immunol 2007;119:817-25.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73.

Vollmer WM, Markson LE, O'Connor E, Sanocki LL, Fitterman L,

 

 

 

 

 

Berger M, Buist AS. Association of asthma control with health care

 

 

 

 

utilization and qualityAm J ofResplifer Crit. Care Med

 

 

 

 

 

 

1999;160:1647-52.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74.

Boulet LP, Boulet V, Milot J. How should we quantify asthma

 

 

 

 

 

control? A proposal. Chest 2002;122:2217-23.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75.

Schatz M, Mosen DM, Kosinski M, Vollmer WM, Magid DJ,

 

 

 

 

 

 

O'Connor E, Zeiger RS. Validity of the Asthma Control Test

 

 

 

 

 

completed at homeAm. J Manag Care

 

2007;13:661-7.

 

 

 

 

 

26 DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION

 

DO

 

-

COPYRIGHTED

MATERIAL

 

 

 

 

REPRODUCE!

 

CHAPTER

 

 

OR

3

 

ALTER

 

NOT

 

 

ASTHMA

TREATMENTS

KEY POINTS:

ASTHMA MEDICATIONS: ADULTS

• Medications to treat asthma can be classified as

 

 

 

 

 

Route of Administration

controllers or relievers. Controllers are medications

 

 

taken daily on a long-term basis to keep asthma

Asthma treatment for adults can be administered in

 

 

 

under clinical control chiefly through their anti-

 

 

 

 

 

or “wet” aerosols* . InhalerREPRODUCE!devices differ in their e

 

 

 

different ways—inhaled, orally or parenterally (by

inflammatory effects. Relievers are medications

 

 

used on an as-needed basis that act quickly to

subcutaneous, intramuscular, or intravenous injecti

 

 

 

The major advantage of inhaled therapy is that drugs are

reverse bronchoconstriction and relieve its symptoms.

 

 

 

 

delivered directly into the airways, producing highe

 

 

 

concentrations with significantly less risk of s

• Asthma treatment can be administered in different

 

 

ways—inhaled, orally, or by injection. The major side effects.

 

advantage of inhaled therapy is that drugs are

Inhaled medications for asthma are available as pressuri

 

 

 

delivered directly into the airways, producing higher

 

local concentrations with significantly lessmeteredrisk of-dose inhalers (MDIs), breath-actuated MDIs, dry

systemic side effects.

 

 

powder inhalers (DPIs), soft mist inhalers, and nebuli

 

 

 

 

 

OR

• Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are the most effectiveof drug delivery to the lower respiratory tract, depend

controller medications currently available.

on the form of the device, formulation of medication,

 

 

 

 

ALTER

 

• Rapid-acting inhaled-agonists are the

 

 

particle size, velocity of the aerosol cloud or plume (wh

 

 

applicable), and ease with which the device can be used

2

 

 

 

 

 

medications of choice for relief of

 

 

by the majority of patients. Individual patient pref

bronchoconstriction and for the pretreatment of

 

 

 

 

 

convenience, and ease of use may influence not only th

exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, in both adults

 

and children of all ages.

 

 

efficiency of drug delivery but also patient adheren

 

 

treatment and long-term control.

• Increased use, especially daily use, of reliever

 

 

 

DO

Pressurized MDIs (pMDIs) require training and skill to

medication is a warning of deterioration of asthmaNOT

 

 

control and indicates the need to reassess

coordinate activation of the inhaler and inhalation.

Medications in these devices can be dispensed as a

treatment.

-

 

 

suspension in chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or as a solutio

 

 

medications taken daily on MATERIALa long-term basis to keep

 

 

2

 

 

 

in hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs). For a pMDI containing

 

 

 

CFCs, the use of a spacer (holding chamber) improves

INTRODUCTION

 

 

drug delivery, increases lung deposition, and may redu

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

local and systemic side effects. However, CFC inhaler

 

 

 

devices are being phased out due to the impact of CFCs

The goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain

 

 

clinical control. Medications to treat asthma can be

upon the atmospheric ozone layer, and are being replaced

by HFA devices. For pMDIs containing bronchodilators,

classified as controllers or relieversControllers.are

the switch from CFC to HFA inhalers does not result in

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

change in efficacy at the same nominal. However,dose

asthma under clinical control chiefly through their anti-

 

 

 

 

for some glucocorticosteroids, the HFA formulations

inflammatory effects. They include inhaled and systemic

 

 

 

