Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1029_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
25 Мб
Скачать
96
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
N. Patel et al.
daunting prospect for the patient, and even minor complications can be very challenging for patients and family. Appropriate patient and staff education in the preoperative period not only is key in pre­venting complications from arising, but also increases the success of interventions that may be required. In effect, the preoperative management plan serves to set one up for the best possible suc­cess in managing any intraoperative or postopera­tive challenges that may arise.
It is helpful to think about complications in three broad categories: (a) patient related, (b) donor site related, and (c) free ap related. The best and most effective management of complications is to pre­vent them from happening, and this is the central aim of the preoperative workup. Patient-related characteristics can contribute signicantly to anes­thetic and surgical risk, as well as predispose the patient to the development of complications in the immediate postoperative period. These are well characterized, and workup for these conditions is described in other chapters of this book covering medical and surgical assessment and optimization as well as patient education. With respect to donor site-related challenges, the choice of the reconstruc­tive ap determines the donor site. It is prudent to consider several donor sites in the same patient in case of ap failure, or the need for alternative or additional free tissue transfer. The chapter in this book on surgical assessment describes an approach to addressing possible risks. Finally, in regard to free ap-related issues, Corbitt etal. [3] describe the causes of head and neck free ap failure in their series as follows: infection—25%, kinked or com­pressed pedicle—23%, ap design- and harvest­related issues—15%, hemorrhage—7%, and hypercoagulable disorders—5%. It is important that the patient who is predisposed to infection or might have an undiagnosed systemic clotting or bleeding disorder is identied in the preoperative period. The patient who has had previous free ap failures should, in our opinion, be considered for a nutrition screen and hypercoagulability workup prior to sur­gery. CT angiograms of the planned ap site as well as the neck vessels may be of some benet in this cohort of patients.
Management of ap complications will often involve a return to the operating room with the need for salvage procedures and, in the event of
catastrophic failure, institution of the “reverse reconstructive ladder” [4]. The surgeon should understand that the likely alternative treatments could involve, in descending order of preference, a second free ap, a regional ap, conservative care with debridement and closure with local aps, and skin grafts or healing via secondary intention. In some cases, a combination of sev­eral of these modalities may be required [5].
Intraoperative Phase
Intraoperative complications for free tissue trans­fer have been well established in the literature, and common intraoperative causes of ap failure must be noted by the treating surgeon so that steps can be taken to avoid them or at the very least mini­mize them. Several factors must be considered, and these include prolonged operative time, mor­phology and position of the vascular pedicle at the recipient site, patients who have been previously irradiated in the recipient site, the surgeon’s level of experience, operative techniques, the incidence of vessel spasms, formation of thromboses, as well as the development of hematomas.
Prolonged Operative Time
A prolonged operative time has been identied as an independent risk factor for failure in head and neck free ap surgery. In a retrospective national database study conducted by Ishimaru et al. [6], 2846 patients were identied and found that a pro­longed operative time was signicantly associated with free ap failure. Serletti etal. [7] reported that an operative time longer than 10h was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complica­tions including thrombosis, hematoma, bleeding, and ultimately free ap failure. Longer operative times resulting in prolonged ischemic periods increase the incidence of ap damage due to tissue hypoxia and anoxia [8]. In order to reduce operative and ischemic times, a two-team approach and the availability of dual-recipient vessels, especially in irradiated patients, are recommended.
Surgeon’s Expertise
It has been reported that surgical technique con­stitutes the most important component of free
6 Free Flap Considerations andComplications
97
ap success [9]. In a study by Zhou etal. [10], the two surgeons who performed the microvas­cular anastomoses (XP and YW) both had more than 5 years of experience in microvascular anastomosis, and thus had a standardized proto­col: (1) selection of a recipient vessel of the same diameter as the donor vessel, (2) removal of the attached soft tissue from the anastomosis site, (3) widening of the diameters of both the donor and recipient vessels by pressing micro­forceps against the inner membrane of the ves­sels, (4) irrigation with heparin before anastomosis, (5) gentle suturing of the vessels without tension, (6) checking the patency after vessel anastomosis, (7) adjusting the position of vessels to ensure no blind bend, and (8) use of papaverine to prevent vasospasm. Good vessel selection plays a signicant role in the success of free tissue transfer. Most surgeons agree that the facial and superior thyroid arteries, as well as the common facial vein and internal jugular vein branches, are the most suitable for anasto­mosis. In a study conducted in Shanghai cover­ing a 34-year period and including 4640 aps, authors showed that the facial and superior thy­roid vessels were the most reliable, as these ves­sels are in close proximity to head and neck defects and the caliber of these vessels is similar to that of the donor vessels often used in recon­struction [11]. Having said this, irradiated patients can demonstrate signicant changes in vessel quality, with increased friability, intimal changes, and calcications, and as such, these vessels may not be adequate for anastomosis. In this case, the surgeon must be prepared to change vessels, electing to use the external carotid artery, contralateral vessels, ipsilateral transverse cervical vessels, or internal mam­mary vessels for anastomosis. The ability to pivot in this scenario becomes crucial to achieve higher success rates. It is important to note that the choice of ap type has not been associated with changes in free ap success rates. Kwok and Agarwal [12] examined overall ap failure rates based on the ap type (muscle, fascial, skin, bone, and bowel ap) in 1187 cases and concluded that there were no signicant associ­ations between ap type and known risk factors for ap failure (p=0.464).
