Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1114_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
C linical M anagement .......................................................................................................................... 69
encouraging results of this operation have not been sus­tained over time.
C
HRONIC ANEMIA
Iron-deficiency anemia commonly occurs several years after gastrectomy, but it can also develop following truncal vagotomy. The causes may include chronic occult blood loss from gastritis and poor absorption of dietary iron. Megaloblastic anemia, due to vitamin B
12
deficiency, may be seen after radical gastrec­tomy, indicating insufficient secretion of intrinsic factor. It can be successfully treated with monthly vitamin B
12
administration parenterally.
M
ALABSORPTION Postgastrectomy patients often
undergo weight loss and sometimes show signs of malab­sorption of fat, carbohydrates, vitamins, and metals. Mild steatorrhea tends to occur after Bilroth II gastrectomy. Vitamin deficiencies may be related to blind-loop syn­drome. Lactose intolerance is unmasked in patients who have a mild preoperative lactase deficiency. A significant long-term complication of gastric surgery is calcium malabsorption, which over years may lead to osteoporosis, particularly in women.
P
OSTGASTRECTOMY CARCINOMA
A higher incidence of carcinoma of the stomach is seen in patients who had gas­trectomy 20 years or more previously.
9
The cause is unknown but may be related to hypoacidity favoring bacterial overgrowth and a generation of carcinogenic nitrosamines from food.
NON-PEPTIC ULCER CAUSES OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING
Peptic ulcer and erosive gastritis are the most common causes of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, accounting for 85% of cases. But upper gastrointestinal bleeding may also be caused by lesions of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum other than peptic ulcer or erosive gastritis.
Esophageal Causes
Esophageal Varices
Esophageal varices represent the most important cause of bleeding from the esophagus. Portal hypertension and esophageal varices are covered more fully in later chapters. Suffice it to say here that esophageal varices must be excluded whenever upper GI hemorrhage is encountered. A history of alcoholism, cirrhosis, or hepatitis is sugges­tive. The presence of jaundice and other stigmata of chronic liver disease (e.g., spider nevi, palmar erythema, gynecomastia, hepatosplenomegaly, dilated collateral veins around the umbilicus or caput medusae, ascites, testicular atrophy, and encephalopathy) make the diagnosis of variceal hemorrhage more likely, but do not prove it. Only
upper GI endoscopy can verify that esophageal varices are present and that they are the source of bleeding. As many as 30% to 40% of patients with proven esophageal varices may bleed from another source, most commonly a peptic ulcer or erosive gastritis. The management of variceal hemorrhage is discussed in Chapter 6.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause bleed­ing, either from erosive esophagitis or from development of Barrett’s ulcer. Bleeding from erosive esophagitis can be significant but is rarely massive unless a coagulopathy coexists. Bleeding from a Barrett’s ulcer, on the other hand, can be massive. The cause is development of a typical peptic ulcer in Barrett’s epithelium in the esophagus. Both conditions are nearly always associated with a sliding hiatal hernia. The topic is covered in more detail in Chapter 1.
Paraesophageal Hernia
The cause of bleeding in paraesophageal hernia is almost always venous congestion of the mucosa caused by mechanical obstruction of venous outflow from the her­niated segment of the esophagus. Bleeding tends to be slow but is occasionally severe enough to present as hemateme­sis and/or melena. The treatment is surgical correction of the hernia.
Miscellaneous Causes
Malignancy and aortoesophageal fistula are rare causes of bleeding. Bleeding from aortoesophageal fistula can be exsanguinating and must always be suspected in the patient who has had an aortofemoral graft.
Non-Peptic Causes of Gastric Bleeding
Mallory–Weiss Syndrome
A mucosal tear at the gastroesophageal junction can lead to arterial bleeding at the base of the tear. The cause is usually mechanical and precipitated by retching and vomiting. The patient usually indicates that he or she had retched repeatedly or vomited non-blood–containing fluid before vomiting blood. The diagnosis is made with endoscopy, and the bleeding can usually be controlled with endoscopic coagulation. If endoscopic control fails, the bleeding is readily controlled surgically using an abdominal approach. The gastroesophageal junction is mobilized and a gastrotomy is performed adjacent to the gastroesophageal junction. Brisk arterial bleeding is seen coming from the base of a mucosal tear that usually straddles the gastroesophageal junction. The bleeder is under-sewn using 00-silk sutures.
