Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5639_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
168
https://t.me/med1917
A. Mukherjee et al.
9.4.1 Gene Transfer-Based Transgenesis
The process of drug discovery often begins with the identication and isolation of specic genes that encode proteins with potential therapeutic applications. Once a gene is isolated, researchers can perform invitro transcription to generate mRNA and, in turn, translate this mRNA into a cell-free system to produce a small amount of the corresponding protein (Spreaco etal. 2020). While this approach is useful for certain biochemical studies, it has limitations when it comes to examining the protein’s biological activity invivo or guring out its three-dimensional structure through techniques such as crystallization (Agu etal. 2023).
To effectively decode the gene and translate it into a functional protein, the gene needs to be inserted into the cells. Cells naturally possess the necessary machinery for transcription and translation. However, the plasma membranes of several cell kinds serve as a selective barrier, controlling the uptake of compounds. Some mol­ecules can enter cells through pores, which may be controlled in an open or closed manner (Zhang etal. 2019). Alternatively, specic carriers facilitate the transport of molecules into the cell. In some cases, molecules recognize external receptors of the plasma membrane, forming complexes that trigger endocytosis (Fig.9.1). This pro­cess involves the absorption of the intricate and surrounding membrane (Houdebine 2003).
DNA, being a large, negatively charged molecule, is not able to pass the plasma membrane on its own. This serves as a protective mechanism for cells against for­eign DNA (Houdebine 2003). However, to introduce DNA into cells for various studies, techniques collectively known as transfection are employed. Transfection
Fig. 9.1 Gene transfer to embryonic stem cells by microinjection technique
9 Transgenesis: In the Drug Discovery Process, Including Target Identication…
https://t.me/med1917
169
involves different methods to force DNA entry into cells and reach their nucleus. It is important to note that transfection differs from cell infection (Houdebine 2003), which is a process involving various mechanisms employed by viruses to deliver their genomes into host cells. These insights into cellular processes and gene trans­fer techniques are crucial in the drug discovery process, allowing researchers to study and manipulate genes for therapeutic purposes.
Several physiochemical phenomena facilitate gene transfer into cells, including cell fusion, transfection, DNA microinjection, viral vectors, electroporation, and vectors with particular ligands. Each method has its unique advantages and applica­tions in the context of drug discovery.
9.4.2 Vector-Based Transgenesis
In vivo gene transfer inserts a gene via a vector into an organism, allowing research­ers to investigate biological functions. However, the ultimate goal is gene therapy, which involves delivering genetic information to target cells to replace defective functions or introduce additional functions. Ex vivo gene therapy involves extract­ing target cells, inserting desired genes, and returning them to the patient, but has limited results.
In vivo gene therapy faces challenges due to the lack of an efcient, non-toxic gene delivery system (Fig.9.2). Viruses can be used to transduce cells by replacing non-essential viral genes with therapeutic genes. Despite triggering a host immune response, viruses have evolved countermeasures to enter and multiply within the intended cells. In 1973, the rst attempt was made to employ viruses as medicinal agents, but replication-competent viruses remain a research eld (Bouard etal. 2009).
Fig. 9.2 Vector-based transgenesis
170
https://t.me/med1917
A. Mukherjee et al.
9.5 Transgenesis: Target Identication
A transgene is a gene that has been spontaneously transmitted from one creature to another or has been created by one of several genetic engineering methods. A pro­cedure called transgenesis, which involves the insertion of a transgene, can alter an organism’s phenotype. A transgene is a section of DNA that has been extracted from one organism and inserted into another, carrying a gene sequence. This non-native DNA segment may change the transgenic organism’s genetic code from functioning normally, or it may preserve the transgenic organism’s capacity to create RNA or protein. Usually, the DNA is integrated into the germ line of the organism (Gordon and Ruddle 1981). Gene therapy and transgenesis share the similarity of transform­ing cells for a certain objective, but their goals are very different: Gene therapy aims to x a disease in cells, while transgenesis seeks to generate a genetically trans­formed organism by inserting a specic transgene into each cell and changing its genome (Moody etal. 1981).
