Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Перевод МММ / 3_%%%% 0648bacc A Study of Nonequilibrium Diffusion Modeling-

.pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.03.2015
Размер:
511.6 Кб
Скачать

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 39, NO. 3. MARCH 1992

A Study of Nonequilibrium Diffusion Modeling-

Applications to Rapid Thermal Annealing and

Advanced Bipolar Technologies

Bruno Baccus, Tetsunori Wada, Associate Member, IEEE, Naoyuki Shigyo, Senior Member, IEEE, Masayuki Norishima, Hiroomi Nakajima, Kazumi Inou, Toshihiko Iinuma,

and Hiroshi Iwai. Associate Member, IEEE

Abstract-A

new nonequilibrium diffusion model has been de-

to predict diffusion profiles. Earlier technologies could be

veloped aiming to study theinfluence of point

defectson dopant

simulated with steady-state diffusion models, which con-

redistribution, specially for transient

enhanced diffusion. The

sider macroscopic or phenomenological diffusivities [11.

coupled equations for point defects, substitutional impurities,

However, in order to obtain extremely shallow junctions

and impuritiedpoint defect pairs are solved under nonequilib-

riumcondition.

Charged

species are included and Poisson

needed in advanced MOS and bipolar technologies, strong

equation is solved. The characteristics and domain of validity

constraints arise for the thermal budget [2] and the influ-

of this model have been investigated. From the numerical point

ence of point defectsmust be explicitly included. Among

ofview,

it is found that a decoupled scheme solves efficiently

others, one of themost striking example is the anomalous

the system of equations, together with

an automatic time step

transientenhanceddiffusion

afterionimplantation[3].

selection. Moreover,indications are suggested to predict

the

conditions under which a steady-state model can be used. In

Suchbehaviorsaffectdrasticallyactualdeviceperfor-

 

thecase

of high-concentrationpredeposition,enhanced

dif-

mance [4]. This typical example demonstrates clearly the

fusion is observed and concave or exponential profiles are ob-

pointdefectsimportance,moreoverunderstrong

non-

tained for very short-time diffusion. These effects are amplified

equilibrium configuration. Generally speaking, the advent

by the nonequilibrium treatment. Applications are presented

of low thermal budget raises the question of the validity

for oxide diffusion sources,

in which insight is needed during

theearly

steps of diffusion. Moreover, the

generality of

the

of process models for these new conditions.

 

model is confirmed by long-time diffusion behavior and by the

From the modeling point of view, significant progress

influence of phosphorus diffusion on boron buried layer.

 

has been achieved in the last

few years about the under-

Anomalous effects observed during RTA steps after ion im-

standingofpointdefectsanddopantdiffusion[5].The

plantation are also well reproduced by the model, in terms of

duration of the transient diffusion and in terms of the amount

first simulation works including point defects focused on

of displacement, as a function of temperature. Successful com-

oxidation-enhanceddiffusionproblems

[6], [7]. Then,

parisons with experiments are reported for boron and for ac-

they were generalized, based on the concept of point de-

tual bipolar structures,with coupled arseniclboron diffusion in

fectimpuritypairs

[8]-[lo]. These latter models

rely on

a 0.5-pm Bi-CMOS process. Furnace and RTA are,also com-

physical principles and allow deep insight into the diffu-

pared forthese examples. The importanceof the initial amount

of point defects after ion implantation is discussed. Finally, the

sionmechanisms

[l I]. Equilibriumisassumedbetween

electrical influence of such problems is evaluated for a bipolar

point defects and impurities, and nonequilibrium is taken

technology. The effects of damage on two-dimensional diffusion

into account only for bulk recombination. These assump-

are alsoinvestigated.These

results have been obtained using

tions are valid as long as the concentrations of impurities

always the same values of the parameters, validating the gen-

are much greater than the species including interstitialsor

erality of the model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vacancies [ 121. Althoughthisistheusualcase,itis

no

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. INTRODUCTION

 

 

more verified during the early stages

of diffusion follow-

 

 

 

 

ing ion implantation, since not only interstitials o r vacan-

HECONTINUOUSdecrease

in devicedimensions

cies but also impurityipointdefectpairsexceedtheim-

Tinduces new demands on process simulation, in order

purityconcentration. A completenonequilibrium formu-

Manuscript received March 22, 1991;revised June 20, 1991, Thereview

lation is thus required in this kind of situation.

 

Nonequilibriumdiffusionmodelinghasbeen

first pro-

of this paper was arranged by Associate Editor N.Kawamura

 

posed by Hu [131, in order to explain the anomalous dif-

B. Baccus was with the ULSI Research Center, Toshiba Corporation, 1.

KomukaiToshiba-cho,Saiwai-ku,Kawasaki

210, Japan.Heis now with

fusion of phosphorus. However, the feasibility andpoten-

ISEN, 59046 Lille Cedex, France.

 

 

 

tiality of thistype

of modelinghavebeendemonstrated

T. Wada, N. Shigyo, H . Nakajima, K. Inou, T. Iinurna. and H. Iwai are

onlyrecently by MulvaneyandRichardson.Phosphorus

withthe

ULSI ResearchCenter,ToshibaCorporation.

I , Komukai To-

shiba-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki 210, Japan,

 

 

 

diffusion has been studied [14]-[ 161 and it has been shown

M.NorishimaiswiththeSemiconductorDeviceEngineeringLabora-

 

that transient diffusiondue toion-implantation damage can

tory, Toshiba Corporation, 1, Komukai Toshiba-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki

bealsoqualitativelyreproduced

[17]. A formulationin-

210, Japan.

 

 

 

 

 

IEEE Log Number 9105348.

 

 

 

 

cluding boron, interstitial, and

boron-interstitial

pair has

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

BACCUS P I n l . : STUDY OF NONEQUlLlBRlUM DIFFUSIONMODELING

649

been also reported for the study of boron diffusion during RTA (181, and coupling with the results of Monte Carlo ion-implantation calculations has been studied[191. However,thedevelopmentofsuchmodelsisstillinits first stages and numerous questions arise about complete nonequilibriumdiffusionmodeling.Theprecisecharacteris-

tics have not been studied indetail-especially

for tran-

sientphenomena-northedomain

of validityhasbeen

discussed. Finally, comparisons

with experiments are very

limited.

