Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2894_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
12 Мб
Скачать
☆
xxiv
https://t.me/medicina_free
Abbreviations
TNF Tumor necrosis factor TNF-α Tumor necrosis factor-alpha TST Tuberculin skin test TTD Time to detection TU Tuberculin unit UCNPs Upconversion Nanoparticles U-DST Upfront Universal-Drug Sensitivity Testing strategy UNION International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease USG Ultrasonography UV Ultraviolet VNTR Variable number of tandem repeats VOBa Volatile organic biomarkers WBCs White blood cells WGS Whole genome sequencing WHO World Health Organization XDR Extensively drug resistance ZN Ziehl-Neelsen zTB Zoonotic tuberculosis
Chapter 1
https://t.me/medicina_free
Introduction totheDiagnosis ofMycobacterium
AmitSingh, GuruDuttaSatyarthee, andDivakarSharma
Abstract Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is a causative agent of tuberculosis. It
is slightly curved, rod shaped, and arranged in singles or in groups. It manifests as pulmonary, extrapulmonary, and sometimes miliary disease. It grows very slowly and takes up to 21–42days to become a visible colony in the Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) growth media. Cases of tuberculosis are increasing, and timely management is an essential component for the control of the disease, in which laboratory diagnosis plays an important role. Various diagnostics tools have been developed and used for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, drug-resistant tuberculosis, nontuberculosis myco­bacterium (NTM), and zoonotic tuberculosis. The available techniques involved more ancient like microscopy, culture to the mostadvanced molecular tests, matrix­assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of ight-mass spectrometry (MALDI­TOF- MS), and point-of-care (POC) devices (e.g., LAM). These available tools are currently used in the management of tuberculosis. Researchers are also exploring newer, advanced, fast, and cheaper diagnostics for tuberculosis to overcome the cur­rent limitations. In the introductory chapter, we outline and summarize the different laboratory tests used for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, which are further elaborated in the dedicated chapter of the book.
Keywords Tuberculosis · LJ culture · Microscopy · GeneXpert · NAAT · Automated culture · Zoonotic tuberculosis · NTM
A. Singh (*) Department of Gastroenterology & HNU, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Microbiology, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India
G. D. Satyarthee Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
D. Sharma Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 A. Singh, D. Sharma (eds.), Diagnosis of Mycobacterium,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5624-1_1
1
2
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Singh etal.
1.1 Introduction
In 2022, tuberculosis (TB) caused an estimated 1.6 million deaths, including 187,000 deaths among people positive with HIV/AIDS and 1.4 million among HIV negatives, and gave rise to 10.6 million new cases globally, becoming the leading infectious cause of mortality in the world [1]. The number of new cases of rifampi­cin resistant was reported to be 450,000in 2021. Approximately three to ve mil­lion cases are not reported or diagnosed, which might have contributed to the increase in tuberculosis cases globally [1]. The most common manifestation of tuberculosis is known as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), which mainly infects the lungs. The bacterium may spread to other organs through a hematogenous route and may cause infection in other organs; this is called extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) [2]. Depending on the site of infection, various clinical samples were col­lected. In PTB cases, sputum, induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), etc. were collected, and for EPTB cases, pleural uid, pericardial uid, blood, bone marrow, cerebrospinal uid (CSF), tissue, pus, swabs, urine, endometrium aspirate, lymph nodes, ne-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples, bronchial secre­tions, and gastric lavage [3, 4]. Depending on the samples, different diagnostic tech- niques were used to diagnose tuberculosis.
The diagnosis of TB includes conventional (culture, Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN), and uorescent stained microscopy) [5], radiological (X-ray, CT scan, MRI) [6], and molecular diagnostics (GeneXpert, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse tran­scription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), line probe assay (LPA)) [7–11]. Microscopy is a rapid test and may be completed within half an hour to detect acid­fast bacilli (AFB) in smear examination [12]. Since its limit of detection requires a minimum bacterial load of 10,000/ml of clinical sample, it lacks sensitivity and specicity [10, 13, 14]. Further, it does not differentiate between infectious and environmental mycobacteria. The culture method is considered a gold standard for tuberculosis diagnosis as it provides a specic growth identication feature to char­acterize up to species level and can further be used for drug susceptibility tests [15,
16]. The culture technique is more sensitive and more specic than other conven-
tional diagnostics methods but is time-consuming. Mycobacterium tuberculosis grows very slowly, and Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture takes 4–8weeks, whereas automated liquid culture methods take 2–6weeks [17]. The molecular test is rapid, sensitive but requires laboratory infrastructure, is expensive, and needs trained man­power to perform it [13]. Further research needs to identify novel biomarkers for the development of rapid, inexpensive, and sensitive point-of-care tests for the effective management of tuberculosis and to achieve World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) sustainable development goal (SDG) to end TB [1, 18]. The major challenges for thediagnosis of zoonotic tuberculosis [19], TB in pediatric cases and vulnerable populations [9, 20].