Mouse molecular genetics underwent a revolution in the 1980s. The rst trans­genic mouse was produced by injecting cloned DNA into fertilized mouse eggs (Gordon etal. 1980). Investigators quickly reported germline transfer of transgenes via nuclear injection of DNA (Costantini and Lacy 1981). Transgenic mice have now been employed in a frenzy of research that has not stopped examining a variety of topics, such as tissue-specic gene expression, oncogenesis, and developmental alterations (Neidhardt etal. 2000).
9.5.1 Transgenic Target Identication
There are several methods for nding novel possible pharmacological targets (Debouck and Goodfellow 1999). The genetic approach and the genomic approach are two conceptually distinct methods (Schmid etal. 2021). The genetic method examines the differences in mRNA expression between, say, healthy and diseased tissues or the alterations in gene expression that occur when a substance is intro­duced to a cell culture medium or administered to an animal (Alberts 2017). These days, a lot of organizations employ proteomics and microarray technologies to nd variations in gene expression (Lockhart and Winzeler 2000).
9.5.2 Meaning oftheTarget Identication
The process of gathering data for and against a target is known as target identica­tion and validation. To gather enough information, medication developers usually spend 12–18months (about 1 and a half years) either performing original research
9 Transgenesis: In the Drug Discovery Process, Including Target Identication…
https://t.me/med1917
or replicating existing studies in the literature (Békés etal. 2022). In the absence of a small-molecule tool, genetically modied animals, neutralizing antibodies, and small-interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) can be used as research tools for valida­tion; nevertheless, their capacity to understand the pharmacodynamics of the drug­target interaction is often restricted. (MacDonald etal. 1993).
171
9.5.3 Difference andImportance Between Target
andIndicators
There are two primary reasons why drugs fail in clinical settings: they are unsafe or they do not function. Therefore, target selection and validation are among the most crucial phases in the development of a novel medication. A target is a general phrase that may be used to describe a variety of biological things, such as proteins, genes, and RNA.A good target must be “druggable,” safe, suit clinical and com­mercial goals, and be effective. Whether a tiny molecule or a bigger biological one, a “druggable” target is reachable by the possible therapeutic chemical and, upon binding, causes a biological response that can be evaluated both invitro and in vivo. It is now established that while antibodies are effective in obstructing protein/protein interactions, other target classes—such as GPCRs, which are con­nected to proteins—are more amenable to the development of small-molecule drugs. A well-dened and validated objective allows for more trust in the connec­tion between the target and the illness and enables us to investigate whether chang­ing the target will have side effects based on a mechanism (Henning and Beste 2002).
9.5.4 Aim ofTransgenic Target Identication
While homologous integrations do happen and transfer DNA to a specic site in the genome, random integrations of imported DNA predominate. The early cases of gene targeting required stringent screening for the rare homologous occur­rences, which occurred at around 10−3–10−5 of total integrations, regardless of whether the locus was “natural” or articially produced (Smithies etal. 1985; Lin etal. 1985). Since then, several ES cell examples have typically produced targeted frequencies of 10−2 or greater for the overall number of integrations. The percent­age of targeted clones among selected clones can be increased by including enrich­ment techniques in the selection process (Mansour etal. 1988). Drug selection is crucial for isolating targeted clones since a targeting frequency of 10−2 of total integers corresponds to a 10−5–10−6 absolute targeting frequency of the transfected cell population.
172
https://t.me/med1917
A. Mukherjee et al.
9.5.5 Properties ofGood Gene Target
Still, it can be difcult to predict how transgenes, especially targeted ones, would express themselves. Targeting the lacZ reporter gene to the third exon of hprt was noteworthy because the targeted clones exhibited varied expressions that depended on both orientation and cell type (Shaw-white etal. 1993; Maltsev etal. 1994). Like lacZ targeted to the hprt locus, in this instance, ES clones also showed variable β-galactosidase staining patterns. In both scenarios for the variegated staining pat­terns, promoter occlusion effects may be accountable because it has been shown that nearby promoters might affect one another (Alam and Cook 1990; Barnes etal.
