Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5813_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
21 Мб
Скачать
216
C. Giussani et al.
During the time lapse between the radiology department and the operating room post­traumatic intracranial hematomas and brain con­tusions might develop or increase in size. Such evolution might obviously affect patients’ prog­nosis and outcome but it also affects the manage­ment of the patient during surgery that may be performed blindly, especially in case of develop­ment of contralateral hematomas or in case of growing hematomas [9]. Furthermore this same scenario can occur intraoperatively, when the opening of a close system such as the skull is modied, leading to changes in blood inow and outow and CSF dynamics, ultimately changing brain perfusion and intracranial pressure.
In such an emergency setting, a real-time intraoperative imaging modality can be of help in evaluating a lesion under development, allowing a real-time scanning of the surgical eld.
Intraoperative imaging techniques available in neurosurgery are computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US). The rst two techniques are very accurate but they are cost and time consum­ing and they could not be useful in an emergency setting especially for the amount of time needed to achieve a full brain scan [10]. Intraoperative US (ioUS) is less expensive than the rst two techniques and it does not require radiology tech­nicians or dedicated personnel, nor involve the use of ionizing radiations. Such characteristics make ioUS available in many neurosurgical cen­ters and 24/7 [10, 11].
In current neurosurgical settings, ioUS is mainly used in B-mode to perform a morphologi­cal evaluation of the surgical eld, in order to localize supercial and deep-seated lesions after bone ap removal; fusion imaging with preopera­tive imaging allows orientation and comparison with other imaging modalities [12, 13]. Ultrasound is nowadays a multiparametric imag­ing modality with advanced functions [14]:
• Color Doppler scans in order to locate vessels
and understand their integrity after surgery
[15, 16]
• Sonoelastograms that are able to assess
mechanical properties of brain tissues [1719]
• Contrast-enhanced scans that are able to describe pathological brain tissue and to per­form perfusion studies able to understand the areas of secondary damage [2022]
For its versatility, the use of ioUS is becoming
more widespread and it is now a fundamental tool in the neurosurgical equipment [11]. In fact, intraoperative real-time imaging has demon­strated to have several advantages over preopera­tive imaging since anatomy can change during surgery due to brain shifting and physiopatho­logical and surgically induced tissue deformation [23]. Despite the extensive literature reporting the cost-effective benets of ioUS and the increased quality of imaging through the years, neurosurgeons do not generally consider ioUS as a user-friendly technique [24]. This is mainly related with the fact that ioUS is not used a stan­dard diagnostic tool, the topographic anatomy is not clear, and it employs scans that differ from the three standard preoperative orthogonal planes since pictures are mainly acquired in 2D along several variable planes different from the three standard ones. These problems can be overcome by an appropriate training which requires daily elective practice to better understand probe and image orientations, to increase the ability to interpret anatomy and to reduce the time spent to understand the pictures acquired [24].
Nowadays, ioUS is mainly used for neuro-
oncological, epilepsy, and vascular neurosurgery. In the neuro-oncological and epilepsy setting, ioUS is used to localize the lesion, to check for complete resection at the end of surgery, and to correct the neuro-navigation according to the brain shift during the surgical removal of the tumor [12, 13, 15, 20, 21, 25, 26]. Contrast­enhanced US (CEUS) is used for better denition of a lesion and to better dene the perilesional tissue, while color Doppler technique might be useful in some cases with major vessel encasement. Moreover, some advanced reports deal with the utility of sonoelastogram in under­standing the mechanical properties of the brain and differentiating between low-grade and high­grade gliomas [17, 19, 20]. For what concerns vascular neurosurgical cases, ioUS is mainly
19 Intraoperative Echo inTBI
217
used for arteriovascular malformation (AVM) localization and color Doppler or angiosono­graphic studies of AVMs or dural arteriovenous stulas in order to dene the intraoperative occlu­sion of the malformation after surgery [15, 16,
27, 28].
Moreover, in some cases, ioUS is used for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement [29], especially when free-hand technique is at high risk of malpositioning, and drainage of cystic lesions like brain abscesses [30].
