
GINA2009
.pdf31. |
Kharitonov S, Alving K, Barnes PJ. Exhaled and nasal nitric |
47. |
Chan-Yeung M, Desjardins A. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness |
||||||||
|
oxide measurements: recommendations. The European |
|
and level of exposure in occupational asthma due to western |
||||||||
|
Respiratory Society Task ForceEur. Respir1997;10(7):1683J -93. |
|
|
red cedar (Thuja plicata). Serial observations before and after |
|||||||
32. |
Horvath I, Hunt J, Barnes PJ, Alving K, Antczak A, Baraldi E, et |
|
development of symptomsAm Rev. Respir Dis |
||||||||
|
1992;146(6):1606-9. |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
al. Exhaled breath condensate: methodological |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
recommendations and unresolved questionsEur Respir. |
J |
48. |
Cote J, Kennedy S, Chan-Yeung M. Sensitivity and specificity |
|||||||
|
2005;26:523-48. |
|
|
|
|
|
of PC20 and peak expiratory flow rate in cedar asthma. |
||||
33. |
Green RH, Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Parker D, |
|
J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;85(3):592-8. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Bradding P, et al.Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil49. Vandenplas O, Malo JL. Inhalation challenges with agents |
||||||||||
|
counts: a randomised controlledLancettrial. |
|
|
|
causing occupational asthmaEur. Respir1997;10(11):2612J -29. |
||||||
|
2002;360(9347):1715-21. |
|
|
|
|
50. Bright P, Burge PS. Occupational lung disease. 8. The |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
34. |
Smith AD, Cowan JO, Brassett KP, Herbison GP, Taylor DR. |
|
|
diagnosis of occupational asthma from serial measurements |
|||||||
|
Use of exhaled nitric oxide measurements to guide treatmentlungin function at and away fromThoraxwork.1996;51(8):857-63. |
||||||||||
|
chronic asthmaN Engl. J Med |
2005;352(21):2163-73. |
|
|
51. Chan-Yeung M, MacLean L, Paggiaro PL. Follow-up study of |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
35. |
Hoeppner VH, Murdock KY, Kooner S, Cockcroft DW. Severe |
|
|
232 patients with occupational asthma caused by western red |
|||||||
|
acute "occupational asthma" caused by accidental allergen |
|
cedar (Thuja plicata)J Allergy. |
Clin Immunol 1987;79(5):792-6. |
|||||||
|
exposure in an allergen challenge laboratoryAnn Allergy. |
|
|
|
|
|
REPRODUCE! |
||||
|
|
52. Nicholson PJ, Cullinan P, Taylor AJ, Burge PS, Boyle C. |
|||||||||
|
1985;55:36-7. |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identifica |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
36. |
Wilson NM. Wheezy bronchitis revisitedArch Dis.Child |
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|||
|
|
and management of occupational asthmaOccup. Environ Med |
|||||||||
|
1989;64(8):1194-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
2005;62(5):290-9. |
|
|
|
|
37. |
Martinez FD. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and53.thePrice DB, Tinkelman DG, Halbert RJ, Nordyke RJ, Isonaka S, |
||||||||||
|
pathogenesis of childhood asthmaPediatr. Infect Dis J2003;22 |
|
|
Nonikov D, et al.Symptom-based questionnaire for identifyin |
|||||||
|
(2 Suppl):S76-82. |
|
|
|
|
|
COPD in smokers. Respiration2006;73(3):285-95. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALTER |
|
|
|
38. |
Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD. |
|
54. |
Tinkelman DG, Price DB, Nordyke RJ, Halbert RJ, Isonaka S, |
|||||||
|
A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young childrenNonikovwith D, et al.Symptom-based questionnaire for |
||||||||||
|
recurrent wheezingAm J Respir. |
Crit Care Med 2000;162 |
|
|
differentiating COPD and asthmaRespiration. 2006;73(3):296-305. |
||||||
|
(4 Pt 1):1403-6. |
|
|
|
DO |
NOT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55. Szefler SJ, Mitchell H, Sorkness CA, Gergen PJ, O'Connor GT, |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
39. |
Sears MR, Greene JM, Willan AR, Wiecek EM, Taylor DR, |
|
Morgan WJ, et al. Management of asthma based on exhaled nitric |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
oxide in addition to guideline-based treatment for inner-cit |
|||||
|
Flannery EM, et al.A longitudinal, population-based,-cohort |
|
|||||||||
|
study of childhood asthma followed to adulthoodN Engl J Med. |
|
adolescents and young adults: a randomised controlled trial. |
||||||||
|
2003;349(15):1414-22. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lancet . 2008 Sep 20;372(9643):1065-72. |
|
|
||
40. |
Guilbert TW, Morgan WJ, Zeiger RS, Mauger DT, Boehmer SJ, |
|
56. |
Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Green RH, Brightling CE, |
|||||||
|
Szefler SJ,et al.Long-term inhaled corticosteroids in preschool |
Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. The use of exhaled nitric oxide to guide |
|||||||||
|
children at high risk forN EnglasthmaJ Med. |
|
|
|
asthma management: a randomized controlled trialAm J Respir. |
||||||
|
2006;354(19):1985-97. |
|
|
|
|
|
Crit Care Med 2007;176:231-7. |
|
|
||
41. |
Frey U, Stocks J, Sly P, Bates J. Specification for signal |
57. |
Bel EH. Clinical phenotypes of asthmaCurr. Opin Pulm Med |
||||||||
|
|
|
MATERIAL |
|
|
2004;10:44-50. |
|
|
|
||
|
processing and data handling used for infant pulmonary |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
function testing. RS/ATS Task Force on Standards for Infant |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Respiratory Function |
|
|
|
|
58. Wenzel SE. Asthma: defining of the persistent adult phenotype |
|||||
|
esting. European Respiratory Society/ |
Lancet 2006;368:804-13. |
|
|
|
||||||
|
American Thoracic SocietyEur. Respir2000;16(5):1016J |
-22. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
42. |
Sly PD, Cahill P, Willet K, Burton P. Accuracy of mini peak flow 59. Berry M, Morgan A, Shaw DE, Parker D, Green R, Brightling C, |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Pathological features and |
||||
|
meters in indicating changes in lung function in children with |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
asthma.BMJ 1994;308(6928):572-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
inhaled corticosteroid response of eosinophilic and non- |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
eosinophilic astThmaorax. 2007;62:1043-9. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
43. |
Mok Q, iesowicz AT. Foreign body aspiration mimicking |
60. Pavord ID, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, Wardlaw AJ. Non- |
|||||||||
|
asthma.Intensive Care Med |
1993;19(4):240-1. |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
eosinophilic corticosteroid unresponsiveLancetasthma. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
44. |
Place R, Morrison A, Arce . Vocal cord dysfunctionJ .Adolesc |
|
1999;353:2213-4. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health 2000;27(2):125-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45. Tarlo SM, Liss GM. Occupational asthma: an approach to diagnosis and managementCMAJ. 2003;168(7):867-71.
