Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4566_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
21 Мб
Скачать
The pathophysiological concept of
https://t.me/medicina_free
upper airway obstruction, the arousal threshold, muscle responsiveness and respiratory drive
Ludovico Messineo, Luigi Taranto-Montemurro and Elisa Perger
The repetitive collapse of the pharyngeal airway, characteristic of OSA leads to intermittent oxygen desaturations and sleep fragmentation and downstream consequences. Intermittent hypoxaemia activates the sympathetic nervous system, and it is the major trigger for cardiovascular and metabolic adverse consequences.
The occurrence of upper airway obstruction during sleep reflects an interplay between the removal of the wakefulness drive (which helps to maintain airway patency) and an individual susceptibility to collapse. Although individual risk factors are known, the precise pathophysiological pathways leading to upper airway obstruction and their reciprocal influence in patients with OSA need further investigation.
Research in the past decade has established that a number of key pathophysiological traits – or endotypes – contribute to the development of OSA (figure 1). These include not only an anatomically small, collapsible upper airway (high passive critical closing pressure of the upper airway (P airway dilator muscles during sleep (minimal increase in muscle activity to negative pharyngeal pressure), waking up prematurely to airway narrowing (a low respiratory arousal threshold) and having an oversensitive respiratory control system (high loop gain). It is likely that other factors such as end-expiratory lung volume, arousal intensity and redistribution of body fluid are also important.
Pharyngeal muscle relaxation during sleep and lack of sucient reactivation are key primary pathophysiological events leading to OSA. The reduced ventilation consequent to an obstructive event increases carbon dioxide (CO2) and ventilatory drive, which could
)), but also inadequate responsiveness of the upper-
crit
Key points
• OSA is a heterogeneous disease with highly varying underlying mechanisms.
• Four pathophysiological traits have been identified recently as responsible for OSA aetiology: predisposing anatomically small and collapsible upper airway; inadequate responsiveness of the upper-airway dilator muscles during sleep; a low respiratory arousal threshold; and an oversensitive respiratory control system (high loop gain).
• Identifying the mechanism underlying OSA for an individual will permit a personalised therapy to be designed based on the specific characteristics of the subject.
44
ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
CollapsibilityMuscle
threshold
gain
https://t.me/medicina_free
>2
1
0
crit
P
2
2
1
O
2
cmH
0.5 0
0.5
>2
0
Loop
responsiveness
Arousal
EMG
GG
% activity per cmH
–2–2.5
–1.5 0–0.5–1
<–2
<–2
2
O
OSA
O
2
0
–7.5
–15
22.5
–30
–30
–22.5 0–7.5–15
Epiglottic pressure swings cmH
0
–1
–1
–2
–2
1
1
V response/V disturbance
Figure 1. The interaction of four endotypic traits in OSA pathogenesis: in the presence of mild­to-moderate collapsibility, indicated by P
between −2 and 2 cmH2O, other nonanatomical
crit
traits play a role in OSA pathophysiology. The inability to recruit the upper airway dilator muscle in response to negative pharyngeal pressure swings during an obstructive event (% activity per cmH2O close to 0), a low arousal threshold (epiglottic pressure swings before the arousal above −15 cmH2O) and a high loop gain (close to or above 1) will contribute in dierent degrees to OSA development. Note that the boundaries between the four traits are intentionally blurred to show that the presence and severity of OSA is oen determined by the interaction of these pathogenic traits. EMGGG: genioglossus EMG; V response/V disturbance: ratio between the ventilatory response to a preceding ventilatory disturbance. Reproduced from Taranto­Montemurro (2019b) with permission.
lead to the activation of the pharyngeal muscles (muscle responsiveness) followed by the reduction of the upper airway resistance. Waking up prematurely (low arousal threshold) to a relatively modest level of airway narrowing can limit the ability to build up sucient respiratory stimuli to recruit the pharyngeal dilator muscles to open the upper airway, thereby achieving breathing stability. Thus, while arousals have an important role in protecting some patients from asphyxia during sleep, they may disrupt breathing stability and worsen OSA severity in patients with a low arousal threshold.
