Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6032_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
22 Мб
Скачать
short distance into the foramen. The spinal cord can be assessed for focal or diffuse thickening of caliber if concern exists for active myelitis or cord tumor or for cord thinning in the setting of myelomalacia. The degree of narrowing of the thecal sac and spinal canal, deformity of the cord, and the presence of obstruction of CSF flow are well shown. However, the internal architecture of the cord is not well assessed using myelography. Nerve roots can be evaluated for thickening and/or compression with myelography. MRI findings may underestimate the degree of nerve root compression in the lateral recess compared with CT myelograms and may underestimate the width of the spinal canal and neural foramina. Myelography and CT myelography also allow dynamic imaging, both temporally for the evaluation of thecal sac filling and to assess for site of leakage in patients with intracranial hypotension.
Relative contraindications to myelography include the presence of a coagulopathy or anticoagulation medicine. Use of the anticoagulant usually needs to be withheld for a variable length of time before the procedure. The presence of iodinated contrast material in the subarachnoid spaces also can reduce the threshold for seizure, especially in the presence of certain medications. These medications (mostly antidepressant and antipsychotic medications) are often withheld for 48 hours before and 24 hours following the procedure.9 It is important to consult with the performing radiologist and/or the prescribing clinician to answer any questions about whether a medication needs to be or can safely be withheld for the procedure.
The same precautions used with CT also need to be used with myelography, including the risks of radiation to pregnant and pediatric patients or in patients who may have an allergy to iodinated contrast.
10
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI uses a strong magnetic field along with a series of radiofrequency waves to render representations of the contents of the body. The magnetic field strength of the current units most commonly used are 1.5 Tesla (15,000 gauss) and 3.0 Tesla (30,000 gauss), with lesser strengths available for open and office-based MRI systems. Because of the high magnetic field strength, the installation and use of the machines is highly regulated because patients or staff with implanted ferromagnetic materials and certain devices cannot be
Figure 4
near the unit.
Magnetic resonance images of the cervical spine
demonstrate a spinal canal dermoid. T1-weighted (A) and fast T2-weighted (B) images show fat with bright signal intensity in the dermoid. C, Short tau inversion recovery sequence nulls the fat signal in the dermoid. D, Contrast material–enhanced T1-weighted image with fat saturation nulls the fat content signal in the dermoid and subcutaneous tissues.
A major benefit of MRI over CT and radiography is that no ionizing radiation is used. Therefore, MRI is an excellent modality for imaging in patients who will need to undergo multiple follow-up examinations; for imaging in children, who are more sensitive to the effects of ionizing radiation; and for imaging in pregnant patients. MRI is ideal for imaging the paraspinal soft tissues, disks, epidural space, neural foramina, and contents of the thecal sac, including the spinal cord and nerve roots.
MRI Sequences
When imaging the spine, several different sequences are commonly used. The two most well known and used are T1- and T2-weighted sequences (most clinical protocols use fast T2-weighted sequences). The T1-weighted sequences show fat as appearing bright (hyperintense) and water as dark (hypointense); T2-weighted sequences (fast spin-echo) show fat as bright and water also as being bright. A fat saturation method can be used to null the fat signal intensity (or turn it hypointense) on the T1-weighted and (fast) T2­weighted sequences. Alternatively, a short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence can be used to obtain similar results by changing the bright T2 fat
signal intensity to a dark signal. Using either T2-weighting with fat saturation or a STIR sequence, the bright fat is removed to accentuate the edema/fluid in the T2-weighted images. This helps identify pathologic processes in the bone marrow, spinal canal, and paraspinal soft tissues (Figure 4).
In the spine, T1-weighted sequences are primarily used to evaluate the signal intensity of bone marrow. Bone marrow is typically hyperintense on T1-weighted sequences because of the high fat content within the marrow in adults (children with a greater concentration of cellular hematopoietically active marrow would show relatively dark signal intensity on a T1-weighted sequence because of the reduced composition of fat). The fatty content of the marrow can be assessed by comparing it with the intervertebral disks and paraspinal muscles. If marrow appears darker than the paraspinal muscles in adults, then a pathologic process should be considered. This is true for both diffuse (lymphoma, leukemia) and focal (myeloma, metastasis, edema) processes. Benign processes that cause diffuse low signal intensity in the marrow are a result of the conversion to red marrow, such as in the setting of anemia or rebound activation of the marrow following chemotherapy. Focal marrow lesions that are bright on T1-weighted sequences are almost always benign and usually represent hemangiomas (which have a high fat content), with exceptions including hemorrhagic blood products (Figure 5). Fractures are often seen well on T1-weighted sequences, showing up as a hypointense signal line through the fatty marrow, with varying degrees of confluent surrounding hypointense signal intensity representing edema.
T1-weighted sequences are also well suited for the evaluation of the epidural space and of the contents of the neural foramina because both have high adipose content. Any pathologic process that results in filling in or replacement of the normal fat in these locations should result in close attention given to these regions on the other sequences.
