Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2901_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
☆
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 30
https://t.me/medicina_free
TIMEPOINT  1
Ms Jones, a 32-year-old marketing consultant, attends her GP with a 5-week history of feeling tired all the time, despite sleeping significantly more than she used to. She says that she feels exhausted all day long, even though she now gets around 10 hours sleep compared to her previ­ously managing fine with 6.
She is worried about her work as she feels that she is letting her team down by not being as good at her job as she was before. She finds it difficult to concentrate during meetings and has missed several important deadlines over the last month. In her spare time, she used to enjoy baking with her daughter, but lately she has found that she is not interested in this and would rather go to sleep.
She denies any attempts at suicide or self-harm but admits she sometimes wonders whether her family would be better off without her.
On examination, her observations are nor­mal. Her general examination is unremarkable although the doctor notes that her clothes appear to fit loosely. On further questioning she reveals that she has dropped two dress sizes due to weight loss over the last 3 months.
Ms Jones has a past medical history of psoria­sis and irritable bowel syndrome. For her skin, she uses emollients regularly and adds in Dovobet (calipotriol/betamethasone) when she has flares. She is able to manage her IBS herself with a com­bination of laxatives and peppermint oil capsules as needed. She has no known drug allergies. She lives with her partner and 4-year-old daughter. She drinks around 20 units of alcohol a week and has never smoked.
What are diagnostic criteria for depression (according to NICE and DSM-IV/V: major depressive disorder)?
Core symptoms
Loss of interest/pleasure in activities previ­ously enjoyed (anhedonia)
Persistent low mood
Secondary symptoms
Change in sleep pattern – excessive sleepiness or insomnia
Indecisiveness or inability to concentrate
Change in weight and/or change in appetite
Lack of energy or fatigue
Excessive guilt or feelings of worthlessness
Psychomotor agitation or retardation
Suicidal ideation or attempts
Patients must display five or more of the above symptoms, including at least one of the core symptoms.
e symptoms must occur for most of the day, nearly every day, for at least 2 weeks, and be caus­ing distress to the patient.
e symptoms must not be attributable to any other medical condition or medication.
Severity criteria
Mild severity: five symptoms with minimal
social/occupational impairment
Moderate: five+ core symptoms with variable
social/occupational impairment
Severe: five+ core symptoms with significant
social/occupational impairment
DOI: 10.1201/9781351257725-30
159
160 Clinical Cases
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 30.1 Management options for treatment of depression
Mild–moderate Moderate–severe
First line
Second
line
Third line If SSRIs not tolerated, consider
With all interventions, review the patient after 2 weeks to assess progress.
Watchful waiting OR low-intensity psychological
interventions
SSRIs If SSRIs not tolerated, consider
alternative, e.g. tricyclic antidepressant
SSRI AND psychological intervention
alternative, e.g. tricyclic antidepressant
Electroconvulsive therapy
What would be the first- and second-line options for treatment?
Ms Jones would be classified as having moderate– severe depression (Table 30.1).
Low-intensity psychological interventions
Guided self-help cognitive behavioural therapy
Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy
Relaxation therapy
Psychological interventions
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Interpersonal therapy
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
e.g. fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram
Warn patient about risk of bleeding and other side effects, e.g. gastrointestinal upset
Check for drug interactions, e.g. St John’s Wort, aspirin, clopidogrel
Make sure the patient is aware that it will take time for the treatment to work fully (up to 8weeks)
Make sure the patient is aware not to stop treatment suddenly (risk of SSRI discontinua­tion syndrome)
to find her sprawled on the bed, surrounded by tissues and an empty paracetamol packet.
She says that she took a few tablets early in the morning because she had a headache, but aer that she was feeling so down that she kept tak­ing tablets until she had finished an entire packet of 16 tablets over the next couple of hours. She denies taking them with any alcohol or any other medications.
Her observations are normal and there is nothing to find on examination.
She complains of feeling nauseous so is pre­scribed some anti-emetics.
What questions do you need to ask for any overdose or poisoning history?