In case of TBIs, ioUS is not routinely used in neurosurgical procedure and, despite its real­time capacities, has not been employed to understand during surgery the evolution of the dramatically dynamic phenomena that occurs in trauma patients. Also ioUS does not have nowa­days a denitive role in dening the prognosis and outcome of patients undergoing surgery for major brain injuries. As a consequence only few series of patients or case reports have been reported in the literature regarding the utility of ioUS; most of them deal with decompressive craniectomy (DC) for ICP control after failure of medical management [31, 32]. Besides these, some experimental models have been described in order to understand the potential utility of ioUS [33].
In this chapter we are going to describe the multiple options that ioUS can offer in the sur­gery of major TBIs in an emergency setting.
19.2 Utility ofioUS inTBI
Performing surgery in patients with traumatic brain lesions is like interfering on the natural his­tory of a major TBI without having control on it. As a consequence, during the time lapse between the diagnostic CT scan and the postoperative CT scan, each patient can develop post-traumatic lesions other than the one for which surgery is being done.
Routine use of ioUS may be of help in order to control during surgery if a patient is developing other post-traumatic lesions such as posterior fossa hematomas or homolateral and contralat­eral hematomas since ioUS allows to explore
contralateral hemisphere and posterior fossa structures.
Moreover, an intraoperative picture of brain parenchyma may be of help in order to under­stand the persistence of brain shift or uncus her­niation after a decompressive craniectomy (DC). Finally, evaluating the dimensions of ventricles in some cases may lead to a direct placement of an EVD under US guidance which can reduce the risk of malpositioning.
Furthermore, advanced ioUS modalities such as CEUS and SEG might be helpful in under­standing vessel integrity and tissue perfusion, highlighting contusions, and showing parenchy­mal edema/elasticity.
19.2.1 Intraoperative Use ofUS
In an emergency setting it is difcult to routinely use ioUS since surgery needs quick decision­making and a fast performance. As a matter of facts, reports about ioUS use in TBIs mainly regard case reports or small case series of patients undergoing DC after failure of medical management.
In this small burden of papers, of some note is the study by Hepner and colleagues that report the use of CEUS in patients undergoing DC for ICP control [31]. In their work, they report the results of cerebral perfusion measured with CEUS in a series of six patients undergoing DC.In particular, it has been shown that cerebral perfusion can increase after DC and that CEUS during ioUS can be used as a reference for post­craniectomy check of the brain perfusion at the bedside of the patient during the stay in ICU. Patients without the bone ap can be explored with US with or without CEUS and in some cases secondary damage can be seen like areas of hypoperfusion due to uncontrolled ICP [31, 34].
Another interesting study is the one by He and colleagues [32]. In their study they showed the potential utility of CEUS in patients undergoing resection of contused brain showing how CEUS was able to identify more hypo-perfused brain tissue than the standard US.
218
C. Giussani et al.
Other few experiences are available in litera­ture but they deal with experiences of small groups of patients or of case reports [7]. This is mainly related with the fact that there is still not a routine use of ioUS in TBIs during surgical pro­cedures and this might be due to:
• Difcult management of a new imaging tech-
nique in an emergency setting
• No known benets about the usefulness of
routinary use of ioUS in patients with TBIs
19.2.2 Possible Scenarios
As reported above, surgery for TBI can present some obstacles that requires some changes from what was briey planned preoperatively. In par­ticular, patients can present unexpected bleedings due to a damage of major vessels, hematomas in the contralateral hemisphere, and further evolu­tion of hidden contusions after release of the intracranial pressure.
Contralateral hematomas can be considered a common complication of major TBIs but they do not generally require surgical intervention. In fact, bilateral small contusions can be consid­ered a common nding such as evolution of small subdural hematomas without signicant mass effect. In fact, surgical management of contralateral site hemorrhages is considered a rare event and about 50 case series are reported in literature [69]. Such hematomas especially occur after evacuation of acute subdural hema­tomas (ASDH). In quite all cases such event occurs immediately during surgery and it requires a quick planning of a new surgical pro­cedure. Only a couple of case reports dealt with the fast management of such complications using ioUS. The most interesting and well described is the one from Pil Soo Kim etal. [7]: in their experience, the use of ioUS determined a fast shifting from a unilateral surgery to a bilateral surgery that allowed to minimize the secondary damage due to a fast-growing contra­lateral hematoma. According to their experi­ence, ioUS can allow to check for complications after surgery in TBIs while the patient is still in
the operating room. This is in line with our experience as reported in the explanatory cases of this chapter.
