Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6032_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
Figure 9
lumbar vertebrae; however, caution should be used at higher levels because the pars interarticularis becomes thinner and the pedicle diameter is smaller, which substantially increases the technical difficulty of screw placement and theoretically increases the risk of pars fracture or inadvertent cortical perforation.
38
Axial (A) and sagittal (B) illustration demonstrating the
trajectories for medial to lateral cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws and traditional trajectory (TT) pedicle screws. (Reproduced from Tortolani PJ, Stroh DA: Cortical bone trajectory technique for posterior spinal instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24[11]:755-761.)
Illustration demonstrating posterior and cross-sectional views of
Figure 10
traditional iliac screw fixation (A) and the S2-alar-iliac trajectory (B).
Techniques using facet and translaminar screws were originally described decades ago; however, the use of these techniques in posterior fixation has recently received renewed attention. Although facet and translaminar screws do not provide rigidity equivalent to that of pedicle screws, successful outcomes have been reported when these alternative screw techniques were used as adjuncts in anterior interbody fusion.
39
Iliac Fixation
Obtaining stable fixation and successful fusion across the lumbosacral junction in long multilevel constructs historically has been challenging for spine surgeons because of the largely cancellous nature of the S1 and S2 pedicles and the substantial forces concentrated on the transition zone from the mobile spine to the relatively rigid pelvis. The addition of pelvic fixation overcomes this challenge by placing fixation across the center of rotation of the pelvis and out of the plane of the remainder of the instrumentation. Initially, the Galveston technique involved the placement of an L-shaped rod between the tables of the ilium.40 With the advent of modern segmental instrumentation, the technique evolved to use screw fixation within the ilium.
Currently, multiple techniques are available to achieve fixation to the pelvis. Classic iliac fixation uses a starting point in or just medial to the posterior superior iliac spine. A long, large diameter screw is then inserted between the tables of the ilium in a caudal (20°-45°) and lateral (30°-45°) trajectory. Although this technique is relatively straightforward, it requires lateral connectors to join to the medial pedicle screw construct. Iliac screws are commonly removed because of symptomatic prominence. A more medial starting point on the posterior superior iliac spine can reduce implant prominence but makes connection of the remainder of the construct more difficult. Recently, an S2 starting point that is 2 to 4 mm lateral and 4 to 8 mm caudal to the S1 foramen and a trajectory proceeding through the sacral ala into the pelvis has gained popularity41 (Figure 10). In this S2-alar-iliac technique, the screw tulips are aligned with the remainder of the construct and are unlikely to be symptomatically prominent; however, because the screws cross the sacroiliac joint, irritation or degeneration of the sacroiliac
joint can result. Recent evidence suggests that the technique is associated with a lower revision rate.42 Biomechanical evaluation of both traditional iliac fixation or S2-alar-iliac screw fixation has not demonstrated significant differences in stiffness or load to failure.
43
Summary
Although the anatomy of the spine has not changed, the understanding of the relationships between the structures that make up the spine and the changes in these structures caused by aging, degeneration, and injury has advanced considerably in recent years. This understanding has implications in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal pathology and is essential knowledge for any surgeon treating patients with common and often debilitating spinal disorders and injuries.
Key Study Points
A detailed knowledge of spine anatomy is a prerequisite for safe and effective nonsurgical and surgical treatment of patients with spine pathology. Growing evidence exists that the health and function of the multifidus muscles has an effect on clinical function in the lumbar spine. The freehand technique for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation is safe and effective. In patients with spine deformity, the relationship of the great vessels to the spine may be altered. The morphology and degenerative state of the vertebral end plate is an important consideration when applying interbody instrumentation. Techniques for lumbar and lumbosacral instrumentation are evolving. Increasing evidence supports the safety and efficacy of the cortical bone screw trajectory and S2-alar-iliac fixation.
Annotated References
1. Abdel-Meguid EM: An anatomical study of the human lumbar ligamentum flavum. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2008;13(1):11-16.
2. Scaal M: Early development of the vertebral column. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2016;49:83-
91.
The authors present a thorough and updated review of the embryology of the spine.
3. Johal J, Loukas M, Fisahn C, Chapman JR, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS: Hemivertebrae: A comprehensive review of embryology, imaging, classification, and management. Childs Nerv Syst 2016;32(11):2105-2109.
A review on the development and classification of vertebral bony anomalies is presented.
4. Choi MK, Kim SB, Park CK, Lee SH, Jo DJ: Relation of deep paraspinal muscles’ cross-sectional area of the cervical spine and bone union in anterior cervical decompression and fusion: A retrospective study. World Neurosurg 2016;96:91-100.
