Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5615_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •PEGylated Nanocarriers in Medicine and Pharmacy
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •About the Editors
- •Contributors
- •1.1.3.1 Passive Targeting Agent
- •1.1.3.2 Solubility Enhancers
- •1. PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
- •1.1 PEGylation
- •1.1.1 PEG Characteristics
- •1.2 PEGylation Determination
- •1.2.2.1 Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
- •1.2.2.2 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •1.2.2.4 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •1.3.1 Nanoparticulate System
- •1.3.1.1 Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
- •1.3.1.2 Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (NLCs)
- •1.3.1.3 Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2 Metal Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.1 Silver Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.2 Gold Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.3 Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
- •1.3.2.4 Copper Nanoparticles
- •1.3.3 Vesicular Systems
- •1.3.3.1 Liposomes
- •1.3.3.2 Niosomes
- •1.3.3.3 Ethosomes
- •1.4.1 Cancer
- •1.4.2 Gene Delivery
- •1.4.3 Diagnostics Imaging
- •1.4.4 Vaccines
- •1.4.5 Rheumatoid Arthritis
- •1.4.6 Hemophilia
- •1.4.7 Pain Therapy
- •1.4.8 Diabetes
- •1.4.9 Others
- •1.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •Nanoprecipitation (Solvent Diffusion)
- •Emulsification (Solvent Evaporation or Nanoemulsion)
- •Physical Adsorption Strategy
- •2.2.2.1 Pre-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.2.2.2 Post-Insertion PEGylation
- •2.3.1 Indirect Assessment (Qualitative Assessment)
- •2.3.1.1 Particle Size
- •2.3.1.2 Zeta Potential
- •2.3.1.3 Surface Hydrophilicity
- •2.3.1.4 Microscopic Techniques
- •2.3.1.5 Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •2.3.2 Direct Assessment (Quantitative Assessment)
- •2.3.2.1 Colorimetric Methods
- •2.3.2.2 Chromatographic Methods
- •2.3.2.4 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •2.3.2.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Characterization Techniques
- •3.3 Infrared Spectroscopy
- •3.4 Raman Spectroscopy
- •3.5 X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
- •3.6 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
- •3.7 Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
- •3.8 Mass Spectroscopy (MS)
- •3.9 Thermogravimetric Analysis
- •3.10 Differential Scanning Calorimetry
- •3.11 Atomic Force Microscopy
- •3.12 Scanning Electron Microscopy
- •3.13 Transmission Electron Microscopy
- •3.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.3.1 Nanoparticles PEGylation
- •4.3.2 Polyplexes (PP) PEGylation
- •4.5.1 Systemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2 Nonsystemic Drug Delivery
- •4.5.2.3 PEGylated Intravaginal Nanocarriers
- •4.5.2.6 Vaccines Entrapped PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •4.6.2 PEG Molecular Weight (MW)
- •4.7 PEGylated Nanocarriers Products
- •4.8.3 Disadvantageous Physicochemical Properties
- •4.8.5 Limited RES Evasion Capacity
- •4.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.2 PEG Solubility Characteristics
- •5.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Small Molecule Drugs
- •5.3 Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.3.2 Organic Solvent–Soluble PEGylated Proteins/Enzymes
