Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3865_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
300 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
2.5 mg
twice daily,
initiated
12–24 hr
after surgery
10 mg once
daily initiated
6–10 hr after
surgery
110 mg initiated
1–4 hr after
surgery, then
220 mg once
daily*
Initiated pre-
operatively or the
evening of the
surgical day with
adjusted-dosing to
achieve a target INR
of 2.5 ± 0.5
2.5 mg
twice daily,
initiated
12–24 hr
after surgery
10 mg once
daily initiated
6–10 hr after
surgery
110 mg initiated
1–4 hr after
surgery, then
220 mg once
daily
Initiated pre-
operatively or the
evening of the
surgical day with
adjusted-dosing to
achieve a target INR
of 2.5 ± 0.5
Insufficient
evidence
Insufficient
evidence
Insufficient
evidence
Initiated pre-
operatively or the
evening of the
surgical day with
adjusted-dosing to
achieve a target INR
of 2.5 ± 0.5
2.5 mg sub-Q q
24 hr initiated
6–8 hr after
surgery
VTE Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Surgery
75 units/kg sub-Q
q 24 hr initiated
the evening
prior to surgery
or 12–24 after
2,500 units sub-Q
given 6–8 hr after
surgery, then 5,000
units sub-Q q 24 hr*
Enoxaparin Dalteparin Tinzaparin Fondaparinux Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban
30 mg sub-Q q
12 hr initiated
12–24 hr after
surgery
Orthopedic
Indication
Knee
replacement
TABLE 12-12: VTE Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Surgery
surgery
2.5 mg sub-Q q
surgery*
75 units/kg sub-Q
2,500 units sub-Q
30 mg sub-Q q
Hip
24 hr initiated
6–8 hr after
surgery
q 24 hr initiated
the evening prior
to surgery or 12–
given 4–8 hr after
surgery, then 5,000
units sub-Q q 24 hr
12 hr initiated
12–24 hr after
surgeryor40 mg sub-Q q
replacement
surgery
2.5 mg sub-Q q
24 hr initiated
24 hr after surgery*or4500 units sub-Q
q 24 hr initiated 12
hr prior to surgery*
evidence
or
5,000 units sub-Q
q 24 hr initiated the
evening prior to
surgery
Insufficient evidence Insufficient
24 hr initiated
10–12 hr prior
to surgery
30 mg sub-Q q
12 hr initiated
Hip fracture
surgery
6–8 hr after
surgery
12–24 hr after
surgery*
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PREVENTION 301
Pharmacologic prophylaxis is generally not recommended unless patients have addition risk factors of advanced age, malignancy, neurologic deficit,
previous VTE, or an anterior surgical approach. Based on the lack of clinical trials, pharmacologic prophylaxis recommendations are general and include
LMWH: low molecular weight heparin, q: every, sub-Q: subcutaneous, UFH: unfractionated heparin, units: International Units, VTE: venous thromboembolism
*Not approved by the U.S. FDA.
https://t.me/med1917
VTE Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Surgery
Enoxaparin Dalteparin Tinzaparin Fondaparinux Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban
Orthopedic
Indication
TABLE 12-12: (Continued)
sub-Q UFH or a LMWH.
Spine
surgery
302 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
• Dabigatran is now available in the United States for VTE prevention in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery, but not for knee replacement surgery. Dabigatran was found to be inferior to enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery.
• Rivaroxaban has demonstrated a superior reduction in VTE events compared to enoxaparin 40 mg once daily in hip replacement surgery and enoxaparin 40 mg once daily and enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily in knee replacement surgery. Although major bleeding was not significantly increased in these studies, it should be noted that the definition of major bleeding did not include surgical site bleeding (considered non-major bleeding).
Apixaban has demonstrated a superior reduction
• in VTE events compared to enoxaparin 40 mg once daily in hip and knee replacement surgery with no significant increase in major bleeding. Apixaban was not non-inferior to enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily in knee replacement surgery, although the event rates were similar (9% apixaban vs. 8.8% enoxaparin). difference in major bleeding was observed, the combination of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was significantly reduced with the use of apixaban.
21
22
Although no
22
• Timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis after surgery is an important and complicated issue. The risk of thromboembolic events begins immediately after surgery; therefore, VTE prophylaxis is generally more effective when started earlier rather than later. The challenge comes in that early VTE prophylaxis is also associated with increased bleeding compared to VTE prophylaxis started later.
• Initiation of VTE prophylaxis after elective spinal surgery can typically start 12-24 hours post­operatively. Prophylaxis may need to be delayed if the surgical site remains open.
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PREVENTION 303
https://t.me/med1917
• The frequency and severity of complications using non-neuraxial techniques (plexus or peripheral delivery) are influenced by the size of the catheter and degree of anticoagulation. The most serious complication from excessive anticoagulation using non-neuraxial techniques appears to be blood loss rather than loss of neural function.
VTE Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients
See Table 12-13.
TABLE 12-13: VTE Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients
Critical Care Setting
UFH LMWH Fondaparinux
VTE Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients
Trauma Insufficient evidence Dalteparin 5,000 units
Acute spinal cord injury
Burns 5,000 units sub-Q q 8
Critical care 5,000 units sub-Q q 8
HIT: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, sub-Q: subcutaneous, units: International Units, VTE: venous thromboembolism
5,000 units sub-Q q 8 hr Enoxaparin 30 mg
23
hr or 5,000 units sub-Q q 12 hr
hr or 5,000 units sub-Q q 12 hr
sub-Q q 24 hr or Enoxaparin 30 mg sub-Q q 12 hr
sub-Q q 12 hr or Enoxaparin 40 mg sub-Q q 24 hr
Dalteparin 5,000 units sub-Q q 24 hr or Enoxaparin 40 mg sub-Q q 24 hr
Dalteparin 5,000 units sub-Q q 24 hr Enoxaparin 30 mg sub-Q q 12 hr or Enoxaparin 40 mg sub-Q q 24 hr
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence
2.5 mg sub-Q daily may be an option in suspected HIT
304 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
• Trauma