It is the goal of this paper to answer these questionsIn. particular,it will beshownthatwithinageneralframework, the same parameter values can describe a large variety of experimental results, thus establishing the coherence and validity of nonequilibrium modeling. In the case

ofhighconcentrationandshorttimediffusion,unusual

 

profiles areobtainedandarethedirectsignature

of mi-

grationviaintermediatespeciesThenonequilibrium.

 

treatment enhances this effect. and from these test examples,amethodissuggestedtodeterminetheconditions underwhichnonequilibriumdominates or not,thusallowing the subsequent use of a steady-state formulation, as in [8]-[lo], in ordertoreducethe CPU time. Applications are shown in the case of doping from doped oxide film.Moreover, by comparisonwithotherexperiments,

it is deduced that the amountof interstitials generated during phosphorus diffusion and its influence on boron buried layer can be quantitatively evaluated. The effects of ionimplantation damage on diffusion are also investigated and comparedwithexperimentsforboronandarsenic/boron coupleddiffusion inbipolardevices.The influenceof temperature, RTA versus furnace annealing, and arsenic- ion-implantation damage on boron diffusion are successfullyreproduced.Theimportanceofinitialdefectdistributionsisalsodiscussed.Finally,theimpactofsuch

modeling on bipolar transistor operation is presented and two-dimensional effects are reported.

11. THEMODEL

A. Generalities

The present understanding of impurity diffusion in siliconfavorsthepairingofsubstitutionalimpuritieswith

point defects (interstitials and vacancies). These pairs dif-

fuse until a recombinationbyvariouswaysappears

181,

[9], [111, [131. Suchmechanismsofdiffusion by

inter-

mediatespecieshavebeeninvestigatedveryrecently

by

theoreticalcalculations [20] and by some specialexperimental procedures [2 I]. These studies furnish significant support for the physical backgroundof the present model. For the sake of simplicity, its worthwhile to write briefly theequationsinasimplecaseandprogressivelypresent thevariousimprovementsandcharacteristics.Consider-

ing the diffusion of adopant A , theinvolvedkineticreactions can lie described as follows:

I + V = (0)

(1)

A + V 2 ( A V )

(2)

A + I

( A I )

(3)

( A I ) + V + A

(4)

(AV) + I

A

(5)

where I , V , ( A I ) , and ( A V ) represent interstitial, vacancy, dopant-interstitial,anddopant-vacancypairs,respec- tively.Reaction(1)isthebulkrecombination,reaction

(2) describesthevacancymechanism,reaction (3) is known as “kickout,” and reaction (4) describes the dissociative or Frank-Turnbull mechanism. The above mentionedstudy [21] supportsthe kick-outreactionandthe importanceoftheFrank-Turnbullmechanismwassug- gestedin [22] andconfirmed in the case of phosphorus diffusion[16].Ifwe consideronlyreactions (1)-(3) (including reactions (4) and (5) is straightforward), the system of equations reads

aI

a 2~

-at = Dl

- kbA * I + k,(AI) - k , ( W - I*V*)

aA

-at = -kf2A V + k,(AV) - kbA . I + k,(AI)

(10)

where DXrefers to the diffusivity of the species X , I* and V * to the interstitial and vacancy equilibrium concentrations, kfmand kfmto the forward and reverse rates of reaction numbered a.This set of equations is exactly the one presented in [14].

However, for practicalapplications, it isnecessary to incorporatechargedspecies. In [15]:[16]they areintroducedalsoundernonequilibriumconditionUnfortu.-

nately, this leads to an extremely large number of equa-

tions, so.

asproposedin

[18]-but

withadifferent

treatment-all

the charged species are considcred to be in

equilibriumwiththeneutralones.Thisisareasonable assumption since these clectric processes are much faster than reactions such as (1)-(S). This can be verified from

Shockley-Read-Halltheory

[IS].UsingBoltzmann

sta-

tistics,thenegativechargedvacancy

V - , forexample,

can be expressed as a function of the neutral vacancy

V o

where n is the electron concentration, n, the intrinsic elec-

being determined as5 cm/s, but this is not essential here). Withinthisframework,themodel not onlycontainsthe physical features of formulations as those in [8]-[lo], but alsoincludesthenonequilibriumconditionforeachre-
action between the different species.
where KSiand K,, are the interface recombination velocity forinterstitialsandvacancies,respectively(theirvalues
I -, I +,

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

m

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES. VOL. 39. NO. 3, MARCH 1992

tronconcentration, ei theintrinsicFermilevel,

eV- the

energylevelof V - , k Boltzmann'sconstant,and

T the

temperature in Kelvins. In the present model, the following charged point defects species are included:

V - , V = , V + + . Theelectronconcentrationiscalculated

by solving the Poisson equation, as it was shown to give somedifferencescompared to thechargeneutralityformulation, if we focuse on short diffusion times [23]. The set ofkineticreactions (1)-(5) isgeneralizedforeach charged species. For instance, we give here only four reactions, assuming that dopant A is a donor

A + + v- e (AV)O

(12)

A + + v= 6 (AV)-

(13)

(AV)O + I -

e A + + 2n

(14)

(AI)'

+ V -

e A' + 2n.