46.Tarlo SM. Laboratory challenge testing for occupational asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111(4):692-4.
DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION |
25 |
62. |
Simpson JL, Scott R, Boyle MJ, Gibson PG. Inflammatory |
|
76. |
van Rensen EL, Sont JK, Evertse CE, Willems LN, Mauad T, |
||||||
|
subtypes in asthma: assessment and identification usingHiemstra PS, Sterk PJ. Bronchial CD8 cell infiltrate and lung |
|||||||||
|
induced sputumRespirology. 2006;11:54-61. |
|
|
|
function decline inAmasthmaJ Respir. Crit Care Med |
|||||
63. |
van Veen IH, Ten Brinke A, Gauw SA, Sterk PJ, Rabe KF, Bel EH. |
|
2005;172:837-41. |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Consistency of sputum eosinophilia in difficult-to-treat77. asthma:HaldarP,a 5Pavord- |
ID, Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Brightling |
||||||||
|
year follow-up studyJ Allergy. |
Clin Immunol2009;124:615-7, 617 |
|
|
CE, Wardlaw AJ, Green RH. Cluster analysis and clinical asthma |
|||||
|
e1-2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
phenotypesAm. J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;178:218-24. |
||
64. |
Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, Busse WW, Clark TJ, |
|
78. |
Jayaram L, Pizzichini MM, Cook RJ, Boulet LP, Lemiere , |
||||||
|
Pauwels RA, Pedersen SE. Can guideline-defined asthma control |
Pizzichini E, Cartier A, Hussack P, Goldsmith H, Laviolette M, |
||||||||
|
be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL studyAm J . |
|
Parameswaran K, Hargreave FE. Determining asthma treatment |
|||||||
|
Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:836-44. |
|
|
|
|
|
by monitoring sputum cell counts: effect onEurexacerbations. |
|||
65. |
Bateman ED, Bousquet J, Keech ML, Busse WW, Clark TJ, |
|
|
Respir J2006;27:483-94. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Pedersen SE. The correlation between asthma control and health79. Taylor DR, Bateman ED, Boulet LP, Boushey HA, Busse WW, |
|||||||||
|
status: the GOAL studyEur. Respir2007;29:56J -62. |
|
|
Casale TB, Chanez P, Enright PL, Gibson PG, de Jongste JC, |
||||||
66. |
Osborne ML, Pedula KL, O'Hollaren M, Ettinger KM, Stibolt T, Buist |
|
Kerstjens HA, Lazarus SC, Levy ML, O'Byrne PM, Partridge MR, |
|||||||
|
Pavord ID, Sears MR, Sterk PJ, Stoloff SW, Szefler SJ, Sullivan |
|||||||||
|
AS, Vollmer WM. Assessing future need for acute care in adult |
SD, Thomas MD, Wenzel SE, eddelREPRODUCE!HK. A new perspective on |
||||||||
|
asthmatics: the Profile of Asthma Risk Study: a prospective health |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
concepts of asthma severity and controlEur Respir. J |
||
|
maintenance organization-based studyChest 2007;132:1151.-61. |
|
|
2008;32:545-54. |
|
OR |
||||
67. |
Thomas M, Kay S, Pike J, Williams A, Rosenzweig JR, Hillyer EV, |
|
|
|
||||||
80. |
Cockcroft DW, Swystun VA. Asthma control versus asthma |
|||||||||
|
Price D. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as a predictor of GINA |
|
severityJ Allergy. |
Clin Immunol1996;98:1016-8. |
||||||
|
guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a multinational cross- |
|
|
|||||||
|
sectional surveyPrim. Care Respir J2009;18:41-9. |
|
81. |
Chen H, Gould MK, Blanc PD, Miller DP, Kamath TV, Lee JH, |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sullivan SD. Asthma control, severity, and quality of life: qua |
||
68. |
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma |
|
theALTEReffect of uncontrolledJ AllergydiseaseClin. Immunol |
|||||||
|
Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: |
|
2007;120:396-402. |
|
|
|||||
|
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. August |
|
|
|||||||
|
2007. Available from: |
|
|
|
|
|
82. Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma: current |
|||
|
www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln |
|
NOTunderstanding, recommendations, and unanswered questions. |
|||||||
69. |
Khalili B, Boggs PB, Shi R, Bahna SL. Discrepancy between |
|
American Thoracic Societym. JA Respir Crit Care Med |
|||||||
|
2000;162:2341-51. |
|
|
|||||||
|
clinical asthma control assessment tools and fractionalDOexhaled |
|
|
|||||||
|
nitric oxideAnn Allergy. |
Asthma Immunol |
2008;101:124-9. |
- |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
70. |
Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life QuestionnaireEur . |
|
|
|||||||
|
Respir J1999;14:32-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71. |
Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Murray JJ, Pendergraft TB. Development of the asthma control |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
test: a survey for assessing asthmaJ AllergycontrolC .in Immunol |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2004;113:59-65. |
|
|
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
||
72. |
Liu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S, |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rosenzweig JC, Manjunath . Development and cross-sectional |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
validation of the Childhood Asthma ControlJ AllergyTest. Clin |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Immunol 2007;119:817-25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73. |
Vollmer WM, Markson LE, O'Connor E, Sanocki LL, Fitterman L, |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Berger M, Buist AS. Association of asthma control with health care |
|
|
|
||||||
|
utilization and qualityAm J ofResplifer Crit. Care Med |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
1999;160:1647-52. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74. |
Boulet LP, Boulet V, Milot J. How should we quantify asthma |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
control? A proposal. Chest 2002;122:2217-23. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
75. |
Schatz M, Mosen DM, Kosinski M, Vollmer WM, Magid DJ, |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
O'Connor E, Zeiger RS. Validity of the Asthma Control Test |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
