Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5639_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
6 Production ofBiopharmaceuticals onGenetically Modied Organisms
https://t.me/med1917
emerged as an expression system for antibiotics production. To produce G-CSF, the human g-csf gene was cloned into a periplasmic expression vector. The created plasmids were then inserted into the P. uorescens chassis strain, which has a spe- cic phenotype for soluble expression of G-CSF (Wang etal. 2020).
Recombinant Bacillus brevis was used to secrete about 100 mg L-1 of a Fab against human urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Besides Bacillus brevis, Bacillus choshinensis, and B. megaterium were employed to produce antibody frag­ments with high binding afnity to antigens, which also come under the category of biopharmaceuticals. Growth factors like the human epithelial growth factor (hEGF), used to treat diseases like cancer, are produced from recombinant Bacillus brevis HPD31 and B. subtilis. Interferon alpha, beta, and gamma are produced by several recombinant B. subtilis strains cultured on a complex medium (Lakowitz etal. 2018).
95
6.4 Role ofFungi inBiopharmaceuticals
With the rst successful report (1978) on the modication of Saccharomyces cere­visiae by plasmid DNA, the age of genetic engineering in yeasts was launched. It is
used in the production of vaccinations against the human papillomavirus (HPV) and human serum albumin, as well as therapeutic proteins, peptides, and antibodies. The hepatitis B vaccine being one of the recombinant vaccines had been produced from the S. cerevisiae (yeast) unlike the production process of conventional vaccines which was time consuming and had the risk of pathogenicity (Kulagina etal. 2021). Also, subunit vaccines and virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines prefer using yeast as the heterologous expression system in their process of production. β-D- glucose polysaccharides, or β-glucans, are present in the cell walls of yeasts, and their immunomodulatory and adjuvant properties make them ideal for use in WYB vaccines. The β-glucans have an afnity to bind to specic receptors of immune cells like the dectin-1 receptor, the complement receptor 3 (CR3), and toll-like­receptors (TLRs). This property of binding to these specic receptors renders β-glucans as anticancer agents. Cytotoxic T cell responses against tumours and enhancement of haemopoiesis also proved β-glucans as anticancer agent in clinical trials. Human pathogen contamination poses a risk to the labour-intensive, expen­sive, and time-consuming process of purifying therapeutic human proteins from blood or tissue extracts and due to the manufacture of human therapeutic proteins in genetically modied yeast, bacteria, and also cultured mammalian cells, a variety of recombinant therapeutic proteins are now available for patients, resolving these concerns. All manufacturing methods, meanwhile, have their limitations. Yeast and bacteria, for example, are unable to synthesis complex human proteins including genuine post-translational modications. Although only “simple” proteins are cur­rently produced in yeast and bacteria, efforts are underway to humanise these non­mammal systems (Roohvand etal. 2017).
Pichia pastoris (Komagataella species) is yeast that uses methanol as a carbon source. It is the rst known methylotrophic yeast that may be used to produce het­erologous proteins utilising the methanol-inducible, endogenous AOX1 promoter.
96
https://t.me/med1917
Also, this species possess comparatively lesser degree of hypermannosylation so there will be lesser problems of post-translational modications in their products. These features make it to be a well-enough option to be genetically manipulated in order to use it as a host to produce biopharmaceuticals (Ahmad etal. 2014). P. pas- toris was found to secrete biologically active human growth hormone (HGH) ef­ciently, according to a patent application. In addition to HGH, P. pastoris is also used in producing human calcitonin (hCT) and human alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), peptide hormones that control blood levels of calcium and phosphate. AFP, or alpha foetal protein, is a plasma protein that is produced by the liver during foetal devel­opment and is used as a tumour marker in cancer therapy.
Genetically modied Y. lipolytica strains have found their application in biophar- maceuticals production, specically in enzyme replacement therapy, and AzurRx Biopharma, Inc. (Brooklyn, NY, USA/Langlade, France), INRA and also Mayoly Spindler (Chatou, France) together developed lipase enzyme from these strains which were found to overexpress LIP2. Pancreatic insufciency has been treated with the help of this recombinant lipase enzyme. OXY2810, a recombinant human acid α-glucosidase produced from Y. lipolytica, is used to treat glycogen build up, that is, Pompe disease. A GCase decorated with M6P glycans is being developed to treat neuronopathic Gaucher disease, which is caused by glucocerebroside buildup in neuronal cells. Recombinant glucocerebrosidase (GCase) is undergoing preclini­cal testing for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (Madzak 2021).