(15)

Itisthenpossibletorewrite

in ageneralmannerthe

systemofequations

(6)-(lo), takingintoaccountthe

 

charged species. For example, the continuity equation for ( A V )pairs becomes, when including the electricfield term

from reactions such as (14), (1 5 )

The same type of equation is written for each diffusing species,exceptfortheequationforsubstitutionaldopants,thatcontainsonlykineticterms.Forarsenicand phosphorus, five coupled equations are needed. However, as boron diffuses primary through interactions with interstitials ([5], [20]), only four equations are used for I , V , B , ( B I ) . It should be noted that even if ( B V ) pairs are not considered, vacancies must be introduced in the calcula-

tions,becausetheycanplayaroleviareactions

(1) or

(4). Finally,theboundaryconditionsareusualforthis

 

kind of modeling. At the surface, we have

 

a(Av)O

 

a(Av)-

 

--

-

at

+- at

 

dr

 

av

 

 

 

 

DV - = K,,(V- V * )

 

 

 

 

ax

where *is the electrostatic potential. The last term in the right-handsidecontainskineticstermslikethosede-

scribed by reactions (1)-(5), or (12)-(15). Ontheother hand, the charged point defecthmpurity pairs are also expressed as a function of the neutral ones. For this purpose,

if we assume equilibrium for the two reactions

(12) and

B. Numerical Aspects

 

(13), we obtain

 

IC(:(AV)'

 

 

 

 

The resulting equations and algorithms have been im-

 

 

 

 

('4v)-

= kr12kfi3- (?)(AV)'

=

(17)

plemented in the two-dimensional multilayer process sim-

kr1,kfiz 6'=- ni

 

 

ulator IMPACT4 1241, using the Finite Element Method.

where 6'

depends on the energy level of V = . Substituting

Wereporthereonlythespecialproblemsrelatedtothe

presentmodel,sincetheotheralgorithmshavebeenal-

(17) into (16), we get

 

 

 

 

ready discussed [24], [25].

 

[I +I)K:(

 

 

 

 

As we will focus on the influence of defects on the ac-

 

 

 

 

tiveregion of devices, the same precision

in defectand

 

 

 

 

dopant profiles descriptions must be achieved. Hence, the

 

 

 

 

 

 

same mesh is used for all the involved species. More se-

 

 

 

 

 

 

vere constraints must

be satisfied for time discretization.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The implicit scheme has been used, together with an au-

 

 

 

 

 

 

tomatic time step selection in the same way as proposed

 

 

 

 

 

 

in [lo]. Inthecase

of RTAafter ionimplantation(see

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section IV), the time step ranges typically from 0.1 ps at

Two interesting consequences follow: we obtain an ef-

the beginning of the diffusion, where nonequilibrium ki-

neticreactionsdominate,toseveralseconds

or several

fectivediffusivitywhichdependsonelectronconcentra-

minutes, once the equilibrium state is established.

tion, which is usually the case[SI, [8]. Secondly, the term

One very important feature of the model is that it con-

including the variationof electron concentration with time

tains kinetic terms which are several orders of magnitude

can be expressed as a function of kinetic terms, coming

above the usualdiffusiveterms.This is specially true in

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

MODELINGNONEQUILIBRIUMDIFFUSIONBACCUSOF er a / . : STUDY

65 I

the case of high concentrations,for interstitial or vacancy recombinationviareactionslike (l), (4)-(5). As these

terms are directly proportional to the concentrations (see

ProcedureiSource

(6)-(lo)), very high precision must be achieved. For this purpose, the stopping criterion for the Newton-Raphson loopswasdefinedasarelativechangeinconcentrations nogreaterthan 5 X These Newton-Raphsoniter- ations include the Poisson equation and continuity equations for the species. On the other hand,inorder to ensure numericalstability,themass-lumpingtechniqucisused

for both temporal and kinetic terms. Finally,coupledanddecoupledschemeshavebeen

compared. It was found that the same results are obtained with both methods, whatever the type of conditions (predeposition,diffusionafterionimplantation,etc.).Concerningthe matrix solvers,thedecoupledschemeuses ILDU-CG [24] andthecoupledoneuses ablock-BCG method [26]. The comparison of CPU times for these two schemes depends heavily on the choice of parameters. If a high and unphysicalvalue of bulk recombination is used [14], [15], thecoupledscheme is significantlyfaster. However, when using the complete model, inwhich the recombinationofinterstitialsandvacanciesdependson

dopant concentrations and is distributed among several reactions,theCPUtimebecomescomparable.Theseare remarkable and very interesting results. Moreover, a bo-

ronlarsenicsimulationrequiressevencoupledequations

( I , V, ( A s l ) ,( A s V ) ,As, (BZ), ) . Thus prohibitive memory resources would be needed for a coupled resolution. This leads to the conclusionthat the decoupled method is the most practical. From the CPU time point of view, depending on conditions,afactorbetween 100 and 500 is obtained,comparedtostandardsteady-statemodel

without point defects [24].

C. Parameter Values

One of thecharacteristics of suchmodelsisthatthey contain a large number of parameters, thusit is extremely important to describe the procedure for their extraction. Moreover,fromageneralpointofvicw,itisofmajor interesttodiscussthe way tovalidatetheobtainedformulation.

Consideringfirstthebulkrecombination(generalized

for charged species, but expressed here only for the neutral ones), the associated term is expressed as

k , = 4uR(D, + Dv)exp (~ y ) (24) where A E,, is the bamer energy for recombination andR

the capture radius.

Whendefined in this way.bulk recom-

binationhastheusual

andvery

low value,and not the

unphysicalvalueusedifreactions

(4)and ( 5 ) arene-

glected [14], [15]. In a general manner, the kinetic rates depend on the diffusivity ofthe species and on somebindingenergy.Forexample,theforwardandreverseterms

of reaction (12) are given by

kf = 4rRDv-

(25)

TABLE I

PROCEDURE FOR PARAMETERSVALUES DETEKMlNATlON

Parameter

 

 

 

 

R

Mathiot-afterPfister

 

[SI

 

I*, D ,

Bronnerafter

[27]

 

 

v*, Dv

thermodynamicfrom

 

1151

 

Ebwv,, Ebv,,,

frompredepositlon

calculationskomparisons with

DAv, 0 4 1

standardsteady-state

modelsor

experiments [281

A E,,

highfrom-concentrationpredeposition

and

 

diffusion after ion implantation

 

where nh is the number of lattice sites andEb(Av,~the binding energy of(AV)’ pair. For more complex reactions such as(14), (15), theforwardterm isexpressedinthesame way as (25), but during the course of this study, we found

necessary to introduce also a barrier energy for

this type

of reaction, asfor direct I-V recombination. It

is

sufficient

to assume the same value of bamer energy for all con-

cernedreactions,thusitisalsospecifiedas

AE,”. The

reversetermsofreactions (14), (15) are obtained by assuming equilibrium for the reactions[161. Hence they depend also on I* and V * .

