Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5383_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
References
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
82 Ladenstein, R., Pötschger, U., Valteau-Couanet, D. etal. (2018). Interleukin 2with
anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18/CHO (dinutuximab beta) in patients with high-risk
neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. The
Lancet Oncology 19 (12): 1617.
83 Ahmed, M. and Cheung, N.-K.V. (2014). Engineering anti-GD2monoclonal
antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. FEBS Letters 588 (2): 288.
84 Tong, W., Sprules, T., Gehring, K., and Saragovi, H. (2012). Rational design of
peptide ligands against a glycolipid by NMR studies. Methods in Molecular Biology
(Clifton, N.J.) (928): 39.
85 Matthay, K.K., George, R.E., and Yu, A.L. (2012). Promising therapeutic targets in
neuroblastoma. Clinical Cancer Research 18 (10): 2740.
86 Perez Horta, Z., Goldberg, J.L., and Sondel, P.M. (2016). Anti-GD2mAbs and
next-generation mAb-based agents for cancer therapy. Immunotherapy 8 (9): 1097.
87 Sait, S. and Modak, S. (2017). Anti-GD2 immunotherapy for neuroblastoma. Expert
Review of Anticancer Therapy 17 (10): 889.
88 Unituxin. In Assessment report, (CHMP), Committee for Medicinal Products for
Human Use, Ed. EMA/CHMP/408316/2015: European Medicines Agency, 2015.
89 Sterner, E., Peach, M.L., Nicklaus, M.C., and Gildersleeve, J.C. (2017). Therapeutic
antibodies to ganglioside GD2 Evolved from highly selective germline antibodies.
Cell Reports 20 (7): 1681.
90 Castel, V., Segura, V., and Canete, A. (2010). Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma
with anti-GD2 antibodies. Clinical & Translational Oncology 12 (12): 788.
91 Markham, A. (2021). Naxitamab: first approval. Drugs 81 (2): 291.
92 DANYELZA®. 4707781, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2020).
93 Nakamura, K., Tanaka, Y., Shitara, K., and Hanai, N. (2001). Construction of
humanized anti-ganglioside monoclonal antibodies with potent immune effector
functions. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 50: 275–284.
94 Yang, L., Ma, X., Liu, Y. etal. (2017). Chimeric antigen receptor 4SCAR-GD2-
modified T cells targeting high-risk and recurrent neuroblastoma: a phase II
multi-center trial in China. Blood 130: 335.
95 Quintarelli, C., Orlando, D., Boffa, I. etal. (2018). Choice of costimulatory domains
and of cytokines determines CAR T-cell activity in neuroblastoma.
Oncoimmunology 7: 3518.
221


8
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Carbohydrates inTissue Engineering
Laura Russo
1
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, Piazza della Scienza 2,
Milan, 20126, Italy
2
National University of Ireland Galway, CÚRAM SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, Galway,
1,2
and Francesco Nicotra
1
8.1 Introduction
Carbohydrates cover both the cellular and acellular components of organs and tissues. Their role as signaling molecules is well established today[1]. The diversity
and dynamism of the sodefined “glycosignature” on cell surfaces and the extracellular matrix (ECM) partner proteins are still intriguing and not yet fully understood.
In the fields of tissue engineering and medical devices, carbohydrates play a fundamental role in both structural and signaling properties. The first applications in
fact took advantage of the structural properties of numerous polysaccharides, prone
to generate hydrogels[2, 3]. Hyaluronic acid (HA), for example, has been widely
employed for regenerative purposes because of its capacity to generate a wide range
of hydrogel formulations. Besides this structural role, carbohydrates can be exploited
in the development of medical devices for their unique property to participate in
recognition events of physiological and pathological relevance. In this context, it is
also important to take into account that glycans are differently expressed in humans
in various pathophysiological states and across different species[4], with a consequent problem in terms of antigenicity when a medical device is made of animal
derived materials[5, 6]. Here in this chapter, we will review the glycoengineered
solution for both medical devices and tissue engineering applications, taking into
consideration not only the advantages but also the dark side that limits their translation in clinics and the challenges for their further development.
223
Carbohydrate-Based Therapeutics, First Edition. Edited by Roberto Adamo and Luigi Lay.
© 2024 WILEY-VCH GmbH. Published 2024 by WILEY-VCH GmbH.