1 Introduction totheDiagnosis ofMycobacterium
https://t.me/medicina_free
1.2 Laboratory Diagnosis ofMycobacterium
Laboratory diagnosis starts with sample collection. The identication of the appro­priate site of infection and collecting samples for the diagnosis of mycobacterium are important tasks. The procedure and quality of the sample determine the correct laboratory diagnosis of the disease. The most commonly used sample for Mtb cul­ture is sputum from patients with pulmonary TB [4, 17]. For EPTB, various clinical samples were collected depending on the site of infection on sterile container [3,
17]. The samples include tissue, pleural uid, pericardial uid, blood, bone marrow,
CSF, tissue, pus, swabs, urine, endometrium aspirate, lymph nodes, FNAC samples, bronchial secretions, and gastric lavage. After receiving the samples, proper storage conditions and procedures should be followed to proceed to diagnostics. An appro­priately collected sample is the key to the diagnosis of TB [17]. The collected sam­ples were further processed for mycobacterial diagnosis, depending on the facility available. The diagnosis of tuberculosis is divided into conventional, radiological, and molecular methods; immunological diagnosis; and newer diagnosis (Figs.1.1 and 1.2).
1.3 Conventional Methods
3
1.3.1 Microscopy
Smear microscopy is the most rapid and a cost-effective method for the detection of tuberculous bacilli [17]. The smears are prepared from processed or direct samples and further stained with ZN stain or uorescent stained and observed under standard light microscopy and a uorescent microscope, depending on the staining tech­niques used. The ZN-stained tubercle bacilli under a light microscope appear as red pink, long, or slightly curved bacilli [17]. The rhodamine-auramine stained bacilli, when observed under a uorescent microscope, appears yellow or orange under ultraviolet light and bright orange bacilli in pale green background when stained by acridine orange [17]. Some histopathological methods (e.g., immunohistochemistry (IHC)) were also used for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
1.3.2 Culture
The culture method is more sensitive and to date is considered a gold standard method for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Culture is also essential for performing drug-susceptibility testing (DST) and genotyping through mycobacterial inter­spersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), or spoligotyping methods [12, 21, 22].
4
https://t.me/medicina_free
Molecular Te st
RT-PCR based
PCR based diagnosis
Line Probe Assay
GeneXpert
TruNAAT
LAMP test
A. Singh etal.
Culture based
LJ Culture
MGIT Culture
BactAlertCulture system
Fast Plaque assay
Microscopy
AFB staining
AR staining
Laboratory Diagnosis
of tuberculosis
Point-of-Care
LAM-IC T
Mpt64 for NTM
GeneXpert
Newer Test
MALDI- TOF-MS
VOC-test
IC T based
Immunological
Mantoux test
IGRA test
Fig. 1.1 Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterium
Sterile samples were directly inoculated on culture media, while sputum or nonster­ile samples were processed through Patroff’s modied methods and then incubated at 37°C for up to 8weeks [17]. Mtb shows rough, tuff, buff, and creamy colonies in the LJ medium [5, 17]. In the liquid culture medium, the bacilli grow on surface and form cordsand wrinkle pellicle. They grow more rapidly in liquid culture media as compared to LJ or other solid media. Automated culture systems (Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT), BactAlert, VersaTREK, etc.) are more rapid, and growth is detected through the production of uorescence or a change in color due to the depletion of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the medium [15, 17, 23]. Further Mtb identication in culture is performed through biochemical tests (nitrate reductase, niacin test, arylsulfatase, urease, and tween 80 hydrolysis), molecular tests, or immunochromatographic test (ICT)-based MPT64 strip-based tests (Fig.1.1) [17].
1 Introduction totheDiagnosis ofMycobacterium
https://t.me/medicina_free
5
Fig. 1.2 Flow chart of various dianostics methods for the diagnosis of mycobacterium
The bacteriophage-based test was also developed to detect TB in sputum samples [17]. Nonpathogenic mycobacteria (i.e., sensor cells) were used as control bacteria in the test. The phage replicates, infects, and lyses the sensor cells, leaving zones of clearing (holes) in the agar media. The zone of clearing indicates that the patient’s sputum contains viable TB bacilli. The test is cheaper, sensitive (only requires 100
6
https://t.me/medicina_free
bacilli/ml sputum), and fast with a 2-day turnaround time. Its main limitations are it is technically demanding and can be applied for sputum specimens only.
