Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3803_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
82
https://t.me/medicina_free
lipid- rich cells, apoptotic macrophages, amorphous debris and matrix bre rem­nants [9]. That cap may thicken and calcify the intima over time creating the appearance of plaque calcication during procedural imaging [10]. Concurrently, the necrotic core may enlarge causing luminal reduction and stenosis. Advanced plaque expansion which involves a signicant proportion of the blood vessel cir­cumference and the associated calcication is known to reduce elasticity and compliance [11].
Calcication of the media layer occurs with ageing and is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes mellitus [12, 13]. It is independent of athero­sclerosis, despite the two processes commonly occurring together as they have simi­lar risk factors [14]. The process begins when hydroxyapatite crystals are deposited on to degraded elastin bres inciting an osteoblast-like differentiation of the adja­cent vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) [15]. This VSMC differentiation is also observed as part of normal ageing and the increased oxidative stress which may occur with CKD, smoking and diabetes [16].
It is common for atherosclerotic plaque stenosis to require angioplasty revascu­larisation in the context of coexisting blood vessel wall calcication and reduced compliance. Dissection is a frequent complication, with the potential to limit the durability of that procedure.
A. Stathis et al.
Barotrauma andtheImmediate Cellular Response toAngioplasty
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) uses high-pressure expansion to dilate the stenotic plaque and achieve luminal gain. During ination, the intima, media and adventitia are mechanically stretched by the outward force exerted from the balloon [17, 18]. With low-pressure ination, the inherent elastic properties of the blood vessel (compliance) allow it to return to the original luminal diameter when the balloon deates [18, 19]. However, with high pressure and increased stretch, the elastic properties of the artery are overcome, cleaving the intima and often media [19, 20]. These disrupted layers of blood vessel wall heal and remodel, ultimately facilitating an increased luminal diameter which restores blood supply to the extremity [18, 20].
It is important for angioplasty to disrupt the atherosclerotic plaque and the elastic properties of the inner layers of arterial wall if it is to result in permanent remodeling [18, 21]. This involves a physical trauma at the plaque-artery inter­face, stretching and tearing of the endothelium and alteration of the blood vessel substructure [20]. With that angioplasty-induced barotrauma come denudation of the endothelium and the immediate release of thrombogenic and vasoactive factors which promote platelet aggregation, thrombus formation and inamma­tion [22, 23]. Damage at the media level results in the necrosis of VSMC and matrix bres, macrophage activation and release of cytokines and growth factors
5 Blood Vessel Compliance, Barotrauma and Angioplasty-Induced Dissection…
https://t.me/medicina_free
[23]. This triggers a cascade response which ultimately results in the migration of VSMC from the media to intima, where they proliferate, undergo metaplasia and produce additional extracellular matrix [23, 24]. This process, and the cel­lular/matrix lesion which results, is called neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). In its early stages, it is considered a healthy response which facilitates blood vessel healing.
83
Mid-Term Cellular Response andRemodeling
Vascular remodeling can be described as negative (luminal reduction) or positive (luminal enlargement) [25, 26] and under normal conditions relies on an intact endothelium. Glagov etal. were the rst to demonstrate that human coronary arter­ies undergo compensatory positive remodeling in response to decreased blood ow [26], with the same mechanism now also described in peripheral vessels [27]. However, angioplasty trauma mediated through cytokine and chemokine release may also lead to tissue remodeling and structural change. Normally, the intact endo­thelial layer inhibits platelet aggregation; however, angioplasty-induced barotrauma damages and denudes that inner layer of cells with an immediate release of throm­bogenic and vasoactive factors that promote platelet aggregation and localised inammation [23]. The degranulation of platelets releases chemokines and cyto­kines that lead to the migration and proliferation of VSMC located in the media. Furthermore, if the angioplasty trauma leads to stretching and tearing of the media, it may result inlocalised VSMC necrosis and release of additional growth factors. Together, these trigger a complex interaction between VSMC, platelets, endothelial cells, leukocytes and cellular mediators that culminate in remodeling and formation of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) [24]. The mitogenic substances released by the degranulating platelet plug, together with those by the damaged media, result in the migration of VSMC from the media to intima. A signicant proportion of those migratory VSMC proliferate and form new extracellular matrix (ECM) within the neointima [28]. If over- exuberant, NIH can lead to a pathophysiological compro­mise of the lumen, a description synonymous with negative remodeling which may lead to restenosis and the return of ischemic symptoms.
