Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3803_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
Chapter 10
https://t.me/medicina_free
Preserving Vessel Integrity andReducing Vascular Recoil withFocal Force Balloons
EfeK.Lambrinos, EdwardD.Tubberville, VinayakSubramanian, andGeorgeL.Adams
Introduction
Percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) has been the trailblazer in the management of vas­cular disease for many years. More innovative tools have been created to treat vari­ous types of arterial lesions as the understanding of peripheral arterial disease has advanced. Scoring balloons and focal force balloon technologies have become an essential part of the interventionalist’s equipment. The “leave nothing behind” strat­egy has gained traction over the years due to the prevalence of in-stent restenosis and vessel recoil following peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). This method intends to diminish the development of permanent vascular prosthesis, which can likely allow for future restenosis [1, 2]. Furthermore, recent developments in drug technology have allowed for even more strides in the individualization of patient care. In the following chapter, we will review the techniques utilizing focal force and scoring balloons for vessel preparation and further evaluate the literature for the use of such devices.
E. K. Lambrinos · E. D. Tubberville Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Raleigh, NC, USA e-mail: e_lambrinos1012@email.campbell.edu; edtubbervill0919@email.campbell.edu
V. Subramanian Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA e-mail: Vinayak.subramanian@utsouthwestern.edu
G. L. Adams (*) UNC -Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA e-mail: george.adams@unchealth.unc.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 N. W. Shammas (ed.), Peripheral Arterial Interventions, Contemporary Cardiology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09741-6_10
195
196
https://t.me/medicina_free
The idea of vessel preparation has become mainstreamed among endovascular specialists specically aiming to treat patients with infrainguinal arterial disease [3,
4]. Focal force balloons are used mainly for two vessel preparatory purposes, the
rst one being to decrease vessel elastic recoil [5] and the second, to reduce the risk of perforation and/or dissection [6].
The acknowledgement of the role of plaque characteristics can aid in differenti­ating between which device is most appropriate for preparing the vessel. Plaque characteristics span a vast range of features, from including calcic, heterogenous, and homogenous plaque [7]. Homogenous plaque is linked with thrombus develop­ment, typically seen in chronic total occlusions (CTO) and acute occlusions, and also contains brocalcic or broelastic matter which is often seen in lesions of chronic stenosis [8, 9]. In contrast, heterogenous plaque is associated with an increased amount of calcication and cerebrovascular symptoms along with a pre­dominance in carotid artery stenosis when compared to homogenous plaque [10,
11]. Calcied plaque is made of predominantly calcic deposits with a large variety
in presentation and is typically observed as deposits within intimal and medial layer of the vessel [12]; they are mostly found in diabetic patients or those with chronic renal insufciency and are commonly found in the blood vessels inferior to the knee. The evaluation of the various plaque characteristics can be performed by con­sidering the patient risk factors, the angiographic pattern, and the intraprocedural intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) which allows the angiologist to personalize care improving outcomes and reducing complications.
E. K. Lambrinos et al.
Functionalities ofBalloon Angioplasty andFocal Force Balloons
The functionalities of balloon angioplasty are intricate and can be found in other literature. In summary, a radial circumferential force is administered on the walls of the individual vessel following the distention of the balloon, thereby causing the size of the lumen to increase.
The greatest force from the balloon is focused primarily on the disease-free por­tions of the artery. A large force is also focused on the area between the disease-free portions and the plaque causing the stenosis [13], followed by an elastic recoil that presents whenever these over-expanded portions are returned to their normal size. A potential poor outcome involves an arterial wall dissection that may occur when the stress produced by the PTA is distributed through a fragile portion of either the plaque or the vessel itself and is spread down the vessel. In the worst-case scenario, this stress can produce an arterial perforation.
The purpose of the scoring balloons and focal force is to allow for a progressive expansion of the vessel by focusing the pressure strictly on the plaque as opposed to the vessel. A number of different designs have been manufactured to utilize this strategy (Table10.1).