 

provide an aerosol of smaller particle size that result

glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers, long-acting

 

inhaled2 -agonists in combination with inhaled

less oral deposition (with associated reduction in oral

effects), and correspondingly greater lung depositio

glucocorticosteroids, sustained-release theophylline,

 

 

 

 

 

This may result in greater systemic efficacy at eq

cromones, and anti-IgE. Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are

 

 

 

 

 

ex-actuator doses, but also greater systemic exposure

the most effective controller medications currently

 

3-5

available.Relieversare medications used on an as-

and risk of side effects. Clinicians are advised to consult

the package inserts of each product to confirm the

needed basis that act quickly to reverse

 

 

 

 

recommended dose equivalent to currently used drugs

bronchoconstriction and relieve its symptoms. They

 

 

 

 

 

Some of these comparisons are providedFigurein 3-1 .

include rapid-acting inh-aledgonists, inhaled 2

anticholinergics, short-acting theophylline, and short-acting oral 2 -agonists.

28 ASTHMA TREATMENTS

*Information on various inhaler devices available can be found on the GINA Website (http://www.ginasthma.org).

Pressurized MDIs may be used by patients with asthmaasthma, and when they are discontinued deterioration o of any severity, including during exacerbations. Breathclinicalcontrol follows within weeks to months in a actuated aerosols may be helpful for patients who haveproportion of patients14,15 .

difficulty using the “press and breathe” pressurized6 . InhaledMDIglucocorticosteroids differ in potency and Soft mist inhalers appear to require less coordinationbioavailability,. but because of relatively flat dose-r Dry powder inhalers are generally easier to use, but theyrelationships in asthma relatively few studies hav

require a minimal inspiratory flow rate and may proveable to confirm the clinical relevance of these191 . diffe

difficult for some patients. DPIs differ with respectFigure 3-1toliststhe approximately equipotent doses of dif fraction of ex-actuator dose delivered to the lung. Forinhaled glucocorticosteroids based upon the available

REPRODUCE!

some drugs, the dose may need to be adjusted when

efficacy literature, but the categorization into dosa

switching from an MDI to 7a.DPINebulized aerosols are

categories does not imply that clear dose-response

8

 

inrelationadultships have been demonstrated for each drug.

rarely indicated for the treatment of chronic asthma.

 

 

The efficacy of some products varies when administe

 

 

16

CONTROLLER MEDICATIONS

via different inhaler. devicesMostof the benefit from

inhaled glucocorticosteroids is achieved in adults at

 

 

Inhaled glucocorticosteroids*

relatively low doses, equivalent to 400 ug of budesonid

per day17 . Increasing to higher doses provides little

 

 

 

 

benefit in terms of asthma control but increases th

Role in therapy- Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are currently

17,18

OR

 

 

 

 

 

 

side effects. However, there is marked individual

the most effective anti-inflammatory medications for the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

variability of responsiveness to inhaled glucocortico

treatment of persistent asthma. Studies have demonstrated

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

and because of this and the recognized poor adherence to

 

 

 

treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids, many pat

their efficacy in reducing asthma, improvingsymptoms

 

9

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

quality of, lifeimproving lung function, decreasing airway

 

will require higher doses to achieve full therapeuti

10

 

11

NOT

ALTER

 

 

 

hyperresponsiveness, controlling airway inflammation, As tobacco smoking reduces the responsiveness to

 

 

12

 

inhaled glucocorticosteroids, higher doses may be

reducing frequency and severity of exacerbations, and

13

 

 

 

required in patients who smoke.

reducing asthma mortality. However, they do not cure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3-1. Estimated Equipotent Daily Doses of Inhaled Glucocorticosteroids for Adults

 

Drug

 

Low Daily Dose ( g)DO

Medium Daily Dose ( g)

High Daily Dose ( g)

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beclomethasone dipropionate

200 - 500

 

>500 - 1000

 

>1000 - 2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Budesonide*

 

200 - 400

 

>400 - 800

 

>800 - 1600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ciclesonide*

 

80 - 160

 

>160 - 320

 

>320 - 1280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flunisolide

 

500 - 1000

 

>1000 - 2000

 

>2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fluticasone propionate

 

100 - 250

 

>250 - 500

 

>500 - 1000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mometasone furoate*

 

200 - 400

 

>400 - 800

 

>800 - 1200

 

 

MATERIAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

Triamcinolone acetonide

 

400 - 1000

 

>1000 - 2000

 

>2000

 

† Comparisons based upon efficacy data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

‡ Patients considered for high daily doses except for short periods should be referred to a specialist for assessment to consider altern

controllers. Maximum recommended doses are arbitrary but with prolonged use are associated with increased risk of systemic side effect

* Approved for once-daily dosing in mild patients.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• The most important determinant of appropriate dosing is the clinicianis judgment of the patientis response to therapy. The clinician m

response in terms of clinical control and adjust the dose accordingly. Once control of asthma is achieved, the dose of medication should b

theminimum dose required to maintain control, thus reducing the potential for adverse effects.