Figure 5
Sagittal spine magnetic resonance images show
hemangiomas at L1 and L5 (arrows). A, T1-weighted image shows the bright signal intensity of the fat content in the lesion. B, T2­weighted image also shows the bright fat in the hemangioma. C, Short tau inversion recovery sequence shows the fat signal nulled, with a small amount of fluid of the hemangioma in L1.
The disks and paraspinal muscles show up as intermediate to dark signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences, with ligaments appearing dark on all sequences because of their relative lack of fluid. T1-weighted sequences are good for the evaluation of ligaments in the setting of trauma to assess for discontinuity. Most other pathologies, including infectious and inflammatory processes, are better evaluated on the T2-weighted and STIR sequences.
On T2-weighted sequences, marrow also shows up as bright, although slightly less so than on T1 sequences. The cartilaginous end plates show up as dark signal. The disks are hyperintense centrally in the nucleus pulposus, with a thin peripheral rim of hypointense signal intensity arising from the anulus fibrosus. Most pathology will show up as bright signal intensity on T2-weighted images, including edema related to fracture as well as infectious and inflammatory processes. CSF appears bright on T2-weighted images, resulting in excellent contrast with the spinal cord and nerve roots, which show up as dark. T2-weighted sequences are well suited for the evaluation of spinal cord signal and to evaluate for nerve root compression of the intrathecal portions of the nerves. T2-weighted images also show good
delineation of the nerve roots in the neural foramina because they are surrounded by hyperintense fat.
Disk pathology is well seen on T2-weighted sequences, including loss of disk height and disk desiccation (appearing as darkening of the disk on T2­weighted images because of fluid loss). Annular tears (linear or irregular bright signal), disk protrusions, disk extrusions, and resultant thecal sac and neural foraminal encroachment are well evaluated on T2-weighted sequences.
Gadolinium contrast agent administration may help when concern exists for neoplasm (Figure 6) or infection (Figure 7) or for the evaluation of the postoperative lumbar spine. Gadolinium results in shortening of the T1 signal because of paramagnetic effects of the heavy metal, resulting in increased signal intensity. In the postoperative lumbar spine, recurrent or residual disk protrusions/extrusions and granulation tissue have similar signal intensity on the non–contrast enhanced sequences, and differentiation between the two is difficult. With the administration of gadolinium agents, granulation tissue should be enhanced, whereas the disk will remain dark (but often with a thin rim of surrounding enhancement).
MRI and Spinal Fixation Hardware
Although MRI is generally considered to be safe in the presence of spinal fixation hardware, the makeup of the material (iron, cobalt, nickel, stainless steel) can affect the images by substantial artifact degradation attributable to susceptibility effects of ferromagnetic materials, which could render the images nondiagnostic. Some techniques can be used with MRI to reduce the effects of metal artifact degradation. This degradation is becoming less of an issue as titanium implants are more commonly used.
11
Figure 6
Sagittal T1-weighted spine magnetic resonance images
obtained before (A) and after (B) contrast material administration show diffuse enhancement of the vertebral body infiltrated by a tumor (arrow).
In general, magnetic susceptibility effects are less at lower field strengths, so 1.5 Tesla is preferred to 3.0 Tesla or higher field strength. Most imaging centers have set sequences available called metal artifact reduction sequences. Adjusting technical imaging parameters of voxels, matrix size, and bandwidth can minimize the artifact.
11
MRI Safety
MRI can result in a safety hazard to a subset of patients and staff. Therefore, an extensive screening process needs to be implemented before allowing anyone to enter the environment of the magnetic field. For patients who will be in the imager, the screening process involves filling out a form about
Figure 7
history of surgery, implanted devices, and the possibility of foreign metallic bodies, including any history of working with metal, for which concern exists for the presence of metal fragments within the orbit. Any patient who answers positively to any question will require further evaluation to assess the exact nature of the foreign device or material to determine if MRI is safe to perform. The materials that can cause a safety hazard are composed of ferromagnetic material, which can result in heating/burning or dislodgement/torque that can injure the surrounding tissues.
Sagittal short tau inversion recovery sequence magnetic
resonance images obtained from a patient with discitis show edema in the disk space and adjacent bone marrow and diffuse enhancement (arrow) before (A) and after (B) contrast material administration.
Implanted devices are designated as MRI safe, MRI conditional, or MRI unsafe. MRI-safe devices should not cause any adverse effects when exposed to the magnetic field or the radiofrequency pulses within the unit. MRI­conditional devices have several requirements as designated by the manufacturer that need to be followed to safely perform imaging. As long as these recommendations are adhered to, MRI poses no known hazards for patients with MRI-conditional devices.
8,12
It is important to keep in mind that
some devices are only suitable for imaging certain parts of the body (such as
only the brain or extremities), and torso or spine imaging may be excluded. Clear identification of the manufacturer and device model number is mandatory before permitting the patient to undergo MRI.