Another clinical scenario can involve patients with post-traumatic hematomas managed conser­vatively. In fact, sometimes post-traumatic hema­tomas can be managed conservatively in the rst instance but some of them require a delayed sur­gical evacuation due to increase of perilesional edema. In these cases, colliquation of blood allows endoscopic evacuation of the clot that can be guided by ioUS.In fact ioUS can be used for localizing the clot and for checking the volume of hematoma after evacuation. In other cases, hema­tomas can be liquid enough in order to be drained under US guidance [35].
Finally, in case of brain swelling due to TBIs it might be necessary at the end of a DC to place an EVD.In these cases, EVD placement can be considered challenging even for experienced neurosurgeons since usually ventricles are col­lapsed due to the brain edema. In such a scenario, the presence of a large bone defect is of help in order to use the US probe and place an EVD under US guidance [29].
19.2.3 Explanatory Cases
19.2.3.1 Case n. 1
Seventy-six-year-old lady presenting to the A&E department intubated on the scene after a brain injury with left-sided anisocoria and GCS 3 due to sedation. The CT scan at presentation (see Fig. 19.1) documented the presence of a left­sided ASDH with a rounded isodense lesion in the right frontal lobe without any mass effect. Due to the clinical presentation and the radiologi­cal focal hematoma, it was decided to perform a left-sided craniotomy for evacuation of the ASDH.During surgery, a sudden brain swelling was experienced after clot evacuation. For this reason, a B-mode ioUS scan was performed that documented a right-sided post-traumatic frontal hematoma with mass effect and a midline shift (see Fig.19.1). Due to the documented formation of the hematoma, it was decided to perform a right-sided frontal craniotomy. At the opening of
cd
19 Intraoperative Echo inTBI
ab
219
Fig. 19.1 Explanatory case n. 1. (a) Preoperative brain CT scan showing a right-sided frontal rounded contusion and a left-sided extradural hematoma. (b) Intraoperative US after left-sided craniotomy showing a big right frontal
the dura, a large right frontal hematoma was found. Postoperative CT scan of the brain docu­mented the surgical cavity and clot removal.
contusion with midline shift and intraventricular clot (RF right frontal lobe; *left ventricle). (c) Postoperative CT scan. (d) Intraoperative US after removal of the right fron­tal hematoma
ment where he started having intractable seizure. He was intubated by the emergency team and he underwent an antiepileptic treatment and a subse­quent fast brain MRI that showed a large frontal
19.2.3.2 Case n. 2
A 10-month-old baby boy fell from the changing table having a traumatic head injury from a 1.3m height. He was transported to the A&E depart-
contusion without signicant mass effect (see Fig.19.2a). The EEG showed a persistent seizure after suspension of sedation despite anticonvul­sive therapy. Given this nding we decided to
220
ab
cd
C. Giussani et al.
Fig. 19.2 Explanatory case n. 2. (a) Preoperative brain MRI showing a right frontal hematoma. (b) Postoperative brain MRI showing the surgical cavity in the frontal lobe.
evacuate the hematoma with a small frontal cra­niotomy and a minimally invasive procedure through a small corticectomy. IoUS was per­formed and it was helpful to quantify the amount of blood before opening the dura mater (Fig. 19.2c) and after clot removal in order to understand if there were any blood remnants (see Fig.19.2d). Postoperative scans showed removal of the clot without complications in the surgical cavity (see Fig.19.2b).
(c) Intraoperative US showing the right frontal lobe hema­toma. (d) Intraoperative US showing the surgical cavity
After surgery the baby slowly resolved the grand mal seizures and recovered in a couple of weeks returning back to home.