The procedure to determine the parameter values is ex-

plained inTable

I. Inorderto limitthe number ofun-

knowns, we make

first several assumptions. The capture

radius R is chosen to be the same for all the reactions, as

itwasshown tohavelittle influence ontheresults

[8].

Concerningchargedinterstitialsandvacancies,theen-

 

ergylevelsaretakenfromtheliterature

[ 5 ] , [8]andthe

diffusivities are the same for charged

or neutralspecies.

As shown in Table I, afterascribingsomevaluesto

I* ,

Dl, V*, and Dv,the overall number

ofparameterstobe

fitted is actually extremely reduced.

It is not really possibleto separate the values of binding energy and diffusivity of a pair. They arein fact two constraints associated with the binding energies: they should

begreaterthanthelowerboundsalreadyreported

[29].

On the other hand, too large values mean that, even under equilibriumconditions,theconcentrationofpairsmight

exceed the substitutional dopant level, which is obviously not physical. Concerning now thebamer energy forpointdefectsrecombinationthroughreactions (l), (4),( 5 ) , it wasfoundthatbothinhighconcentrationpredeposition

and diffusion afterionimplantation,neglecting thisparameter leads to unphysical results during the simulations. For example,vacancyconcentrationscanbeextremely low(five or sixordersofmagnitude less than V h ) ,because the bulk recombination is too large. The same barrier energy value for reactions of type (l), (4), ( 5 ) gave good results. Table I1 gives the values of all of these pa-

rameters. AE,, hastobecomparedtothe

results from

theoretical(about1eVin

[20]) or experimentalstudies

(1.4 eV in [30]).

It is interesting to notice that, in the case of high-con- centrationpredeposition,whenthesamediffusivitiesare

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

 

652

 

 

TABLE I1

 

 

PARAMETERVALUESOF T H E MODEL

 

Value

Parameter

Units

 

 

__

 

0 . 5

eV

 

1.51

eV

 

1.52

eV

IEEE ‘TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES. VOL. 39, NO. 3. MARCH 1992

approach may notbe really reliable to determine the value of basic parameters. This conclusion might contrast with

other studies aiming to extract these parameters,

but the

availableamount

of experiments

is atpresentnot

suffi-

cient to assess definitively any set

of parameters,

as pre-

viously noted in

[5].

 

 

1.53

eV

1.51

eV

I .52

eV

1.53

eV

IS O

eV

5.764 exp (F)cm2/s

0 . 5 exp (y>cm2/s

783.25 exp (F)cm-”/s

0.5 exp (T) cm2/s

0.5 exp (3)cm’/s

2.45 exp (7)-2.69 cm2/s

0.0677 exp (9)cm’/s

chosenforimpurityhnterstitialandimpurityivacancy

pairs, “normal” profiles are obtained: this is the casewith arsenic. However, if the diffusivity of impurity/interstitial pairsis greater,therelatedpairconcentrationsarealso greater, and then the forward reaction (4) will lower the vacancy level. The net result is a supersaturationof interstitialsandundersaturationofvacancies,andthewell-

known profiles with a kink and a tail [16]: this is the case

withphosphorus.Concerningboron,the

tail alsodueto

interstitialsupersaturation[28]isreproduced

by this

model.

 

Once these parameters have been determined the way presented above, they remain fixed for all the test examplespresentedinthefollowingsections.Hence,allthe forthcoming comparisons with experiments are doneafter extracting the parameters,or in other words, usingalways the same parameter values. This isin fact the only way to validate such type of model, otherwise the large number

of involved parameters makes possible a fit to almost any type of experiments, when using different valuesfor each specific experiment. On the other hand, it does not mean that the set of parameters used here is the only one that is valid, since it is probably possible tofind other sets which aresuitable(especially, if thevalues of I* and 0,are. changed,theotherparameterscanbeextractedagain), provided that the values arenot unphysical. The presented comparisons with experiments are fromour point of view sufficient to validate the model, however such modeling

111. PREDEPOSITIONCASE

A . Early Stages of Difision

For steady-statediffusionmodels,withoutpointde-

fects, the nowwidely used equations and parameters were obtained by comparison with high-temperature and long-

timediffusionexperiments

[l], [SI. Thesame

remark

holds forthesimulation

of OED experiments

[6], [7].

However, it is not clearwhethersuchformulationsare

still valid when we try to apply them to short-time diffusionconditions.Thispointisinvestigatedhere, on predeposition test examples,in the case of arsenic. The same conclusionscanbereachedalsowithotherdopants,but

it is better to present the results for arsenic, because no anomalous effect appears, such as tail or kink for boron or phosphorus.

Fig. 1 shows acomparisonbetweenthepresentformulation and a standard steady-state model without point defects [lJ , [24], [25], hereafter referred to as the “standard model.,” This latter is chosen because it is the most widelyspread andvalidated.Predeposition of arsenicis simulated at 900°C,for diffusion times ranging from 1 s to 1 h.This figureshowsthat thesame profiles areobtained after long-timediffusion, but during the early stages of diffusion, the junction depth issignificantly greater for thenonequilibriummodel.Fromthisandothersimilar calculations, it is deduced that the present model can produce the same results as astandardmodel for longtime diffusion.Suchfeaturehasnotbeenwell-acceptedup to now [31] and it is important to stressthis point because it contributes to the validity of the present model.

It is of major interest to focus now on the very-short- time profiles. For times ranging from 10 ms to 20 s, Fig. 2(a) and (b) displays the profiles for the standard nonandequilibrium models, respectively.For extremely short diffusion times, with the present model, the diffused profile is first concave,thenexponential,and finally, the wellknownGaussianprofileisretrieved.Althoughtheseunusual shapes are observed only for times shorter than1 s, theymayaffecttheresults fortimedurationswhichare nowadays inthe rangeof practical applications, in the case of RTA(thesamekindofbehaviorinalmostthesame

time range is observed for higher temperatures). Suchconcave profileshavebeenobtainedexperimen-

tally forgolddiffusioninsilicon,validating in thiscase the kick-out reaction [32]. Exponential behavior has been

alsoreportedforlow-temperature

borondiffusionfrom

MBE-grownlayers 1211. Hence,theobtained

resultsin

terms of diffusion profile shapes

are not specially due to

thenonequilibriumaspect-theyaredueprimaryto

re-

actions like (2), (3)-but we will show that this aspect is

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

BACCUS ef a / . : STUDY OF NONEQULLIBRIUM DIFFUSIONMODELING

ArsenlcPredeposltion 900OC

0

200

400

600

800

1000

OEPTH [i)

Flg. I . Arsenicdiffusion at 900°C. from a constantdoping source.