In addition to migration and proliferation of VSMC, there is evidence to suggest the barotrauma from angioplasty results in permanent functional change of the endothelium. It is known that regions of chronic denudation feature a layer of bro­nectin, which can prevent the regrowth of endothelial cells [24, 29]. The increased production of the extracellular matrix protein bronectin is driven by the release of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF- β1) from aggregated platelets [24, 29–31]. This process highlights the impact of the ECM on endothelial recovery following balloon angioplasty. In regions where the endothelium has recovered, the presence of actin stress laments within them suggests that those overlying the NIH are oper­ating in an altered functional state [32].
84
A1
B1
Intima Media Calcified plaqueAdventitia
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Stathis et al.
The Concept ofControlled Versus Uncontrolled Dissection
The goal of PTA is to create a series of small, controlled, blood vessel wall dissec­tions that facilitate permanent luminal gain by enabling radial expansion [18] while avoiding large, ow-limiting dissections that might result in acute occlusion or lead to restenosis (Fig.5.1) [19]. Histopathology studies demonstrate that microdissec­tion and arterial wall disruption occur to some degree after every angioplasty [17,
33, 34]. However, there are aspects of the individual disease and procedural tech-
nique that can help predict the likelihood of uncontrolled dissection which may have detrimental clinical consequences. The nature of the atherosclerotic plaque may inuence the angioplasty result and type of dissection observed. Calcied lesions are less compliant and more susceptible to dissection, even at lower force [20, 35]. Circumferential plaque is thought to evenly distribute the forces of angio­plasty, resulting in small fractures and dissections at the thinner portions of the plaque [17, 20, 35], whereas eccentric lesions are more likely to dissect entirely from the blood vessel wall and at the margin of plaque and the normal underlying media [22]. Angioplasty of calcied vessels may result in cleavage of the plaque, putting the underlying vessel under high stress and increasing the risk of signicant intimal dissection [20]. Moreover, sections of non-compliant artery may dispropor­tionately transfer the angioplasty force in a proximal and distal direction causing stretch and increasing the risk of uncontrolled dissection in those adjacent zones [20, 35]. Angioplasty techniques used during treatment may also play a role.
A2 A3
B2 B3
Fig. 5.1 Controlled and uncontrolled dissection. Controlled dissection induced by balloon angio­plasty (A1–A3). A2 demonstrates the microdissections which result from balloon ination (black arrows) and A3 the nal result with circumferential dilatation of the luminal area (A3). Uncontrolled dissection (B1–B3) with calcied plaque in the intimal layer (grey shaded area), balloon ination transfers shearing force to the plaque edge (B2, white arrows) leading to uncontrolled macrodis­section which may have negative clinical consequences (B3, white arrows)
5 Blood Vessel Compliance, Barotrauma and Angioplasty-Induced Dissection…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Subintimal wire passage prior to balloon ination and the use of adjunctive atherec­tomy are two procedural aspects known to increase the risk of dissection [36], whereas prolonged angioplasty ination times and the use of long (versus multiple short) balloon lengths are known to reduce it [37–39].
85
Stents forMechanical Support
Nitinol self-expanding bare metal stents were developed to overcome some of the limitations observed with PTA.By providing mechanical scaffolding, they stabilise the treated blood vessel segment and overcome elastic recoil by exerting ongoing force on the vessel wall. However, that same chronic outward force results in a chronic low-grade vascular injury which can lead to the development of NIH depos­ited between the stent interstices. This NIH may also limit the durability of any stent-based intervention. A next generation of nitinol stents coated in antiprolifera­tive drugs such as paclitaxel have been developed to limit the NIH response and reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis. They have been shown to be superior to PTA and bare metal stents in multiple randomised trials [40, 41].
Modes ofFailure Following Balloon Angioplasty
As described, angioplasty-induced barotrauma leads to a cellular response, and the blood vessel remodeling which follows can result in acute or delayed target lesion restenosis/failure. Uncontrolled macrodissection can also lead to poor clinical out­comes. Those may also occur in the acute setting within 24h of PTA or take the form of a recurrent stenosis weeks or months after the index procedure.