 

 

• Designation of low, medium, and high doses is provided from manufacturersi recommendations where possible. Clear demonstration of dose-r

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

relationships is seldom provided or available. The principle is therefore to establish the minimum effective controlling dose in each

may not be more effective and are likely to be associated with greater potential for adverse effects.

• As CFC preparations are taken from the market, medication inserts for HFA preparations should be carefully reviewed by the clinician for t correct dosage.

*In this section recommendations for doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids are given as “ /day budesonide or equivalent,” because a majority of the clinical literature on these medications uses this standard.

ASTHMA TREATMENTS

29

To reach clinical control, add-on therapy with another prospective studies30-32 . One difficulty in establishing class of controller is preferred over increasing theclinicaldose significance of such adverse effects lie

of inhaled glucocorticosteroids. There is, however, a

dissociating the effect of high-dose inhaled

211

 

 

clear relationship between the dose of inhaled glucoglucocorticosteroids-

from the effect of courses of

corticosteroids and the prevention of severe acute glucocorticosteroids taken by patients with severe a

exacerbations of asthma, although there appear to be

There is no evidence that use of inhaled

12

 

REPRODUCE!

Mouth washing (rinsing with water, gargling, and spitting

differences in response according to symptom/

glucocorticosteroids increases the risk of pulmonary

inflammation phenotype. Therefore, some patients withinfections, including tuberculosis, and inhaled gl

 

212

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

severe asthma may benefit from long-term treatmentcorticosteroidswith

are not contraindicated in patients w

higher doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids.

active tuberculosis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

Side effects:Local adverse effects from inhaled

Leukotriene modifiers.

 

glucocorticosteroids include oropharyngeal candidiasis,

 

 

 

 

dysphonia, and occasionally coughing from upper airway

 

 

 

 

modifiers include cystei

 

 

 

Role in therapy Leukotriene-

irritation. For pressurized MDIs the prevalence of these

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

leukotriene 1 (CysLT1) receptor antagonists (montelukas

effects may be reduced by using certain spacer. devices

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

pranlukast, and zafirlukast) and a 5-lipoxygenase inhib

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OR

 

 

 

 

(zileuton). Clinical studies have demonstrated that

out) after inhalation may reduce oral candidiasis. The use

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

leukotriene modifiers have a small and variable broncho

of prodrugs that are activated in the lungs but not in the

 

 

34

 

 

 

dilator effect, reduce symptoms including, improvecough

pharynx (e.g., ciclesonide), and new formulations and

 

 

ALTER

 

 

lung function, and reduce airway inflammation and ast

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

devices that reduce oropharyngeal deposition, may

exacerbations. They may be used as an alternative

 

 

 

 

 

 

35-37

 

 

minimize such effects without the need for a spacer or

 

 

 

38-40

mouth washing.

 

 

treatment for adult patients with mild persistent,

 

 

and some patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma res

 

 

 

well to leukotriene modifiers. However, when used alone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are absorbed from the lung,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as controller, the effect of leukotriene modifiers a

accounting for some degree of systemic bioavailability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

generally less than that of low doses of inhaled

The risk of systemic adverse effects from an inhaled

 

 

 

 

 

 

DO

glucocorticosteroids, and, in patients already on inhal

glucocorticosteroid depends upon its dose and potency,NOT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers cannot

the delivery system, systemic bioavailability, first-pass

 

 

 

 

 

substitute for this treatment without risking t

metabolism (conversion to inactive metabolites) in the

 

42,43

 

 

 

 

 

asthma control . Leukotriene modifiers used as add-on

liver, and half-life of the fraction of systemically-

absorbed

 

49-51,192

doses of 400 g or less budesonideMATERIALor equivalent daily.