224
8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and
Synthetic Strategies
In the last decades, the advancement in medical device and biomaterials research
gave rise to different strategies to substitute or replace tissues and organs damaged
by pathologies or trauma[7]. Several different biomaterials are available on the market for this purpose, and great efforts are still in place to overcome the current limitations to safely apply them in clinics.
The traditional classification of biomaterials employed as tissue substitutes
includes natural polymers, synthetic polymers, hybrid materials, and naturally
derived organs and tissues[8–10]. Polysaccharides are relevant components of an
ideal biomaterial for their structural properties[11–14]. However, it is important to
pay attention to the fact that smaller glycans can act as xenoantigens [15, 16], in
particular those exposed in animalderived prosthesis and medical devices. As often
in biomedical research, the current design of biocompatible materials replacing tissue structure and functions takes inspiration from Nature. Polysaccharides are present in natural ECMs as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and proteoglycans (PGs),
whereas N and Oglycosylation cover cell surface and act as a signature to interact
with proteinbased components of the ECM [3, 17, 18]. In this large plethora of
actors, glycans cover a multitude of roles fundamental to finely regulating tissue
morphogenesis and homeostasis. Depending on the features of the organ or tissue
that must be repaired or substituted, the origin of the damage (pathological or traumatic), its morphological features and functionalities, different classes of biomaterials can be exploited. The current approach to repair tissue damage includes both
total substitution[19] or the induction of tissue regenerationexploiting bioresponsive biomaterials able to stimulate the repair of the damaged tissue[20]. The traditional substitution approach requires the use of permanent prosthesis, whereas in
regenerative approaches, biodegradable biomaterials able to induce regeneration
invivo or exvivo are used. In the following paragraph, we will overview the role of
glycans in both approaches, presenting and discussing the devices already used in
clinical applications and the strategies studied for future developments.
8.2.1 Carbohydrates asBuilding Blocks forMedical
Device Formulation
Natural polysaccharides are largely employed in the formulation or coating of medical devices[2]. Those of human origin, even if in principle biocompatible, present
significant limitations related to availability and scaleup. Production by recombinant methodologies can be a solution, like in the case of HA[21]. A practical alternative consists of their isolation from vegetal or animal sources in which they are
abundant, provided that they are biocompatible and functional. The unique way to
obtain employable batches of sulfated polysaccharides, for example, is the extraction of them from animal source[22].

8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and Synthetic Strategies
Heparan sulfate
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
8.2.1.1 Human Polysaccharides: Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and
Proteoglycans (PGs)
Polysaccharides like HA, heparan sulfate (HS), heparin, and chondroitin sulfate
(CS) (see Figure8.1) are naturally expressed in all human tissues and organs and
contribute to the physical properties and physiological function of the tissues of
reference[23]. They have been used in the formulation of bioactive medical devices
to perform their natural functions (structural and functional), properly affected by
functionalization and crosslinking that modulate the bioactivity and degradation
rate[24].
Since 1934, HA has been the most employed polysaccharide for the development
of medical devices, tissue engineering strategies, and cosmetic formulations[25].
Differentially crosslinked HA has been developed to produce dried matrix or injectable hydrogels, depending on the final application of interest[25]. The main fields
of application of HA include neurosurgery, orthopedy, and woundhealing treatment of the skin affected by trauma or pathologies[26]. Several examples of commercially available HAbased materials are currently employed in clinical practices.
The use of HAbased biomaterials for tissue regeneration takes inspiration from its
natural functions; the use in wound healing[4–6], for example, is inspired by the
massive presence of HA in the normal epidermis, where it plays a fundamental role
in the maintenance of tissue mechanical properties and hydration, as far as in cell
migration and proliferation. Remarkably, HAbased materials are also effective in
extreme disruptive conditions like chronic damage[27]. The fast invivo degradation
of HA is still one of the major limitations for its efficacious application in medical
devices, therefore requiring stabilization strategies. To stabilize HA and finely tune
the structural properties without affecting the biological properties[28], different
225
O
O
O
O
O
HO
OR
–
R1 = H or SO
3
Chondroitin sulphate
O
HO
OR
O O
R= H or SO
OR
O
3
O
O
HO
–
R1 = Ac or SO
3
1
–
R3 = H or SO
3
O
HO
OH
O
O
O
O
OH
HO
NH
OR
O
2
O
NHR
n
R= H or SO
O
1
n
–
3
OH
O
HO
O
S
O
O
O
R1 = SO
O
OH
Hyaluronic acid
O
–
OOC
O
O
R
2
–
or Ac; R2 = H or SO
3
Heparin
O
O
HO
R1HN
Figure8.1 Examples of polysaccharides expressed in human tissues.