Acute Occlusion
Acute occlusion occurs during or immediately after (<24h) an angioplasty proce­dure. It is caused by mechanical obstruction which may result from any combina­tion of occlusive dissection, thrombus formation, intraplaque haemorrhage, vasospasm and elastic recoil [42]. In practice, it is difcult to distinguish between these multiple mechanical factors, and it is common for there to be signicant over­lap. However, intravascular imaging with ultrasound or optical coherence tomogra­phy may be useful to determine the dominant mechanism.
Hypercoagulability factors are also known to play a role [43]. These range from the disruption of plaque contents which leads to tissue factors within the lipid core encountering the circulating blood to inadequate intra-procedural heparinisation. There are also a group of patients who are resistant to heparin and/or antiplatelet
86
https://t.me/medicina_free
agents making them more susceptible to thrombus formation, even with correct dos­age administration [44, 45].
A dissection which results in pressurised blood ow into the false lumen may propagate, spiral, compromise the true lumen and result in complete obstruction of ow. Stents and tack devices may be useful to treat ow-limiting dissection and overcome elastic recoil. However, they are not without their own limitations. The introduction of a foreign body into the circulation may result in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation unless antiplatelet agents are used and they remain vulner­able to metal fatigue-related fracture [46, 47].
A. Stathis et al.
Restenosis
It is well established that the barotrauma exerted on the blood vessel wall by an inated angioplasty balloon may lead to negative remodeling and recurrent stenosis [23]. It is also a common view amongst peripheral interventionalists that dissection itself is a predictor of negative remodeling and target lesion failure [48]. It is uncer­tain whether the dissection is a marker for more advanced patterns of disease leading to reduced vessel compliance which predisposes to both the dissection and progres­sive disease or whether the dissection itself triggers a more exuberant form of NIH and elastic recoil that results in that recurrent stenosis. In the coronary literature, angiographic dissection has been classied and found to be associated with worse clinical outcomes [49, 50]. While it is known that physicians are more likely to implant stents with more severe forms of dissection, we know less about whether peripheral artery dissections lead to early restenosis and loss of patency [51, 52]. One observational study by Kobayashi etal. divided dissection types into 3 groups (A, no dissection; B, mild dissection; C, severe dissection) and followed 319 patients longi­tudinally after undergoing PTA for femoropopliteal disease. They found that 3-year primary patency was signicantly reduced in those patients with severe dissection, but not mild (66.0% in group A, 63.8% in group B and 32.5% in group C; p<0.001). This nding was more pronounced in longer length disease which was another inde­pendent predictor of reduced patency. They recommended that stents were not required for mild and short dissections, but that they continue to be used for severe dissection, particularly over longer lengths. Another study by Fujihara etal. used the NHLBI angiographic grading system to evaluate outcomes in 621 patients being treated for de novo disease of the supercial femoral artery [52]. They found that severe dissection was a signicant risk factor for restenosis, which rose progressively from types C to F, and that after 2-year follow-up, the severe dissection group (types C–F) showed a signicantly lower patency rate (p < 0.001) and higher clinically driven TLR (p<0.001) compared to the non-severe group (no dissection and type A–B dissection). Together, these studies support the view of many experts in the eld that severe dissection is a predictor of early restenosis and target lesion failure.
5 Blood Vessel Compliance, Barotrauma and Angioplasty-Induced Dissection…
https://t.me/medicina_free
87
The Classication ofDissection
A detailed classication of angioplasty-induced dissection is helpful to provide uniform consistency in reporting and use in clinical trials and to guide discussion around treatment. Several classication systems have been proposed, many of which have been developed as tools to guide coronary interventions. Translation to a peripheral artery application is feasible as most systems can be made to apply to both arterial regions. However, experts disagree as to the relevance of some coronary dissection characteristics to peripheral arteries which have sev­eral distinct and important differences. Herein, we discuss the systems in common use.
Classication Systems: Angiography
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (NHLBI PTCA) Registry published its manual of operations in 1985, describing the morphological presentations of arterial dissections that occur during percutaneous coronary interventions [53]. In the mid-1980s, cine-loop uoroscopy was the dominant imaging modality used to diagnose and classify dissections, with less availability of intravascular ultrasound. The classication system developed by the NHLBI reected that period. It distinguished six categories ranging from simple linear to spiral morphologies (A–F). It included contrast extravasation as a separate category and those with a persistent lling defect and total occlusion of the target vessel. These are illustrated in Table5.1.