 

 

 

 

 

20

the

therapy may reduce the dose of inhaled glucocorticostero

drug (from the lung and possibly. Therefore,gut)

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

required by patients with moderate to severe, andasthma

systemic effects differ among the various inhaled

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

may improve asthma control in patients whose asthma is

glucocorticosteroids. Several comparative studies have

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

not controlled with low or high doses of inhaled

demonstrated that ciclesonide, budesonide, and fluticasone

 

43,45-47

 

 

 

20-

glucocorticosteroids. With the exception of one

propionate at equipotent doses have less systemic effect

 

 

 

 

 

 

study that demonstrated equivalence in preventing

23 . Current evidence suggests that in adults, systemic

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

exacerbations, several studies have demonstrated that

effects of inhaled glucocorticosteroids are not a problem at

 

 

 

 

 

 

leukotriene modifiers are less effective than long

riskCOPYRIGHTEDwas considerably less than other common risk factors

 

 

 

 

 

 

inhaled2

-agonists as add-on therapy . A controlled

 

 

 

release formulation of zileuton allows this medicati

The systemic side effects of long-term treatment with high

 

 

 

 

 

used on a twice daily basis with effects equivalen

doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids include easy

 

 

 

 

203

24

1,20

 

of standard zileuton used four times. a day

bruising, adrenal suppression, and decreased bone

 

 

 

 

 

 

mineral density. A meta-analysis of case-control

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Side effects -Leukotriene modifiers are well tolerated,

studies of non-vertebral fractures in adults using inhaled

 

 

 

 

 

and few if any class-related effects have so far been

glucocorticosteroids (BDP or equivalent) indicated that in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

recognized. Zileuton has been associated with liver

older adults, the relative risk of non-vertebral fractures

 

 

 

 

 

 

toxicity, and monitoring of liver tests is recommended

increases by about 12% for each 1000 µg/day increase in

 

204

 

 

 

during treatment with this medication. No associati

 

 

 

the dose BDP or equivalent but that the magnitude of this

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

found between Churg-Strauss syndrome and leukotrien

 

213

 

modifiers after controlling for asthma drug use, alt

for fracture in the older. Inhaledadult

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glucocorticosteroids have also been associated with is not possible to rule out modest associations given

27

28,29

 

Churg-Strauss syndrome is so rare and so highly

cataractsand glaucoma in cross-sectional studies, but

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

 

correlated with asthma severity.

there is no evidence of posterior-subcapsular cataracts in

 

 

 

30 ASTHMA TREATMENTS

Long-acting inhaled

 

-agonists.

Side effects- Therapy with long-acting inhaled-agonists

 

2

 

2

 

 

 

causes fewer systemic adverse effects—such as

Role in therapy- Long-acting inhaled-agonists,

cardiovascular stimulation, skeletal muscle tremor, a

 

 

2

 

including formoterol and salmeterol, should not be usedhypokalemia—than oral therapy. The regular use of rapidas monotherapy in asthma as these medications do not acting2 -agonists in both short and long acting forms

appear to influence the airway inflammation in asthmalead. to relative refractoriness-agoniststo 74 . Data 2

They are most effective when combined with inhaledindicating a possible increased risk of asthma-relate

55,56,193

 

 

glucocorticosteroids, and this combination therapy isdeath associated with the use of salmeterol in a small

 

75

 

the preferred treatment when a medium dose of inhaledgroup of individualsled to advisories from the US Food

 

§

glucocorticosteroid alone fails to achieve control ofand Drug Administration (FDA)and Health Canada that

asthma. Addition of long-acting inhaled-agonists to a

long-acting-agonists are not a substitute for inhaled

2

2

 

daily regimen of inhaled glucocorticosteroids improvesoralglucocorticosteroids, and should only be used in symptom scores, decreases nocturnal asthma, improvescombination with an appropriate dose of inhaled

 

 

215

lung function, decreases the use of rapid-acting inhaledglucocorticosteroid as determined by a physician. A

57-59

12,57-62

meta-analysis of all studies of salmeterol added to in

2 -agonists, reduces the number of exacerbations,

does not increase the risk of asthma-related

glucocorticosteroids has concluded that this combina

214

 

 

 

hospitalizations, and achieves clinical control of asthmadoes not increase the riskREPRODUCE!for asthma-related deaths or

in more patients, more rapidly, and at a lower dose of

intubations when compared to inhaled glucocorticoster

inhaled glucocorticosteroids than inhaled

alone205 . No influence of-adrenergic receptor

63

 

 

OR2

glucocorticosteroids given. alone

phenotypes upon the efficacy or safety of long-acting

 

2 -agonist therapy has been observed when administere

This greater efficacy of combination treatment hasinledcombinationto

with inhaled glucocorticosteroids whe

2

ALTER

 

the development of fixed combination inhalers thatbydeliverthe single inhaler for maintenance and relief met

both glucocorticosteroid and long-acti-agongist

 

at a regular fixed dose in206adults.

