Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5402_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
14 Мб
Скачать
☆
References 85
https://t.me/med1917
48 Mehta, A., Sonam, S., Gouri, I. et al. (2014). SMMRNA: a database of small
molecule modulators of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (D1): https://doi.org/10 .1093/nar/gkt976.
49 Bodoor, K., Boyapati, V. , Gopu, V. et al. (2009). Design and implementation
of an ribonucleic acid (RNA) directed fragment library. J. Med. Chem. 52 (12): https://doi.org/10.1021/jm9000659.
50 Padroni, G., Patwardhan, N.N., Schapira, M., and Hargrove, A.E. (2020).
Systematic analysis of the interactions driving small molecule-RNA recognition. RSC. Med. Chem. 11 (7): https://doi.org/10.1039/d0md00167h.
51 Nasiri, H.R., Bell, N.M., Mc Luckie, K.I.E. et al. (2014). Targeting a c-MYC
G-quadruplex DNA with a fragment library. Chem. Commun. 50 (14): https:// doi.org/10.1039/c3cc48390h.
52 Kirsch, P., Hartman, A.M., Hirsch, A.K.H., and Empting, M. (2019). Concepts
and core principles of fragment-based drug design. Molecules 24 (23): https:// doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234309.
53 Barnwal, R.P., Yang, F., and Varani, G. (2017). Applications of NMR to structure
determination of RNAs large and small. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 628: https://doi .org/10.1016/j.abb.2017.06.003.
54 Sreeramulu, S., Richter, C., Berg, H. et al. (2021). Exploring the druggability of
conserved RNA regulatory elements in the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (35): 19191–19200. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202103693.
55 Scott, D.E., Coyne, A.G., Hudson, S.A., and Abell, C. (2012). Fragment-based
approaches in drug discovery and chemical biology. Biochemistry 51 (25): https://doi.org/10.1021/bi3005126.
56 Lundquist, K.P., Panchal, V. , Gotfredsen, C.H. et al. (2021). Fragment-based
drug discovery for RNA targets. ChemMedChem 16 (17): https://doi.org/10 .1002/cmdc.202100324.
57 Lipfert, J. and Doniach, S. (2007). Small-angle X-ray scattering from RNA, pro-
teins, and protein complexes. Annu. Rev . Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36: https://doi .org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132655.
58 Fang, X., Stagno, J.R., Bhandari, Y.R. et al. (2015). Small-angle X-ray scattering:
a bridge between RNA secondary structures and three-dimensional topological structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 30: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2015.02.010.
59 Menichelli, E., Lam, B.J., Wang, Y. et al. (2022). Discovery of small molecules
that target a tertiary-structured RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119 (48): https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213117119.
60 Suresh, B.M., Li, W. , Zhang, P. et al. (2020). A general fragment-based approach
to identify and optimize bioactive ligands targeting RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (52): 33197–33203. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012217117.
61 Hughes, S.J., Millan, D.S., Kilty, I.C. et al. (2011). Fragment based discovery
of a novel and selective PI3 kinase inhibitor. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (21): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.07.117.
62 (a) Smith, G.P. and Petrenko, V.A. (1997). Phage display. Chem. Rev. 97
(2): 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr960065d; (b) Frenzel, A., Kügler, J.,
86 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
Helmsing, S., Meier, D., Schirrmann, T., Hust, M., & Dübel, S. (2017). Design­ing human antibodies by phage display. In Transf. Med. Hemother. (Vol. 44, Issue 5, pp. 312–318). . https://doi.org/10.1159/000479633
63 Li, M., Duc, A.C.E., Klosi, E. et al. (2009). Selection of peptides that target the
aminoacyl-tRNA site of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA. Biochemistry 48 (35): 8299–8311. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi900982t.
64 Lamichhane, T.N., Abeydeera, N.D., Duc, A.C.E. et al. (2011). Selection of
peptides targeting helix 31 of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA by screening M13 phage-display libraries. Molecules 16 (2): 1211–1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ molecules16021211.
65 Cawez, F., Duray, E., Hu, Y. et al. (2018). Combinatorial design of a nanobody
that specically targets structured RNAs. J. Mol. Biol. 430 (11): 1652–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.032.