10 Preserving Vessel Integrity andReducing Vascular Recoil withFocal Force Balloons
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 10.1 Summary of focal force balloon types and sizes
Focal force balloons Device name Size range
Peripheral cutting balloon 5–8mm diameter, 15–20mm lengths Chocolate balloon 2.5–6mm diameter, 40–120mm lengths Angiosculpt 2–8mm diameter, 10–40mm lengths VascuTrack 2.0–7.0mm diameter, 20–300mm lengths FLEX scoring catheter Variable diameter, 40–120cm working length
Fig. 10.1 Peripheral Cutting Balloon device by Boston Scientic
Peripheral Cutting Balloon (Boston Scientic) (Fig.10.1)
197
Device Mechanism
The peripheral cutting balloons are standard balloons that include four blades of microsurgical precision found along the balloon surface, whose function is to make distinct longitudinal cuts within the plaque. Initially, ination of the balloon occurs to a pressure of 2atm to set the blades into position, which are then followed by an ination to nominal pressures of 6atm once in contact with the plaque in order to cut into the plaque.
Specications
There are two accessible forms of the peripheral cutting balloon: a monorail rapid exchange (RX) catheter system and an over the wire (OTW). The two balloon lengths that are currently marketed are 15 and 20mm, with available balloon diam­eters that span from 5.0 to 8.0mm. Catheter lengths range from 50 to 137cm (OTW) and 142cm (RX).
198
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. K. Lambrinos et al.
Evidence andUse
Current evidence pertaining to the complexity of cutting balloons (CB) is limited. RESCUT, the largest randomized controlled trial, analyzed the use of cutting bal­loons in the coronary arteries for in-stent restenosis [14]. The conclusion of this study stated that the occurrence of in-stent restenosis did not decrease with the use of cutting balloon angioplasty. However, it did in fact decrease the quantity of bal­loons that were required for each intervention and pointed toward a decrease in a need for the use of stenting. Within the femoropopliteal arteries, studies have indi­cated safety in the treatment of these lesions. The use of cutting balloons in contrast to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in small (dened as <5cm) focal femoro­popliteal lesions was analyzed in a randomized controlled trial [15, 16]. The study concluded that POBA was superior to cutting balloon angioplasty and that cutting balloon angioplasty, at 6months, has greater rates of restenosis. Furthermore, PTA use was weighed against CB-PTA use in a prospective study involving 83 patients with femoropopliteal lesions of short calcied occlusive nature (<3cm). This study concluded that elastic recoil, arterial perforations, and dissections requiring stenting were not experienced by lesions treated with CB-PTA, along with rates of both pri­mary and secondary patency improving with the use of cutting balloon angio­plasty [17].
There is inadequate proof that supports the use of CB as the rst-line treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. An appreciation of plaque characteristics can allow for better understanding of the use of this device. Additionally, the CB may be used for hemodialysis stula site lesions, but further analysis shows that the CB has primar­ily been used and studied only within the treatment of in-stent stenosis and femoro­popliteal stenosis, although the use of these balloons to treat these issues may be considered an off-label use for this equipment. Care should be taken when station­ing this balloon during the treatment of in-stent restenosis due to the possibility of fracturing the stent from the microsurgical blades.
Chocolate PTA Balloon (Medtronic) (Fig.10.2)
Device Mechanism
The Chocolate PTA balloon incorporates a semi-compliant balloon surrounded by a cage made of nitinol. Enlargement of the balloon allows for the balloon to expand through the open spaces of the cage. At the locations where the balloon does not expand, on the frame of the cage, it creates a network that places increased forces on the plaque which gives rise to limited breaks within the plaque. The capacity to focus the force from the balloon onto a smaller location allows for angioplasty to be performed under lower pressures with lower rates of ow-limiting dissection.
10 Preserving Vessel Integrity andReducing Vascular Recoil withFocal Force Balloons
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 10.2 CHOCOLATE PTA device by Medtronic
Device Specications
199
The Chocolate balloon can be currently found in diameters of 2.5–6.0mm and with balloon lengths of 40–120mm and a working length of 120–150cm. Compatibility with a 0.014″ and 0.018″ guidewire is possible with its over-the-wire design. Another version, with paclitaxel coating, is available and being assessed for effec­tiveness and safety in the USA.
