Перевод МММ / 3_%%%% 0648bacc A Study of Nonequilibrium Diffusion Modeling-
.pdfFor individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 39, NO. 3. MARCH 1992
A Study of Nonequilibrium Diffusion Modeling-
Applications to Rapid Thermal Annealing and
Advanced Bipolar Technologies
Bruno Baccus, Tetsunori Wada, Associate Member, IEEE, Naoyuki Shigyo, Senior Member, IEEE, Masayuki Norishima, Hiroomi Nakajima, Kazumi Inou, Toshihiko Iinuma,
and Hiroshi Iwai. Associate Member, IEEE
Abstract-A |
new nonequilibrium diffusion model has been de- |
to predict diffusion profiles. Earlier technologies could be |
||||||||||
veloped aiming to study theinfluence of point |
defectson dopant |
simulated with steady-state diffusion models, which con- |
||||||||||
redistribution, specially for transient |
enhanced diffusion. The |
sider macroscopic or phenomenological diffusivities [11. |
||||||||||
coupled equations for point defects, substitutional impurities, |
||||||||||||
However, in order to obtain extremely shallow junctions |
||||||||||||
and impuritiedpoint defect pairs are solved under nonequilib- |
||||||||||||
riumcondition. |
Charged |
species are included and Poisson |
needed in advanced MOS and bipolar technologies, strong |
|||||||||
equation is solved. The characteristics and domain of validity |
constraints arise for the thermal budget [2] and the influ- |
|||||||||||
of this model have been investigated. From the numerical point |
ence of point defectsmust be explicitly included. Among |
|||||||||||
ofview, |
it is found that a decoupled scheme solves efficiently |
others, one of themost striking example is the anomalous |
||||||||||
the system of equations, together with |
an automatic time step |
|||||||||||
transientenhanceddiffusion |
afterionimplantation[3]. |
|||||||||||
selection. Moreover,indications are suggested to predict |
the |
|||||||||||
conditions under which a steady-state model can be used. In |
Suchbehaviorsaffectdrasticallyactualdeviceperfor- |
|
||||||||||
thecase |
of high-concentrationpredeposition,enhanced |
dif- |
mance [4]. This typical example demonstrates clearly the |
|||||||||
fusion is observed and concave or exponential profiles are ob- |
pointdefectsimportance,moreoverunderstrong |
non- |
||||||||||
tained for very short-time diffusion. These effects are amplified |
equilibrium configuration. Generally speaking, the advent |
|||||||||||
by the nonequilibrium treatment. Applications are presented |
||||||||||||
of low thermal budget raises the question of the validity |
||||||||||||
for oxide diffusion sources, |
in which insight is needed during |
|||||||||||
theearly |
steps of diffusion. Moreover, the |
generality of |
the |
of process models for these new conditions. |
|
|||||||
model is confirmed by long-time diffusion behavior and by the |
From the modeling point of view, significant progress |
|||||||||||
influence of phosphorus diffusion on boron buried layer. |
|
has been achieved in the last |
few years about the under- |
|||||||||
Anomalous effects observed during RTA steps after ion im- |
||||||||||||
standingofpointdefectsanddopantdiffusion[5].The |
||||||||||||
plantation are also well reproduced by the model, in terms of |
||||||||||||
duration of the transient diffusion and in terms of the amount |
first simulation works including point defects focused on |
|||||||||||
of displacement, as a function of temperature. Successful com- |
oxidation-enhanceddiffusionproblems |
[6], [7]. Then, |
||||||||||
parisons with experiments are reported for boron and for ac- |
they were generalized, based on the concept of point de- |
|||||||||||
tual bipolar structures,with coupled arseniclboron diffusion in |
fectimpuritypairs |
[8]-[lo]. These latter models |
rely on |
|||||||||
a 0.5-pm Bi-CMOS process. Furnace and RTA are,also com- |
||||||||||||
physical principles and allow deep insight into the diffu- |
||||||||||||
pared forthese examples. The importanceof the initial amount |
||||||||||||
of point defects after ion implantation is discussed. Finally, the |
sionmechanisms |
[l I]. Equilibriumisassumedbetween |
||||||||||
electrical influence of such problems is evaluated for a bipolar |
point defects and impurities, and nonequilibrium is taken |
|||||||||||
technology. The effects of damage on two-dimensional diffusion |
into account only for bulk recombination. These assump- |
|||||||||||
are alsoinvestigated.These |
results have been obtained using |
tions are valid as long as the concentrations of impurities |
||||||||||
always the same values of the parameters, validating the gen- |
||||||||||||
are much greater than the species including interstitialsor |
||||||||||||
erality of the model. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
vacancies [ 121. Althoughthisistheusualcase,itis |
no |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
I. INTRODUCTION |
|
|
more verified during the early stages |
of diffusion follow- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
ing ion implantation, since not only interstitials o r vacan- |
||||||||
HECONTINUOUSdecrease |
in devicedimensions |
|||||||||||
cies but also impurityipointdefectpairsexceedtheim- |
||||||||||||
Tinduces new demands on process simulation, in order |
||||||||||||
purityconcentration. A completenonequilibrium formu- |
||||||||||||
Manuscript received March 22, 1991;revised June 20, 1991, Thereview |
lation is thus required in this kind of situation. |
|
||||||||||
Nonequilibriumdiffusionmodelinghasbeen |
first pro- |
|||||||||||
of this paper was arranged by Associate Editor N.Kawamura |
|
posed by Hu [131, in order to explain the anomalous dif- |
||||||||||
B. Baccus was with the ULSI Research Center, Toshiba Corporation, 1. |
||||||||||||
KomukaiToshiba-cho,Saiwai-ku,Kawasaki |
210, Japan.Heis now with |
fusion of phosphorus. However, the feasibility andpoten- |
||||||||||
ISEN, 59046 Lille Cedex, France. |
|
|
|
tiality of thistype |
of modelinghavebeendemonstrated |
|||||||
T. Wada, N. Shigyo, H . Nakajima, K. Inou, T. Iinurna. and H. Iwai are |
onlyrecently by MulvaneyandRichardson.Phosphorus |
|||||||||||
withthe |
ULSI ResearchCenter,ToshibaCorporation. |
I , Komukai To- |
||||||||||
shiba-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki 210, Japan, |
|
|
|
diffusion has been studied [14]-[ 161 and it has been shown |
||||||||
M.NorishimaiswiththeSemiconductorDeviceEngineeringLabora- |
|
that transient diffusiondue toion-implantation damage can |
||||||||||
tory, Toshiba Corporation, 1, Komukai Toshiba-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki |
bealsoqualitativelyreproduced |
[17]. A formulationin- |
||||||||||
210, Japan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
IEEE Log Number 9105348. |
|
|
|
|
cluding boron, interstitial, and |
boron-interstitial |
pair has |
|||||
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
BACCUS P I n l . : STUDY OF NONEQUlLlBRlUM DIFFUSIONMODELING |
649 |
been also reported for the study of boron diffusion during RTA (181, and coupling with the results of Monte Carlo ion-implantation calculations has been studied[191. However,thedevelopmentofsuchmodelsisstillinits first stages and numerous questions arise about complete nonequilibriumdiffusionmodeling.Theprecisecharacteris-
tics have not been studied indetail-especially |
for tran- |
|
sientphenomena-northedomain |
of validityhasbeen |
|
discussed. Finally, comparisons |
with experiments are very |
|
limited.