66 Yee, S.S. and nter Gauglitz, G. (1999). Surface plasmon resonance sensors:
review. Sens. Actuat. B 54.
67 Davis, T.M. and Wilson, W.D. (2000). Determination of the refractive index
increments of small molecules for correction of surface plasmon resonance data. Anal. Biochem. 284 (2): 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.2000.4726.
68 Liu, Y. and Wilson, W. D. (2010). Quantitative analysis of small molecule-nucleic
acid interactions with a biosensor surface and surface plasmon resonance detec­tion. Methods Mol. Biol. 613: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-418-0_1.
69 Biacore application guide 29368543 AA 70 Myszka, D.G. (2000). Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic analysis of
macromolecular interactions with BIACORE. Methods Enzymol. 323: https://doi .org/10.1016/S0076-6879(00)23372-7323.
71 Arney, J.W. and Weeks, K.M. (2022). RNA-ligand interactions quantied by
surface plasmon resonance with reference subtraction. Biochemistry 61 (15): 1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00177.
72 Sahoo, H. (2011). Förster resonance energy transfer – a spectroscopic nanoruler:
principle and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 12 (1): 20–30. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.05.001.
73 . Grecco, H. E., & Verveer, P. J. (2011). FRET in cell biology: still shining in
the age of super-resolution? In ChemPhysChem (Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 484–490). Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000795
74 Dibrov, S.M., Johnston-Cox, H., Weng, Y.H., and Hermann, T. (2007). Func-
tional architecture of HCV IRES domain II stabilized by divalent metal ions in the crystal and in solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (1–2): 226–229. https://doi .org/10.1002/anie.200603807.
75 Parsons, J., Castaldi, M.P., Dutta, S. et al. (2009). Conformational inhibition of
the hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site RNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5 (11): 823–825. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.217.
76 Chen, J.L., Zhang, P., Abe, M. et al. (2020). Design, optimization, and study of
small molecules that target tau pre-mRNA and aect splicing. JACS 142 (19): 8706–8727. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00768.
References 87
https://t.me/med1917
77 Chen, C.Z., Sobczak, K., Hoskins, J. et al. (2012). Two high-throughput screen-
ing assays for aberrant RNA-protein interactions in myotonic dystrophy type
1. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 402 (5): 1889–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011­5604-0.
78 Jones, A.C. and Neely, R.K. (2015). 2-aminopurine as a uorescent probe of
DNA conformation and the DNA-enzyme interface. Q. Rev. Biophys. 48 (2): https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583514000158.
79 Carnevali, M., Parsons, J., Wyles, D.L., and Hermann, T. (2010). A modular
approach to synthetic RNA binders of the hepatitis C virus internal ribo­some entry site. ChemBioChem 11 (10): 1364–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ cbic.201000177.
80 Gaied, N.B., Glasser, N., Ramalanjaona, N. et al. (2005). 8-vinyl-deoxyadenosine,
an alternative uorescent nucleoside analog to 2′-deoxyribosyl-2-aminopurine with improved properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (3): https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/ gki253.
81 Nadler, A., Strohmeier, J., and Diederichsen, U. (2011).
8-vinyl-2′-deoxyguanosine as a uorescent 2′-deoxyguanosine mimic for investi­gating DNA hybridization and topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (23): https:// doi.org/10.1002/anie.201100078.
82 Noé, M.S., Sinkeldam, R.W., and Tor , Y. (2013). Oligodeoxynucleotides contain-
ing multiple thiophene-modied isomorphic uorescent nucleosides. J. Org. Chem. 78 (16): https://doi.org/10.1021/jo4008964.
83 Soulière, M.F., Haller, A., Rieder, R., and Micura, R. (2011). A powerful
approach for the selection of 2-aminopurine substitution sites to investigate RNA folding. JACS 133 (40): 16161–16167. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2063583.
84 Soulière, M.F. and Micura, R. (2014). Use of SHAPE to select 2AP substitution
sites for RNA-ligand interactions and dynamics studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 1103: 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-730-3_17 .
