Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5397_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Chapter 14
https://t.me/med1917
Gene Therapy inMolecular Biology
andDrug Delivery
DineshKumarLakshmiNarayanan
Abstract The objective of gene therapy is to manipulate/modify the gene
expression or modify living cell characteristics for therapeutic utilization. It
aims to achieve therapeutic effects by either inserting novel genes, rectifying or
substituting the genes that are abnormal, or modifying the pre-existing gene
expression. The therapy shows potential in addressing a diverse array of genetic
and acquired disorders. This includes certain types of cancer, hereditary genetic
diseases like muscular dystrophy and cystic brosis, and other circumstances
where genetic factors have a signicant inuence. Gene therapy can be accomplished by several mechanisms, namely, gene editing, gene replacement, gene
addition, and gene silencing. Gene replacement involves the replacement of
malfunctioning genes with the functional copy in the patient’s cells. Gene editing pertains to technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the specic gene in the
patient’s cells. In a genetic condition caused by a missing gene, the gene addition procedure can add a functioning copy of that gene to the patient’s cells to
compensate for the deciencies. In genetic disorders resulting from the overexpression of genes, gene silencing can be applied to reduce the expression or
downregulation of these genes by techniques such as RNA interference (RNAi).
Gene therapy holds promising possibilities and represents an innovative
approach to drug delivery. It has the capacity to eliminate the necessity for frequent injections of proteins or medications, thereby alleviating the challenges
associated with adhering to external drug schedules.
Keywords Gene editing · Gene addition · Gene silencing · Drug delivery ·
Molecular biology
D. K. L. Narayanan (*)
Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia
e-mail: dineshkumar@aimst.edu.my
Ltd. 2024
S. Bose et al. (eds.), Concepts in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology and Drug
Development, Interdisciplinary Biotechnological Advances,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1148-2_14
279© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte

280
https://t.me/med1917
D. K. L. Narayanan
14.1 Introduction
Gene therapy refers to the control of gene expression within a cellular environment,
accomplished through the introduction of new or altered genetic material or the
replacement of existing genes in order to cure the disease or to mitigate the clinical
condition of a patient. The eld of molecular medicine, specically gene therapy,
holds great potential for making substantial advancements in human health in the
future. New approaches to therapy are expected to be developed for a wide array of
hereditary and acquired disorders. The mechanism by which gene therapy works are
(a) Gene Replacement in which a mutated or malfunctioning gene is replaced with
a healthy gene copy, (b) Gene Silencing involves the inactivating or “silencing” the
hyperactive or malfunctioning gene, and (c) Introduction of new or modied gene
into the cell to treat the disease (Verma and Weitzman 2005).
Gene defects can result in a variety of diseases, such as hemophilia, muscular dystrophy, cystic brosis, combined immunodeciency syndromes, and various cancers.
Gene therapy can be employed to rectify or substitute defective genes. Gene therapy
has shown remarkable and long-lasting therapeutic improvement when employed to
treat combined immunodeciency disorders. Gene therapy has the ability to eradicate
cancerous cells, prevent cardiovascular diseases, ameliorate neurological disorders,
and completely eradicate pathogens (Cotrim and Baum 2008).
Various methodologies, including addition, editing (repair), deletion or knockout
(suppression), and others, can be implemented, dependent upon the underlying
genetic issue.
Mechanisms Involved in Gene Therapy
(i) Adding the normal form of gene to enhance gene expression. For example,
introducing the normal allele for human clotting factor IX with the aim of
facilitating the expression of factor IX in individuals affected by hemophilia
type B disease.
(ii) Introducing a genetically altered gene into cells to elicit novel traits in them.
For example, inserting CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) structures in CAR-T
cells and inducing immune reaction to target specic cancer cells.
(iii) Introducing suicide genes or gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT)
into cells to induce cytotoxicity substance or enzyme. For example, inserting
thymidine kinase to induce salvage pathway thereby targeting cancer cells.
(iv) Gene therapies also involve vaccination by the insertion of a specic antigen to
induce immunity, e.g., COVID-19 vaccine (Arabi etal. 2022).
