Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1382_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
Table 28.1. Underlying causes of Cushing’s syndrome
Proportion (%)
ACTH-dependent causes 80–85 Cushing’s disease 70 Ectopic ACTH syndrome 10 Unknown source of ACTH 5 ACTH-independent causes Up to 20 Adrenal adenoma 10 Adrenal carcinoma 5 Macronodular adrenal hyperplasia <2 Primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease <2 McCune–Albright syndrome <2
usually divided into the adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH)-dependent and ACTH-independent groups (Table 28.1). The ACTH-dependent group accounts for 80–85% of all cases of endo­genous hypercortisolism, and within this group, 80 and 20% can be attributed to pituitary (Cush­ing’s disease) and ectopic sources of ACTH respectively [13, 14]. Small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma followed by bronchial or thymic car­cinoids, and other neuroendocrine tumors such as pheochromocytoma, pancreatic neuroendo­crine tumors, and gastrointestinal carcinoids are common causesof ectopic ACTH syndromes. Patients suffering from small-cell carcinoma of lung frequently manifest diagnostic para­neoplastic wasting syndrome while, for other ectopic sources of ACTH, the clinical presenta­tion would be difficult to distinguish from Cush­ing’s disease. ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome is most commonly due to a unilateral functional adrenal adenoma, accounting for approximately 60% of cases while adrenal carci­noma accounts for the remaining cases. Bilateral adrenal masses such as ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (AIMAH) and primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease (PPNAD) are, albeit rarely, ACTH-independent causes of Cushing’s syndrome.
Clinical Features
A wide variety of symptoms and signs result from the metabolic effects of excessive gluco­corticoid production (Fig. 28.1). Table 28.2 summarizes the clinical manifestations of
380
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
Fig. 28.1. Characteristic appearance of a patient with Cush-
ing’s syndrome including moon face, truncal obesity, proximal muscle wasting, and buffalo hump.
Table 28.2. Clinical manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome
Signs and symptoms % Obesity or weight gain 95
Facial plethora 90 Rounded face 90 Decreased libido 90 Thin skin 85 Decreased linear growth in children 70–80 Menstrual irregularity 80 Hypertension 75 Hirsutism 75 Depression/emotional lability 70 Easy bruising 65 Glucose intolerance 60 Weakness 60 Osteopenia or fracture 50 Nephrolithiasis 50
381
CUSHING’S DISEASE AND SYNDROME
Cushing’s syndrome. However, some of these clinical features are neither specific nor fre­quently apparent at presentation. Diagnosis is challenging and depends on a high index of suspicion. In addition, patients with other meta­bolic syndromes frequently share various simi­lar, if not identical, clinical features [11]. Signs of protein wasting including the presence of thin skin in the young, easy bruising, and proximal muscle weakness could more reliably distinguish Cushing’s from metabolic syndrome [11]. In contrast, obesity and decreased linear growth are more common in children with Cushing’s syndrome[15, 16]. Patients typically havetruncal obesity with ‘‘moon face’’ (Fig. 28.2) and fullness of the supraclavicular fat pads (‘‘buffalo hump’’). There are also some differences in presentation between men and women. Purplish abdominal cutaneous striae, muscle atrophy, osteoporosis, and kidney stones more common in male patients [17]. Although gonadal or sexual dysfunction is common in both sexes, oligomenorrhea is a com­mon presentation in premenopausal women and may occur before other manifestations. Renal stones are present in about 50% of patients [18]. More than 70% of patients can present with psy­chiatric symptoms ranging from anxiety to frank
psychosis. Impairment of short-term memory or cognitive function is common [19] and is fre­quently associated with a reduction in apparent brain volume that slowly reverses after correction of hypercortisolism [20]. However, quality of life might remain impaired even after the resolution of hypercortisolism [21–23].
Metabolic manifestations are commonly pre­sented as laboratory abnormalities including hyperlipidiemia, impaired glucose tolerance test or diabetes, lymphocytopenia, eosinopenia, high hematocrit, and hemoglobulin as well as hyper­calciuria. Because of the precision of laboratory and imaging studies, Cushing’s syndrome is increasingly diagnosed earlier during its course and florid clinical or laboratory manifestations are becoming increasingly less apparent [11].
