Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3783_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
138
D. Wang and R. Skoracki
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 19.4 Jejunal mesenteric lymph node ap dissected leaving the
posterior leaet of peritoneum intact. Lymph nodes are identied with a combination of transillumination and palpation
ply to the bowel. Flaps harvested from the periphery of the mesentery have a better balance of arterial inow and venous outow as they contain a more physiologic bal­ance of capillary network to blood ow rate as a function of donor vessel diameter when compared with aps raised closer to the root where the vascular supply largely bypasses the nodes. That is why we recommend design­ing aps from the root of the mesentery as ow-through aps with two arterial and venous anastomoses each (at the distal and proximal end of the ap) at the recipient site.
• The ap is then elevated from the periphery toward the root of the mesentery, preserving the posterior peritoneal layer. Leaving this peritoneum intact or repairing any holes created during dissection prevents an internal hernia.
• Dissection continues until vessel caliber is adequate for microvascular anastomosis and pedicle length is as desired while preserving all major vessels to the jejunum. Pedicle length is generally 3–5cm. The average size of the ap is also around 3–5cm (Fig.19.4).
• After ap elevation, the anterior layer of peritoneum is repaired with a running silk suture as an additional pre­caution against an internal hernia. The abdominal inci­sions are then closed in a standard fashion.
Recipient Site Preparation, Flap Revascularization, andInset
The recipient site is chosen according to the location of the lymphedema and previous treatment history. It includes scar removal when applicable from previous lymph node dissec­tion. Our preference is to perform a proximal scar release and ap placement in cases of Grade 3 (Ohio Scar Scale;
Table 19.1 Ohio Scar Scale – examination and quantication of
lymph node resection scar
Grade Description 0 No scar, no surgical intervention to area 1 Supercial scar, mobile (no tethering, adequate subcutaneous
fat layer)
2 Scar extending into subdermal structures, deep palpable scar,
remains mobile against deeper structures (i.e., chest wall, groin, fascia/musculature)
3 Visible tethering of skin, scar tethering skin to underlying
deeper structure (i.e., chest wall, deep fascia of the groin), scar is usually depressed/dimpling
4 Painful tethered scar
19.1), or greater, scarring and the indications are as
Table outlined below for the upper and the lower extremity [10]. For the upper extremity, the wrist/forearm is chosen if the lymphedema is more severe in the hand and forearm than the upper arm. The axilla is chosen if the complete upper extremity is involved or excess scarring is present in the axilla. The distal leg is chosen if the patient has had a previ­ous peri-aortic or deep pelvic lymph node dissection and inguinal nodes are intact. The groin is chosen if there has been a previous inguinal lymph node dissection and the patient has signicant thigh swelling. However, if these proximal sites have a large area of scarring and require more bulk of vascularized tissue, the omental ap may be a better option. In these cases, we will consider a dual-level node transfer with an omental ap placed proximally and a mes­enteric ap distally.
Typically, a recipient artery and one vein are prepared for anastomosis. In the forearm, either the radial or ulnar artery is used, and in the lower leg, the anterior or posterior tibial artery is typically preferred. Preoperative vascular imaging of the lower extremity can be helpful in patients with primary lymphedema where there may be anatomic variabilities in the presence and caliber of the vasculature. If a partial venous outow obstruction is suspected due to the prior proximal node dissection, a venogram should be performed preoperatively as venous hypertension will place the ap at risk.
Following harvest, the ap is then reperfused at the recipi­ent site (Fig.
19.5). The mesenteric vessels closer to the root
can be larger. If the ap was taken at this level, there can be a mismatch between the arterial inow and the outow pos­sible based on the capillary bed alone. For this reason, we will inset the ap vessels as a ow-through ap with anasto­moses at the distal and proximal ends of the ap artery and vein either in an end-to-side or end-to-end fashion, or if this is not an option, we will perform a direct end-to-end anasto­mosis between distal ap artery and vein to create an arterio­venous (AV) loop and alleviate this problem (Fig.19.5).