14.1.1 Brief History ofGene Therapy
Waclaw Szybalski, a Polish American scientist, made important contributions to our
understanding of genetic processes. He was aware that cells can integrate foreign
DNA into their own genomes. He studied lambda phages to gain insight into gene

14 Gene Therapy inMolecular Biology andDrug Delivery
https://t.me/med1917
281
transfer. A decade following the initial observation that bacteriophages possess the
ability to transfer genetic material between bacteria, Howard Temin made a signicant discovery that demonstrated the inheritance of specic genetic changes through
viral infection. The researcher reached the conclusion that chicken cells that have
been infected with the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) exhibited stable inheritance of
viral-specic gene changes, which included the necessary information for the production of RSV progeny, based on his experimental observations. The enormous
therapeutic potential of introducing DNA sequences into patients’ cells to address
hereditary disorders was highlighted by renowned scientists Theodore Friedmann
and Richard Roblin. Nearly 18years after considerable study on gene therapy prospects, the retrovirus was used to generate a neomycin-resistant marker on tumorinltrating lymphocytes so that inltrating lymphocytes could be detected in
melanoma treatment. The rst clinical experiment employing gene therapy was performed to treat severe combined immunodeciency (SCID) disorder, which is
caused by a defective adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene. In 1990, to treat a 4-yearold kid, a functioning copy of the adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene using a viral
vector was injected. The success of this clinical trial showcased the possibility of
gene therapy. The success of the above-mentioned trial also paved the way for many
trials in the gene therapy eld (Wirth etal. 2013). However, severe adverse effects
were also reported while employing vectors of viral origin. These vectors apart from
the severe adverse effects also caused immunological reactions as well as insertional mutagenesis. These incidents did hinder the advancement of this type of therapy. In 2000, a clinical trial was conducted in Paris for X-linked severe combined
immunodeciency, which is caused by mutations in the IL2RG gene located in the
X chromosome. The vector employed to carry the normal copy of the gene induced
the oncogene resulting in leukemia in 5 out of 20 infants who received treatment. In
a separate gene therapy trial done in London, Thrasher and colleagues reported an
additional instance of leukemia following retroviral-mediated gene therapy for
SCID.An unfortunate case of death of an 18-year old happened in 1999 who was
diagnosed with ornithine transcarbamylase deciency and volunteered for the ornithine transcarbamylase gene encoding adenoviral vector gene transfer trial. While
these setbacks hindered the progress of gene therapy, they also revealed the promising future and potential of this therapeutic approach. Many gene therapy products
were approved for the treatment of various disorders. The rst gene therapy product
to receive regulatory approval was Gendicine, approved in China in 2003 for the
treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Following this, Strimvelis
gained conditional marketing authorization from the European Medicines Agency
(EMA) in 2016 for the treatment of severe combined immunodeciency. In 2017,
the USFDA approved Kymriah, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, for pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Later in 2017, the FDA also approved Luxturna for the
treatment of inherited retinal dystrophy caused by mutations in the RPE65 gene.
Zolgensma, a gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), received FDA
approval in 2019. These approvals represent signicant milestones in the evolving
eld of gene therapy, showcasing its potential for treating a range of genetic and

282
https://t.me/med1917
Table 14.1 Examples of gene therapy products that are currently approved for use
Details of gene transferred/
Gene therapy product
Vitravene (Fomivirsen) An antisense oligonucleotide
Gendicine p53 gene (tumor suppressor
Oncorine (H101) E1B-deleted adenovirus
Rexin-G (Mx-dnG1/
DeltaRex-G)
Neovasculgen
(Cambiogenplasmid/
PI-VEGF165)
Imlygic (Talimogene
Laherparepvec),
melanoma
Strimvelis (GSK2696273) Adenosine deaminase gene Severe combined immunodeciency
Collategene
(Beperminogene
perplasmid)
modication Indication
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in
designed to target the UL123
gene of cytomegalovirus
(CMV)
gene)
(genetically modied
oncolytic adenovirus)
A genetically altered version
of cyclin G1
Vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF) (angiogenic
factor)
Addition of GMCSF Advanced melanoma
Hepatocyte growth factor
(HGF)
patients with AIDS (acquired
immunodeciency syndrome)
(withdrawn in 2002)
Head and neck cancer
Late-stage refractory
nasopharyngeal cancer
Soft tissue sarcoma and
osteosarcoma
Peripheral vascular disease and limb
ischemia
disorder
Critical limb ischemia
D. K. L. Narayanan
acquired disorders. Several products are also now being reviewed by regulatory
agencies (Arabi etal. 2022) (Table14.1).