This MRI study demonstrated that the increased cervical extensor cross-sectional area is associated with higher fusion rate after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.
5. Kim CW: Scientific basis of minimally invasive spine surgery: Prevention of multifidus muscle injury during posterior lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(26suppl):S281-S286.
6. Smuck M, Crisostomo RA, Demirjian R, Fitch DS, Kennedy DJ, Geisser ME: Morphologic changes in the lumbar spine after lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: A quantitative radiological study. Spine J 2015;15(6):1415-1421.
This retrospective, MRI-based study demonstrated a significant increase in the severity of disk degeneration after radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy compared with degeneration at nonablated levels. No change in the multifidus cross-sectional area or facet deterioration was reported.
7. Goubert D, Oosterwijck JV, Meeus M, Danneels L: Structural changes of lumbar muscles in non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Pain Physician 2016;19(7):E985-E1000.
The cross-sectional area and fat content of paraspinal musculature in patients with chronic recurrent and acute low back pain was examined. The most consistent finding was paraspinal muscle atrophy (specifically in the multifidus) in patients with chronic low back pain.
8. Kim JY, Ryu DS, Paik HK, et al: Paraspinal muscle, facet joint, and disc problems: Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion. Spine J 2016;16(7):867-875.
This case-control study demonstrated that a higher body mass index, preexisting facet and intervertebral disk degeneration, paraspinal muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration are risk factors for adjacent-segment degeneration.
9. Kim CW, Siemionow K, Anderson DG, Phillips FM: The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery. Instr Course Lect 2011;60:353-370.
A review of the basis for and techniques used in minimally invasive spine surgery procedures is presented. Both potential advantages and limitations are addressed.
spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: A review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6(2):104-112.
positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(18):2024-2029.
using EOS imaging: Normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 2015;24(1):63-71.
This radiographic cohort study analyzed the sagittal balance of healthy volunteers and the relationship of cervical lordosis to newly defined cranial parameters, including the cranial incidence, which is analogous to pelvic incidence in the lumbosacral spine.
Important considerations for correction of spinal deformity. Spine J 2016;S1529­9430(16)30028-6.
The authors compared sagittal alignment and pelvic parameters in 58 patients with back pain of less than 3 months’ duration that resulted in no substantial deformity in the standing or sitting positions. When seated, there was a reduction in lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis with forward displacement of the sagittal vertical axis and increased pelvic tilt and cervical lordosis compared with those parameters when standing.
spinal balance: Normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(22):E1193-E1198.
craniocervical junction-a sequential sectioning of its stabilizing structures. Spine J 2015;15(7):1618-1628.
Modern robotic testing with pure moments and six degrees of freedom were used during
serial sectioning of the ligaments of the occipitocervical complex. Results emphasize the importance of the occipitoatlantal joint capsules in restraining occipitoatlantal motion and reaffirm the primary role of the cruciate ligament in atlantoaxial stability.
injuries of the occipitocervical complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(9):709-714.
The authors report on a retrospective CT-based study of occipitocervical complex injuries in patients with polytrauma at a level 1 trauma center. The injuries were not initially diagnosed on the neuroradiology report. It was determined that no injuries would be missed using the criteria of a basion-dens interval greater than 10 mm and a lateral mass interval of 4 mm or greater to define occipitocervical complex injuries.
craniocervical dislocations: The role of the occipitoatlantal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(6):1602-1613.
Using retrospective CT and MRI data, the authors defined two distinct atlantoaxial injury patterns: type I, isolated atlantoaxial injuries with an intact occipitoatlantal capsule and type II injuries, combined occipitoatlantal-atlantoaxial injuries, which are associated with a higher rate of complete spinal cord injury.
Anatomical variations of the foramen transversarium in cervical vertebrae: Findings, review of the literature, and clinical significance during cervical spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2016;25(12):4132-4139.
This anatomic study using cadaver skeletons demonstrated significant variation in the size and position of the foramen transversarium of the cervical spine.
complex for transarticular screw fixation. J Neurosurg 1996;85(2):221-224.
Anatomo-surgical guide. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(12):945-950.
Pertinent anatomy for C1-C2 posterior instrumentation using the Harms technique is reviewed.
Demographic aspects in cervical vertebral bodies’ size and shape (C3-C7): A skeletal study. Spine J 2017;17(1):135-142.
Results of a cross-sectional cadaver study to establish normative values for the size and shape of cervical vertebrae (C3-C7) are presented.