Pathophysiology studies have shown that interventions aiming to lower upper airway collapsibility, increase the activity to pharyngeal muscles, increase the arousal threshold or lower loop gain can reduce OSA severity. Moreover, recent evidence has demonstrated that treatment ecacy for oral appliances and pharmacological therapies are dependent on the severity of underlying pharyngeal collapsibility in individual patients. Taken together, all these observations indicate the necessity of developing simplified methods to accurately quantify the pathophysiological traits of OSA. Originally, endotype measurements were obtained by challenging upper airway function through CPAP manipulation during sleep, using sophisticated procedures that remained limited to specialised physiology laboratories. Further research permitted the development of noninvasive clinically applicable techniques to quantify OSA
45ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
traits. Specifically, it has become possible to estimate the contribution of ventilatory control to OSA severity (loop gain and arousal threshold), together with pharyngeal collapsibility and muscle compensation using automated techniques applied to respiratory signals collected in routine clinical PSG.
Understanding OSA pathophysiology is the key to OSA precision medicine.
Functional anatomy of the upper airway
The human upper airway is a multipurpose anatomical region serving respiration, deglutition and vocalisation. Because of these multiple functions, the pharyngeal airway lacks a rigid bony or cartilaginous support (which would make it more stable, but also less adaptable to dierent tasks); therefore, it is a deformable tube susceptible to collapse if sucient transmural pressure is applied across a compliant pharyngeal wall. The importance of an abnormal pharyngeal susceptibility to collapse in the pathogenesis of obstructive apnoeas was demonstrated by studying the pharyngeal P
in patients
crit
with OSA and in control subjects. Flow cannot occur until the pressure upstream of the collapsible segment exceeds the surrounding pressure, i.e. P increase in P
P
is negative (the airways stay open at atmospheric pressure), whereas OSA patients
crit
are more likely to have positive P
from normal subjects to snorers and OSA patients. In normal conditions,
crit
, which leads to upper airway collapse.
crit
. There is a progressive
crit
The loss of the drive to breathe during wakefulness results in decreased upper airway neuromuscular activity and responsiveness, leading to decreased calibre, increased resistance and an increased probability of pharyngeal collapse. The response to these physiological changes partly depends on the underlying susceptibility to pharyngeal collapse, which is determined by baseline upper airway calibre, surrounding tissue pressure (i.e. adipose tissue, vascular and mucosal factors and craniofacial structure) and the intrinsic properties of the upper airway. The thoracic–upper airway link via caudal (tracheal) traction might also influence the patency of the upper airway.
Structural factors
Support for the role of bony structures in the propensity for upper airway obstruction comes from observational and experimental studies. Dierences in position of the hyoid bone between patients with OSA and controls was largely determined by tongue volume, suggesting that inferior displacement of the hyoid bone in patients with OSA is due to relative tongue volume and increased surrounding pressure.
In a case–control study which used three-dimensional MRI, increased mandibular length was associated with decreased risk for OSA in men, but not in women. Indeed, OSA is more prevalent in men than in women, and the prevalence increases in both sexes with age, independent of body weight, yet the precise mechanism behind this dierence is not clear. It is unlikely that the variability in airway cross-sectional area or volume, which is larger in men than in women, plays a role. A more relevant measurement may be airway length, which seems to be predictive of pharyngeal collapsibility based on experimental measurements and computational modelling. Because a longer airway is more collapsible, pharyngeal airway length may explain at least in part the male predisposition to pharyngeal collapse. Epidemiological studies have highlighted that dierences in craniofacial indices may contribute to racial and ethnic dierences in the prevalence of sleep apnoea. For example, compared to Icelandic OSA patients, (male) Chinese patients have smaller so tissue volume, but larger so palate volume, as well as smaller retropalatal airway areas and smaller mandibular and maxillary structures.