S. Jana et al.
6.5 Transgenic Animals asRecombination Protein
Expression Medium
Transgenic animals prove to be quite a good platform for biopharmaceutical pro­duction due to the following factors: economically viable, appreciable productivity of synthesized proteins, and quality of products. Animal bioreactors can create recombinant proteins that are structurally close to their original forms owing to the evolutionary link that exists between humans and different mammal species. Numerous animal species, such as mice, cattle, pigs, goats, sheep, and rabbits, have been employed as bioreactors (Bertolini et al. 2016). The expression method of complex recombinant proteins in milk is thought to be the best option currently available for the production of biopharmaceuticals when it comes to animal plat­forms. The production of a targeted protein in milk can be directed towards the mammary gland by using specic promoters for the gland, such as αs1-casein and whey acid protein (WAP). The technologies related to the purication of recombi­nant proteins produced from milk have dramatically advanced, enabling the com­pletion of several specialised studies for the synthesis of biopharmaceuticals in transgenic animal milk (Chaible etal. 2010). The mammary gland’s expression sys­tem is the sole animal platform that can produce recombinant proteins for approved commerce for therapeutic use.
For example, in 2006 the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the mar­keting of the rst recombinant antithrombin drug, Atryn, produced from transgenic
6 Production ofBiopharmaceuticals onGenetically Modied Organisms
https://t.me/med1917
97
animals in European Union countries. Goats and rabbits collaborated to approve Ruconest~ (Pharming) which is a recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor protein (C1INH), another biopharmaceutical derived from milk which was approved by European Medicines Agency in 2012 and FDA in 2014 (Bertolini etal. 2016). The animal platform has been proven to be a very reliable method for producing bio­pharmaceuticals through testing, approval, and growing convergence.
The production of biopharmaceuticals through animal transgenesis is still being developed. While signicant progress has been made, convincing advancements must be made to guarantee efciency in lowering transgenesis costs and allow the process to be implemented on an industrial scale. Additional advancements in the eld are provided by novel molecular genetic techniques in conjunction with recent developments in genome annotation and sequencing, invitro embryo creation, and reproductive technologies like nuclear transfer. Transgenic animals have a number of advantages over cultured cells, chief among them being the simplicity with which a huge number of useful proteins may be created and extracted. This is a result of both the biology of the producing cell and the “low tech” character of the fundamental production method, which uses animals in the eld rather than intricate fermentation containers (Shakweer etal. 2023).
Important sources of production of biopharmaceuticals
Sources Description Reference
Milk • The expression method of complex recombinant proteins in
milk is thought to be the nest option currently available for the production of biopharmaceuticals when it comes to animal platforms
• The mammary gland shows great potential to synthesize proteins and other biochemicals for baby nourishment during lactation. Milk contains a complex and wealthy combination of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. The primary milk protein is casein, which comes in ve different forms in mice, four in sheep and also cows, and two in humans. The milk of transgenic animals can express a vast array of foreign proteins
• Human α-antitrypsin has been successfully expressed in sheep to levels of up to 35g/L using the ovine BLG promoter. Complex multi-chain proteins like brinogen and transgene combinations intended to enhance the lactating mammary glands innate capacity for protein processing are examples of the work that has been done in this area
• In 2006, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the marketing of the rst recombinant antithrombin drug produced from goat milk, Atryn, in the European Union countries. Recombinant proteins such as human IGF-1, hGH, human lysozyme, human lactoferrin, human parathyroid hormone, and anti-clotting factors such as protein C, Antithrombin III, factor VII, factor VIII, factor IX, brinogen, and tissue plasminogen activator have also been successfully expressed in transgenic animals
Niemann etal. (2012), Bertolini etal. (2016)
98
https://t.me/med1917
Sources Description Reference
Urine • The urinary system has some advantages over the mammary
gland when it comes to producing certain proteins. Urine is formed by animals well before the recombinant protein and lactation can mature more effectively. Membrane-associated proteins called uroplakins are only expressed in the evolved uroepithelium of the bladder and urethra
• Scientists have successfully directed human granulocyte macrophage- colony stimulating factor (hG-CSF) and human growth hormone (hGH) to express in mice using the mouse uroplakin II gene promoter. However, a major challenge with this process of production is the lower capacity for synthesis in the kidney and bladder compared to the mammary gland
Blood • Transgenic animal blood is a growing source of human
polyclonal antibodies due to the development of recombinant human proteins. Improved immune systems in cattle, pigs, and also rabbits are being developed
• These animals can be vaccinated with a broad range of antigens to produce a plentiful supply of human polyclonal antibodies. These antibodies have signicant advantages over monoclonal antibodies and can be useful in passive immunotherapy. It is possible to express proteins using animal blood as a bodily uid
• Examples of recombinant proteins produced in the blood of transgenic animals include human a1-antitrypsin in the serum of transgenic rabbits and transchromosomic cattle producing human polyclonal antibodies
Seminal uid
• Semen is a bodily uid produced by male sex glands in signicant amounts (200–300mL each time)
• Studies suggest that porcine seminal uid is a rich source of bioactive proteins. This is because the protein secretion process is exocrine, meaning it doesn’t harm the animal’s health
• Seminal plasma can be a great source for producing bioactive proteins due to its high capacity for protein processing, stability, and purication
Niemann etal. (2012), Bertolini etal. (2016)
Niemann etal. (2012), Bertolini etal. (2016)
Bertolini etal. (2016)