This case is of interest because of its rarity and because it brings light on the potential use of US in the emergency setting in case of pediatric TBIs. In fact, in some cases involving newborns and infants with open anterior fontanel, US can be performed at the bedside and it is particularly important in case of unstable conditions that do
19 Intraoperative Echo inTBI
221
not allow transfer to the radiology department. In these cases, US through the bregmatic fontanel can be used to briey exclude signicant lesions with mass effect or midline shift or it can be used to observe the evolution of TBIs. In case of minor injuries, it can also be used to avoid a brain CT scan and to reduce the exposure to ionizing radiations.

19.3 Future Perspectives

Routine use of ioUS allows to open further per­spectives in prognosis stratication of patients with major TBIs. In fact, ioUS can be performed as a baseline evaluation of the brain at the moment of surgery that can be used for future compari­sons during the ICU recovery [31]. Moreover, it can be used as a way to estimate the primary and secondary brain damage at the beginning of the clinical history of a patient [32]. As a matter of fact, the majority of the published studies deal with the role of US in patients who have under­gone DC [31, 32, 34, 36]. The presence of a large bone defect determines the possibility to explore the brain with the US probe without the interfer­ence of the skull that, in many cases, makes the brain inaccessible to the US.
One of the issues in comparing the preopera­tive and postoperative ndings is the region of interest to be used in order to appreciate US changes in terms of perfusion or brain elasticity. As proposed by Hepner etal. in 2006, compari­son of brain perfusion with CEUS can be per­formed using the rst burr hole performed for the DC as “the region of interest” (ROI) for further postoperative comparisons [31]. Moreover, they were able to perform the preoperative scans with a small burr hole probe. In their study acquisition of perfusion data was performed only on six patients but they assessed that DC was related with an improvement of brain perfusion at the postoperative US scans. With this perspective, future studies may be directed to distinguish between patients with low response to DC and patients with a good response to DC.
In a study by He and colleagues the utility of ioUS with CEUS in traumatic brain injuries was
reported on a series of 32 patients [32]. In one group they performed standard ioUS while in the other group they performed ioUS with CEUS.They showed interesting results about the information that CEUS can add to the normal US.In fact, according to their study, CEUS can show the difference between vital brain and hypo-perfused dead-brain tissue that can appear normal at the standard US.Findings about vital or dead brain can change the surgical plan in case of resection of brain contusion or in case of sur­gery of intraparenchymal hematomas. As a mat­ter of fact, in the study by He etal. it was found that CEUS demonstrated a larger hypo-perfused brain area around the contused brain tissue than was planned to be removed. In those cases of brain with low perfusion at CEUS, neurosur­geons planned a larger brain resection. Despite their interesting ndings, their study had some limitations such as the lack of a longitudinal fol­low- up in order to understand if removal of per­ilesional damaged brain can increase patient’s outcome reducing the secondary brain damage due to cytotoxic edema, or the simple resection of the contused area could lead to a recovery of the perilesional area.
Moreover, starting from this point, brain stiff­ness at the time of DC may be studied with the systematic performance of elastosonography with ioUS. In fact, one of the new frontiers in brain US is the study of brain elastance. Elastance can be measured applying the US probe on the brain surface and it can give information about pathological conditions of the brain, like it has been described in experimental models of isch­emic strokes in mice or in case of patients with brain tumors [17, 37].
Moreover, changes of stiffness may reect changes of brain perfusion. In a previous work by Xu and colleagues it was found that in a rodent model of ischemic stroke there were changes in brain elastograms due to reduction of brain per­fusion and increase of brain edema [38]. The same research group studied a rodent model of TBI [33]. In their study, they found that US elas­tography is able to detect changes in the uid content of the brain after a mild brain trauma. In a speculative way, given these reports and the
222
C. Giussani et al.
raising knowledge about MR elastography, it will be possible to prognosticate the outcome of a patient with high ICP and with repeated mea­sures of brain elastance with brain US.Moreover, comparison with intraoperative ndings will pos­sibly allow to distinguish patients with poor prognosis from patients with a good outcome.

References

1. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, etal. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery. 2016;80(1):6.
2. Management of Concussion/mTBI Working Group. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for management of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46:CP1–68.
3. Vella MA, Crandall ML, Patel MB. Acute manage­ment of traumatic brain injury. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97:1015–30.