Primary skin closure can be achieved if some of the sub-
cutaneous tissue at the recipient site is removed with electro-
ab
19 Step-by-Step Instruction: Jejunal Mesenteric Vascularized Lymph Node Transplant Procedure
https://t.me/medicina_free
c
139
Fig. 19.5 Jejunal mesenteric artery and vein anastomosed to the recip-
ient vessels: (a) arterial anastomosis; (b) venous anastomosis; (c) here, an arteriovenous (AV) loop has also been performed at the distal ap
cautery. In cases when this would place too much pressure on the ap, a small full-thickness skin graft harvested adja­cent to the laparotomy incision can be placed over the mes­enteric lymph node packet (Fig.19.6). This can be excised at a later date if it is cosmetically displeasing to the patient. Flap monitoring can be performed percutaneously with a handheld Doppler over the skin graft or the primarily closed dermis. We have also successfully used an implantable Doppler with the piezoelectric crystal removed from the silastic cuff and inserted directly into the fat of the ap adja­cent to the vasculature.
end to optimize the balance between arterial inow and venous outow for the larger donor vessels included in this ap harvested from the root of the mesentery
eratively. Antibiotics are prescribed for 1week postopera­tively, as patients with lymphedema are at increased risk of infection to the affected limb.
There are also site-specic considerations. For aps to the axilla, the arm should be abducted with an abduction pillow for 1 week postoperatively to avoid ap compression, fol­lowed by gradual return to full shoulder range of motion. The forearm/wrist requires extremity elevation. For the groin, the patient is instructed to avoid hip exion beyond 45 degrees for 3–4weeks postoperatively. Distally placed aps in the lower extremity undergo a strict dangle protocol. Patients resume their compression garments 6–8weeks post­operatively. The patients will see maximal benet at
Postoperative Care
1–2years postoperatively and will be followed in clinic for physical therapy and measurements for the rest of their lives.
Patients are typically admitted to the hospital to the free ap oor with the ap monitored with standard Doppler checks. The orogastric tube is removed during extubation. Diet is
Complications
advanced from clears as tolerated. Occasionally, Reglan may be prescribed to help bowel motility. We use this commonly for omental ap harvests to encourage gastric emptying after manipulation of the greater curvature of the stomach intraop-
A study of 29 patients demonstrated an acceptable complica­tion prole of one ap loss (3.3%), four postoperative her­nias (13.8%), and three nonoperative small bowel
140
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Wang and R. Skoracki
Fig. 19.6 (a) Inset of the ap in the distal extremity. Subcutaneous
tissue can be excised to accommodate the ap, or alternatively a skin graft can be placed over the ap and later excised. Monitoring can be
obstructions (10.3%) [8]. Patients should also be counseled about the inherent risks of this approach including incisional hernias, peritonitis, bowel ischemia, adhesions, and injury to other abdominal organs.
Pearls and Pitfalls
• The mesenteric lymph node donor site allows for the har­vest of multiple packets of lymph nodes from the mesen­tery and/or the omentum to address multiple recipient sites if necessary. The donor site can also be used again at a later time from the original transfer surgery.
• The mesenteric lymph node ap is a good option for het­erotopic transfer to the distal extremity due to its small size and high lymph node density.
• Consider performing a ow-through ap inset or distal AV loop when the ap is taken more toward the root of the mesentery to optimize inow and outow balance for a ap with large (3mm artery and 4mm vein) donor vessels and a relatively small capillary network connecting these.
• For aps harvested from the mesenteric periphery, ensure preservation of blood ow to the adjacent small bowel by careful ap location choice and design.
performed either by an implantable Doppler or through percutaneous Doppler checks. (b) Skin graft is harvested adjacent to the laparotomy site to avoid an additional scar
2. Liebermann DM, Kaufmann M.Utilization of the greater omentum in surgery: a historical review. Neth J Surg. 1991;43:136–44.
3. Shimotsuma M, Simpson-Morgan MW, Takahashi T, Hagiwara A.Activation of omental milky spots and milky spot macrophages by intraperitoneal administration of a streptococcal preparation, OK-432. Cancer Res. 1992;52:5400–2.
4. Ruter D, Chen W, Garza R 3rd, Eiferman D, Skoracki R. Mesoappendix as potential donor site for vascularized lymph node transfer: anatomic study. J Surg Res. 2018;230:143–7.
5. Coriddi M, Wee C, Meyerson J, Eiferman D, Skoracki R. Vascularized jejunal mesenteric lymph node transfer: a novel surgical treatment for extremity lymphedema. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:650–7.
6. Schaverien MV, Hofstetter WL, Selber JC. Vascularized jejunal mesenteric lymph node transfer for lymphedema: a novel approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:468e–9e.
7. Coriddi M, Skoracki R, Eiferman D. Vascularized jejunal mesen­teric lymph node transfer for treatment of extremity lymphedema. Microsurgery. 2017;37:177–8.