completed at homeAm. J Manag Care |
|
2007;13:661-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
26 DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION

|
DO |
|
- |
COPYRIGHTED |
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
REPRODUCE! |
|
CHAPTER |
||
|
|
OR |
3 |
|
ALTER |
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
ASTHMA |
TREATMENTS

KEY POINTS:
ASTHMA MEDICATIONS: ADULTS
• Medications to treat asthma can be classified as |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Route of Administration |
|||
controllers or relievers. Controllers are medications |
|
|
||||
taken daily on a long-term basis to keep asthma |
Asthma treatment for adults can be administered in |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
under clinical control chiefly through their anti- |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
or “wet” aerosols* . InhalerREPRODUCE!devices differ in their e |
|||
|
|
|
different ways—inhaled, orally or parenterally (by |
|||
inflammatory effects. Relievers are medications |
|
|
||||
used on an as-needed basis that act quickly to |
subcutaneous, intramuscular, or intravenous injecti |
|||||
|
|
|
The major advantage of inhaled therapy is that drugs are |
|||
reverse bronchoconstriction and relieve its symptoms. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
delivered directly into the airways, producing highe |
|||
|
|
|
concentrations with significantly less risk of s |
|||
• Asthma treatment can be administered in different |
|
|
||||
ways—inhaled, orally, or by injection. The major side effects. |
|
|||||
advantage of inhaled therapy is that drugs are |
Inhaled medications for asthma are available as pressuri |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
delivered directly into the airways, producing higher |
|
|||||
local concentrations with significantly lessmeteredrisk of-dose inhalers (MDIs), breath-actuated MDIs, dry |
||||||
systemic side effects. |
|
|
powder inhalers (DPIs), soft mist inhalers, and nebuli |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
• Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are the most effectiveof drug delivery to the lower respiratory tract, depend |
||||||
controller medications currently available. |
on the form of the device, formulation of medication, |
|||||
|
|
|
|
ALTER |
|
|
• Rapid-acting inhaled-agonists are the |
|
|
particle size, velocity of the aerosol cloud or plume (wh |
|||
|
|
applicable), and ease with which the device can be used |
||||
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
medications of choice for relief of |
|
|
by the majority of patients. Individual patient pref |
|||
bronchoconstriction and for the pretreatment of |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
convenience, and ease of use may influence not only th |
|||
exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, in both adults |
|
|||||
and children of all ages. |
|
|
efficiency of drug delivery but also patient adheren |
|||
|
|
treatment and long-term control. |
||||
• Increased use, especially daily use, of reliever |
|
|
||||
|
DO |
Pressurized MDIs (pMDIs) require training and skill to |
||||
medication is a warning of deterioration of asthmaNOT |
|
|
||||
control and indicates the need to reassess |
coordinate activation of the inhaler and inhalation. |
|||||
Medications in these devices can be dispensed as a |
||||||
treatment. |
- |
|
||||
|
suspension in chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or as a solutio |
|||||
|
|
|||||
medications taken daily on MATERIALa long-term basis to keep |
||||||
|
|
2 |
||||
|
|
|
in hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs). For a pMDI containing |
|||
|
|
|
CFCs, the use of a spacer (holding chamber) improves |
|||
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
drug delivery, increases lung deposition, and may redu |
|||
|
|
|
|
1 |
||
|
|
|
local and systemic side effects. However, CFC inhaler |
|||
|
|
|
devices are being phased out due to the impact of CFCs |
|||
The goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain |
|
|
||||
clinical control. Medications to treat asthma can be |
upon the atmospheric ozone layer, and are being replaced |
|||||
by HFA devices. For pMDIs containing bronchodilators, |
||||||
classified as controllers or relieversControllers.are |
the switch from CFC to HFA inhalers does not result in |
|||||
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
||||
|
|
change in efficacy at the same nominal. However,dose |
||||
asthma under clinical control chiefly through their anti- |
|
|||||
|
|
|
for some glucocorticosteroids, the HFA formulations |
|||
inflammatory effects. They include inhaled and systemic |
|
|||||
|
|
|
provide an aerosol of smaller particle size that result |
|||
glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers, long-acting |
|
|||||
inhaled2 -agonists in combination with inhaled |
less oral deposition (with associated reduction in oral |
|||||
effects), and correspondingly greater lung depositio |
||||||
glucocorticosteroids, sustained-release theophylline, |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
This may result in greater systemic efficacy at eq |
|||
cromones, and anti-IgE. Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
ex-actuator doses, but also greater systemic exposure |
|||
the most effective controller medications currently |
|
3-5 |
||||
available.Relieversare medications used on an as- |
and risk of side effects. Clinicians are advised to consult |
|||||
the package inserts of each product to confirm the |
||||||
needed basis that act quickly to reverse |
|
|
||||
|
|
recommended dose equivalent to currently used drugs |
||||
bronchoconstriction and relieve its symptoms. They |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Some of these comparisons are providedFigurein 3-1 . |
include rapid-acting inh-aledgonists, inhaled 2
anticholinergics, short-acting theophylline, and short-acting oral 2 -agonists.
28 ASTHMA TREATMENTS
*Information on various inhaler devices available can be found on the GINA Website (http://www.ginasthma.org).

