Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3865_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
320 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
•
D-dimer is elevated during acute VTE but conditions such as cancer, sepsis, surgery, trauma, pregnancy, myocardial infarction, bleeding, inflammation, and other systemic illnesses can also cause elevation.
•
D-dimer is an effective “rule out” of VTE in the setting of low clinical pretest probability, but a positive result requires further diagnostic verification. Table 13-4 describes how to estimate pretest probability using Wells Pretest Probabil ity scoring.
•
There are many different D-dimer assays, and the sensitivity of D-dimer is depen­dent on the assay method; no universal cutoff level exists.
•
Sensitivity of D-dimer may be reduced if the duration of signs and symptoms of VTE exceed 2–3 days or if the patient has received heparin therapy.
5
Role of Duplex Ultrasonography (with Compression) in Establishing the Diagnosis of DVT
•
It is preferred to venography because it is noninvasive and does not carry the side effects of venography (i.e., hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, vessel wall irritation, nephrotoxicity due to the contrast medium).
•
Positive duplex ultrasound in combination with moderate-to-high pretest probability scoring, or a positive D-dimer can be used to confirm the diagnosis (see Table 13-4).
•
Negative testing does not exclude DVT, particularly in calf veins.
•
The ability to diagnose new DVT can be difficult in patients with previous history of DVT.
-
Role of Pretest Probability Scoring
The Wells Score is a clinical prediction tool that can aid in the diagnosis of DVT. This score, when used in combination with other clinical assessments, can guide clinicians toward which patients require further testing to either confirm or rule out DVT. However, like most prediction rules, this scoring system performs variably in different patient populations and should not replace clinical judgment (see Table 13-4).
See Figure 13-5 on how to use Wells Pretest Probability Scoring to aid
in DVT diagnosis.
• Further diagnostic testing is not necessary in patients with low pretest probability score for DVT and a negative D-dimer.
DVT Diagnostic Algorithms
See Figures 13-5A-C.
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM TREATMENT 321
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 13-4: Wells Pretest Probability Scoring for Deep Vein
Thrombosis
Clinical Features Score
Tenderness along entire deep vein system 1
Swelling of the entire leg 1
Greater than 3-cm difference in calf circumference 1
Pitting edema 1
Collateral superficial veins 1
Risk factors:
•
Active cancer Prolonged immobility or paralysis
•
•
Recent surgery or major medical illness
Alternative diagnosis likely –2
Total
≥3: high probability, 1–2: moderate probability, ≤0: low probability Source: Adapted from Wells PS, et al. Lancet. 1997.
6
1 1 1
322 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
High or moderate sensive D-dimer
Negave
No DVT
Posive
Proximal US
Negave
No DVT
Posive
Treat DVT
FIGURE 13-5A. Diagnosis Algorithms for DVT, Low Probability
The following diagram summarizes the current recommendations for the diagnosis of DVT based on a low pretest probability. In these patients, the initial diagnostic test is a moderate or high sensitive D-dimer initially, followed by ultrasound testing only if the result of the D-dimer test is positive.
4
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM TREATMENT 323
https://t.me/med1917
High sensive
D-dimer
Negave
No DVT
Negave
Proximal US
Negave
Repeat
Proximal US in
1 week
Posive
Posive
Treat DVT
Posive
FIGURE 13-5B. Diagnosis Algorithms for DVT, Moderate
Probability
The following diagram summarizes the current recommendations for the diagnosis of DVT based on a moderate pre-test probability. In these patients, using a high sensitive D-dimer initially is recommended, followed by ultrasound only if the result of the D-dimer test is positive. In the case of a negative initial ultrasound, the test should be repeated in 1 week to confirm the absence of DVT.
DVT: deep vein thrombosis, US: ultrasound
No DVT
4
Treat DVT
324 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
Proximal US
Negave
No DVT
Repeat
Proximal US in
1 week
Posive
Treat DVT
Negave
Negave
No DVT
Highly
sensive
D-dimer
Negave
No DVT
Posive
Treat DVT
Posive
Repeat
Proximal US in
1 week
Posive
Treat DVT
FIGURE 13-5C. Diagnosis Algorithms for DVT, High Probability
The following diagram summarizes the current recommendations for the diagnosis of DVT based on a high pretest probability. In these patients, initial ultrasound is recommended; however, the highly sensitive D-dimer test is recommended if the initial ultrasound is negative.
4
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM TREATMENT 325
https://t.me/med1917
DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM
Signs and Symptoms of Pulmonary Embolism
Table 13-5 describes the many signs and symptoms associated with PE. Note that most of these signs and symptoms are nonspecific to PE, which helps explain why the diagnosis of PE is often challenging and requires careful clinical judgment.