- •5.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.4.1 Water-Soluble PEGylated Silicon Nanocarriers
- •5.4.2 Water-Soluble PEGylated Carbon Nanotubes
- •5.4.4 Water-Soluble PEGylated Dendrimers
- •5.4.5 Water-Soluble PEGylated Polymeric Micelles
- •5.5 Hydrated or Hydrophilic PEGylated Drug Nanocarriers
- •5.5.1 Hydrated PEGylated Lipid Nanocarriers
- •5.5.2 Hydrophilic PEG-Coated Zein Nanocarriers
- •References
- •5.6.4.1 PEG Chain Length/Molecular Weight
- •6.1 Introduction
- •Increased Solubility
- •Improved Stability
- •Reduced Immunogenicity
- •Enhanced Circulation Time
- •Heterogeneity
- •6.3.1 Enhancing Immune Responses
- •6.3.2 Suppressing Immune Responses
- •6.3.3 Immune Evasion
- •6.4.1 Strategies to Overcome Immunological Barriers
- •6.4.1.1 PEGylation
- •6.4.1.2 Cell Membranes
- •6.4.1.3 Carbohydrates
- •6.4.1.4 Proteins
- •6.6.1 Cancer Therapy
- •6.6.2 Gene Therapy
- •6.6.3 Immunotherapy
- •6.6.4 Central Nervous System (CNS) Drug Delivery
- •6.6.5 Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- •6.6.6 Ocular Drug Delivery
- •6.6.7 Cardiovascular (CVS) Drug Delivery
- •6.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.3 Nanocarrier-Based Targeted Drug Delivery
- •7.4.1 Covalent Approach
- •7.4.2 Non-covalent Approach
- •7.4.2.1 PEGylation Via Monovalent Interactions
- •High-Affinity Host-Guest Interactions
- •7.4.2.2 PEGylation Via Multivalent Interactions
- •PEGylated Block Copolymers
- •PEGylated Graft Copolymers
- •Polyelectrolyte Complex-Based Systems
- •Non-ionic Interaction-Based Systems
- •PEGylated Dendritic Copolymers
- •PEGylated Copolymers Utilizing Mobile Side Groups
- •7.5 Various Targeting Strategies
- •7.5.1 Active Targeting
- •7.5.2 Passive Targeting
- •7.5.2.1 PEG Dilemma
- •7.7.1 Brain Disorders
- •7.7.2 Pulmonary Disorders
- •7.7.3 Cancer
- •7.7.4 Inflammatory Disorders
- •7.7.5 Bone Disorders
- •7.7.6 Blood Disorders
- •7.8 Stimuli-Sensitive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1 External-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.1 Ultrasound-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.2 Thermal-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.1.3 Magnetic Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2 Internal-Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.8.2.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.2.4 Hypoxia-Responsive Systems
- •7.8.3 Multimodal Responsive Nanocarriers
- •7.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3.1 PEGylated Liposome
- •8.3.2 PEGylated Micelles
- •8.3.3 PEGylated Nanogels
- •8.3.4 PEGylated Inorganic Nanoparticles
- •8.3.5 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •8.4.1 Cancer
- •8.4.1.1 Breast Cancer
- •8.4.1.2 Lung Cancer
- •8.4.1.3 Colon Cancer
- •8.4.1.4 Brain Cancer
- •8.4.2 Autoimmune Diseases
- •8.4.3 Inflammatory Disorders
- •8.4.4 Cardiovascular Diseases
- •8.4.5 Ocular Diseases
- •8.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.4.1.1 Amino Acid Modifications
- •9.4.1.3 Cysteine Thiol Residue Conjugation
- •9.4.2 Releasable PEGs
- •9.7.1.1 Cationic Lipid Toxicology
- •9.8 RNA Lipid Nanoparticle
- •9.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.2.1 PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •10.2.1.1 Polymeric NPs
- •10.2.1.2 Liposomes
- •10.2.1.3 Dendrimers
- •10.2.1.4 Polymeric Micelles
- •10.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Factors Influencing PPDs’ Short-Term Efficiency
- •11.2 What Is PEGylation?
