Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5402_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
4.5 Defining SAR and Functional Assays 75
https://t.me/med1917
4.5 Defining SAR and Functional Assays
Compounds that bind to a target RNA and demonstrate target engagement should be
tested in at least one functional assay (preferably more to mitigate false positives) to
determine if the observed binding leads to a change in the level of protein expression.
Once an RNA binder demonstrates on-target functional activity (as further demonstrated by in-cell target engagement, vide supra), the RNA binder is fully validated.
By acquiring functional data in tandem with binding data, SAR can be developed and
applied to new designs, thus propelling the design-make-test-analyze cycle [118].
Researchers may apply the same principles from protein target-based drug discovery to optimizing RNA binders by designing and making structural changes to the
binder, gathering and analyzing data, and then formulating new structural changes
to improve binding, drug-like properties [119], and functional activity. For RNA
drug discovery, this is best exemplied by risdiplam [120] and branaplam [121],
splice modulators that will be further discussed in Chapter 7. Further, Ernst and
colleagues optimized [122] rocaglamide A and congeners, a class of natural products
that inhibits protein synthesis by forming a stable ternary complex with polypurine
rich messenger RNAs and eIF4A [123]. The authors made derivatives with improved
drug-like properties and discovered eFT226 (zotatin) that is currently in clinical
development to treat cancer.
4.5.1 Functional Assays
A functional assay can be designed based on the RNA target of interest and the
mechanistic hypothesis. Cellular gene-reporter assays are commonly employed,
wherein the level of protein expression is assessed via a surrogate reporter. These
can be tested in a cell-free environment rst [124]. Fluorescent proteins and
luciferases are examples of such reporters and can be introduced via methods such
as viral transduction, transient transfection, or endogenous gene editing. A second
reporter driven by an IRES in a bicistronic expression vector can help normalize
signal [125]. For example, Todd and co-authors used a dual luciferase reporter
assay to conrm if small molecule BIX01294 could inhibit +1CGG translation
(as measured by NanoLuciferase luminescence) in HEK293 cells, and at 25μM,
+1CGG RNA translation was signicantly reduced although the compound was
found to be moderately toxic by measure of FireyLuciferase luminescence and cell
morphology [126]. A popular version of luciferase reporter called HiBiT utilizes a
split luciferase concept, whereby a small N-terminal sequence of NanoLuciferase
can be expressed at the endogenous locus of the target gene and reconstituted
with the remainder of the NanoLuciferase in the form of a recombinant protein
along with a substrate. This gives a bioluminescent readout for the tagged target
protein [127].
Minigene splicing reporters are used to assess compounds that have an eect on
mRNA splicing [128]. Precursors for risdiplam, a drug used to treat SMA [129],
were identied using a high-throughput screen with a luciferase reporter minigene.
Although the discovery was made via a cell-based screen, one could apply such an
76 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
assay to assess functional activity from binding rst approaches. Additional methods
of assessing the function of RNA-binding small molecules include immunoassays,
which are used to determine the protein levels of the target of interest. These types
of assays include western blotting, Simple WesternsTM[130], and many forms of
sandwich ELISA such as traditional ELISAs, electrochemiluminescence-based
MSD [131], and bead-based (no-wash) AlphaLISA [132]. Mass spectrometry and
proteomics are also used for assessing levels of protein coded by a target RNA [133].
These methods are important for conrming changes in the levels of proteins in
endogenous settings of cells or animals. Emerging technologies are sure to make
this evaluation more robust and easier.
4.5.2 Phenotypic Screens
Phenotypic screens [134] are functional assays that identify compounds based on
an observed phenotype (biological eect) without knowledge of molecular target
or mechanism (agnostic screening). These screens have also been used to discover
RNA binders despite being agnostic to a small molecule’s target. Phenotypic screens
can be formatted to be high throughput, and in the cases of risdiplam [120] and
branaplam [121], phenotypic screens identied hits that were further optimized
to the respective lead series. After several rounds of optimization, risdiplam was
approved for treatment of SMA (cf. Section 4.6 and Chapter 7). Careful target
engagement and mechanism of action studies should be carried out to determine
whether a molecule is acting through an RNA interaction mechanism. For example,
didehydro-cortistatin A (dCA) inhibits production of new viral particles from
HIV-1-infected cells, but Mousseau and coworkers demonstrated that dCA disrupts
transcription of the integrated HIV-1 genome by binding to the TAR-binding
domain of Tat, not to TAR RNA [135].