Investigations
Biochemical Evaluations
In principle, clinical suspicion of Cushing’s syn­drome should be confirmed by biochemical eva­luations. On the other hand, incidentally
Fig. 28.2. Facial appearance (moon face) of a young woman with Cushing’s syndrome due to an adrenal adenoma 1 year before
(A) and after surgical treatment (B).
382
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
detected adrenal mass should be evaluated for potential subclinical hypercortisolism. In addi­tion, high-risk patient groups such as those with poorly controlled diabetes and/or hypertension with overlapping clinical features should be subjected to routine biochemical screening. However, no single biochemical test is perfect for screening and several tests are usually neces­sary [8]. The currently accepted screening tests include 24 h urinary free cortisol, overnight/ low-dose dexamethasone-suppression test and assessment of late-night salivary cortisol [7].
Measurement of urinary cortisol is a direct measurement of circulating free or biologically active cortisol. Excess circulating cortisol satu­rates the corticosteroid-binding globulins and is excreted in urine as free cortisol. Unlike plasma cortisol, it is unaffected by factors that influence corticosteroid-binding globulins [24, 25]. Up to three 24 h urine collections should be per­formed to exclude intermittent hypercortiso­lism. Values greater than threefold the upper limit of normal are diagnostic [8] while milder elevation can be found in conditions such as chronic anxiety or major depression states (sti­mulate glucocorticoid secretion), chronic intake of drugs including barbiturates, phenytoin, rifampicin or alcohol (accelerate cortisol meta­bolism), and obesity as well as high estrogen states [10]. A normal value of urine cortisol (<135 nmol/24 h) excludes the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome with a high degree of accu­racy. However, to avoid a falsely low result, the total urinary volume and urine creatinine should be measured in all samples to ensure completeness of collection or urinary cortisol value adjusted with the creatinine clearance [8].
Both overnight and 48-h/low-dose dexa­methasone-suppression tests are used widely. The former test involves giving 1 mg dexametha­sone at 23:00 or midnight and then checking the serum concentration of cortisol at 08:00–09:00 the next morning. The latter test involves giving dexamethasone 0.5 mg every 6 hourly for 2 days and checking the cortisol level both at the start and at the end of the 48-h test. To exclude Cush­ing’s syndrome, the serum concentration of cor­tisol should be suppressed to less than 50 nmol/l (2 mg/dl) [26, 27]. The overnight test is a simple screening test but a false-positive rate of up to 30% has been reported in healthy individuals [28]. Patients with malabsorption or increased hepatic clearance of dexamethasone (e.g., those
taking carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbi­tol, or rifampicin) are more likely to have false­positive results [29]. The 48-h or low-dose dexamethasone test has a higher specificity and should be performed to confirm a positive over­night screening test [11]. Some 3–8% of patients with Cushing’s disease may retain sensitivity to dexamethasone and show suppression of serum cortisol on either test [30, 31].
Late-night salivary cortisol measurement is a recently introduced test with promising role for screening of Cushing’s syndrome. Cortisol con­centration in saliva highly correlates with free plasma cortisol and is independent of salivary flow rate [32, 33]. Late night (23:00) salivary cortisol is a simple way to screen for Cushing’s syndrome and has become increasingly used with a relatively high sensitivity and specificity of 95–98% [11]. It is particularly useful in inves­tigating patients with cyclical Cushing’s syn­drome by repeated measurements of evening cortisol over time [34].
Evaluation of the Etiological Causes
Once the diagnosis of hypercortisolism has been confirmed biochemically with hormonal eva­luations, the underlying cause should be sought.
