Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

PatientsChartingCourse

.pdf
Скачиваний:
8
Добавлен:
10.06.2015
Размер:
16.73 Mб
Скачать

xx

CONTENTS

3 Clinical Data as a Public Good for Discovery

69

Introduction, 69

Information Needs for a Learning Health System, 70

Farzad Mostashari

Opening Access to High-Value Data Sets, 74

Todd Park

Ensuring Data Integrity: Adressing Privacy Protection and Proprietary Concerns, 87

Don E. Detmer

4 Engaging Patients to Improve Science and

 

Value in a Learning Health System

95

Introduction, 95

Investing Patients in the Research and Continuous Improvement Enterprise, 96

Sharon F. Terry

Public and Patient Strategies to Improve Health System Performance, 103

James B. Conway

Communicating with Patients About Their Concerns, Expectations, and Preferences, 110

Karen Sepucha

5 Health Information Technology as the Engine for Learning

119

Introduction, 119

The Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology, 120

David Blumenthal

New Classes of Data, New Opportunities to Learn, 123

Daniel R. Masys, Jack M. Starmer, and Jill M. Pulley

Web 2.0 and Patient Engagement, 128

Kamal Jethwani and Joseph C. Kvedar

6 Patients, Clinical Decisions, and Health Information

 

Management in the Information Age

137

Introduction, 137

Public and Patient Information Access and Use as a Core Care Component, 138

George D. Lundberg

Health Information Technology–Based Approaches to Health Management, 145

Paul C. Tang

CONTENTS

xxi

 

Health and Disease Management Outside the Clinic Doors:

 

 

There’s an App for That!, 149

 

 

Doriane C. Miller

 

7

Applying Evidence for Patient-Centered Care: Standards and

 

 

Expectations

159

 

Introduction, 159

 

 

The Role of Evidence in Patient-Centered Care, 160

 

 

Dale Collins Vidal

 

 

Evidence Standards and Application: Right Care, Right Patient,

 

 

Right Time, 167

 

 

Clifford Goodman

 

 

Translation and Communication Needs for Care in the Face of

 

 

Uncertain Evidence, 177

 

 

Fran M. Visco

 

8

Team-Based Care and the Learning Culture

187

 

Introduction, 187

 

 

Practical Experience with Collaborative Models in the Health

 

 

Professions, 188

 

 

Allan S. Frankel and Michael Leonard

 

 

Measures and Strategies for Clinical Excellence and Continuous

 

 

Improvement, 196

 

 

Joyce Lammert

 

 

Care Cooperation and Continuity Across Clinicians, Facilities,

 

 

and Systems, 202

 

 

Alice Bonner, Craig Schneider, and Joel S. Weissman

 

9

Incentives Aligned with Value and Learning

213

 

Introduction, 213

 

 

Paying for Value and Science-Driven Care, 214

 

 

Michael E. Chernew

 

 

Generating Evidence to Guide Care, 219

 

 

Richard Gilfillan

 

 

Creating a Learning Culture, 228

 

 

Anne F. Weiss and Bianca M. Freda

 

10

Common Themes and Opportunities for Action

235

 

Introduction, 235

 

 

Common Themes, 235

 

 

Strategies for Moving Forward, 239

 

 

Looking Ahead to Next Steps, 242

 

xxii

 

CONTENTS

Appendixes

 

A

Workshop Agenda

247

B

Biographical Sketches of Workshop Participants

253

C

Workshop Attendee List

273

D

The Learning Health System Series: Workshop Common

 

 

Themes

283

Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACA

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010)

ACGME

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

AF4Q

Aligning Forces for Quality

AHRQ

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

AMA

American Medical Association

AMIA

American Medical Informatics Association

ARRA

American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (2009)

CCCP

Connected Cardiac Care Program

CER

comparative effectiveness research

CMS

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

CNVs

copy number variants

CRM

crew resource management

CRS

Care Records Service (UK)

DHMC

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

EGAPP

Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and

 

Prevention

EHR

electronic health record

eMERGE

electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics

EMR

electronic medical record

FCC

Federal Coordinating Council

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

xxiii

xxiv

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

GDP

gross domestic product

GEDDI

Genetics for Early Disease Detection and Intervention to

 

Improve Health Outcomes

GHP

Geisinger Health Plan

GHS

Geisinger Health System

GWAS

genome-wide association study

HCC

Hierarchical Condition Categories

HEDIS

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set

HHS

Department of Health and Human Services

HIPAA

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

HIT

health information technology

HITECH

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical

 

Health Act (2009)

HPV

human papillomavirus

IHI

Institute for Healthcare Improvement

INR

International Normalized Ratio

IOM

Institute of Medicine

IPADS

International Patient Decision Aids Standards

IRB

institutional review board

IT

information technology

JAMA

Journal of the American Medical Association

MA

Medicare Advantage

NBCC

National Breast Cancer Coalition

NCI

National Cancer Institute

NHS (UK)

National Health Service

NIH

National Institutes of Health

NWHIN

Nationwide Health Information Network

OECD

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OMB

Office of Management and Budget

ONC

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information

 

Technology

PAMF

Palo Alto Medical Foundation

PCMH

patient-centered medical home

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

PheWAS

phenome-wide scanning

PHR

personal health record

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

xxv

PSA

prostate-specific antigen

 

PXE

pseudoxanthoma elasticum

 

RCT

randomized controlled trial

 