46
ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
So-tissue characteristics
The upper airway lumen is surrounded by the so tissue of the neck, including connective, adipose, vascular and lymphatic tissue. Consequently, factors that increase surrounding tissue pressure tend to promote its narrowing. Several so-tissue factors are associated with higher risk of OSA, including increased tongue size, increased size of lateral pharyngeal walls and increased total so-tissue volume. Enlarged tonsils can raise the susceptibility to upper airway obstruction by encroaching on the pharyngeal lumen. Increased so tissue may be a heritable trait, as evidenced by the familial aggregation of so tissue structure in normal individuals and those with OSA, independent of BMI and neck circumference. Increased adipose tissue in the upper airway or the tongue secondary to obesity may also increase collapsing tissue pressure. Confirming diagnostic evidence, interventions that decrease surrounding tissue pressure such as tonsillectomy or weight loss have been seen to reduce OSA severity.
Overnight rostral fluid shi
During the day, fluid accumulates in the intravascular and interstitial spaces of the legs due to gravity, and is redistributed rostrally upon lying down at night. Some of this fluid may accumulate in the neck, increasing tissue pressure and causing the upper airway to narrow, thereby increasing its collapsibility and predisposing to OSA. This pathogenic mechanism is particularly important for patients with fluid-retaining states, such as HF, renal failure or venous insuciency, and reducing lower extremity fluid volume (e.g. compression stockings, diuresis) may attenuate this process.
Lung volume
Changes in lung volume during the respiratory cycle are related to changes in upper airway calibre. Independent of dilating muscle activity, there is an inspiratory increase and an expiratory decrease in upper-airway luminal size. In fact, pharyngeal cross-sectional area reaches a nadir at end expiration, especially in patients with sleep apnoea. Decreased lung volumes during sleep are associated with increased upper airway collapsibility, perhaps via a reduction in the longitudinal tension of the pharyngeal airway. This could be attributed to tracheal displacement playing a role in upper airway stability; indeed, inspiratory activity displaces the trachea caudally and stretches the connective tissue linking the trachea to the upper airway. From a mechanical standpoint, caudal traction promotes upper airway patency by increasing transmural pressure and stiening the pharyngeal wall.
Upper airway muscles
Since humans have no fixed bone to support the pharynx, it is maintained open by the surrounding musculature. The most important and studied pharyngeal dilator muscle is genioglossus, whose activity is characterised by a tonic (measured during expiration) and a phasic (displayed during inspiration) component, which are essential to prevent posterior collapse of the tongue when the pressure becomes negative in the compliant pharynx. The levator and tensor palatini advance and elevate the so palate, while the geniohyoid and stylopharyngeus oppose medial collapse of the lateral pharyngeal walls. Relaxation of these muscles during sleep and lack of sucient reactivation are key primary pathophysiological events leading to OSA. Thus, to maintain a patent upper airway while awake, OSA patients activate the upper airway dilators during wakefulness more than healthy subjects. At sleep onset, all individuals physiologically reduce the activity of the pharyngeal dilator muscle. This, together with anatomic predisposition and/or unstable control of breathing, oen leads to
47ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
a)
GenioglossusP
Epiglottic
Flow
b)
GenioglossusP
Epiglottic
Flow
https://t.me/medicina_free
OSA during the lighter stages of sleep. Epiglottic pressure swings and CO2 increase with deeper stages of sleep and during obstructive events, generally determining a reflexive reactivation of pharyngeal muscle with the consequent restoration of upper airway patency. This reflex is widely variable between individuals, with some showing eective recruitment and the ability to partially reopen the upper airway and increase ventilation during an obstructive respiratory event (muscle compensation), and others showing minimal or no upper airway muscle compensation during sleep (figure 2). Preventing the sleep-related relaxation of upper airway dilator muscles,
mask
pressure
mask
pressure
Figure 2. Examples of OSA patients with low versus high genioglossus responsiveness to negative upper airway pressure reflex during sleep. a) Genioglossus activity of a patient with OSA during manipulation of upper airway physiology using the CPAP drop technique. The patient is sleeping on CPAP at a therapeutic level that avoids flow limitation (see the Flow channel), when CPAP pressure is abruptly reduced for five breaths, inducing flow limitation. In this patient, the response of the genioglossus activity to the progressively more negative epiglottic pressure is minimal or absent. b) Genioglossus response to the same upper airway challenge performed with the CPAP drop in a patient with simple snoring without OSA. In this case, the progressive lowering of epiglottic pressure during the CPAP drop induces a proportional increase in genioglossus activity. P
: CPAP mask pressure. Reproduced from Perger et al. (2021) with permission.