4.6 Identifying a Lead Series
Forsmall molecules, it is well known what constitutes a good lead series [136]. A lead
series is identied once RNA binding is conrmed by at least two orthogonal biophysical methods (cf. Section 4.3), has SAR that repeats across dierent methods, is
selective for a target RNA, shows target engagement in cells connected to a cellular
response (cf. Sections 4.4 and 4.5), and has reasonable pharmacokinetic properties.
Figure 4.10 outlines the process for identifying a lead series with the goal of ultimately delivering a compound for clinical development.
Hit conrmation involves structure conrmation by resynthesis and purication,
which is critical to ensure that the presumed structure is correct. Conrmed hits
should also demonstrate binding to an RNA by at least two orthogonal biophysical
methods. Further, SAR around similar analogs should be consistent across dierent
biophysical methods. Hit optimization entails improvements in SAR regarding
binding anity and functional activity. Compounds in this stage should also
demonstrate target engagement (cf. Sections 4.4 and 4.5) and should be screened
4.6 Identifying a Lead Series 77
https://t.me/med1917
Hit confirmation: structure
confirmation by resynthesis and
purification, binding by 2
orthogonal biophysical methods,
tractable SAR
Lead optimization: lead series
identified with detailed SAR,
reasonable pharmacokinetics,
selective, cellular response linked
to in-cell target engagement
Figure 4.10 Process for identifying a lead series with the goal of making a compound for
clinical development. First, a hit is found, confirmed, and optimized using methods
discussed in Sections 4.1 through 4.5. The lead series is further optimized to a drug
candidate that should demonstrate activity and selectivity in vitro and in vivo and have
toxicological data acquired in multiple species.
Hit optimization: improve SAR in
binding affinity and functional
activity, demonstrate target
engagement, improve selectivity,
improve pharmacokinetic
properties
Drug candidate: demonstrated
activity and selectivity in vitro
and in vivo
for selectivity for the RNA of interest among other RNAs in the transcriptome.
Pharmacokinetic properties should also be tested for and improved in this stage.
A lead series is selected after gathering detailed SAR across binding and functional
assays, reasonable pharmacokinetics, selectivity information regarding RNA targets
and protein targets, and linking any cellular response to in-cell target engagement.
Ultimately, the lead series can be further optimized to a drug candidate that should
demonstrate activity and selectivity in vitro and in vivo and have toxicological data
acquired in multiple species.
4.6.1 Hit Optimization
Also known as hit-to-lead [137], the goal of hit optimization is to improve an RNA
binder’sanity,functional activity,selectivity,and pharmacokinetic properties with
the eventual goal being to assess in vivo ecacy. Work in this phase consists of
SAR investigations around an RNA binder, combining data gathered from binding
and functional assays, and making new structural hypotheses to further improve
a compound. If structural information about an RNA is known, structure-based
drug design techniques can be applied to develop the SAR faster and in a more
focused way.
Selectivity and toxicity should also be interrogated, optimized, and mitigated,
respectively, at this point. Selectivity may be assessed through several methods.
First, a selectivity panel of RNAs can be tested for binding by a hit analog using
one of the biophysical methods previously mentioned in this chapter. Second, a
PEARL-seq probe (or a similar probe mentioned in Section 4.4) may be developed
78 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
for a hit analog that assesses target engagement across the transcriptome [23].
Third, RNA-seq [138] may be used to assess selectivity by measuring global gene
expression changes induced by treatment with an RNA binder. Fourth, traditional methods may be used to interrogate selectivity and toxicity such as in vitro
pharmacological proling by using o-target screening panels [139].
4.6.2 Risdiplam Hit-to-Lead
SMA is a genetic disease caused by mutation or deletion of the survival motor neuron
1 (SMN1) gene and is a leading genetic cause of infant and toddler mortality [120b].