- •11.3.1 Random PEGylation
- •11.3.2 Site-Specific PEGylation
- •11.3.2.1 Amine Conjugation
- •11.3.2.2 Cysteine Conjugation
- •11.4.1 Binding Affinity
- •11.4.2 Altered Biological Activity
- •11.4.3 Physicochemical Modifications
- •11.4.4 PEG Size
- •11.4.5 PEG Structure
- •11.6 PK Profiling
- •11.9 FDA-Approved PEGylated Products
- •11.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.1.2 Current Market Scenario
- •12.2.1 PEGylated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2.1 PEGylated Lipid-Based NPs
- •13.2.2 PEGylated Polymeric Nanoparticles
- •13.2.3 PEGylated Metal-Based Nanoparticles
- •13.2.4 Multifunctional PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.2.5 Targeted PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •13.3.1 Surface Modification Chemistry
- •13.3.2 Polymer Chemistry
- •13.3.4 Characterization Techniques
- •13.4.1 Longer Circulation Time
- •13.4.2 Enhanced Cellular Uptake
- •13.4.3 Controlled Drug Release
- •13.5.1 Cancer Theragnostic
- •13.5.2 Cardiovascular Theragnostic
- •13.7.2 Prolonged Circulation Time
- •13.7.3 Improved Drug Delivery
- •13.7.4 Diagnostic Functionality
- •13.8 Technical Challenges
- •13.8.4 Limited Clinical Validation
- •13.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Reversible PEGylation Strategies
- •14.2.1 Reversible PEGylation Chemistry
- •14.2.2.1 Aromatic Linkers
- •14.2.2.2 Aliphatic Linkers
- •14.2.3 Cleavage Linkers
- •14.2.3.1 Hydrolyzable Linkers
- •14.2.3.2 Enzymatically Cleavable Linkers
- •14.2.4 pH-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.4.1 Proteasome Inhibitor MG132
- •14.2.5 Temperature-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.2.6 Light-Responsive PEGylation
- •14.3.1 Analytical Techniques
- •Zeta Potential
- •Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC)
- •Near Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy
- •Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
- •13C-NMR
- •Mass Spectrometry
- •High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
- •Calorimetry
- •X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
- •Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
- •TGA-DSC
- •14.3.2.1 Protein Adsorption
- •14.3.2.2 Cellular Association
- •14.3.2.5 Bioactivity Assay
- •14.3.2.6 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
- •14.3.2.7 Sandwich ELISA
- •14.3.2.8 Anti-PEG ELISA
- •14.3.3.1 In Vivo Blood Circulation Half-Life
- •14.3.3.2 Radiolabeling
- •14.4.1 Therapeutic Applications
- •14.4.1.1 Anticancer Activity
- •14.4.1.2 Antibiotic Administration
- •14.4.1.3 Enzyme-Replacement Therapy
- •14.4.1.4 Red Blood Cell Substitution
- •14.4.1.5 Oxygen Toxicity Diseases
- •14.4.2 Pharmaceutical Applications
- •14.4.2.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •14.4.2.2 PEGylated Proteins
- •14.4.2.3 Targeted Delivery
- •14.5.1 Design Complexity
- •14.5.3 Biological Environment Stability
- •14.5.4 Trigger Selection
- •14.5.5 Immunogenicity
- •14.5.6 Scale-up Difficulties
- •14.5.8 Cost
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15. Stimuli-Responsive PEGylated Nanocarriers
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 External Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.2.1 Thermoresponsive Systems
- •15.2.2 Magnetically Responsive Systems
- •15.2.3 Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.4 Light-Triggered Drug Delivery
- •15.2.5 Electroresponsive Systems
- •15.3 Internal Stimuli-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.1 pH-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.2 Redox-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.3 Enzyme-Responsive Systems
- •15.3.4 Self-Regulated Systems
- •15.4.3 Multistimuli Responsive Systems
- •15.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 PEGylated Products
- •16.3.1 PEGylated Liposomes
- •16.3.2 PEGylated G-CSF
- •16.3.3 PEGylated Proteins
- •16.3.4 PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.5.1 Poly(Zwitterions)
- •16.5.2 Poly(Glycerols)
- •16.5.3 Poly(Amino Acids)
- •16.5.4 Poly(Oxazolines)
- •16.5.6 Poly(Vinylpyrrolidones)
- •16.5.8 Polypeptides
- •16.5.9 Carbohydrate-Based Systems
- •16.5.10 Hydrophilic Polymers
- •16.5.11 Non-PEGylated Nanoparticles
- •16.6 Future Prospects
- •16.7 Conclusion
- •References

xii
Editors and Contributors
Salome A. Chime Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Industrial
Pharmacy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
VaishnaviChinkure National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp.
Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Dwiptesha Dahake Department of Pharmaceuticals, National Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Ahmedabad, An Institute of
National Importance, Government of India, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers,
Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
PranKishoreDeb Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Birla
Institute of Technology (BIT), Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
VinodGaikwad Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, Bihar, India
SanyamGandhi Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
Shyam Sudhakar Gomte Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar,
Gujarat, India
Sourajyoti Goswami Department of Pharmacy, Indira Gandhi National Tribal
University, Amarkantak, Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh, India
NaveenGupta Patel Institute of Pharmacy, Madhyanchal Professional University,
Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
SajidulHoque Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, Bihar, India
Aakanchha Jain Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar,
Gujarat, India
HeetJani National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)
Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department
of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force
station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
MeghaJoshi PHC, Amarkantak, Amarkantak, Madhya Pradesh, India
Ceyda Oksel Karakus Department of Bioengineering, Izmir Institute of
Technology, Izmir, Turkey
Gagandeep Kaur National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp.
Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

Editors and Contributors
xiii
Simranjit Kaur National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp.
Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
SatyamKhare Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, ISF College of
Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, India
LakshmiKumari Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, ISF College
of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, India
BalakDasKurmi Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, ISF College
of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, India
Department of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, India
NiyatiLad National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)
Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India, Department
of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp. Air force
station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
ThiagarajanMadheswaran Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, School
of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Randa S. H. Mansour Faculty of Pharmacy, Philadelphia University,
Amman, Jordan
Seyedeh Zohreh Mirjalili Faculty of Pharmacy, Drug and Food Control
Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AnkitMishra Faculty of Pharmacy, VNS Group of Institutions, Neelbad, Bhopal,
MP, India
VNS Group of Institutions, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Lopamudra Mishra Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, ISF
College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, India
Mahima Mishra National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp.
Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Pranali Mishra Faculty of Pharmacy, VNS Group of Institutions, Neelbad,
Bhopal, MP, India
Sehasree Mohanta School of Biological Sciences, Indian Association for the
Cultivation of Science, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Mumuni A. Momoh Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Nigeria,
Nsukka, Nigeria

xiv
Editors and Contributors
Shubham Ramdas Mule National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and
Research (NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government
of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers,
Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
AnujaMuley Department of Pharmaceuticals, National Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research (NIPER), Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance,
Government of India, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opposite Air
Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Sreeharsha Nagaraja Department of Pharmaceutics, Vidya Siri College of
Pharmacy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal
University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
PrasanthiSriNaginderaRao Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, School
of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Aniket Navale National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp.
Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
PiyushNeware Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, Bihar, India
Shivam Otavi National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Gandhinagar,
Gujarat, India
PreetiPatel Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, ISF College of Pharmacy,
Moga, Punjab, India
VasuPeddinti Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Prashant Pingale Department of Pharmaceutics, GES’s Sir Dr. M.S. Gosavi
College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
Aprameya Prasad Drug Product Development and Delivery, Therapeutics
Development and Supply, Janssen Research and Development, Malvern, PA, USA
Aprameya Ganesh Prasad Department of Chemical and Biomolecular
Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
AmarjitsingRajput Department of Pharmaceutics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed
to be University, Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune, Maharashtra, India
V. Ravichandiran National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER), Hajipur, Bihar, India

Editors and Contributors
xv
BiswajitRout Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research (NIPER)-Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
MalihehSafavi Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for
Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Sombir Saharan Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, Bihar, India
Rakesh Sahu Sanjivani Institute of Pharmacy, Ganiyari, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh, India
Sweety Shah National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
(NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government of India,
Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Palaj, Opp.
Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
RahelehShakeri Faculty of Science, Department of Biological Science, University
of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
Yash Sharma Department of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga,
Punjab, India
DilpreetSingh University Institute of Pharma Sciences, Chandigarh University,
Gharuan, Mohali, India
PranaySoni Department of Pharmacy, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University,
Amarkantak, Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Muktika Tekade School of Pharmacy, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Takshila
Campus, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara,
Punjab, India
Rakesh Kumar Tekade National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and
Research (NIPER) Ahmedabad, An Institute of National Importance, Government
of India, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers,
Palaj, Opp. Air force station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
Akhilesh Tiwari Department of Pharmacy, Indira Gandhi National Tribal
University, Amarkantak, Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Mansi Upadhyay Department of Pharmaceuticals, National Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Ahmedabad, An Institute of
National Importance, Government of India, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers,
Palaj, Opposite Air Force Station, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
SakshiWani Department of Pharmaceutics, GES’s Sir Dr. M.S.Gosavi College of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
PrashantPingale, SakshiWani, SahebraoBoraste,
andAmarjitsingRajput
Abstract
Bioactive compounds benet signicantly from PEGylation in both pharmacological and biological applications. The most popular technique for giving drug
nanocarriers stealth characteristics is now “PEGylation.” Target-site drug delivery systems are becoming more popular in the pharmaceutical industry because
of their many benets, including greater bioavailability and increased drug dosage capacity. However, specic current issues must be resolved. The interplay
between drug delivery systems and blood proteins serves as one example. Based
on alterations to the polyethylene glycol surface, this problem has a strong candidate. The most well-known and complex technique to create drug delivery systems with an extended blood circulation period is the surface coating of different
medicinal nanocarriers with polyethylene glycol. For drug-loaded nanocarriers
to effectively accumulate in target organs or tissues, prolonged circulation is
often necessary. Targeted distribution is made possible by polyethylene glycol’s
protection against potential exterior interactions with other chemicals. These
innovative methods can help cure diseases like cancer, diabetes, hemophilia, and
pain. This research examines key polyethylene glycol and other polymer characteristics that can be leveraged to create long-circulating nanocarriers. This review
also includes descriptions of PEGylated liposomes, metal nanoparticles, poly-
1
P. Pingale · S. Wani · S. Boraste
Department of Pharmaceutics, GES’s Sir Dr. M.S. Gosavi College of Pharmaceutical
Education and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
A. Rajput (*)
Department of Pharmaceutics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University,
Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune, Maharashtra, India
e-mail: amarjit.rajput@bharatividyapeeth.edu

2
P. Pingale et al.
meric nanoparticles, and other drug delivery systems. This strategy is expected
to offer more viable and valuable applications soon.