Figure 28.3 shows the commonly adopted eva-
luation algorithm in establishing the underlying cause of Cushing’s syndrome. Measurement of plasma ACTH concentration should be con­sidered as the first step to provide potential important information. It is important that when taking blood for ACTH, the plasma should be separated rapidly and stored at –408Cto avoid degradation and a falsely low result. Undetectable or low ACTH concentrations less than 2 pmol/l (10 pg/ml) indicate ACTH-inde­pendent Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal causes should be sought. On the other hand, when ACTH concentrations are grossly elevated to greater than 4 pmol/l (20 pg/ml), ACTH­independent causes, Cushing’s disease or ecto­pic ACTH production, are likely. Values between these two limits need careful interpre­tation because patients with Cushing’s disease and adrenal pathologies might give rise to inter­mediate values.
MeasurementofACTHcouldnotfrequently arrive at the diagnosis and other hormonal evaluations are frequently required. When
383
CUSHING’S DISEASE AND SYNDROME
Fig. 28.3. CT scan of a patient with bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (A) and the bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy
specimens (B); MRI of a patient with primary pigmented nodular adrenal hyperplasia (C) and the bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy specimens (D).
ACTH-dependent causes of Cushing’s syn­drome are considered, distinguishing pituitary from nonpituitary sources of excess ACTH can be extremely challenging, but nevertheless, the distinction is important to guide definitive treatment [11, 35]. Biochemical assessment is more useful than imaging for differentiating between pituitary and nonpituitary cause because up to 40% of proven Cushing’s disease have normal pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) whereas those with nonpitui­tary cause could have a pituitary incidentaloma (although rarely larger than 6 mm in size) [36]. The high-dose dexamethasone-suppression test (in the form of 2-mg dose given every 6 h oronesingledoseof8-mgdoseat23:00)could partially suppress ACTH secretion from most pituitary adenomas (about 80%) and not for ectopic ACTH tumors. A suppression of corti­sol of more than 50% of basal level implies a
positive test result. However, occasionally benign tumors such as the carcinoid tumors of bronchus or thymus may still have a sup­pressed cortisol.
For patients with equivocal ACTH and high­dose dexamethasone-suppression test results, the corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test might also be useful because most pituitary tumors and only a few ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors respond to CRH administration. In this test, an intravenous bolus of either 1 mg/kg or more usually 100 mg is given to stimulate the corticotrope tumor cells in the pituitary gland to release ACTH, which, in turn, will raise the serum cortisol concentration. There is no consensus on the criteria adopted for interpreting a positive response to CRH sti­mulation in the test. Variability in the interpre­tation depends on the type of CRH used, the biochemical parameters measured (35–50%
384
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
increase of ACTH above baseline vs 14–20% increase of cortisol), and the evaluated time points (ACTH, 15–30 min vs cortisol, 15–45 min) after CRH injection [36–38]. How­ever, because some ectopic ACTH-producing tumors also show positive response to CRH stimulation, the specificity of the test cannot reach 100% despite increasing the cutoff level of the response [8].
Localization
If ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome is sus­pected based on ACTH measurement but the source of ACTH is nondiagnostic based on the high-dose dexamethasone-suppression and CRH stimulation tests, the next investigation of choice is the pituitary MRI. If both the clinical presentation and the dynamic biochemical stu­dies are compatible with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, an isolated lesion of 6 mm or more on pituitary MRI is almost diag­nostic of Cushing’s disease. However, up to 40% of patients with proven Cushing’s disease have normal pituitary MRI scans and up to 10% of the normal population has a pituitary inciden­taloma (usually 5 mm or less). In these patients, bilateral selective inferior petrosal sinus venous sampling to compare the gradient of ACTH with the periphery is the most reliable means of dis­criminating between pituitary and nonpituitary sources of ACTH. However, venous sampling is a highly operator-dependent, technically demanding, skilled, and invasive technique. A greater than 50% increase in central corticotro­phin level compared with basal or a central-to­peripheral ratio of more than 2–3:1 is consistent with Cushing’s disease when stimulated by CRH with a reported sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 95–100%, respectively [39–43]. In one study, 2 of 179 patients noted to have responses consistent with Cushing’s disease were ulti­mately confirmed to have ectopic ACTH syn­drome [44]. However, venous sampling has only 70% accuracy in lateralizing the source of ACTH within the pituitary gland in adults although the accuracy is much greater for children [8, 10, 45]. Direct sampling from the cavernous sinuses does not improve the accuracy. On the other hand, sampling from the internal jugular veins has been proposed as a simplified procedure but is associated with a lower sensitivity and specificity [46].