It is the goal of this paper to answer these questionsIn. particular,it will beshownthatwithinageneralframework, the same parameter values can describe a large variety of experimental results, thus establishing the coherence and validity of nonequilibrium modeling. In the case
ofhighconcentrationandshorttimediffusion,unusual |
|
profiles areobtainedandarethedirectsignature |
of mi- |
grationviaintermediatespeciesThenonequilibrium. |
|
treatment enhances this effect. and from these test examples,amethodissuggestedtodeterminetheconditions underwhichnonequilibriumdominates or not,thusallowing the subsequent use of a steady-state formulation, as in [8]-[lo], in ordertoreducethe CPU time. Applications are shown in the case of doping from doped oxide film.Moreover, by comparisonwithotherexperiments,
it is deduced that the amountof interstitials generated during phosphorus diffusion and its influence on boron buried layer can be quantitatively evaluated. The effects of ionimplantation damage on diffusion are also investigated and comparedwithexperimentsforboronandarsenic/boron coupleddiffusion inbipolardevices.The influenceof temperature, RTA versus furnace annealing, and arsenic- ion-implantation damage on boron diffusion are successfullyreproduced.Theimportanceofinitialdefectdistributionsisalsodiscussed.Finally,theimpactofsuch
modeling on bipolar transistor operation is presented and two-dimensional effects are reported.
11. THEMODEL
A. Generalities
The present understanding of impurity diffusion in siliconfavorsthepairingofsubstitutionalimpuritieswith
point defects (interstitials and vacancies). These pairs dif-
fuse until a recombinationbyvariouswaysappears |
181, |
[9], [111, [131. Suchmechanismsofdiffusion by |
inter- |
mediatespecieshavebeeninvestigatedveryrecently |
by |
theoreticalcalculations [20] and by some specialexperimental procedures [2 I]. These studies furnish significant support for the physical backgroundof the present model. For the sake of simplicity, its worthwhile to write briefly theequationsinasimplecaseandprogressivelypresent thevariousimprovementsandcharacteristics.Consider-
ing the diffusion of adopant A , theinvolvedkineticreactions can lie described as follows:
I + V = (0) |
(1) |
A + V 2 ( A V ) |
(2) |
A + I |
( A I ) |
(3) |
( A I ) + V + A |
(4) |
|
(AV) + I |
A |
(5) |
where I , V , ( A I ) , and ( A V ) represent interstitial, vacancy, dopant-interstitial,anddopant-vacancypairs,respec- tively.Reaction(1)isthebulkrecombination,reaction
(2) describesthevacancymechanism,reaction (3) is known as “kickout,” and reaction (4) describes the dissociative or Frank-Turnbull mechanism. The above mentionedstudy [21] supportsthe kick-outreactionandthe importanceoftheFrank-Turnbullmechanismwassug- gestedin [22] andconfirmed in the case of phosphorus diffusion[16].Ifwe consideronlyreactions (1)-(3) (including reactions (4) and (5) is straightforward), the system of equations reads
aI |
a 2~ |
-at = Dl |
- kbA * I + k,(AI) - k , ( W - I*V*) |
aA
-at = -kf2A V + k,(AV) - kbA . I + k,(AI)
(10)
where DXrefers to the diffusivity of the species X , I* and V * to the interstitial and vacancy equilibrium concentrations, kfmand kfmto the forward and reverse rates of reaction numbered a.This set of equations is exactly the one presented in [14].
However, for practicalapplications, it isnecessary to incorporatechargedspecies. In [15]:[16]they areintroducedalsoundernonequilibriumconditionUnfortu.-
nately, this leads to an extremely large number of equa-
tions, so. |
asproposedin |
[18]-but |
withadifferent |
treatment-all |
the charged species are considcred to be in |
||
equilibriumwiththeneutralones.Thisisareasonable assumption since these clectric processes are much faster than reactions such as (1)-(S). This can be verified from
Shockley-Read-Halltheory |
[IS].UsingBoltzmann |
sta- |
|
tistics,thenegativechargedvacancy |
V - , forexample, |
||
can be expressed as a function of the neutral vacancy |
V o |
||
where n is the electron concentration, n, the intrinsic elec-
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
m |
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES. VOL. 39. NO. 3, MARCH 1992 |
tronconcentration, ei theintrinsicFermilevel, |
eV- the |
energylevelof V - , k Boltzmann'sconstant,and |
T the |
temperature in Kelvins. In the present model, the following charged point defects species are included:
V - , V = , V + + . Theelectronconcentrationiscalculated
by solving the Poisson equation, as it was shown to give somedifferencescompared to thechargeneutralityformulation, if we focuse on short diffusion times [23]. The set ofkineticreactions (1)-(5) isgeneralizedforeach charged species. For instance, we give here only four reactions, assuming that dopant A is a donor
A + + v- e (AV)O |
(12) |
||
A + + v= 6 (AV)- |
(13) |
||
(AV)O + I - |
e A + + 2n |
(14) |
|
(AI)' |
+ V - |
e A' + 2n. |
(15) |
Itisthenpossibletorewrite |
in ageneralmannerthe |
||
systemofequations |
(6)-(lo), takingintoaccountthe |
|
|
charged species. For example, the continuity equation for ( A V )pairs becomes, when including the electricfield term
from reactions such as (14), (1 5 )
The same type of equation is written for each diffusing species,exceptfortheequationforsubstitutionaldopants,thatcontainsonlykineticterms.Forarsenicand phosphorus, five coupled equations are needed. However, as boron diffuses primary through interactions with interstitials ([5], [20]), only four equations are used for I , V , B , ( B I ) . It should be noted that even if ( B V ) pairs are not considered, vacancies must be introduced in the calcula-
tions,becausetheycanplayaroleviareactions |
(1) or |
(4). Finally,theboundaryconditionsareusualforthis |
|
kind of modeling. At the surface, we have |
|
a(Av)O |
|
a(Av)- |
|
|
-- |
- |
at |
+- at |
|
dr |
|
av |
||
|
|
|
|
DV - = K,,(V- V * ) |
|
|
|
|
ax |
where *is the electrostatic potential. The last term in the right-handsidecontainskineticstermslikethosede-
scribed by reactions (1)-(5), or (12)-(15). Ontheother hand, the charged point defecthmpurity pairs are also expressed as a function of the neutral ones. For this purpose,
if we assume equilibrium for the two reactions |
(12) and |
B. Numerical Aspects |
|
|||||
(13), we obtain |
|
IC(:(AV)' |
|
|
||||
|
|
The resulting equations and algorithms have been im- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
('4v)- |
= kr12kfi3- (?)(AV)' |