O
NH
OR
O
O
2
O
O
NHR
n
–
3
O
S
O
O
1
n
–
3

n
226
Figure8.2 Hyaluronic acid benzyl ester.
degrees of esterification, typically performed with benzyl alcohol, have been experi-
®
mented with. HYAFF
is a registered HA benzyl ester (see Figure8.2), employed in
particular for wound healing[29] and cartilage tissue repair[30].
Cutaneous lesions generated by burns, ulcers, or trauma are usually cured with
skin grafts; however, if the covering process cannot be immediately performed,
biomaterialbased patches are employed to induce the correct recovery and regeneration of the damaged area[31]. HYAFFbased medical devices have been successfully employed for the regeneration of cutaneous lesions, and the different
esterification degrees and formulation methodologies allow for modulation of the
final shape/geometries of the device[32]. HYAFF has also been employed in chondrogenic tissue engineering applications for its ability to induce cartilage formation[33]. In vitro studies employing 3D HYAFFbased matrices showed the ability
of autologous chondrocytes to restore the physiological signatures of hyaline cartilage[34], whereas invivo studies demonstrated that seeding with autologous chondrocytes induces native cartilage tissue formation with optimal integration in the
surrounding tissue[33]. Hyalograft C, a medical device based on cartilage autograft
obtained from patient chondrocytes cultured on HYAFF, was introduced for surgical arthroscopic techniques in 1999 [35, 36]. In 2013, following an European
Medicines Agency (EMA) report on manufacturing practices, Hyalograft C was
withdrawn from the European market[37]. Today, methodologies for treatment of
cartilage include new approaches in which autologous chondrocytes are delivered
into damaged tissues with HA or collagenbased injectable biomaterials[38]. HA is
also employed, in different formulations, in ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs)
or dermatological therapies[39]. The first use of untreated HA in ophthalmic surgery was reported in cornea transplantation and, today, it is currently employed in
ocular surgeries for corneal protection and vitreous replacement [40]. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first viscosurgical device based on HA in
®
1983, under the trademark Healon
[41, 42]. Healaflow®, an FDAapproved HA
crosslinked with 1,4butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE), is employed in vitreoretinal surgery[43]. Other ophthalmic applications include the modification of contact
lenses with HA solutions. Recently, HA has been exploited to improve contact lens
performance or obtain a controlled release of HA in the eye[44, 45]. Other FDA
approved products based on crosslinked HA include hydrogels in which the
crosslinking is performed with divinyl sulphone (DVS), such as commercial dermal

8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and Synthetic Strategies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
defect fillers (Hylaform®, CaptiqueTM, Prevelle®, Lift®, and Varioderm®). In the
cosmetic field, the most employed HAcrosslinked hydrogels are based on the men-
®
tioned HADVS and HABDDE (Restylane
, Juvéderm®, Teosyal®, and Hyabell®) as
injectable materials[39, 46–48].