64, 65

 

NOT

simultaneously (fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol,

budesonide plus formoterol). Controlled studies haveTheophylline.

shown that delivering this therapy in a combination inhaler

 

DO2

Role in therapy- Theophylline is a bronchodilator and,

is as effective as giving each drug separately.Fixed

combination inhalers are more convenient for patients,whenmaygiven in a lower dose, has modest anti-inflammato

 

-

properties. It is available in sustained-release

increase compliance, and ensure that the long acting-

66

MATERIAL

77-79

agonist is always accompanied by a glucocorticosteroidformulations. that are suitable for onceor twice-daily In addition, combination inhalers containing formoteroldosingand. Data on the relative efficacy of theophylline budesonide may be used for both rescue and maintenancelong.-term controller is lacking. However, available Both components of budesonide-formoterol given as evidence suggests that sustained-release theophyll needed contribute to enhanced protection from severelittle effect as a first80-line.It maycontprollervide benefit exacerbations in patients receiving combination therasapydd-forontherapy in patients who do not achieve control

maintenance and provide improvements in asthma

on inhaled glucocorticosteroids .aloneAdditionally in

67,194

 

81-83

control at relatively low doses of treatm. (Seent

such patients the withdrawal of sustained-release

COPYRIGHTED

67-70

 

 

theophylline has been associated with deterioration of

Appendix B, GINA Pocket Guide updated 2009 for

information on Asthma Combination Medications For

control. As add-on therapy, theophylline is less effec

Adults and Children 5 Years and Older.)

84

than long-acting inhaled-agonists.

 

 

85,86

 

 

2

Long-acting 2 -agonists when used as a combination

Side effects- Side effects of theophylline, particularl

medication with inhaled glucocorticosteroids, may alsohigherbe doses (10 mg/kg body weight/day or more), are

used to prevent exercise-induced bronchospasm, and forsignificant and reduce their usefulness. Side ef this purpose may provide longer protection than rapidbereduced by careful dose selection and monitoring, an

acting inhaled-agonists. Salmeterol and formoterol

generally decrease or disappear with continued use.

71

 

2

 

provide a similar duration of bronchodilation and protectionAdverse effects include gastrointestinal symptom against bronchoconstrictors, but there are pharmacologicalstools, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, and even death. differences between them. Formoterol has a more rapidNausea and vomiting are the most common early events.

onset of action than salmeterol, which may make

Monitoring is advised when a high dose is started, if

72, 73

 

formoterol suitable for symptom relief as well as symptompatient develops an adverse effect on the usual dose,

prevention.

when expected therapeutic aims are not achieved, and

68

 

‡ http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/advisories-avis/prof/2003/serevent_hpc-cps_e.html § www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/advisories-avis/prof/2003/serevent_hpc-cps_e.html

ASTHMA TREATMENTS

31

when conditions known to alter theophylline metabolismmedications, and fewer exacerbations90,91 . Further

exist. For example, febrile illness, pregnancy, and investigations will likely provide additional clari

anti-tuberculosis medicationsreduce blood levels of

the role of anti-IgE in other clinical settings.

87

 

theophylline, while liver disease, congestive heart failure,

and certain drugs including cimetidine, some quinolones,Side effects:As indicated by several studies involvin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

207

and some macrolides increase the risk of toxicity. asthmaLower patients ages 12 years and older, who were

doses of theophylline, which have been demonstratedalreadyto

receiving treatment with glucocorticosteroid

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

 

89

provide the full anti-inflammatory benefit, areof this(inhaleddrug and/or oral) and long-acting-agonists, anti-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92-94

associated with less frequent side effects, andIgEplasmaappears to be safe as add-on therapy.

theophylline levels in patients on low-dose therapy need

 

 

 

not be measured unless overdose is suspected.

 

Systemic glucocorticosteroids.

Cromones: sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil

 

Role in therapy- Long-term oral glucocorticosteroid

sodium.