Keywords
PEGylation · PEGylated nanocarriers · Drug delivery · PEG products · PEG density · Targeting · Toxicity
Abbreviations
BCS Biopharmaceutical classication system
CAC Critical aggregation concentration
CuNPs Copper nanoparticles
DA Diabetes
DEX Dexamethasone
DNR Daunorubicin
DOX Doxorubicin
DSPE 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-ethanolamine
EPR Enhanced permeation and retention
GA Gambogic acid
GDH Glutamate dehydrogenase
LSPR Localized surface plasmon resonance
mPEG Mono-methoxylated PEG
MPS Mononuclear phagocyte system
NLCs Nanostructured lipid carriers
NLS Localization signal peptide
NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance
PEG Polyethylene glycol
PEI Polyethyleneimine
PLA Polylactic lactic acid
PLGA Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)
RGD Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide
SARs Structural activity relationships
SCID Severe combined immunodeciency disease
SLNs Solid lipid nanoparticles
SMEDDS Self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system
SPIO Superparamagnetic iron oxide
Tf Transferrin
TfR Transferrin receptor
TGA Thermogravimetric analysis
TiO2 Titanium dioxide
TMZ Demozolomide
VEGF Pegylated anti-vascular endothelial growth factor
XPS X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

1 PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
3
1.1 PEGylation
A peptide, protein, or nonpeptide monomer is modied when one or more polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains are joined. Davies and Abuchowsky initially discussed
PEGylation in two critical articles on albumin and catalase modication in the
1970s. This was a signicant turning point since, at the time, it was not thought possible to signicantly alter an enzyme while maintaining its activity. Since proteins
were considered susceptible, only a few mild changes with low-molecular-weight
products were made, mainly to study structural activity relationships (SARs). Since
then, the initially stated PEGylation process has dramatically grown and improved,
and various chemical and enzymatic conjugation methods are now available. The
range of modication techniques provides the possibility of addressing the needs of
various proteins. Only the desired amino acids in the sequence can be modied
using a more reactive PEG.The original PEG targets were amino groups via acylation or alkylation reactions. Still, PEG can also be conjugated to thiol, hydroxyl, or
amide groups utilizing a variety of specialized chemical or enzymatic techniques.
This polymer is safe, immunogenic, and antigenic and has FDA approval. It is also
highly soluble in water. The PEG-drug conjugates have many benets, including an
extended residence in the body, a reduced rate of metabolic enzyme breakdown, and
a decreased or eliminated level of protein immunogenicity (Thakur etal. 2015).
Monomeric ethylene oxide undergoes ring-opening polymerization and produces PEG. Water may begin the polymerization reaction, producing chains of
bifunctional polymers, or methanol can produce monofunctional PEG.When connecting two proteins, monofunctional PEG is usually used to avoid utilizing a similar polymer chain again. Mono-methoxylated PEG (mPEG), generated through
methanol initiation, is widely used as the starting material for PEGylating proteins.
However, some dihydroxyl PEG (a bifunctional polymer) is usually present, which
results in undesirable crosslinked products. To avoid the cross-linking reaction, a
method was created by Roberts etal. to change diols into completely methylated
inert PEG (Zhao etal. 2019). For protein conjugation, the free hydroxyl end group
on mPEG is functionalized (Rondon etal. 2021).
1.1.1 PEG Characteristics
The hydrophilic oligomers or polymers known as polyethylene glycols are created
from ethylene oxide and include the repeating unit (O-CH2-CH2). PEGs are made
with many different molecular weights. They can be “polydispersed” polymers,
which are more common, or “monodispersed” polymers, which have a Gaussian
distribution of chain lengths and molecular weights. The advantages of PEG polymers have been substantially increased by the capability to add a range of reactive
functional groups to their terminal locations. Bifunctional PEGs are best suited for
cross-linking agents or spacers between two chemical entities. In contrast, heteroand homo-bifunctional PEG derivatives are particularly suited for single-point
attachment to targets due to their sterically bulky structure (Nascimento etal. 2021).

4
P. Pingale et al.
PEG is well known for having a very exible structure, biocompatible, amphiphilic, no steric hindrance, and high hydration capacity. PEGs with MW >2000
are hard crystalline solids with melting temperatures around 63°C, while those
with MW between 100 and 700 are liquids at ambient temperature. PEGs with a
molecular mass of 1000–2000 are soft solids. PEG stands out among structural
polymers with a similar structure due to its high polarity, which encourages
hydrophilicity and enhances water solubility. PEG is highly soluble in both
organic and inorganic solvents. The contact angle is a signicant determinant of
hydrophilicity. PEG- coated glass and gold plates can both lower the contact angle
by 34° and 50°, respectively. According to research by Moore and colleagues,
PEG is hydrophilic and includes functional terminals that are electrically neutral
and active at all pH levels, making them physiologically inert (WalkowiakKulikowska etal. 2020).