4. Murray GD, Brennan PM, Teasdale GM.Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: graphical presentation of probabilities. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:1621–34.
5. Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM.Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: the GCS-pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:1612–20.
6. Shen J, Pan JW, Fan ZX, Zhou YQ, Chen Z, Zhan RY. Surgery for contralateral acute epidural hema­toma following acute subdural hematoma evacua­tion: ve new cases and a short literature review. Acta Neurochir. 2013;155:335–41.
7. Kim PS, Yu SH, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Kim BC. Intraoperative transcranial sonography for detection of contralateral hematoma volume change in patients with traumatic brain injury. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2017;13:137.
8. Su T-M, Lee T-H, Chen W-F, Lee T-C, Cheng C-H. Contralateral acute epidural hematoma after decompressive surgery of acute subdural hema­toma: clinical features and outcome. J Trauma. 2008;65:1298–302.
9. Choi YH, Lim TK, Lee SG. Clinical features and outcomes of bilateral decompression surgery for immediate contralateral hematoma after craniec­tomy following acute subdural hematoma. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2017;13:108.
10. Moiyadi A, Shetty P. Objective assessment of util­ity of intraoperative ultrasound in resection of cen­tral nervous system tumors: a cost-effective tool for intraoperative navigation in neurosurgery. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;02:004–11.
11. Pino M, Imperato A, Musca I, etal. New hope in brain glioma surgery: the role of intraoperative ultrasound. A Review. Brain Sci. 2018;8:202.
12. Velthoven V.Intraoperative ultrasound imaging: com­parison of pathomorphological ndings in US versus CT, MRI and intraoperative ndings. In: Bernays RL, Imhof H-G, Yonekawa Y, editors. Intraoperative imag­ing neurosurgery. Vienna: Springer Vienna; 2003. p.95–9.
13. Sun H, Zhao JZ. Application of intraoperative ultra­sound in neurological surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007;50:155–9.
14. Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Postema AW, Hagemann J, Budäus L, Tilki D, Mischi M, Wijkstra H, Salomon G. Multiparametric ultrasound: evalu­ation of greyscale, shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization in correlation to radical prostatectomy specimens. BMC Urol. 2018;18:98.
15. Prada F, Del Bene M, Faragò G, DiMeco F. Spinal dural arteriovenous stula: is there a role for intra­operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound? World Neurosurg. 2017;100:712.e15–8.
16. Bartels E. Evaluation of arteriovenous malforma­tions (AVMs) with transcranial color-coded duplex sonography: does the location of an AVM inu­ence its sonographic detection? J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1511–7.
17. Prada F, Del Bene M, Moiraghi A, etal. From grey scale B-mode to elastosonography: multimodal ultrasound imaging in meningioma surgery—pic­torial essay and literature review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–13.
18. Del Bene M, Perin A, Casali C, Legnani F, Saladino A, Mattei L, Vetrano IG, Saini M, DiMeco F, Prada F. Advanced ultrasound imaging in glioma surgery: beyond gray-scale B-mode. Front Oncol. 2018;8:576.
19. Chauvet D, Imbault M, Capelle L, Demene C, Mossad M, Karachi C, Boch A-L, Gennisson J-L, Tanter M.In vivo measurement of brain tumor elasticity using intraoperative shear wave elastography. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37:584–90.
20. Prada F, Bene MD, Fornaro R, etal. Identication of residual tumor with intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during glioblastoma resection. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40:E7.
21. Mattei L, Prada F, Marchetti M, Gaviani P, DiMeco F. Differentiating brain radionecrosis from tumour recurrence: a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound? Acta Neurochir. 2017;159:2405–8.
22. Sastry R, Bi WL, Pieper S, Frisken S, Kapur T, Wells W, Golby AJ.Applications of ultrasound in the resec­tion of brain tumors: ultrasound in brain tumor resec­tion. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27:5–15.
23. Reinertsen I, Lindseth F, Askeland C, Iversen DH, Unsgård G.Intra-operative correction of brain-shift. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:1301–10.