70 ..................................................................................................................... Stomach and Duodenum
Dieulafoy Syndrome
Dieulafoy syndrome involves bleeding through apparently normal gastric mucosa from localized angiodysplasia in the submucosa. The bleeding is from a single vessel and is easily controlled by endoscopic injection of adrenaline around the site of bleeding.
Gastric Tumors
Benign or malignant tumors of the stomach occasionally cause upper GI bleeding. These include both mesenchy­mal tumors (leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma) and epithe­lial tumors (adenocarcinoma and carcinoma).
Hemangioma
Gastric hemangiomas can be single or multiple and may occur as isolated gastric lesions or as hemangiomatosis syndromes that affect other parts of the gastrointestinal tract.
Gastric Varices
Gastric varices are most commonly associated with splenic vein thrombosis. Although nonsurgical techniques may control the bleeding temporarily, the definitive treatment is splenectomy. Acutely bleeding varices may require suture control via gastrotomy prior to splenectomy.
Duodenal Causes
Non-peptic ulcer bleeding from the duodenum is rare and is associated with pancreatic tumors that have eroded into the organ.
Liver and Pancreas Causes
Liver and pancreas are exceedingly rare causes of upper GI bleeding and are considered when all other causes are excluded. There may be bleeding into the bile ducts or pancreatic duct and then into the duodenum through the ampulla of Vater. When the liver is the source, hepatic trauma is the usual cause, and bleeding originates from branches of the hepatic artery. The bleeding site may be identified angiographically and controlled by angio­graphic embolization. Bleeding into the pancreatic duct is exceedingly rare and may result from either trauma or acute pancreatitis.
Small Intestinal Causes
Upper GI bleeding caused by lesions in the small intestine is discussed in Chapter 8. The three important causes are Meckel’s diverticulum, tumors, and hemangioma. Bleed­ing distal to the ligament of Treitz does not present as hematemesis but as rectal bleeding or melena.
MOTOR DISORDERS OF THE STOMACH
Gastroparesis
Gastroparesis represents one of the most difficult man­agement problems in gastroenterology. Patients are usually referred for surgical opinion when all forms of medical therapy have failed. Many of these patients have had pre­vious ulcer surgery.
Nonsurgical Management
Medical treatment for motor disorders of the stomach includes the administration of dopamine antagonists, cholinergic agonists, or acetylcholine releasers to improve gastric emptying. Metoclopramide, domperidone, and cis­apride may improve gastric emptying, but in true gastro­paresis, and particularly in patients who have had previous ulcer surgery, the effectiveness of these drugs is neither impressive nor long-lived.
Surgical Management
Gastroparesis presents a special challenge, as the surgeon is being asked to perform a major operation with an uncertain outcome. On the other hand, extensive experi­ence now exists to suggest that total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy is the best surgical option. When this operation is performed, a feeding jejunostomy should be provided because the patient may require a long adaptive phase to learn to eat without a stomach.
Dumping Syndrome
The syndrome has been described above. Fortunately, most cases are mild. When the syndrome is severe, however, no adequate treatment exists. Hence, prevention is important.
Prevention
The best way to prevent dumping syndrome is to avoid, whenever possible, performing operations that are likely to cause it, including gastrectomy and truncal vagotomy and drainage. Pharmacologic and bacteriologic advances have nearly eliminated the need for elective ulcer surgery. In an emergency situation, the surgeon must decide whether to perform the quickest and safest operation at that moment as opposed to a lengthier operation with less undesirable side effects. Whenever the condition of the patient allows, particularly in young patients and women, PGV is a better choice than truncal vagotomy and drainage. In the setting of hemorrhage, control of bleed­ing is accomplished through duodenotomy, leaving the pyloric sphincter intact. When perforation is the indica-
C linical M anagement .......................................................................................................................... 71
tion for emergent surgery, PGV is again preferred if an acid-reducing procedure is to be done.