Survival motor neuron (SMN) protein is expressed in all body tissues and is essential for development and functional homeostasis in many species [140]. In humans,
SMN protein is produced by two genes: SMN1 and SMN2, although the latter gene
produces low levels of full-length mRNA due to alternative splicing of exon 7. Nusinersen, an RNA antisense oligonucleotide, was the rst approved treatment for SMA
and works by inhibiting a splicing silencer that allows for SMN2 exon 7 splicing, thus
expressing SMN protein [141]. Although a breakthrough drug, nusinersen must be
administered intrathecally, i.e. by injection in the cerebrospinal uid of the spine.
Risdiplam, an FDA approved oral small-molecule splice modulator of SMN2 exon
7, was discovered rst by using a high-throughput phenotypic screen designed to
identify small-molecule compounds that increase the inclusion of exon 7 during
SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing in an SMN2 minigene reporter assay (HEK293 cells)
[120b]. Ratni and co-authors identied coumarin derivative R-1 as a promising hit
(Figure 4.11). In parallel, SAR was started on both the coumarin and benzoxazole
moieties of the molecule, along with scaold hopping around the coumarin core.
Isocoumarin SMN-C1, coumarin SMN-C2, and pyridopyrimidinone SMN-C3 were
Et
N
Et
SMN2 splicing EC
SMN protein EC
Figure 4.11 Initial coumarin hit R-1 and lead series containing a pyridopyrimidine core.
Although potent, SMN-C1 and SMN-C2 possessed selectivity and chemical instability
problems that the pyridopyrimidine core lead series did not have. The pyridopyrimidine
series was further optimized to arrive at risdiplam, the first small molecule approved
treatment for SMA that increases the inclusion of exon 7 during SMN2 pre-mRNA splicing.
N
Et
N
N
Me
SMN2 protein EC
Lead series:
Me
N
N
O
SMN-C3
Me
N
N
O
r-2
Me
N
Me
N
N
N
Me
N
Me
Phase I clinical trials
N
HN
Paused for renal toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys
Me
N
N
: 30 nM
1.5 x
: 84 nM
1.5 x
Me
N
N
O
RG7800
N
N
O
Risdiplam
Et
N
N
Me
N
N
N
Me
N
Me
Me
N
Me
N
N
O
N
O
O
O
r-1
: 0.22 µM
1.5 x
: > 10 µM
1.5 x
N
N
Me
SMN2 splicing EC
SMN protein EC
Me
N
N
Et
SMN2 splicing EC
SMN2 protein EC
- Ames positive
- Instability in plasma
O
SMN-C1
1.5 x
O
SMN-C2
- Phototoxicity
: 25 nM
1.5 x
: 120 nM
Me
N
Me
N
N
O
: 10 nM SMN2 splicing EC
1.5 x
: 44 nM
1.5 x
4.6 Identifying a Lead Series 79
https://t.me/med1917
identied as orally bioavailable and all three analogs modied SMN2 splicing in
SMA patient-derived cells [142]. However, SMN-C1 and SMN-C2 exhibited Ames
toxicity (genotoxicity), phototoxicity, and chemical instability in plasma and
aqueous buers. Further optimization of these series resulted in either potent
compounds that still exhibited Ames toxicity or compounds that were ineective
in the in vitro SMN2 minigene reporter assay. Pyridopyrimidone core-containing
compounds SMN-C3 and R-2 were free of the phototoxicity and plasma stability
issues that halted progression of the SMN-C1 and ‘C2 series. Further optimization of
the series brought forth candidate RG7800, which was tested in Phase I clinical trials
for spinal SMA. However, due to observed renal toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys,
researchers paused further clinical trials involving RG7800. From RG7800, Ratni
and co-workers further optimized the series to improve selectivity vs. o-target
genes as measured through transcriptome-wide RNA-seq using type 1 SMA patient
broblasts [143] and improved on-target potency, thus allowing clinicians to lower
the ecacious dose in patients.