= |
(17) |
plemented in the two-dimensional multilayer process sim- |
||||
kr1,kfiz 6'=- ni |
|
|
ulator IMPACT4 1241, using the Finite Element Method. |
|||||
where 6' |
depends on the energy level of V = . Substituting |
Wereporthereonlythespecialproblemsrelatedtothe |
||||||
presentmodel,sincetheotheralgorithmshavebeenal- |
||||||||
(17) into (16), we get |
|
|
|
|
ready discussed [24], [25]. |
|
||
[I +I)K:( |
|
|
|
|
As we will focus on the influence of defects on the ac- |
|||
|
|
|
|
tiveregion of devices, the same precision |
in defectand |
|||
|
|
|
|
dopant profiles descriptions must be achieved. Hence, the |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
same mesh is used for all the involved species. More se- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
vere constraints must |
be satisfied for time discretization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The implicit scheme has been used, together with an au- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
tomatic time step selection in the same way as proposed |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
in [lo]. Inthecase |
of RTAafter ionimplantation(see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section IV), the time step ranges typically from 0.1 ps at |
||
Two interesting consequences follow: we obtain an ef- |
the beginning of the diffusion, where nonequilibrium ki- |
|||||||
neticreactionsdominate,toseveralseconds |
or several |
|||||||
fectivediffusivitywhichdependsonelectronconcentra- |
minutes, once the equilibrium state is established. |
|||||||
tion, which is usually the case[SI, [8]. Secondly, the term |
One very important feature of the model is that it con- |
|||||||
including the variationof electron concentration with time |
tains kinetic terms which are several orders of magnitude |
|||||||
can be expressed as a function of kinetic terms, coming |
above the usualdiffusiveterms.This is specially true in |
|||||||
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
MODELINGNONEQUILIBRIUMDIFFUSIONBACCUSOF er a / . : STUDY |
65 I |
the case of high concentrations,for interstitial or vacancy recombinationviareactionslike (l), (4)-(5). As these
terms are directly proportional to the concentrations (see
ProcedureiSource
(6)-(lo)), very high precision must be achieved. For this purpose, the stopping criterion for the Newton-Raphson loopswasdefinedasarelativechangeinconcentrations nogreaterthan 5 X These Newton-Raphsoniter- ations include the Poisson equation and continuity equations for the species. On the other hand,inorder to ensure numericalstability,themass-lumpingtechniqucisused
for both temporal and kinetic terms. Finally,coupledanddecoupledschemeshavebeen
compared. It was found that the same results are obtained with both methods, whatever the type of conditions (predeposition,diffusionafterionimplantation,etc.).Concerningthe matrix solvers,thedecoupledschemeuses ILDU-CG [24] andthecoupledoneuses ablock-BCG method [26]. The comparison of CPU times for these two schemes depends heavily on the choice of parameters. If a high and unphysicalvalue of bulk recombination is used [14], [15], thecoupledscheme is significantlyfaster. However, when using the complete model, inwhich the recombinationofinterstitialsandvacanciesdependson
dopant concentrations and is distributed among several reactions,theCPUtimebecomescomparable.Theseare remarkable and very interesting results. Moreover, a bo-
ronlarsenicsimulationrequiressevencoupledequations
( I , V, ( A s l ) ,( A s V ) ,As, (BZ), ) . Thus prohibitive memory resources would be needed for a coupled resolution. This leads to the conclusionthat the decoupled method is the most practical. From the CPU time point of view, depending on conditions,afactorbetween 100 and 500 is obtained,comparedtostandardsteady-statemodel
without point defects [24].
C. Parameter Values
One of thecharacteristics of suchmodelsisthatthey contain a large number of parameters, thusit is extremely important to describe the procedure for their extraction. Moreover,fromageneralpointofvicw,itisofmajor interesttodiscussthe way tovalidatetheobtainedformulation.
Consideringfirstthebulkrecombination(generalized
for charged species, but expressed here only for the neutral ones), the associated term is expressed as
k , = 4uR(D, + Dv)exp (~ y ) (24) where A E,, is the bamer energy for recombination andR
the capture radius. |
Whendefined in this way.bulk recom- |
|
binationhastheusual |
andvery |
low value,and not the |
unphysicalvalueusedifreactions |
(4)and ( 5 ) arene- |
|
glected [14], [15]. In a general manner, the kinetic rates depend on the diffusivity ofthe species and on somebindingenergy.Forexample,theforwardandreverseterms
of reaction (12) are given by
kf = 4rRDv- |
(25) |
TABLE I
PROCEDURE FOR PARAMETERSVALUES DETEKMlNATlON
Parameter |
|
|
|
|
R |
Mathiot-afterPfister |
|
[SI |
|
I*, D , |
Bronnerafter |
[27] |
|
|
v*, Dv |
thermodynamicfrom |
|
1151 |
|
Ebwv,, Ebv,,, |
frompredepositlon |
calculationskomparisons with |
||
DAv, 0 4 1 |
standardsteady-state |
modelsor |
experiments [281 |
|
A E,, |
highfrom-concentrationpredeposition |
and |
||
|
diffusion after ion implantation |
|
||
where nh is the number of lattice sites andEb(Av,~the binding energy of(AV)’ pair. For more complex reactions such as(14), (15), theforwardterm isexpressedinthesame way as (25), but during the course of this study, we found
necessary to introduce also a barrier energy for |
this type |
|
of reaction, asfor direct I-V recombination. It |
is |
sufficient |
to assume the same value of bamer energy for all con- |
||
cernedreactions,thusitisalsospecifiedas |
AE,”. The |
|
reversetermsofreactions (14), (15) are obtained by assuming equilibrium for the reactions[161. Hence they depend also on I* and V * .
The procedure to determine the parameter values is ex-
plained inTable |
I. Inorderto limitthe number ofun- |
knowns, we make |
first several assumptions. The capture |
radius R is chosen to be the same for all the reactions, as
itwasshown tohavelittle influence ontheresults |
[8]. |
|
Concerningchargedinterstitialsandvacancies,theen- |
|
|
ergylevelsaretakenfromtheliterature |
[ 5 ] , [8]andthe |
|
diffusivities are the same for charged |
or neutralspecies. |
|
As shown in Table I, afterascribingsomevaluesto |
I* , |
|
Dl, V*, and Dv,the overall number |
ofparameterstobe |
|
fitted is actually extremely reduced.