TABLE 13-5: Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
Three Most Common Signs/Symptoms
Dyspnea Pleuritic chest pain with clear x-ray Tachypnea
Additional Signs and Symptoms
Apprehension Cough Cyanosis Diaphoresis ECG findings: right bundle branch block, SIQIIITIII, and T wave inversions in leads V1-V4 Elevated neck veins Fever Hemoptysis Hypotension Increased pulmonic component (P2) of the second heart sound Nonpleuritic chest pain Pleural rub Rales Syncope Systolic murmur (tricuspid regurgitation) Tachycardia Wheezing
Signs/Symptoms of Massive PE
Hemodynamic instability: The presence of shock or hypotension, specifically defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or a >40 mm Hg drop in blood pressure for >15 minutes Cardiac arrest Cyanosis Hypoxia Oliguria
5
Cardiac and Imaging Signs/Symptoms of Massive PE
Greater than 50% or more absent perfusion of the lung on angiography or ventilation/perfusion scanning Echocardiography: Evidence of RV failure/strain (RV enlargement, hypokinesis, pulmonary hypertension, intraventricular septal flattening or “bowing”) Elevated pulmonary artery pressure Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) Elevated troponin
326 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
• Similar to patients with DVT, patients with PE often present with atypical symptoms or may also present with asymptomatic disease.
Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostic Testing
Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography
•
Considered first-line choice for use in diagnosis unless contraindications exist.
•
Contrast dye is typically used, which can make the test unsuitable for patients with poor renal function.
•
Positive scan results for a PE have good specificity and generally confirm the diagnosis.
•
Negative scans lack sensitivity and may require further diagnostic studies if PE seems likely due to pretest probability scoring and/or D-dimer results.
•
Both sensitivity and specificity of the scan is improved with central clots as to those that are more peripheral.
•
Scan must be performed well technically including appropriate timing from contrast injection, patient holding his or her breath for about 20 seconds, and optimized spatial resolution parameter settings.
•
False positives are more common for segmental/subsegmental embolism, and follow-up testing may be needed.
A saddle PE is a large bilateral PE because anatomically the thrombi straddles the bifurcation of the main pulmonary artery and often extends into the left and right main pulmonary artery. Approximately 3–6% of patients with PE will be diagnosed with saddle PE.
See Figure 13-6 for an example of a saddle PE on computed tomography
(CT).
Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scan
•
Highly positive scan results for a PE have good specificity and can help confirm the diagnosis.
•
Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scanning is often preferred in patients with pregnancy, renal insufficiency, or allergies to contrast dye.
•
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and congestive heart failure can impair the specificity of the scan.
•
A negative scan has good specificity and generally rules out the diagnosis.
•
A nondiagnostic (intermediate or low radiologic probability scan) result lacks sensitivity and requires further diagnostic studies if PE seems likely.
See Figure 13-7 for sample V/Q scan.
Pulmonary Embolism Pretest Probability Scoring
Much like in DVT, a Wells Score is also available to estimate the probability of PE. This score, when used in combination with other clinical assess­ments, can guide clinicians toward which patients require further testing to
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM TREATMENT 327
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 13-6. CT of a Saddle Pulmonary Embolism
Source: Used with permission from Wikicommons7 https://commons. (https://upload. wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/SADDLE_PE.JPG)
FIGURE 13-7. Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scan of a Pulmonary
Embolism
Panel A shows good ventilation of the lung, while panel B shows poor blood perfusion to the right upper lobe, right lower lobe, and left lower lobe. This patient had a PE.
Source: Used with permission from Wikimedia commons. https://commons.wikimedia. org/wiki/File:Pulmonary_embolism_scintigraphy_PLoS.png
8
328 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
either confirm or rule out PE. Like most prediction rules, this scoring system performs variably in different patient populations and should not replace clinical judgment. It is most likely to be useful in situations of suspected PE without hypotension/shock (see Table 13-6).
TABLE 13-6: Wells Pretest Probability Scoring for Pulmonary
Embolism
Clinical Features Score Simplified Score
Clinical signs of DVT 3 1
PE as likely or more likely than alternative diagnosis 3 1
Heart rate >100 beats/min 1.5 1
Immobilization or surgery in the previous 4 weeks or surgery or fracture within past month
Previous DVT or PE 1.5 1
Hemoptysis 1 1
Cancer 1 1
Total
Wells criteria: >6 = high probability, 2–6 = moderate probability, <2 = low probability. Simplified Wells criteria: ≥ 2 = PE likely, 0–1 = PE unlikely DVT: deep vein thrombosis, PE: pulmonary embolism
See Figures 13-8 A and B for use of pretest probability scoring in the diagnosis of PE.
9,10
1.5 1
Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostic Algorithms
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM TREATMENT 329
https://t.me/med1917
Assess clinical
probability of PE
Negave
No treatment
Low/intermediate clinical probability
D-dimer
CT angiography
No PE
Posive
PE confirmed
No PE
No treatment
High clinical
probability
CT angiography
PE confirmed
Treat PE
FIGURE 13-8A. Diagram for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary
Embolism and No Shock*
*Shock is defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or a >40 mm Hg drop in blood pressure for >15 minutes.
Source: Adapted with permission from European Heart Journal, from Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:3033-3069, 3069a-3069k. Copyright © 2014 by European Society of Cardiology. Reproduced with permission of Oxford University; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
No treatment
Treat PE