4.6.3 Branaplam Lead Generation
Like risdiplam, researchers at Novartis performed an HTS to identify small-molecule
modulators that increase the SMN2 exon 7 inclusion using an NSC34 motor neuron
cell line expressing an SMN2 minigene reporter [144]. Primary hits were conrmed,
and among those hits identied was pyridazine B-1 (Figure 4.12) which possessed
SMN EC50of 600 nM (2.5 fold expression), but also suered from high in vivo
clearance, low brain exposure, and potent hERG inhibition [120a].
Cheung and co-authors improved the SMN Elisa potency (SMN Δ7 mouse
myoblast assay) by replacing the benzothiophene with an ortho-phenol. Further,
S
SMN Elisa EC50: 600 nM, 2.5 fold
hERG IC50: 600 nM
S
SMN Elisa EC50: 1.1 µM, 2.4 fold
mouse CL: 100 ml/min/kg
hERG IC
Poor CNS exposure
Figure 4.12 Initial pyridazine hit B-1 and derivative B-2 were targeted as the lead series
resulting in the discovery of branaplam.
N
N
N
B-1
N
B-2
50
H
N
Me Me
Me
N
Me Me
= 110 nM
NH
NH
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
O
N
N
N
HN
SMN Elisa EC50: 20 nM, 2.6 fold
oral BAV (mouse): 18%
OH
Branaplam
hERG IC50: 6 µM
NH
Me Me
Me
80 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
Me
Me
N
HO
Me
O
Me
HO
O
O
Ph
O
Me
Me
O
HO
O
HO
N
Ph
O
Me
Me
N
O
Me
(–)-Rocaglamide A
Cell IC50: 20 nM
Poor physicochemical properties
Poor metabolic stability
Zotatifin
Cell IC50: 11 nM
>20 mg/ml aqueous solubility
CL (rat): 48 ml/min/kg
CN
Figure 4.13 Rocaglamide natural product lead series (represented by (—)-rocaglamide A)
was optimized to zotatifin (eFT226), an inhibitor of RNA helicase eIF4A, currently in clinical
trials for cancer and SARS-CoV-2.
researchers at Novartis reduced hERG inhibition by adding electron withdrawing
polar groups on the western aromatic side of the molecule. Lastly, changing
the N-methylamine linker (cf. compound B-2, Figure 4.12) to an oxygen led to
branaplam, which exhibited improved brain exposure and ecacy in the SMN Δ7
mouse model. Currently, clinical trials with branaplam as treatments for both SMA
and Huntington’s Disease are paused.
4.6.4 Zotatifin Lead Generation
(—)-Rocaglamide A and congeners, a class of natural products that inhibits protein
synthesis by forming a stable ternary complex with polypurine-rich messenger
RNAs and eIF4A [123b], have been shown to be potent antiproliferative and antiviral agents [145]. Researchers at eFFECTOR Therapeutics chose the rocaglamide
scaold as a lead series to further optimize resulting in the discovery of zotatin, the
rst eIF4A inhibitor tested in human clinical trials (Figure 4.13) [122]. To optimize
rocaglamide A, Ernst and co-authors focused on improving the poor solubility
and metabolic stability by exploring new ways to decrease the lipophilicity of the
molecule. Ultimately, the molecule was made to be more polar and soluble through
changing the western dimethoxy phenyl to dimethoxy pyridine and converting the
amide to a basic N,N-dimethyl amine. Further, the p-methoxyphenyl was changed
to a p-cyanophenyl to simultaneously improve potency and lower lipophilicity,
which has been previously explored by other research groups [146]. Zotatin is
currently in Phase II clinical trials for breast cancer and SARS-CoV-2.
4.7 Concluding Thoughts and Outlook
In this chapter, we outlined knowledge-based and agnostic screening approaches
for the identication of RNA binders, including both virtual screening methods
and high-throughput screening methods. Further, we have shown methods used to
References 81
https://t.me/med1917
assess binding anity, binding site(s) of an RNA ligand, target engagement, and
functional activity – all of which are necessary in generating lead RNA binders to
progress for lead optimization and eventually clinical development. The future of
RNA drug discovery is promising as we continue to develop methods for generating
and optimizing RNA binders.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Joel Dufour, Scott Gorman, Sarah Mahoney, Anthony Montibello, Herschel Mukherjee, Scott Rusin, and Yaqiang Wang for their suggestions
and edits on various parts of the manuscript. We also want to thank Craig Blain,
Nick Marsh, Lee Roberts, and Erik Spek for their review of the manuscript and suggested edits. Lastly, we would like to thank Nick Marsh and Lee Roberts for their
guidance in organizing the manuscript.