Pressurized MDIs may be used by patients with asthmaasthma, and when they are discontinued deterioration o of any severity, including during exacerbations. Breathclinicalcontrol follows within weeks to months in a actuated aerosols may be helpful for patients who haveproportion of patients14,15 .
difficulty using the “press and breathe” pressurized6 . InhaledMDIglucocorticosteroids differ in potency and Soft mist inhalers appear to require less coordinationbioavailability,. but because of relatively flat dose-r Dry powder inhalers are generally easier to use, but theyrelationships in asthma relatively few studies hav
require a minimal inspiratory flow rate and may proveable to confirm the clinical relevance of these191 . diffe
difficult for some patients. DPIs differ with respectFigure 3-1toliststhe approximately equipotent doses of dif fraction of ex-actuator dose delivered to the lung. Forinhaled glucocorticosteroids based upon the available
REPRODUCE!
some drugs, the dose may need to be adjusted when |
efficacy literature, but the categorization into dosa |
||
switching from an MDI to 7a.DPINebulized aerosols are |
categories does not imply that clear dose-response |
||
8 |
|
inrelationadultships have been demonstrated for each drug. |
|
rarely indicated for the treatment of chronic asthma. |
|||
|
|
The efficacy of some products varies when administe |
|
|
|
16 |
|
CONTROLLER MEDICATIONS |
via different inhaler. devicesMostof the benefit from |
||
inhaled glucocorticosteroids is achieved in adults at |
|||
|
|
||
Inhaled glucocorticosteroids* |
relatively low doses, equivalent to 400 ug of budesonid |
||
per day17 . Increasing to higher doses provides little |
|
|
|
|
benefit in terms of asthma control but increases th |
||||
Role in therapy- Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are currently |
17,18 |
OR |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
side effects. However, there is marked individual |
||||
the most effective anti-inflammatory medications for the |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
variability of responsiveness to inhaled glucocortico |
||||
treatment of persistent asthma. Studies have demonstrated |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
9 |
|
and because of this and the recognized poor adherence to |
||||
|
|
|
treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids, many pat |
|||||
their efficacy in reducing asthma, improvingsymptoms |
|
|||||||
9 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
quality of, lifeimproving lung function, decreasing airway |
|
will require higher doses to achieve full therapeuti |
||||||
10 |
|
11 |
NOT |
ALTER |
|
|
|
|
hyperresponsiveness, controlling airway inflammation, As tobacco smoking reduces the responsiveness to |
||||||||
|
|
12 |
|
inhaled glucocorticosteroids, higher doses may be |
||||
reducing frequency and severity of exacerbations, and |
||||||||
13 |
|
|
|
required in patients who smoke. |
||||
reducing asthma mortality. However, they do not cure |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
† |
|
Figure 3-1. Estimated Equipotent Daily Doses of Inhaled Glucocorticosteroids for Adults |
|
|||||||
Drug |
|
Low Daily Dose ( g)DO |
Medium Daily Dose ( g) |
High Daily Dose ( g) ‡ |
||||
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beclomethasone dipropionate |
200 - 500 |
|
>500 - 1000 |
|
>1000 - 2000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Budesonide* |
|
200 - 400 |
|
>400 - 800 |
|
>800 - 1600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciclesonide* |
|
80 - 160 |
|
>160 - 320 |
|
>320 - 1280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flunisolide |
|
500 - 1000 |
|
>1000 - 2000 |
|
>2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluticasone propionate |
|
100 - 250 |
|
>250 - 500 |
|
>500 - 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mometasone furoate* |
|
200 - 400 |
|
>400 - 800 |
|
>800 - 1200 |
|
|
|
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triamcinolone acetonide |
|
400 - 1000 |
|
>1000 - 2000 |
|
>2000 |
|
|
† Comparisons based upon efficacy data. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
‡ Patients considered for high daily doses except for short periods should be referred to a specialist for assessment to consider altern |
||||||||
controllers. Maximum recommended doses are arbitrary but with prolonged use are associated with increased risk of systemic side effect |
||||||||
* Approved for once-daily dosing in mild patients. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• The most important determinant of appropriate dosing is the clinicianis judgment of the patientis response to therapy. The clinician m |
||||||||
response in terms of clinical control and adjust the dose accordingly. Once control of asthma is achieved, the dose of medication should b |
||||||||
theminimum dose required to maintain control, thus reducing the potential for adverse effects. |
|
|
||||||
• Designation of low, medium, and high doses is provided from manufacturersi recommendations where possible. Clear demonstration of dose-r |
||||||||
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relationships is seldom provided or available. The principle is therefore to establish the minimum effective controlling dose in each |
||||||||
may not be more effective and are likely to be associated with greater potential for adverse effects. |
• As CFC preparations are taken from the market, medication inserts for HFA preparations should be carefully reviewed by the clinician for t correct dosage.
*In this section recommendations for doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids are given as “ /day budesonide or equivalent,” because a majority of the clinical literature on these medications uses this standard.
ASTHMA TREATMENTS |
29 |
To reach clinical control, add-on therapy with another prospective studies30-32 . One difficulty in establishing class of controller is preferred over increasing theclinicaldose significance of such adverse effects lie
of inhaled glucocorticosteroids. There is, however, a |
dissociating the effect of high-dose inhaled |
|
211 |
|
|
clear relationship between the dose of inhaled glucoglucocorticosteroids- |
from the effect of courses of |
corticosteroids and the prevention of severe acute glucocorticosteroids taken by patients with severe a |
||
exacerbations of asthma, although there appear to be |
There is no evidence that use of inhaled |
|
12 |
|
REPRODUCE! |
Mouth washing (rinsing with water, gargling, and spitting |
||
differences in response according to symptom/ |
glucocorticosteroids increases the risk of pulmonary |
inflammation phenotype. Therefore, some patients withinfections, including tuberculosis, and inhaled gl |
|||||||||
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
severe asthma may benefit from long-term treatmentcorticosteroidswith |
are not contraindicated in patients w |
||||||||
higher doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids. |
active tuberculosis. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