On the other hand, when ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome causes such as adrenal ade­noma, adrenocortical carcinoma, or AIMAH are considered, the anatomical cause is invariably visible on fine-cut CT scan or MRI. In PPNAD, the adrenal glands would appear normal in shape and size (Fig. 28.3). Since PPNAD is asso­ciated with Carney’s complex, other features of the complex such as lentigines or myxomas might help with the diagnosis. In ACTH-depen­dent Cushing’s syndrome, the adrenals may sometimes appear slightly enlarged and could cause some diagnostic confusion with a primary adrenal cause. In 30% of Cushing’s disease, the adrenals appear normal whereas in ectopic ACTH syndrome, the adrenals are homoge­neously enlarged [47]. When ectopic ACTH Cushing’s syndrome is suspected, axial imaging with thin-cut multislice CT of the thorax and abdomen has a high detection rate for the pri­mary tumors [13, 14, 48]. Patients harboring small neuroendocrine tumors which express somatostatin receptors can be localized by somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy. Although the scintigraphy may confirm functionality for a lesion seen on axial CT scan, its ability to disclose a truly occult tumor invisible on CT is limited [49, 50]. PET with benefit in locating ectopic ACTH-secreting neu­roendocrine tumors, although these tumors are usually of low metabolic activity [51, 52]. Use of
11
C-5-hydroxytryptophan has been proposed as a universal imaging technique for neuroendo­crine tumors but further evaluation is needed before its usefulness can be established [53].
Figure 28.4 summarizes the commonly adopted
evaluation protocol and management algorithm for patients with biochemical confirmed endo­genous hypercortisolism.
18
FDG may be of some
Management
Medications
Although the primary therapy for Cushing’s syndrome is surgical, medical treatment is fre­quently recommended for perioperative control of hypercortisolism or when surgery is not fea­sible. Metyrapone, ketoconazole, and mitotane have all been demonstrated to lower cortisol by inhibiting synthesis and secretion of the adrenal gland [11, 54]. The formertwo drugs are enzyme
385
CUSHING’S DISEASE AND SYNDROME
Fig. 28.4. Proposed algorithm for the workup and management protocol of patients with confirm endogenous hypercortisolism
(Abbreviations: CRH = corticotrophin-releasing hormone; AIMAH = ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia; PPNAD = primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease; BIPSS = bilateral inferior petrosal sinus venous sampling; HDDST = high-dose dexamethasone-suppression test).
inhibitors and have rapid onset of action, but are less effective for Cushing’s disease due to ACTH oversecretion (the so-called escape phe­nomenon) [11]. They are not effective for long­term control but are often used before or as an adjunct after surgery. Mitotane (p’DDD) acts as an adrenolytic drug with delayed onset but long-lasting action. In general, medical treat­ment can also be considered for patients unwill­ing or unfit for surgery [53]. However, all these drugs have gastrointestinal side effects and hepatocellular dysfunction is frequently noted for ketoconazole with occasional cases of hepa­tic failure described [55, 56].
High doses of peroxisomal proliferator-
activated receptor-g agonist, rosiglitazone, have been shown to reduce ACTH and cortisol levels in animal models, but its effectiveness in human is not consistent [57]. Mifepristone is the first potent glucocorticoid receptor antagonist and has limited experience on patients with Cushing’s
disease. However, due to its long half-life, signifi­cant adrenal insufficiency may result [58].