Vessel Spasm andThrombosis
There are several causes of vessel spasms and thrombosis, in both arterial and venous sys­tems, and these must be considered in all cases of free tissue transfer. First, hypotension is considered a common cause of arterial throm­bosis in free ap transfers, with the reduction in blood ow through the anastomosed vessel increasing the propensity of thrombosis. A thrombosed artery will often appear as a bulge at the thrombosed site, many times permitting visual identication of the thrombus. Moreover, the use of a handheld Doppler will conrm whether blood ow is present or not. A second risk factor for thrombosis is called “back-wall­ing,” where the opposite side of the arterial wall is sutured by mistake, resulting in intimal damage and potential thrombosis. Vessel spasms in and of themselves also serve as risk factors for the development of clots, as they can stagnate blood ow. Another cause for arterial thrombosis is the presence of bends or inadequate removal of the attached tissue from the donor and recipient vessels. Therefore, if the handheld Doppler conrms inadequate blood ow after anastomosis, the surgeon must take steps to rectify the situation. This involves communication with the anesthesia team to increase the mean arterial pressure, applying papaverine to the anastomosis site, removal of excessive fascial tissue from the anastomosed vessel, as well as checking for any kinking in the vessels. If after all of this blood ow is still inadequate, anastomosis should be opened and redone, while checking for intimal damage and cutting back or changing vessels when neces­sary. The application of papaverine during anastomosis has been found to increase carotid artery blood ow in humans [13]. Similarly, it has been found that the local application of papaverine during vascular anastomosis could sustain anastomotic dilatation. In a systematic review of 20 articles, Vargas et al. [14] con­cluded that papaverine could produce a 66% increase in vessel diameter, and that it pos­sesses signicant vasodilatory effects on non­spastic vessels [15]. Papaverine acts directly on calcium channels causing a direct increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate and subse-
98
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
N. Patel et al.
quent increases in secondary messengers that leads to protein kinase activation and nonselec­tive smooth muscle relaxation and vessel dila­tion. One practical way to reduce vessel spasm is to inject papaverine or lidocaine into the fas­cia of the pedicle during ap harvest. It is also important to mention that thrombosis will occur if the vessel endothelium is not intact during anastomosis; therefore, it is important to protect the intima without interruption or damage during anastomosis.
Venous failure can also occur due to compres­sion, spasm, and thrombosis and is a common cause of intraoperative ap complications, as venous thrombosis occurs more frequently than arterial thrombosis. It is often very easy to kink or twist the vein during or after anastomosis, and careful attention should be paid to prevent this. Additionally, the choice of an adequate recipient vein is very important for ap success, with good vessel caliber matching and a tensionless anasto­mosis playing an important role. While the exter­nal jugular vein is often very easily accessible, sometimes authors do not recommend its use due to its supercial position in the neck with the risk of being easily compressible. Despite this, in our experience with the external jugular vein, we have not found this to be the case and have represented a reliable recipient vein. However, the lingual vein should also be avoided, as anastomosis to this vein may be difcult due to its cranial position under the mandible. At the conclusion of surgery, special attention should be made to monitor the patient while the anesthesia team is extubating the patient. As the patient emerges from anesthesia, it is important to stabilize the neck and observe for rises in the patient’s blood pressure, as well as pre­vent patients from moving about forcefully, as these can result in increases in intravascular pres­sure, with the risk of bleeding and subsequent hematoma formation, which could lead to venous compression and thrombosis.
Intraoperative Fluid Administration
Another critical risk factor associated with intra­operative free ap failure is excessive intraopera­tive uid administration. Haughey et al. [16]
hypothesized that edema of the ap or recipient site can result from increased volumes of crystal­loids, reporting a critical cutoff value of 7l of crystalloids during surgery, with volumes higher than this linked to major ap complications. Moreover, Ruttmann etal. [17] suggested that the use of crystalloids, as compared to colloids, can result in a hypercoagulable state, especially when administered rapidly, thus increasing the risk of thrombosis intraoperatively. In their study, Brinkman et al. [18] recommended that basic uid maintenance should not exceed 6 cc/kg/h and that normovolemic hemodilution is pre­ferred, reporting that blood with a reduced hema­tocrit has a better ow prole than blood with a normal hematocrit.