Meta-analysis has demonstrated UFH to be no more effective than control.
24
Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily has demonstrated better efficacy to UFH 5,000 units twice daily.
25
Evidence for dalteparin is based on observational data.
Pharmacologic prophylaxis can be safely started within 24 to 36 hours. Patients with acute spinal cord injury may need to be delayed for 48 to 72 hours.
Patients with severe trauma (injury severity score >23) may present with antithrombin deficiency; therefore, sub-Q prophylaxis may be insufficient.
26
Although not prospectively evaluated, an option may be to use an UFH infusion while the patient is in the intensive care unit early in the course of events. Only a slight bump in the aPTT (35–45 seconds) would be targeted since VTE prevention is the goal.
• Acute spinal cord injury

UFH three times daily demonstrated similar rates of DVT and bleeding compared to enoxaparin twice daily, but there was a significant reduction in PE with enoxaparin.

While enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily should
27
be used during the acute injury period (about 2–3 weeks), either regimen could be used during the rehabilitation period.

In a retrospective case-control study, dalteparin 5,000 units daily failed to demonstrate non-inferiority to enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily in prevention of VTE (9.7% vs. 1.6%).
28
dalteparin and tinzaparin are warranted.
Further investigations of
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PREVENTION 305
https://t.me/med1917
• Burns

The recent evidence in burn patients currently comes from only observational studies with UFH, enoxaparin, and dalteparin. The most commonly used regimen is UFH 5,000 units sub-Q every 12 hours.
•
Critical care

In medically ill or post-operative general surgery patients, UFH or a LMWH can be used. In orthopedic surgery or trauma, a LMWH is preferred.

If mechanical prophylaxis is selected due to high risk of bleeding, the patient should be frequently re-evaluated and switched to pharmacologic prophylaxis when the bleeding risk decreases.