Surgery
Cushing’s Disease
Table 28.3 shows the immediate and long-term
outcomes of surgery for Cushing’s syndrome. Several series have shown the safety and favor­able long-term outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease [59–62]. Trans­sphenoidal surgery has the potential of achiev­ing selective microadenectomy of the causative corticotrope adenoma and leaving the remain­ing pituitary function intact. However, the remission rate ranges from 42 to 86% (<15% for macroadenomas) [11, 63]. These variations in remission rates are attributed to the differ­ences in surgical skills as well as controversy on the definition and characterization of
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
Table 28.3. Summary of surgical options and outcomes of surgical treatment for Cushing’s syndrome
Factors affecting outcomes
Etiology Preferred surgical option Outcomes
ACTH-dependent
Pituitary adenoma Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) - Similar survival as
normal population
- 50–60% in remission
Bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy
(failed TSS)
Ectopic ACTH
syndrome
ACTH-independent
Adrenal adenoma Laparoscopic adrenalectomy - Excellent
Adrenal carcinoma Open radical adrenalectomy - Poor - Completeness of tumor
Adrenal
hyperplasia
Resection of localized primary tumors - Good immediate
Bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy
(ACTH source not localized)
Bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy - Excellent - Risk of Addison’s crisis
- Low morbidity and mortality
- Improved quality of life
recovery
- Poor prognosis
- Effective palliation
- Similar survival as age-match controls
and long-term risk
- Preoperative ACTH levels
- ACTH response to CRH
- Tumor size or invasiveness
- Surgical experience
- Risk of hypopituitarism
- Risk of Addison’s crisis
- Nelson’s syndrome (0–10%)
- Accuracy of localization
- Presence of metastases
- Nature of primary tumors
- Presence of metastases
- Nature of occult ACTH source or primary tumor
- Risk of Addison’s crisis
resection
386
remission or persistent disease in the postopera­tive period. Larger, invasive, and moreaggressive tumors are associated with worse outcome [59, 62] whereas centers performing a large number of pituitary operations have improved outcomes and minimal morbidity. If there is clear persis­tent disease postoperatively, immediate reopera­tion has been advocated [64, 65]. Despite a clinical and biochemical remission as evident by secondary adrenal insufficiency, there is still a recurrence rate of 5–25% during follow-up [63]. Glucocorticoids replacement is required for patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency postoperatively until the hypothalamo–pituitar­y–adrenal axis recovers full activity usually 6–18 months after surgery. There can be deficiencies of other pituitary hormones (hypopituitarism) in up to 50% over a long follow-up period.
For those with failed initial transsphenoidal
surgery, bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy
can be an alternative [66–68]. It is considered to be a potential primary treatment modality for selected individuals with Cushing’s disease [66, 69]. This procedure is well tolerated with very little morbidity and a nearly 100% cure rate in patients with ACTH-dependent hypercortiso­lism. A recent study has found that those treated with bilateral adrenalectomy had equivalent quality of life as those cured by initial trans­sphenoidal surgery [68]. One major concern after bilateral adrenalectomy in patients with Cushing’s disease is the development of Nelson’s syndrome – a locally aggressive pitui­tary tumor that secretes high concentrations of ACTH (usually > 300 pg/ml) and results in skin pigmentation. For this reason, periodic MRI of the pituitary and measurement of basal ACTH are recommended after surgical treat­ment of Cushing’s disease by bilateral adrena­lectomy [7].
387
CUSHING’S DISEASE AND SYNDROME
Ectopic ACTH-Producing Tumors
Resection of ectopic ACTH-producing tumors is undoubtedly the most effective way to reverse the hypercortisolemia and to cure the Cushing’s syndrome. However, these tumors are not always amendable to complete or curative resection because of the frequent presence of metastases at presentation or the occult nature resulting in failure to locate the tumors. In these situations, either medical therapy or bilateral adrenalectomy should be employed. Bilateral adrenalectomy offers a rapid resolution of the hypercortisolism with minimal morbidity [69–71] and is increasingly being adopted.
Adrenal Causes
For unilateral cortisol-producing adrenal ade­noma or carcinoma, unilateral adrenalectomy should be performed and laparoscopic approach has become the procedure of choice for benign adenomas [69, 72–75] (Fig. 28.5). Prognosis after removal of an adenoma is gen­erally excellent [67, 76], but in contrast, if the tumor is malignant, the overall prognosis is poor. There remains controversy in adopting the laparoscopic approach for large, potentially malignant, or malignant adrenal mass. Open resection is generally recommended for frankly malignant adrenocortical carcinoma because of the potential increased risk of recurrence following laparoscopic approach [77, 78] For selected cases where conversion from
laparoscopic adrenalectomy is required, the hand-assist technique may be utilized. In bilat­eral adrenal causes of Cushing’s syndrome such as PPNAD and AIMAH, patients will benefit from bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The prognosis is generally excellent because both diseases are benign in nature [79].
