Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5423_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
2 Recent Development in invivo Clinical Gene Therapy Platforms
https://t.me/medicina_free
40
small number of people with an IRD after a onetime injection in each eye and ongoing follow‐up assessments suggesting a long‐term benefit. Furthermore, to address reimbursement concerns, it was reported that Spark committed to offer rebates to health insurers if patients failed to meet specified vision thresholds 30–90days and 30months following Luxturna treatment[16, 17]. Five years on, there have been no additional retinal gene therapies approved despite numerous development programs since Luxturna was approved (see Table2.1). Some of the trials have reported safety events while others have reported efficacy hurdles asso­ciated with what’s considered a high bar for approval by the FDA[20].
2.1.1.4 Zolgensma (onasemnogene abeparvovec), Marketed by Novartis
Zolgensma claims the title of the first FDA‐approved invivo gene therapy for a genetic disease, which is administered systemically. It was also the first AAV vec­tor administered systemically at 1.1E14 vg/kg, which was the highest dose of AAV at that time. Zolgensma is now approved in more than 40 countries and more than 2000 patients have been treated with Zolgensma globally across clinical trials, managed access programs, and in the commercial setting.
Zolgensma was developed to treat SMA which affects motor neurons. SMA is a rare, genetic neuromuscular disease and a leading genetic cause of infant death[21]. SMA is actually a group of inherited neuromuscular disorders charac­terized by loss of lower motor neurons in the spinal cord. The loss of lower motor neurons leads to progressive muscle weakness, muscle wasting and low muscle tone (hypotonia) which affects muscle functions responsible for breathing, swal­lowing and basic movement[22, 23].
SMA is caused by deletion or mutation of the SMN1 gene, which encodes a protein known as SMN. This protein plays an important role in the functioning and maintenance of motor neurons. The SMN2 gene is a paralog of SMN1 and also encodes the SMN protein, which can compensate for the loss of the SMN1 gene. However, most SMN protein produced by the SMN2 gene is not functional, which means that the SMN2 gene can only partially compensate for the loss of the
SMN1 gene. For this reason, an individual with SMA who has more copies of the SMN2 gene will produce more functional SMN protein and may be better able to
compensate for the loss of the SMN1 gene, leading to less severe disease. Generally, more copies of SMN2 are associated with milder SMA disease[23].
SMA1 onset typically occurs before 6 months of age and is characterized by progressive weakness, including loss of respiratory and swallowing functions. Infants with SMA1 do not achieve major development milestones and experience progressive respiratory failure and frequent pulmonary infections[24]. Untreated SMA, in infants with two copies of SMN2 usually results in premature death or the need for permanent ventilation by 2 years of age. Loss of motor neurons can­not be reversed, so it is imperative to diagnose SMA and begin treatment,
https://t.me/medicina_free
https://t.me/medicina_free
2.1 Introduction 43
https://t.me/medicina_free
including proactive supportive care, as early as possible to halt irreversible motor neuron loss and disease progression. This observation has led to the addition of SMA to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) for newborn screen­ing programs[25].
Zolgensma (Onasemnogene abeparvovec) is a recombinant self‐complementary AAV9 containing a human SMN transgene under the control of a chicken β‐actin promoter and cytomegalovirus enhancer, which together ensure rapid and sus­tained transcription of SMN messenger RNA. The AAV9 capsid and promoter/ enhancer ensures body wide biodistribution, including into the brain and spinal cord via the blood‐brain barrier. Zolgensma is marketed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and was designed to directly address the genetic cause of the disease by replacing the function of the missing or non‐working SMN1 gene to halt disease progression through sustained SMN protein expression with a single, onetime IV infusion. Zolgensma is indicated for the treatment of pediatric patients less than 2 years of age with all types of SMA (with bi‐allelic mutations in the SMN1 gene), Package Insert– ZOLGENSMA (fda.gov).
