Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3823_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
sheath should be opened to allow back‐bleeding of any
retained clot. An angiogram is performed to evaluate for
residual thrombus. If present, aspiration through the
guide catheter can be repeated after replacing the wire
(Figure 7.7).
Dedicated thrombectomy catheters such as the Export
(Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 5MAX ACE
(Penumbra, Alameda, CA, USA) have also been used
with success. The Export catheter has a dual lumen
design which allows for the guidewire to remain in place
while thrombus is aspirated through the second lumen.
This design facilitates multiple passes without having to
replace a wire in between aspirations. The 5MAX ACE
catheter is available in several sizes with the largest inner
diameter size of 0.068″. Aspiration of the Penumbra
family of catheters is facilitated through a proprietary
pump system. Once the Penumbra aspiration catheter is
advanced to the level of the thrombus, the wire is
removed, and the aspiration tubing is connected to the
catheter. The pump is turned on and the thrombus is
aspirated. In both aspiration systems, the device should
be completely withdrawn from the patient’s body. Any
clot should be expelled and the catheter flushed before
reintroducing it for another sweep if necessary.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/

Figure 7.7 6 Fr 55 cm vascular sheath advanced into the
SMA via a right femoral approach. A Penumbra
thrombectomy catheter has been placed coaxially and is
used to aspirate thrombus.
Step 4. Angiogram
A postaspiration angiogram is performed. A residual
disease can be treated with angioplasty, thrombolysis, or
stent placement (Figures 7.8 and 7.9).
Step 5. Thrombolysis
A hydrophilic guidewire is advanced through the
thrombus. A variety of multi‐sidehole infusion catheters
are available including standard infusion and an EKOS
ultrasound augmented infusion catheter (BTG, London,
UK). A treatment length of 10 cm is sufficient. After
confirming the catheter positioning, the wire can be

removed, and infusion started. If an EKOS catheter is
used, the wire is exchanged for a transducer wire. The
transducers emit a high‐frequency, low ultrasound
energy which loosens the fibrin lattice within the clot.
This enhances the penetration of the thrombolytic agent
and exposes more plasminogen receptor sites.
Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) is the
most commonly used lytic agent. TPA is infused through
the catheter directly into the thrombus at a rate of 0.5–1
mg/h.
Figure 7.8 Residual stenosis (arrow) after aspiration of
thrombus.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/

Figure 7.9 Angioplasty of stenotic lesion in SMA using
Savvy 5 mm × 4 cm angioplasty balloon (Cordis, Milpitas,
CA) over a V‐18 wire.
Step 6. Infusion and Follow‐Up
Infusion times can range from 12 to 24 hours and can be
done in a monitored unit setting. The vascular access
sheath and infusion catheter should be secured to
prevent accidental movement or dislodgment. The
patient can then be transferred out of the angiography
suite as TPA is infusing. During infusion, arterial
punctures should be avoided. Fibrinogen and partial
thromboplastin time (PTT) should be monitored every
six hours. If fibrinogen levels fall below 150, the TPA
dose should be halved, and if below 100 – TPA should be
discontinued. After completing the infusion, the patient
will return for an angiogram, and treatment of any
underlying stenosis with angioplasty or stent placement.
Stent placement, if necessary, should be done with a
balloon‐expandable stent. The principles of stent
placement are similar to CMI.

Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis
If a diagnosis of mesenteric venous thrombosis is made,
and there is no evidence of peritonitis, medical
management with anticoagulation is first‐line therapy.
The use of intravenous systemic intravenous TPA has
been reported with success [36], though is rarely used
due to risk of bleeding. If signs of peritonitis develop,
emergency surgery with resection of necrotic bowel is
indicated. If the patient is not improving with
anticoagulation alone, a trans‐jugular intrahepatic
portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be placed followed by
thrombectomy and/or lysis of the mesenteric venous
clot. The shunt will function as a low‐resistance outflow
tract for the effected mesenteric vein. The technique of
TIPS placement is beyond the scope of this chapter.
Follow‐Up and Outcomes
Patients will require lifelong therapy depending on the
etiology of AMI. Embolic disease will necessitate
anticoagulation therapy with coumadin or an alternate.
Those patients with arterial thrombosis should be
treated with a statin and an antiplatelet agent [28].
Patients with AMI treated with endovascular therapy
have a 12.3% in‐hospital mortality rate compared with
33.1% for open surgical revascularization. Endovascular
therapy is also associated with a lower mean
hospitalization cost and decreased risk of acute renal
failure [37].
References
1 Zelenock, G.B., Graham, L.M., Whitehouse, W.M. Jr. et
al. (1980). Splanchnic arteriosclerotic disease and
intestinal angina. Arch. Surg. 115: 497–501.
2 Pillai, A.K., Kalva, S.P., Hsu, S.L. et al. (2008). Quality
improvement guidelines for meseteric angioplasty and
stent placement for the treatment of chronic
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/

mesenteric ischemia. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 19: 642–
647.
3 Thomas, J.H., Blake, K., Pierce, G.E. et al. (1998). The
clinical course of asymptomatic mesenteric arterial
stenosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 27: 840–844.
4 Rose, M.K., Pearce, B.J., Matthews, T.C. et al. (2015).
Outcomes after celiac artery coverage during thoracic
endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg.
62: 36–42.
5 Nakamura, T., Hirano, S., Noji, T. et al. (2016). Distal
pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection
(modified Appleby procedure) for locally advanced
pancreatic body cancer: a single‐center review of 80
consecutive patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23 (suppl 5):
969–975.
6 Schermerhorn, M.L., Giles, K.A., Hamdan, A.D. et al.
(2009). Mesenteric revascularization: management
and outcomes in the United States, 1988–2006. J.
Vasc. Surg. 50: 341–348.
7 Alahdab, F., Arwani, R., Pash, A.K. et al. (2008). A
systemic review and meta‐analysis of endovascular
versus open surgical revascularization for chronic
mesenteric ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 67: 1598–1605.
8 American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness
Criteria® Radiologic management of mesenteric
ischemia.
https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69501/Narrative/revis
ed 2022.
9 Pecoraro, F., Ancic, Z., Lachat, M. et al. (2013).
Chronic mesenteric ischemia: critical review and
guidelines for management. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 27: 113–
122.
10 Atkins, M.D., Kwolek, C.J., LaMuraglia, G.M. et al.
(2007). Surgical revascularization versus
endovascular therapy for chronic mesenteric

ischemia: a comparative experience. J. Vasc. Surg. 45:
1162–1171.
11 Silva, J.A., White, C.J., Collins, T.J. et al. (2006).
Endovascular therapy for chronic mesenteric
ischemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47: 944–950.
12 Aburahma, A.F., Campbell, J.E., Stone, P.A. et al.
(2013). Perioperative and late clinical outcomes of
percutaneous transluminal stentings of the celiac and
superior mesenteric arteries over the past decade. J.
Vasc. Surg. 57: 1052–1061.
13 Sarac, T.P., Altinel, O., Kashyap, V. et al. (2008).
Endovascular treatment of stenotic and occluded
visceral arteries for chronic mesenteric ischemia. J.
Vasc. Surg. 47: 485–491.
14 Grilli, C.J., Fedele, C.R., Tair, O.M. et al. (2004).
Recanalization of chronic total occlusions of the
superior mesenteric artery in patients with chronic
ischemia: technical and clinical outcomes. J. Vasc.
Interv. Radiol. 25: 1515–1522.
15 Mendes, B.C., Oderich, G.S., Tallarita, T. et al. (2018).
Superior mesenteric artery stenting using embolic
protection device for treatment of acute or chronic
mesenteric ischemia. Society for Vascular Surgery
678 (4): 1071–1078.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.076.
16 Oderich, G.S., Tallarita, T., Gloviczki, P. et al. (2012).
Mesenteric artery complications during angioplasty
and stent placement for atherosclerotic chronic
mesenteric ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 55: 1063–1071.
17 Oderich, G.S., Bower, T.C., Sullivan, T.M. et al.
(2009). Open versus endovascular revascularization
for chronic mesenteric ischemia: risk‐stratified
outcomes. J. Vasc. Surg. 49: 1472–1479.
18 Peck, M.A., Conrad, M.F., Kwolek, C.J. et al. (2010).
Intermediate‐term outcomes of endovascular
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/