Patients undergoing bilateral adrenalect­omy will require life-long glucocorticoid as well as mineralocorticoid therapy and are at risk of having Addisonian crisis. Careful peri­operative steroid replacement is essential and mineralocorticoid supplementation with flu­drocortisone should be commenced at the same time when the patient is ready for oral intake. Stress-dose steroid supplementation (100 mg hydrocortisone intravenously every 8 h) should be administered in all patients and changed to oral form when diet has been resumed. The dosage can also be adjusted to a replacement dose (hydrocortisone or cortisone 20mga.m.and10mgp.m.)graduallyafterthe operation. Even for unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal adenoma or carcinoma, periopera­tive steroid cover should be administered and, in addition, steroid supplementation is required for 6–12 months after adrenalectomy for the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis of the contralateral suppressed adrenal gland to recover. In addition, patients with Cushing’s syndrome are at increased risk of wound infec­tion because of immunosuppression and should receive a single dose of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
Fig. 28.5. CT scan showing a 3-cm adrenal adenoma in a patient with biochemically confirmed Cushing’s syndrome (A) and the
resected adrenal gland revealing a typical golden-yellow adrenal adenoma (B).
388
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
Conclusions
Cushing’s syndrome is a well-recognized dis­ease entity with heterogenous clinical presenta­tion and underlying etiologies. The diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism is challenging and depends on a high index of clinical suspi­cion. Biochemical confirmation of the disease and hormonal evaluation of the underlying causes should be systematically performed fol­lowed by an accurate anatomical localization of the pathology. Treatment is primarily targeting at removing the causative pathology responsible for the hypercortisolism with an aim of long­term cure. Perioperative steroid cover is essential for patients with Cushing’s syndrome under­going surgical treatment. With surgical advances and improved perioperative care, patients with hypercortisolism can undergo surgical treatment with minimal risk and long-term cure.
References
1. Lindholm J, Juul S,Jorgensen JO, Astrup J, Bjerre Pet al. Incidence and late prognosis of Cushing’s syndrome: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(1):117–23.
2. Reincke M. Subclinical Cushing’ssyndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2000;29:43–56.
3. Sippel RS, Chen H. Subclinical Cushing’s syndrome in adrenalincidentalomas. SurgClinN Am. 2004;84:875–85.
4. Catargi B, Rigalleau V, Poussin A, Ronci-Chaix N, Bex V, Vergnot V, Gin H, Roger P, Tabarin A. Occult Cush­ing’s syndrome in type-2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5808–5813.
5. Leibowitz G, Tsur A, Chayen SD, Salameh M, Raz I. Cerasi E, Gross DJ. Pre-clinical Cushing’s syndrome: an unexpected frequent cause of poor glycaemic control in obese diabetic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996;44:717–722.
6. Plotz CM, Knowlton AI, Ragan C. The natural history of Cushing’s syndrome. Am J Med. 1952;13(5):597–614.
7. Findling JW, Raff H. Clinical review: Cushing’s syn­drome: Important issues in diagnosis and management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3746–3753.
8. Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB, Bertagna A et al. Diagnosis and complications of Cushing’s syndrome: a consenus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5593–5602.
9. Findling JW, Raff H. Screening and diagnosis of Cush­ing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2005;34:385–402.
10. Newell-PriceJ,TrainerP,BesserM,GrossmanA.Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and pseudo-Cushing’s states. Endocr Rev. 1998;19:647–672.
11. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006;367:1605–17.
12. Tran HA, Petrovsky N. Difficulties in excluding Cush­ing’s syndrome in obese subjects. Endocrinologist. 2006;16:15–19.
13. Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Pozza C, et al. The ectopic adrenocorticotrophin syndrome: clinical features, diag­nosis, management and long-term follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:371–77.
