Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5397_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
15
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
12 Immunoinformatics fortheDiagnosis andMonitoring ofAutoimmune Diseases
https://t.me/med1917
249
diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (Anaya et al. 2016). Studies have identied various human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and various non-HLA genes associated with various autoimmune diseases (Vojdani 2014).
However, autoimmunity cannot be triggered solely by the presence of these genetic markers, highlighting the signicance of environmental variables. The onset and development of autoimmune reactions have been linked to environmental vari­ables, including infections, hormone uctuations, and exposure to specic chemi­cals. For example, molecular mimicry (Fig. 12.1), the process by which viral antigens resemble self-antigens and trigger cross-reactive immune responses, has been used to link viral infections to the onset of type 1 diabetes (Fujinami and Oldstone 1989). Moreover, changes in the makeup of the gut microbiota have been associated with the development of various autoimmune diseases, highlighting the importance of the gut-immune axis in preserving immunological homeostasis (Wu and Wu 2012).
Regulatory T cells (Tregs), a subset of T cells, are crucial in controlling the immune system and keeping it from attacking its own tissues of the body (Sakaguchi etal. 2008). In addition to being generated from naive T cells in the periphery, the thymus, a gland in the chest, also plays a role in Treg production (Sakaguchi etal.
2008; Baecher-Allan 2004).
The ability to remain tolerant and reject self-antigens requires Tregs. Tregs are necessary to prevent the immune system from attacking the body’s own tissues,
Fig. 12.1 Illustration of molecular mimicry
250
https://t.me/med1917
S. Gangwar et al.
which can result in autoimmune illnesses like rheumatoid arthritis (Hirota et al.
2007), multiple sclerosis, and type 1 diabetes (Szanya etal. 2002). Additionally,
Tregs are involved in the suppression of hyperactive immunological reactions to external antigens, including those triggered by infections or allergic reactions (Belkaid etal. 2002). Tissue damage might result from the immune system overre­acting and not having Tregs. Immune tolerance maintenance and the prevention of autoimmune disorders depend on regulatory T cells or Tregs. Additionally, they aid in reducing overreactions of the immune system to foreign antigens. Numerous inammatory and immunological disorders can result from Treg imbalance (Sakaguchi etal. 2008).
Also, in case of infections like tuberculosis and cold sores brought on by herpes­viruses, the immune response does not always result in the total clearance of infec­tions. In vulnerable people, these infections can colonize for an extended period of time. In these circumstances, studies of antigen-specic immune cells show signi­cant distinctions between both naive and effector cells. There are two main ways in which aggressive immune responses are suppressed in these situations. First, cells that are actively combating the infection display an intrinsic shutdown mechanism, which is identied by a rise in the surface expression of co-inhibitory receptors (Table12.1). These receptors send out signals that stop attacking processes like cell death, which stops local tissue damage and elimination of pathogen-infected cells. This balance allows for the tolerance of infected cells while minimizing fur­ther harm.
The second type of regulation occurs extrinsically through the expansion of antigen- specic anti-inammatory cytokines released by these cells to limit immu­nity and promote tissue repair. Tissue antigens activate regulatory cells, which are essential for preserving the homeostasis of the immune system. Mutations causing impairments in these cells can lead to serious autoimmune disorders in humans and animals, highlighting the critical role immune response regulation plays in main­taining general health (Nicholson 2016).
Table 12.1 Co-inhibitory molecules involved in the intrinsic shutdown mechanism of immune response
Receptor family Molecules
CD28 CTLA-4
PD1
TIM Tim-3 CD4+, CD8+ Galectin9 Kassu etal. (2010), Zhu etal.
CD226 TIGIT CD4+, CD8+ CD155, CD112,
CTLA-4 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, PD1 programmed cell death 1, TIGIT T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain
Receptor­expressing cell during infection Ligands References
CD4+ CD4+, CD8+
CD80, CD86 PD-L1, PD-L2
CD113
Kaufmann etal. (2007), Kassu etal. (2010)
(2005), Jones etal. (2008) Kassu etal. (2010), Day etal.
(2006), Palmer etal. (2013), Shimauchi etal. (2007), Yasuma etal. (2016)
12 Immunoinformatics fortheDiagnosis andMonitoring ofAutoimmune Diseases
https://t.me/med1917
251
12.3 Immunoinformatics Fundamentals
The multidisciplinary topic of immunoinformatics combines immunology and bio­informatics to interpret and evaluate the intricate workings of the immune system. Researchers can look at several facets of the immune response, from antigen–anti­body interactions to the identication of immunogenic epitopes, by methodically applying computational and informatics methods.