treatment for symptomatic chronic mesenteric
ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 51: 140–146.
19 Bieble, M., Oldenburg, W.A., Paz‐Fumagalli et al.
(2007). Surgical and interventional visceral
revascularization for the treatment of chronic
mesenteric ischemia‐when to prefer which? World J.
Surg. 31: 562–568.
20 Fioole, B., van de Rest, H.J., Meijer, J.R. et al. (2010).
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting
as first‐choice treatment in patients with chronic
mesenteric ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 51: 386–391.
21 Sharafuddin, M.J., Olson, C.H., Sun, S. et al. (2003).
Endovascular treatment of celiac and mesenteric
arteries stenoses: applications and results. J. Vasc.
Surg. 38: 692–698.
22 Matsumoto, A.H., Angle, J.F., Spinosa, D.J. et al.
(2002). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and
stenting in the treatment of chronic mesenteric
ischemia: results and longterm followup. J. Am. Coll.
Surg. 194 (1 suppl): S22–S31.
23 Oderich, G.S., Erdoes, L.S., Lesar, C. et al. (2013).
Comparison of covered stents versus bare metal stents
for treatment of chronic atherosclerotic mesenteric
arterial disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 58: 1316–1323.
24 Turba, U.C., Saad, W.E., Arslan, B. et al. (2012).
Chronic mesenteric ischaemia: 28‐year experience of
endovascular treatment. Eur. Radiol. 22: 1372–1384.
25 Horton, K.M. and Fishman, E.K. (2007).
Multidetector CT angiography in the diagnosis of
mesenteric ischemia. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 45:
275–288.
26 Schoots, I.G., Koffeman, G.I., Legemate, D.A. et al.
(2004). Systematic review of survival after acute
mesenteric ischaemia according to disease aetiology.
Br. J. Surg. 91: 17–27.

27 Beaulieu, R.J., Arnaoutakis, K.D., Abularrage, C.J. et
al. (2014). Comparison of open and endovascular
treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg.
59: 159–164.
28 Acosta, S. (2015). Mesenteric ischemia. Curr. Opin.
Crit. Care 21: 171–178.
29 Clair, D.G. and Beach, J.M. (2016). Mesenteric
Ischemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 374: 959–968.
30 Bala, M., Kashuk, J., Moore, E. et al. (2017). Acute
mesenteric ischemia guidelines of the World Society
of Emergency surgery. World J. Emerg. Surg. 12: 38–
49.
31 Peters, J.H., Reilly, P.M., and Merine, D.S. (1991).
Textbook of Gastroenterology. Philadelphia:
Lippincott.
32 Kougias, P., Lau, D., El Sayed, H.F. et al. (2007).
Determinants of morbidity and treatmet outcome
following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric
ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 46: 467–474.
33 Aschoff, A.J., Stuber, G., Becker, B.W. et al. (2009).
Evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: accuracy of
biphasic mesenteric multi‐detector CT angiography.
Abdom. Imaging 34: 345–357.
34 Menke, J. (2010). Diagnostic accuracy of
multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia:
systematic review and meta‐analysis. Radiology 256:
93–101.
35 Silvestri, L., van Saene, H.K., Zandstra, D.F. et al.
(2010). Impact of selective decontamination of the
digestive tract on multiple organ dysfunction
syndrome: systematic review of randomized
controlled trials. Crit. Care Med. 38: 1370–1376.
36 Hmoud, B., Singal, A.K., and Kamath, P.S. (2014).
Mesenteric venous thrombosis. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol.
4: 257–263.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/

37 Erben, Y., Protack, C.D., Jean, R.A. et al. (2018).
Endovascular interventions decrease length of
hospitalization and are cost‐effective in acute
mesenteric ischeia. J. Vasc. Surg. 68: 459–469.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