mask
48
ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
and in particular the genioglossus, has become a successful strategy to develop alternative treatments for OSA. A surgically implanted device that stimulates the hypoglossal nerve which controls the genioglossus represents a treatment option to prevent upper airway collapse by increasing genioglossus activity through direct electrical stimuli in a selected population. Medical interventions targeting upper airway muscle activation have shown the most promising results in OSA treatment. Theoretically, during sleep, dilator muscles could be stimulated using medications if the specific neurotransmitters mediating their activity were identified. Over the past several years, advancements in the field of OSA pharmacotherapy have helped to refine the choice of monoamines that may be helpful in stimulating the upper airway dilator muscles. Specifically, the impairment of noradrenergic, histaminergic and muscarinic activity is thought to play a key role in the sleep-related hypotonia of pharyngeal muscles. The loss of pharyngeal muscle tone during sleep has been largely attributed to the withdrawal of endogenous noradrenergic drive and to active muscarinic inhibition at the hypoglossal motor pool, the latter especially during REM sleep, yet the role of histaminergic stimulation seems marginal in OSA. Thus, a combination of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and antimuscarinic medications taken at bedtime may provide a sucient stimulus to the pharyngeal dilator muscles to alleviate OSA in most patients.
Ventilatory drive and loop gain
Breathing is a complex automated process that, in passive, healthy conditions, goes unnoticed. Respiration originates in the brainstem, in separate areas that are intimately connected. These neural networks contribute to the generation and pacemaking of the rhythm of respiration, i.e. ventilatory drive. Ventilatory drive is influenced by mechanoreceptors within the lungs (i.e. stretch receptors, J-receptors, C-fibres) and peripheral and central chemoreceptors. The activity of mechanoreceptors is also conditioned by emotions and behaviour such as vocalisation, sneezing, coughing, etc. Therefore, ventilatory drive can be subdivided into mechanical-behavioural drive (or wake drive), which overall quantifies the mechanical load on the respiratory muscles and, in healthy conditions, is exquisitely state­dependent, and chemical drive. Of note, since oxygen contributes to chemosensitivity only during severe hypoxaemia, CO2 is the main determinant of chemical drive.
Regulation of chemical drive is fine-tuned by a precise negative feedback mechanism (loop gain) that keeps gas tension levels in the blood within homeostatic limits. Loop gain is the product of dierent components: 1) plant, namely the pulmonary response that processes gas tension variations following a ventilatory disturbance; 2) controller, which drives the ventilatory response to changes in gas tensions; and 3) mixing (with negligible physiological impact on breathing instability), which further adjusts gas tensions when the blood passes from the pulmonary capillary to the larger chest vessels.