24. Giussani C, Riva M, Djonov V, Beretta S, Prada F, Sganzerla E. Brain ultrasound rehearsal before sur­gery: a pilot cadaver study: cerebral ultrasound in cadaveric heads. Clin Anat. 2017;30:1017–23.
25. Coburger J, Scheuerle A, Pala A, Thal D, Wirtz CR, König R. Histopathological insights on imaging
19 Intraoperative Echo inTBI
223
results of intraoperative magnetic resonance imag­ing, 5-aminolevulinic acid, and intraoperative ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery. Neurosurgery. 2017;81:165–74.
26. Prada F, Gennari AG, Del Bene M, Bono BC, Quaia E, D’Incerti L, Villani F, Didato G, Tringali G, DiMeco F. Intraoperative ultrasonography (ioUS) characteristics of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II b. Seizure. 2019;69:80–6.
27. Unsgård G, Rao V, Solheim O, Lindseth F.Clinical experience with navigated 3D ultrasound angiogra­phy (power Doppler) in microsurgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:875–83.
28. Prada F, Del Bene M, Saini M, Ferroli P, DiMeco F.Intraoperative cerebral angiosonography with ultra­sound contrast agents: how I do it. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:1025–9.
29. Maneld JH, Yu KKH. Real-time ultrasound-guided external ventricular drain placement: technical note. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43:E5.
30. Park H, Lee Y, Oh S, Lee HJ.Successful treatment with ultrasound-guided aspiration of intractable methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus brain abscess in an extremely low birth weight infant. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2015;50:210–5.
31. Heppner P, Ellegala DB, Durieux M, Jane JA, Lindner JR. Contrast ultrasonographic assessment of cere­bral perfusion in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:738–45.
32. He W, Wang L-S, Li H-Z, Cheng L-G, Zhang M, Wladyka CG. Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in traumatic brain surgery. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:983–8.
33. Xu ZS, Yao A, Chu SS, Paun MK, McClintic AM, Murphy SP, Mourad PD.Detection of mild traumatic brain injury in rodent models using shear wave elas­tography: preliminary studies. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:1763–71.
34. Sarà M, Sorpresi F, Guadagni F, Pistoia F. Real­time ultrasonography in craniectomized severely brain injured patients. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:169–70.
35. Sadahiro H, Nomura S, Goto H, Sugimoto K, Inamura A, Fujiyama Y, Yamane A, Oku T, Shinoyama M, Suzuki M. Real-time ultrasound-guided endoscopic surgery for putaminal hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:1151–5.
36. Bobinger T, Huttner HB, Schwab S.Bedside ultra­sound after decompressive craniectomy: a new stan­dard? Neurocrit Care. 2017;26:319–20.
37. Prada F, Del Bene M, Rampini A, etal. Intraoperative strain elastosonography in brain tumor surgery. Oper Neurosurg. 2019;17:227–36.
38. Xu ZS, Lee RJ, Chu SS, Yao A, Paun MK, Murphy SP, Mourad PD. Evidence of changes in brain tis­sue stiffness after ischemic stroke derived from ultrasound-based elastography. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:485–94.