References
1 Daldrop, P., Reyes, F.E., Robinson, D.A. et al. (2011). Novel ligands for a purine
riboswitch discovered by RNA-ligand docking. Chem. Biol. 18 (3): https://doi
.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.12.020.
2 Gilbert, S.D., Stoddard, C.D., Wise, S.J., and Batey, R.T. (2006). Thermodynamic
and kinetic characterization of ligand binding to the purine riboswitch aptamer
domain. J. Mol. Biol. 359 (3): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.003.
3 Pereira, D.A. and Williams, J.A. (2007). Origin and evolution of high through-
put screening. Br. J. Pharmacol. 152 (1): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp
.0707373.
4 Fenn, J.B., Mann, M., Meng, C.K. et al. (1989). Electrospray ionization for mass
spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246 (4926): 64–71. https://doi.org/10
.1126/science.2675315.
5 Banerjee, S. and Mazumdar, S. (2012). Electrospray ionization mass spectrome-
try: a technique to access the information beyond the molecular weight of the
analyte. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2012: 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/282574.
6 Ganem, B., Li, Y.T., and Henion, J.D. (1991). Detection of noncovalent
receptor-ligand complexes by mass spectrometry. JACS 113 (16): 6294–6296.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00016a069.
7 Cheng, X., Chen, R., Bruce, J.E. et al. (1995). Using electrospray ionization
FTICR mass spectrometry to study competitive binding of inhibitors to carbonic
anhydrase. JACS 117 (34): 8859–8860. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00139a023.
8 Herschlag, D., Bonilla, S., and Bisaria, N. (2018). The story of RNA folding, as
told in epochs. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 10 (10): https://doi.org/10
.1101/cshperspect.a032433.
9 Sannes Lowery, K.A., Cummins, L.L., Chen, S. et al. (2005). Integrated Strate-
gies for Drug Discovery Using Mass Spectrometry. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
82 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
10 Marshall, A.G., Hendrickson, C.L., and Jackson, G.S. (1998). Fourier transform
ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 17
(1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1998)17:1<1::AID-MAS1>
3.0.CO;2-K.
11 Griey, R.H., Sannes-Lowery, K.A., Drader, J.J. et al. (2000). Characterization
of low-anity complexes between RNA and small molecules using electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry. JACS 122 (41): 9933–9938. https://doi.org/10
.1021/ja0017108.
12 Loo, J.A., Holsworth, D.D., and Root-Bernstein, R.S. (1994). Use of electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry to probe antisense peptide interactions. Biol.
Mass. Spectrom. 23 (1): 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/bms.1200230103.
13 Hofstadler, S.A., Sannes-Lowery, K.A., Crooke, S.T. et al. (1999). Multiplexed
screening of neutral mass-tagged RNA targets against ligand libraries with
electrospray ionization FTICR MS: a paradigm for high- throughput anity
screening. Anal. Chem. 71 (16): 3436–3440. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990262n.
14 Seth, P.P. , Miyaji, A., Jeerson, E.A. et al. (2005). SAR by MS: discovery of a
new class of RNA-binding small molecules for the hepatitis C virus: internal
ribosome entry site IIA subdomain. J. Med. Chem. 48 (23): 7099–7102. https://
doi.org/10.1021/jm050815o.
15 Sannes-Lowery, K.A., Griey, R.H., and Hofstadler, S.A. (2000). Measuring
dissociation constants of RNA and aminoglycoside antibiotics by electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 280 (2): 264–271. https://doi.org/
10.1006/abio.2000.4550.