The efficacy and safety of Zolgensma in patients with SMA type 1was assessed in a 2‐year, open‐label, phase 1 study (START). Data demonstrated that a onetime
13
infusion of dose 6.7
14
vg/kg in 12 patients resulted in longer survival than observed in historical
× 10
1.1
vg/kg of body weight in 3 patients or a therapeutic dose
× 10
controls. Two of three patients in the low‐dose cohort and all patients in the therapeutic‐dose cohort were alive without the need for permanent ventilation at 24months of age[3]. Patients in the therapeutic‐dose cohort also had significantly improved motor function and motor milestone achievements compared with his­torical cohorts. Eleven of twelve patients sat unassisted for ≥5 seconds, and two children pulled to a stand, stood, and walked independently. Regulatory approval was based on the data from this study. A long‐term follow‐up study is in progress but interim results were recently published in which a favorable safety profile was observed for up to 6.2 years after dosing, with sustained and durable efficacy (all patients were alive and were without the need for permanent ventilation[26]. This long‐term follow‐up study will monitor patients for 15 years (Long‐Term Follow‐up Study for Patients From AVXS‐101‐CL‐101– Full Text View– ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subsequently, Phase 3 (STR1VE) studies in different countries were initiated. The STR1VE‐US study which enrolled 22 symptomatic SMA patients, provided further evidence for the safety and efficacy of Zolgensma[27]. There were two patient deaths reported during these Phase 3 studies. However, the deaths (due to respiratory complications) were deemed unrelated to the intervention[28]. Analysis of postmortem tissue samples from these patients enabled an assess­ment of the vector biodistribution. This was the first study to demonstrate in humans the widespread biodistribution of vector genomes and transgene expres­sion throughout the CNS and peripheral organs after intravenous delivery of
2 Recent Development in invivo Clinical Gene Therapy Platforms
https://t.me/medicina_free
44
AAV9‐mediated gene therapy to treat a neurodegenerative disease. Zolgensma achieved an effective distribution, transduction and expression throughout the CNS and restored SMN expression[28].
Novartis is also developing an intrathecally (IT) administered version of Zolgensma called OAV‐101 IT which uses a lower dose of the AAV vector than currently approved for IV administration. This has the potential to broaden access to older patients with SMA. A Phase 1 study (called STRONG) with OAV‐101 IT led to significant increases in HFMSE (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale‐ Expanded) scores and a clinically meaningful response in older patients ≥2 years and <5 years old with SMA Type 2. AveXis presents AVXS‐101 IT data demon­strating remarkable increases in HFMSE scores and a consistent clinically mean­ingful response in older patients with SMA Type 2 | Novartis. In October 2019, the FDA partially suspended this trial because of findings in animals that showed dorsal root ganglia (DRG) mononuclear cell inflammation, which was sometimes accompanied by neuronal cell body degeneration or loss. The hold was lifted 2 years later after review of data from Novartis’ comprehensive nonclinical toxicol­ogy study in nonhuman primates (NHP) that addressed all issues identified, including questions of DRG injury following IT administration. Following this announcement, Novartis started a Phase 3 trial (called STEER) in patients with SMA Type 2 aged between 2 and 18 years (see Table2.2), which will build upon the Phase 1/2 STRONG study results.
With a $2.1million price tag, Zolgensma is often described as one of the most expensive drugs in the world. However, Novartis has justified this based on its dramatic effects in stopping SMA progression and helping babies reach mile­stones such as sitting up and chewing that they otherwise would not reach. The high cost has been debated on multiple points, including exacerbating inequali­ties in access to medicines for patients living in different countries, together with long‐term effectiveness of the gene therapy[30]. Zolgensma has been in the news more recently when two children with SMA died after receiving Zolgensma. The deaths resulted from acute liver failure, 5–6weeks posttreatment and about one to 10days after doctors began to taper corticosteroids. Systemic corticosteroids are administered before and after the gene therapy infusion to dampen the immune response to the AAV9 capsid, which would otherwise trigger liver enzyme eleva­tions. Indeed, the label for Zolgensma includes a black box warning that the drug “can increase liver enzyme levels and cause acute serious liver injury or acute liver failure.” Nevertheless, Novartis acknowledged these are the first fatal cases reported. Novartis Confirms Deaths of Two Patients Treated with Gene Therapy Zolgensma (genengnews.com).