This imparts an invivo anti-biofouling effect on biomedical and bone scaffolds,
whereas, in nanoparticles, it enhances medication targeting and bioavailability in
addition to anti-biofouling. The glass transition temperature and melting point can
be altered by copolymerizing or mixing with the PEG of various MWs. Its mechanical qualities are based on its plasticizing process. PEGs with low melting points are
essential in hot melt extruded admixtures. Different molecular engineering
approaches are feasible because PEGs have limited chemical and radiochemical
stability. PEGs are the ideal excipient for liquid dosage forms since they prevent
fungus growth and do not develop bad odors. For cutaneous applications, ingredients with good occlusive qualities are chosen (Sánchez-Cid etal. 2022).
1.1.2 PEG Metabolism intheBody
Early research on PEG’s aerobic degradation suggested that the process must
involve oxidation. After PEG is rst oxidized to an aldehyde and a monocarboxylic
acid, the ether bond is broken, shortening the PEG molecule by one glycol unit. It is
also feasible for the molecule’s two terminal alcohol groups to oxidize simultaneously. A similar reaction with the monocarboxylic acid might be used to depolymerize. When this process is repeated, depolymerized PEG is the result. An alcohol
dehydrogenase/oxidase is an enzyme that changes terminal alcohol groups into carboxylic acid groups and splits ether bonds to produce glyoxylate. PEG-glycolic acid
is the best molecule to employ because it is a metabolite of PEG.Because monoalkyl PEG was used but not dialkyl PEG, it is possible that a terminal alcohol group
is a component that causes PEG to break down exogenously. PEG degradation of a
polymer molecule produces depolymerized chemicals, while exogenous breakdown
cannot. PPG and PTMG are both harmful to developing cultures. As a result, exogenous biodegradation begins with a terminal group and solely depends on the chemical makeup of the monomer units (Rondon etal. 2021).
Pearce and Heydeman suggested a nonoxidative elimination of PEG units as
acetaldehyde utilizing the membrane-bound, new oxygen-sensitive enzyme
diPEGlyase. In contrast, Haines and Alexander suggested that an enzyme may

1 PEGylated Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
5
digest PEG 20,000 to create oligomers as metabolic products. Only cyanocobalamin and adenosylcobalamin accelerated the process among the cofactors examined, albeit the effect differed between preparations. These authors evaluated the
incubation mixture’s enzyme activity using vapor-phase chromatography. However,
measuring chemicals when unknown metabolizable materials are present is dangerous. Schöberl was the rst to propose that a C1 step catabolizes PEG, releasing
formate, which is metabolized by a serine pathway. He then changed his mind
about the C1 theory, noting that dimer–tetramer interactions produced dicarboxy
products, showing that an ether bond was broken to release glycolic acid (Kawai
2005; Simone 2008).
1.1.3 Pharmaceutical Uses ofPEG
Pharmaceutical formulations for parenteral, topical, ocular, oral, and rectal delivery use PEGs, which have also been explored in controlled-release devices with
biodegradable polymeric matrices. Polyethylene glycol mixtures have various
advantages over lipids when employed as suppository bases. For instance, the suppository’s melting point can be increased to endure exposure to warmer regions.
Furthermore, the physical stability of the suppository during storage is improved,
the drug’s release is not dependent on the suppository’s melting point, and suppositories are readily miscible with rectal uids. It was hypothesized and reported that
the dimer tetramer yielded dicarboxy products, indicating that an ether bond was
broken to release glycolic acid. The amount of release of drugs that are water soluble decreases as the molecular weight of polyethylene glycol increases. Mucous
membranes are often more irritated by polyethylene glycols than by lipids (Ciolacu
etal. 2020).