Nonsurgical Management
Dietary measures often effectively control dumping syn­drome. These include avoiding a high carbohydrate diet; eating small, frequent meals; not ingesting fluids with the meals; and lying down for about 60 minutes after eating. Patients with severe symptoms have been successfully treated with the long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide. The problem with this form of treatment is cost and the long-term need for injection therapy.
Surgical Management
As always, surgical treatment for the dumping syndrome is a last resort. Some operative approaches are simple and have a chance to succeed. These include pyloric sphincter reconstruction when a pyloroplasty is present, or take­down of gastrojejunostomy when the stomach is otherwise intact. Other surgical options are more complex and should be undertaken only in extreme cases. These include conversion of Bilroth II gastrectomy to Bilroth I, and inter­position of jejunum between the stomach and the duode­num. The latter procedures have had variable success.
GASTRIC MALIGNANCIES
Information regarding premalignant conditions and other factors of gastric malignancy is summarized in Table
2.14.
Premalignant Conditions
Helicobacter pylori
Patients with H. pylori infection have a six- to nine-fold increased risk of gastric cancer. The pathogenesis is thought to proceed from gastritis to dysplasia to cancer (Figure 2.24). The incidence of mucosa-associated lym­phoid malignancy is higher than adenocarcinoma.
Atrophic Gastritis and Pernicious Anemia
The risk of developing adenocarcinoma is increased nearly six-fold in patients with atrophic gastritis and pernicious anemia. In a longitudinal prospective study, 1 in 80 patients with pernicious anemia developed cancer.
10
The achlorhydria that accompanies this condition favors bacterial proliferation, which generates carcinogenic nitrosamines from nitrates in food.
Gastric Polyps
Adenomatous polyps, which represent about 10% of all gastric polyps, pose significant risk for cancer. The cancer risk in small adenomatous polyps (<2 cm) is 2%, but the risk rises to 24% in polyps 2 cm or larger.
Gastric Ulcer
The incidence of malignant degeneration of a benign gastric ulcer is probably no higher than 1% to 2%. On the other hand, malignant lesions can masquerade as benign ulcers more frequently.
Hypergastrinemia
Hypergastrinemia can be caused by gastrinoma, by pro­longed achlorhydria that occurs as a result of atrophic gas­tritis, and by long-term therapy with proton-pump inhibitors. Hypergastrinemia results in hyperplasia of the ECL cells and a tendency to cause carcinoid tumors. Gastric carcinoids occur more frequently in patients with atrophic gastritis and the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome. Long-term therapy with proton-pump inhibitor has caused carcinoid tumors in mice, but there has been no
TABLE 2.14. Essentials: Gastric Malignancy
Premalignant conditions
H. pylori infection Atrophic gastritis and pernicious anemia Gastric polyps Gastric ulcer Hypergastrinemia Blood group A Previous gastric resection Ménétrier’s disease
Carcinoma of the stomach
Falling incidence Gross appearance: Polypoid, ulcerative, colloid, or infiltrative Surgical treatment: Bilroth II or total gastrectomy Early gastric cancer
No invasion of muscularis
10% of gastric cancers in U.S.
5-year survival of 70%–95%
Advanced gastric cancer
Invasion of muscularis and/or lymph node metastasis
80% of cases in U.S.
Gastric carcinoid tumors
Classification
Type I: Associated with atrophic gastritis
Type II: Associated with MEN-I syndrome
Type III: Sporadic; most are malignant and metastasize to liver
Treatment
Tumors <2 cm: Endoscopic excision
Tumors >2 cm: Resection with 1-cm margin
Gastric lymphoma
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of B-cell type Significant association with MALT and H. pylori infection 40% present with bleeding, perforation or obstruction Cure rate of 65%–75% after curative resection and
neoadjuvant therapy
Treatment
Responsive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy
When confined to stomach: Curative resection followed by adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy
Abbreviations: MALT, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; MEN-1, multiple endocrine neoplasia-1.