 

 

 

therapy (that is, for periods longer than two weeks as a

Role in therapy– The role of sodium cromoglycate and

 

glucocorticosteroid “burst”) may be required for sever

 

uncontrolled asthma, but its use is limited by the r

nedocromil sodium in long-term treatment of asthma in

 

 

REPRODUCE!

 

 

 

 

 

significant adverse effects. The therapeutic inde

adults is limited. Efficacy has been reported in patients

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(effect/side effect) of long-term inhaled glucocort

with mild persistent asthma and exercise-induced

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

steroids is always more favorable than long-term syst

bronchospasm. Their anti-inflammatory effect is weak

 

OR

95,96

 

 

 

 

 

glucocorticosteroids in asthma.If oral glucocortico-

and they are less effective than a low dose of inhaled

 

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

steroids have to be administered on a long-term basis,

 

 

 

 

attention must be paid to measures that minimize th

glucocorticosteroid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

systemic side effects. Oral preparations are preferr

Side effects- Side effects are uncommon and include

 

parenteralALTER(intramuscular or intravenous) for long-ter

coughing upon inhalation and sore throat. Some patients

 

 

 

find the taste of nedocromil sodium unpleasant.

 

therapy because of their lower mineralocorticoid effe

 

relatively short half-life, and lesser effects on s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

muscle, as well as the greater flexibility of dosing t

Long-acting oral 2 -agonists.

 

 

NOT

 

 

 

 

 

 

titration to the lowest acceptable dose that maintains c

Role in therapy- Long acting oral -agonists include

 

Side effects- The systemic side effects of long-term o

 

 

2

DO

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

slow release formulations of salbutamol, terbutaline, and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or parenteral glucocorticosteroid treatment include

bambuterol, a prodrug that is converted to terbutaline in

 

 

 

the body. They are used only on rare occasions when

 

osteoporosis, arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypothalam

 

pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, obesity, cataracts

additional bronchodilation is needed.

 

 

glaucoma, skin thinning leading to cutaneous striae a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

easy bruising, and muscle weakness. Patients with as

Side effects- The side effect profile of long acting oral

 

 

 

-agonists is higher than that of-inhaledagonists, and

 

who are on long-term systemic glucocorticosteroids in

 

form should receive preventive treatment for osteopor

2

 

 

2

 

includes cardiovascular stimulation (tachycardia), anxiety,

. Although it is rare, withdrawal of oral

 

 

MATERIAL

 

(Figure 3-2 )97-99

and skeletal muscle tremor. Adverse cardiovascular

 

glucocorticosteroids can elicit adrenal failure or unm

reactions may also occur with the combination of oral

 

 

 

54,100

 

 

 

 

 

underlying disease, such as Churg-Strauss Syndrome.

-agonists and theophylline. Regular use of long-acting

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Caution and close medical supervision are recommended

oral 2 -agonists as monotherapy is likely to be harmful

 

 

 

and these medications must always be given in

 

when considering the use of systemic glucocorticos

 

in patients with asthma who also have tuberculosis,

combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids.

 

 

parasitic infections, osteoporosis, glaucoma, diabetes

 

 

 

 

 

Anti-IgE.

 

 

 

severe depression, or peptic ulcers. Fatal herpes viru

 

 

 

infections have been reported among patients who are

 

 

 

 

 

Role in therapy- Anti-IgE (omalizumab) is a treatment

 

exposed to these viruses while taking systemic

 

glucocorticosteroids, even short bursts.

 

 

 

 

 

option limited to patients with elevated serum levels of IgE.

 

 

 

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Its current indication is for patients with severe allergic

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

Oral anti-allergic compounds.

asthma who are uncontrolled on inhaled glucocortico-

 

 

 

 

 

steroids, although the dose of concurrent treatment has

Role in therapy- Several oral anti-allergic compounds varied in different studies. Improved asthma control is

have been introduced in some countries for the treatm reflected by fewer symptoms, less need for reliever

32 ASTHMA TREATMENTS

Figure 3-2. Glucocorticosteroids and Osteoporosis

Asthma patients on high-dose inhaled glucocorticosteroids or oral glucocorticosteroids at any dose are considered at risk of d osteoporosis and fractures, but it is not certain whether this risk exists for patients on lower doses1 . Physof inhcialedns glucoc should consider monitoring patients who are at risk. The following summarizes monitoring and management but more detaile the management of steroid-induced osteoporosis are2,3 available.

Screening

REPRODUCE!