Table2.2  Clinical trials withAAV-mediated gene replacement therapy forbrain/CNS disease.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Indication scDNA Capsid Sponsor Clinical Phase NCT
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
Giant Axonal Neuropathy
Canavan disease ASPA AAV9
Ceroid Lipofuscinoses CLN
FTD with GRN mutations (FTD‐GRN)
Parkinson’s disease GBA1 AAV9 Prevail Phase ½ NCT04127578 Huntington’s
disease
AAV‐Olig001: novel AAV comprising a chimeric mixture of AAV1, 2, 6, 8, and 9[29].
SMN1 AAV9 Novartis Phase 3 (IV in
GAN AAV9 Taysha Gene
AAV ‐ Olig‐001
CLN3
AAV9
CLN6
AAV9
CLN7
AAV9
 CLN5
AAV9
GRN AAV9 Prevail Phase ½ NCT04408625
HTT AAV5 UniQure Phase ½ NCT04120493/NCT05243017
Therapies Aspa Myrtelle Phase ½ Phase ½ NCT04998396NCT04833907
Amicus Amicus University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center
Neurogene
pre‐symptomatic SMA) Phase 3b (IV in symptomatic SMA) Phase 1 (IT) Phase 3 (IT in type 2 SMA)
Phase 1 NCT02362438
Phase ½ Phase ½ Phase ½
NCT03505099 NCT0485187NCT03381729 NCT05089656
NCT03770572 NCT02725580 NCT04737460 
NCT05228145
2 Recent Development in invivo Clinical Gene Therapy Platforms
Target tissue
)
https://t.me/medicina_free
46
2.1.2 Introduction: rAAV-cDNA (gene) Therapy Candidates
inClinical Development
There are many rAAV‐based cDNA replacement therapies that have reached the clinical development stage, which are not yet approved. These candidate AAV‐ mediated gene therapies have been developed to target a variety of diseases that affect the eye, brain, heart, liver, and skeletal muscle. These target tissues have many cells that need to receive the therapeutic gene for the therapy to be effective and therefore need to receive appropriate doses of the gene therapy product (measured in vector genomes, vg). Gene therapies that are administered to a local area of a smaller organ such as the eye, require a smaller dose compared to gene therapies for skeletal muscle diseases, which require systemic administration for delivery to all muscles and therefore require much larger doses (Figure2.1).
In the next section, candidate gene therapies are grouped according to the tissue type/system they target, which includes the eye, brain/central nervous system, heart, liver, and skeletal muscle. It is noteworthy that although many AAV‐ mediated gene therapies target the liver, the target indications are associated with
Dose of gene therapy (vg
Eye (local target)
11
~1x10
vg
Figure2.1  Target organs for AAV-mediated gene therapies in clinical development.
Target tissue size and accessibility impacts dose. Source: Modified from Tretiakova 2019, Scientific American[31].
Brain (local target)
12
vg
~1x10
Heart (systemic/local)
~1x1015/~1x10
Liver (systemic)
~1x10
12
14
vg
Muscle (systemic)
15
~1x10
vg
2.1 Introduction 47
https://t.me/medicina_free
pathology in non‐liver tissues. In these cases, the liver is used as the organ that produces the protein encoded by the transgene.
2.1.2.1  AAV-Gene Replacement Clinical Trials forthe Eye
The approval of Luxturna for LCA2 and RP patients with a biallelic RPE65muta­tion has resulted in a large number of additional gene replacement therapy clinical trials for IRD patients. The diseases targeted are Achromatopsia, Choroi­deremia, Leber congenital amaurosis types 1 and 2 (LCA1, LCA2), Leber Heredi­tary Optic Neuropathy (LHON), RP, and X‐linked RP.