Low loop gain leads to negligible changes in ventilation in response to larger variations in blood gas tensions; conversely, high loop gain, a marker of breathing instability, responds to minimal changes in blood gas tensions with an exaggerated increase in ventilation. Subsequently, this response becomes a disturbance itself and will propagate breathing instability at a rate determined by the plant (i.e. if the plant is high, it will lead to CO2 accumulation in the lungs in response to a minimal disturbance, which favours frequent further ventilatory disturbance) and at an amplitude determined by the controller. Of note, a high baseline chemical drive does not necessarily mean a high loop gain; rather, it can lead to decreased loop gain in healthy conditions (by reducing the plant). However, if the controller is increased by a larger magnitude than the decrease in the plant, a high drive will reflect a high loop gain.
49ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Loop gain is also a function of the lung-to-chemoreceptor circulation time, or circulatory delay, which influences the duration of each sleep apnoea cycle; however, since circulatory delay increases when cardiac output decreases, in otherwise healthy individuals with OSA, circulatory delay is generally not prolonged and does not contribute to greater loop gain and sleep apnoea severity.
Measuring ventilatory drive and loop gain with gold-standard techniques (e.g. rebreathing systems, intra-oesophageal catheterisation) requires dedicated sta, specialised equipment and high patient collaboration; however, a more feasible way to precisely estimate (through ventilators and PSG) ventilatory drive and loop gain has been introduced recently.
During sleep, in healthy conditions, wake drive falls to minimal levels and chemical drive becomes predominant. During sleep, chemical drive is also reduced compared to wakefulness, which leads to slightly higher CO2 levels (0.3–0.5 kPa (∼2–4 mmHg)) during sleep. A decreased chemical drive during sleep is generally accompanied by a lower or unchanged controller gain versus wakefulness, and a modestly higher plant gain. Overall, this may result in a higher loop gain during sleep versus wakefulness that, along with other mechanisms, increases susceptibility to a greater ventilatory instability during sleep. Such instability may be the precipitating factor for OSA exacerbation in predisposed individuals. Indeed, a high loop gain cyclically drives CO2 under the threshold for apnoea through recurring swings in chemical drive. This may seem reminiscent of CSA; however, in OSA, in contrast to CSA, flow reductions are always larger in magnitude than the reductions in drive, probably due to a mismatch between the neural drive to the pump and the pharyngeal muscles.
Elevated loop gain has been described as one of the nonanatomical determinants of OSA; however, in the prevailing view, OSA onset was mainly thought to follow a state­dependent loss of pharyngeal muscle function, with subsequent flow reduction and reflex increase in ventilatory drive. REM-predominant OSA specifically seemed to be highly influenced by a loss of preferential neural drive to the upper airway muscles, with lower controller and loop gain being protective mechanisms instead. Recently, withdrawal of chemical drive has been identified as a key feature of OSA pathogenesis in NREM and REM, where falls in drive closely accompany reductions in flow and pharyngeal muscle activity (figure 3).
Preventing breathing instability and dips in chemical drive is arguably a major goal to address OSA exacerbation during either NREM or REM. Oxygen administration was shown to have an eect on OSA severity in selected individuals and in combination with other medical agents. Similarly, increasing chemical drive via hypercapnia (and thus lowering loop gain through a reduction in the plant) proved eective in treating OSA in most patients. Acetazolamide was also shown to attenuate loop gain and the ventilatory response to arousal, another potential contributor to breathing instability. During a respiratory arousal, wake drive is reinstated, as well as the CO2 wake set point, and leads to an increase in ventilation: in the presence of an elevated loop gain, a further increase in chemical drive (consequence of a high controller) will add up through the course of the arousal and conduce additional breathing oscillations, due to CO2 intermittently sinking below the apnoea threshold.
Acetazolamide and novel carbonic anhydrase inhibitors such as sulthiame consistently reduced OSA in REM and NREM, through a reduction in plant gain and possibly an increase in ventilatory drive. Importantly, drugs or agents that promote a reduction in ventilatory drive, such as opioids, some benzodiazepines and ethanol, should be cautioned in OSA.