 

bodies

 

of

 

• Any patient with asthma who has been taking oral glucocorticosteroids for over 6 months duration at a mean daily dose of 7.5 mg

prednisone/prednisolone or above.

 

• Post-menopausal women taking over 5 mg prednisone/prednisolone daily for more than 3 months.

• Any patient with asthma and a history of vertebral or other fractures that may be related to osteoporosis.

Bone

 

Osteoporosis

 

• T-score below -2.5 (2.5 standard deviations below the mean value of young normal subjects of the same sex in patients 19-69 years

• Z-score below -1 (1 standard deviation below the predicted value for age and sex).

OR

Follow-up scanning - Repeat scanning should be done:

In 2 years in those whose initial scan was not osteoporotic but in whom treatment (as above) with oral glucocorticosteroids

In 1 year for those with osteoporosis on the first scan who are started on osteoporosis treatment.

Management

General measures include avoidance of smoking, regular exercise, use of the lowest dose of oral glucocorticosteroid possi dietary intake of calcium.

For women with osteoporosis up to 10 years post-menopausal offer bisphosphonates or hormone4,5,6 (Evidencetherapy A ).

For men, pre-menopausal women, and women more than 10 years since menopause consider treatment with a bisphosphonate7 (Evidence A ).NOT

References

1.Goldstein MF, Fallon JJ, Jr., Harning R. Chronic glucocorticoid therapy-induced osteoporosis in patients with obstructiveChest 1999; 116:1733lung-1749. disease.

2.Eastell R, Reid DM, Compston J, Cooper C, Fogelman I, Francis RM -et al. A UK Consensus Group on management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis:DO

3.

 

MATERIAL

 

 

.

Sambrook PN, Diamond T, Ferris L, Fiatarone-Singh M, Flicker , MacLennan A et al. Corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. Guidelines forAusttreatmentFam

 

Physician 2001; 30:793-796.

 

 

 

 

4.

Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy

 

 

postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomizedJAMA controlled.2002;288:321-33.trial.

 

 

 

5.

Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, Cummings SR, Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, LeBoff M, Lewis CE, McGowan J, Neuner J, Pettinger M, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-

 

 

Wende J, Watts NB. "Effects of Estrogen Plus Progestin on Risk of Fracture and Bone MineralJAMA Density2003;290(13):1729."-1738.

 

 

 

6.

Brown JP, Josse RG. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosisCMAJ in. Canada2002;167:S1.-34.

 

 

 

7.

Homik J, Cranney A, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells G, Adachi et al. Bisphosphonates for steroid induced osteoporosisCochrane Database. Syst Rev

2000;CD001347.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

of mild to moderate allergic asthma. These include with severe asthma have been proposed. These

 

tranilast, repirinast, tazanolast, pemirolast, ozagrel,medications should be used only in selected patients celatrodast, amlexanox, and ibudilast. In general, theirunder the supervision of an asthma specialist, as th anti-asthma effect appears to be101limited,but studies on potential steroid-sparing effects may not outweigh the relative efficacy of these compounds are neededof serious side effects. Two meta-analyses of the s before recommendations can be made about their role insparing effect of low-dose methotrexate showed a smal

the long-term treatment of asthma.

overall benefit, but a relatively high frequency of a

 

effects. This small potential to reduce the impact of

 

102,103

 

 

Side effects- Sedation is a potential side effect of someglucocorticosteroidof

side effects is probably insuf

these medications.

offset the adverse effects of methotrexate.Cyclosporin

 

 

104

105

 

and gold106,107 have also been shown to be effective in

Other controller therapies.

some patients. The macrolide, troleandromycin, has a

 

small steroid-sparing effect when used with syst

Role in therapy- Various therapeutic regimens to reducemethylprednisolone, but its effect may result from the dose of oral glucocorticosteroids required by patientsmacrolide decreasing metabolism of the glucocortico-

ASTHMA TREATMENTS

33

steroid and therefore not improving safety. However,anapotherylactic reactions, which may be life threatening effects of the long-term use of macrolides in asthmawell as severe exacerbations of asthma. Deaths from

108

 

 

specific immunotherapy have occurred in patients wi

remain under study. The use of intravenous

 

 

109-111

 

 

severe asthma.

 

 

 

 

immunoglobulin is not recommended. Data on a

 

 

 

 

 

 

human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reliever Medications

 

 

 

(TNF)-alpha suggest that the risk benefit equation does

 

 

 

 

 

 

not favor the use of this class of treatments in severe

 

 

 

 

 

 

216

 

 

Reliever medications act quickly to relieve

 

asthma .