FIGURE 2.24. Helicobacter pylori and genesis of gastric cancer.
reported incidence of carcinoid tumors in humans on long-term therapy. The clinical effects of long-term hyper­gastrinemia are listed in Table 2.15.
surgically. A few patients with gastric polyposis (Figure
2.25) require total gastrectomy to prevent cancer.
Stromal Tumors
Leiomyomas are common stromal neoplasms of the gastric smooth muscle. Most are asymptomatic and found only at autopsy. Nearly 50% occur in the gastric corpus. They usually protrude into the lumen but can also grow outwardly. A central ulceration of the overlying mucosa may develop and may cause upper GI bleeding (Figure
2.26). Symptomatic lesions or those 3cm or more in diam­eter should be surgically excised with a 2 to 3cm margin of normal gastric wall.
Some 50% of unresectable malignant stromal tumors have been shown to respond to treatment with imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®), a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The tumors that respond express CD117, a marker for KIT-receptor tyrosine kinase, an enzyme critical in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors including leiomyosarcoma.
Ménétrier’s Disease (Hypertrophic Gastritis)
11
Blood Group A
A strong association exists between gastric cancer and individuals with blood Group A.
Previous Partial Gastrectomy
Patients who had partial gastrectomy 20 or more years ago have an increased risk of developing adenocarcinoma in the gastric stump.
Ménétrier’s Disease
An undefined risk of gastric cancer exists in Ménétrier’s disease.
Benign Neoplasms
Adenomatous Polyps
Adenomatous polyps, the most common benign neo­plasms, are premalignant lesions. They may be single or multiple. They can cause bleeding or intussusception into the pylorus, causing gastric outlet obstruction. Lesions 2 cm or greater should be resected either endoscopically or
TABLE 2.15. Essentials: Clinical Effects of Long-Term
Hypergastrinemia in Humans
Ménétrier’s disease is diffuse gastric mucosal hypertrophy that can lead to massive enlargement of rugal folds, usually sparing the antrum. No unanimity of opinion exists about the microscopic diagnostic criteria, but the disease involves expansion of the glandular stomach with elon­gated and branched gastric pits, often with focal cystic dilatation (Figure 2.27). The gastric hypertrophy can
Known effects
Increased ECL cells Increased parietal cells Thickening of gastric mucosa
Probable risks
Development of gastric carcinoids Accelerated growth of colonic neoplasms
Abbreviations: ECL, enterochromaffin-like.
FIGURE 2.25. Gastric polyposis (arrows) is demonstrated with a barium upper GI series. If the polyposis is extensive, total gas­trectomy may be required to prevent cancer. (Courtesy of Henry I. Goldberg, MD.)
72 ..................................................................................................................... Stomach and Duodenum
A
B
FIGURE 2.26. Gastric leiomyomas. These are common benign neoplasms of the gastric smooth muscle
that are usually asymptomatic. (A) They may be detected by endoscopy and barium upper GI x-rays as a large round smooth mass (arrows), especially when they degenerate into leiomyosarcoma. (B) The partial gastrectomy surgical specimen shows a leiomyosarcoma that projects into the lumen as a poly­poid mass. (Courtesy of Linda D. Ferrell, MD, and Henry I. Goldberg, MD.)
C linical M anagement .......................................................................................................................... 73
A
B
FIGURE 2.27. Ménétrier’s disease. (A) Gross appearance of Ménétrier’s disease shows hyperplastic,
hypertrophic giant rugal folds involving mostly the body of the stomach. (B) Microscopic examination shows hypertrophic gastritis, with replacement of the normal mucosa by hyperplastic surface epithelial cells forming convoluted or cystic structures extending to the muscularis. (Reprinted with permission from Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Lantz P, Listrom M, et al., eds. Gastrointestinal Pathology Plus. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.)