85 Wicks, S.L. and Hargrove, A.E. (2019). Fluorescent indicator displacement
assays to identify and characterize small molecule interactions with RNA. Methods 167: 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.018.
86 Shindy, H.A. (2017). Fundamentals in the chemistry of cyanine dyes: a review.
Dyes Pigm. 145: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.06.029.
87 Dash, S., Panigrahi, M., Baliyarsingh, S. et al. (2011). Cyanine dyes – nucleic
acids interactions. Curr. Org. Chem. 15 (15): https://doi.org/10.2174/
138527211796367336.
88 Pei, R. and Stojanovic, M.N. (2008). Study of thiazole orange in aptamer-based
dye-displacement assays. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 390 (4): https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00216-007-1773-2 .
89 Sarpong, K. and Datta, B. (2012). Nucleic-acid-binding chromophores as e-
indicators of aptamer-target interactions. J. Nucleic Acids 2012: https://doi
cient .org/10.1155/2012/247280.
90 Asare-Okai, P.N. and Chow, C.S. (2011). A modied uorescent intercalator
displacement assay for RNA ligand discovery. Anal. Biochem. 408 (2): 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.09.020.
88 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
91 Tran, T. and Disney, M.D. (2012). Identifying the preferred RNA motifs and
chemotypes that interact by probing millions of combinations. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2119.
92 Hani, H.S., Graves, A., and Disney, M.D. (2018). Selective small molecule
recognition of RNA base pairs. ACS Comb. Sci. 20 (8): https://doi.org/10.1021/ acscombsci.8b00049.
93 Pinto, M.M.M., Sousa, M.E., and Nascimento, M.S.J. (2005). Xanthone deriva-
tives: new insights in biological activities. Curr. Med. Chem. 12 (21): https://doi .org/10.2174/092986705774370691.
94 Pace, T.C.S., Monahan, S.L., MacRae, A.I. et al. (2006). Photophysics of
aminoxanthone derivatives and their application as binding probes for DNA†. Photochem. Photobiol. 82 (1): https://doi.org/10.1562/2005-05-16-ra-529.
95 Zhang, J., Umemoto, S., and Nakatani, K. (2010). Fluorescent indicator dis-
placement assay for ligand-RNA interactions. JACS 132 (11): 3660–3661. https:// doi.org/10.1021/ja100089u.
96 Murata, A., Fukuzumi, T., Umemoto, S., and Nakatani, K. (2013). Xanthone
derivatives as potential inhibitors of miRNA processing by human Dicer: target­ing secondary structures of pre-miRNA by small molecules. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (1): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.10.108.
97 Umemoto, S., Im, S., Zhang, J. et al. (2012). Structure-activity studies on
the uorescent indicator in a displacement assay for the screening of small molecules binding to RNA. Chem. A Eur. J. 18 (32): https://doi.org/10.1002/ chem.201103932.
98 Murata, A., Harada, Y., Fukuzumi, T., and Nakatani, K. (2013). Fluorescent
indicator displacement assay of ligands targeting 10 microRNA precursors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21 (22): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.09.007.
99 Fukuzumi, T., Murata, A., Aikawa, H. et al. (2015). Exploratory study on the
RNA-binding structural motifs by library screening targeting pre-miRNA-29 a. Chem. A Eur. J. 21 (47): https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201502913.
100 Jerabek-Willemsen, M., André, T., Wanner, R. et al. (2014). MicroScale ther-
mophoresis: Interaction analysis and beyond. J. Mol. Struct. 1077: 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.03.009.
101 Duhr, S. and Braun, D. (2006). Why molecules move along a temperature gradi-
ent. PNAS 103: 19678–19682. www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0603873103.
102 Moon, M.H., Hilimire, T.A., Sanders, A.M., and Schneekloth, J.S. (2018).
Measuring RNA-ligand interactions with microscale thermophoresis. Biochemistry 57 (31): 4638–4643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01141.
103 Hani, H.S., Tong, Y., Liu, X. et al. (2020). Targeting the SARS-COV-2 RNA
genome with small molecule binders and ribonuclease targeting chimera (RiboTAC) degraders. ACS Cent. Sci. 6 (10): 1713–1721. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acscentsci.0c00984.