Sfandord Model

^.Ne* modcl

OEPTH tbl

(b)

Fig. 2. For the same conditions as Fig. 1, evolution of arsenic profiles from I O ms to 20 s, for (a) the standard model, (b) thenew model.

dominantduringtheearlystages of diffusion, so thata correct description of these profiles requires the nonequilibrium treatment. For that purpose, we can estimate the nonequilibriumimportance by calculatingtheratiosof leftand right-hand side quantities of some reactions, as explainedinFig.3(a)and (b), after 10 ms and 20 s of diffusion,respectively. For equilibriumconditions(here

653

After lOms of diffusion

loo 7

" 0 50 100 150200250

DEPTH (dl

(a)

After 20s of diffusion

O.'

loo

200 300

400

500

 

 

 

DEPTH

 

 

 

 

 

(b)

 

 

 

Fig. 3 . Evaluation of nonequilibriumratiosas

a function of depthforthe

diffusion conditions from Figs.

1 and 2. (a) After IO

ms of diffusion. (b)

After 20 s of diffusion.

 

 

 

 

 

after 20 s ofdiffusion),theseratiosequalnearly

1. Ob-

viously, they cannot be strictly equal to 1, or no diffusion wouldtake place,sincesubstitutionaldopantscanmove only via these reactions. Fig. 3(a) indicates that the ratios are very large after 10 ms of diffusion. This can be easily explained by considering that predeposition is a real nonequilibrium processfor very short times, the impurity dose changingdrastically.Forlongertime,thedoseincrease becomesprogressivelynegligiblecomparedtothetotal

dose, and the system has enough time to reach some kind of equilibrium state. The calculated nonequilibrium ratios reflect these considerations. Another interesting aspect is thatthedifference in junctiondepthsbetweenthetwo models is found only for high dopant concentrations, al-

thoughtheshapes

reportedin Fig.2(b)arealwaysob-

tained.Thereason

isgiven in Fig.3(a):dominantreac-

tions. are @ and

0.Thistype

ofreactionsisalso

responsibleforthekink

inphosphorusdiffusedprofiles

[161. It is known that the kink appears only for high-con-

centrationpredeposition.Hence,thesamekindofcon-

 

centration-dependentphenomenonisobservedinthe

 

present test example.

 

Apartfromthesetheoreticalconsiderations,the

ratios

asthosepresentedinFig.3mightbeveryuseful,

if we

want to know the time duration of the nonequilibrium regime. Once the ratios indicate "equilibrium," the present

DEPTH imlcron)
Fig. 4. Comparison betfieen experiments(spreadingresistance) and simulation for diffusion from PSG film and influence on a boron buried layer. Experiments are from 1361.

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

654

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 39, NO. 3, MARCH 1992

modelcould be switchedtosomeformulationdescribed

in [8]-[lO]. In the case of annealing after ion implantation (seeSectionIV),thesameprocedurecouldbeapplied,

when the transient diffusion time is over. Since the main drawback of the model is the large CPU time, this remark isveryinterestingfromapracticalpointofview.Con-

cerning the predeposition case, the domain of interest for nonequilibrium phenomena is limited to very short time, less than about 10-20 s, afterwards the more standard formulations can be used.

It is difficult to check directly the predictions reported in Fig. 2(a) and (b), because such short-time anneals can be performedonly by dopingfromdopedfilms.Inthis case,the“intrinsic”properties of diffusioninsilicon might be screened by theeffectsoftheupperlayer,

through stress or injection of point defects. This last point has been shown recently for polysilicon diffusion sources, depending on annealing conditions [33]. Nevertheless, in the following, we present some comparisons with experiments for predepositionor doping from various films. The validity for long-time conditionsis confirmed by the effect of phosphorus diffusion on boron buried layer.

B. Cdmparisons with Experiments

It is now relatively well-accepted that phosphorus diffusioninducesaninterstitialsupersaturation,whichcan

D I F F U S I O N FROM AsSG

TEMPERATURE.1050 C

-Simulation

I d e f e o t i n j a o t i o n l

 

Profiles:

affect dopants in buried layers [34]. In the case of boron,

 

 

 

 

 

enhanceddiffusion is observed.Thisoverallmechanism

 

 

 

 

 

 

hasbeenqualitativelysimulated

by severalauthors[9],

 

 

 

 

 

 

[35].However,

nodirectcomparisonwithexperiments

 

1000500 0

 

 

E0001500

has beer, reported. On the other hand, three-dimensional

 

~

experimentshavebeendesignedrecentlytostudypre-

 

 

 

D e p t h ( a n g s t r o m s )

 

 

 

Fig. 5 . Simulation of arsenicdiffusionfrom AsSG film, by RTA at 1050°C

cisely these effects [36].. The present model was used to

 

simulate it and,

moreover,

to check the capability veryfor-

 

 

 

 

 

long-timediffusion(here

16 h at850°C).Fig.