Sulfated polysaccharides, normally linked to proteins as PGs, have impressive biochemical and structural roles in the regulation of tissue morphology and cell development and have consequently been extensively employed in medical devices and
studied for clinical translation. Among them, CS, a sulfated linear polysaccharide
based on repeating units of glucuronic acid (GlcA) and Nacetylgalactosamine
(GalNAc) (Figure 8.1), has been largely employed in the biomaterials field
[2, 49–51]. The sulfation pattern of CS, usually at the positions4 and 6, affects the
physiological role. CS is found in many tissues and organs of the human body, from
central nervous system (CNS) to cartilage, skin, bones, and blood vessels. In particular, the major efforts in the development of CSbased medical devices are focused on
the replacement or treatment of cartilage defects and the regeneration of CNS functions. CS is often employed in combination with other natural polymers to generate
®
hybrid medical devices. Esoxx
is a hybrid medical device employed as mucosal bar-
rier for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on HA and CS
®
embedded in Lutrol
F 127, a poloxamer with bioadhesive properties [52]. HA/
CSbased medical devices are also employed as injectable hydrogel to treat osteoar-
®
thritic (OA) knee, as reported for Structovial CS
[53]. In this formulation, CS has a
double role: optimizing the HA rheological properties and regulating the cartilage
metabolism and remodeling[53]. CS is also extensively employed in formulations
with glucosamine for oral administration as Symptomatic Slow Acting Drugs for
Osteoarthritis (SYSADOA), even if this use is still debated and several clinical studies are ongoing[54]. Other sulfated polysaccharides exploited in clinical translation
are HS and heparin (Figure8.1). HS is heavily expressed in the ECM and on the cell
surface as HSPGs . The structure and length of the polysaccharide chains are highly
variable due to the different sulfation degrees, the different combinations of disaccharide components, and, like for other ECM polysaccharides, the variable molecular weight [55]. The typical disaccharide components consist of 40–60% of
βglucuronic acid (GlcA) or αiduronic acid (IdoA) linked by (1
→ 4) glycosidic
bonds to glucosamine, which can be Nacetylated or Nsulfated[56, 57]. Mimetics
of HS have been developed by derivatizing dextran with carboxymethyl, carboxymethyl benzylamide, and carboxymethyl benzylamide sulfonate groups[58, 59]. An
®
example is a commercially available product named RGTA
the treatment of chronic skin damages (CACIPLIQ20
®
(Cacicol20
). Other applications of RGTA are under study and include osteochon-
, currently employed for
®
) and for corneal regeneration
dral, gastroenterological, cardiac, and nervous system applications[60]. Heparin
contains the same monosaccharides of HS, which can also be, in this case, sulfated
as Ido(2S) and GlcA(2S), and the GlcN unit can be Nsulfated (GlcNS) or N acetylated
(GlcNAc) with differential patterns and degrees[61]. The substitution patterns with
Osulfate and Nacetyl groups result in a wide range of complex structures. Also,
heparin has been largely investigated and employed in the pharmaceutical and
227

228
material device fields for different applications, even if, considering its main role as
an anticoagulant, the use of heparinbased medical devices is mainly focused on
bloodcontacting materials[61, 62]. Temporary or permanent devices like hemodialysis catheters, coronary or vascular stents and grafts, bypass devices, and extracorporeal circulation devices exploit heparincoated materials[57, 62–64]. The two
general methods employed for the development of heparincoated devices are based
on eluting technologies and noneluting technologies. Eluting technologies include
all the approaches in which heparin is released in a controlled way, taking advantage of noncovalent coatings based on physical or ionic interactions [62, 65, 66].
These methods are employed when heparin delivery is needed to prevent acute and
local devicerelated blood clots. The other approach is based on the covalent functionalization of the medical device surface with heparin[67, 68]. This approach is
desirable when longterm thromboresistance is needed at the material surface.
Different conjugation methodologies exploit the direct coupling of complementary
functional groups already present in heparin and the material surface counterpart,
or alternatively introduce new chemoselective orthogonal functional groups and
properly tailored linkers to better control heparin exposition and consequently the
antithrombotic activity. The chemical nature of the medical device will influence
the choice in light of the functional groups eventually present at the surface or,
alternatively, introducible upon proper treatment. The most employed conjugation
methodologies are based on carbodiimide chemistry, exploiting the carboxyl group
of heparin, or oxidation mediated by periodate, for controlled oxidative degradation
to generate some aldehydes[69]. A coating material based on heparin, polyethylene
oxide, and sulphonate groups covalently conjugated to hydrophilic modified poly-
TM
ethyleneimine (ASTUTE
and licensed to Medtronic as Trillium
dialysis catheters[62, 64]. Another example is Bioline
technology) has been developed by BioInteractions Ltd
®
to cover cardiopulmonary bypass and hemo-
®
, developed by Jostra AG and
now a property of Maquet Medical, a material obtained with heparin linked to
human albumin employed for coating vascular grafts and cardiopulmonary
bypass[63, 70]. The conjugation of heparin to polyamine carriers, performed by
introducing etherofunctional crosslinkers, is currently employed as Corline
Heparine Surface Technology, developed by Corline System AB. Many other coating
methodologies employed for the modification of medical device surfaces to control
the interface between blood components and material surface, and to minimize
blood clot formation and thrombolytic events are reported with other commercial
examples in Table8.1.