Regarding the drug taken
What time was the drug taken?
Which drugs were taken?
How many tablets were taken/what were the quantities?
Were the drugs taken with alcohol?
Depression history: including all core and
secondary symptoms
Suicide risk assessment, as below
What are the components of a suicide risk assessment?
TIMEPOINT  2
Ten days later, Ms Jones is brought into the local emergency department by her partner, who reports that he came home from work at 7.30 pm
What led up to the attempt? What was the
tipping point or trigger?
Have they made any previous attempts at
suicide or self-harm?
Case 30: Timepoint 2 161
120 0.8
Plasma-paracetamol concentration (mmol ⁄ litre)
Plasma-paracetamol concentration (mg ⁄ litre)
Time (hours)
https://t.me/medicina_free
What was the method of attempted suicide? When and where did they to it? How were they discovered?
Were alcohol or drugs involved?
Was it a spontaneous attempt, or had they made plans in advance? Advance plans might include: stockpiling medications, writing a suicide note, making precautions to avoid being found by others, preparing a will or dealing with finances
How do they feel now? Do they feel sad, angry or regretful? Would they attempt suicide again now if they had the opportunity?
Do they have any protective factors? What do they have to live for?
What features would make this overdose high risk?
Staggered overdose
Overdose taken with alcohol
Overdose taken with an additional drug
High-dose overdose (over 150 mg paracetamol per kg weight)
How should Ms Jones be managed?
Consider giving activated charcoal if the patient attends within 1 hour of ingestion of >150 mg/kg paracetamol
If on or above the treatment line (Figure 30.1), give N-acetylcysteine (NAC) = 3× back-to­back infusions
Bag 1 = 150 mg/kg NAC (max 16.5 g) in 200 mL 5% glucose or 0.9% NaCl over 1 hour
Bag 2 = 50 mg/kg NAC (max 5.5 g) in 500 mL 5% glucose or 0.9% NaCl over 4 hours
Bag 3 = 100 mg/kg NAC (max 11 g) in 1000 mL 5% glucose or 0.9% NaCl over 16hours
Consider intensive care and psychiatric referrals
110
0
0
Treatment line
2
4681012
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Figure 30.1 Treatment line graph for paracetamol overdose.
14 16 18 20 22 24
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
162 Clinical Cases
https://t.me/medicina_free
Key point
Use of the treatment line does not apply in staggered overdose – all staggered overdoses should be treated with NAC.
TIMEPOINT  3
Ms Jones is treated with N-acetylcysteine as per protocol and moved to the acute medical unit overnight. Twelve hours later, Ms Jones’ part­ner arrives to visit her. He shows the doctors a picture of four empty wine bottles which he had found hidden under the kitchen sink and then goes in to see her. Ms Jones is asleep when he arrives. He wakes her up to say hello, but she is very drowsy. She opens her eyes slightly, and he immediately notices that her eyes appear yel­low. He goes to fetch a nurse who calls for the doctor.
Ms Jones’ blood tests are repeated, including
an arterial blood gas (Table 30.2).
What does the ABG show?
e ABG shows evidence of a raised anion gap metabolic acidosis. is could also be classified as a Type B2 lactic acidosis (Table 30.3).
What are the criteria for liver transplantation?
e most commonly used criteria are the King’s College Criteria, which are as follows:
Patients should be referred for liver transplant
immediately if they have:
Table 30.2 Venous and arterial blood results
Venous blood tests
White cell count 8.0× 10 Haemoglobin 124g/L Platelets 297 × 10 Sodium 142 mmol/L Potassium 4.3mmol/L Urea 6.4 mmol/L Creatinine 420μmol/L INR 7.2 Bilirubin 92 μmol/L Alanine aminotransferase 1734 u/L Alkaline phosphatase 143 u/L Albumin 37 g/L
Arterial blood gas
pH 6.92
3.9 kPa
PaCO
2
10.5 kPa
PaO
2
5.8 mmol/L
HCO
3
Base excess –23.9 mmol/L Lactate 8.4 mmol/L Sodium 142 mmol/L Potassium 4.2 mmol/L
Chloride 101 mmol/L
9
/L
9
/L
Ms Jones qualifies for a liver transplant and is transferred to the local transplant centre. She has the transplant and is started on tacrolimus, azathioprine and prednisolone. She recovers well from the operation and is discharged from hospi­tal 2 weeks later once her liver function tests have normalised.