12.3.1 Computational Analysis ofImmune Receptors
andMolecules
Immunoinformatics allows the analysis of immune receptors, including the highly diverse T-cell receptors (TCRs). TCRs are diverse due to recombination in their respective gene segments, that is, V (variable), D (diversity), and J (joining). This recombination causes diversity in hypervariable complementarity determining region (CDR), which is essential in binding to specic antigens (Davis and Bjorkman
1988). The utilization of sequence alignment algorithms, such as BLAST and
FASTA, facilitates the identication of conserved and variable regions within TCR and BCR (B-cell receptor) sequences, enabling researchers to understand their structural diversity and functional implications.
The immune system’s distinctive ability to identify foreign targets (nonself) without harming the host’s tissues (self) is primarily mediated by T cells. T cells identify their targets through interactions between T-cell receptors (TCRs) and peptide- major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules displayed by antigen­presenting cells (APCs). In the thymus, a broad range of peptide-specic, MHC­restricted TCR repertoires is formed through somatic gene rearrangements. Each of these repertoires is represented by an individual T-cell clone, which undergoes posi­tive and negative selection processes in the thymus. During these processes, T cells are conditioned to recognize self-MHC and to tolerate any self-peptides presented. This results in the development of a naive T-cell repertoire that is self-MHC restricted and equipped to identify foreign peptides encountered in the peripheral tissues (Davis et al. 2007). The prediction of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-binding peptides, essential for antigen presentation, is a critical component of immunoinformatics research. Tools like NetMHC (Andreatta and Nielsen 2016), SYFPEITHI (Class I) (Rammensee et al. 1999), and NetMHCIIpan (Class II) (Jensen etal. 2018) aid in the accurate prediction of peptide-MHC-binding afni­ties, thereby assisting in the designing of peptide-based vaccines and immunothera­pies (Fig.12.2).
252
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 12.2 T-cell development and selection (traditional method) and immunoinformatics-based computational analysis of immune receptor assisting in the design of immunotherapies
S. Gangwar et al.
12.3.2 Epitope Prediction andVaccine Design
A key focus of immunoinformatics is the prediction and characterization of epit­opes. Epitope prediction algorithms, such as ElliPro, leverage sequence and struc­tural data for the prediction of antibody epitopes in protein antigens, facilitating the rational design of vaccines (Ponomarenko etal. 2008).
Rappuoli led reverse vaccinology (RV) in the early 1990s, a genome-centred technique for identifying feasible protein vaccine candidates against Group B meningococcus (MB) (Rappuoli 2000). Finding antigens that mostly reside in the extracellular or outer membrane areas and elicit a humoral antibody response was the main goal at rst. This required a thorough examination of every open reading frame obtained from the MB strain MC58 genome sequence in order to identify proteins that were anticipated to be lipoproteins, secreted, or surface exposed.
The RV technique, which incorporates computerized analysis of pathogenic pro­tein sequences as the rst phase of the process, has transformed vaccine develop­ment. This facilitates the process of choosing a subset of potential vaccine candidates (PVCs), which are promising antigens.
Several computational tools have been developed to predict potential vaccine candidates such as VaxiJen (Doytchinova and Flower 2007), Vaxign (He etal. 2010), NERVE (New Enhanced Reverse Vaccinology Environment) (Vivona etal. 2006), Bowman-Heinson (Bowman etal. 2011), and VacSol (Rizwan etal. 2017).
12 Immunoinformatics fortheDiagnosis andMonitoring ofAutoimmune Diseases
https://t.me/med1917
253
12.3.3 Immune Repertoire Analysis
andHigh-Throughput Sequencing
The most recent developments in high-throughput sequencing technology have transformed the analysis of immune repertoires, enabling the comprehensive prol­ing of T- and B-cell receptor repertoires at unprecedented depth and scale. Immunoinformatics pipelines, such as TraCeR (Stubbington etal. 2016), V’DJer software (Mose etal. 2016), and MiXCR (Bolotin et al. 2015), facilitate the pro­cessing and analysis of large-scale immune repertoire sequencing data, providing insights into clonal diversity, somatic hypermutation, and immune response dynam­ics (Bolotin etal. 2017).
