Заключение

В работе впервые в рамках отечественной психологии предпринята попытка систематизации разрозненного поля зарубежных исследований мировоззрения. Более четко очерчена предметная область «социального мировоззрения личности». Предложено авторское определение этого термина, который только начинает входить в российский научный дискурс и употребляется пока в единичных случаях. Критически оценены границы применимости западных теорий и методик в области изучения социального мировоззрения личности, в частности, показана неправомерность прямого заимствования западных идей и методик в рассмотренной области. Обозначена возможность разработки самостоятельной отечественной «Психологии мировоззрения» как новой области исследований, фокусирующейся на изучении актуальных для российского общества мировоззренческих вопросах. Таким образом, представленный аналитический обзор обладает научной новизной и теоретической значимостью, для отечественной психологии.

Практическая значимость данной работы состоит в следующем. Во-первых, представлен обзор современных психодиагностических методик, разработанных авторами, принадлежащими к западной и восточной культуре, с указанием различий в валидности западных методик на западных и восточных выборках. Это позволит отечественным исследователям, при разработке отечественных вариантов методик, сразу опираться на западные и восточные методики, чтобы вывести «среднее» и выделить пункты, наиболее адекватные для нашей евразийской культуры. Во-вторых, понимание того, что отношение к другим людям и их поведению, к коррупции, к мигрантам, к экологическим проблемам связано с базовыми убеждениями об устройстве социального мира (опасный / безопасный, конкурентный / кооперативный, с нулевой / положительной суммой), может быть полезно политическим психологам и психологам-консультантам.

Список литературы / References

1. Alessiato, E. (2022). What is a Worldview? Some Suggestions from the History of the Concept. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12404

2. Andrews-Fearon, P., & Götz, F.M. (2024). The zero-sum mindset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(4), 758–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000404

3. Armaly, M.T., & Enders, A.M. (2024). Who Supports Political Violence? Perspectives on Politics, 22(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722001086

4. Cheng, S.-L., Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Li, Y., Liu, S., & Cheng, S. (2024). Worldview, psychological flexibility, and depression-anxiety-stress in Chinese youth. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1447183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1447183

5. Chinoy, S., Nunn, N., Sequeira, S., & Stantcheva, S. (2025). Zero-sum Thinking and the Roots of US Political Differences. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 53 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31688

6. Chuang, F., Manley, E., & Petersen, A. (2020). The role of worldviews in the governance of sustainable mobility, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(8), 4034–4042. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916936117

7. Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Lewis, K.A. (2017). Romantic relationships in the ecosystem: Compassionate goals, nonzero-sum beliefs, and change in relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000076

8. Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C.R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A.L.J., Recchia, G., … van der Linden, S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193

9. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in experimental social psychology, 33, 41–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6

10. Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S.W., & Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x

11. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75

12. Dunwoody, P.T., & Funke, F. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a New Three Factor Measure of Authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), e4955. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168

13. Gaitho, N. (2022). Critical analysis of the prevailing worldviews and value systems in relation to how they are shaped by culture and identity. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 7(2), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v7i2.1210

14. Gavrilets, S., & Seabright, P. (2025). The evolution of zero-sum and positive-sum worldviews. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122(32), e2504339122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2504339122

15. Guo, Q., Muhetaer, P., & Hu, P. (2023). Cultural worldviews and support for governmental management of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 879. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02339-w

16. Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K.E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A.L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003-1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

17. Holmes, O.S., Findlay, B.M., & Cook, R. (2021). Worldview psychology and the representation of spirituality, naturalism, and agnosticism: conceptualisation and psychometric measurement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1918534

18. Hsu, H.-Y., & Wang, T. (2024). Opposite effects of RWA and SDO on war support: Chinese public opinion toward Russia's war in Ukraine. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(2), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12706

19. Hsu, H.-Y., Wang, T., & Feng, X.-Y. (2025). Revisiting the "Lethal Union": The Role of RWA and SDO in the Chinese Public's Reactions to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 60(6), e70125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70125

20. Jost, J.T., Federico, C.M., & Napier, J.L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

21. Kahan, D.M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C.K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x

22. Kauff, M., Lämmle, L., Kroll, E., Gehring, L., Soucek, R., & Asbrock, F. (2024). Should the city be for everyone? The relationship between worldviews, ideological attitudes, and the approval of hostile design. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), e2867. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2867

23. Kugler, M., Jost, J.T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27, 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5

24. Lancaster, C., Alibrahim, M., Carter, C., Mumford, E., & Sheridan-Johnson, J. (2025). Worldview and gun attitudes among American youth and young adults. Social Science Research, 129, 103180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103180

25. Lee, I.-C., Permyakova, T., & Sheveleva, M. (2020). Reducing Negative Attitudes toward Immigrants in Russia and Taiwan: Possible Beneficial Effects of Naïve Dialecticism and an Incremental Worldview. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572386

26. Liu, J.H., Zhang, R.J., Leung, A.K.-Y., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Gastardo-Conaco, C., Vasiutynskyi, V., & Kus-Harbord, L. (2020). Empirical Correlates of Cosmopolitan Orientation: Etiology and Functions in a Worldwide Representative Sample. Political Psychology, 41, 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12644

27. Matsunaga, L.H., Petersen, J., Aoki, T., & Faiad, C. (2024). The science of zero-sum thinking: a scoping review of 10 years of empirical research. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 18(3), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2024.2441504

28. McFarland, S., Hackett, J., Hamer, K., Katzarska-Miller, I., Malsch, A., Reese, G., & Reysen, S. (2019). Global Human Identification and Citizenship: A Review of Psychological Studies. Political Psychology, 40, 141-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12572