Side effects:Local adverse effects from inhaled |
Leukotriene modifiers. |
|
|||||||
glucocorticosteroids include oropharyngeal candidiasis, |
|
|
|
|
|||||
dysphonia, and occasionally coughing from upper airway |
|
|
|
|
modifiers include cystei |
||||
|
|
|
Role in therapy Leukotriene- |
||||||
irritation. For pressurized MDIs the prevalence of these |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
leukotriene 1 (CysLT1) receptor antagonists (montelukas |
||||||
effects may be reduced by using certain spacer. devices |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
1 |
pranlukast, and zafirlukast) and a 5-lipoxygenase inhib |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
|
|
(zileuton). Clinical studies have demonstrated that |
||||||
out) after inhalation may reduce oral candidiasis. The use |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
leukotriene modifiers have a small and variable broncho |
||||||
of prodrugs that are activated in the lungs but not in the |
|
|
34 |
||||||
|
|
|
dilator effect, reduce symptoms including, improvecough |
||||||
pharynx (e.g., ciclesonide), and new formulations and |
|
|
ALTER |
|
|
||||
lung function, and reduce airway inflammation and ast |
|||||||||
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
devices that reduce oropharyngeal deposition, may |
exacerbations. They may be used as an alternative |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
35-37 |
|
|
|
minimize such effects without the need for a spacer or |
|
|
|
38-40 |
|||||
mouth washing. |
|
|
treatment for adult patients with mild persistent, |
||||||
|
|
and some patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma res |
|||||||
|
|
|
well to leukotriene modifiers. However, when used alone |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are absorbed from the lung, |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
as controller, the effect of leukotriene modifiers a |
||||||
accounting for some degree of systemic bioavailability. |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
generally less than that of low doses of inhaled |
||||||
The risk of systemic adverse effects from an inhaled |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
DO |
glucocorticosteroids, and, in patients already on inhal |
||||||
glucocorticosteroid depends upon its dose and potency,NOT |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers cannot |
||||||
the delivery system, systemic bioavailability, first-pass |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
substitute for this treatment without risking t |
||||||
metabolism (conversion to inactive metabolites) in the |
|
42,43 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
asthma control . Leukotriene modifiers used as add-on |
||||||
liver, and half-life of the fraction of systemically- |
absorbed |
|
49-51,192 |
||||||
doses of 400 g or less budesonideMATERIALor equivalent daily. |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
20 |
the |
therapy may reduce the dose of inhaled glucocorticostero |
||||||
drug (from the lung and possibly. Therefore,gut) |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|||
|
|
|
required by patients with moderate to severe, andasthma |
||||||
systemic effects differ among the various inhaled |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
may improve asthma control in patients whose asthma is |
||||||
glucocorticosteroids. Several comparative studies have |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
not controlled with low or high doses of inhaled |
||||||
demonstrated that ciclesonide, budesonide, and fluticasone |
|
43,45-47 |
|
||||||
|
|
20- |
glucocorticosteroids. With the exception of one |
||||||
propionate at equipotent doses have less systemic effect |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
study that demonstrated equivalence in preventing |
||||||
23 . Current evidence suggests that in adults, systemic |
|
48 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
exacerbations, several studies have demonstrated that |
||||||
effects of inhaled glucocorticosteroids are not a problem at |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
leukotriene modifiers are less effective than long |
||||||
riskCOPYRIGHTEDwas considerably less than other common risk factors |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
inhaled2 |
-agonists as add-on therapy . A controlled |
|||||
|
|
|
release formulation of zileuton allows this medicati |
||||||
The systemic side effects of long-term treatment with high |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
used on a twice daily basis with effects equivalen |
||||||
doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids include easy |
|
|
|
|
203 |
||||
24 |
1,20 |
|
of standard zileuton used four times. a day |
||||||
bruising, adrenal suppression, and decreased bone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
mineral density. A meta-analysis of case-control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
25,26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side effects -Leukotriene modifiers are well tolerated, |
||||||
studies of non-vertebral fractures in adults using inhaled |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
and few if any class-related effects have so far been |
||||||
glucocorticosteroids (BDP or equivalent) indicated that in |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
recognized. Zileuton has been associated with liver |
||||||
older adults, the relative risk of non-vertebral fractures |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
toxicity, and monitoring of liver tests is recommended |
||||||
increases by about 12% for each 1000 µg/day increase in |
|
204 |
|
|
|
||||
during treatment with this medication. No associati |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
the dose BDP or equivalent but that the magnitude of this |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
found between Churg-Strauss syndrome and leukotrien |
||||||
|
213 |
|
modifiers after controlling for asthma drug use, alt |
||||||
for fracture in the older. Inhaledadult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
glucocorticosteroids have also been associated with is not possible to rule out modest associations given |
|||||||||
27 |
28,29 |
|
Churg-Strauss syndrome is so rare and so highly |
||||||
cataractsand glaucoma in cross-sectional studies, but |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|||
|
|
|
correlated with asthma severity. |
||||||
there is no evidence of posterior-subcapsular cataracts in |
|
|
|
30 ASTHMA TREATMENTS

Long-acting inhaled |
|
-agonists. |
Side effects- Therapy with long-acting inhaled-agonists |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
causes fewer systemic adverse effects—such as |
Role in therapy- Long-acting inhaled-agonists, |
cardiovascular stimulation, skeletal muscle tremor, a |
||
|
|
2 |
|