50
ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
300
Obstructive event
Ventilation (% eupnoea)
Ventilation (% eupnoea)
Ventilatory drive (% eupnoea)
https://t.me/medicina_free
c)
250
Drive
200
150
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
Ventilation
Time course
0
50
100
Ventilatory drive (% eupnoea)
Ventilation (% eupnoea)
Arousal threshold
Ventilation
Drive
Time course
50
150
b)
passiveVactive
V
100
120 a)
100
80
40
60
Arousal threshold
Obstructive event
50 100 250
Ventilatory drive (% eupnoea)
0 150 200 300
0
Ventilation (% eupnoea)
50 100 250
Ventilatory drive (% eupnoea)
0 150 200 300
0
20
300
e)
d)
250
100
150
200
60
80
0
50
100
Ventilatory drive (% eupnoea)
Ventilation (% eupnoea)
Arousal threshold
50 100 250
0 150 200 300
20
0
40
Figure 3. Legend overleaf.
51ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Respiratory arousal threshold
The respiratory arousal threshold is the level of ventilatory drive or inspiratory mechanical eort required to wake up an individual in response to the narrowing of the upper airway during sleep. Traditionally, respiratory arousals were considered necessary to reinstate upper airway patency aer a ventilatory disturbance; thus, a low arousal threshold was long thought to be protective from deep, event-related, hypoxaemia. It is now clear that the pharyngeal muscles can overcome respiratory obstruction without the onset of an arousal, yet the arousal is oen concurrent due to similar thresholds for upper airway reopening and arousal inception. In addition, respiratory arousals are responsible for increased sympathetic activation at event termination. Therefore, it has been postulated that a low arousal threshold is not only nonprotective in most cases, but also increases the risk of OSA exacerbation and OSA-related cardiovascular morbidity.
There are several reasons why a low arousal threshold is responsible for OSA pathogenesis in a third of cases, and even more frequently in certain populations. First, it produces sleep fragmentation and prevents deep sleep, notoriously protective against respiratory events. Second, with an arousal abruptly interrupting a respiratory event, there is less time and fewer respiratory stimuli (e.g. CO2 levels that ‘do not have time’ to increase enough) for the pharyngeal muscles to be eectively recruited; consequences are shorter event duration and more frequent event cycling. Third, arousals imply a ventilatory response with quick intrusions of wake drive and subsequent rapid CO2 swings (discussed earlier), which can contribute to further breathing instability and greater OSA severity; not surprisingly, shorter event duration is associated with elevated loop gain. Fourth, arousals are characterised by dierent levels of intensity, and greater arousal intensity is accompanied by larger ventilatory responses.
a) Endogram of an individual without OSA. The continuous black line illustrates median ventilation at each drive decile. Ventilation when the pharyngeal muscles are passive (V sits at the intersection between eupnoeic (i.e. 100%) ventilation and drive. Activation of pharyngeal muscles (V
active
already patent, even in passive conditions (ceiling eect). Ventilation does not fall significantly following reductions in drive (V range. b) Endogram illustrating drive-dependent OSA. Note the linear relationship between ventilation and drive (i.e. decrements in drive lead to corresponding falls in ventilation). In addition, dips in drive beyond V Although evocative of CSA, where the flow–drive ratio equals 1 and is represented by the identity line, in OSA, flow versus drive reductions are bigger (i.e. the endogram is more shied down and to the right (see also c). c) Ensemble average of ventilation and ventilatory drive signals in the OSA patient presented in b. Contrary to the common knowledge that respiratory events arise from preferential deficits in pharyngeal muscle function, here ventilation and drive fall in synchrony during the obstructive event, so that drive withdrawal is accompanied by a decline in ventilation of a similar slope. Conversely, ventilation increases when drive starts to be elevated. Shading represents 95% CI. d) Endogram of classic OSA. No relationship between ventilation and drive is evident. In addition, note that V muscle responsiveness and ventilatory compensation. However, similarly to b, at minimal drive levels (V
), there is a substantial drop in ventilation. e) Ensemble average of ventilation and
min
ventilatory drive signals in the OSA patient presented in d. The temporal association between ventilation and drive during the event course is lost (the continuous fall in ventilation is not matched by a parallel drop in drive, which in fact starts to increase soon into the event), thus OSA probably onsets from a state-dependent loss of pharyngeal muscle function (i.e. poor upper airway muscle responsiveness).