2000). It might be possible to prevent promoter occlusion effects with such a design.
It is challenging to come to a denitive judgment in this regard, nevertheless, because Northern analysis was used to monitor the expression of bcl-2 rather than expression within individual cells.
9.5.6 Method andTypes ofTarget Identication
Target validation is an ongoing, crucial procedure that begins at the beginning of the discovery phase. Various steps of this procedure need the application of different validation techniques. Cultured cells and bioinformatics technologies can be uti­lized in the very early stages when choices must be made among several targets. Before signicant resources are committed to the possible target, there is an urgent need for invivo TV data. Although a lot of work is being done to nd quick, depend­able, and universal methods for invivo validation, transgenic animals are the only ones that have proven effective so far on a variety of targets. A target and possible medication combination cannot be considered fully “validated” until the novel med­icine has been evaluated in clinical trials. The creation of genetically altered animals that either overexpress (gene addition) or lack the target (knockout animals) is a typical necessity in the TV phase. These animals offer functional invivo data— which are frequently lacking—on a possible target. These days, varying degrees of complexity can be used to modify the target gene’s expression in genetically engi­neered animals. One that overexpresses the transgene either broadly or selectively in a particular tissue is the fastest-growing transgenic animal. Nowadays, a wide variety of tissue-specic promoters have been used to restrict transgene expression in different cell types. (Morimoto et al. 2001; Burton et al. 1991; Field 1988). Several mechanisms exist for controlling transgenic expression using non­physiological inducers. The phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase promoter and the metallothionein promoter were the rst inducible systems employed in transgenic animals. There were issues with background expression levels, and these systems were hard to control. With several successful trials under its belt, the tetracycline system is currently the most popular method for regulating transgenes. Although technologies for articial dimerization of molecules and the ecdysone system have
9 Transgenesis: In the Drug Discovery Process, Including Target Identication…
https://t.me/med1917
also been created, it is yet unclear how broadly these systems may be used to regu­late transgenes. Furthermore, gene activity has been regulated via fusion proteins that link an effector protein (such as Cre) to a steroid receptor’s ligand-binding domain (Lim etal. 1990; Ewald etal. 1996; Furth etal. 1994; Perea etal. 2001; No etal. 1996; Amara etal. 1997).
173
9.5.7 Steps ofTransgenic Target Identication
DNA Preparation andPurication
DNA Construct/Fragment Structure
DNA microinjection appeared to be one of the only gene transfer techniques where fragment size was unaffected when compared to other techniques (especially when it came to retro-viral packaging); however, the initial limitations on fragment size were imposed by the cloning vectors cosmid (45kb) and plasmid (12kb). Large chromosomal segments and vectors such as the yeast articial chromosome (YAC), P1, and bacterial articial chromosome (BAC) can now be cloned in addition to bigger stable constructions.
Preparation ofDNA forMicroinjection
(a) Purication of DNA
• After verifying correct cloning and conrming the nucleotide sequence, the DNA fragment undergoes purication steps.
• The goal is to ensure that the DNA fragment is free of nicks or strand breaks and is as pure as possible.
(b) Use of High-Quality Reagents
• High-quality reagents are emphasized for the nal purication steps.
• Solutions are made from tissue culture-grade, 18MW water.
(c) Water Purication Systems
• Commercial water systems are utilized, combining reverse osmosis and dis­tillation combined with ultraltration or deionization.
• Water systems from various manufacturers, such as Millipore’s Milli-Q, Barnstead’s NanoPure, and Corning’s Mega-Pure, are mentioned.
(d) Filtration of Solutions
• Solutions are processed using a 0.45- or 0.2-mm lter after preparation.
• Host Strain for Plasmid Replication
174
https://t.me/med1917
A. Mukherjee et al.
• It is possible to reproduce plasmid DNA in any common Escherichia coli host.