104 Umuhire Juru, A., Patwardhan, N.N., and Hargrove, A.E. (2019). Understanding
the contributions of conformational changes, thermodynamics, and kinetics of RNA-small molecule interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 14 (5): https://doi.org/10 .1021/acschembio.8b00945.
References 89
https://t.me/med1917
105 Sokoloski, J.E. and Bevilacqua, P.C. (2012). Analysis of RNA folding and ligand
binding by conventional and high-throughput calorimetry. Methods Mol. Biol. 905: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-949-5_10 .
106 Salim, N.N. and Feig, A.L. (2009). Isothermal titration calorimetry of RNA.
Methods 47 (3): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.09.003.
107 Wiseman, T., Williston, S., Brandts, J.F., and Lin, L.N. (1989). Rapid
measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titra­tion calorimeter. Anal. Biochem. 179 (1): https://doi.org/10.1016/0003­2697(89)90213-3.
108 Tellinghuisen, J. (2005). Statistical error in isothermal titration calorimetry: vari-
ance function estimation from generalized least squares. Anal. Biochem. 343 (1): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.026.
109 Liberman, J.A., Bogue, J.T., Jenkins, J.L. et al. (2014). ITC analysis of ligand
binding to PreQ1 riboswitches. Methods Enzymol. 549 (C): https://doi.org/10 .1016/B978-0-12-801122-5.00018-0 .
110 Hermann, T. and Westhof, E. (1998). Aminoglycoside binding to the hammer-
head ribozyme: a general model for the interaction of cationic antibiotics with RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 276 (5): https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1590.
111 Lynch, S.R. and Puglisi, J.D. (2001). Structural origins of aminoglycoside speci-
city for prokaryotic ribosomes. J. Mol. Biol. 306 (5): https://doi.org/10.1006/ jmbi.2000.4420.
112 Kaul, M. and Pilch, D.S. (2002). Thermodynamics of aminoglycoside-rRNA
recognition: the binding of neomycin-class aminoglycosides to the A site of 16S rRNA. Biochemistry 41 (24): https://doi.org/10.1021/bi020130f.
113 (a) Velagapudi, S. P., Li, Y., & Disney, M. D. (2019). A cross-linking approach
to map small molecule-RNA binding sites in cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 29(12), 1532–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.04.001; for other instances of chem-CLIP, see: (b) Tong, Y., Gibaut, Q.M.R., Rouse, W. et al. (2022). Transcriptome-Wide Mapping of Small-Molecule RNA-Binding Sites in Cells Informs an Isoform-Specic Degrader of QSOX1 mRNA. JACS 144 (26): 11620–11625. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c01929; c Bush, J.A., Aikawa, H., Fuerst, R. et al. (2021). Ribonuclease recruitment using a small molecule reduced c9ALS/FTD r(G4C2) repeat expansion in vitro and in vivo ALS mod­els. Sci. Transl. Med. 13 (617): eabd5991. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed .abd5991.
114 Mortison, J.D., Schenone, M., Myers, J.A. et al. (2018). Tetracyclines modify
translation by targeting key human rRNA substructures. Cell Chem. Biol. 25 (12): 1506–1518.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.09.010.
115 Wang, J., Schultz, P.G., and Johnson, K.A. (2018). Mechanistic studies of a
small-molecule modulator of SMN2 splicing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 (20): E4604–E4612. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800260115.
116 Balaratnam, S., Rhodes, C., Bume, D.D. et al. (2021). A chemical probe based
on the PreQ1 metabolite enables transcriptome-wide mapping of binding sites. Nat. Commun. 12 (1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25973-x .
90 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
117 Zhang, P., Park, H.-J., Zhang, J. et al. (2020). Translation of the intrinsically dis-
ordered protein α-synuclein is inhibited by a small molecule targeting its struc­tured mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (3): 1457–1467. https://doi.org/10 .1073/pnas.1905057117.
118 Plowright, A.T., Johnstone, C., Kihlberg, J. et al. (2012). Hypothesis driven drug
design: improving quality and eectiveness of the design-make-test-analyse cycle. Drug Discovery Today 17 (1–2): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis .2011.09.012.