REP

Rochester Epidemiology Project

 

RPIWs

Rapid process improvement workshops

 

RWJF

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

 

SCP

shared care plan

 

SHARP

Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects

 

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

 

SORT

Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy

 

SR

systematic review

 

SSRI

selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

 

STEPPS

Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient

 

 

Safety

 

USPSTF

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

 

VAP

ventilator-associated pneumonia

 

VMMC

Virginia Mason Medical Center

 

Synopsis and Overview

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

The prosperity of a nation is tied fundamentally to the health and well-being of its citizens. It follows, then, that citizens—each one a past, current, or future patient—should represent both the healthcare system’s unwavering focus, and its fully engaged agents for change. This precept has several major implications. It means that the quality of health care should not be judged solely by whether clinical decisions are informed by the best available scientific evidence, but also by whether care accounts for a patient’s personal circumstances and preferences. It implies that careful listening should be the starting point for every patient encounter. And it suggests that the success of and innovations in healthcare delivery should depend on direct consumer engagement in the design of healthcare models and their aims.

One of the central lessons of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report

Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century is that much of health care in the United States has lost its focus on the patient (IOM, 2001). Instead, the healthcare system has been designed and motivated primarily by the perspectives of its component facilities, companies, payers, and providers. Crossing the Quality Chasm urges that care be refocused around six aims: care should be safe, effective, patientcentered, timely, efficient, and equitable. In the decade since the report was published, it has become even clearer that citizen and patient engagement is central to taking advantage of advances in the personalization of care based on genetics, preferences, and circumstances. Building off the Chasm

1

2

PATIENTS CHARTING THE COURSE

report, a learning health system requires that patients help chart the course and operation of the learning process.

In this context, the IOM, under the auspices of the Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care, focused the tenth workshop in its Learning Health System series on public and patient engagement and leadership­. This volume, Patients Charting the Course: Citizen Engagement and the Learning Health System, presents a summary of the issues and perspectives addressed at that meeting.

As discussed by many participants in the meeting, most health systems today are not centered on patients. Instead, volume drives service; supply influences demand; and clinician—not patient—preferences shape practice (Wennberg et al., 2007). The notion of patient-centeredness often still feels unfamiliar, even disruptive, for many of those unexposed to the advantages of such a culture (Berwick, 2009).

Patients have shown an interest in becoming more involved and learning more about their conditions. A Pew Research Center Survey found that 61 percent of adults go online to seek information on specific diseases, medical treatments, and other health subjects. Although the increased availability­ of health information is important, new communication approaches are needed to provide information that is reliable, relevant, and understandable so patients can make informed healthcare decisions.

Data and information are a first step toward improving communications between providers and patients. Providers will increasingly need to discuss with patients the risks and benefits of competing treatment options and engage patients in shared decision making about their treatment choices. This represents a shift away from the historical model of medicine toward one in which physicians and patients work together to manage complex conditions, and make decisions on the basis not only of the best medical knowledge, but also the patient’s life circumstances, preferences, and personal biology.

Recent legislative efforts and national interest around these issues have provided an important impetus for progress and prompted a reassessment of priorities and the articulation of practical next steps for developing a learning health system. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) included more than $1.1 billion to enhance the nation’s capacity for comparative effectiveness research and nearly $20 billion for the adoption and use of health information technology through the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Through incentives for the meaningful use of electronic medical records, the HITECH Act will encourage the adoption of electronic medical records by clinician practices and hospitals, which will enable improved access to clinical information, coordination of care across multiple healthcare settings, and a comprehensive record of a patient’s medical history. This will provide

SYNOPSIS AND OVERVIEW

3

the foundation for many aspects of the learning health system, including expanded clinical data for research, patient access to their own health information, and new models of care outside the traditional clinical encounter.

Signed into law one week before the workshop, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) underscored the importance of patient choice and engagement, including provisions to promote choice, accountability, consideration of patient preferences, and shared healthcare decision making. As this law is implemented, new opportunities will become available for establishing innovative models to deliver care, creating incentives to coordinate and improve care quality and value, and expanding the clinical workforce.

THE ROUNDTABLE AND THE

LEARNING HEALTH SYSTEM SERIES

The IOM Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care has since 2006,- provided a venue for health leaders from various stakeholder sectors—health professionals, patients, health system leaders, insurers, employers, manufacturers, information technology, research—to work cooperatively to address their common interest in improving the effectiveness and efficiency of health care. The Roundtable members have set the goal that, by 2020, 90 percent of clinical decisions will be supported by accurate, timely, and up-to-date information and will reflect the best available evidence. Over the past five years, the Roundtable’s Learning Health System series of workshops has identified and considered the key elements whose transformation can be central to achieving this goal: clinical research, clinical data, information technology, evidence standards, healthcare tools, caregiver culture, patient engagement, and financial incentives. For each of these elements, the workshops have explored priorities and approaches integral to harnessing interests and expertise across healthcare sectors to drive improvements in the value of medical care delivered in the United States. The following publications summarizing these workshops offer perspectives on the issues involved, and identify priorities and projects in need of cooperative stakeholder engagement:

The Learning Healthcare System (2007)

Evidence-Based Medicine and the Changing Nature of Health Care (2008)

Leadership Commitments to Improve Value in Health Care: ­Finding Common Ground (2009)

Value in Health Care: Accounting for Cost, Quality, Safety, Outcomes, and Innovation (2010)

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]