Analysis of 1662 screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24(7):415-420.
A retrospective review of 225 patients who underwent posterior cervical lateral mass instrumentation found that revision surgery was required in 6.2% of the patients because of nerve injury, hematoma formation, pseudarthrosis, or screw pullout.
screws to the spinal nerves: A comparison of the Magerl, Anderson, and An techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24(19):2057-2061.
cervical spine with the use of lateral mass versus cervical pedicle screws: A systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19(5):614-623.
This systematic review of the literature compared the complications of posterior cervical lateral mass fixation and pedicle screw fixation. A low rate of vertebral artery injury was reported with pedicle screw fixation, but the rate was higher than that of lateral mass screw fixation.
morphometric study of thoracic spine and its relevance to anaesthetic and spinal surgical procedures. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2016;7(2):101-108.
A CT-based study of 50 patients (600 thoracic vertebrae) without spine disorders was undertaken to determine normative anatomic data for pedicle width, length, and height; transverse pedicle angles; chord length; canal dimensions; body width and height; spinous process angle; and transverse process length.
thoracic spine: Part I. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77(8):1193-1199.
of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine (Phila Pa
1976) 1989;14(4):367-372.
size on thoracic spinal canal dimensions: An anatomic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39(20):E1195-E1200.
This cadaver study of 162 pedicles from 81 fresh-frozen thoracic vertebrae demonstrated that, as pedicles expand with larger screws, expansion occurs in a lateral direction in 99.3% of vertebrae. This expansion does not affect spinal canal diameter.
placement in the thoracic spine: Is it safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(3):333-342, discussion 342.
technique” for safe pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 2014;23(suppl 4):S452-S456.
The authors report on a freehand technique for thoracic pedicle instrumentation. This technique takes advantage of the contrast between the column of cancellous bone within the pedicle and the cortical anterior wall of the transverse process.
spinal deformity. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14(1):e7.
in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: A magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw placement relative to structures at risk. Eur Spine J 2008;17(5):657-662.
vertebrae in patients with Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa
1976) 2016;41(7):585-590.
CT images were used to identify the position of the aorta relative to the spine in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Type 1A and 1C curves had a high risk of aortic injury at T11 when a 40-mm screw was used, even if angular error was less than 10°.
assisted methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J 2011;20(6):846-859.
The results of systematic review of comparing accuracy of pedicle screw placement with and without the assistance of image guidance are presented. Image guidance improved the accuracy of screw placement. There was no strong evidence that any one specific navigation system was superior to another.
correlation with MRI findings of lumbar degeneration. J Biomech 2016;49(4):586-593.
This cadaver study demonstrated an increase in strength and stiffness of lumbar end plates from the center to the periphery, and in more caudal vertebrae. An inverse relationship between the grade of degeneration and end plate strength and stiffness was shown.
disc decompression following endplate damage: Implications for disc degeneration depend on spinal level and age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38(17):1473-1481.
This cadaver study demonstrated that fracture of the end plate resulting from compressive overload leads to decreased nucleus pulposus pressures and increases stress in the posterior anulus. The effect was more severe at higher spinal levels and in older patients.
after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of 1070 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37(13):1164-1169.
A retrospective review of 1,070 patients who underwent single- or multi-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion found that a pear-shaped disk space, inclusion of L5-S1, multilevel fusion, and a wide disk space with instability were risk factors for cage retropulsion.
instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24(11):755-761.
A detailed review of the technique and current state of the evidence for the application of a cortical bone trajectory for posterior instrumentation of the lumbar spine is presented.
spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24(6):357-364.
The authors present a detailed review of the history, technique, and outcomes of various methods for posterior lumbar spine fixation, including pedicle, cortical, facet, and translaminar screws.
scoliotic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1982;7(3):276-284.
1976) 2010;35(25):2245-2251.
complications than iliac screws in adult lumbosacropelvic fixation. Spine (Phila Pa
1976) 2017;42(3):E142-E149.
This retrospective review of outcomes of patients treated using S2-alar-iliac fixation or traditional iliac screw fixation found that the S2-alar-iliac technique had lower rates of revision and surgical site infection than the traditional fixation technique. Similar clinical outcomes were reported for both techniques. Level of evidence: IV.
spinopelvic fixation constructs: Iliac screw versus S2-alar-iliac screw. Spine Deform 2016;4(1):10-15.
This cadaver biomechanical study reported no statistical difference in stiffness and load-to-failure between S2-alar-iliac screws and traditional iliac screw fixation.