 

 

 

 

 

 

bronchoconstriction and its accompanying acute symptom

Side effects- Macrolide use is frequently associated with

 

 

 

 

 

 

nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain and occasionally

 

Rapid-acting inhaled

2 -agonists.

 

 

 

liver toxicity. Methotrexate also causes gastrointestinal

 

 

 

 

 

symptoms, and on rare occasions hepatic and diffuse

Role in therapy- Rapid-acting inhaled-agonists are the

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

pulmonary parenchymal disease, and hematological and

 

medications of choice for relief of bronchospasm duri

teratogenic effects.

 

 

acute exacerbations of asthma and for the pretreatment

 

 

 

exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. They include

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

209

 

HFA

Allergen-specific immunotherapy.

 

 

salbutamol, terbutaline,REPRODUCE!fenoterol, levalbuterol,

 

 

reproterol, and pirbuterol. Formoterol, a long-acting-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

agonist, is approved for symptom relief because of it

Role in therapy- The role of specific immunotherapy in

 

 

OR

 

 

 

adult asthma is limited. Appropriate immunotherapy rapid onset of action, but it should only be used for t

 

 

 

purpose in patients on regular controller therapy with

requires the identification and use of a single well-defined

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

inhaled glucocorticosteroids.

 

 

 

clinically relevant allergen. The later is administered in

 

 

 

 

 

progressively higher doses in order to induce tolerance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

112

 

 

Rapid-acting inhaled-agonists should be used only on

Cochrane review that examined 75 randomized controlled

 

ALTER

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

an as-needed basis at the lowest dose and frequency

trials of specific immunotherapy compared to placebo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

required. Increased use, especially daily use, is a wa

confirmed the efficacy of this therapy in asthma in reducing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of deterioration of asthma control and indicates the ne

symptom scores and medication requirements, and improving

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reassess treatment. Similarly, failure to achieve a qu

allergen-specific and non-specific airway hyperresponsiveness.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sustained response-agonistto treatment during an exacer-

Similar modest effects were identified in a systematic review of

2

 

 

 

196

DO

 

bation mandates medical attention, and may indicate the

 

need for short-term treatment with oral glucocorticoste

sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Specific immunotherapy-

has long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing

 

 

 

 

 

the risk of adverse effectsMATERIALand the inconvenience of the

 

 

 

 

 

development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoSide effects- Use of oral -agonists given in standard

conjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment208 . termination

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

doses are associated with more adverse systemic effe

 

 

 

such as tremor and tachycardia than occur with inhaled

However, in view of the relatively modest effect of

 

 

 

 

 

 

allergen-specific immunotherapy compared to other

 

preparations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

treatment options, these benefits must be weighed against

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Systemic glucocorticosteroids.

 

 

 

prolonged course of injection therapy, including the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Role in therapy- Although systemic glucocorticosteroid

minimum half-hour wait required after each injection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

are not usually thought of as reliever medications, th

Specific immunotherapy should be considered only after

 

 

 

 

 

 

strict environmental avoidance and pharmacologic

 

important in the treatment of severe acute exacerbati

 

because they prevent progression of the asthma

 

 

 

 

 

intervention, including inhaled glucocorticosteroids, have

 

 

 

 

 

failed to control a patientis113ast.Thmaere are no studies

exacerbation, reduce the need for referral to emergency

 

 

 

departments and hospitalization, prevent early relapse

that compare specific immunotherapy with pharmacologic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

after emergency treatment, and reduce the morbidity o

therapy for asthma. The value of immunotherapy using

 

 

 

 

 

 

multiple allergens does not have support.

 

 

illness. The main effects of systemic glucocortic

 

 

in acute asthma are only evident after 4 to 6 hours. Oral

COPYRIGHTED

 

 

 

 

therapy is preferred and is as effective as intraven

Side effects- Local and systemic side effects may occur in

 

114

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hydrocortisone. A typical short course of oral gluco-

conjunction with specific immunotherapy administration.

 

 

115

 

 

 

 

 

corticosterods for an exacerbation is 40-50 mg

 

 

Reactions localized to the injection site may range from a

 

 

 

 

 

 

prednisolone given daily for 5 to 10 days depending on th minimal immediate wheal and flare to a large, painful,

severity of the exacerbation. When symptoms have delayed allergic response. Systemic effects may include

34 ASTHMA TREATMENTS

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]