14.2 Gene Delivery System
Effective gene therapy relies on the signicance of gene delivery systems, as they
facilitate the transportation and introduction of therapeutic genetic material into
precise target cells. The selection of the delivery mechanism is based on specic cell
types, the characteristics of the genetic material involved, and safety concerns. They
can be categorized broadly as viral vectors and nonviral vectors. Both the delivery
systems have their own merits and demerits based on which system is selected.
14.2.1 Viral Vectors
A wide variety of viral vectors are available as delivery vehicles. They are specically engineered to facilitate either temporary or sustained long-term expression. It
comprises viruses composed of RNA and DNA, either double-stranded or

14 Gene Therapy inMolecular Biology andDrug Delivery
https://t.me/med1917
283
single- stranded genomes. Vectors from the following ve types of viruses are commonly employed in gene therapy: oncoretroviral, lentivirus, adenoviruses, adenoassociated viruses (AAVs), and herpes virus. Lentiviruses and oncoretroviruses are
capable of integrating into the chromatin of the host cell, while adenoviruses,
adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), and herpesviruses persist within the nucleus of
the cell (Ghosh etal. 2020).
Adeno Virus andAdeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Vectors
Adenoviruses serve as frequently employed viral vectors in gene delivery systems,
accommodating up to 7.5 kb of foreign DNA and demonstrating the capacity to
initiate expression within the host cell. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are
extensively utilized in gene transfer for the treatment of human diseases.
Adenoviruses have a complex icosahedral capsid structure and a double-stranded
DNA genome; they are nonenveloped, larger viruses (36–40 kilobase pairs (kb)).
Persistent gene expression over an extended period is accomplished by employing
adeno-associated virus vectors, and this capability extends to both dividing and
nondividing cells. In contrast, adenoviruses are predominantly regarded for transient gene expression. Adeno-associated Viruses (AAVs) are nonenveloped, smaller
viruses (4.7 kilobase pairs (kb) in size) with a more basic capsid structure and a
single-stranded DNA genome. Recent advancements in the production of therapeutically valuable AAV capsids, the optimization of genome designs, and the application of novel biotechnologies have all made substantial contributions to the growth
of the eld. AAV’s standing as a prospective therapeutic vector has been enhanced
by preclinical and clinical achievements pertaining to gene silencing, editing, and
replacement facilitated by AAV (Wang etal. 2019).
The adenovirus is a type of virus that does not have a protective outer layer. It
mainly affects the upper respiratory tract, but it can also move to other parts of the
body like the brain and bladder. The protein capsid of this virus is shaped like an icosahedron and has double-stranded linear DNA genome. The length of the genome can
vary between 26 and 45 kilobases. In the adenovirus genome, inverted terminal repeats
(ITRs) encapsulate the genetic material. These ITRs are like hairpins and can range in
length from 30 to 371 base pairs. ITRs help with DNA replication without needing
primases by acting as self-priming structures. To package the viral genome, it is
important to have a packaging signal located on the left side of the genome. The adenovirus genome can synthesize 35 various proteins at different times during the viral
gene transcription process, both in the early and late phases. The adenovirus genome
encompasses ve genes recognized as “early-phase” genes: E1A, E1B, E2, E3, and
E4. The E1A gene holds signicance in activating other viral genes, including E1B,
E2, E3, and E4. These genes contribute to viral DNA synthesis and inuence the
host’s gene expression. Specically, E1B plays a crucial role in preventing apoptosis
by interacting with and inactivating p53, facilitating virus replication. These viral vectors have been employed in the treatment of hereditary conditions such as hemophilia,
muscular dystrophy, and certain forms of blindness.