including formoterol and salmeterol, should not be usedhypokalemia—than oral therapy. The regular use of rapidas monotherapy in asthma as these medications do not acting2 -agonists in both short and long acting forms
appear to influence the airway inflammation in asthmalead. to relative refractoriness-agoniststo 74 . Data 2
They are most effective when combined with inhaledindicating a possible increased risk of asthma-relate
55,56,193 |
|
|
glucocorticosteroids, and this combination therapy isdeath associated with the use of salmeterol in a small |
||
|
75 |
|
the preferred treatment when a medium dose of inhaledgroup of individualsled to advisories from the US Food |
||
|
‡ |
§ |
glucocorticosteroid alone fails to achieve control ofand Drug Administration (FDA)and Health Canada that |
||
asthma. Addition of long-acting inhaled-agonists to a |
long-acting-agonists are not a substitute for inhaled |
|
2 |
2 |
|
daily regimen of inhaled glucocorticosteroids improvesoralglucocorticosteroids, and should only be used in symptom scores, decreases nocturnal asthma, improvescombination with an appropriate dose of inhaled
|
|
215 |
lung function, decreases the use of rapid-acting inhaledglucocorticosteroid as determined by a physician. A |
||
57-59 |
12,57-62 |
meta-analysis of all studies of salmeterol added to in |
2 -agonists, reduces the number of exacerbations, |
||
does not increase the risk of asthma-related |
glucocorticosteroids has concluded that this combina |
214 |
|
|
|
hospitalizations, and achieves clinical control of asthmadoes not increase the riskREPRODUCE!for asthma-related deaths or |
|||
in more patients, more rapidly, and at a lower dose of |
intubations when compared to inhaled glucocorticoster |
||
inhaled glucocorticosteroids than inhaled |
alone205 . No influence of-adrenergic receptor |
||
63 |
|
|
OR2 |
glucocorticosteroids given. alone |
phenotypes upon the efficacy or safety of long-acting |
||
|
2 -agonist therapy has been observed when administere |
||
This greater efficacy of combination treatment hasinledcombinationto |
with inhaled glucocorticosteroids whe |
||
2 |
ALTER |
|
the development of fixed combination inhalers thatbydeliverthe single inhaler for maintenance and relief met
both glucocorticosteroid and long-acti-agongist |
|
at a regular fixed dose in206adults. |
64, 65 |
|
NOT |
simultaneously (fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol, |
||
budesonide plus formoterol). Controlled studies haveTheophylline. |
||
shown that delivering this therapy in a combination inhaler |
||
|
DO2 |
Role in therapy- Theophylline is a bronchodilator and, |
is as effective as giving each drug separately.Fixed |
combination inhalers are more convenient for patients,whenmaygiven in a lower dose, has modest anti-inflammato |
||
|
- |
properties. It is available in sustained-release |
increase compliance, and ensure that the long acting- |
||
66 |
MATERIAL |
77-79 |
agonist is always accompanied by a glucocorticosteroidformulations. that are suitable for onceor twice-daily In addition, combination inhalers containing formoteroldosingand. Data on the relative efficacy of theophylline budesonide may be used for both rescue and maintenancelong.-term controller is lacking. However, available Both components of budesonide-formoterol given as evidence suggests that sustained-release theophyll needed contribute to enhanced protection from severelittle effect as a first80-line.It maycontprollervide benefit exacerbations in patients receiving combination therasapydd-forontherapy in patients who do not achieve control
maintenance and provide improvements in asthma |
on inhaled glucocorticosteroids .aloneAdditionally in |
|
67,194 |
|
81-83 |
control at relatively low doses of treatm. (Seent |
such patients the withdrawal of sustained-release |
|
COPYRIGHTED |
67-70 |
|
|
theophylline has been associated with deterioration of |
|
Appendix B, GINA Pocket Guide updated 2009 for |
||
information on Asthma Combination Medications For |
control. As add-on therapy, theophylline is less effec |
|
Adults and Children 5 Years and Older.) |
84 |
|
than long-acting inhaled-agonists. |
||
|
|
85,86 |
|
|
2 |
Long-acting 2 -agonists when used as a combination |
Side effects- Side effects of theophylline, particularl |
medication with inhaled glucocorticosteroids, may alsohigherbe doses (10 mg/kg body weight/day or more), are
used to prevent exercise-induced bronchospasm, and forsignificant and reduce their usefulness. Side ef this purpose may provide longer protection than rapidbereduced by careful dose selection and monitoring, an
acting inhaled-agonists. Salmeterol and formoterol |
generally decrease or disappear with continued use. |
71 |
|
2 |
|
provide a similar duration of bronchodilation and protectionAdverse effects include gastrointestinal symptom against bronchoconstrictors, but there are pharmacologicalstools, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, and even death. differences between them. Formoterol has a more rapidNausea and vomiting are the most common early events.
onset of action than salmeterol, which may make |
Monitoring is advised when a high dose is started, if |
72, 73 |
|
formoterol suitable for symptom relief as well as symptompatient develops an adverse effect on the usual dose,
prevention. |
when expected therapeutic aims are not achieved, and |
68 |
|
‡ http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/advisories-avis/prof/2003/serevent_hpc-cps_e.html § www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/advisories-avis/prof/2003/serevent_hpc-cps_e.html
ASTHMA TREATMENTS |
31 |
when conditions known to alter theophylline metabolismmedications, and fewer exacerbations90,91 . Further
exist. For example, febrile illness, pregnancy, and investigations will likely provide additional clari
anti-tuberculosis medicationsreduce blood levels of |
the role of anti-IgE in other clinical settings. |
87 |
|
theophylline, while liver disease, congestive heart failure,
and certain drugs including cimetidine, some quinolones,Side effects:As indicated by several studies involvin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
and some macrolides increase the risk of toxicity. asthmaLower patients ages 12 years and older, who were |
||||||||
doses of theophylline, which have been demonstratedalreadyto |
receiving treatment with glucocorticosteroid |
|||||||
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
89 |
provide the full anti-inflammatory benefit, areof this(inhaleddrug and/or oral) and long-acting-agonists, anti- |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92-94 |
associated with less frequent side effects, andIgEplasmaappears to be safe as add-on therapy. |
||||||||
theophylline levels in patients on low-dose therapy need |
|
|
|
|||||
not be measured unless overdose is suspected. |
|
Systemic glucocorticosteroids. |
||||||
Cromones: sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil |
|
Role in therapy- Long-term oral glucocorticosteroid |
||||||
sodium. |
|
|
|
therapy (that is, for periods longer than two weeks as a |
||||
Role in therapy– The role of sodium cromoglycate and |