119 Di, L. and Kerns, E.H. (2008). Drug-Like Properties: Concepts, Structure Design
and Methods: From ADME to Toxicity Optimization. Burlington: Elsevier.
120 (a)Ratni, H., Ebeling, M., Baird, J. et al. (2018). Discovery of risdiplam,
a selective survival of motor neuron-2 (SMN2) gene splicing modier for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). J. Med. Chem. 61 (15): 6501–6517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00741.For references on risdiplam, see: (b) Ratni, H., Scalco, R.S., and Stephan, A.H. (2021). Risdiplam, the rst approved small molecule splicing modier drug as a blueprint for future transformative medicines. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (6): 874–877. https:// doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00659.
121 Cheung, A.K., Hurley, B., Kerrigan, R. et al. (2018). Discovery of small
molecule splicing modulators of survival motor neuron-2 (SMN2) for the treat­ment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). J. Med. Chem. 61 (24): 11021–11036. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01291.
122 Ernst, J.T., Thompson, P.A., Nilewski, C. et al. (2020). Design of development
candidate eFT226, a rst in class inhibitor of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A RNA helicase. J. Med. Chem. 63 (11): 5879–5955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs .jmedchem.0c00182.
123 (a) Bordeleau, M.-E., Mori, A., Oberer, M. et al. (2006). Functional charac-
terization of IRESes by an inhibitor of the RNA helicase eIF4A. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2 (4): 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio776. (b) Bordeleau, M.-E., Robert, F., Gerard, B. et al. (2008). Therapeutic suppression of translation initi­ation modulates chemosensitivity in a mouse lymphoma model. J. Clin. Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci34753.
124 . Garenne, D., Haines, M. C., Romantseva, E. F., Freemont, P., Strychalski, E.
A., & Noireaux, V. (2021). Cell-free gene expression. In Nature Reviews Methods Primers (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021­00046-x
125 Gurtu, V., Yan, G., and Zhang, G. (1996). IRES bicistronic expression vectors
for ecient creation of stable mammalian cell lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 229 (1): 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1996.1795.
126 Green, K.M., Sheth, U.J., Flores, B.N. et al. (2019). High-throughput screening
yields several small-molecule inhibitors of repeat-associated non-AUG trans­lation. J. Biol. Chem. 294 (49): 18624–18638. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119 .009951.
References 91
https://t.me/med1917
127 Schwinn, M.K., Steen, L.S., Zimmerman, K. et al. (2020). A simple and scal-
able strategy for analysis of endogenous protein dynamics. Sci. Rep. 10 (1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65832-1 .
128 (a)Singh, G. and Cooper, T.A. (2006). Minigene reporter for identication and
analysis of cis elements and trans factors aecting pre-mRNA splicing. BioTech- niques 41 (2): 177–181. 10.2144/000112208.For references on splicing reporters, see: (b) Nasim, M.T. and Eperon, I.C. (2006). A double-reporter splicing assay for determining splicing eciency in mammalian cells. Nat. Protoc. 1 (2): 1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.148.
129 Kakazu, J., Walker, N.L., Babin, K.C. et al. (2021). Risdiplam for the use of
spinal muscular atrophy. Orthoped. Rev. 13 (2): 10.52965/001c.25579.
130 Nguyen, U., Squaglia, N., Boge, A., and Fung, P.A. (2011). The simple
westernTM: a gel-free, blot-free, hands-free Western blotting reinvention. Nat. Methods 8 (11): v–vi. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.353.
131 Cohen, L. and Walt, D.R. (2019). Highly sensitive and multiplexed protein mea-
surements. Chem. Rev. 119 (1): 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev .8b00257.
132 Beaudet, L., Rodriguez-Suarez, R., Venne, M.-H. et al. (2008). AlphaLISA
immunoassays: the no-wash alternative to ELISAs for research and drug discov­ery. Nat. Methods 5 (12): an8–an9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.230.
133 Zhang, G., Ueberheide, B.M., Waldemarson, S. et al. (2010). Protein quantita-
tion using mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 673: 211–222. https://doi.org/
10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_13 .