NHLBI has been the predominant classication method used for peripheral artery dissection for many years; however, some suggest that it is overly complex to be applied in routine daily practice and may incorporate features that are not rele­vant to peripheral artery angioplasty. For example, extravasation of contrast may be a very important nding in the coronary vascular bed but is usually a benign feature of peripheral artery interventions. This led to the simplied classication system developed specically for peripheral artery interventions by Kobayashi etal [54]. It consists of three categories based on digital subtraction angiography (Table5.2): group A where there was no angiographic dissection; group B, where there was mild dissection (the width of the dissection was less than one-third of the lumen); and group C, severe dissection, where the width of the dissection was more than one-third of the lumen. Spiral dissection was included in group C.Its simple design was intended to facilitate wide adoption in everyday practice; however, its lack of detail limited its utility in differentiating features which experts recognise as having clinical prognostic value and its use in clinical research as a method of categorisation.
88
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 5.1 The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) dissection classication system of procedural coronary artery dissections [53]
Type Description Depiction
A Minor radiolucency within the lumen during
contrast injection with no persistence of contrast after luminal clearance
B Linear dissection with parallel tracts or double
lumen, with no persistence of contrast
C Extra-luminal ‘cap’ of contrast with persistence
after clearance of luminal contrast
D Spiral-shaped dissection, usually with lling
defects within the false lumen
E New persistent lling defect in the arterial
lumen
A. Stathis et al.
F Dissection with total occlusion of the arterial
lumen and no distal antegrade ow
Table 5.2 Classication of angiographic dissections after balloon angioplasty for supercial femoral artery disease
Category Degree of dissection
A No angiographic dissection B The width of the dissection was less than one-third of the lumen C The width of the dissection is more than one-third of the lumen, or there is a spiral
dissection
From Kobayashi etal. [54]
Classication Systems: Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
Angiographic assessment of peripheral arteries during percutaneous intervention has several limitations. It relies upon a two-dimensional image of the arterial lumen. The detail of the blood vessel wall is limited to calcication and contrast entering a false lumen even with multiple orthogonal views. It provides little detail
5 Blood Vessel Compliance, Barotrauma and Angioplasty-Induced Dissection…
https://t.me/medicina_free
89
of plaque morphology, is challenged in the evaluation of thrombus and often underestimates blood vessel diameter and also the presence/severity of dissec­tion itself.
The use of IVUS as an adjunctive imaging modality has grown in popularity since the 1990s. It provides information not available from angiography and is par­ticularly useful in the evaluation of dissection, where it gives an accurate determina­tion of depth and degree of arterial injury. Moreover, high-resolution IVUS can visualise the nature of material which is compromising the lumen, to differentiate between plaque, thrombus and intramural haematoma.
A Dutch study investigated the use of IVUS for the evaluation of dissection, performing both qualitative and quantitative analyses [55]. The qualitative analysis evaluated vascular wall damage, classifying the degree of injury as atherosclerotic plaque radial tear of the intimal surface, dissection (a radial tear separating the lesion from the underlying arterial wall) and/or medial rupture. The extent of dissec­tion was then quantied and classied into one of the four groups (absent, minor, moderate and severe) as determined by 30° incremental arcs of the blood vessel circumference in cross section (Table 5.3). While this system provides a good framework to classify the degree and extent of dissection, it is limited in its descrip­tion of other features thought to be clinically important, such as length, luminal diameter reduction and spiral morphology.
The more contemporary iDissection grading system is an alternative IVUS­based method proposed by Shammas etal. in 2018 [56]. It consists of six dissec­tion grades which combine depth of injury (from the intima to adventitia) with circumference of dissection (<180° or ≥180°), features known to inuence clini­cal outcomes (Table5.4). However, those authors acknowledged that the grading system did not consider the length of the dissection and the presence of thrombus.