16 Annis, D.A., Athanasopoulos, J., Curran, P.J. et al. (2004). An anity
selection-mass spectrometry method for the identication of small molecule
ligands from self-encoded combinatorial libraries: discovery of a novel antagonist of E. coli dihydrofolate reductase. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 238 (2): 77–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2003.11.022.
17 Rizvi, N.F., Howe, J.A., Nahvi, A. et al. (2018). Discovery of selective
RNA-binding small molecules by anity-selection mass spectrometry. ACS
Chem. Biol. 13 (3): 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b01013.
18 O’Connell, T.N., Ramsay, J., Rieth, S.F. et al. (2014). Solution-based indirect
anity selection mass spectrometry-A general tool for high-throughput screening of pharmaceutical compound libraries. Anal. Chem. 86 (15): 7413–7420.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac500938y.
19 Annis, D.A., Nazef, N., Chuang, C.C. et al. (2004). A general technique to rank
protein-ligand binding anities and determine allosteric versus direct binding
site competition in compound mixtures. JACS 126 (47): 15495–15503. https://
doi.org/10.1021/ja048365x.
20 Brenner, S. and Lerner, R.A. (1992). Encoded combinatorial chemistry (chemical
repertoire/encoded libraries/commaless code) 89: https://www.pnas.org.
21 Litovchick, A., Tian, X., Monteiro, M.I. et al. (2019). Novel nucleic acid binding
small molecules discovered using DNA-encoded chemistry. Molecules 24 (10):
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24102026.Previous example of DEL to nd
ligands of DNA quartets:
References 83
https://t.me/med1917
22 Petersen, L.K., Blakskjær, P., Chaikuad, A. et al. (2016). Novel p38α MAP
kinase inhibitors identied from yoctoReactor DNA-encoded small molecule
library. MedChemComm 7 (7): 1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MD00241B.
23 Mukherjee, H., Blain, J.C., Vandivier, L.E. et al. (2020). PEARL-seq: a pho-
toanity platform for the analysis of small molecule-RNA interactions. ACS
Chem. Biol. 15 (9): 2374–2381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.0c00357.
24 Chen, Q., Li, Y., Lin, C. et al. (2022). Expanding the DNA-encoded library tool-
box: identifying small molecules targeting RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (12): E67.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac173.
25 Benhamou, R.I., Suresh, B.M., Tong, Y. et al. (2022). DNA-encoded library ver-
sus RNA-encoded library selection enables design of an oncogenic noncoding
RNA inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119 (6): https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas
.2114971119.
26 MacConnell, A.B., McEnaney, P.J., Cavett, V.J., and Paegel, B.M. (2015).
DNA-encoded solid-phase synthesis: encoding language design and complex
oligomer library synthesis. ACS Comb. Sci. 17 (9): 518–534. https://doi.org/10
.1021/acscombsci.5b00106.
27 Gibaut, Q.M.R., Akahori, Y., Bush, J.A. et al. (2022). Study of an RNA-focused
DNA-encoded library informs design of a degrader of a r(CUG) repeat expansion. JACS https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c08883.
28 Connelly, C.M., Abulwerdi, F.A., and Schneekloth, J.S. (2017). Discovery of
RNA binding small molecules using small molecule microarrays. In: Methods
in Molecular Biology, vol. 1518, 157–175. Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10
.1007/978-1-4939-6584-7_11 .
29 Velagapudi, S.P., Costales, M.G., Vummidi, B.R. et al. (2018). Approved
anti-cancer drugs target oncogenic non-coding RNAs. Cell Chem. Biol. 25 (9):
1086–1094.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.05.015.
30 Disney, M.D. and Seeberger, P.H. (2004). Aminoglycoside microarrays to explore
interactions of antibiotics 14th RNAs and proteins. Chem. A Eur. J. 10 (13):
3308–3314. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200306017.
31 Sztuba-Solinska, J., Shenoy, S.R., Gareiss, P. et al. (2014). Identication of bio-
logically active, HIV TAR RNA-binding small molecules using small molecule
microarrays. JACS 136 (23): 8402–8410. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja502754f.