74 ..................................................................................................................... Stomach and Duodenum
FIGURE 2.28. Gross classification of gastric cancer. Gastric cancer can be polypoid, ulcerating, or infiltrating. Linitis plastica is the infil-
trating type with the poorest survival outcome. (Adapted from Douglass HO, Nava HR. Gastric adenocarcinoma—management of the primary disease. Semin Surg Oncol 1985;12:32–45.)
mimic that seen in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, but there is no associated hypergastrinemia or acid hyper­secretion. The hypertrophic mucosa may secrete proteins and lead to hypoalbuminemia. The primary clinical symp­toms are abdominal pain, malnutrition, edema, and weight loss.
Antisecretory therapy (anticholinergics, H
blockers,
2
proton-pump inhibitors) is used to decrease acid and fluid loss and thereby to limit protein loss. In rare circum­stances, when symptoms are severe and uncontrollable, total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy is necessary.
Pseudolymphoma
In pseudolymphoma, lymphocytic infiltration of the gastric mucosa leads to diffuse thickening or enlargement of rugal folds. Microscopically, lymphoid follicles have clearly reactive germinal centers.
Carcinoma of the Stomach
Incidence
There is wide geographic variation in the incidence of gastric cancer. The number of cases per 100,000 popula­tion varies from 8 in the United States to 18 in England and Wales, 49 in Chile, over 50 in Japan and Russia, and 78 in Costa Rica. decline in the incidence of gastric cancer has occurred over the past 70 years, from 40 per 100,000 men in the 1930s, to about 8 per 100,000 in the 1990s. accounted for 20% to 30% of all cancer deaths 50 years ago. Today, it accounts for only 3%. partly by the higher standard of living achieved, changing dietary habits, and perhaps the reduction in H. pylori
12
In the United States, a remarkable
13
Gastric cancer
14
This can be explained
infections as a result of improved sanitation and food handling and increased use of antibiotics. Clearly, the inci­dence of gastric cancer is inversely related to the socioe­conomic status of the populations it affects.
Pathology
Four macroscopic appearances (Figure 2.28) are seen in stomach cancer:
1. Malignant ulcer;
2. Polypoid tumor growing into the lumen;
3. Colloid tumor, which is gelatinous and capable of massive growth; and
4. Linitis plastica, a scirrhous cancer that infiltrates the submucosa to cause “leather-bottle stomach.”
Microscopically, tumors are identified as adenocarcinoma with various degrees of differentiation. Linitis plastica is particularly anaplastic, manifesting clumps of bizarre­looking cells with surrounding fibrosis. Signet-ring cell carcinoma is particularly malignant in its behavior. Signet­ring cells result from intracellular mucus secretion (Figure
2.29).
Depth of Invasion
The depth of invasion has great prognostic significance in gastric cancer and is the basis for classifying gastric cancer as “early” or “advanced.”
ARLY GASTRIC CANCER Cancer detected in patients
E
early involves only the mucosa and submucosa and does not penetrate the muscularis propria (Figure 2.27). Even the presence of lymph node metastasis does not severely
C linical M anagement .......................................................................................................................... 75
A
B
FIGURE 2.29. Gastric adenocarcinoma. Microscopic appearance of two types of gastric adenocarcinoma:
(A) Superficial carcinoma with keratin stain demonstrates a tumor that has not invaded the muscularis mucosa and has an excellent prognosis. (B) By contrast, linitis plastica with signet-ring cells has a very poor prognosis but, fortunately, accounts for only 10% of gastric cancer. (Courtesy of Linda D. Ferrell, MD.)
76 ..................................................................................................................... Stomach and Duodenum
A
FIGURE 2.30. Late gastric cancer. (A and B) Once the muscularis propria is involved, the prognosis is
considerably worsened. Even an apparently superficial malignant ulcer, seen on a double-contrast upper GI series (arrows in A), may be found to penetrate the muscularis propria when surgical resec­tion is performed (arrows in B). (Courtesy of Henry I. Goldberg, MD.)
B
affect the good prognosis of early gastric cancer. The 5-year survival rate is 70% to 95%, depending on whether or not lymph nodes are involved.