It is not really possibleto separate the values of binding energy and diffusivity of a pair. They arein fact two constraints associated with the binding energies: they should
begreaterthanthelowerboundsalreadyreported |
[29]. |
On the other hand, too large values mean that, even under equilibriumconditions,theconcentrationofpairsmight
exceed the substitutional dopant level, which is obviously not physical. Concerning now thebamer energy forpointdefectsrecombinationthroughreactions (l), (4),( 5 ) , it wasfoundthatbothinhighconcentrationpredeposition
and diffusion afterionimplantation,neglecting thisparameter leads to unphysical results during the simulations. For example,vacancyconcentrationscanbeextremely low(five or sixordersofmagnitude less than V h ) ,because the bulk recombination is too large. The same barrier energy value for reactions of type (l), (4), ( 5 ) gave good results. Table I1 gives the values of all of these pa-
rameters. AE,, hastobecomparedtothe |
results from |
|
theoretical(about1eVin |
[20]) or experimentalstudies |
|
(1.4 eV in [30]).
It is interesting to notice that, in the case of high-con- centrationpredeposition,whenthesamediffusivitiesare
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
|
652 |
|
|
TABLE I1 |
|
|
PARAMETERVALUESOF T H E MODEL |
|
Value |
Parameter |
Units |
|
|
__ |
|
0 . 5 |
eV |
|
1.51 |
eV |
|
1.52 |
eV |
IEEE ‘TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES. VOL. 39, NO. 3. MARCH 1992
approach may notbe really reliable to determine the value of basic parameters. This conclusion might contrast with
other studies aiming to extract these parameters, |
but the |
||
availableamount |
of experiments |
is atpresentnot |
suffi- |
cient to assess definitively any set |
of parameters, |
as pre- |
|
viously noted in |
[5]. |
|
|
1.53 |
eV |
1.51 |
eV |
I .52 |
eV |
1.53 |
eV |
IS O |
eV |
5.764 exp (F)cm2/s
0 . 5 exp (y>cm2/s
783.25 exp (F)cm-”/s
0.5 exp (T) cm2/s
0.5 exp (3)cm’/s
2.45 exp (7)-2.69 cm2/s
0.0677 exp (9)cm’/s
chosenforimpurityhnterstitialandimpurityivacancy
pairs, “normal” profiles are obtained: this is the casewith arsenic. However, if the diffusivity of impurity/interstitial pairsis greater,therelatedpairconcentrationsarealso greater, and then the forward reaction (4) will lower the vacancy level. The net result is a supersaturationof interstitialsandundersaturationofvacancies,andthewell-
known profiles with a kink and a tail [16]: this is the case
withphosphorus.Concerningboron,the |
tail alsodueto |
interstitialsupersaturation[28]isreproduced |
by this |
model. |
|
Once these parameters have been determined the way presented above, they remain fixed for all the test examplespresentedinthefollowingsections.Hence,allthe forthcoming comparisons with experiments are doneafter extracting the parameters,or in other words, usingalways the same parameter values. This isin fact the only way to validate such type of model, otherwise the large number
of involved parameters makes possible a fit to almost any type of experiments, when using different valuesfor each specific experiment. On the other hand, it does not mean that the set of parameters used here is the only one that is valid, since it is probably possible tofind other sets which aresuitable(especially, if thevalues of I* and 0,are. changed,theotherparameterscanbeextractedagain), provided that the values arenot unphysical. The presented comparisons with experiments are fromour point of view sufficient to validate the model, however such modeling
111. PREDEPOSITIONCASE
A . Early Stages of Difision
For steady-statediffusionmodels,withoutpointde-
fects, the nowwidely used equations and parameters were obtained by comparison with high-temperature and long-
timediffusionexperiments |
[l], [SI. Thesame |
remark |
holds forthesimulation |
of OED experiments |
[6], [7]. |
However, it is not clearwhethersuchformulationsare |
||
still valid when we try to apply them to short-time diffusionconditions.Thispointisinvestigatedhere, on predeposition test examples,in the case of arsenic. The same conclusionscanbereachedalsowithotherdopants,but
it is better to present the results for arsenic, because no anomalous effect appears, such as tail or kink for boron or phosphorus.
Fig. 1 shows acomparisonbetweenthepresentformulation and a standard steady-state model without point defects [lJ , [24], [25], hereafter referred to as the “standard model.,” This latter is chosen because it is the most widelyspread andvalidated.Predeposition of arsenicis simulated at 900°C,for diffusion times ranging from 1 s to 1 h.This figureshowsthat thesame profiles areobtained after long-timediffusion, but during the early stages of diffusion, the junction depth issignificantly greater for thenonequilibriummodel.Fromthisandothersimilar calculations, it is deduced that the present model can produce the same results as astandardmodel for longtime diffusion.Suchfeaturehasnotbeenwell-acceptedup to now [31] and it is important to stressthis point because it contributes to the validity of the present model.
It is of major interest to focus now on the very-short- time profiles. For times ranging from 10 ms to 20 s, Fig. 2(a) and (b) displays the profiles for the standard nonandequilibrium models, respectively.For extremely short diffusion times, with the present model, the diffused profile is first concave,thenexponential,and finally, the wellknownGaussianprofileisretrieved.Althoughtheseunusual shapes are observed only for times shorter than1 s, theymayaffecttheresults fortimedurationswhichare nowadays inthe rangeof practical applications, in the case of RTA(thesamekindofbehaviorinalmostthesame
time range is observed for higher temperatures). Suchconcave profileshavebeenobtainedexperimen-
tally forgolddiffusioninsilicon,validating in thiscase the kick-out reaction [32]. Exponential behavior has been
alsoreportedforlow-temperature |
borondiffusionfrom |
|
MBE-grownlayers 1211. Hence,theobtained |
resultsin |
|
terms of diffusion profile shapes |
are not specially due to |
|
thenonequilibriumaspect-theyaredueprimaryto |
re- |
|
actions like (2), (3)-but we will show that this aspect is
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
BACCUS ef a / . : STUDY OF NONEQULLIBRIUM DIFFUSIONMODELING
ArsenlcPredeposltion 900OC
0 |
200 |
400 |
600 |
800 |
1000 |
OEPTH [i)
Flg. I . Arsenicdiffusion at 900°C. from a constantdoping source.
Sfandord Model
^.Ne* modcl
OEPTH tbl
(b)
Fig. 2. For the same conditions as Fig. 1, evolution of arsenic profiles from I O ms to 20 s, for (a) the standard model, (b) thenew model.