®
8.2.1.2 Polysaccharides fromPlants, Algae, Animal, and
Microbial Fermentation
The large availability of polysaccharides derived from plants, algae, and animals
and the possibility to produce them by microbial fermentation make them very
attractive and cheaper starting materials[13]. Several studies are focused on the
biocompatibility of such polysaccharides, and many of them are already in clinical
applications. These polysaccharides present an interesting variety of biochemical
and physical properties that can eventually be advantageously exploited in

8.2 Biomaterials and Medical Devices: Natural and Synthetic Strategies
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Table8.1 Examples of commercial heparin-coating technologies.
Polymer Commercial names Application References
229
HA benzyl ester
Sodium hyaluronate
HA–BDDE
HA–DVS and
HA–BDDE
HA–CS embedded in
®
Lutrol
HA–CS
Mimetics of
HS–derivatized
dextran with
sulfonate groups
Heparin, polyethylene
oxide, and sulfonate
groups covalently
conjugated to
polyethyleneimine
Heparin linked to
human albumin
Heparin linked by
reductive amination
to matrices bearing
amino groups
Heparin UV
photocrosslinked
Layer by layer
coatings. The last layer
(4) is coated with
polyethyleneimine
linked to Heparin by
reductive amination
Heparin and
benzalkonium
chloride blended
HYAFF
®
Osteochondral
regeneration, wound
[29, 30,
32–34]
healing
®
Healon
Healaflow
®
HADVS (Hylaform
TM
Captique
Varioderm
(Restylane
Teosyal
Esoxx
, Prevelle®, Lift®,
®
) HABDDE
®
, Juvéderm®,
®
, Hyabell®)
®
®
,
Viscosurgical devices [41, 42]
Vitreoretinal
[43]
surgery[43]
Dermal defect fillers [39, 46–48]
Treatment of gastro
[52]
esophageal reflux
symptoms
Structovial CS
®
Treatment of
osteoarthritic (OA)
[53]
knee
®
RGTA
(CACIPLIQ20® and
®
Cacicol20
)
ASTUTE™/TRILLIUM
coating
BIOLINE
®
Coating
Chronic skin
damages and
corneal regeneration
Hemodialysis
®
catheters, bypass
devices
Vascular grafts,
extracorporeal
[58–60]
[62, 64]
[63, 70]
circulation devices
CARMEDA
®
Surface (CBAS
Surface)
BioActive
®
Heparin
Extracorporeal
circulation devices,
stentgrafts, vascular
grafts, ventricular
[62, 71]
assist devices
PHOTOLINK
®
Various medical
devices
[62]
Hepamed™ Coronary stents [62, 72]
DURAFLO II
®
Extracorporeal
circulation devices
[62]

230
biomedical applications. Furthermore, they can be properly modified to control the
properties and final morphologies of a large plethora of formulations. The main
nonhuman polysaccharides exploited for biomedical devices are alginates, carrageenan, and fucoidan (derived from algae), dextran, pullulan, and gellan (derived
from microbes), and chitosan (derived from animals) (see Figure8.3).
–
+
Na
O
HO
Na+ –OCC
O
HO
R
O
OH
HO
HO
OH
1
O
G
O
OH
Alginate
OH
O
NH
2
Chitosan
OH
2
O
R
1
Carrageenan
R= –OH, OSO
O
OH
O
O
OH
O
HO
Pullulan
O
HO
HO
O
COO
OH
O
M
NH
HO
O
2
O
O
n
OH
R
5
R
3
O
O
R
4
n
–
3
OH
O
OH
OH
O
HO
HO
HO
HO
O
O
O
OH
O
n
OH
HOOC
OH
O
O
HO
OH
O
O
HO
Gellan gum
HO
HO
OH
HO
HO
OH
O
HO
OH
O
O
OH
O
O
O
OH
HO
Dextran
OH
Fucoidan
O
OH
OH
O
OH
O
O
HO
OH
O
HO
OSO
OH
OH
O
OH
O
HO
O
O
OSO
O
O
–
OSO
3
–
3
HO
O
O
O
O
O
n
n
O
O
–
OSO
3
–
3
Figure8.3 Examples of nonhuman polysaccharides employed for biomedical device
formulations.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