Deep learning (DL) and bioinformatics are being introduced into the eld of immunology while TCR repertoire sequencing technology is progressing. This is mostly due to the fact that a single person’s repertoire data typically consist of numerous sequences. Machine learning (ML) is a useful technique for deriving sig­nicant insights from large data sets. It is now essential for repertoire sequencing analysis. Additionally, ML has made it easier to create a new repertoire of sequencing- based applications, such as the production of tailored cancer vaccines (also known as neoantigen vaccines) (Ott etal. 2017) and fresh approaches to diag­nosing infections such as COVID-19 (Gittelman etal. 2022). Beyond their use in medicine, machine-learning-based analysis techniques are advancing basic science in the area. The application of machine learning (ML) to repertoire sequencing is expanding quickly (Katayama etal. 2022).
12.4 Immunoinformatics inAutoimmune Disease Diagnosis
The complicated and diverse nature of autoimmune disorders makes diagnosing these conditions extremely difcult. Conventional diagnostic techniques frequently depend on the identication of autoantibodies and clinical signs, which does not offer enough specicity and sensitivity to reliably classify diseases. By enabling the iden­tication of disease-specic biomarkers and the development of cutting-edge diag­nostic tools, immunoinformatics, i.e., an emerging interdisciplinary eld that integrates immunology, bioinformatics, and computational biology, has the potential to transform the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. Researchers can look at several aspects of the immune response, from antigen–antibody interactions to the identica­tion of immunogenic epitopes, by applying computational and informatics methods.
12.4.1 Identication ofBiomarkers
The identication and validation of novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of autoim­mune diseases are greatly aided by immunoinformatics. Researchers can uncover potential biomolecular signatures linked with particular autoimmune disorders by
254
https://t.me/med1917
analysing high-dimensional omics data, such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and genomes, using computational algorithms and data mining techniques. As an exam­ple, integrated analysis of gene expression proles and protein–protein interaction networks in the context of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has resulted in the identica­tion of candidate biomarkers with high diagnostic and prognostic value (Song etal. 2023).
In clinical practice, biomarkers are essential, and nding biomarkers can be sped up by applying immunoinformatics to data about proteins and the immune system. Previous investigations have identied autoantibodies as serum biomarkers for sys­temic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (Zhu etal. 2015; Huang etal. 2012); however, the entire pattern information required for diagnosis is absent from the preliminary evaluation tests. In order to solve this, a novel method was created that precisely distinguishes SLE patients using the k-nearest neighbour (kNN) algorithm, allow­ing them to obtain timely and reliable diagnoses (Binder etal. 2005).
S. Gangwar et al.
12.4.2 Peptide Microarray-Based Diagnostics
Peptide microarray technology powered by immunoinformatics has become a via­ble method for multiplexed autoantibody detection against certain peptide epitopes linked to autoimmune disorders. Researchers can nd autoantibody signatures that differentiate between various autoimmune disorders by synthesizing vast libraries of disease-relevant peptides and applying high-throughput screening techniques. In the case of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), researchers analysed gene expression data and identied several key genes associated with immune response and inamma­tory signalling pathways using microarray data sets. Notably, they highlighted the diagnostic signicance of specic genes such as CCR5, CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, PNOC, TLR8, and CD52in RA.The study also emphasized the critical role of the chemokine system in mediating leukocyte migration and the potential implications of genes like TLR8 and CD52in the immune response and inamma­tion in RA. Overall, the researchers aimed to uncover potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets to advance the treatment of RA (Ren etal. 2020).
12.4.3 Computational Model Integrating Immunoinformatics
withImaging Techniques
In the medical eld, radiomics includes the extraction of valuable information from radiographic images such as CT (computed tomography), MR (magnetic reso­nance), and PET (positron emission tomography) scans, along with machine­learning- based quantication of lesion areas and important immunologic data (Uribe etal. 2019). This procedure aids in disease diagnosis, categorization, and grading (van Helden etal. 2018; Lambin etal. 2012). When it comes to predicting
12 Immunoinformatics fortheDiagnosis andMonitoring ofAutoimmune Diseases
https://t.me/med1917
treatment response, radiomic characteristics from PET imaging work better than more conventional metrics like tumour diameter, volume, and metastases. By lower­ing picture noise and obtaining more precise radiation characteristics, deep learning applied to PET image reconstruction and post-processing of traditionally recovered images along with immunologic data can improve the quality of PET images. However, the low occurrence of certain diseases leads to difculties in differentiat­ing between affected and unaffected lesion areas in PET scans (Mayerhoefer etal. 2020).