284
https://t.me/med1917
D. K. L. Narayanan
Advantages of Adenovirus-Associated Vectors (Bulcha etal. 2021)
1. Excellent transduction effectiveness in both quiescent and proliferating cells
2. Long-term transgenic expression by chromosomal integration
3. Adaptability to a wide range of tissue targets
4. The availability of production methods that can be scaled up
5. Low pathogenicity and toxicity
Disadvantages of Adenovirus-Associated Vectors (Lundstrom 2018)
1. Small packaging capacity
2. Immunogenicity of adenoviruses during continuous administration
3. Rare risk of insertional mutagenesis
4. Some individuals may have pre-existing immunity to AAV due to previous
exposure
Lentivirus
Lentiviruses, which have a packaging capacity of 8 kilobase pairs (kb), are a subgroup of retroviruses. These vectors consist of a positive-sense RNA sequence,
which is a single strand transcribed into DNA and subsequently integrated into the
host genome (Lundstrom 2019). Scientists have engineered lentiviral vectors from
different types of lentiviruses to make it easier for them to deliver genes. Lentivirus
possesses gag, pol, and env genes as its fundamental components. These genes are
tasked with encoding various elements of the virus. The gag gene is responsible for
encoding structural proteins, and the pol gene encodes enzymes essential for processes like reverse transcription and integration into the host cell’s genome. The env
gene encodes the glycoproteins found in the viral envelope. Lentivirus vectors are
composed of long terminal repeats (LTRs), serving as cis-acting components necessary for packaging and integration. These vectors carry the gene of interest, regulated by a promoter. Pseudotyping of lentiviral vector envelopes enhances their
tropism or cell-targeting capabilities. Examples of frequently used envelope proteins include the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus G protein (LCMV-GP) and the
feline endogenous virus RD114 envelope. Another example is the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G), which broadens the host range. Lentivectors also
contain packaging cassettes with trans-elements transcribed from the gag and pol
genes, encompassing structural and enzymatic proteins crucial for vector particle
generation and effective transduction of target cells. Accessory proteins, additional
trans-elements encoded by lentiviruses, are essential for successful infection and
replication within the host organism. Plasmid genes are modiable to prevent insertional mutagenesis. Due to their ability to invade nondividing cells, lentiviral vectors are applied to target a wide range of cell and tissue types. They have found
extensive use in gene therapy applications, including the treatment of specic
immunodeciencies and the development of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies for cancer treatment (Cockrell and Kafri 2007).

14 Gene Therapy inMolecular Biology andDrug Delivery
https://t.me/med1917
Advantages of Lentivirus Vectors (Zheng etal. 2018)
1. They exhibit procient transduction in various tissues.
2. They also exhibit stable and long-term transgene expression.
3. A diverse array of proliferating and nondividing cells can be efciently infected
by lentiviral vectors.
4. Lentiviral vectors are capable of accommodating transgene sequences of
larger size.
5. Lentiviral vectors are quite safe and have a low immunogenicity.
6. Lentiviruses are compatible with housekeeping gene promoters as well as pro-
moters for specic cells or tissues.
7. Lentiviral vectors swiftly induce transgene expression.
Disadvantages of Lentivirus Vectors (Schlimgen etal. 2016)
1. LVV-infected cells may activate oncogenes or inactivate tumor suppressor genes.
2. Risk of developing a replication-competent virus: lentiviral particles are capable
of replicating in host cells.
3. Insertional mutagenesis.
4. Risk of insertional mutagenesis and oncogenesis in professional healthcare pro-
fessionals and the exposed individual.
5. Integration of lentiviral vectors poses a risk of altering cellular gene expression
patterns in the host genome.
285
14.2.2 Nonviral Vectors
Nonviral vectors, as employed in gene therapy, are delivery techniques that do not
involve viral agents. Consistently regarded as less hazardous than viral vectors,
these vectors elicit fewer adverse immune reactions and possess a diminished propensity for immunogenicity. The potential risk involved with viral vectors such as
transgene mutagenesis also led to seeking a nonviral delivery system. Polymers,
lipids, nanoparticles, inorganic particles, or combinations of these are some of the
nonviral carriers that are being researched extensively (Zu and Gao 2021).
Polymer-Based Vectors
Notable nonviral gene therapy vectors are mostly cationic polymers. Due to their
potentially enormous information-holding ability and exible chemical structure,
they have long sparked the interest of scientists. A complex (polyplex) capable of
conveying the payload to a specic cell can be produced by neutralizing the negatively charged genetic material (Zu and Gao 2021).