15
Unfortunately, only 10% to 15% of all gastric carcinomas are early cancers at diagno­sis. Endoscopic screening to diagnose gastric cancer at this early stage is too expensive and has a low yield, even in
incidence of proximal gastric cancers has been increasing, and some 25% of these patients present with dysphagia. Approximately 10% of the patients present with dissemi­nated disease as evidenced by an enlarged left supraclavic­ular node (Virchow’s node), rectal shelf (Bloomer’s shelf), hepatomegaly, jaundice, or ascites.
countries like Japan, where the disease is endemic.
DVANCED GASTRIC CANCER Once the invasion pene-
A
trates the muscularis propria, prognosis declines (Figure
2.30). Unfortunately, more than 80% of all gastric cancers encountered in the United States are advanced at the time of diagnosis.
Investigations
A double-contrast barium meal test is the most economi­cal preliminary examination in patients with nonspecific symptoms (Figure 2.31). About 15% of those so examined require endoscopy. Endoscopy with multiple biopsies and brushing is the most specific way to establish the diagno-
Clinical Presentation
Symptoms are insidious. Abdominal pain and weight loss are seen in 50% and 60% of patients, respectively. Other symptoms include anorexia and early satiety. The relative
C linical M anagement .......................................................................................................................... 77
sis. Endoscopic ultrasonography indicates the depth of wall invasion with 80% to 90% accuracy, but its ability to detect involved lymph nodes is less than 70%.
Computed tomography is a useful examination. It may
not only show the gastric lesion and thickening of the
TABLE 2.16. TNM Classification of Carcinoma of the Stomach
Primary tumor (T) TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed T0 No evidence of primary tumor Tis Carcinoma in situ: intraepithial tumor without
T1 Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa T2 Tumor invades muscularis propria or subserosa T2a Tumor invades mucularis propria T2b Tumor invades subserosa T3 Tumor penetrates serosa (visceral peritoneum)
T4 Tumor invades adjacent structures
Regional lymph nodes (N) NX Regional lymph node(s) cannot be assessed N0 No regional lymph node metastasis N1 Metastasis in 1 to 6 regional lymph nodes N2 Metastasis in 7 to 15 regional lymph nodes N3 Metastasis in more than 15 regional lymph nodes
Distant metastasis (M) MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed M0 No distant metastasis M1 Distant metastasis
Source: Reprinted with permission from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, Illinois. The original source for this material is the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Sixth Edition (2002) published by Springer­Verlag New York, www.springer-ny.com.
invasion of the lamina propria
without invasion of adjacent structures
FIGURE 2.31. Barium meal test for gastric cancer. Nonspecific symptoms that may be indicative of gastric cancer are best and most economically evaluated at the outset with a double­contrast barium meal test. This double-contrast upper GI radiography demonstrates a Type I, slightly raised, lobulated early gastric cancer (arrows) in the body of the stomach. (Courtesy of Henry I. Goldberg, MD.)
stomach wall but indicates the presence of extragastric extension. Its most important role, however, is to detect the presence of metastases in the liver and in other abdom­inal organs.
Staging
Accurate staging is possible only after surgery. The use of laparoscopy to stage the disease is promising but its role is yet undefined. The most widely used staging method is the
TNM classification and clinical staging (Tables 2.16 and
2.17).
Surgical Treatment
Surgical resection provides the only hope for curing gastric cancer. Even then, some patients show criteria of inoper­ability at the time of presentation. These include the pres­ence of Virchow’s node, obvious liver metastasis, rectal shelf, and ascites.
The type of gastric resection needed depends on loca­tion of the tumor (Figure 2.32). In all cases, proximal and distal surgical margins should be clear of tumor for at least
TABLE 2.17. Relating TNM Classification to Clinical Staging of
Gastric Cancer
Stage TNM classification
0 T1S N0 M0 IA T1 N0 M0 IB T1 N1 M0
T2 N0 M0
II T1 N2 M0
T2 N1 M0 T3 N0 M0
IIIA T2 N2 M0
T3 N1 M0 T4 N0 M0
IIIB T3 N2 M0
T4 N1 M0
IV T4 N2 M0
Any T Any N M1
78 ..................................................................................................................... Stomach and Duodenum