255
12.5 Immunoinformatics forDisease Monitoring
In several pathological situations, such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, and infec­tious diseases, disease monitoring is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment, the course of the disease, and the likelihood of reappearance. The multi­disciplinary discipline of immunoinformatics, which combines computational biol­ogy, bioinformatics, and immunology, provides cutting-edge methods and instruments for the methodical study and tracking of immune responses in both health and illness.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a multifaceted condition shaped by the interactions of environmental and genetic elements, leading to disruptions in immune function. The prevailing theory regarding its pathogenesis suggests that T-lymphocytes, which are auto-reactive and activated in the periphery, especially those displaying Th1 and Th17 phenotypes, inltrate the central nervous system (CNS) by exploiting a compromised blood–brain barrier (BBB) (Yadav etal. 2015). Once within the brain, these auto-reactive immune cells recruit macrophages, microglia, and B lym­phocytes to promote inammation, leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and inammatory cytokines, which cause trauma to tissues (Dendrou etal. 2015).
Immunomodulating or immunosuppressive therapies are the basis of MS treat­ment. Over the last two decades, a number of monoclonal antibodies and oral medi­cations have changed the therapeutic landscape signicantly. Thirteen active ingredients are present in the approximately 20 medications that have been licensed for as therapeutic of multiple sclerosis (MS), as dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer ace­tate, and interferon 1 beta are marketed under different brand names.
The vision of early therapeutic intervention has gained popularity in the MS community in recent years since there is mounting evidence that brain damage starts as soon as the disease manifests and continues throughout the course of the illness, even in clinically silent phases (Trapp etal. 1998; Filippi etal. 2004; Knier etal.
2016). Studies conducted over an extended period of time show that patients with
earlier treatment outcomes saw reduced rates of relapse, disability accumulation, and loss of brain volume (Ziemssen etal. 2015). There are rst-line medications with varying modes of action, but it is still difcult to predict individual reactions, and no laboratory examination has been proven to be a good indicator of drug
256
https://t.me/med1917
responsiveness or treatment failure in multiple sclerosis. Consequently, there is a continuous search for fresh and trustworthy instruments to inform therapy choices. Although tailored techniques seem promising, their current deployment in clinical practice is limited due to the large number of variables that need to be taken into account (Pennisi etal. 2013). In order to tackle this issue, a number of computer models have been put out to depict the dynamics of multiple sclerosis (MS), particu­larly the relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) kind. These models are intended to pro­vide customized simulations when particular medications are administered.
Researchers developed a simulation framework capable of predicting the dynam­ics of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients undergoing specic drug treatments. The goal of the study was to use a mechanistic model to predict treat­ment outcomes for individual MS patients by performing a thorough investigation of the immune system’s behaviour. A number of rst-line medications, such as teri­unomide, ngolimod, and IFN-β1a, as well as several second-line medications, such as natalizumab and ocrelizumab, were included in the drug analysis. Customized simulations were made possible by the simulation framework, which offered multiple ways to mimic an actual patient in a virtual environment. The simu­lation in a patient was able to replicate several immunological repertoires, which is essential for all simulations involving the dynamics of the immune system (Pappalardo etal. 2020).
S. Gangwar et al.
12.6 Case Studies andApplication
12.6.1 Immunoinformatics Association ofHuman
Coronaviruses andAutoimmunity
Researchers explained the importance of conserved epitopes found in many corona­viruses and how they could affect immune response modulation and possibly even trigger autoimmunity (Mathew etal. 2022). After applying bioinformatics screen­ing to 351 whole human coronavirus genome sequences, 108 conserved areas were found. Out of them, 16 were B-cell immunogenic epitopes and 19 were T-cell immunogenic epitopes that may have an association with autoimmunity and cross-reactivity.
Interestingly, these epitopes were detected in structural and non-structural pro­teins of SARS-CoV-2in addition to the spike protein. The presence of B-cell epit­opes across a range of viral proteins suggests a complex immune response to the virus. Furthermore, the potential impact of pre-existing immunity to other viruses on the immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 is intriguing. Some of the identi­ed B-cell epitopes exhibit potential cross-reactivity with other viruses, such as human herpesvirus 4 and H1N1. This cross-reactivity could play a role in shaping the overall immune response and has implications for understanding the broader dynamics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
Additionally, the study demonstrated the similarity between human proteins and some of the discovered B-cell epitopes, raising the possibility that molecular
12 Immunoinformatics fortheDiagnosis andMonitoring ofAutoimmune Diseases
https://t.me/med1917
mimicry is a crucial factor in the autoimmune diseases observed in COVID-19 patients (Marino Gammazza etal. 2020). According to a number of studies, there may be a cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and the sections of the human pro­teome. This suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may cause cross-reactivity with the host’s self- antigens, which could result in a range of clinical symptoms and autoimmune disorders (Venkatakrishnan etal. 2020; Kanduc 2020).