|
glucocorticosteroid “burst”) may be required for sever |
||||||
|
uncontrolled asthma, but its use is limited by the r |
|||||||
nedocromil sodium in long-term treatment of asthma in |
|
|
REPRODUCE! |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
significant adverse effects. The therapeutic inde |
|||
adults is limited. Efficacy has been reported in patients |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
(effect/side effect) of long-term inhaled glucocort |
|||
with mild persistent asthma and exercise-induced |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
steroids is always more favorable than long-term syst |
|||
bronchospasm. Their anti-inflammatory effect is weak |
|
OR |
95,96 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
glucocorticosteroids in asthma.If oral glucocortico- |
|||
and they are less effective than a low dose of inhaled |
|
|
|
|||||
|
88 |
|
|
|
steroids have to be administered on a long-term basis, |
|||
|
|
|
|
attention must be paid to measures that minimize th |
||||
glucocorticosteroid. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
systemic side effects. Oral preparations are preferr |
|||
Side effects- Side effects are uncommon and include |
|
parenteralALTER(intramuscular or intravenous) for long-ter |
||||||
coughing upon inhalation and sore throat. Some patients |
|
|
|
|||||
find the taste of nedocromil sodium unpleasant. |
|
therapy because of their lower mineralocorticoid effe |
||||||
|
relatively short half-life, and lesser effects on s |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
muscle, as well as the greater flexibility of dosing t |
|||
Long-acting oral 2 -agonists. |
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
titration to the lowest acceptable dose that maintains c |
|||||
Role in therapy- Long acting oral -agonists include |
|
Side effects- The systemic side effects of long-term o |
||||||
|
|
2 |
DO |
|
||||
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
slow release formulations of salbutamol, terbutaline, and |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
or parenteral glucocorticosteroid treatment include |
|||
bambuterol, a prodrug that is converted to terbutaline in |
|
|
|
|||||
the body. They are used only on rare occasions when |
|
osteoporosis, arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypothalam |
||||||
|
pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, obesity, cataracts |
|||||||
additional bronchodilation is needed. |
|
|||||||
|
glaucoma, skin thinning leading to cutaneous striae a |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
easy bruising, and muscle weakness. Patients with as |
|||
Side effects- The side effect profile of long acting oral |
|
|
|
|||||
-agonists is higher than that of-inhaledagonists, and |
|
who are on long-term systemic glucocorticosteroids in |
||||||
|
form should receive preventive treatment for osteopor |
|||||||
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
||||
includes cardiovascular stimulation (tachycardia), anxiety, |
. Although it is rare, withdrawal of oral |
|||||||
|
|
MATERIAL |
|
(Figure 3-2 )97-99 |
||||
and skeletal muscle tremor. Adverse cardiovascular |
|
glucocorticosteroids can elicit adrenal failure or unm |
||||||
reactions may also occur with the combination of oral |
|
|
|
54,100 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
underlying disease, such as Churg-Strauss Syndrome. |
|||
-agonists and theophylline. Regular use of long-acting |
|
|
|
|||||
2 |
|
|
|
|
Caution and close medical supervision are recommended |
|||
oral 2 -agonists as monotherapy is likely to be harmful |
|
|
|
|||||
and these medications must always be given in |
|
when considering the use of systemic glucocorticos |
||||||
|
in patients with asthma who also have tuberculosis, |
|||||||
combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids. |
|
|||||||
|
parasitic infections, osteoporosis, glaucoma, diabetes |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Anti-IgE. |
|
|
|
severe depression, or peptic ulcers. Fatal herpes viru |
||||
|
|
|
infections have been reported among patients who are |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Role in therapy- Anti-IgE (omalizumab) is a treatment |
|
exposed to these viruses while taking systemic |
||||||
|
glucocorticosteroids, even short bursts. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
option limited to patients with elevated serum levels of IgE. |
|
|
||||||
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its current indication is for patients with severe allergic |
|
|
||||||
|
89 |
|
|
|
Oral anti-allergic compounds. |
|||
asthma who are uncontrolled on inhaled glucocortico- |
|
|
|
|
|
steroids, although the dose of concurrent treatment has
Role in therapy- Several oral anti-allergic compounds varied in different studies. Improved asthma control is
have been introduced in some countries for the treatm reflected by fewer symptoms, less need for reliever
32 ASTHMA TREATMENTS

Figure 3-2. Glucocorticosteroids and Osteoporosis
Asthma patients on high-dose inhaled glucocorticosteroids or oral glucocorticosteroids at any dose are considered at risk of d osteoporosis and fractures, but it is not certain whether this risk exists for patients on lower doses1 . Physof inhcialedns glucoc should consider monitoring patients who are at risk. The following summarizes monitoring and management but more detaile the management of steroid-induced osteoporosis are2,3 available.
Screening |
REPRODUCE! |
|
|
bodies |
|
of |
|
• Any patient with asthma who has been taking oral glucocorticosteroids for over 6 months duration at a mean daily dose of 7.5 mg |
|
prednisone/prednisolone or above. |
|
• Post-menopausal women taking over 5 mg prednisone/prednisolone daily for more than 3 months. |
|
• Any patient with asthma and a history of vertebral or other fractures that may be related to osteoporosis. |
|
Bone |
|
Osteoporosis |
|
• T-score below -2.5 (2.5 standard deviations below the mean value of young normal subjects of the same sex in patients 19-69 years |
|
• Z-score below -1 (1 standard deviation below the predicted value for age and sex). |
OR |
Follow-up scanning - Repeat scanning should be done: |
•In 2 years in those whose initial scan was not osteoporotic but in whom treatment (as above) with oral glucocorticosteroids
•In 1 year for those with osteoporosis on the first scan who are started on osteoporosis treatment.
Management
•General measures include avoidance of smoking, regular exercise, use of the lowest dose of oral glucocorticosteroid possi dietary intake of calcium.
•For women with osteoporosis up to 10 years post-menopausal offer bisphosphonates or hormone4,5,6 (Evidencetherapy A ).
•For men, pre-menopausal women, and women more than 10 years since menopause consider treatment with a bisphosphonate7 (Evidence A ).NOT
References
1.Goldstein MF, Fallon JJ, Jr., Harning R. Chronic glucocorticoid therapy-induced osteoporosis in patients with obstructiveChest 1999; 116:1733lung-1749. disease.