• CPLK-17, the DH5 methylase-defective strain, is recommended for maintain­ing the methylation state of the gene construct during cloning.
(e) Transgene Rescue and Analysis
• The CPLK-17 strain allows transgene rescue for toxicology applications and the analysis of anking regions of the chromosomal insertion.
• This facilitates the localization of insertional mutants.
(f) Cloning and Gene Construct Assembly
• Techniques for basic cloning and gene construct assembly are referenced.
• Large-scale DNA preparation is mentioned, with references to well­documented methods.
(g) Linearization and Microinjection Preparation
• Before microinjection, the plasmid DNA is puried by isolating supercoiled DNA from a cesium chloride (CsCl) gradient.
• Using restriction enzyme digestion, the gene fragment is then separated from the vector sequences.
(h) Minimization of Flanking Vector Sequences
• The passage highlights the routine minimization of the amount of anking vector sequences for injection fragments.
• Vector DNA sequences can inuence the function of foreign genes after chromosomal integration.
(i) Construct Design
• The construct should be designed to facilitate easy separation of DNA bands migrated on agarose gels.
Superovulation, Egg Culture, andHarvest
(a) Popular Mouse Hybrid for DNA Microinjection
• Several hybrids are commonly used for DNA microinjection.
• The C57BL/6 SJL (B6SJL) F1 hybrid is specically mentioned as being efcient in generating transgenic mice.
• References are made to studies supporting the efciency of this hybrid.
(a) Preference for C57BL/6 Inbred Strain in Parental Stocks
• The C57BL/6 inbred strain is one of the parental stocks in most hybrids used for microinjection.
• This choice is based on favorable genetic and embryological characteristics associated with the C57BL/6 strain.
9 Transgenesis: In the Drug Discovery Process, Including Target Identication…
https://t.me/med1917
(b) Advantages of Hybrid Mice
• One of the main benets of employing hybrid mice for microinjection is their accentuated hybrid vigor.
• Hybrid vigor not only imparts desirable reproductive characteristics but also enhances egg quality, leading to favorable microinjection characteristics.
(c) Considerations for Genetic Background Uniformity
• There is a cautionary note about the need to be concerned with the unifor­mity of the genetic background in which the transgene will be functioning.
• This consideration is particularly important for experimental designs requir­ing large populations or many generations of transgenic mice.
Microinjection Needles andSlides
(a) Slide Option
• Cut-out or depression slides can hold eggs and DNA.For cut-out slides, an equivalent area is removed from a at glass slide instead of creating a depres­sion in the center.
(b) Cut-Out Slides and Disposable Coverslips
175
• Cut-out slides use disposable glass coverslips for holding microdrops over­laid with oil.
• The coverslips are attached to the bottom of the cut-out slide using a ring of parafn, positioned outside the periphery of the hole.
(c) Advantages of Cut-Out Slides
• Cut-out slides offer advantages over depression slides.
• Coverslips are disposable.
• There is less light refraction.
(d) Conguration Details
• To prevent the cover slip from contacting surfaces, on the bottom of the slide at both ends, 1–2mm blocks or risers are employed.
(e) Needle Manipulation Considerations
• Due to the conguration of cut-out slides and the need for a greater needle angle when working with dishes on a microscope, needle tips must be bent at approximately a 30° angle prior to microinjection.
A HEPES-buffered medium is utilized for microinjection; examples include modied BMOC-3 plus HEPES (recipes in Table9.1) supplemented with cytocha­lasin B (5mg/mL). The egg will probably lyse quickly if the injection causes the egg membrane to be pulled into the cytoplasm. During microinjection, cytochalasin B stiffens the membranes and aids in preventing egg lysis. Conversely, 7% (v/v)
176
https://t.me/med1917
ethanol produces a comparable result (P. Hoppe, private correspondence 1991). Another method for stiffening egg membranes is to utilize a stage cooler (e.g., KT Model 5000, Technology, Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) to reduce the slide tempera­ture to 10°C.As long as the eggs are returned to 37.5°C within 45min, neither the proportion of transgenic mice produced nor egg survival will be affected by this.