2.1.2.2  Clinical Trials forHeart Disease
There are several AAV‐mediated gene therapy trials targeting the heart. However, the only trials in which a cDNA replacement approach is used are shown in Table2.3. The other clinical trials use AAV to deliver transgenes which express proteins that operate as bypass mechanisms. For example, delivery of SERCA2a (sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Calcium‐ATPase) with an AAV1 vector was devel­oped to treat heart failure. SERCA2a regulates cardiac contraction and relaxation by its role in controlling the level of Ca2+ in the cytosol and SR in the cardiomyo­cyte[32]. It was observed in the failing heart in animal models and in humans that there is a reduction in expression of SERCA2a at both the mRNA and protein level[33]. This led to nonclinical studies assessing the effectiveness of increased levels of SERCA2a in ameliorating the heart failure phenotype and then to the human clinical trials (CUPID 1 and 2) with a single intracoronary infusion of AAV1‐SERCA in HFrEF patients. Even though the CUPID trials failed to demon­strate an improvement in outcomes in HFrEF patients, another trial is underway
Table2.3  Clinical trials withAAV-mediated gene replacement therapy forheart disease.
Indication cDNA Capsid Sponsor
Danon Disease
Friedreich’s Ataxia
LAMP2B (lysosome‐ associated membrane protein 2B)
FXN (Frataxin)
AAV9 Rocket
AAVrh10 AAVrh10
Pharmaceuticals
Lexeo Therapeutics Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Clinical Phase NCT
Phase 1 NCT03882437
Phase 1/2 Phase 1
NCT05445323 NCT05302271
2 Recent Development in invivo Clinical Gene Therapy Platforms
https://t.me/medicina_free
48
with the same vector and route of administration, but with a higher dose (CUPID
3), Modulation of SERCA2a of Intra‐myocytic Calcium Trafficking in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction– Full Text View– ClinicalTrials.gov.
2.1.2.3  Clinical Trials for Hematologic and Metabolic Disease (Targeting the Liver)
A large number of trials are ongoing in which liver is the target organ for AAV delivery (Table 2.4). In certain instances, such as hemophilia A and B and Gaucher disease, the liver is used to produce and secrete an enzyme that functions outside of the liver. In other instances, PKU, Wilson’s disease, AAV delivery replaces a defective metabolic enzyme which functions within the liver.
2.1.2.4  Clinical Trials forSkeletal Muscle
Treating skeletal muscle disease that presents as a muscular dystrophy/myopathy (Table2.5).
2.1.3  Introduction: rAAV-as aVehicle forinvivo Gene Editing
One of the key limitations of canonical AAV delivery of a cDNA transgene is that the transgene exists in an episomal form that may not persist over time, particularly when delivered to very young patients with actively growing organs [37]. Additionally, many genetic diseases are caused by dominant mutations that cannot be corrected simply by ectopically expressing a wild‐type cDNA transgene. To over­come these limitations, numerous gene editing approaches have been attempted, with strong proof of principle in animal models, and in a few cases initiation of clinical trials [38]. For the discussion in this section, gene editing refers to any method designed to alter the chromosomal DNA invivo in a targeted fashion. These include passive methods that rely solely on cell‐based DNA repair machinery, such as homologous recombination methods, and methods actively catalyzed by site‐ directed nucleases, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFN) and CRISPR‐Cas systems.
2.1.3.1 Non-nuclease Mediated Methods
One method by which chromosomal DNA can be altered to correct a gene or insert a novel sequence is through homologous recombination, an approach that is relatively inefficient and requires cells to be in a mitotic state[39]. AAV is used as a DNA donor to carry a sequence with the desired chromosomal modification flanked by homology arms, which target this sequence to a precise chromosomal location. Recombination between the donor arms and the homologous endoge­nous sequence leads to replacement of the endogenous sequence with that tem­plated by the AAV vector[40, 41]. While this process can take place in the absence of exogenous nucleases, it can be enhanced by nucleases that create double‐strand breaks at the site of homology, as homology‐directed repair (HDR) is one pathway used by cells to repair double‐stranded breaks[42]. Homologous recombination
https://t.me/medicina_free