A. Singh etal.
1.4 Radiological Methods
Radiological diagnosis is an important tool for the diagnosis of PTB and EPTB. Clinicians must learn this skill and sharpen it to improve TB diagnosis. Errors in radiograph interpretation can lead to both under- and overdiagnosis. Remember impact of rotation, phase of respiration, exposure, motion, artifact and cofounders like thymic shadow. Radiographic ndings in tuberculosis have been well described [24]. Chest X-ray (CXR), CT scan, and MRI are most commonly the radiological methods used for the presumptive diagnosis of tuberculosis (Fig.1.2).
1.5 Molecular Diagnosis
Earlier methods are either less sensitive, time-consuming, and have a slow growth rate of Mtb, whereas molecular methods have become the rst choice for the rapid detection of TB.Various Nucleic Acid Amplication Test (NAAT)-based tests were developed for the detection of tuberculosis directly from patient samples. These tests can identify etiological agents and also provide information on drug resistance. The cartridge-based GeneXpert and TruNAAT are the current choice for molecular diagnosis because of their ease of performance, but these are very expensive and need infrastructure. PCR or multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) is the most common format of NAAT; other amplication techniques include loop­mediated isothermal amplication (LAMP), ligase chain reaction (LCR), strain dis­placement amplication, CRISPER-Cas, and real-time-based tests. Some molecular tests, like Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert MTB/XDR, LPA, and real-time-based tests are capable of providing information on drug resistance. Whole-genome sequencing or targeted sequencing methods are also in use for the identication and detection of TB either from samples or culture [10, 11, 23, 25, 26].
1.6 Immunological Methods
Immunological methods used for the immunodiagnostics of TB can provide indirect evidence on the current or past infections/exposure to tubercle bacilli. Tuberculin skin test (TST) has limited application due to cross-reactivity and poor sensitivity [8, 13]. Also, WHO bans all existing serological tests for use in the diagnosis of tuberculosis due to their poor sensitivity and specicity and at the same time
1 Introduction totheDiagnosis ofMycobacterium
https://t.me/medicina_free
encourages identifying novel biomarkers to develop newer immunodiagnostics for the detection of tuberculosis [14, 27].
1.6.1 Antigen Detection
The detection of tuberculosis antigens in patient samples provides direct evidence of TB.Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is a promising antigen for antigen detection for TB and is used as a point-of-care test for the rapid detection of TB in urine and other samples. LAM is a promising target for antigen detection for TB diagnosis due to its temperature stability and its possibility to be detected in urine [28]. LAM-based assays are included in the WHO-TB diagnosis retooling program.
1.6.2 Antibody Detection
Antibody detection against TB is rapid, cost-effective, simple, and easy to perform, but due to its poor sensitivity and specicity, WHO bans the use of serological tests for tuberculosis diagnosis and instructed researchers to nd novel biomarkers for the development of antibody-based detection methods [13].
7
1.6.3 Tuberculin Skin Test or PPD Test
The PPD (puried protein derivative) test determines previous exposure to TB bacilli or whether the patient received bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination. The standard recommended Mantoux test, in which 0.1mL of liquid containing 5 TU (tuberculin units) PPD is injected into the top layers of skin of the forearm and observed for presence or absence and the amount of induration (localized swelling) within 48–72h after the injection [9].
1.6.4 Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs)
IGRA overcomes the problems confronting tuberculin skin test (TST) interpreta­tion. There are two available formats for IGRA: (1) Quantiferon-TB Gold and (2) T Spot-TB test. IGRA assay is based on the ability of TB antigens, such as ESAT-6 and CFP-10, to stimulate the host for the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). The amount of interferon-γ released from the cells is estimated. Results are inter­preted both qualitatively (positive, negative, or indeterminate) and quantitatively.
8
https://t.me/medicina_free
Immunization with BCG does not affect the test result of the IGRA assay because the antigens used are specic to Mtb and absent in BCG [29].
A. Singh etal.
1.7 Newer TB Diagnosis
Rapid technological development in the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis, espe­cially molecular diagnosis, has reduced the time required for identication and sus­ceptibility testing. Continuous effort is made for the increase of reproducibility, improvement of performance, and cost-effectiveness. Many rapid, portable, and sensitive biosensors, electro-sensors with instant “on-the-spot” interpretation, have been developed for tuberculosis detection based on different biological elements, like DNA, RNA, or protein recognition systems and basic signal transducer princi­ples. The combination of biosensing technology and nanotechnology is very prom­ising. Many point-of-care devices are in development that will further help in enhancing TB detection [13].