Some pharmacodynamic studies suggest that critical care patients with significant edema or receiving vasopressors may not achieve detectable anti-Xa levels with LMWH.

In the largest trial of VTE prevention in critical care patients, dalteparin 5,000 units sub-Q once daily provided similar protection against proximal DVT, better protection against PE, similar bleeding, and less HIT compared to UFH 5,000 units twice daily.

Dalteparin has been shown to not have significant accumulation in critical care patients with renal insufficiency.

A retrievable IVC filter may be considered
30
for PE prophylaxis, but it should be noted that this practice has limited evidence and is controversial. See the IVC discussion earlier in this chapter.
29
306 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
Travel Prophylaxis Strategies
See Table 12-14.
TABLE 12-14: Travel Prophylaxis Strategies
Indications Persons with previous VTE, thrombophilic disorders, severe obesity,
recently active cancer, pregnancy, estrogen use, advanced age, or recent major surgery or trauma, who are traveling on flights >6 hr
Non-pharmacological Hydration
Pharmacological LMWH before takeoff on the outgoing and return flights
LMWH: low molecular weight heparin, VTE: venous thromboembolism
In-route exercises
Foot lifts: Place your heels on the floor, and bring your toes up as
• high as you can. Then put both feet back flat on the floor. Then pull your heels up while keeping the balls of your feet on the floor.
• Ankle turns: Lift your feet off the floor and move your toes in a circle, one foot moving clockwise and the other foot moving counterclockwise. Change direction and repeat direction.
Frequent travel breaks every 1–2 hr Avoid restrictive clothing (tight clothes, belts, etc.) Avoid or limit alcohol and caffeine prior to travel Airline, bus, or train aisle seating Graduated compression devices
•    Below knee compression devices with ≥15–30 
mmHg graduated pressure are recommended for travel prophylaxis.
• Compression devices should be placed 3–4 hours before departure and removed upon arrival.
• Pharmacological therapy should be administered 2–4 hours prior to departure.
•
The ACCP provides a recommendation (Grade
2C) against the use of LMWH in this setting. Contrary to this recommendation, some will give a single prophylactic dose of LMWH. The only trial mentioned in the ACCP guidelines that used a LMWH gave sub-Q enoxaparin 1 mg/kg.
• Aspirin has been shown to be ineffective in this setting.
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PREVENTION 307
https://t.me/med1917
Duration of VTE Prophylaxis
See Table 12-15.
TABLE 12-15: Duration of VTE Prophylaxis
Indication Duration
General medically ill patients LMWH/UFH: 6–14 days as long as immobile during
Major general surgery Until hospital discharge
Major general surgery in patients with previous venous thromboembolism
Surgery for gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or gynecologic cancer
Total knee replacement surgery At least 10 days
Total hip replacement surgery 4 to 6 weeks*
Hip fracture surgery 4 to 6 weeks*
Critical care patients For the duration of the intensive care unit stay, with
Major trauma Until hospital discharge and continued prophylaxis in
Spinal cord injury patients Until hospital discharge in patients with incomplete
acute illness; betrixaban: 35–42 days
Beyond hospital discharge for up to 28 days
Beyond hospital discharge for up to 28 days
re-evaluation when the patient is transferred to the general medical ward
patients with impaired mobility who undergo inpatient rehabilitation (up to 8 weeks)
injuries For 8 weeks in patients with uncomplicated complete motor injury For 12 weeks or discharge from rehabilitation in patients with complete motor injury and other risk factors
*While the average time from surgery to VTE in knee replacement surgery is 7 days, the average time to VTE with hip procedures is delayed to 17 days.
Pharmacological Prophylaxis in Special Populations
Severe Renal Insufficiency
•
Patients with renal insufficiency are at higher risk of bleeding regardless of the anticoagulant used.
•
Patients with a serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL have been excluded from most clinical trials.
•
Enoxaparin should be dosed at 30 mg sub-Q once daily regardless of the indica­tion with CrCl <30 mL/min.
•
Dalteparin and tinzaparin do not seem to significantly accumulate in patients with severe renal insufficiency when prophylaxis doses are used.
31
308 Anticoagulation Therapy
https://t.me/med1917
•