14. Wajchenberg BL, Mendonca BB, Liberman B, et al. Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome. Endocr Rev. 1994;15:752–87.
15. Giustina A, WehrenbergWB. The role of glucocorticoids in the regulation of growth hormone secretion. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1992;3:306–311.
16. Lebrethon MC, Grossman AB, Afshar F, Plowman PN, Besser GM, Savage MO. Linear growth and final height after treatmentfor Cushing’sdisease in childhood.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3262–3265.
17. Pecori Giraldi F, Moro M, Cavagnini F. Gender-related differences in the presentation and course of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;8:1554–58.
18. Faggiano A, Pivonello R, Melis D, et al. Nephrolithiasis in Cushing’s disease: prevalence, etiopathogenesis, and modification after disease cure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2076–80.
19. Forget H, Lacroix A, Cohen H. Persistent cognitive impairment following surgical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002;27:367–83.
20. Bourdeau I, Bard C, Noel B,et al.Loss ofbrain volumein endogenous Cushing’s syndrome and its reversibility after correction of hypercortisolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1949–54.
21. Lindsay JR, Nansel T, Baid S, Gumowski J, Nieman LK. Long-term impaired quality of life in Cushing’s syn­drome despite initial improvement after surgical remis­sion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:447–53.
22. Heald AH, Ghosh S, Bray S, et al. Long-term negative impact on quality of life in patients with successfully treated Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004;61:458–65.
23. van Aken MO, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, et al. Quality of life in patients after long-term biochemical cure of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90:3279–86.
24. Kaye TB, Crapo L. The Cushing syndrome: an update on diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:434–44.
25. Boscaro M, Barzon L, Sonino N The diagnosis of Cush­ing’s syndrome: atypical presentations and laboratory shortcomings. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3045–3053.
26. Findling JW, Raff H. Newer diagnostic techniques and problems in Cushing’s disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1999;28:191–210.
27. Wood PJ, Barth JH, Freedman DB, Perry L, Sheridan B. Evidence for the low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen forCushing’s syndromerecommendations for a protocol for biochemistry laboratories. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;34:222–229.
28. Crapo L. Cushing’s syndrome: a review of diagnostic tests. Metabolism. 1979; 28:955–77.
29. Putignano P, Kaltsas GA, Satta MA, Grossman AB. The effects of anti-convulsant drugs on adrenal function. Horm Metab Res. 1998;30:389–97.
30. Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Mohammed S, et al. Discrimi­natory value of the low-dose dexamethasone suppres­sion test in establishing the diagnosis and differential
389
CUSHING’S DISEASE AND SYNDROME
diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5299–306.
31. Findling JW, Raff H, Aron DC. The low-dose dexa­methasone suppression test: a reevaluation in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:1222–26.
32. Raff H, Raff JL, Findling JW. Late-night salivary cortisol as a screening test for Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endo­crinol Metab. 1998;83:2681–86.
33. Castro M, Elias PC, Quidute AR, Halah FP, Moreira AC. Out-patient screening for Cushing’s syndrome: the sen­sitivity of the combination of circadian rhythm and overnight dexamethasone suppression salivary cortisol tests. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:878–82.
34. Yaneva M,Mosnier-Pudar H, DugueMA, GrabarS, Fulla Y, Bertagna X. Midnight salivary cortisol for the initial diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome of various causes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 3345–51.
35. Grossman AB, Kelly P, Rockall A, Bhattacharya S, McNi­col A, Balwick T. Cushing’s syndrome caused by an occult source: difficultiesin diagnosis and management. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2:642–7.
36. Invitti C, Pecori Giraldi F, de Martin M, Cavagnini F. Diagnosis and management of Cushing’s syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophy­siology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:440–48.
37. Newell-Price J, Morris DG, Drake WM, Korbonits M, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB. Optimal response criteria for the human CRH test in the differ­ential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syn­drome. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2002;87:1640–45.
38. Nieman LK, Oldfield EH, Wesley R, Chrousos GP, Lor­iaux DL, Culter Jr GB. A simplified morning ovine cor­ticotrope-releasing hormone stimulation test for the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotrope-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:1308–12.