Microinjection Equipment
It is frequently employed, and a choice must be considered before making one. The brand or design of the microscope may have an impact on the nal differential inter­ference contrast (DIC) magnication, and prior training or personal experiences often determine the ideal eld diameter. DIC is often only needed at 200¥ microin­jection magnication. Although it offers a sizable working eld for sorting eggs and priming pipettes, low-power magnication does not need DIC optics. It is thus rec­ommended to test the nal setup and any required changes (such as light lament, lens, diaphragms, and focusing lenses) prior to purchase, ideally when the manufac­turer’s representative and a small number of eggs are accessible at the same time. The representative may congure the DIC in a way that is deemed “optimal,” but this does not guarantee the nest pronuclear pictures (Rusconi 1991, 1996).
A. Mukherjee et al.
9.5.8 Problem inTransgenic Target Identication
Since cloning has made it easier to add and replace genes, animal transgenesis has a signicant inuence on human health. Agricultural animal species’ whole­genome sequencing provides more genes for study and helps create advantageous animal lines. Although transgenic animals are useful for researching human ill­nesses and creating therapeutic proteins, moral dilemmas still exist. The use of transgenesis to improve animal production presents difculties in assessing the potential medical effects. Although gene transfer is progressing, barriers such as high costs for transgenic farm founders and delayed trait transmission remain, meaning transgenes must provide signicant benets before they can be used in practice (Houdebine 2005).
9.6 Transgenesis: Target Validation
9.6.1 Validation Method
That is, by comparing computations with a collection of experimental data, we may determine how condent we are in a code’s capacity to anticipate results for a par­ticular application (Trucano et al. 2006). Within the context of studies on the
9 Transgenesis: In the Drug Discovery Process, Including Target Identication…
https://t.me/med1917
validity of aptitude tests for people evaluation, the notion of situational specicity has taken on rather varied roles. The validity coefcients were shown to differ greatly when standardized aptitude tests were rst associated with performance on seemingly identical occupations in industrial validation studies (Anastasi 1986).
177
9.6.2 Target Validation Method
Like target identication, target validation veries that the interaction of the target has the potential to be therapeutically benecial. A target will not be developed further in the drug development process if it cannot be veried. Samuel Gandy, professor in the departments of neurology and psychiatry and associate director of the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center at Mount Sinai, and Reisa Sperling, pro­fessor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the Center for Alzheimer’s Research and Treatment, talked about two opportunities: early valida­tion of targets and improved biomarkers. Eli Lilly and Company’s Chief Scientic Ofcer for Tailored Therapeutics-Neuroscience, Kalpana Merchant, furthermore, provided a portfolio evaluation tool that outlined certain parameters for target vali­dation and qualication. The crucial rst phase in the development of a new medica­tion is target validation, which normally takes two to six months to nish. In order to prove that the drug’s actions on the target can provide therapeutic advantages within an acceptable safety window, a variety of procedures must be applied. The likelihood of success in clinical trials is greatly increased when early and thorough target validation is implemented, as it helps to establish a clear correlation between target alteration and disease effectiveness. A target moves on to the hit identication phase of the research after it reaches a satisfactory degree of validation and illness correlation.
9.6.3 Animal Model Validity
A scientic technique to increase a model’s credibility is to validate it or assess its consistency and plausibility. Validity refers to the extent to which a test’s score or measure aligns with the attribute it is intended to evaluate. It is the interpretation of the data derived from this model that is validated, not the animal model. In that regard, validity is a crucial factor to consider when assessing animal models. There is not one animal model that works for everything or in every circumstance. Because validity is limited to a particular application of the model, it must constantly be available for debate and revision (Kaplan and Saccuzzo 2001; Silva 1993). Regarding the relative importance of the various validity criteria in the model review process, there is no universal agreement. We maintain that a model’s construct validity, external validity (i.e., gen- realizability), predictive validity, and reliability and replicability (internal validity) should all be taken into account throughout the