Fondaparinux, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban are contraindicated in patients with a CrCl <30 mL/min. Apixaban should not be used in patients with a CrCl <25 mL/min.
•
Patients on hemodialysis (renal failure) should receive sub-Q UFH.
Obesity
•
ACCP guidelines recommend possible weight-adjusted dosing in obese patients, but the guidelines provide no insight at what weight this should be considered, or what the “adjusted” dosing should be. Obese patients are at considerable risk of PE, but data from clinical trials on drug dosing are limited.
•
Enoxaparin 40 mg sub-Q twice daily has demonstrated better efficacy than 30 mg sub-Q twice daily in bariatric surgery patients.
•
Injections of enoxaparin into the thigh in obese patients have a lower bioavail­ability compared to injections into the abdomen.
•
One study suggests that the typical dose of a LMWH may have to be higher in patients with a body mass index ≥40.
•
Dalteparin 7,500 units daily has been evaluated in a retrospective study using anti-Xa levels in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
•
Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients is similar to non-obese patients with the heaviest patients studied ranges from 150 to 190 kg.
•
Optimal dosing of any agent for VTE prophylaxis in the morbidly obese patient is unclear; clinicians need to use discretion weighing thrombosis versus bleeding.
32
18
33
Pregnancy34 (see Chapter 19 for more information)
•
Warfarin has been associated with congenital abnormalities when used during the 1st trimester, and is therefore contraindicated. While warfarin could be used during the 2nd trimester, it is typically avoided throughout pregnancy.
•
A LMWH or UFH can be used throughout pregnancy.
•
LMWHs (or fondaparinux) are not contraindicated in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and can be used in the early 3rd trimester. During the peripartum period, many prefer to use UFH due to the shorter half-life and risk of bleeding during delivery.
•
DOACs have not been evaluated in pregnancy and should not be used.
HIT (see Chapter 18 for more information)
•
Meta-analysis demonstrates a risk of HIT of 2.6% for UFH and 0.2% for LMWH when prophylaxis doses are used.
•
Due to a cross-reactivity of 80-90%, a LMWH cannot be used as a substitute for UFH in patients who develop HIT.
•
Although fondaparinux may be an option in patients with a history of HIT due to low cross reactivity, case reports of HIT with fondaparinux have been noted.
•
DOACs have not been reported to cause HIT but have not been evaluated in the management of HIT at this time.
For information on neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia, see Chapter 10.
35
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PREVENTION 309
https://t.me/med1917
Quality Improvement
See Table 12-16.
TABLE 12-16: Quality Improvement Strategies
Strategy Description
Educational initiatives Peer-led presentations and inservices
Decision support tools Electronic alerts and reminders
Audit and feedback process Quality indicators and reports
Organizational changes Integrated care pathways
Standardized dosing times Utilize pharmacologic prophylaxis options that require less
Regulations and policy changes
Mailings
Risk assessment models and prophylaxis reminders in admission charts
Benchmarking against outcomes from highest performing provider
Changing from paper to computer-held patient records
frequent dosing to avoid possible missed doses. Utilize a standard dosing time in the evening (i.e., 2100) to avoid missing morning dosing due to patients being off the floor.
Reimbursement schemes including fee-for-service Required assessment policy
REFERENCES AND KEY ARTICLES*
*1. Dobesh PP, Wittkowsky AK, Stacy ZA, et al. Key articles and guidelines for the
prevention of venous thromboembolism. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29:410-458.
2. Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AD, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients. Chest. 2012;141(Suppl 2):e195S-e226S.
3. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients. Chest. 2012;121(Suppl 2):e227S-e277S.
4. Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients. Chest. 2012;141(Suppl 2):e278S-e325S.
*5. Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology
guideline: Recommendations for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients with Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5490-5505.
6. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2008;133:381S-453S.
7. Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008;111(10):4902-
4907.