dominantduringtheearlystages of diffusion, so thata correct description of these profiles requires the nonequilibrium treatment. For that purpose, we can estimate the nonequilibriumimportance by calculatingtheratiosof leftand right-hand side quantities of some reactions, as explainedinFig.3(a)and (b), after 10 ms and 20 s of diffusion,respectively. For equilibriumconditions(here
653
After lOms of diffusion
loo 7
" 0 50 100 150200250
DEPTH (dl
(a)
After 20s of diffusion
O.' |
loo |
200 300 |
400 |
500 |
|
|
|
DEPTH |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
Fig. 3 . Evaluation of nonequilibriumratiosas |
a function of depthforthe |
||||
diffusion conditions from Figs. |
1 and 2. (a) After IO |
ms of diffusion. (b) |
|||
After 20 s of diffusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
after 20 s ofdiffusion),theseratiosequalnearly |
1. Ob- |
||||
viously, they cannot be strictly equal to 1, or no diffusion wouldtake place,sincesubstitutionaldopantscanmove only via these reactions. Fig. 3(a) indicates that the ratios are very large after 10 ms of diffusion. This can be easily explained by considering that predeposition is a real nonequilibrium processfor very short times, the impurity dose changingdrastically.Forlongertime,thedoseincrease becomesprogressivelynegligiblecomparedtothetotal
dose, and the system has enough time to reach some kind of equilibrium state. The calculated nonequilibrium ratios reflect these considerations. Another interesting aspect is thatthedifference in junctiondepthsbetweenthetwo models is found only for high dopant concentrations, al-
thoughtheshapes |
reportedin Fig.2(b)arealwaysob- |
||
tained.Thereason |
isgiven in Fig.3(a):dominantreac- |
||
tions. are @ and |
0.Thistype |
ofreactionsisalso |
|
responsibleforthekink |
inphosphorusdiffusedprofiles |
||
[161. It is known that the kink appears only for high-con-
centrationpredeposition.Hence,thesamekindofcon- |
|
centration-dependentphenomenonisobservedinthe |
|
present test example. |
|
Apartfromthesetheoreticalconsiderations,the |
ratios |
asthosepresentedinFig.3mightbeveryuseful, |
if we |
want to know the time duration of the nonequilibrium regime. Once the ratios indicate "equilibrium," the present
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
654 |
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 39, NO. 3, MARCH 1992 |
modelcould be switchedtosomeformulationdescribed
in [8]-[lO]. In the case of annealing after ion implantation (seeSectionIV),thesameprocedurecouldbeapplied,
when the transient diffusion time is over. Since the main drawback of the model is the large CPU time, this remark isveryinterestingfromapracticalpointofview.Con-
cerning the predeposition case, the domain of interest for nonequilibrium phenomena is limited to very short time, less than about 10-20 s, afterwards the more standard formulations can be used.
It is difficult to check directly the predictions reported in Fig. 2(a) and (b), because such short-time anneals can be performedonly by dopingfromdopedfilms.Inthis case,the“intrinsic”properties of diffusioninsilicon might be screened by theeffectsoftheupperlayer,
through stress or injection of point defects. This last point has been shown recently for polysilicon diffusion sources, depending on annealing conditions [33]. Nevertheless, in the following, we present some comparisons with experiments for predepositionor doping from various films. The validity for long-time conditionsis confirmed by the effect of phosphorus diffusion on boron buried layer.
B. Cdmparisons with Experiments
It is now relatively well-accepted that phosphorus diffusioninducesaninterstitialsupersaturation,whichcan
D I F F U S I O N FROM AsSG |
TEMPERATURE.1050 C |
-Simulation |
I d e f e o t i n j a o t i o n l |
|
Profiles: |
affect dopants in buried layers [34]. In the case of boron, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
enhanceddiffusion is observed.Thisoverallmechanism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
hasbeenqualitativelysimulated |
by severalauthors[9], |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
[35].However, |
nodirectcomparisonwithexperiments |
|
1000500 0 |
|
|
E0001500 |
||||||
has beer, reported. On the other hand, three-dimensional |
|
~ |
||||||||||
experimentshavebeendesignedrecentlytostudypre- |
|
|
|
D e p t h ( a n g s t r o m s ) |
|
|||||||
|
|
Fig. 5 . Simulation of arsenicdiffusionfrom AsSG film, by RTA at 1050°C |
||||||||||
cisely these effects [36].. The present model was used to |
|
|||||||||||
simulate it and, |
moreover, |
to check the capability veryfor- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
long-timediffusion(here |
16 h at850°C).Fig. |
4 shows |
usingRTAfortemperaturesrangingfrom950°Cto |
|
||||||||
the phosphorus and boron profiles after 5 and 16 h of dif- |
1050°C. Arsenicconcentrationintheoxidewasonthe |
|||||||||||
fusion (a 100-pm-deep mesh was used). The initial boron |
order of 8 X lo2’at/cm3. A typical result is presented in |
|||||||||||
distribution is alsoreported.Itcanbeclearlyseen |
|
that |
Fig. 5, in which arsenic concentrations at the interface are |
|||||||||
phosphorus diffusion with the well-known kink and tail, |
|
not shown since they are not really significant (the oxide |
||||||||||
as well as boron-enhanced diffusion are well reproduced. |
layerwasetchedpriortoperforming |
|
SIMS). Usingthe |
|||||||||
It should be noted thatvery few boron diffusion |
takes |
placedefault parameters for arsenic defined previously, the ex- |
||||||||||
if phosphorusisnotpresent |
on thesurface.Inthiskind |
|
perimentalresultsarenotreproducedandtheerror |
on |
||||||||
of simulation, one of the most important factoris the sur- |
junction depth is very large. This could |
be explained by |
||||||||||
facephosphorusconcentration.Effectively,thismaxi- |
|
|
two mechanisms: 1) the very high arsenic concentrations |
|||||||||
mum concentration controls the amount of interstitial |
su- |
at the interface and some segregation effect. This would |
||||||||||
persaturation(mainly |
via thekineticreactions |
(4), |
(5)) , |
increasethedoseinsiliconbuttheexperimentalshapes |
||||||||
which in turn determines boron-enhanced diffusion.In our |
cannot be reproduced. 2 ) Effect of stress in the oxide on |
|||||||||||
case, the surface concentration was deduced from the ex- |
the silicon substrate. This point was checked and no suf- |
|||||||||||
perimentalprofiles.Thisprocedurewassufficienttoob- |
|
ficientstress |
was determined. Hence, |
we propose here a |
||||||||
tain the good agreement as shown |
in this figure. |
|
|
|
third possibility: the diffused profiles suggest a very high |
|||||||
In order to produce extremely shallow junctions, dop- |
diffusivityduetosupersaturation |
of pointdefects.This |
||||||||||
ing fromvariousfilmsisexpectedtoplayanincreasing |
|
|
wouldresult |
in theexponential-likeprofiles.Hence,the |
||||||||
role [ 2 ] . The filmscan |
beeitherpolysilicon,silicide, |
or |
only possibility to simulate precisely the experimental re- |
|||||||||
dopedoxide.Thelatterpossibilitymightbeusefulfor |
|
|
|
sults for all diffusion rimes, was to suppose a high defect |
||||||||
futureDRAMtechnologies.Withinthisframe,doping |
|
|
|
injectionfromtheinterfaceduringthevery |
first step of |
|||||||
from arsenic-silicate glass (AsSG) films has been studied. |