8. Kraft CT, Eiferman D, Jordan S, Skoracki RJ.Complications after vascularized jejunal mesenteric lymph node transfer: a 3-year expe­rience. Microsurgery. 2019;39:497–501.
9. Chu CK, Schaverien MV, Chang EI, Hanson SE, Hanasono MM, Selber JC.Intra-abdominal lymph nodes: a privileged donor site for vascularized lymph node transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2673.
10. Coriddi MR, Eiferman DS, Skoracki RJ. Double-level vascular­ized lymph node transfer for treatment of extremity lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg Open. 2017;2:75–7.
References
1. Nguyen AT, Suami H, Hanasono MM, Womack VA, Wong FC, Chang EI.Long-term outcomes of the minimally invasive free vas­cularized omental lymphatic ap for the treatment of lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115:84–9.
Step-by-Step Instruction:
https://t.me/medicina_free
Suction- Assisted Lipectomy Procedure withControlled Compression Therapy
HåkanBrorson
20
Introduction
Our rst liposuction procedure for lymphedema was under­taken in 1987, but it was not until 1993 that a more detailed treatment protocol was established for arm lymphedema [1,
2]. Liposuction for leg lymphedema was established 5years
later. Initially, the “dry” technique was used; the introduc­tion of the use of a tourniquet and tumescence has made liposuction a safe procedure, and there is no longer any need for blood transfusions [3]. Liposuction is the only method to completely reduce chronic non-pitting lymph­edema. The result is maintained with compression garments.
Typical Indications
• Primary and secondary upper and lower extremity lymph-
edema with a limb excess volume of 10% or greater
• Minimal pitting: 4–5mm in arms and 5–6mm in legs
• No active cancer
• No further improvement with conservative treatment
• No active wounds
• No age limit
Supplementary Information The online version of this chapter (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93039-4_20) contains supplemen­tary material, which is available to authorized users.
H. Brorson (*) Lymphedema Center, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden e-mail: hakan.brorson@med.lu.se
Excess Subcutaneous Adiposity andChronic Lymphedema
Liposuction in the only method to completely reduce non­pitting chronic lymphedema where the excess volume is dominated by adipose tissue [46]. The incidence of post­mastectomy arm lymphedema varies between 13% and 52%, depending in part on whether axillary lymph nodes have been removed and postoperative radiation has been given [7,
8]. The sentinel node technique had decreased the incidence
of postoperative lymphedema to an estimated incidence of approximately 6–8% [9]. Risk-reducing surgery using imme­diate lymphatic reconstruction shows an incidence of lymph­edema of 9.1% at short-term follow-up [10].
The outcome of the surgical procedure as well as the radi­ation to the tissues often results in destruction of lymphatic vessels. When this is combined with the removal of lymph nodes and tissue scarring, the lymphatic vessels that remain are likely to be unable to remove the lymph uid load. The remaining lymph collectors become dilated and overloaded, and their valves become incompetent, preventing the lym­phatics from performing their function. This failure spreads distally until even the most peripheral lymph vessels, drain­ing into the affected system, also become dilated [11]. In a parallel process, the cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system of the mesenchymal tissues begin to lose their capa­bility to remove the protein that accumulates. The accumu­lated interstitial proteins, as osmotically active molecules, attract uid to the area. This accumulation of protein and uid is usually a transient phase, lasting between 1 and 3weeks [11].
In the latent phase, there may still initially be no clinical signs of any discernible lymphedema. The latent phase nor­mally varies from about 4months to 10years. At the end of the latent phase, pitting of the edematous limb on pressure can be observed. This can be objectively measured by pleth­ysmography and by decreased tissue compressibility using a tissue tonometer [11, 12].
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 M. V. Schaverien, J. H. Dayan (eds.), Multimodal Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Lymphedema,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93039-4_20
141
142
Excess volume reduction (mean SEM)
Time
Excess volume (ml)
https://t.me/medicina_free
H. Brorson
The enlargement of the extremity leads to discomfort and complaints in the form of heaviness, weakness, pain, tension, and sensory decit of the limb, as well as anxiety, psycho­logical morbidity, maladjustment and social isolation, and increasing hardness of the limb [13, 14]. Adipose tissue deposition already starts within the rst year after lymph­edema onset [1518]. In time, there is also an increase in the adipose tissue content of the swollen limb. The author has observed this clinically since 1987, when the rst lymph­edema patient was operated on [1, 2]. This phenomenon led to further research, as presented in this chapter [1519].