Neurosonology inTropical Medicine
DavidClark andPeterJohnAshtonHutchinson
Contents
20.1 Introduction 225
20.2 Neurosonology inNeurological Infections intheTropics 226
20.3 Human Immunodeciency Virus 226
20.4 Tuberculous Meningitis 227
20.4.1 Intracranial Hypertension inTBM 227
20.4.2 Tuberculous Meningitis- Related Vasculopathy 227
20.5 Cryptococcal Meningitis 228
20.5.1 Intracranial Hypertension inCrM 229
20.5.2 Vasculopathy inCrM 229
20.6 Neurocysticercosis 229
20.6.1 Intracranial Hypertension inNeurocysticercosis 230
20.6.2 Vasculopathy inNCC 230
20.7 Cerebral Malaria 230
20.7.1 Raised Intracranial Pressure inPaediatric CM 231
20.7.2 Transcranial Doppler inPaediatric CM 232
20.8 Neurosonology inNon- infectious Diseases inTropical Regions 234
20.8.1 Sickle Cell Anaemia 234
20.8.2 Hydrocephalus 234
20.8.3 Traumatic Brain Injury 234
20.9 Implementation ofNeurosonology inHealth Systems
inLow- andMiddle- Income Countries 235
References 236
20
D. Clark (*) · P. J. A. Hutchinson National Institute of Health Research Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, Cambridge University Hospitals and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Division of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK e-mail: dj.clark@cantab.net; pjah2@cam.ac.uk
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 C. Robba, G. Citerio (eds.), Echography and Doppler of the Brain,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48202-2_20

20.1 Introduction

‘Tropical medicine’ refers to the eld of medicine that deals with pathologies, both infectious and non-infectious, that are prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions. Many of the diseases in this
225
226
D. Clark and P. J. A. Hutchinson
region result from poverty, poor sanitation, infra­structure and inadequate health sources [1]. Although infectious diseases have historically been the greatest challenge to healthcare provid­ers in these regions, ageing populations and rapid urbanisation mean non-communicable diseases (such as trauma and cerebrovascular disease) are becoming increasingly prevalent in low- and mid­dle-income countries (LMICs). Neurosonological techniques are a relatively inexpensive, non-inva­sive method of obtaining detailed information on intracranial pressure and haemodynamics. As such, neurosonology represents an exciting opportunity to better understand and improve the management of neurological conditions prevalent in the tropics where advanced diagnostic modali­ties such as neuroimaging or invasive multimo­dality neuromonitoring are not routinely available. In this chapter, we aim to review the literature on the role of neurosonology in a number of neuro­logical diseases typically encountered by doctors and other healthcare professionals working in tropical medicine and propose that it remains an underutilised technique in this environment. In addition, recommendations are made to help ensure effective and responsible implementation of neurosonology for those wishing to adopt it into their own tropical medicine practice.
20.2 Neurosonology inNeurological Infections intheTropics
Neurosonology in tropical neurological infec­tions has two main applications—transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) as non-invasive methods to diagnose raised intracranial pressure (ICP) in low-resource settings where invasive methods are unavailable or impractical, and TCD to evaluate vasculopathy secondary to infection. In the sections that follow, we present a brief overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of each condition fol­lowed by a review of perturbations in intracranial haemodynamics associated with each pathology and, nally, the role of neurosonology in their clinical management. We have decided to focus
on ve neurological infections that are prevalent in many tropical and subtropical countries—HIV, tuberculous meningitis, cryptococcal meningitis, neurocysticercosis and cerebral malaria. The role of neurosonology in central nervous system infections that are also prevalent in temperate regions (such as meningoencephalitides, brain abscesses and subdural empyema due to various aetiologies) is not covered here as this is dis­cussed in greater detail elsewhere.
20.3 Human Immunodeciency Virus
The incidence of stroke in LMICs is increasing, especially in young populations [2]. HIV infec­tion is an important risk factor for stroke in endemic regions [3]. HIV-associated vasculopa­thy is an important cause of HIV-related isch­aemic stroke [4, 5] and can be dened as intimal hyperplasia more than expected for age in an HIV patient, which includes several pathological ndings including accelerated atherosclerosis, non-atherosclerotic vasculopathy, vasculitis and small-vessel disease [6].
Two authors have published their experience of the use of TCD examination to assess vascu­lopathy in HIV infection [7, 8]. Brilla etal. found that both mean blood ow velocities of the MCAs were reduced and cerebral vasoreactivity (assessed using increase in mean blood ow velocity after administration of intravenous acet­azolamide) was impaired in HIV-infected indi­viduals (n = 31) relative to healthy controls (n = 10) [7]. Similarly, Chow et al. found that cerebral vasoreactivity (assessed using the response of cerebral blood ow to inhaled carbon dioxide) was impaired in 65 antiretroviral therapy- treated, virally suppressed HIV-infected individuals relative to 28 healthy controls [8]. The exact signicance of these ndings remains unclear but points to the possibility of intracra­nial endothelial dysfunction in response to chronic HIV infection.
In addition to HIV-associated vasculopathy, coagulopathy, cardiothromboembolism and, importantly, opportunistic infections are postulated to be important causes of HIV-related