Currently, nanoparticles have shown a potential for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. The engineering of biomaterials and nanocarriers represents an exciting opportunity in the eld of diagnostics (30). Various innovative and efcient nano­diagnostics have been developed by researchers for infectious diseases, including TB.Laksanasopin etal. [31] developed a smartphone-based POC to diagnose infec­tious diseases by connecting traditional immunoassay into a smartphone via acces­sories such as dongles [13, 31, 32].
1.8 Conclusions
This is now exciting era for development of newer TB diagnostics. The develop­ment of various advanced biosensors and nanotechnology enhance the possibility to developing rapid, sensitive point-of-care tests. Till now, rapid, high-specic molec­ular assays for TB detection and drug susceptibility tests cannot replace the standard diagnostic methods (such as culture, microscopy, clinical and radiological assess­ments, and conventional DST for active TB in PTB and EPTB samples). In this book, we are covering all the diagnostics of Mycobacterium, from microscopy to the more advanced point-of-care tests for the detection of tuberculosis.
References
1. WHO.Global tuberculosis report 2022 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 May 5]. https://www.who.
int/teams/global- tuberculosis- programme/tb- reports/global- tuberculosis- report- 2022.
1 Introduction totheDiagnosis ofMycobacterium
https://t.me/medicina_free
2. Purohit M, Mustafa T. Laboratory diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in resource-constrained setting: state of the art, challenges and the need. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):EE01–6.
3. Sharma SK, Mohan A.Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120(4):316–53.
4. Ling DI, Flores LL, Riley LW, Pai M.Commercial nucleic-acid amplication tests for diag­nosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in respiratory specimens: meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS One. 2008;3(2):e1536.
5. Kubica GP, Dye WE, Cohn ML, Middlebrook G. Sputum digestion and decontamination with N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide for culture of mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1963;87:775–9.
6. Andreu J, Cáceres J, Pallisa E, Martinez-Rodriguez M.Radiological manifestations of pulmo­nary tuberculosis. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51(2):139–49.
7. Rufai SB, Singh A, Kumar P, Singh J, Singh S. Performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis by use of pleural uid samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(11):3636–8.
8. Rufai SB, Singh S, Singh A, Kumar P, Singh J, Vishal A. Performance of Xpert MTB/ RIF on Ascitic uid samples for detection of abdominal tuberculosis. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(1):47–52.
9. Singh S, Singh A, Prajapati S, Kabra SK, Lodha R, Mukherjee A, etal. Xpert MTB/RIF assay can be used on archived gastric aspirate and induced sputum samples for sensitive diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:191.
10. Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N.Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, Steingart KR, editors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley; 2014 [cited 2014 Mar 9]. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub3.
11. Gopinath K, Singh S.Multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium complexes and other Mycobacterial spe­cies directly from clinical specimens. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107(2):425–35.
12. Singh A, Gopinath K, Singh N, Singh S.Deciphering the sequential events during invivo acqui­sition of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2014;3(1):36–40.
13. Singh A, Kumar Gupta A, Gopinath K, Sharma P, Singh S.Evaluation of 5 novel protein bio­markers for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis: preliminary results. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44121.
14. Singh S, Katoch VM.Commercial serological tests for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in India: time for introspection. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(5):583.
15. Bardarov S, Dou H, Eisenach K, Banaiee N, Ya S u, Chan J, et al. Detection and drug­susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis from sputum samples using luciferase reporter phage: comparison with the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;45(12573551):53–61.
16. Katoch VM.New generation methods for drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis. Indian J Tuberc. 2008;55(2):61–3.
17. Kent PT, Kubica GP.Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. Washington, DC: U.S.Department of Health and Human Services; 1985. 207p.
18. WHO-STAG TB. Strategic and technical advisory group for tuberculosis (STAG-TB) [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2011. p. 1–40. https://cdn.who.int/
media/docs/default- source/documents/tuberculosis/stag- tb- report- 11.pdf?sfvrsn=7eccaf2_2& download=true.
19. Rahman MT, Sobur MA, Islam MS, Ievy S, Hossain MJ, El Zowalaty ME, et al. Zoonotic diseases: etiology, impact, and control. Microorganisms. 2020;8(9):1405.
20. Chauhan LS, Arora VK, Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Management of pediatric tuber­culosis under the revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP). Indian Pediatr. 2004;41(9):901–5.
9