annealing (about 0.5 s). This explains the huge diffusivity |
|||||||||||
0.26 pm of AsSG was deposited at 675°C and annealed |
|
observedforthe 1-s profile,andalsothealmostnormal |
||||||||||
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
BACCUS er ol : STUDY OF NONEQUILIBRIUM DIFFUSION MODELING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
||||||||||
diffusion from 5 s to 1 min. Such procedures were applied |
lOI4 at/cm2 at 60 keV)atfour |
differenttemperatures: |
|||||||||||||||||
successfullyforothertemperatures.Theexactmecha- |
|
8OO"C, 9OO0C, 95OoC,and 1000°C. One of the key pa- |
|||||||||||||||||
nisms by whichpointdefects |
areinjected |
insiliconare |
rametersforsuchsimulations |
isthedescriptionofthe |
|
||||||||||||||
not clear atpresent,butcouldbeexplained |
by the very |
damage induced by ion implantation, which is taken into |
|||||||||||||||||
highconcentration of arsenic in theoxide,which might |
account by |
assuminghighconcentrationsofinterstitials |
|
||||||||||||||||
drag in silicon a significant amount of silicon atoms. This |
and vacancies. As these vacancies and interstitial profiles |
||||||||||||||||||
example is typical of the type of problems |
that will have |
were found to be almost identical [40], we use always the |
|||||||||||||||||
to be modeled in the near future. |
|
|
|
|
sameinitialdistributions |
|
forthesetwospecies.More- |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
over, the amountof damage is assumed to be directlypro- |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
portional to the dose. These distributions can now be de- |
|||||||||
IV. ANOMALOUSDIFFUSIONAFTERION IMPLANTATION |
|
|
|
Ontheonehand, |
they canbe |
||||||||||||||
Investigating anomalous diffusion arising after ion im- |
terminedintwoways. |
||||||||||||||||||
obtainedfromMonteCarlosimulations(MC),andspe- |
|
||||||||||||||||||
plantation is the most interesting application of the pres- |
|
||||||||||||||||||
cially,Hoblerprovidedone-andtwo-dimensionaltabu- |
|
||||||||||||||||||
entmodelbecausethisis |
by natureacompletenonequi- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
lations for the usual dopants [40]. Note that in these tab- |
|||||||||||||||||||
librium phenomenon. As reported in the Introduction, by |
|||||||||||||||||||
ulations,self-annealingduringionimplantationwasnot |
|
||||||||||||||||||
usingnonequilibriummodeling,boron-transient-en- |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
takenintoaccount,thus |
thecalculatedvaluesareover- |
|
||||||||||||||
hanceddiffusion |
at950°Cwasqualitatively |
reproduced |
|
||||||||||||||||
estimated. On the other hand, a first-order modeling is to |
|||||||||||||||||||
[171, and |
the temperature dependence thisof |
transient |
time |
||||||||||||||||
suppose that the concentrations of interstitials and vacan- |
|||||||||||||||||||
wasalsodeterminedforboronat1050°Cand1150°C |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
cies can be obtained by simply multiplying the implanted |
|||||||||||||||||
[181. Concerninglow-temperature,arseniciphosphorus |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
dopant profile. Since these initial defect distributions |
are |
|||||||||||||||||
junctions have been studiedwith a local equilibrium model |
|||||||||||||||||||
at present not well determined (moreover, they might de- |
|||||||||||||||||||
[37]. General agreement could bc obtained, although this |
|||||||||||||||||||
pend on the exact ion-implantation conditions, such as the |
|||||||||||||||||||
approach is not strictly valid because some basic assump- |
|||||||||||||||||||
current) we have |
usedbothmethodstostudytheirinflu- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
tions are notverified,such |
as equilibrium. In thisstudy |
|
|||||||||||||||||
enceonthe |
finaldopantprofile.Concerningthespecies |
|
|||||||||||||||||
[37], only one temperature was investigated |
(900°C). On |
|
|||||||||||||||||
includingboron, |
it hasbeenfoundexperimentallythat |
|
|||||||||||||||||
the other hand, empirical modeling has been successfully |
|
||||||||||||||||||
after ion implantation boron is mainly located on intersti- |
|||||||||||||||||||
reported in the past few years [38], in which thediffusion |
|||||||||||||||||||
tialsites [41], |
so that (BZ)speciesdeterminestheinitial |
||||||||||||||||||
coefficientstake |
intoaccountthedamage |
by |
assuming |
||||||||||||||||
dopantprofile. |
The resultingevolutionduringannealing |
|
|||||||||||||||||
transientmultiplyingfactors.This |
is analternativesolu- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
is almost the same as reported |
in [ 171: a progressive de- |
||||||||||||||||||
tiontotheusualdiffusionmodelsbecauseitisveryat- |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
crease ofI and V by diffusion and interactionswith dopant |
||||||||||||||||||
tractive from the viewpoint of CPU time. However, |
it is |
||||||||||||||||||
species-B |
and @I)-and |
exchange in the relative levels |
|||||||||||||||||
not based on physical principles and the extension to two |
|||||||||||||||||||
of B and ( B I ) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
dimensions is notstraightforward. |
In any case, such em- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Simulations have been carried outin the following three |
|||||||||||||||||||
piricalsolutionhighlightsthecomplexity |
of |
simulating |
|||||||||||||||||
cases for the initial defect distribution: 1) |
4 times the im- |
||||||||||||||||||
directly these phenomena. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
planted dopant profile, |
2) 20 times the dopant profile, |
3) |
||||||||||||
In the following, it is shown that the present model can |
|||||||||||||||||||
deduced from MC simulations [40]. In case 3), the max- |
|||||||||||||||||||
explaintheanomalousdiffusionintherange |
of 800°C- |
||||||||||||||||||
imum value of |
I and Vis about 200 times the maximum |
||||||||||||||||||
1050"C, and the advantage of RTA over furnace anneal- |
|||||||||||||||||||
dopant concentration. As a function of temperature, Fig. |
|||||||||||||||||||
ingin |
limitingtheamount |
ofdisplacementisverified. |
|||||||||||||||||
6 shows the evolution of saturation time which is defined |
|||||||||||||||||||
Moreover, the influence on diffusion of the choice of ini- |
|||||||||||||||||||
asfollows: |
it isconsideredthatanomalousdiffusionis |
|
|||||||||||||||||
tial point-defectsdistributionisdiscussed. |
Thesesimu- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
achieved once the amount of diffusion is compatible with |
|||||||||||||||||||
lationsare |
firstpresentedforthecaseof |
boron(from |
|||||||||||||||||
the predictions of usual steady-state models without point |
|||||||||||||||||||
Michel |
[3]), andforthecaseof |
coupled |
anenidboron |
||||||||||||||||
defects [l], [24]. It shouldbenotedthatresultsforcase |
|
||||||||||||||||||
diffusion in a 0.5-pm Bi-CMOS process (from Norishima |
|
||||||||||||||||||
2 lie between the ones for case1 and 3, and are not shown |
|||||||||||||||||||
[4], [39]). Finally, basic electrical characteristics are sim- |
|||||||||||||||||||
ulated for a bipolar n-p-n transistor and two-dimensional |
hereforclarity.The |
|
firstremarkisthataremarkable |
|
|||||||||||||||
agreement is found between experiments and simulation. |
|||||||||||||||||||