There are various possible explanations for the adipose tis­sue hypertrophy. There is a physiological imbalance of blood ow and lymphatic drainage, resulting in the impaired clear­ance of lipids and their uptake by macrophages [20, 21]. There is increasing support, however, for the view that the fat cell is not simply a container of fat, but it behaves like an endocrine organ and a cytokine-activated cell [22, 23], and chronic inammation plays a role here [24, 25]. The same pathophysi­ology goes for primary and secondary lymphedema. For more detailed information about investigational advances and the relationship between slow lymph ow and adiposity, as well as that between structural changes in the lymphatic system and adiposity, see data from studies published by Harvey etal. [26] and Schneider etal. [27], as well as other studies with con­tributory evidence [6, 12, 15, 16, 24, 2833].
A common misunderstanding among clinicians is that the swelling of a lymphedematous extremity, whether it is primary or secondary, is due purely to the accumulation of lymph and/or brosis. In one study, preoperative investigation with volume­rendered computed tomography (CT) images showed a signi­cant preoperative increase of adipose tissue in the swollen arm, the excess volume consisting of 81% (range, 68–96%) fat [15]. In another study, analyses with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) that were compared to plethysmography in 18 women with arm lymphedema following mastectomy showed a signi­cant increase of adipose tissue, 73% (range, 43–111%), in the non-pitting swollen arm before surgery [16]. Consecutive anal­yses of the content of the aspirate removed under bloodless con­ditions using a tourniquet showed a very high content of adipose
tissue in 105 women with postmastectomy arm lymphedema (mean, 94%; range, 58–100%) [6]. Lymph can be removed by the use of noninvasive conservative regimens such as complex decongestive therapy (CDT) and controlled compression ther­apy (CCT). These therapies work well when the excess swelling consists of accumulated lymph but do not work when the excess volume is dominated by adipose tissue [1, 2, 1519, 34]. The same may go for microsurgical procedures using lymphovenous shunts [35, 36], lymph vessel transplantation [37, 38], and vas­cularized lymph node transfer [39].
How toAssess theEcacy ofLiposuction
Today, chronic non-pitting arm lymphedema of more than 4L in excess can be effectively removed by the use of lipo­suction without any further reduction in lymph transport. Long-term results have not shown any recurrence of the arm swelling (Figs.20.1 and 20.2) [1, 2, 5, 6]. Promising results can also be achieved for primary and secondary leg lymph­edema, where over 6L in excess volume can be completely reduced (Figs.20.3, 20.4, and 20.5) [4, 40].
Preoperative Planning forArm Liposuction
Made-to-measure compression garments (three sleeves and two gloves) are ordered 2weeks before surgery. One gar­ment, to be put on the arm at the time of surgery, is sterilized and used for only 2days since it loses some of its pressure
a
b
Fig. 20.1 (a) A 74-year-old woman with non-pitting arm lymphedema
for 15years. Preoperative excess volume was 3090mL. (b) Postoperative result
Fig. 20.2 Mean
postoperative excess volume reduction in 95 women with arm lymphedema following breast cancer [52]
2000
1500
1000
500
0
–500
Preop. 2 w1 m3 m6 m1 y2 y3 y4 y5 y
6 y7 y8 y9 y 10 y 11 y 12 y 13 y
20 Step-by-Step Instruction: Suction-Assisted Lipectomy Procedure withControlled Compression Therapy
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 20.3 Preoperative
excess volume 5380mL (left). Postoperative result after 3years where excess volume is -255mL, i.e., the treated leg is somewhat smaller than the normal one (right)
143
Fig. 20.4 Preoperative
excess volume 6630mL (left). Postoperative result after 2years with complete reduction (right)
144
https://t.me/medicina_free
H. Brorson
Fig. 20.5 Primary lymphedema, excess volume 4940mL before liposuction (left). After liposuction up to the tourniquet (right)
by sterilization. The size of the garments is measured according to the size of the unaffected arm and hand. We always have standard interim gloves and gauntlets (a glove without ngers but with a thumb) in stock, used as described later. One interim glove is sterilized to be put on at the time of surgery. Liposuction is executed circumferentially, step by step, from hand to shoulder, and the hypertrophied fat is removed as much as possible (Figs.20.6, 20.7, 20.8, and
20.9).