Table 5.3 Classication of dissections in femoropopliteal arteries after balloon angioplasty
Dissection Extent of dissection as assessed by IVUS
Absent No dissection Mild 30°–90° arc of the circumference involved Moderate 120°–180° arc of the circumference involved Severe 210°–360° arc of the circumference involved
Adapted from Van der Lugt etal. [55]
Table 5.4 The iDissection classication scheme
Dissection Circumference <180° Circumference ≥180°
Intima A1 A2 Media B1 B2 Adventitia C1 C2
Adapted from Shammas etal. [56]
90
https://t.me/medicina_free
It also failed to include spiral morphology and ow; however, it is a practical sys­tem that has the potential for wide adoption. The authors recommended a large, prospective registry to determine its role in predicting outcomes after arterial intervention.
While IVUS has been shown to identify dissections at higher frequency and in greater detail than conventional angiography, it is not available to all interventional­ists and is more challenged in considering ow patterns, and its interpretation requires both skill and experience [36, 57]. It is therefore not universally applicable and is likely to remain an adjunctive imaging modality for the foreseeable future. It is our view that we will continue to rely on an angiographic classication system for dissection, one that is developed for peripheral arteries, underscored by expert opin­ion and validated as a predictor of clinical outcomes.
A. Stathis et al.
The DiSForM Classication System
The DiSForM (Diameter reduction, Spiral shape, Flow impairment or adverse Morphology) classication system was developed as a practical, universally appli­cable, angiography-based method of categorising arterial dissection designed spe­cically for peripheral arteries. It was developed utilising a three-stage Delphi consensus panel of experts to rst determine angiographic features of clinical importance and then rank them for signicance. Subsequently, a treatment algo­rithm was designed to assist interventionalists in managing angioplasty-induced dissection.
The features identied were luminal diameter reduction of ≥50%, spiral congu­ration, degree of ow impairment (by developing the FLIPI (FLow Impairment in Peripheral Intervention) grading system) and adverse morphology (length ≥2cm and/or multiple dissections). The DiSForM classication system was based on the consensus of 17 expert interventional radiologists, interventional cardiologists, vas­cular surgeons and vascular medicine specialists who were asked to rate a series of combined dissection features for their likelihood to lead to acute occlusion and/or restenosis (Table 5.5). This then gives each individual dissection a pathological classication (DxSxFxMx) which can be used to aid treatment planning and evalua­tion, prognosis prediction, information exchange and the ongoing investigation of peripheral artery dissections. This classication system has features similar to the TNM system which is in common use for the classication of malignant tumors [58]. Examples of peripheral dissections classied using DiSForM are given in Fig.5.2.
In the nal Delphi round, the results of all possible DxSxFxMx combinations were collated and analysed to validate its use as a decision-making tool and provide a treatment algorithm, which is given in Fig.5.3.
D
D
5 Blood Vessel Compliance, Barotrauma and Angioplasty-Induced Dissection…
https://t.me/medicina_free
91
Table 5.5 The DiSForM (Diameter reduction, Spiral shape, Flow impairment or adverse Morphology) classication system for peripheral artery dissection
DiSForM category Parameter Description of parameter as assessed on DSA
Di Diameter
reduction
D0Diameter reduction of <50% D1Diameter reduction of ≥50%
a
S Spiral shape S0Non spiral (linear) conguration
S1Any spiral conguration
F Flow
impairment
F0FLIPI 0: Normal antegrade ow
b
F1FLIPI 1: Reduced antegrade ow F2FLIPI 2: Minor antegrade penetration F3FLIPI 3: No ow-through dissected segment, only
collateral lling
M Morphology M0On single dissection <2cm length
M1Multiple <2cm length dissections OR a single
dissection ≥2cm
M2Multiple ≥2cm dissections
a
DSA digital subtraction angiography
b
FLIPI ow impairment in peripheral intervention
a
1S0F0M0
c
1S1F2M1
b
D0S0F1M
d
D1S0F3M
1
1
Fig. 5.2 (a–d) Dissection examples classied using the DiSForM classication system for periph­eral artery dissections (note that ow must be rated on digital subtraction angiography and cannot be determined by a static image)
The strengths of the DiSForM classication system are that it is broadly appli­cable, does not rely on the availability of IVUS, is designed by experts in peripheral intervention specically for use in that region and requires little additional training to incorporate into clinical practice. Future studies are planned to validate its utility as a tool for predicting short- and mid-term clinical outcomes.