4 shows

usingRTAfortemperaturesrangingfrom950°Cto

 

the phosphorus and boron profiles after 5 and 16 h of dif-

1050°C. Arsenicconcentrationintheoxidewasonthe

fusion (a 100-pm-deep mesh was used). The initial boron

order of 8 X lo2’at/cm3. A typical result is presented in

distribution is alsoreported.Itcanbeclearlyseen

 

that

Fig. 5, in which arsenic concentrations at the interface are

phosphorus diffusion with the well-known kink and tail,

 

not shown since they are not really significant (the oxide

as well as boron-enhanced diffusion are well reproduced.

layerwasetchedpriortoperforming

 

SIMS). Usingthe

It should be noted thatvery few boron diffusion

takes

placedefault parameters for arsenic defined previously, the ex-

if phosphorusisnotpresent

on thesurface.Inthiskind

 

perimentalresultsarenotreproducedandtheerror

on

of simulation, one of the most important factoris the sur-

junction depth is very large. This could

be explained by

facephosphorusconcentration.Effectively,thismaxi-

 

 

two mechanisms: 1) the very high arsenic concentrations

mum concentration controls the amount of interstitial

su-

at the interface and some segregation effect. This would

persaturation(mainly

via thekineticreactions

(4),

(5)) ,

increasethedoseinsiliconbuttheexperimentalshapes

which in turn determines boron-enhanced diffusion.In our

cannot be reproduced. 2 ) Effect of stress in the oxide on

case, the surface concentration was deduced from the ex-

the silicon substrate. This point was checked and no suf-

perimentalprofiles.Thisprocedurewassufficienttoob-

 

ficientstress

was determined. Hence,

we propose here a

tain the good agreement as shown

in this figure.

 

 

 

third possibility: the diffused profiles suggest a very high

In order to produce extremely shallow junctions, dop-

diffusivityduetosupersaturation

of pointdefects.This

ing fromvariousfilmsisexpectedtoplayanincreasing

 

 

wouldresult

in theexponential-likeprofiles.Hence,the

role [ 2 ] . The filmscan

beeitherpolysilicon,silicide,

or

only possibility to simulate precisely the experimental re-

dopedoxide.Thelatterpossibilitymightbeusefulfor

 

 

 

sults for all diffusion rimes, was to suppose a high defect

futureDRAMtechnologies.Withinthisframe,doping

 

 

 

injectionfromtheinterfaceduringthevery

first step of

from arsenic-silicate glass (AsSG) films has been studied.

annealing (about 0.5 s). This explains the huge diffusivity

0.26 pm of AsSG was deposited at 675°C and annealed

 

observedforthe 1-s profile,andalsothealmostnormal

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

BACCUS er ol : STUDY OF NONEQUILIBRIUM DIFFUSION MODELING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

655

diffusion from 5 s to 1 min. Such procedures were applied

lOI4 at/cm2 at 60 keV)atfour

differenttemperatures:

successfullyforothertemperatures.Theexactmecha-

 

8OO"C, 9OO0C, 95OoC,and 1000°C. One of the key pa-

nisms by whichpointdefects

areinjected

insiliconare

rametersforsuchsimulations

isthedescriptionofthe

 

not clear atpresent,butcouldbeexplained

by the very

damage induced by ion implantation, which is taken into

highconcentration of arsenic in theoxide,which might

account by

assuminghighconcentrationsofinterstitials

 

drag in silicon a significant amount of silicon atoms. This

and vacancies. As these vacancies and interstitial profiles

example is typical of the type of problems

that will have

were found to be almost identical [40], we use always the

to be modeled in the near future.

 

 

 

 

sameinitialdistributions

 

forthesetwospecies.More-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

over, the amountof damage is assumed to be directlypro-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

portional to the dose. These distributions can now be de-

IV. ANOMALOUSDIFFUSIONAFTERION IMPLANTATION

 

 

 

Ontheonehand,

they canbe

Investigating anomalous diffusion arising after ion im-

terminedintwoways.

obtainedfromMonteCarlosimulations(MC),andspe-

 

plantation is the most interesting application of the pres-

 

cially,Hoblerprovidedone-andtwo-dimensionaltabu-

 

entmodelbecausethisis

by natureacompletenonequi-

 

lations for the usual dopants [40]. Note that in these tab-

librium phenomenon. As reported in the Introduction, by

ulations,self-annealingduringionimplantationwasnot

 

usingnonequilibriummodeling,boron-transient-en-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

takenintoaccount,thus

thecalculatedvaluesareover-

 

hanceddiffusion

at950°Cwasqualitatively

reproduced

 

estimated. On the other hand, a first-order modeling is to

[171, and

the temperature dependence thisof

transient

time

suppose that the concentrations of interstitials and vacan-

wasalsodeterminedforboronat1050°Cand1150°C

 

 

 

 

cies can be obtained by simply multiplying the implanted

[181. Concerninglow-temperature,arseniciphosphorus

 

 

dopant profile. Since these initial defect distributions

are

junctions have been studiedwith a local equilibrium model

at present not well determined (moreover, they might de-

[37]. General agreement could bc obtained, although this

pend on the exact ion-implantation conditions, such as the

approach is not strictly valid because some basic assump-

current) we have

usedbothmethodstostudytheirinflu-

 

tions are notverified,such

as equilibrium. In thisstudy

 

enceonthe

finaldopantprofile.Concerningthespecies

 

[37], only one temperature was investigated

(900°C). On

 

includingboron,

it hasbeenfoundexperimentallythat

 

the other hand, empirical modeling has been successfully

 

after ion implantation boron is mainly located on intersti-

reported in the past few years [38], in which thediffusion

tialsites [41],

so that (BZ)speciesdeterminestheinitial

coefficientstake

intoaccountthedamage

by

assuming

dopantprofile.

The resultingevolutionduringannealing

 

transientmultiplyingfactors.This

is analternativesolu-

 

is almost the same as reported

in [ 171: a progressive de-

tiontotheusualdiffusionmodelsbecauseitisveryat-

 

 

crease ofI and V by diffusion and interactionswith dopant

tractive from the viewpoint of CPU time. However,

it is

species-B

and @I)-and

exchange in the relative levels

not based on physical principles and the extension to two

of B and ( B I ) .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dimensions is notstraightforward.

In any case, such em-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Simulations have been carried outin the following three

piricalsolutionhighlightsthecomplexity

of

simulating

cases for the initial defect distribution: 1)

4 times the im-

directly these phenomena.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

planted dopant profile,

2) 20 times the dopant profile,

3)

In the following, it is shown that the present model can

deduced from MC simulations [40]. In case 3), the max-

explaintheanomalousdiffusionintherange

of 800°C-

imum value of

I and Vis about 200 times the maximum

1050"C, and the advantage of RTA over furnace anneal-

dopant concentration. As a function of temperature, Fig.

ingin

limitingtheamount

ofdisplacementisverified.