Evidence andUse
The majority of evidence for the use of the Chocolate balloon can be found in the Chocolate BAR registry, a prospective multicenter study used to examine the Chocolate balloon when treating patients with peripheral artery disease [18]. The study consisted of 262 patients totaling 290 femoropopliteal lesions with most of the patients having moderate to severe peripheral artery disease (PAD, including Rutherford 3–6). The average length of each lesion among those evaluated in the study was 83.5mm, and 63.5% had calcic disease. In 85.1% of the cases, success in the procedure was attained, with the dissection rate at 22.6%. Additionally, no ow-limiting dissections were noted. Only 1.6% of cases necessitated bail-out stenting. A drug-coated adaptation of the Chocolate balloon is being assessed for effectiveness and safety.
200
https://t.me/medicina_free
The FDA has indicated that the Chocolate balloon may be used for the treatment of peripheral vasculature lesions, including those of the iliac and infrainguinal arter­ies. The balloon is specically appropriate for heterogenous calcic plaque and lesions of in-stent restenosis. Furthermore, the device is appropriate for lesions that are located near bifurcations due to the plaque not typically shifting when the inated balloon is in contact, in contrast to when used in conventional angioplasty.
E. K. Lambrinos et al.
AngioSculpt Balloon (Philips) (Fig.10.3)
Device Mechanism
The device includes two helical nitinol struts (scoring elements) that surround a semi-compliant balloon. Upon ination of the balloon, the helical struts pierce the plaque on direct contact and limit the balloon force onto these struts. This method allows for angioplasty to occur at lower pressures of ination and overall decreases the risks involved with dissections of uncontrolled nature. Originally, the device was created to treat coronary lesions but has more recently been utilized for the treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Device Specications
The AngioSculpt balloon can be currently found in diameters of 2.0–8.0mm and with balloon lengths of 10–40 mm, with a working length of 90–155 cm. Compatibility is with a 0.014 and 0.018 guidewire along with 5–6F sheaths.
Evidence andUse
A multicenter prospective study researched the technique of the AngioSculpt bal­loon for the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. The study included 42 patients (with a total of 56 lesions). Most patients had a severe case of PAD, with Rutherford class ≥4 (90.5%). A total of 73% of lesions that were treated had moderate to severe
Fig. 10.3 Agniosculpt PTA device by Phillips
10 Preserving Vessel Integrity andReducing Vascular Recoil withFocal Force Balloons
https://t.me/medicina_free
calcic disease with an average lesion length of 33.9±42.2mm. Procedural success was achieved in 98.2% of all cases. Dissections that occurred following the angio­plasty were present in 10.7% of lesions [19]. Another prospective study evaluated 31 patients (with a total of 36 lesions) with severe infrapopliteal disease to gauge the effectiveness and safety of the device, with its successful use in all cases. A rate of
35.5% was evaluated for the stenting rate performed after device use due to a dis­section of sub-optimal therapy. The survival rate after 1month without complica­tions was 96.8%, and the primary patency after 1year was 61% [20].
The AngioSculpt may be used for lesion dilation in peripheral vasculature— more specically the femoropopliteal, iliac, and infrapopliteal arteries.
201
VascuTrak (Bard) (Fig.10.4)
Device Mechanism
The device includes two wires attached to a semi-compliant balloon. After the bal­loon expands, the stress from the balloon is transferred through the wires to produce contained breaks within the plaque. This equipment has not been studied systemati­cally but is similar in action to other focal force balloons.
Specications
The VascuTrak can be found with diameter of 2–7mm and with balloon lengths of 20–300mm. The working length ranges from 80 to 140cm and is compatible with a guidewire of 0.014 and 0.018.
Fig. 10.4 VascuTrack Device by BARD
202
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. K. Lambrinos et al.
Evidence andUse
There is little evidence assessing the use of the VascuTrak balloon. Indications for use of the VascuTrak include treatment of peripheral vessel lesions. The device may also be used to treat brocalcic disease. The device’s simplistic design allows for a vast selection of balloon lengths and sizes. Traditionally, a second wire was used alongside an inated balloon to attain the same result in most coronary interventions.
Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) (Shockwave) (Fig.10.5)
Device Mechanism
Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) comprises of a traditional angioplasty balloon mounted with ultrasound emitters capable of emitting pulsatile ultrasound waves which mechanically modify the hard, typically calcic, plaque in the lesion without damaging the elastic components of the healthy artery. The balloon is rst inserted into the occluded artery and inated to a pressure of 4atm, and 30 shock­wave impulses followed by 60 more are delivered after dilation to nominal pressure has been achieved. The impulses function to break the calcied lesions into small particles while preserving vessel integrity.
Specications
The Shockwave IVL device is available in two congurations: the Shockwave M5 used for treating peripheral arteries above the knee and the Shockwave S4 used to target arteries below the knee (BTK). The M5 series ranges from 3.5 to 7.0mm in
Fig. 10.5 Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy by Shockwave Medical
10 Preserving Vessel Integrity andReducing Vascular Recoil withFocal Force Balloons
https://t.me/medicina_free
diameter, has a length of 60mm and a working length of 110cm, and can deliver up to 300 pulses maximally. The S4 series ranges from 2.5 to 4.0mm in diameter, is 40mm in length, has a 135cm working length, and can deliver up to 160 maximum impulses.
203
Evidence andUse
Research on the use of Shockwave IVL has shown its effectiveness in treating lesioned vessels resulting in better outcomes compared to traditional PTA. In a study conducted by Marianne etal., 35 individuals presented with femoropopliteal lesions that were on average 76.3% stenotic with an average lesion length of
61.5mm [21]. These lesions were heavily calcied in 64.1% of the patients with an average calcied lesion length of 80.3mm. The study concluded with all patients having procedural success with an average residual stenosis of 23.4% and a 2.9mm acute gain. There were no implanted stents or vascular complications during the procedure. The patients also showed 100% vessel patency as dened as <50% reste­nosis and 100% freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at a 30-day follow-up and 82.1% patency and 100% freedom from TLR at a 6-month follow-up.
Further studies demonstrated the increased efcacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) compared to traditional PTA [22, 23]. The largest randomized clinical trial of IVL vs. PTA demonstrated that IVL was superior in most aspects. IVL demon­strated higher procedural success by 15.5%, higher lesions with residual stenosis <30% by 14.5%, fewer ow-limiting dissections by 5.4%, fewer post-dilatations by
14.8%, and fewer stent placements by 13.7%. The main shortcoming of IVL was that it was on par with PTA in TLR and major adverse events, although minimal in both techniques.
Although IVL has had more extensive research in above-the-knee vessels, fur­ther evidence is still being collected for use in BTK treatment. Currently, there is 1 available study, conducted on a cohort of 20 patients with 100% calcication in BTK vessels that resulted in 100% success in residual stenosis being <50% at 30days [24]. Overall, IVL is useful in a multitude of scenarios including where stenting is contraindicated and in high-risk locations such as bifurcating lesions.
FLEX Scoring Catheter (VentureMed) (Fig.10.6)
Device Mechanism
The FLEX scoring catheter functions by preparing the lesion for balloon angio­plasty by way of three microblades attached to three exible struts located along the end of the catheter. FLEX focuses on improving vessel compliance, leading to lower balloon pressures, leading to less vessel trauma. The catheter is mounted on a
204
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 10.6 Flex Scoring Catheter by Venturemed
guidewire, and the section with three microblades is directed to the distal end of the lesion. The operator can then engage the scoring elements of the catheter and pull retrograde across the lesions within vessel. The unique aspect of the FLEX catheter is that it will maintain 1atm of pressure on the blades as the operator pulls the cath­eter retrograde through the vessel. This dynamic scoring technology allows for pre­cise parallel cuts along the treated vessel segment. Once proximal to the lesion, the catheter blades can be disengaged, sent distal to the lesion, and rotated 30° or 90°, and the process repeated for maximal plaque modication.
E. K. Lambrinos et al.
Specications
The FLEX catheter comes in one design. It is 6F compatible and can be used with both 0.014″ and 0.018″ guidewire platforms and has working lengths of 40 or 120cm.
Evidence andUse
Studies using the FLEX scoring catheter have produced evidence supporting the use in vessel preparation prior to angioplasty. In particular, the International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy in 2018 referenced compiled data from mul­tiple hospitals and operators on the FLEX catheter prior to angioplasty [25]. From the symposium, the study titled “Early Clinical Results Using the FLEX Scoring Catheter in 100 Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusions” showed that of 100