52
),
passive
) leads to negligible increases in ventilation as the upper airway is
, the area below V
min
(i.e. V
passive
min
) account for further reductions in ventilation.
active
). Shading represents interquartile
passive
<V
, which denotes poor pharyngeal
passive
ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine
The pathophysiological concept of upper airway obstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Since the respiratory arousal threshold can be quantified as the ventilatory drive needed to awaken, gold-standard measures include oesophageal catheterisation, or, although less reliable, surrogates such as recording of epiglottic or oesophageal pressure. Sensitive alternative methods to calculate the arousal threshold have been introduced using PSG or clinical parameters.
Increasing arousal threshold to improve OSA severity has been the object of several studies in recent years, due to wide pharmacological accessibility to arousal threshold modulation. Indeed, many hypnotics, such as trazodone, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem proved eective for increasing the respiratory arousal threshold (via decreasing brain arousability). However, in numerous studies in which increases in arousal threshold were observed, a parallel AHI drop was not evident. Arousal threshold was also targeted using an antagonist of serotonin receptors, pimavanserin, which was demonstrated to delay CO2-mediated arousal in animal models, yet preserving the upper airway response to arousal. Although preliminary analyses showed that increasing the duration of pimavanserin administration could lead to a beneficial eect on OSA severity, pimavanserin did not yield a systematic increase in the arousal threshold.
These results have questioned the importance of an increased arousal threshold as a major OSA pathogenic feature. It is debated whether the magnitude of increase in arousal threshold, which is not necessarily dose-dependent, was sucient to generate a meaningful AHI improvement. Additionally, the interaction with other OSA traits may play a role in yielding negligible changes in the AHI for significant arousal threshold variations; for example, delaying arousals in subjects with poor pharyngeal muscle responsiveness would allow limited clinical benefit and rather increase the risk of severe overnight hypoxaemia.
Assessment of endotypic traits
In the past, gold-standard measurements of pharyngeal collapsibility and other endotypic traits were based on manipulation of CPAP during sleep to assess the critical pressure at which the airway completely collapses (P remained limited to specialised physiology laboratories. Recently, an attempt has been made to identify simpler ways of measuring the entity of pharyngeal collapse (P
) and the related muscle compensation\responsiveness, with the goal of allowing
crit
widespread clinical use of these metrics. These models are based on the estimation of ventilatory drive during spontaneous breathing, and subsequently assess pharyngeal collapsibility, upper airway muscle compensation, arousal threshold and loop gain. Pharyngeal collapsibility has been identified as the level of ventilation that can be achieved at eupnoeic ventilatory drive (V of P
), where a more collapsible airway is captured by lower ventilation. Muscle
crit
compensation is the increase in ventilation that occurs in conjunction with a rise in ventilatory drive (from eupnoeic levels to the level that triggers arousal from sleep). Thus, compensation can be taken as the simple dierence between V where V
is the level of ventilation at maximum drive that can be achieved during
active
sleep (arousal threshold). More recently, other polysomnographic surrogate measures of collapsibility have been presented as candidate to clinically quantify V responsiveness. The concomitant assessment of V can be visualised on the patient endogram (examples are shown in figure 3) which represents the relationship between the ventilatory drive (x-axis) and actual ventilation (y-axis) during sleep for the whole night. The endogram derived from the clinical PSG, together with the automated calculation of loop gain, have the potential in the
). These procedures
crit
, the ventilatory equivalent
passive
active
, V
passive
and arousal threshold
active
and V
passive
passive
and
,
53ERS Handbook: Respiratory Sleep Medicine