S. Jana et al.
6.6 Transgenes inProduction ofGenetically Modied Organisms
Pronuclear microinjection-introduced transgenes are intended to operate upon insertion into various locations within the host DNA.The number of copies of the transgenic, the place of insertion into the host genome, and the regulatory ele­ments—that is, the sequences that control transcription, RNA processing, and trans­lation—all affect how the transgene expresses itself. Before a desired gene can be successfully cloned and put into the organism, it must go through a number of changes. To enable gene expression, a promoter sequence is inserted. The
6 Production ofBiopharmaceuticals onGenetically Modied Organisms
https://t.me/med1917
transgenes must guide the profuse production and specic protein transport to the intended organ while preserving the health and welfare of the animal. They also need to gradually merge into the host genome and be transferred in a Mendelian fashion (Meyer 1995; Kaundal etal. 2014).
It could be required to modify codons to match those that are most commonly utilised by the host if the protein originates from progressively distant species. Additionally, if the protein is not normally released, the generating cell may be directed to secrete if a signal peptide is inserted at the N-terminus. A lot of genes are too big to t neatly into plasmid cloning vectors. A “minigene” comprising two or one introns and 3′ or 5′ anking regions believed to contain +ve regulatory elements is frequently created by combining cDNA and genomic sequences. Nevertheless, cryptic splice sites can occasionally result in abnormal RNA splicing when mixing and matching in this manner. The placement of the transgene within the host genome has a signicant role in its ability to be expressed. The closeness of activation sequences, silencers, promoters, and enhancers that are found naturally may also affect the transgenic expression pattern and intensity. Sometimes anking the trans­genic construct with insulator elements improves the level, consistency, and also specicity of transgene expression. Research has demonstrated that several types of insulators can keep surrounding natural enhancers and other regulatory components from inuencing transgenic promoters. They can also stop heterochromatin effects from extending into the transgene (Niemann etal. 2012).
99
6.7 Challenges Faced inProduction
DuetoPost- Translational Modications inSome Organisms
6.7.1 Glycosylation
One of the main obstacles to yeasts producing viable human therapeutic proteins is thought to be proper post-translational modication like glycosylation. The low number of authorised biopharmaceuticals from plant, insect, and yeast platforms is mostly due to unfavourable glycosylation. Biopharmaceuticals that need highly pre­cise and intricate N-glycans similar to those found in humans must therefore be created using mammalian expression platforms (Roohvand etal. 2017). Recombinant human (rh) glycoproteins differ from their endogenous counterparts due to glyco­sylation, which is species and cell-specic as well as culture-dependent which affects the accuracy of manufacturing methods. Proper glycosylation is also crucial for mAbs, the primary product class of biopharmaceuticals. The majority of mono­clonal antibodies (mAbs) belong to the IgG class and have a glycosylation site in the Fc region at amino acid position asparagine (Asn)–297; however a small fraction of mAbs have an additional site in the Fab region. Cell engineering focuses a lot of attention on the sugar moieties since they frequently directly affect
100
https://t.me/med1917
S. Jana et al.
pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity. The degree of sialylation and mannosylation can have an effect on the proper functioning of the mAb (Amann etal. 2019).
6.7.2 Carboxylation
Biopharmaceuticals requiring carboxylation must be expressed on platforms derived from multicellular species, ideally from mammalian hosts, as carboxylation activity is only documented inside multicellular organisms, such as mammals and Drosophila (Amann etal. 2019).