All facilities that contain an MRI unit are required to have zones set up that are clearly demarcated and allow safe movement of people within and around the MRI environment. Zone 1 includes all areas that are freely accessible by the public. Zone 2 is still a public area but serves as an interface between public zone 1 and strictly controlled zone 3. Patient screening often occurs in zone 2. Zone 3, which usually consists of the control room where the technologist works, needs to be separated by a locked door that allows ready access only by prescreened staff. Zone 4 is the imaging room. Any time zone 3 or 4 is entered, it is important to adhere to the technologist’s requests to ensure everyone’s safety. This adherence is critical especially in urgent situations of patient decompensation or cardiopulmonary arrest, which requires multiple members of the code team who may be unfamiliar with the risks of the magnetic field.
Gadolinium agents also can result in a safety hazard to patients. The major concerns associated with gadolinium are the possibility of an allergic­type reaction and of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, a disease that can result in fibrosis of the skin and internal organs related to the administration of gadolinium-containing agents in patients with renal insufficiency. Gadolinium-based contrast agents are not considered nephrotoxic at the routinely administered doses.
Allergic-type reactions to gadolinium agents, although less frequent and often less severe than the reactions that patients have to iodinated CT contrast agents, are serious and treated with the same intensity. These are not true allergic reactions because patients can have a reaction without ever having been exposed to the agent before and often will not consistently have the reaction with every subsequent exposure. An antigen-antibody response is not always identified. Therefore, the responses are currently considered an idiosyncratic reaction, and can consist of rash, hives, throat swelling, difficulty breathing, or anaphylactoid reactions resulting in hypotension, cardiorespiratory failure, and death. As with iodinated contrast reactions, patients should be premedicated with a regimen of corticosteroids with or without an antihistamine before injection to attempt to decrease the risk of injection and a different contrast agent may be used. For more severe
reactions, consideration should be given to performing a noncontrast study. If contrast is absolutely necessary, the study should be performed in the hospital setting with trained staff and appropriate anesthesia support available.
4
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis can result in fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, similar to systemic scleroderma. Gadolinium has been found in the affected tissues. The group most commonly affected is patients with stage IV renal failure who are undergoing routine hemodialysis, but it has also been seen, albeit less frequently, in patients with acute renal failure or lesser degrees of chronic renal insufficiency. Gadolinium-based agents are usually considered safe in patients with chronic renal failure who have an eGFR greater than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, but the agents should be used cautiously in patients with acute renal failure or with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
4,13
If contrast is deemed necessary, a risk-benefit assessment should be performed and there should be direct discussion between the referring clinician and approving radiologist. The patient also should be made aware of the risks associated with the gadolinium-based agent and informed consent should be obtained.
MRI Guidelines and Recommendations
For cervical trauma, the AUC of the ACR consider MRI an appropriate and complementary imaging modality to CT.1 MRI also is the study of choice for patients with neurologic symptoms concerning for spinal cord injury, hematoma, or disk herniation, as well as ligamentous injury. Some controversy exists regarding the use of MRI in patients with normal CT examination findings. The ACR suggests using MRI in patients whose neurologic status cannot be fully evaluated after 48 hours, even with normal CT examination results.
1
For lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, MRI is suggested as the most appropriate noninvasive test for imaging spinal stenosis by North American Spine Society guidelines.2 In patients with clinical concern for disk herniation, MRI is the recommended study of choice, but CT myelography should be performed in patients for whom MRI is contraindicated. For lumbar spinal stenosis, MRI is recommended as the most appropriate imaging study, with CT myelography performed for patients in whom MRI is contraindicated. In addition, workgroup consensus suggests MRI as the first­line diagnostic study for patients with spinal stenosis.
14
Imaging recommendations for low back pain are evolving. For uncomplicated acute low back pain, the ACR suggests no imaging studies because the pain is a benign self-limiting process. However, in patients with red flags for serious injury or with prolonged pain after medical management, MRI is recommended, although many payers will require radiographic evaluation prior to approving MRI.1 Many patients have no correlative abnormal imaging findings. Also, imaging abnormalities can exist in people without back pain. As summarized by the AUC of the ACR, the challenge for practicing physicians is to identify the small subgroup of patients within the large population that requires spinal imaging in whom serious disease should be suspected.
1
Nuclear Scintigraphy and PET
Bone scintigraphy and PET are the modalities most often used in the diagnosis of spine disease. Bone scintigraphy (also called bone scanning) is useful for bone lesions, including the spine, and used less for soft tissues. The isotope technetium Tc-99 methylene diphosphonate (99Tc MDP) and planar or multiplanar single-photon emission computed tomography images are obtained a few hours after injection. 99Tc MDP binds to hydroxyapatite crystals in proportion to local blood flow and osteoblastic activity, making the agent a good marker for bone turnover and bone perfusion.
Fractures, osteomyelitis, and osteolytic metastatic tumors (Figure 8) all show increased “hot” activity in the bone scan. Occasionally, areas that show a lack of activity (“cold”) may exist in aggressive metastatic lesions, indolent healing abscesses, plasmacytomas, or disruption of blood flow such as with bone infarcts or prostheses.