Operative Technique (see supplementary material)
For the majority of patients, power-assisted liposuction (Lipomatic, Nutational Infrasonic Liposculpture, Euromi, Andrimont, Belgium) is performed to facilitate liposuction. Around ten 3- to 4-mm-long incisions are made, and liposuc-
tion is performed using 15- and 25-cm-long cannulas with diameters of 3 and 4mm. Initially, the hand was also treated, but since no fat could be aspirated, we ceased to treat this area. Circumferential liposuction is performed from wrist to shoulder and as much of the hypertrophied fat is removed as possible using previously measured circumferences of the healthy arm as a control (Figs.20.6, 20.7, and 20.8). When the arm distal to the tourniquet has been treated, a sterilized custom-made compression sleeve is applied (Jobst Elvarex, compression class 2) to the arm to minimize bleeding and reduce postoperative edema. A sterilized, standard interim glove (Cicatrex interim, Thuasne Begat, France) is put on the hand. The tourniquet is then removed, and the most proximal part of the upper arm is treated using the tumescent tech­nique, where 1000ml saline is mixed with 1mg adrenaline and 40ml lidocaine 2% [13, 5, 6]. The technique for legs (Figs. 20.3, 20.4, and 20.5) is similar to that for arms (Figs.20.6, 20.7, and 20.8).
20 Step-by-Step Instruction: Suction-Assisted Lipectomy Procedure withControlled Compression Therapy
https://t.me/medicina_free
145
Fig. 20.6 Liposuction of arm lymphedema. The procedure takes about 2hours. From preoperative to postoperative state (left to right). Note the
tourniquet, which has been removed on the right, and the concomitant reactive hyperemia
a b
Fig. 20.7 (a) Preoperative picture showing a patient with a large right
lymphedematous arm (2865mL excess volume) with decreased mobil­ity; (b) the cannula lifts the loose skin of the treated forearm (left); the
distal half of the forearm has been treated – note the sharp border between treated (distal forearm) and untreated (proximal arm) areas (right)
146
https://t.me/medicina_free
H. Brorson
Postoperative Care
Two days postoperatively, the garments are removed by the patient under supervision so that the patient can take a shower. The arm is lubricated with lotion. Then, the other set of garments are put on, and the used set is washed and dried. Change of garments is repeated by the patient after another 2 days before hospital discharge. The standard glove and gauntlet are usually changed to the made-to-measure glove at the end of the stay.
The patient alternates between the two sets of garments (two sleeves and two gloves) during the rst week at home, changing them every other day so that a clean set is always put on after showering and lubricating the arm. Then gar­ments are changed daily. Washing “activates” the garment by increasing the compression due to shrinkage. It also removes products of perspiration that can cause dry and irritated skin. During the subsequent course, this rigorous compression regime, referred to as CCT, is maintained exactly as described in the next section.
Fig. 20.8 The aspirate contains 90–100% adipose tissue in general.
This picture shows typical aspirates collected from a lymphedematous arm before removal of the tourniquet. The aspirate to the left sediments into an upper adipose fraction (90%) and a lower uid (lymph) fraction (10%). To the right, no uid fraction is seen
Fig. 20.9 The compression garment is removed 2days after surgery to
take measurements for a custom-made compression garment. A signi­cant reduction of the right arm has been achieved, as compared with the preoperative condition seen in Fig.20.7a
Complications
So far, no major complications have occurred. Skin numb­ness is normal after liposuction and disappears after a couple of weeks. No skin necrosis has occurred.
Controlled Compression Therapy (CCT)
A prerequisite to maintaining the effect of liposuction, and, for that matter, conservative treatment, is the lifelong, con­tinuous (24h/day) use of a compression garment [1, 2, 5, 6]. If the patient has any doubts about continued CCT, the patient is not accepted for treatment.
After initiating compression therapy, the custom-made garment may be taken in at each visit using a sewing machine to compensate for reduced elasticity and reduced arm vol­ume. This is most important during the rst 3months when the most notable changes in volume occur. At the 1- and 3-month visits, the arm is measured for new custom-made garments. This procedure is repeated at 6, 9, and 12months. If complete reduction has been achieved at 6months, the 9-month control may be omitted. If this is the case, it is important to remember to prescribe garments for 6months.