39. Colao A, Faggiano A, Pivonello R, Giraldi FP, Cavagnini F, Lombardi G. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the differ­ential diagnosisof Cushing’ssyndrome:resultsofan Italian multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;144:499–507.
40. Kaltsas GA, Giannulis MG, Newell-Price JD, et al. A critical analysis of the value of simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing’s disease and the occult ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:487–492.
41. Findling JW, Kehoe ME, Shaker JL, Raff H. Routine infer­ior petrosal sinus sampling in the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syn­drome: early recognition of the occult ectopic ACTH syn­drome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:408–413.
42. Doppman JL, Oldfield E, Krudy AG, et al. Petrosal sinus sampling for Cushing syndrome: anatomical and tech­nical considerations. Work in progress. Radiology. 1984;150:99–103.
43. Oldfield EH, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, et al. Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releas­ing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:897–905.
44. Swearingen B, Katznelson L, Miller K, et al. Diagnostic errors after inferior petrosal sinus sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3752–63.
45. Lienhardt A, Grossman AB, Dacie JE, et al. Relative contributions of inferior petrosal sinus sampling and pituitary imaging in the investigation of children and adolescents with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syn­drome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5711–14.
46. Erickson D, Huston J 3rd, Young WF Jr, et al. Internal jugular vein sampling in adrenocorticotropic hormone­dependent Cushing’s syndrome: a comparison with inferior petrosal sinus sampling. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004;60:413–19.
47. Sohaib SA, Hanson JA, Newell-Price JD, et al. CT appearance of the adrenal glands in adrenocortico­trophic hormone-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:997–1002.
48. IliasI,TorpyDJ,PacakK,MullenN,WesleyRA,Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty year’s experience at the National Insti­tutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:4955–62.
49. Lamberts SW, deHerder WW,Krenning EP,Reubi JC.A role of (labeled) somatostatin analogs in the differential diagnosis and treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:17–19.
50. Phlipponneau M, Nocaudie M, Epelbaum J, et al. Soma­tostatin analogs for the localization and preoperative treatment of an adrenocorticotropin-secreting bron­chial carcinoid tumor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:20–24.
51. Pacak K, Ilias I, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Nieman LK. The role of [(18)F]fl uorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and [(111)In]-diethyle­netriaminepentaacetate-D-Phepentetreotide scintigra­phy in the localization of ectopic adrenocorticotropin­secreting tumors causing Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2214–21.
52. Kumar J, Spring M, Carroll PV, Barrington SF, Powrie
18
Flurodeoxyglucose positron mission tomography
JK. in the localization of ectopic ACTH-secreting neuroen­docrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (oxf). 2006;64:371–4.
53. Orlefors H, Sundin A, Garske U, et al. Whole-body (11)C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomo­graphy as a universalimaging technique forneuroendo­crine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and computed tomography. J Clin Endo­crinol Metab. 2005;90:3392–400.
54. Sonino N, Boscaro M, Fallo F. Pharmacologic manage­ment of Cushing’s syndrome: new targets for therapy. Treat Endocrinol. 2005;4:87–94.
55. Lewis JH, Zimmerman HJ, Benson GD, Ishak KG. Hepa­tic injury associated with ketoconazole therapy: analysis of 33 cases. Gastroenterology. 1984;86:503–513.
56. Nieman LK. Medicaltherapy of Cushing’s disease. Pitui­tary. 2002;5:77–82.
57. Giraldi FP, Scaroni C, Arvat E, Martin M, Giordano R, Albiger N, Leao AA, Picu A, Mantero F, Cavagnini F. Effect of protracted treatment with rosiglitazone, a PPAR_ agonist, in patients with Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;64:219–224.
58. Chu JW, Matthias DF, Belanoff J,Schatzberg A,Hoffman AR, Feldman D. Successful long-term treatment of refractory Cushing’s diseasewith highdosemifepristone (RU 486). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3568–3573.
59. Mampalam TJ, Tyrrell JB, Wilson CB Transsphenoidal microsurgery for Cushing disease.A report of 216 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:487–493.