Nonbiodegradable polymers such as polyethyleneimine (PEI) and biodegradable
polymers such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are employed as vectors. The

286
https://t.me/med1917
D. K. L. Narayanan
surface of polyethyleneimine (PEI) exhibits a substantial quantity of positive charge,
enabling its adsorption in conjunction with negatively charged nucleic acid medications via electrostatic interactions. The adsorption process acts to protect the nucleic
acid pharmaceuticals against degradation within the lysosomes. Yet it should be noted
that invivo degradation of PEI is not feasible, and its application development is hindered by its considerable toxicity. As it is not biodegradable and builds up around the
cells, it will result in cytotoxicity. Biodegradable polymeric vectors have less cytotoxicity and can be administered continuously. PLGA is a biodegradable polymer that
can be used to encapsulate genetic material and release it over time. As far as their
chemical structure and batch consistency are concerned, synthetic polymers display a
remarkable variety; nonetheless, it is possible that they have limited contact with the
constituents of cells. Natural polymers have a notable degree of biocompatibility, yet
they provide challenges in terms of batch-to-batch variance owing to disparities in
their origins. Therefore, to ensure the quality of the product, it is necessary to implement control measures for the major properties of natural polymers.
Lipid-Based Vectors
Liposomes, lipid-based vectors, are the most commonly employed nonviral vectors.
Liposomes are synthetic vesicles that replicate the structure of cell membranes by
having lipid bilayers. These platforms offer a exible and biocompatible method for
encapsulating and transporting nucleic acids. The synthesis of a wide variety of
lipids led to the creation of a system that can deliver genomes. The liposomal system is very adaptive and versatile. Liposomes have proven to be the most effective
nonviral vectors to date. Various liposomal formulations have been previously
developed, with cationic lipid-based liposomes exhibiting the highest efcacy in
delivery. The lipids of cationic nature can be used to generate cationic liposomes,
either alone or with additional lipids (known as helper lipids), depending on their
chemical composition and the conditions used for liposome manufacturing. The
interaction between cationic liposomes and DNA results in the spontaneous formation of complexes, known as lipoplexes, exhibiting a DNA loading efciency of
100%. The complex is thought to be a resultant of the interaction between the negative charge of DNA with the positive charge groups of the liposomes. The proportion of lipids to DNA and the overall concentrations of lipids used to create these
complexes are important factors in ensuring successful gene delivery. These factors
can vary depending on the specic applications.
Liposomes have several advantages in gene therapy such as (i) inexpensive production as they are synthetic; (ii) they possess the ability to safeguard DNA against
degradation facilitated by nucleases; (iii) they can transport chromosomal-sized DNA
fragments; and (iv) they have the capability to selectively target specic cells or tissues. Several clinical trials have used a range of liposome-based vectors for the treatment of cancer. Despite their advantages, lipid-based vectors may face challenges
such as potential toxicity at high concentrations, stability issues during storage, and
limitations in cargo capacity compared to viral vectors (Guo and Huang 2012).

14 Gene Therapy inMolecular Biology andDrug Delivery
https://t.me/med1917
Nanoparticles
Nanoparticles are utilized in gene delivery due to their capacity to protect and transport genetic material to target cells. Nanoparticles can be designed with different
materials and structures to enhance stability, improve cellular uptake, and ensure
controlled release of the genes they carry. Nanoparticles are currently being studied
as potential gene delivery devices due to their advantageous qualities such as safety,
exibility, affordability, and more importantly their property of nonimmunogenicity. These qualities make nanoparticles a promising solution for overcoming challenges in gene delivery. Signicant progress in the elds of nanotechnology and
genomics has resulted in the emergence of nanoparticle-based gene therapies for
treating diverse diseases. Nanoparticle-based gene delivery systems consist of three
main components: a cationic polymer that binds to nucleic acids, a polyethylene
glycol steric stabilization agent, and a targeting ligand that attaches specic target
cells via their receptors. Nanoparticles play a crucial role in gene therapy, being
used for various purposes such as treating genetic disorders, cancer, and infectious
diseases. They are also utilized in the development of RNA-based vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccine (Chen etal. 2016).