TIMEPOINT  4
Arterial pH <7.3
OR all three of the following:
INR>6.5 or PT>100
Creatinine >300
Grade III/IV hepatic encephalopathy
Two months later, Ms Jones attends her liver spe­cialist for a follow-up appointment. Prior to the appointment, she was asked to have blood tests, the results of which are given in Table 30.4.
Ms Jones denies any symptoms, and her observations and abdominal examination are normal.
Table 30.3 Types and causes of lactic acidosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
Type of lactic acidosis Causes
A
(Secondary to hypoperfusion and hypoxia, causing
anaerobic glycolysis)
B
(Not related to hypoperfusion
and hypoxia)
(Associated with
underlying disease)
(Related to drugs or
toxins)
(Inborn errors of
metabolism)
1
2
3
Case 30: Timepoint 4 163
Shock (septic, cardiogenic, or any other type) Ischaemia Seizure Carbon monoxide poisoning Malignancy Infection Liver failure Renal failure Pancreatitis Diabetic ketoacidosis Paracetamol Salicylates Methanol Metformin G6PD deficiency Pyruvate decarboxylase deficiency
What could be causing these blood test results?
confirms acute cellular rejection and Ms Jones is started on high-dose steroids. Her usual immu­nosuppression regime is altered. Aer 1 week, her
Acute cellular rejection occurs in up to 50% of patients within one year of liver
LFTs have normalised again, and the consultant is happy to discharge her.
transplantation
It is usually asymptomatic and picked up due to deranged LFTs
e diagnosis is confirmed by liver biopsy
Treatment is using a short course of high­dose steroids, aer which the patient’s usual immunosuppression regime is increased
Chronic rejection may occur if the patient has recurrent acute rejection, or acute rejection that is refractory to treatment
What other complications are there of liver transplantation, other than acute cellular rejection?
Hyperacute rejection
Rare unless donor ABO-incompatible
Due to pre-formed antibodies against donor major histocompatibility complex
Causes massive hepatic necrosis occur­ring within days
Ms Jones is admitted to the hepatology ward for a liver biopsy and further monitoring. Liver biopsy
Table 30.4 Venous blood results
9
White cell count Haemoglobin 131 g/L Creatinine 89 μmol/L Platelets 346 × 10 MCV 87 fL Bilirubin 36 μmol/L Sodium 137 mmol/L Alkaline phosphatase 178 U/L Potassium 4.9 mmol/L Alanine aminotransferase 102 U/L
6.3 × 10
/L Urea
9
/L Albumin 34 g/L
Chronic rejection
Occurs aer months to years
6.7 mmol/L
164 Clinical Cases
https://t.me/medicina_free
Usually presents with progressive cholestasis
In later stages bile duct loss and fibrosis are seen
Treatment is with escalation of immuno­suppression or re-transplantation
Gra failure
Transplant does not start working properly
Bleeding
Liver transplantation is particularly high risk as patients may have clotting defi­ciencies secondary to the liver failure
Post-operative wound infection, opportunis­tic infection secondary to use of immunosup­pressive medications, and malignancy
Transplanted patients are heavily immu­nosuppressed so at high risk
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
rombosis of the vena cava, portal vein or
hepatic artery
Biliary anastomotic leak
Biliary strictures
Secondary to poor preservation of the liver during the transplantation procedure
Disease recurrence
Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, alcoholic liverdisease, PBC, PSC and autoimmune hepatitis have all been documented as having recurred in a transplanted liver
Case 31
https://t.me/medicina_free
TIMEPOINT  1
Mr Roberts is a 64 year old who works as a reg­istrar for births, marriages and deaths who has found the last 2 years the hardest of his otherwise unblemished 34-year career, partly connected to his closest colleague leaving to move to Canada. He has found he has been working unpaid extra hours – and work thus has felt immensely stressful. He has experienced several relatives passing away, was divorced 4 years ago and felt this work would help him sort out his financial affairs. He has become increasingly lonely and rarely visits the GP. Mr Roberts was usually fit and well with no past medi­cal history, but he has taken a total of 11 sick days in the month leading up to his hospital admission.