29. Nguyen, C.Q., & Ames, D.R. (2025). Savvy or savage? How worldviews shape appraisals of antagonistic leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(6), 1007–1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000456

30. Nilsson, A., & Jost, J.T. (2020). The Authoritarian-Conservatism Nexus. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.003

31. Nilsson, A., & Teymoori, A. (2025). The Dark Side of Ideology: Ideological Worldviews and Antidemocratic Attitudes. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, 1553(1), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70062

32. Olonisakin, T., Adebayo, S., & Idemudia, E. (2021). Social worldviews and social attitudes: Examining the psychological correlates for other-concern. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 4(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2021.7

33. Perry, R., Sibley, C., & Duckitt, J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004

34. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.741

35. Rippl, S. (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 5(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110042598

36. Roberts, R., & Davidai, S. (2022). The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000378

37. Roccato, M., & Ricolfi, L. (2005). On the Correlation Between Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_1

38. Roczniewska, M., & Wojciszke, B. (2021). Reducing Hindering Job Demands: The Role of Belief in Life as a Zero-Sum Game and Workload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910036

39. Różycka-Tran, J., Alessandri, G., Jurek, P., & Olech, M. (2018). A test of construct isomorphism of the Belief in a Zero-Sum Game scale: A multilevel 43-nation study. PLoS One, 13(9), e0203196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203196

40. Różycka-Tran, J., Piotrowski, J.P., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Jurek, P., Osin E.N., … Maltby, J. (2021). Belief in a zero-sum game and subjective well-being across 35 countries. Current Psychology, 40(2), 3575–3584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00291-0

41. Seitova, D., Nariman, H.S., & Kovacs, M. (2023). Cosmopolitanism and social dominance orientation mediate relationship between political orientation and sexism. Acta Psychologica, 240, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104037

42. Šerek, J., & Mužík, M. (2021). Who Does Not Protect Democracy?: Examining the Role of Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111027

43. Shiundu, T.W. (2024). A Critical Examination of Dominant Worldviews and Value Systems: Exploring How Culture and Identity Shape Perspectives. Journal of Human Resource & Leadership, 8(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t30133

44. Siegrist, M., & Bearth, A. (2021). Worldviews, trust, and risk perceptions shape public acceptance of COVID-19 public health measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(24), e2100411118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100411118

45. Takeda, M., Takagi, A., & Toriyama, R. (2025). An Attempt to Construct a Japanese Version of Cultural Worldviews Scale. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 34(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.34.1.5

46. Taylor, M., & Pensini, P. (2025). Zero-Sum Beliefs about the Human–Nature Relationship: The Role of Social Dominance Orientation, Tolerance of Ambiguity, and Need for Cognition. Psychology International, 7(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7040089

47. Tesi, A., & Passini, S. (2025). Why Don't We Care About Others? A Closer Look at Indifference through the Lens of the Dual Process Model and Moral Foundations Theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 55(5), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13096

48. Vilanova, F., Almeida-Segundo, D.S., Milfont, T.L., & Costa, A.B. (2025). Further testing a dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. Current Psychology, 44, 8933–8947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07822-y

49. Vilanova, F., Almeida-Segundo, D.S., Moura, P.B., Pratto, F., & Costa, A.B. (2024). The limited impact of adverse experiences on worldviews and ideologies. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2, 1375527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1375527

50. Vilanova, F., Milfont, T.L., & Costa, A.B. (2022). A dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(4), 854–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000414

51. Xue, W., Hine, D.W., Marks, A.D.G., Phillips, W.J., & Zhao, S. (2016). Cultural worldviews and climate change: a view from China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12116

52. Xue, W., Zeng, Z., Liu, Z., & Marks, A.D.G. (2021). The role of cultural worldviews in predicating gambling risk perception and behavior in a Chinese sample. Brain and Behavior, 11(3), e02015. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2015

53. Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Fundamental Social Motives Mediate the Associations that Dangerous and Competitive Social Worldviews Have with Ideological Attitudes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0164-6

54. Zeigler-Hill, V., & Besser, A. (2022). Social worldviews and the likelihood of engaging in preemptive strikes. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111244

ДАННЫЕ ОБ АВТОРЕ

Нехорошева Инна Владимировна, кандидат психологических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры социальной и педагогической психологии

Государственный университет просвещения

ул. Радио, д. 10А, г. Москва, 105005, Российская Федерация

i-vl-n@mail.ru

DATA ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Inna V. Nekhorosheva, PhD in Psychology, Senior Lecturer of Department of Social and Educational Psychology

State University of Education

10A, Radio st., Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation

i-vl-n@mail.ru

SPIN-code: 5204-1205

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7148-4777

ResearcherID: GLT-6830-2022

Scopus Author ID: 35222205000

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Inna-Nekhorosheva

Academia.edu: https://independent.academia.edu/GoAfin

https://nsportal.ru/nekhorosheva-inna-vladimirovna

https://dzen.ru/science_articles

a Под «самотрансценденцией» понимается характеристика, близкая к смеси альтруизма и духовности: выход за пределы своих личных интересов, понимание связи своей жизни с жизнью других людей, а также вера в существование мира за пределами разведанных границ. Измеряется с помощью Шкалы духовной трансцендентности Ральфа Л. Пьемонта (1999).

b Термин «social worldviews» кажется близким к термину «социальные представления». Но теория социальных представлений Сержа Московичи больше фокусируется на анализе массового сознания, в то время как social worldviews изучаются и в рамках психологии личности.