2.Eastell R, Reid DM, Compston J, Cooper C, Fogelman I, Francis RM -et al. A UK Consensus Group on management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis:DO
3. |
|
MATERIAL |
|
|
. |
Sambrook PN, Diamond T, Ferris L, Fiatarone-Singh M, Flicker , MacLennan A et al. Corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. Guidelines forAusttreatmentFam |
|||||
|
Physician 2001; 30:793-796. |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy |
|
|||
|
postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomizedJAMA controlled.2002;288:321-33.trial. |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, Cummings SR, Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, LeBoff M, Lewis CE, McGowan J, Neuner J, Pettinger M, Stefanick ML, Wactawski- |
|
|||
|
Wende J, Watts NB. "Effects of Estrogen Plus Progestin on Risk of Fracture and Bone MineralJAMA Density2003;290(13):1729."-1738. |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Brown JP, Josse RG. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosisCMAJ in. Canada2002;167:S1.-34. |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Homik J, Cranney A, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells G, Adachi et al. Bisphosphonates for steroid induced osteoporosisCochrane Database. Syst Rev |
2000;CD001347. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
of mild to moderate allergic asthma. These include with severe asthma have been proposed. These |
|
tranilast, repirinast, tazanolast, pemirolast, ozagrel,medications should be used only in selected patients celatrodast, amlexanox, and ibudilast. In general, theirunder the supervision of an asthma specialist, as th anti-asthma effect appears to be101limited,but studies on potential steroid-sparing effects may not outweigh the relative efficacy of these compounds are neededof serious side effects. Two meta-analyses of the s before recommendations can be made about their role insparing effect of low-dose methotrexate showed a smal
the long-term treatment of asthma. |
overall benefit, but a relatively high frequency of a |
||
|
effects. This small potential to reduce the impact of |
||
|
102,103 |
|
|
Side effects- Sedation is a potential side effect of someglucocorticosteroidof |
side effects is probably insuf |
||
these medications. |
offset the adverse effects of methotrexate.Cyclosporin |
||
|
|
104 |
105 |
|
and gold106,107 have also been shown to be effective in |
||
Other controller therapies. |
some patients. The macrolide, troleandromycin, has a |
||
|
small steroid-sparing effect when used with syst |
Role in therapy- Various therapeutic regimens to reducemethylprednisolone, but its effect may result from the dose of oral glucocorticosteroids required by patientsmacrolide decreasing metabolism of the glucocortico-
ASTHMA TREATMENTS |
33 |
steroid and therefore not improving safety. However,anapotherylactic reactions, which may be life threatening effects of the long-term use of macrolides in asthmawell as severe exacerbations of asthma. Deaths from
108 |
|
|
specific immunotherapy have occurred in patients wi |
||||||
remain under study. The use of intravenous |
|
|
|||||||
109-111 |
|
|
severe asthma. |
|
|
|
|
||
immunoglobulin is not recommended. Data on a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Reliever Medications |
|
|
|
|||
(TNF)-alpha suggest that the risk benefit equation does |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
not favor the use of this class of treatments in severe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
216 |
|
|
Reliever medications act quickly to relieve |
|
|||||
asthma . |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
bronchoconstriction and its accompanying acute symptom |
||||||
Side effects- Macrolide use is frequently associated with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain and occasionally |
|
Rapid-acting inhaled |
2 -agonists. |
|
|
|
|||
liver toxicity. Methotrexate also causes gastrointestinal |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
symptoms, and on rare occasions hepatic and diffuse |
Role in therapy- Rapid-acting inhaled-agonists are the |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|||
pulmonary parenchymal disease, and hematological and |
|
medications of choice for relief of bronchospasm duri |
|||||||
teratogenic effects. |
|
|
acute exacerbations of asthma and for the pretreatment |
||||||
|
|
|
exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. They include |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
HFA |
Allergen-specific immunotherapy. |
|
|
salbutamol, terbutaline,REPRODUCE!fenoterol, levalbuterol, |
||||||
|
|
reproterol, and pirbuterol. Formoterol, a long-acting- |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
agonist, is approved for symptom relief because of it |
||||||
Role in therapy- The role of specific immunotherapy in |
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
|||
adult asthma is limited. Appropriate immunotherapy rapid onset of action, but it should only be used for t |
|||||||||
|
|
|
purpose in patients on regular controller therapy with |
||||||
requires the identification and use of a single well-defined |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
inhaled glucocorticosteroids. |
|
|
|
|||
clinically relevant allergen. The later is administered in |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
progressively higher doses in order to induce tolerance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
112 |
|
|
Rapid-acting inhaled-agonists should be used only on |
||||||
Cochrane review that examined 75 randomized controlled |
|
ALTER |
2 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
an as-needed basis at the lowest dose and frequency |
||||||
trials of specific immunotherapy compared to placebo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
required. Increased use, especially daily use, is a wa |
||||||
confirmed the efficacy of this therapy in asthma in reducing |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
of deterioration of asthma control and indicates the ne |
||||||
symptom scores and medication requirements, and improving |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reassess treatment. Similarly, failure to achieve a qu |
||||||
allergen-specific and non-specific airway hyperresponsiveness. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
sustained response-agonistto treatment during an exacer- |
||||||
Similar modest effects were identified in a systematic review of |
2 |
|
|
|
|||||
196 |
DO |
|
bation mandates medical attention, and may indicate the |
||||||
|
need for short-term treatment with oral glucocorticoste |
||||||||
sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Specific immunotherapy- |
|||||||||
has long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
the risk of adverse effectsMATERIALand the inconvenience of the |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoSide effects- Use of oral -agonists given in standard |
|||||||||
conjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment208 . termination |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
doses are associated with more adverse systemic effe |
||||||
|
|
|
such as tremor and tachycardia than occur with inhaled |
||||||
However, in view of the relatively modest effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
allergen-specific immunotherapy compared to other |
|
preparations. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
treatment options, these benefits must be weighed against |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Systemic glucocorticosteroids. |
|
|
|
|||
prolonged course of injection therapy, including the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Role in therapy- Although systemic glucocorticosteroid |
||||||
minimum half-hour wait required after each injection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
are not usually thought of as reliever medications, th |
||||||
Specific immunotherapy should be considered only after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
strict environmental avoidance and pharmacologic |
|
important in the treatment of severe acute exacerbati |
|||||||
|
because they prevent progression of the asthma |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
intervention, including inhaled glucocorticosteroids, have |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
failed to control a patientis113ast.Thmaere are no studies |
exacerbation, reduce the need for referral to emergency |
||||||||
|
|
|
departments and hospitalization, prevent early relapse |
||||||
that compare specific immunotherapy with pharmacologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
after emergency treatment, and reduce the morbidity o |
||||||
therapy for asthma. The value of immunotherapy using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
multiple allergens does not have support. |
|
|
illness. The main effects of systemic glucocortic |
||||||
|
|
in acute asthma are only evident after 4 to 6 hours. Oral |
|||||||
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
therapy is preferred and is as effective as intraven |
|||||||
Side effects- Local and systemic side effects may occur in |
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
hydrocortisone. A typical short course of oral gluco- |
||||||
conjunction with specific immunotherapy administration. |
|
|
115 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
corticosterods for an exacerbation is 40-50 mg |
|
|
||||
Reactions localized to the injection site may range from a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
prednisolone given daily for 5 to 10 days depending on th minimal immediate wheal and flare to a large, painful,
severity of the exacerbation. When symptoms have delayed allergic response. Systemic effects may include
34 ASTHMA TREATMENTS