effects are presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
To our knowledge, it is the first time that such agreement |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
A . Boron Diffusion: Michel |
's Experiments |
|
|
|
is obtained overa wide range of temperature: from800°C |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
to lOOO"C, where the saturation time evolves from around |
||||||||||||||||
Theanomalousdiffusionofboronafterlow-doseion |
|
5 s to 30-40 min. The second conclusionis that the choice |
|||||||||||||||||
implantation was studied as a function of annealing tem- |
of initial defect distribution |
does not change significantly |
|||||||||||||||||
perature by Michel [ 31. Thedurationtime |
oftransient- |
the saturation time. This means that the activation energy |
|||||||||||||||||
enhanced diffusion (or saturation time) was found tohave |
andamount |
ofsaturationtimereflectthebasicinterac- |
|
||||||||||||||||
an activation energy of more than 4.5 eV. This activation |
tions between dopants and point defects, and depends on |
||||||||||||||||||
energy is |
significantly greater than the ones for |
impurity |
some combining factors such as the diffusivity of defects, |
||||||||||||||||
diffusion in silicon, thus |
it cannot be explained only |
by a |
binding energies, and strength of the kinetic reactions. |
|
|||||||||||||||
large diffusivity |
of boronhnterstitial pairs. We have sim- |
Fig. 7 represents the amount of boron displacement at |
|||||||||||||||||
ulatedtheprocessesreported |
in [3] (boronimplant |
2 X |
the end of the anomalous diffusion time, |
as a function of |
|||||||||||||||
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
656 |
|
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, |
VOL. 39. NO. 3 . MARCH 1992 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
temperaturerange. |
In |
fact,ourcalculationsdid |
notin- |
||||||
|
|
|
clude the |
formation of |
some clustersor precipitates, which |
|||||||
|
|
|
are not present at |
1000°C but are obvious at 800°C [3]. |
||||||||
|
|
|
It would reduce the amount |
of displacement by reducing |
||||||||
|
|
|
theamount |
of mobileboronspecies.Thisphenomenon |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
has been treated recently by Cowern using an equilibrium |
|||||||||
|
|
|
model,and |
itcan |
be introducedinacompatible |
wayin |
||||||
|
|
|
the present model. Reaction between m substitutional bo- |
|||||||||
|
|
|
ron atomsand n interstitialsmightform"Intermediate |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Defect Configurations"[42] |
* IDC. |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
mB + nl |
(27) |
|||||
|
|
|
In ordertoextendthepredictioncapabilities |
of |
our |
|||||||
|
|
|
model,this |
kind offormulation |
will beimplemented |
in |
||||||
|
|
|
the near future in our simulations. |
|
|
|||||||
|
IOOO/T I'KJ |
3. Application to n-p-n Bipolar structures |
|
|
||||||||
Fig. 6. Evolution of saturationtime |
as a function of temperature in the |
|
|
|||||||||
case of boron diffusion after low-dose ion implantatlon. Measurements are |
Theformationof |
n-p-nbipolartransistorsundervar- |
|
|||||||||
from [3]. The initial defects distributions are: case 1 , 4 times the implanted |
ious conditions has been studied and has demonstrated in |
|||||||||||
boron profile; case 2.20 times the boron Implanted profile:case 3, deduced |
||||||||||||
fromMonte Carlo calculations. |
|
a very clear manner the importance of damage introduced |
||||||||||
|
|
|
by ion implantation [4], [39]. Arsenic was implanted at a |
|||||||||
|
|
|
dose and energy of 5 X IO" |
at/cm2 and 40 keV, respec- |
||||||||
|
|
|
tively. Boron was implanted at a dose and energy of 4 X |
|||||||||
|
|
|
lOI 3 at/cm2 and 20 keV, respectively. In some cases, ar- |
|||||||||
|
|
|
senic was not included in order to separate the effects due |
|||||||||
|
|
|
to each species (this is also almost equivalent to assume |
|||||||||
|
|
|
that arsenic would be diffused from polysilicon). Furnace |
|||||||||
|
|
|
annealingwasperformedat |
800"C, 850°C, and 900°C |
||||||||
500 |
|
|
for 30min. RTA was also used for 15 s, at temperatures |
|||||||||
200 |
|
|
ranging from 850°C to 1050°C. From thesimulation point |
|||||||||
|
|
of view, the exact thermal conditions were taken into ac- |
||||||||||
100L |
I |
I |
count(includingramp-up),andtheimplantedprofiles |
|
|
|||||||
08 |
0.9 |
wereadjustedto |
SIMS measurements,whenneeded. |
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
IOOO/T PKI |
Comparisons between the present model and the standard |
||||||||||
Fig. 7. Boron displacement as a function of temperature for the same con- |
||||||||||||
one-with |
the meaning described |
in Section 111-A-were |
||||||||||
|
ditionsas |
Fig. 6 . |
||||||||||
|
also performed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
temperature. This boron displacement refers to thediffer- |
Fig. 8 summarizes the resultsas a function of annealing |
|||||||||||
temperaturefor:a)theborondisplacementatthebase/ |
|
|||||||||||
ence in boron profiles before and after diffusion, aatcon- |
collector junction in the case where arsenic is not intro- |
|
||||||||||
centration level of 1016at/cm3. Now, case 3 predicts too |
duced, b) |
theborondisplacementatthebaseicollector |
|
|
||||||||
much diffusion, as expected. The best results are obtainedjunction in the case of coupled arsenidboron diffusion, c)
when using the lowest initial distributions (case 1). Apart |
the base width, and d) the enlitterjunction depth. We con- |
||||
fromtheuncertaintyabouttheinitialdefectprofiles,a |
sider first the case of boron-only diffusion and the varia- |
||||
precisesimulationshouldtakeintoaccountthethermal |
tion in boron displacement. Again, two cases were stud- |
||||
history of the wafer, e.g., ramp-up conditions. However, |
ied: the initial I and V distributionsare 1 ) |
4 timesthe |
|||
in opposition to the results presentedin the following sec- |
implanted dopant profile, or 2 ) deduced from |
MC simu- |
|||
tion (IV-B), noinformationisavailable,and |
as aresult, |
lations [40]. Fig.8(a)showsthatthestandardmodel |
|||
more quantitative comparisons with the experiments can- |
underestimates the boron diffusion. On the other hand, it |
||||
not be expected. Nevertheless, it can be remarked that a |
wasfound that. whensimulatingpreciselythethermal |
||||
calculationneglectingion-implantationdamag?would |
conditions,usingthedefectsdistributionsfrom |
MC |
|||
predictonlysmalldisplacements:lessthan |
50 A for all |
slightly exaggerates boron diffusion, but good prediction |
|||
thermal conditions [3]. From our calculations, it was also |
capabilitiesareobserved.Thusfromthesimulationsof |
||||
deduced that the most |
important factor concerning the dis-boron diffusion [3], 141, 1391, it is concluded that reason- |
||||
placementisthemaximumlevelofdefectsand |
not the |
able results are obtained |
by decreasing the defect profile |
||
exact shapeof the initial profiles, because of the high dif- |
predicted by Hobler's calculations, with an amplitude de- |
||||
fusivities of I and V. Finally, it can be seen in Fig. 7 that |
termined from our empirical modelingof damage. |
||||
goodagreementcannot |
be obtainedoverthecomplete |
Thecaseofcoupled |
diffusion is morecomplex.For |
||
For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.