6.7.3 Tyrosine Sulfation
Appropriate tyrosine sulfation appears to affect biological activity and binding in addition to modulating protein stability and also biopharmaceuticals requiring sul­fotyrosine, like recombinant factor VIII (rhFVIII), are produced in mammalian cell systems because tyrosine sulfation cannot be carried out by E. coli or other prokary­otic expression platforms (Ezban etal. 2014).
6.8 Conclusion
Importance for biopharmaceuticals is rising due to increasing incidence of chronic diseases. Treatment for autoimmune diseases, genetic problems, and chronic ill­nesses like cancer has been transformed by biopharmaceuticals. Genetically modi­ed organisms, from microorganisms to transgenic mammals, are characterized to aid in the development of biopharmaceuticals. They are substantially rich in phar­macological and pharmacokinetic properties. Genetic engineering has proved to be a boon in the pharmaceutical eld. Despite few limitations in the production pro­cess, biopharmaceuticals are being successfully manufactured defying all odds. Therefore, more and more research should be carried out to contribute to one of the most pivotal industries in the healthcare arena.
References
Ahmad M, Hirz M, Pichler H, Schwab H (2014) Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: recent
achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
98:5301–5317 Alyas J, Raq A, Amir H, Khan SU, Sultana T, Ali A, Ahmad A (2021) Human insulin: history,
recent advances, and expression systems for mass production. Biomed Res Ther 8(9):4540–4561
6 Production ofBiopharmaceuticals onGenetically Modied Organisms
https://t.me/med1917
Amann T, Schmieder V, Faustrup Kildegaard H, Borth N, Andersen MR (2019) Genetic engineer-
ing approaches to improve posttranslational modication of biopharmaceuticals in different
production platforms. Biotechnol Bioeng 116(10):2778–2796 Bertolini LR, Meade H, Lazzarotto CR, Martins LT, Tavares KC, Bertolini M, Murray JD (2016)
The transgenic animal platform for biopharmaceutical production. Transgenic Res 25:329–343 Bhatia S, Goli D (2018) History, scope and development of biotechnology. In: Introduction to
pharmaceutical biotechnology, vol 1, pp1–61 Chaible LM, Corat MA, Abdelhay E, Dagli ML (2010) Genetically modied animals for use in
research and biotechnology. Genet Mol Res 9(3):1469–1482 Ezban M, Vad K, Kjalke M (2014) Turoctocog alfa (NovoEight®)–from design to clinical proof of
concept. Eur J Haematol 93(5):369–376 Gronemeyer P, Ditz R, Strube J (2014) Trends in upstream and downstream process development
for antibody manufacturing. Bioengineering 1(4):188–212 Jozala AF, Geraldes DC, Tundisi LL, Feitosa VDA, Breyer CA, Cardoso SL, Pessoa A Jr (2016)
Biopharmaceuticals from microorganisms: from production to purication. Braz J Microbiol
47:51–63 Kaundal R, Yang Y, Nottoli T, Chi T (2014) Towards the molecular mechanisms of transgenera-
tional epigenetic inheritance: insights from transgenic mice. In: Transgenerational epigenetics.
Academic Press, pp75–85 Kesik-Brodacka M (2018) Progress in biopharmaceutical development. Biotechnol Appl Biochem
65(3):306–322 Kulagina N, Besseau S, Godon C, Goldman GH, Papon N, Courdavault V (2021) Yeasts as bio-
pharmaceutical production platforms. Front Fungal Biol 2:733492 Lakowitz A, Godard T, Biedendieck R, Krull R (2018) Mini review: recombinant production of
tailored bio-pharmaceuticals in different bacillus strains and future perspectives. Eur J Pharm
Biopharm 126:27–39 Madzak C (2021) Yarrowia lipolytica strains and their biotechnological applications: how natural
biodiversity and metabolic engineering could contribute to cell factories improvement. J Fungi
7(7):548 Mehta A (2019) Downstream processing for biopharmaceuticals recovery. In: Pharmaceuticals
from microbes: the bioengineering perspective, pp163–190 Meyer P (1995) Understanding and controlling transgene expression. Trends Biotechnol
13(9):332–337 Niemann H, Kind A, Schnieke A (2012) Production of biopharmaceuticals in transgenic animals.