32 Connelly, C.M., Boer, R.E., Moon, M.H. et al. (2017). Discovery of inhibitors of
MicroRNA-21 processing using small molecule microarrays. ACS Chem. Biol. 12
(2): 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6b00945.
33 Connelly, C.M., Numata, T., Boer, R.E. et al. (2019). Synthetic ligands for PreQ
1 riboswitches provide structural and mechanistic insights into targeting RNA
tertiary structure. Nat. Commun. 10 (1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-01909493-3.
34 Abulwerdi, F.A., Xu, W. , Ageeli, A.A. et al. (2019). Selective small-molecule
targeting of a triple helix encoded by the long noncoding RNA, MALAT1. ACS
Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b00807.
84 4 Screening and Lead Generation Techniques for RNA Binders
https://t.me/med1917
35 Tran, B., Pichling, P., Tenney, L. et al. (2020). Parallel discovery strategies pro-
vide a basis for riboswitch ligand design. Cell Chem. Biol. 27 (10): 1241–1249.e4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.07.021.
36 Suresh, B. M., Akahori, Y., Taghavi, A., Crynen, G., Gibaut, Q. M. R., Li, Y.,
& Disney, M. D. (2022). Low-molecular weight small molecules can potently
bind RNA and aect oncogenic pathways in cells. JACS, 144(45), 20815–20824.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c08770.
37 Ertl, P. (2003). Cheminformatics analysis of organic substituents: identication
of the most common substituents, calculation of substituent properties, and
automatic identication of drug-like bioisosteric groups. ChemInform 34 (21):
https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200321198.
38 Bohacek, R. S., McMartin, C., & Guida, W. C. (1996). The art and practice of
structure-based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective. In Medicinal
Research Reviews (Vol. 16, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128
(199601)16:1<3::AID-MED1>3.0.CO;2-6.
39 Fink, T. and Raymond, J.L. (2007). Virtual exploration of the chemical uni-
verse up to 11 atoms of C, N, O, F: Assembly of 26.4 million structures (110.9
million stereoisomers) and analysis for new ring systems, stereochemistry,
physicochemical properties, compound classes, and drug discovery. JCIM 47 (2):
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci600423u.
40 Cressina, E., Chen, L., Abell, C. et al. (2011). Fragment screening against the
thiamine pyrophosphate riboswitch thiM. Chem. Sci. 2 (1): https://doi.org/10
.1039/c0sc00406e.
41 Warner, K.D., Homan, P., Weeks, K.M. et al. (2014). Validating fragment-based
drug discovery for biological RNAs: lead fragments bind and remodel the TPP
riboswitch specically. Chem. Biol. 21 (5): 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/J
.CHEMBIOL.2014.03.007.
42 Garavís, M., López-Méndez, B., Somoza, A. et al. (2014). Discovery of selective
ligands for telomeric RNA G-quadruplexes (TERRA) through 19F-NMR based
fragment screening. ACS Chem. Biol. 9 (7): https://doi.org/10.1021/cb500100z.
43 Zeiger, M., Stark, S., Kalden, E. et al. (2014). Fragment based search for small
molecule inhibitors of HIV-1 Tat-TAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24 (24): https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.11.004.
44 Lee, M.K., Bottini, A., Kim, M. et al. (2014). A novel small-molecule binds
to the inuenza A virus RNA promoter and inhibits viral replication. Chem.
Commun. 50 (3): https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc46973e.
45 Congreve, M., Carr, R., Murray, C., and Jhoti, H. (2003). A “Rule of Three” for
fragment-based lead discovery? Drug Discovery Today 8 (19): https://doi.org/10
.1016/S1359-6446(03)02831-9.
46 Cox, O.B., Krojer, T., Collins, P. et al. (2016). A poised fragment library enables
rapid synthetic expansion yielding the rst reported inhibitors of PHIP(2), an
atypical bromodomain. Chem. Sci. 7 (3): https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc03115j.
47 Morgan, B.S., Sanaba, B.G., Donlic, A. et al. (2019). R-BIND: an interactive
database for exploring and developing RNA-targeted chemical probes. ACS
Chem. Biol. 14 (12): https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.9b00631.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана