Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5670_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆
1.
2.
There may be a mathematical model, formulated for a given situation. For implementation of the model, the values of the number of parameters must be mentioned or known. The set of data is known through the experiments or observations. The job is to determine the values of parameters that fit best with the data. Using the term ‘best’ requires some references that have been used to some criteria for optimization and just one interpretation should always be used. Applications have been found in statistics (regression, maximum probability), econometrics, and virtually every area of science.
Problem Types
In general, during optimization two types of optimization problem are encountered –
Constrained, and
Unconstrained.
The term, constraints, means restrictions placed on the system. Restrictions may refer to physical limitations or probably by simple practicality, for example, economic considerations. Within the area of physical reality, most importantly and commonly the constrained problem is observed in pharmaceutical operations, unconstrained problems are very rarely found. In pharmaceutical systems, the formulator may always experience restrictions which are of competitive in nature; for example, it would not be reasonable to assume that the hardest tablets can be prepared with least compression and ejection forces, the tablets will disintegrate fast and will have good dissolution profile. During optimization, it is sometimes become necessary to forgo one characteristic for another. Hence, the primary objective of optimization may not be to find out the absolute maxima or minima, but to find out an overall preselected or expected result for each parameter. Drug products are developed to get the best formulation by an effective compromise between competing parameters. Within a given set of restrictions the process is finalized.
Moreover, in pharmaceutical manufacturing the difficulty is that the formulations are not simple systems. Since these are produced by using many ingredients, they have many variables also. The ingredients may interact with one another and produce unexpected results.
Constrained optimization problems may have more than two approaches, out of which two are being discussed here. The first approach is the Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique (SUMT) and the second approach is the direct or constrained methods. The general constrained optimization problem can be solved initially by converting it to a similar unconstrained problem and solved by using any one of appropriate algorithms. The SUMT approach is equivalent to unconstrained problem by sacrificing the original objective function for any constraint violation.
In unconstrained optimization problems there are no restrictions. For a given pharmaceutical system one might wish to make the hardest tablet possible.
https://t.me/med1917
•
•
Variables
There are many variables associated with formulation development and with the process of manufacturing. Mathematically these can be classified into two groups:
Independent variables, and
Dependent variables
The variables related to development and manufacturing of formulations are called independent variables; for example, amount of an ingredient to be added, mixing time, temperature, etc. These are directly controlled by the formulation scientists.
The dependent variables are the responses to or characteristics of the in process materials or finished drug products. This is to be indicated that the process and formulation variables are independent variables. These variables are directly controlled by the formulation scientist. These variables include the amount of an ingredient to be added or the duration of mixing in a particular step of process. The dependent variables are the responses or the parameters of the materials in progress or the finished drug product. Generally, these occur directly as result of any change in the formulation or process. If in a particular process the numbers of variables are more, the optimization process becomes more complicated. Despite of the number of variables, a given response must be related to independent variables. Once for a given response such relationship becomes known, it will define a response surface as shown in Fig.2.1. To find out the values of independent variables, X 1 and X 2 , the surface needs to
be evaluated and the most desirable level of response, Y can be achieved. Any number of variables can be considered mathematically in a complicated way, but only two variables can be considered graphically as indicated by the Fig 2.1.
Fig. 2.1 Response surface representing the relationship between independent variablesm X 1 and X 2 and dependent
variable, Y
1
Optimization Techniques in Pharmaceutical Formulation
https://t.me/med1917
For optimization there may be many methods such as classical and others. These methods have been described very nicely in the literature. A general flowchart’ has been shown in Fig
2.2 which can describe the general optimization methods. If some factors or variables are
changed on a real system, the effect on the real system can be directly observed at the output in forms of property. These real data can be used to develop mathematical model. The responses from the predictive models can then be used to optimize.
Fig. 2.2 Flowchart for optimation
Simplex Method
This model generally is most used in pharmaceutical experimental optimization. This model was originally proposed by Spendley et al.
10
. This method can be widely used in areas other than formulation and processing. A very good and appropriate example to explain the principle of this method is the application to the development of analytical method using a continuous flow analyzer.
A simplex is a geometric figure having one more point than the number of factors. Thus, for two factors or independent variables, the simplex can be represented by a triangle. After determination of the shape of the simplex, the method can use a simplex of fixed size or of variable sizes that are determined by comparing the magnitudes of the responses after each successive calculation. The Fig 2.3 shows a set of simplex movements to the optimum conditions using a variable size method. The Fig shows that two independent variables represented by the axes show the speeds of the pumps for the two reagents required in the analysis. The lowest triangle represents the initial simplex; the vertices show the spectrophotometric response. The plan is to move toward a better response by moving away from the worst response. Since the poorest response is 0.25, the conditions are selected at the vortex, 0.66, and certainly, development is obtained. One can follow the experimental path to the optimum, 0.721.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2.3 Schematic diagram of simplex method for optimization (Response is absorbance at a definite wavelength)
For pharmaceutical formulations, the simple method was used to search for an optimum capsule formula. This report also describes the necessary methods of reflection, expansion, and contraction for the appropriate geometric figures. The same laboratories applied this method to study a solubility problem involving butoconazole nitrate in a multicomponent system
11
.
An alteration of the simplex technique
12
was reported to a TI-59 calculator and applied successfully to a direct compression tablet of acetaminophen (paracetamol). When applied this method
13
to a liquid system (a pharmaceutical solution) it could able to optimize physical stability of the product. Later on this method was applied to analytical works. Deming observed
14
that initially in absence of complete knowledge of the response, the
simplex method was considered probably the most appropriate type.
Lagrangian Method
This method represents the mathematical optimization method. The method is an extension of Classical method and is most probably first time used in pharmaceutical formulation and process optimization. This method was selected and applied to formulation of tablet having two independent variables
15
. A constant amount of the drug, phenyl propanolamine hydrochloride was taken and the amounts of disintegrant (corn starch) and lubricant (stearic acid) were considered as independent variables and varied as X 1 and X 2 respectively. The
hardness, friability, volume, in-vitro release rate, and urinary elimination rate in human beings were considered as dependent variables.
https://t.me/med1917
•
•
•
This method requires that before optimization experimentation should be completed to generate the mathematical model. Nine formulations were prepared and the experimental design was kept 3 2 factorial. Polynomial models relating the response variables to the independent variables were generated by a backward stepwise regression analysis program. The analyses were performed on a polynomial of the form:
According to standard stepwise regression method, the terms were retained or eliminated. In the above equation y stands for any given response and Bi stands for the regression coefficient for the various terms containing the levels of the independent variables. For each response or variable, one equation is created.
From the polynomial equations, a graphic method may be obtained. To apply the Lagrangian method, this problem should be expressed mathematically as follows:
To maintain the solution within the experimental range the equation 5 and 6 are used. Before the operation starts, the previous inequality constraints need to be converted to equality constraints. This can be done by introducing a slack variable q, for each. Then a variety of equations are combined into a Lagrange function, F, and this requires an introduction of Lagrange multiplier, λ for each constraint.
A technique called sensitivity analysis can give information and the formulator can further exchange one property for another. For sensitivity analysis the formulator explains the constraint optimization problem for systematic changes in the secondary objectives.
Several steps in the Lagrange method is summarized below:
Determination of the function of the objective
Determination of the constraints
Changing the inequality constraints to equality constraints
Fixing or deciding the Lagrange function, F as mentioned below:
https://t.me/med1917
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
One Lagrange multiplier, λ for each constraint,
One slack variable, q for each inequality constraint,
Partial differentiating the Lagrange function for each variable and setting the derivatives equal to zero.
Solution of the set of simultaneous equation,
Replacement of the resulting values into objective functions.
The computer performs all these steps of the Lagrange method; however manually this method requires application of significant mathematical information (input) from the person concerned. This method was modified by Buck and his associates
16
. They modified the
philosophy into four phases and defined as;
Preliminary planning phase,
Experimental phase,
Analytical phase, and
Verification phase.
The concept was demonstrated by them using a tablet and a suspension formulation for optimization as reference examples.
Search method
On the contrary, search methods do not require continuity or differentiability of the function as required by the mathematical optimization method. It is to be computable. In these methods, the response surfaces are searched to find the combination of independent variables by various methods to get the optimum by the appropriate equation. The Lagrangian method can handle several responses or dependent variables. Generally, it is limited to two independent variables. However, Schwartz et al.
17
applied a search method of optimization to a pharmaceutical system. It is a computer assisted method and can handle five independent variables.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2.4 Graphic location of optimum (maximum and minimum)
Extreme vertices design
Anderson and McLean first described the method
18
. This is a fixed design, developed for pharmaceutical mixtures with only one independent variable, the amount of each of the ingredients in the mixture. There is no process variable such as temperature, pressure, time, etc. in the design. The response variable is commonly some direct measure of each mixture prepared, such as viscosity, dispersibility and solubilization capacity. Concentration ranges for each ingredient in the mixture are set by the experimenter. An algorithm is used to determine the experimental points. Snee and Marquardt
19,20
improved the algorithm developed initially by Anderson and McLean. Currently, the Extreme Vertices design was applied to a pharmaceutical solubility problem
21
.
Classical method
Classic optimization method has been resulted from application of calculus to the basic problem of finding the minimum and maximum of a function. The method is useful for problems which is not too complex and does not have more than few variables. However, the concept is important. The graph in Fig 2.4 represents the relationship between a response (Y­axis) and a single independent variable (X-axis). It is a hypothetical system, the entire graph is visible, and the highest point (maximum) and the lowest point (minimum) can be marked. Unnecessary use of the calculus in plotting of data using equation is not desired. If the relationship between X and Y is expressed as: Y = f (X)
Y becomes the function of X. The first derivative can be taken, set equal to zero, and X can be solved to obtain the values of maximum and minimum. When the functions of X are more than one, there will be more than one solution subject to the first derivative is set equal to zero. All the various solutions may be maxima or minima, or a mixture of both.
There are other methods also to find out whether a maximum or minimum is being determined; that is, using second derivative. There are methods to determine the maximum or minimum; for example, by examining the many local peaks. These methods are explained well in the elementary calculus. Cooper and Steinberg have explained the methods of optimization.
When for the response Y, the relationship is given as a function of two independent variables, X 1 and X 2 , it can be expressed as
Y = f (X 1 , X 2 )
Graphically, there are contour plots as shown in Fig 2.5 on which the axes represent how two independent variables X 1 and X 2 and the contours represent a specific level of Y. Moreover,
an optimum can be selected graphically. The pair of X values for the optimum can be located by calculating mathematically with partial derivatives of the function. In case of more than
https://t.me/med1917
two variables, it becomes impossible calculate graphically. Mathematically it is still possible by using partial derivatives,matrices, determinants, and so on.
Fig. 2.5 Contour plot representing relationship between X 1 and X
2
Statistical Design
The scientists have been used their prior knowledge for development of formulations satisfactorily without considering critical aspects, such as high dose, poor aqueous solubility, poor compressibility or other physicochemical properties. Sometimes, adequate formulation is developed, but there is no time to spend in developing the best possible formulation or process. By applying the principles of statistics efficient and economical information can be understood by the relationships between the variables. However, it is doubtful that the optimum formulation or process can be determined without the use of a mathematical model. To get the maximum information using the least number of experiments, statistical designs were developed. Of course, the interactions between variables as well as experimental errors would remain. The planning must be carefully designed and the statistical rules must be adhered. The experimenter should accurately define why the experiment is being done and the steps to be followed. When an entirely new process or formulation is required to be developed, using a high speed mixer or a controlled release product, this scientist should realize that a sequential approach is necessary. This method needs to carry out small pilot experiments to generate information for making decision to provide some estimate of experimental error. When studies on planning using statistical experimental designs are being done following steps are to be followed:
Describe the problem carefully to be solved,
Select the independent variables, and
Decide the upper and lower limits for each,
Identify the dependent variables to be measured,
Identify the mathematical model to be used,
Supply an estimate of experimental error,
https://t.me/med1917
1.
2.
Determine how the data will be collected,
Decide how the data will be analyzed,
Decide how the results will be implemented.
Most used optimization methods can be broadly divided into two categories:
Experimentation and optimization study move simultaneously,
Optimization starts after completion of experimentation.
The first type stands for evolutionary operations and is the simple method. The second one is by more classic mathematical and search methods. For the methods of the second type, it is necessary to relate between any dependent variable and one or more independent variables. The necessary relationship can be obtained by two possible methods:
Theoretical, and
Empirical.
If the formulator knows beforehand the theoretical equation for the required properties of formulation, no experimentation would be necessary. However, much of the work in pharmaceutical formulations has been carried out in search of such relationships. It is the responsibility of the formulator to generate the relationships between the variables for the particular formulation and process. According to Davis
22
, the behavior of chemical reactions or any system is directed by ascertainable laws. This was a theoretical statement. Optimum conditions could be possibly determined by applying such laws. Practically, the underlying mechanisms of the system are frequently so complicated that an empirical approach becomes necessary. The empirical or experimental approach can be applied for a system with single independent variable. The formulator performs the experiment at various levels, measures the desired property, and finds out a relationship, commonly by simple regression analysis or by the leastsquares method. Generally, there is more than one important variable. The experimenter must start the work of statistical design of experiments and multiple linear analyses. Statistical design and multiple regression analysis are separate and relatively large fields. There are methods available for selecting experimental points so that (1) entire area of interest is covered, and (2) analysis of the results would allow separation of variables. That is, statistical analysis should be performed in such a way that ‘which variable is responsible for which specific result’ can be understood.
Factorial design is the most widely used experimental plan. By multiple regression methods, it is possible to generate the relationships between the variables from the experimental data. The resulting equations become the basis of optimization.
Processing (Analysis of Data)
https://t.me/med1917
After completion of appropriate experiments for a fixed design, the values for each response and the corresponding values for each independent variable are to be paired. In a statistical software package on a computer, the data is entered. The selected model should be used in a regression analysis for each set of independent variable/ response variable data. Coefficients of regression model could be calculated for each data set and the effects of the independent variables on each response could also be estimated. The model, thus completed, should be examined to see whether response surface based on statistical tests have been adequately described or not. This can be done by following the method indicated below:
Compare the absolute values of the regression coefficient with its standard error. The standard error should be less than 50% of the value of the coefficient.
Examine the residuals indicating the difference between the actual responses measured and those predicted by the regression model. The residuals include variation due to experimental error and variations of the model from actual values.
By subtracting pure experimental error from the total error, the lack of fitness is to be measured. The result of the calculation indicating the amount of error due to lack of fitness should be tested using the F-test. Lack of fitness shows how well a model can fit the data, independent of experimental error. Lack of fitness indicates how well a model fits the data, independent of experimental error. This procedure is most useful for models based on theory.
The value of correlation coefficient to be examined to see whether it is close to 1.0. If the value lies within 0.9 – 1.0, generally it is accepted for most of the developmental works. If a coefficient is found to be more than 0.95, it is considered as very good.
The ultimate test of a model is to predict a response; if possible, by setting the levels of the independent variable to some level not used in the experiments. The prediction is then tested by performing an experiment at the selected conditions and comparing the measured response to the prediction.
Once a model is found suitable, it can be used to optimize the system under study or it can help to characterize the system.
Utilization of Model
The aim of optimization is to find out the levels of each independent variable that can produce the best response. To search for the optimum, the range of values must be less than or equal to the range used in the experimental design. The method used to find out the optimum point is called a grid search. The method forces the calculation of all responses within the ranges of the independent variables.
The output of the search could be all calculated responses (Y values), or a listing of values of independent variables that yield Y values within selected constraints. For example, a tablet is expected to have hardness (kp) within a range of Y
H1
to Y
H2
and a dissolution time (T80)
https://t.me/med1917