On the day of admission, the neighbour comes out of her house, and is surprised because Mr Roberts usually turns on his favourite radio ‘talk show’ immediately aer starting his car to drive to work; it seems his car has been running for a very long time inside the garage, but she hears no voices from the radio.
She calls the police in case something is wrong. ey arrive, crank up the garage door, see tubing from the exhaust to the driver and immediately call an ambulance.
On arrival Mr Roberts has the following features:
Respiratory rate: 29/min Oxygen saturations: 99% on room air Temperature: 36.5°C Blood pressure: 130/80 mmHg Heart rate: 110 bpm GCS: 14/15
Which toxicological influences can be present despite normal oxygen saturations?
Carbon monoxide and methaemoglobin can both be potentially present in significant con­centrations despite normal oxygen saturations.
TIMEPOINT  2
Within 30 minutes of arrival, the emergency department doctor assigned to Mr Roberts starts working quickly because they are aware that the likely diagnosis is carbon monoxide poisoning/ car-fume inhalation and there is a need to man­age Mr Roberts pro-actively. e emergency department doctor checks Mr Roberts’ carboxy­haemoglobin level and finds out that the result is 17%, far above the upper limit of normal.
e team contacts the National Poisons Information Service and also speaks to the regional hyperbaric centre who advises maximal high-flow non-rebreather oxygen therapy but not hyperbaric transfer. He makes step-by-step improvements in carboxyhaemoglobin levels and oxygenation via repeated blood gas tests.
What are the clinical indicators of carbon monoxide poisoning?
ere are rather few, but they may include a degree of pink/pale colouration of the lips/skin and a normal value on bedside pulse oximeter despite an appropriate history.
A physician associate student working with the acute admitting medical team sees that there is a clear need to use oxygen in Mr Roberts, but asks her colleague a question about whether every medical patient should have oxygen.
DOI: 10.1201/9781351257725-31
165
166 Clinical Cases
https://t.me/medicina_free
The use of oxygen for acutely admitted medical patients
Historically, innumerable numbers of acutely admitted adult medical patients, including those with a variety of cardio-respiratory disorders, arrived in emergency departments with a non-rebreather mask attached to high-flow oxygen. It is increasingly clear that oxygen is a drug that needs coordinated prescription and careful titration. Recent evidence, whilst not diminishing the need for oxygen in those for whom it is required, such as those with severe hypoxia, suggest the need for an alteration in approach.
There are now several scenarios which are linked to harm associated with unwarranted oxy­gen therapy. The current evidence base shows worse outcomes in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction where oxygen is not needed. New guidance now suggests not giving oxygen to those with an oxygen saturation above 93%. Patients with COPD will generally have a target saturation of 88–92%.
Similarly, alongside COPD, other patients with or at risk for Type 2 respiratory failure may have a similar target including those with some severe neuromuscular disorders, obstructive sleep apnoea, etc. As described above, higher target oxygen saturations (in the >93% category) are now generally reserved where a particular need for oxygen delivery is required, including carbon monoxide poisoning (as above), cluster headache and certain haematological emer­gencies such as sickle cell crisis.
When is hyperbaric oxygen indicated?
Hyperbaric oxygen is indicated when pressurised oxygen is required to increase the availabil­ity of oxygen in the body, beyond what is possible with standard oxygen delivery methods.
It is not without risks and therefore needs to be decided upon dependent on the degree
of clinical need.