134 (a)Vincent, F., Nueda, A., Lee, J. et al. (2022). Phenotypic drug discovery:
recent successes, lessons learned and new directions. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00472-w .For reviews on phenotypic screens, see: (b) Eggert, U.S. (2013). The why and how of phenotypic small-molecule screens. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9 (4): 206–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1206.
135 Mousseau, G., Clementz, M.A., Bakeman, W. N. et al. (2012). An analog of the
natural steroidal alkaloid cortistatin a potently suppresses tat-dependent HIV transcription. Cell Host Microbe 12 (1): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom .2012.05.016.
136 (a) Rankovic, Z. and Morhpy, R. (2010). Lead Generation Approaches in Drug
Discovery. Weinheim: Wiley. (b) Deprez-Poulain, R. and Deprez, B. (2004).
Facts, gures and trends in lead generation. Curr. Top . Med. Chem. 4. (c) Meanwell, N.A. (2011). Improving drug candidates by design: a focus on physic­ochemical properties as a means of improving compound disposition and safety. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 24 (9): 1420–1456. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx200211v.
137 Hughes, J.P., Rees, S.S., Kalindjian, S.B., and Philpott, K.L. (2011). Principles
of early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 162 (6): 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10 .1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x.
138 Stark, R., Grzelak, M., and Hadeld, J. (2019). RNA sequencing: the teenage
years. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20 (11): 631–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019- 0150-2.
92 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
139 (a) Bowes, J., Brown, A.J., Hamon, J. et al. (2012). Reducing safety-related drug
attrition: The use of in vitro pharmacological proling. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 11 (12): 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3845. (b) Bendels, S., Bissantz, C., Fasching, B. et al. (2019). Safety screening in early drug discovery: an optimized assay panel. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 99: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn .2019.106609.
140 Schrank, B., Gotz, R., Gunnersen, J.M. et al. (1997). Inactivation of the survival
motor neuron gene, a candidate gene for human spinal muscular atrophy, leads to massive cell death in early mouse embryos. PNAS 94: 9920–9925.
141 Hua, Y., Vickers, T.A., Okunola, H.L. et al. (2008). Antisense masking of an
hnRNP A1/A2 intronic splicing silencer corrects SMN2 splicing in transgenic mice. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82 (4): 834–848.
142 Ratni, H., Mueller, L., and Ebeling, M. (2019). Rewriting the (tran)script: appli-
cation to spinal muscular atrophy. Prog. Med. Chem. 58: 119–156. https://doi .org/10.1016/bs.pmch.2018.12.003.
143 Sivaramakrishnan, M., McCarthy, K.D., Campagne, S. et al. (2017). Binding to
SMN2 pre-mRNA-protein complex elicits specicity for small molecule splicing modiers. Nat. Commun. 8 (1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01559-4.
144 Palacino, J., Swalley, S.E., Song, C. et al. (2015). SMN2 splice modulators
enhance U1–pre-mRNA association and rescue SMA mice. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11 (7): 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1837.
145 Schulz, G., Victoria, C., Kirschning, A., and Steinmann, E. (2021). Rocaglamide
and silvestrol: a long story from anti-tumor to anti-coronavirus compounds. Nat. Prod. Rep. 38 (1): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NP00024H.
146 Liu, T., Nair, S.J., Lescarbeau, A. et al. (2012). Synthetic silvestrol analogues
as potent and selective protein synthesis inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 55 (20): 8859–8878. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm3011542.
5
https://t.me/med1917
Chemical Matter That Binds RNA
Emily G. Swanson Hay, Zhengguo Cai, and Amanda E. Hargrove
Duke University, Department of Chemistry, 124 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27705, USA
5.1 Introduction
Therapeutic drugs act on specic molecular targets to impact or alter the correspond­ing biological pathways, thus delivering pharmacological eects toward the disease phenotypes of interest. Most of the small-molecule drugs in clinical use target pro­teins. In total <700 proteins are currently targeted, representing merely 0.05% of the human genome [1]. In contrast, over 70% of the human genome is transcribed into RNA, and RNA-targeted therapies could greatly expand the range of drug develop­ment. Interest in RNAs as potential drug targets has been increasing in part due to the mounting evidence that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) pervasively regulate gene expression and protein function in cells, participating in disease development and viral infections. The feasibility of RNA-targeted therapies has been demonstrated by the successful deployment of multiple modalities, including antisense oligonu­cleotides, small interfering RNAs, and RNA aptamers [2].