In: Pharmaceutical biotechnology: drug discovery and clinical applications, pp71–111 Pham JV, Yilma MA, Feliz A, Majid MT, Maffetone N, Walker JR, Yoon YJ (2019) A review of
the microbial production of bioactive natural products and biologics. Front Microbiol 10:1404 Roohvand F, Shokri M, Abdollahpour-Alitappeh M, Ehsani P (2017) Biomedical applications of
yeast-a patent view, part one: yeasts as workhorses for the production of therapeutics and vac-
cines. Expert Opin Ther Pat 27(8):929–951 Shakweer WME, Krivoruchko AY, Dessouki SM, Khattab AA (2023) A review of transgenic ani-
mal techniques and their applications. J Genet Engineer Biotechnol 21(1):1–14 Siew YY, Zhang W (2021) Downstream processing of recombinant human insulin and its ana-
logues production from E. coli inclusion bodies. Bioresour Bioprocess 8(1):1–27 Sobolewska-Ruta A, Zaleski P (2019) Cell banks preparation in biopharmaceuticals production.
Post Mikrob Adv Microbiol 58(1):87–100 Strohl WR, Knight DM (2009) Discovery and development of biopharmaceuticals: current issues.
Curr Opin Biotechnol 20(6):668–672 Vecchio I, Tornali C, Bragazzi NL, Martini M (2018) The discovery of insulin: an important mile-
stone in the history of medicine. Front Endocrinol 9:613 Walsh G (2000) Biopharmaceutical benchmarks. Nat Biotechnol 18(8):831–833 Wang S, Cui J, Bilal M, Hu H, Wang W, Zhang X (2020) Pseudomonas spp. as cell factories
(MCFs) for value-added products: from rational design to industrial applications. Crit Rev
Biotechnol 40(8):1232–1249
101
Chapter 7
https://t.me/med1917
Drug Delivery inBiotechnology: Present andFuture
SeemaYadav, NarahariNarayanPalei, SubasChandraDinda, andArghyaKusumDhar
Abstract Nanobiotechnology is the integration of nanotechnology with biotech-
nology, with a specic emphasis on the utilisation of nanoscale techniques in bio­logical systems. Nanobiotechnology signicantly contributes to the eld of drug delivery by utilising nanoscale materials, such as nanoparticles and liposomes, to enhance the effectiveness of medications. Nanoparticles possess a reduced size and altered properties that provide accurate drug localisation, regulated release, and enhanced bioavailability. This offers distinctive resolutions to challenges encoun­tered in conventional drug administration techniques. Herein we highlight the sig­nicance of achieving optimal drug delivery and subsequently explore the potential of biotechnology to address these challenges. We explore contemporary methodolo­gies, including the utilisation of nanotechnology for targeted drug delivery. Additionally, we discuss intelligent drug delivery systems, including those that are triggered by specic inputs or guided by articial intelligence. The development of biodegradable implants, the use of articial intelligence for personalised treatment, and the creation of microbes for the administration of drugs are also discussed. The chapter includes coverage of cutting-edge technology such as 3D printing for the customisation of medication forms and continuous monitoring devices, highlighting the important ethical inquiries and safety hazards linked to these novel methods. Finally, it provides a concise overview of the key progress made and anticipated breakthroughs in drug delivery that have the potential to transform healthcare.
S. Yadav · N. N. Palei Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Lucknow Campus, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
S. C. Dinda · A. K. Dhar (*) School of Pharmacy, The Neotia University, Sarisa, West Bengal, India
Ltd. 2024 S. Bose et al. (eds.), Concepts in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology and Drug Development, Interdisciplinary Biotechnological Advances,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1148-2_7
103© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte
104
https://t.me/med1917
Keywords Nanobiotechnology · Drug delivery · Monoclonal antibody · 3D printing
S. Yadav et al.
7.1 Introduction
The topic of medication delivery is expanding quickly and attracting the interest of industry, scientists, and pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical researchers’ “holy grail” is developing efcient drug delivery systems (DDSs) that can deliver a medication precisely, safely, and to the intended location of action (Morris 2022). In fact, a plethora of new delivery systems are developed every year, and almost every bodily region has been investigated as a possible delivery system for both established and cutting-edge medications. As a result, effective methods for deliv­ering peptides, proteins, and medicines that are poorly soluble have been devel­oped. Furthermore, a great deal of research is now being done on innovative nasal drug delivery systems, nanodevices, bio-adhesive systems, micro-fabricated sys­tems, implants, transdermal patches, and cell encapsulation devices. These and other innovations are causing a signicant shift in the drug delivery sector. A new market for drug delivery is emerging because of increasing demand brought about by market extension, reduced drug development budgets, and novel formulations that provide a competitive edge once patents expire. In 2003, the drug delivery systems market in the US was valued at approximately $43.7 billion. It was pro­jected to experience an average annual growth rate of 11.3% and reach $74.5 billion by 2008 (Burrows and Lambrix 2022). This information comes from a recent study from Business Communications Company Inc. Within the broad topic of biotech­nology, medication delivery represents an important interface between basic sci­ence and therapeutic use (Aslam etal. 2022). The key to increasing the effectiveness of medications while reducing unwanted side effects is the capacity to precisely and efciently distribute therapeutic chemicals to target areas within the body. Thanks to developments in biotechnological research and development, the design and implementation of DDSs have advanced signicantly over the past few decades (Aslam etal. 2022). As a multidisciplinary area, biotechnology uses the ability to manipulate biological systems, cells, and live beings to create novel solutions for problems in healthcare. Biotechnology goes beyond traditional drug delivery tech­niques to enhance pharmaceutical substances’ pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and targeted delivery. Addressing the intricacies of many diseases, such as cancer, viral diseases, autoimmune disorders, and hereditary problems, requires a compre­hensive approach. The fusion of biology, chemistry, engineering, and material sci­ence characterises the current biotechnology drug delivery landscape (Liu etal.
2022). Scholars are presently investigating novel platforms for encapsulating and
delivering medicinal substances, including liposomes, micelles, nanoparticles (NPs), and biocompatible polymers. With the ability to customise these carriers, it will be possible to achieve site-specic delivery, sustained activity, and controlled release with a degree of accuracy that was previously unattainable with traditional
7 Drug Delivery inBiotechnology: Present andFuture
https://t.me/med1917
105
drug administration techniques. This review addresses new technologies being researched to get around some of the present challenges with drug delivery and highlights innovative drug delivery systems that potentially enhance some tradi­tional treatments now available on the market. We also discuss how these difcul­ties should be tackled to develop the profession and offer our perspective on the drug delivery research policies (Birla etal. 2022).
DDSs have come a long way, but there are still several issues that need to be resolved, which calls for continued research and development. Overcoming biologi­cal barriers to guarantee the secure and efcient delivery of therapeutic payloads to tissues or cells is one of the main obstacles. A number of complex defence systems found in the human body, such as blood-brain barrier (BBB) and other physiologi­cal barriers, can prevent medications from reaching their intended targets (Mandal et al. 2023). Nanotechnology has become an increasingly potent weapon in the medication delivery arsenal as a response to these obstacles. Nanoscale delivery agents, like NPs, have demonstrated the capacity to get past immunological reac­tions, cross physiological barriers, and release their payload at the desired location of action. Additionally, the surface of these nanocarriers can be altered to improve their targeting efciency, enabling the more accurate delivery of therapeutic medi­cines. Finding a balance between safety and therapeutic efcacy is a signicant difculty in drug delivery. At high concentrations, many pharmaceuticals show strong effects, but this is frequently at the expense of increased toxicity and unfa­vourable responses. By offering regulated release and long-term maintenance of therapeutic levels in the body, drug delivery systems seek to address these problems. This improves patient adherence and quality of life while minimising side effects and increasing treatment efcacy overall (Awad et al. 2022). Drug delivery has advanced signicantly in the last several years because of researchers’ exploration of novel materials and methods to address long-standing issues. Because of their special physicochemical characteristics, NPs have gained a lot of interest in drug delivery studies (Park etal. 2022). These submicron-sized carriers provide protec­tion and regulated release for a range of therapeutic substances, like proteins, nucleic acids, and tiny compounds. Another class of nanocarriers are liposomes, which are made of phospholipid bilayers and can hold both hydrophilic and hydro­phobic medications. Antibiotics, vaccinations, and anticancer medications have all been delivered effectively using liposomal formulations. The fact that they can increase drug solubility, increase the duration of circulation, and improve drug accumulation at the target location has led to their extensive application in preclini­cal and clinical settings (Hersh et al. 2022). Drug delivery by the formation of micelles, which are created when amphiphilic molecules self-assemble in aqueous solutions, is another exciting prospect. These nanostructures can increase the bio­availability of hydrophobic medications by solubilising them. To further increase their versatility in drug delivery applications, micelles’ amphiphilic nature permits the integration of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic components. Poly (lactic-co­glycolic acid) (PLGA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG), two biocompatible poly­mers, are now essential parts of DDS designs. Because of the adjustable qualities of these polymers, carriers with release patterns and degradation kinetics can be