6 shows the evolution of saturation time which is defined

Moreover, the influence on diffusion of the choice of ini-

asfollows:

it isconsideredthatanomalousdiffusionis

 

tial point-defectsdistributionisdiscussed.

Thesesimu-

 

achieved once the amount of diffusion is compatible with

lationsare

firstpresentedforthecaseof

boron(from

the predictions of usual steady-state models without point

Michel

[3]), andforthecaseof

coupled

anenidboron

defects [l], [24]. It shouldbenotedthatresultsforcase

 

diffusion in a 0.5-pm Bi-CMOS process (from Norishima

 

2 lie between the ones for case1 and 3, and are not shown

[4], [39]). Finally, basic electrical characteristics are sim-

ulated for a bipolar n-p-n transistor and two-dimensional

hereforclarity.The

 

firstremarkisthataremarkable

 

agreement is found between experiments and simulation.

effects are presented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To our knowledge, it is the first time that such agreement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A . Boron Diffusion: Michel

's Experiments

 

 

 

is obtained overa wide range of temperature: from800°C

 

 

 

to lOOO"C, where the saturation time evolves from around

Theanomalousdiffusionofboronafterlow-doseion

 

5 s to 30-40 min. The second conclusionis that the choice

implantation was studied as a function of annealing tem-

of initial defect distribution

does not change significantly

perature by Michel [ 31. Thedurationtime

oftransient-

the saturation time. This means that the activation energy

enhanced diffusion (or saturation time) was found tohave

andamount

ofsaturationtimereflectthebasicinterac-

 

an activation energy of more than 4.5 eV. This activation

tions between dopants and point defects, and depends on

energy is

significantly greater than the ones for

impurity

some combining factors such as the diffusivity of defects,

diffusion in silicon, thus

it cannot be explained only

by a

binding energies, and strength of the kinetic reactions.

 

large diffusivity

of boronhnterstitial pairs. We have sim-

Fig. 7 represents the amount of boron displacement at

ulatedtheprocessesreported

in [3] (boronimplant

2 X

the end of the anomalous diffusion time,

as a function of

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

656

 

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES,

VOL. 39. NO. 3 . MARCH 1992

 

 

 

temperaturerange.

In

fact,ourcalculationsdid

notin-

 

 

 

clude the

formation of

some clustersor precipitates, which

 

 

 

are not present at

1000°C but are obvious at 800°C [3].

 

 

 

It would reduce the amount

of displacement by reducing

 

 

 

theamount

of mobileboronspecies.Thisphenomenon

 

 

 

 

has been treated recently by Cowern using an equilibrium

 

 

 

model,and

itcan

be introducedinacompatible

wayin

 

 

 

the present model. Reaction between m substitutional bo-

 

 

 

ron atomsand n interstitialsmightform"Intermediate

 

 

 

 

Defect Configurations"[42]

* IDC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mB + nl

(27)

 

 

 

In ordertoextendthepredictioncapabilities

of

our

 

 

 

model,this

kind offormulation

will beimplemented

in

 

 

 

the near future in our simulations.

 

 

 

IOOO/T I'KJ

3. Application to n-p-n Bipolar structures

 

 

Fig. 6. Evolution of saturationtime

as a function of temperature in the

 

 

case of boron diffusion after low-dose ion implantatlon. Measurements are

Theformationof

n-p-nbipolartransistorsundervar-

 

from [3]. The initial defects distributions are: case 1 , 4 times the implanted

ious conditions has been studied and has demonstrated in

boron profile; case 2.20 times the boron Implanted profile:case 3, deduced

fromMonte Carlo calculations.

 

a very clear manner the importance of damage introduced

 

 

 

by ion implantation [4], [39]. Arsenic was implanted at a

 

 

 

dose and energy of 5 X IO"

at/cm2 and 40 keV, respec-

 

 

 

tively. Boron was implanted at a dose and energy of 4 X

 

 

 

lOI 3 at/cm2 and 20 keV, respectively. In some cases, ar-

 

 

 

senic was not included in order to separate the effects due

 

 

 

to each species (this is also almost equivalent to assume

 

 

 

that arsenic would be diffused from polysilicon). Furnace

 

 

 

annealingwasperformedat

800"C, 850°C, and 900°C

500

 

 

for 30min. RTA was also used for 15 s, at temperatures

200

 

 

ranging from 850°C to 1050°C. From thesimulation point

 

 

of view, the exact thermal conditions were taken into ac-

100L

I

I

count(includingramp-up),andtheimplantedprofiles

 

 

08

0.9

wereadjustedto

SIMS measurements,whenneeded.

 

 

 

 

IOOO/T PKI

Comparisons between the present model and the standard

Fig. 7. Boron displacement as a function of temperature for the same con-

one-with

the meaning described

in Section 111-A-were

 

ditionsas

Fig. 6 .

 

also performed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

temperature. This boron displacement refers to thediffer-

Fig. 8 summarizes the resultsas a function of annealing

temperaturefor:a)theborondisplacementatthebase/

 

ence in boron profiles before and after diffusion, aatcon-

collector junction in the case where arsenic is not intro-

 

centration level of 1016at/cm3. Now, case 3 predicts too

duced, b)

theborondisplacementatthebaseicollector

 

 

much diffusion, as expected. The best results are obtainedjunction in the case of coupled arsenidboron diffusion, c)

when using the lowest initial distributions (case 1). Apart

the base width, and d) the enlitterjunction depth. We con-

fromtheuncertaintyabouttheinitialdefectprofiles,a

sider first the case of boron-only diffusion and the varia-

precisesimulationshouldtakeintoaccountthethermal

tion in boron displacement. Again, two cases were stud-

history of the wafer, e.g., ramp-up conditions. However,

ied: the initial I and V distributionsare 1 )

4 timesthe

in opposition to the results presentedin the following sec-

implanted dopant profile, or 2 ) deduced from

MC simu-

tion (IV-B), noinformationisavailable,and

as aresult,

lations [40]. Fig.8(a)showsthatthestandardmodel

more quantitative comparisons with the experiments can-

underestimates the boron diffusion. On the other hand, it

not be expected. Nevertheless, it can be remarked that a

wasfound that. whensimulatingpreciselythethermal

calculationneglectingion-implantationdamag?would

conditions,usingthedefectsdistributionsfrom

MC

predictonlysmalldisplacements:lessthan

50 A for all

slightly exaggerates boron diffusion, but good prediction

thermal conditions [3]. From our calculations, it was also

capabilitiesareobserved.Thusfromthesimulationsof

deduced that the most

important factor concerning the dis-boron diffusion [3], 141, 1391, it is concluded that reason-

placementisthemaximumlevelofdefectsand

not the

able results are obtained

by decreasing the defect profile

exact shapeof the initial profiles, because of the high dif-

predicted by Hobler's calculations, with an amplitude de-

fusivities of I and V. Finally, it can be seen in Fig. 7 that

termined from our empirical modelingof damage.

goodagreementcannot

be obtainedoverthecomplete

Thecaseofcoupled

diffusion is morecomplex.For

For individual use by an IEEE Electron Devices Society member purchasing this product.