Polyethylene glycols can function as emulsion stabilizers when combined with
other emulsiers. Soft gelatin capsules’ contents are dissolved in liquid polyethylene glycols that are water soluble. They could, however, cause the gelatin in the
capsule shell to harden by absorbing moisture from it. PEG 300 and PEG 400 facilitate parenteral dosage forms in up to 30% v/v concentrations. If agitates the material
while it cools, it turns paste-like and crystallizes into granules. The preparation of
dosage forms like lozenges can be done using this technique when delayed disintegration is necessary (D’souza and Shegokar 2016). Polyethylene glycols having a
molecular weight of 6000 can be used to improve permeability in enteric-coated
tablets. Polyethylene glycols are used as plasticizers to prevent from rupturing when
compressed into tablets. PEGs can improve the water solubility or dissolving properties of poorly soluble substances by creating solid dispersions with the right polyethylene glycol. As steroid osmotic pump solvents, polyethylene glycols have also
been used in animal investigations (Saikh 2021).
1.1.3.1 Passive Targeting Agent
As a result of the medication’s high concentration in the tumor area, the passive
targeted drug delivery strategy mainly relies on the gradient in concentration

6
P. Pingale et al.
between the intracellular and extracellular spaces. Through leaky vasculature and
inadequate lymphatic drainage, PEG conjugates benet from the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect carried out by tumors and accumulate in the pathophysiological milieu of tumor arteries. The size-dependent effect cannot be explored
with low molecular weight medicines that freely extravasate and cause systemic
toxicity. PEGylation enhances the medications’ solubility, molecular mass, size,
and serum stability. PEGylation is regarded as one of the most excellent techniques
for passive targeting of anti-cancer treatments for all these reasons (Yadav and
Dewangan 2021).
1.1.3.2 Solubility Enhancers
Due to their low water solubility, biopharmaceutical classication system (BCS)
classes 2 and 4 have minimal bioavailability. Physical and chemical alterations,
particle size reduction, the creation of nanoemulsions, cyclodextrin inclusion
complexes, self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS), and micellar solubilization are all methods for enhancing solubilization and penetration.
These technologies need the appropriate concentrations of raw materials, nancial resources, and expertise in technology. Another problem is that these formulations are unstable at large dilutions. It exhibits a level of solubility in both
organic and inorganic solvents. Because water’s strong lattice structure prevents
hydrophobic pharmaceuticals from doing so, co-solvents like PEG make it easier
for medications to dissolve by reducing the solvent system’s polarity (Bhalani
etal. 2022).
PEG 300 and 400 are allowed in parenteral up to 30% v/v. High MW PEGs are
frequently utilized to microencapsulate active pharmaceutical ingredients. PEGs
reduce the use of strong solvents throughout encapsulation. PEG is a lubricant that
is used in eye drops. PEG is a perfect excipient for liquid dosage forms since it
resists rancidity and mold growth. PEGs in liquid form (MW up to 1000) are typically utilized as emulsion stabilizers and suspending agents in conjunction with
other stabilizers. Additionally, it serves as a solubilizer for liquid-lled soft gelatin
capsules or drops (for ophthalmic or otic treatments) (Pham Le Khanh etal. 2022).
The use of micellar solubilization frequently achieves hydrophobic medication
solubilization. The surfactant increases the wetting of solids by rst lowering surface tension. Micelles then develop above the CMC, encasing the medication and
improving its solubilization. PEG and hydrophobic polymers like PLGA, poly
amino acids, and PCL can easily self-assemble to generate nanoscale core-shell
structures that resemble micellar structures. These nanoscale structures make hydrophobic moieties, such as those found in medicines, proteins, peptides, and genes,
more soluble. It is generally known that macromolecular co-polymers have a critical
aggregation concentration (CAC), below which the co-polymers exist as unimers.
As the overall concentration increases to a level equivalent to the CAC value, aggregates of micellar-like structures begin to grow. Over CAC, they generate micellar
structures with a typical core shell. These thermodynamically stable molecules can
facilitate the solubilization of hydrophobic medicines. The PEG shell’s presence
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