There is also growing interest in developing small-molecule-based therapies because of improved oral administration and cell permeability, as well as to expand the number of targets to include highly structured RNAs that might not be readily targeted by antisense-based strategies. Many RNAs bear structural motifs that could form binding pockets or clefts suitable for selective small-molecule binding [1]. The chemical nature of RNA, including the dynamic structure and densely charged backbone, requires ligands with specic physiochemical properties that might be limited in current screening libraries. Many eorts have been made to understand what types of molecular design could favor RNA targeting based on cheminformatic analysis, which led to multiple collections of literature-reported ligands, such as the RNA-Targeting BIoactive LigaNd Database (R-BIND), [3–5], Nucleic Acid Ligand Database (NALDB) [6] and Small Molecule Modulators of RNA (SMMRNA) [7], as well as curated libraries to increase hit rates of screening, such as Inforna [8, 9] and the Duke RNA-Targeted Library (DRTL) [10]. The increasing pool of reported RNA-targeted small molecules with diverse chemical structures provides a reliable data source for such analysis and elicits a distinguished chemical space occupied
93
RNA as a Drug Target: The Next Frontier for Medicinal Chemistry, First Edition. Edited by John Schneekloth and Martin Pettersson. © 2024 WILEY-VCH GmbH. Published 2024 by WILEY-VCH GmbH.
94 5 Chemical Matter That Binds RNA
https://t.me/med1917
by ligands that are able to bind to RNA, which can be further rened by those demonstrating biological activity.
In this chapter, we focus on RNA ligands and discuss what type of chemical enti­ties should be pursued for RNA targeting. We will rst review common chemical scaolds and their structural features with varied RNA-binding properties, from nat­urally discovered ligands to synthetic small molecules. Representative works on the construction of focused libraries will be introduced to explain library curation meth­ods and the improved hit rates this strategy can achieve, followed by the discussion of methods to explore novel chemical space, a case study highlighting classes of lig­ands presented in this chapter, and future directions for the eld of small-molecule RNA targeting.
5.2 Natural Ligands
Many of the early insights into RNA–small-molecule targeting came from explor­ing naturally occurring RNA–small-molecule interactions. From antibiotics to riboswitch ligands, there are many examples of how diverse and complex small molecules can bind RNA to regulate biological systems. Additionally, by utilizing the chemical diversity of ligands generated through complex biosynthetic pathways, new RNA-binding molecules can be identied. Disney and coworkers recently performed a screen with the Scripps Research Natural Products Discovery Center collections and identied a natural product, nocathiacin I, that selectively targeted pre-miR-18a and had bioactivity in a prostate cancer cell line [11]. This work exemplies how the potential of natural products may be harnessed for targeting RNA, and how expanding beyond common antibiotic scaolds may aord more selective ligands. Further examination of the functional binding interactions that have evolved for RNA and small molecules, alongside investigating novel RNA–natural product interactions, may help inform future ligand design for novel RNA targets.
5.2.1 Aminoglycosides
Aminoglycosides represent a major class of RNA-binding natural products con­sisting of oligosaccharides that contain amine groups, giving the molecules hydrogen-bonding capability as well as positive charge(s) that drive electrostatic interactions with RNA molecules [12–14]. In fact, aminoglycosides were among the rst known small molecules to aect biology through RNA binding [15]. Extracted from various bacteria, aminoglycosides serve as antibiotics through a variety of mechanisms that result in the disruption of protein synthesis through binding to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), often in the aminoacyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) site (A-site), thereby interfering with bacterial function [12, 16]. Due to aminoglycosides con­taining oligosaccharide units, they often have much higher stereocenter and oxygen counts than other RNA-targeting ligands, while their positive charge can make them promiscuous RNA binders [3, 17]. Many naturally occurring aminoglycosides have