The indications for hyperbaric oxygen in carbon monoxide poisoning include:
Carboxyhaemoglobin level > 20%
A failure to respond to high normobaric delivery of oxygen
Patient is a pregnant woman
In general terms, hyperbaric chambers have a range of clinical roles. Across the world there are multiple registers of hyperbaric chambers that can be single- or multi-occupancy. A general contraindication is pneumothorax. In terms of side effects, barotrauma to the ear has been reported with other adverse effects much less common. In the UK there are sev­eral regional hyperbaric centres, often associated with coastal/nautical organisations. The frequently considered indications for hyperbaric oxygen include carbon monoxide excess; decompression illness (deep sea diving–related); gas/air embolism; necrotising soft tissue infection; acute traumatic/thermic/radiation injury.
Case 31: Further Reading 167
https://t.me/medicina_free
TIMEPOINT  3
Mr Roberts is transferred with ongoing, titrated, prescribed oxygen therapy to the ward. On the medical ward, once it is felt the oxygenation issues have improved to a very significant degree, attention then turns to the factors leading to the suicide attempt. Liaison psychiatry assessment takes place, and a detailed assessment of affect, depression risk and future potential for self-harm suicidality takes place. Community-based mental health support arrangements are put in place.
Why should oxygen be prescribed as a prescription medication?
e patient safety issues related to oxygen clearly warrant the need for it to be prescribed; it is colourless, odourless and flammable. In addition, the required oxygen delivery – such as FiO2 – for a given patient may change over time; prevention of over-oxygenation is extremely important as it is linked to lung injury and, in certain cases, hyper­capnic Type 2 respiratory failure.
TIMEPOINT  4
Four weeks later, Mr Roberts has a day with work scheduling at the lightest possible level as he sched­uled a GP appointment in the morning and then a meeting with his line manager and occupational health representative in the aernoon. e meeting at the workplace involves an overall review of his physical and mental health information during his overall duration with the employer. In the second part of the meeting he is advised that profession­als would join the meeting. ose joining include an employment adviser, a union member and an external occupational health adviser alongside those already present. e employer looks at:
Areas of professional conduct and capability
Levels of experience
Health records
e outcome of the meeting is to calculate the Bradford Factor.
What is the Bradford Factor?
e Bradford Factor (BF) is a human resource tool that has been around for decades. It is thought to be named aer work undertaken by the Bradford University School of Management. e basic idea is to find a formula that gives a numerical value to patterns of absence, with a lower score signi­fying a better record. It is usually used as a dis­ciplinary tool for sickness absence – and BF use has led to people being sacked or otherwise hav­ing decisions made against them. It is a sickness absence management tool, designed to impose limits on workers’ absence, not to help them overcome sickness or poor health, work-related or otherwise. It is presented as a means of deal­ing fairly with the employer-defined problem that many short absences are more disruptive to the employer’s business activities than a single long one. e formula puts a lot of weight on indi­vidual absences, and it produces a score over a reference period, using a very simple calculation: Bradford Factor = number of unrelated absence periods² × days absent. For example, 10 days’ absence in the reference period (a year, say) could occur as: 1 absence of 10 days, which would have a BF of [(1 × 1) × 10] = 10; 5 absences of 2 days each which would have a BF of [(5 × 5) × 10] = 250; 10 absences of 1 day each which would have a BF of [(10 × 10) × 10] = 1000.
Following the professionals’ meeting, to clarify the overall outcome of recovery from the car­bon monoxide episode, a neuropsychological assessment is arranged. e neuropsychological assessment demonstrates some evidence of cog­nitive impairment. An informal further meeting with the line manager means that the essential importance of certification of births, marriages and deaths means that Mr Roberts’ work duties need to be altered. In fact, this is a collabora­tive outcome as Mr Roberts admits he has found thoughts of changing roles a real consideration recently. e employer finds a different role in which Mr Roberts can be deployed in an area of renewed interest, within the same organisation with no long-term salary or pension implications but incorporating some regular collective team meetings and three monthly health checks for