When the excess volume has decreased as much as pos­sible and a steady state is achieved, new garments can be prescribed using the latest measurements. In this way, the garments (two sets of sleeve and glove garments) are renewed three or four times during the rst year. The patient is informed about the importance of hygiene (daily shower with soap and water) and skin care (moisturizing the skin with lotion), as all patients with lymphedema are susceptible to infections [1, 2, 5, 6].
20 Step-by-Step Instruction: Suction-Assisted Lipectomy Procedure withControlled Compression Therapy
https://t.me/medicina_free
147
The lifespan of two garments worn alternately is usually 3–6months. After complete reduction has been achieved, the patient is seen once a year when new garments are prescribed for the coming year, usually four garments and four gloves (or four gauntlets). In active patients, six to eight garments and the same amount of gauntlets/gloves a year are needed.
For legs, it is often necessary to use up to two to three compression garments on top of each other, depending on what is needed to keep pitting away. The larger the diameter of the leg, the more compression is needed according to the law of Laplace. A typical example is Elvarex compression class 3, Elvarex compression class 2, and, when needed, Jobst Bellavar compression class 2. The Elvarex class 2 garment can be a leg-length or a below-the-knee garment. During night only one layer is used. Thus, such a patient needs two sets of two to three garments. It is important to take loose measurements at the ankle since the diameter here is small, giving more compression than needed. An alternative is to order a leg-length garment without the foot part of one of the garments. The follow-up regimen is the same as for arms. CCT can also be used primarily to effectively treat pitting edema as an alternative to CDT, which, in contrast to CCT, comprises daily interventions [1, 2].
patient compliance or worn-out garments. Also, one visit a year is economical as compared to conservative treatment, where patients are prescribed massage once a week and repeated maintenance therapies lasting 1–2weeks.
How Liposuction Helps
For many patients, conservative treatment does not work well or meet their expectations, and no matter what therapy they receive, neither conservative treatment nor microsurgi­cal procedures can remove excess adipose tissue [3439]. Subcutaneous tissue debulking is the only option to com­pletely reduce the limb excess volume leading to an improve­ment in the patient’s quality of life [13, 14]. In addition, data from a prospective study that evaluated 130 patients with postmastectomy lymphedema treated with liposuction showed that the incidence of erysipelas was reduced by 87% [41]. The mean incidence of pre-liposuction and post­liposuction erysipelas episodes was 0.47 attacks/year (±0.8) and 0.06 attacks/year (±0.3), respectively.
Lymph Transport System andLiposuction
Volume Measurements
Volumes are recorded for each patient using the water dis­placement technique. The displaced water is weighed on a balance to the nearest 5 g, corresponding to 5 mL. Both extremities are always measured at each visit, and the differ­ence in volumes is designated as the edema volume, or more correctly the excess volume. The decrease in the excess vol­ume is calculated in a percentage of the preoperative value [1, 2, 5, 6].
Lymphedema Team
To investigate and treat patients with lymphedema, a team comprising a plastic surgeon, an occupational therapist, and a physiotherapist is needed. An hour is reserved for each scheduled visit to the team when limb volumes are mea­sured, garments are adjusted or renewed, social circum­stances are assessed, and other matters of concern are discussed. The patient is also encouraged to contact the team whenever any unexpected problems arise so that these can be tackled without delay. The team also monitors the long-term outcome, and a visit once a year is necessary, in most cases, to maintain a good functional and cosmetic result after com­plete reduction.
This regimen omits any repeated “maintenance treat­ment,” since if the excess volume increases, it indicates less
To investigate the effect of liposuction on lymph transport, the author conducted an investigation using indirect lympho­scintigraphy in 20 patients with postmastectomy arm lymph­edema. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed before liposuction, with and without wearing a garment. This was repeated after 3 and 12months. In conclusion, it was found that the already decreased lymph transport was not further reduced after liposuction [42]. Eleven of our patients (6%) with arm lymphedema do not wear any compression. A recent study has shown that liposuction for lymphedema can improve lymph transport [43].
When toUse Liposuction toTreat Lymphedema
A surgical approach, with the intention of removing the hypertrophied adipose tissue, seems logical when conservative treatment has not achieved satisfactory excess volume reduction and the patient has subjective discomfort of a heavy arm.
Initially, lymphedema starts as a swelling that shows pits on pressure. If treated immediately by conservative regi­mens, the swelling can disappear. If not, or improperly treated, the swelling increases over time and can end up with even more severe pitting edema with concomitant adipose tissue formation. The rst and most important goal is to transform a limb with pitting edema into a non-pitting one by