BACCUS pi a/.:STUDYMODELlKGOFDIFFUSIONNONbQlJlLIBRIUM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of RTA and justifies the use of high-temperature and short- |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
timeannealingtoobtainveryshallowjunctions.Thisis |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
associated with thepoint-defectremovalkineticssimu- |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c)Theseremarks |
holdalso |
forarsenic diffusion (Fig. |
||||||||
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8(d)).However,theanomalousdisplacementis |
|
not so |
||||||||
u |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
large as for boron, but still, it is always greater than pre- |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dicted by the standard model. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) Experimentally, a significant reduction in basewidth |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wasobservedbetweenthe1000°Cand |
|
|
|
1050°C RTA |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases, due to |
the arsenicdiffusion. This is also reproduced |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the simulations. It is interesting to notice that a similar |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
result was obtained when forming emitterby doping from |
||||||||||
ANNEALINGTEMPERATURE (%I |
|
|
|
polysilicon [4], [39]. This is duetotheevolution |
of the |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diffusivities D(As- v) and D,,,- ,) |
with temperature. |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e)Exactinclusionoframp-upconditionsisneeded, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise the types of behavior as |
a function of temper- |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ature cannot be reproduced, specially in the case of fur- |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
naceannealing(forexample,whenneglectingramp-up, |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more boron diffusion would be predicted at800°C than at |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900"C, contrary to the experimental results. Actually, the |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900°Cannealing |
|
firstincludesaramp-upstartingat |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800"C, thusthe |
anomalous diffusion is |
|
mainlydeter- |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mined by thedurationofthisramp-up,andnot |
|
by the |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900"C, 30-mindiffusion).It |
is |
wellknownexperimen- |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tally that ramp-up is very important to control dopant dif- |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fusion.This |
isexplainedhere |
|
by |
thepoint-defectski- |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
PC1 |
|
|
netic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEALINGTEMPERATURE |
|
|
f ) Finally, it is concluded that the usual standard model |
|||||||||||||||
Fig. 8 . Study of bipolar devices withRTA |
or furnaceannealing.The |
ex- |
fails completely to describe the experimental results. This |
|||||||||||||||
periments are from [4],[39]. (a) Boron displaccmcnt as a function of tem- |
isparticularlytrueforborondiffusionanditsimpacton |
|||||||||||||||||
perature(borononly case). Theinitial |
defects distributlonsare: case |
l.4 |
the base width, |
for furnace annealing. |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
times thc implanted boron profile; case |
2, deduced from Monte Carlo |
cal- |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
culations.For the resultsfromcoupledarseniclborondiffusion,theinitial |
|
These results are illustrated |
in another manner in Fig. |
|||||||||||||||
point-defectsdistribution is definedasthe |
rnaxlrnurn of the implanted ar- |
9(a) and (b), which represent the arsenicand boron-sim- |
||||||||||||||||
senic profile and o f 4 times the boron implanted profile. (b) Boron displace- |
||||||||||||||||||
ment as a function of temperature (coupled diffusion casc). ( c ) Base width |
ulated profiles afterthe 900°C furnace annealing,by using |
|||||||||||||||||
as a function of temperature. (d) Emitterjunctiondepth |
X,, as a function |
the standard and new model, respectively. In thefirst case |
||||||||||||||||
of temperaturc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Fig. 9(a)), the boron profile is almost unchanged |
by the |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diffusion step, |
but |
usingthenewmodelaremarkable |
|
|||||||
high-doseionimplantation, |
|
the |
siliconbecomesamor- |
|
agreementisobtained(Fig.9(b)).There |
isonlyaslight |
||||||||||||
|
|
difference forarsenicdiffusion.Fig. |
10 shows,forthis |
|||||||||||||||
phous and the modeling of damage |
used here may |
reach |
||||||||||||||||
900°C furnace diffusion case, the dopant |
profiles as well |
|||||||||||||||||
its limits. Possible extensions of this work |
to describe, in |
|||||||||||||||||
as the species involving defects. In additionto the Poisson |
||||||||||||||||||
a more precise manner, the physical mechanisms will be |
||||||||||||||||||
equation, 7 coupled equations are solved, and due to the |
||||||||||||||||||
discussedbrieflyintheConclusions.However,itisim- |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
portant to investigate the possibilities of the present work. assumptionofequilibriumbetweenchargedandneutral |
||||||||||||||||||
In any case, compared to the |
boron-only situation, |
as the |
species, 14 species are actually deduced from these types |
|||||||||||||||
of calculations. Only some of them are representedin Fig. |
||||||||||||||||||
amountofdamageisenhanced |
by thearsenicimplanta- |
|||||||||||||||||
10. This illustrates the complexityof the calculations and |
||||||||||||||||||
tion,muchmoreborondisplacementisobtained,as |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Our simula- |
the need for sophisticated models when aiming to repro- |
|||||||||||||||||
clearlyseenexperimentally(Fig.8(a),(b)). |
||||||||||||||||||
duce the experimental behavior |
in a consistent manner. |
|||||||||||||||||
tions revealed that a good description of the experimental |
||||||||||||||||||
In order to perform a comprehensive study, the electri- |
||||||||||||||||||
features can be reproduced by simply choosing the initial |
||||||||||||||||||
calbehaviorofthesedeviceswassimulated.Thetrian- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
I and V profiles to be equal to the implanted arsenic dis- |
|
|||||||||||||||||
gularmeshdevicesimulator |
TRIMEDES [43] wasused |
|||||||||||||||||
tribution. This condition was used for all the sirnularions |
||||||||||||||||||
in the way described in [44]: three one-dimensional sim- |
||||||||||||||||||
reported hereafter in the |
case of |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
coupled arsenic/boron dif- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
fusion.Fig.8(a)-(d)shows |
very interestingresults: |
|
|
ulationswereperformedfortheintrinsicbipolardevice |
||||||||||||||
|
|
(the results Dresented above). the linked base, and the ex- |
||||||||||||||||
a) Borondisplacement |
is |
greater whenusingfurnace |
||||||||||||||||
trinsic base regions. Since for this technology under study |
||||||||||||||||||
annealing, in comparison with RTA. |
|
|
|
|
the results are mainly determined by the profile in the in- |
|||||||||||||
b) This displacement is drastically reduced in the case |
trinsicregion, |
|
thisapproach |
issufficient |
|
(441. Thede- |
||||||||||||