BACCUS pi a/.:STUDYMODELlKGOFDIFFUSIONNONbQlJlLIBRIUM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of RTA and justifies the use of high-temperature and short-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

timeannealingtoobtainveryshallowjunctions.Thisis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

associated with thepoint-defectremovalkineticssimu-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lated here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c)Theseremarks

holdalso

forarsenic diffusion (Fig.

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8(d)).However,theanomalousdisplacementis

 

not so

u

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

large as for boron, but still, it is always greater than pre-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dicted by the standard model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

d) Experimentally, a significant reduction in basewidth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

wasobservedbetweenthe1000°Cand

 

 

 

1050°C RTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

cases, due to

the arsenicdiffusion. This is also reproduced

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by the simulations. It is interesting to notice that a similar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

result was obtained when forming emitterby doping from

ANNEALINGTEMPERATURE (%I

 

 

 

polysilicon [4], [39]. This is duetotheevolution

of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

diffusivities D(As- v) and D,,,- ,)

with temperature.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e)Exactinclusionoframp-upconditionsisneeded,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

otherwise the types of behavior as

a function of temper-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ature cannot be reproduced, specially in the case of fur-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

naceannealing(forexample,whenneglectingramp-up,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

more boron diffusion would be predicted at800°C than at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900"C, contrary to the experimental results. Actually, the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900°Cannealing

 

firstincludesaramp-upstartingat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

800"C, thusthe

anomalous diffusion is

 

mainlydeter-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mined by thedurationofthisramp-up,andnot

 

by the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900"C, 30-mindiffusion).It

is

wellknownexperimen-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tally that ramp-up is very important to control dopant dif-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fusion.This

isexplainedhere

 

by

thepoint-defectski-

 

 

 

 

 

PC1

 

 

netic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANNEALINGTEMPERATURE

 

 

f ) Finally, it is concluded that the usual standard model

Fig. 8 . Study of bipolar devices withRTA

or furnaceannealing.The

ex-

fails completely to describe the experimental results. This

periments are from [4],[39]. (a) Boron displaccmcnt as a function of tem-

isparticularlytrueforborondiffusionanditsimpacton

perature(borononly case). Theinitial

defects distributlonsare: case

l.4

the base width,

for furnace annealing.

 

 

 

times thc implanted boron profile; case

2, deduced from Monte Carlo

cal-

 

 

 

culations.For the resultsfromcoupledarseniclborondiffusion,theinitial

 

These results are illustrated

in another manner in Fig.

point-defectsdistribution is definedasthe

rnaxlrnurn of the implanted ar-

9(a) and (b), which represent the arsenicand boron-sim-

senic profile and o f 4 times the boron implanted profile. (b) Boron displace-

ment as a function of temperature (coupled diffusion casc). ( c ) Base width

ulated profiles afterthe 900°C furnace annealing,by using

as a function of temperature. (d) Emitterjunctiondepth

X,, as a function

the standard and new model, respectively. In thefirst case

of temperaturc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Fig. 9(a)), the boron profile is almost unchanged

by the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

diffusion step,

but

usingthenewmodelaremarkable

 

high-doseionimplantation,

 

the

siliconbecomesamor-

 

agreementisobtained(Fig.9(b)).There

isonlyaslight

 

 

difference forarsenicdiffusion.Fig.

10 shows,forthis

phous and the modeling of damage

used here may

reach

900°C furnace diffusion case, the dopant

profiles as well

its limits. Possible extensions of this work

to describe, in

as the species involving defects. In additionto the Poisson

a more precise manner, the physical mechanisms will be

equation, 7 coupled equations are solved, and due to the

discussedbrieflyintheConclusions.However,itisim-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

portant to investigate the possibilities of the present work. assumptionofequilibriumbetweenchargedandneutral

In any case, compared to the

boron-only situation,

as the

species, 14 species are actually deduced from these types

of calculations. Only some of them are representedin Fig.

amountofdamageisenhanced

by thearsenicimplanta-

10. This illustrates the complexityof the calculations and

tion,muchmoreborondisplacementisobtained,as

 

 

 

Our simula-

the need for sophisticated models when aiming to repro-

clearlyseenexperimentally(Fig.8(a),(b)).

duce the experimental behavior

in a consistent manner.

tions revealed that a good description of the experimental

In order to perform a comprehensive study, the electri-

features can be reproduced by simply choosing the initial

calbehaviorofthesedeviceswassimulated.Thetrian-

 

I and V profiles to be equal to the implanted arsenic dis-

 

gularmeshdevicesimulator

TRIMEDES [43] wasused

tribution. This condition was used for all the sirnularions

in the way described in [44]: three one-dimensional sim-

reported hereafter in the

case of

 

 

 

 

coupled arsenic/boron dif-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fusion.Fig.8(a)-(d)shows

very interestingresults:

 

 

ulationswereperformedfortheintrinsicbipolardevice

 

 

(the results Dresented above). the linked base, and the ex-

a) Borondisplacement

is

greater whenusingfurnace

trinsic base regions. Since for this technology under study

annealing, in comparison with RTA.

 

 

 

 

the results are mainly determined by the profile in the in-

b) This displacement is drastically reduced in the case

trinsicregion,

 

thisapproach

issufficient

 

(441. Thede-