The analysis of T-cell-mediated immune response revealed that some of the con­served T-cell epitopes of SARS-CoV matched T-cell epitopes in response to other viruses. This emphasizes that prior exposure to other viruses may inuence the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and that there may be cross-reactivity among coronaviruses (Grifoni etal. 2020; Braun etal. 2020). Additionally, the research demonstrated that a sizable percentage of the discovered SARS-CoV-2 peptides bound to HLA class I molecules, possibly triggering CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses (Anderson etal. 2021). This result suggested that COVID-19 and HLA types linked to autoimmune disorders and hyper-inammatory states may be related. Most of the conserved B- and T-cell epitopes were found within the functional domains of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins, notably close to the spike protein’s receptor­binding region, according to additional structural analysis. This emphasizes how these epitopes may cause protective antibodies to be produced, which could prevent or cause an allosteric effect on ACE2 binding, so affecting the infectiousness of the virus (Galeotti and Bayry 2020). The study’s authors stressed the need for more research, especially experimental studies to evaluate functional antibodies and the immunogenic effect invivo, even though the results they reported were based on immunoinformatic predictions. The research contributed to the renement of knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and potential consequences by illuminating the intricate relation between viral epitopes and the immune system.
257
12.6.2 Inferring Microorganisms Associated withRheumatoid
Arthritis (RA)
In order to understand how human-associated microorganisms may cause rheuma­toid arthritis (RA) through a process known as molecular mimicry, a study has been conducted using an immunoinformatics investigation (Repac etal. 2021). The nd­ings offer insight into a variety of species that may contribute to the initiation of the disease process by activating autoreactive T cells specic to RA. Notably, the research highlights the critical role of autoreactive T cells in the disease’s inception, even while B cells contribute to RA pathogenesis in later stages (van Hamburg and Tas 2018; Chemin etal. 2019; Rashid etal. 2017).
Numerous potential RA-triggering organisms were found in the study, including commensal species, opportunistic pathogens, and well-known pathogens including P. mirabilis (Rashid and Ebringer 2007) and M. tuberculosis (Lan and Wu 1992). It implies that components of the human microbiome may play a direct role in the pathophysiology of RA, maybe going beyond the scope of their traditional roles in inammation. Remarkably, certain components of the gut and oral microbiota,
258
https://t.me/med1917
including B. fragilis and several strains of Prevotella, were found to be putative trig- gers (Scher and Abramson 2011). This is consistent with recent research that associ­ates RA with disturbed gut and oral microbiota. The investigation also brought to light the signicant potential of fungi, which are frequently disregarded as possible initiators of the onset of RA.A number of new fungal diseases were suggested by the study as potential RA triggers because of their closer evolutionary relationship with humans and their capacity for molecular mimicry since they share homologous peptides with human proteins. The investigation found putative T-cell epitopes across many viral groups, including the Marseillevirus group, indicating their potential signicance in inducing autoimmune reactions, even though the results were less clear-cut for viruses (Colson and Raoult 2010).
Strict ltering guidelines were used in the study to guarantee the validity of the results, taking into account the 80% sequence identity cut-off and the lack of align­ment gaps. Despite these drawbacks, the work provides insightful information about the contribution of fungi to autoimmunity as well as the possible direct involvement of bacterial commensals in the pathophysiology of RA.It also emphasizes the need to identify strong autoantigens, which are essential to comprehend a range of auto­immune diseases (Repac etal. 2021).
S. Gangwar et al.
12.7 Future Directions andChallenges
Through computational models and informatics tools, immunoinformatics, a rap­idly developing eld, plays a critical role in furthering research in the eld of immu­nology (Tong and Ren 2009). Numerous obstacles and diverse paths become apparent as we investigate its present patterns and potential future developments.
12.7.1 Future Directions
Enhanced Epitope Prediction
Immunoinformatics will likely focus on rening epitope prediction methods by uti­lizing advancements in articial intelligence and machine learning. This could lead to more accurate predictions of immunogenic epitopes (Alkaff etal. 2020).
Personalized Immunotherapy
Immunoinformatics may aid in the development of individualized immunothera­pies, which adjust treatments to individuals’ immunological proles. This has the potential to transform disease management and improve therapy results (Oli etal. 2020).