287
14.3 CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing
CRISPR/Cas9 is a gene-editing methodology in which accurate modications to
DNA within living organisms can be performed. The CRISPR (Clustered Regularly
Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) system, when coupled with the “CRISPR
associated protein 9” enzyme, provides scientists with improved command over
genetic material through the selective modication of genes. CRISPR-associated
protein 9 (Cas9) is an RNA-guided DNA endonuclease. Its primary function is to
act as molecular scissors that can precisely cut DNA at specic locations. The guide
RNA directs Cas9 to the targeted DNA sequence, and the enzyme then induces a cut
at that precise location. Deactivated Cas9, also referred to as Cas9 nuclease, has the
remarkable ability to precisely modify the epigenetic landscape. This makes it a
versatile tool for RNA-guided DNA targeting, genome control, and imaging applications. This tool is innovative as it allows for the precise rewriting of the epigenetic
state within specic genetic sequences. Researchers can effectively utilize the programmable nature of Cas9 to leverage its RNA-guided capabilities for the precise
targeting and manipulation of specic genomic regions of interest. This not only
creates opportunities for genome editing but also offers a strong foundation for
visualizing and controlling gene expression at the molecular level (Wang etal. 2016).
CRISPR/Cas, an acquired defense mechanism against viruses and phages mediated by Cas nucleases and crRNA-based DNA recognition, was rst identied in
bacteria and archaea. The CRISPR/Cas system is present in 40% of bacterial
genomes and 90% of archaeal genomes. The CRISPR locus comprises a sequence
of spacers, which are conserved repeated sequences interspersed with Cas9 protein

288
https://t.me/med1917
D. K. L. Narayanan
and various nonrepetitive sequences. Cas nuclease is employed to break down inltrating foreign DNA into minute fragments. These fragments are subsequently
incorporated into the host genome CRISPR loci as spacers. The spacers function as
transcriptional templates to generate crRNA in reaction to phage and virus infections. This crRNA instructs Cas to cleave target DNA sequences that are present on
the invading viruses and phages. The functions of Cas proteins include crRNA biogenesis, spacer incorporation, target recognition, and DNA cleavage. The CRISPR/
Cas system functions in a multistep process. Initially, it captures and integrates
genetic material from viruses or plasmids into its CRISPR array. The array is then
transcribed and processed into guide RNA molecules (crRNA). During interference, crRNA guides Cas proteins to specic sequences in invading DNA or RNA,
leading to targeted cleavage or repression. This precise action provides immunity
and establishes a memory of encountered threats. The system evolves by adapting
to new challenges through the acquisition of additional spacers. The system is
employed in genetic engineering as a powerful tool for precise genome editing.
Applications
1. Genome editing: The system offers an effective and versatile method for editing
the genome to accurately alter the genomic segments and expedite the investigation of the roles played by target genes in biological processes and diseases. The
technique has been employed to introduce specic genomic alterations in human
cells by co-delivering plasmids encoding crRNA and Cas9.
2. Transcription regulation: The technique is utilized for examining the operation
of genes and the transcriptional network. They can alter the transcription of specic genes by disrupting functional sites associated with transcription, which
can lead to permanent modications due to their irreversible nature
modication.
3. Gene therapy: The technique can be employed for incorporating new protective
genes, repairing disease-causing mutations, or disrupting endogenous diseasecausing genes, thereby editing the genome. Genome modication possesses the
capacity to eradicate diseases permanently.
Challenges and Considerations
1. Off-target effects: Cas9 can cleave at random locations in the genome.
2. Repair efciency: The repair process does not always result in the desired
alterations.
3. Delivery methods: Efcient distribution of CRISPR components into target cells
might be difcult.
4. Ethical issues: Concerns about germline editing and unexpected consequences.
CRISPR/Cas9 has transformed genetic research and has signicant therapeutic
potential. Researchers are still rening and expanding its capabilities while tackling
obstacles and ethical concerns linked with its use. The eld of research keeps evolving, with CRISPR/Cas systems other than Cas9 being investigated for increased
precision and utility (Zhang etal. 2014).
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