Use ofVasopressors
The concept of vasopressors increasing the risk of free ap compromise has been one that has been discussed extensively for decades. Several studies have shown that intraoperative use of vasopressors does not increase the risk of free ap compromise and failure in head and neck cancer patients. In a retrospective study per­formed with 47 patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head, neck, and extremity reconstruc­tion, Kelly etal. [19] reported that free ap sur­vival was 97%, with 53.2% of cases showing the use of intraoperative vasopressors. There was no signicant difference in the frequency of total or partial ap necrosis between patients who received intraoperative vasopressors and those who did not. Similarly, there was no statistical signicance in the rate of arterial or venous thrombosis between the two groups (p = 0.095 and p = 0.095, respectively). In another study, Gardner etal. [20] reported that the use of vaso­pressors for extensive periods intraoperatively during free ap surgeries had no association with the rate of reoperation within 5days of interven­tion, regardless of the type of vasopressor used, simultaneous use of multiple agents, and/or type of free ap surgery. This study included 449 free ap reconstructions with a total of 174 patients receiving continuous vasopressors during their reconstruction.
6 Free Flap Considerations andComplications
99
Postoperative Phase
By and large, the immediate postoperative period represents the most common time for complica­tions to occur in free ap reconstruction. Close monitoring of patients in this time frame is cru­cial, as problems that are recognized and diagnosed early have much higher rates of suc­cessful salvage.
Vascular Thrombosis
Vascular thrombosis is a devastating complica­tion in free ap surgery, with thrombosis rates in the literature ranging from 3.2% to 9.9% across various studies, with an average occurrence in
6.4% of free aps [21], and this represents a major contributor to free ap failure [22, 23]. Thrombosis can occur either at the level of the pedicle or distally up to and including the micro­circulation of the ap, and they can occur within the venous system, the arterial vessels, or a com­bination of the two. Salvage rates in these instances vary anywhere from 28% to 90%, depending on the etiology of the complication and the timing of salvage procedure [24]. Salvage in cases of venous thrombosis is signicantly higher than in arterial thrombosis, partially attrib­uted to the fact that compromised aps due to venous congestion are more likely to occur within the rst 72 h and are often easier to detect, as compared to arterial insufciency, which is a more common cause of ap failure after the rst 72 h [25, 26]. The rates of salvage when both venous and arterial systems demonstrate throm­boses are, as expected, much lower [27]. Selber et al. [28] demonstrated that mean ap salvage rates in patients with microvascular ap compro­mise were 73% when returning once to the oper­ating room, 34% when returning twice, and 27% when returning three times, declining with greater number of insults to the ap. The greatest chance of success will be in patients with a tech­nical failure that is identied early, with an imme­diate return to the operating room. The time effect on salvage rates is likely associated with several factors, including irreversible ischemic injury to the ap and reperfusion injury with the “no-reow” phenomenon after vascular patency
has been re-established, and these are closely linked to secondary ischemia of the ap [29]. Primary ischemia is dened as the time between division of the vascular pedicle and re­establishment of blood ow after anastomosis. While generally accepted that the upper limit of this is approximately 4h, it is ideal that this time is kept under 60min. This also varies on the type of ap, as aps involving muscle are more meta­bolically demanding and often do not tolerate more than 3h of ischemia time, while the rate of fat necrosis in aps such as deep inferior epigas­tric artery (DIEP) aps increases after primary ischemia time exceeds 2h [30]. The concept of secondary ischemia is one which is characterized by the time between the occurrence of vascular thrombosis and return of blood ow to the ap, most often after nonsurgical or surgical interven­tion. It has been described that secondary isch­emia can be much more devastating for ap survival than the primary ischemic period, sec­ondary to increases in interstitial edema, platelet and brinogen concentrations, and increased rates of thrombosis [31, 32]. Furthermore, it has also been shown that the time between primary and secondary ischemia also inuences rates of ap survival. If the period between ischemic epi­sodes is less than 24h, secondary ischemia results in signicantly more ap necrosis than if that inter-ischemic period was stretched to 72 h or more, likely linked to increased time to washout of damaging free radicals from primary ischemia [33]. Reperfusion injury is an inammatory pro­cess which occurs when restored blood ow after a period of ischemia allows the inux of accumu­lated inammatory and damaging substrates such as free radicals that can injure the ap and severely compromise its survival. The transition point between normal reperfusion and reperfu­sion injury is poorly dened and differs among various tissue types, with some tissues being more resistant to ischemia than others, as previ­ously mentioned. For all tissues, however, the longer the periods of ischemia, the more likely they are to result in irreparable damage to the microcirculation and to the ap tissues. Stotland and Kerrigan [34] described damage caused by reperfusion injury as cell death by “bombard-
100
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
N. Patel et al.
ment.” Neutrophils become activated, inamma­tory mediators accumulate, and oxygen-based free radicals and proteolytic enzymes are released, inducing tissue damage. The “no­reow” phenomenon is often the result of reper­fusion injury and was rst described in 1967 as the “lack of nutritive capillary perfusion despite reperfusion of ischemic tissue” [35]. There have been several theories put forth on the physiologic nature of this phenomenon, involving things such as intravascular hemoconcentration, which changes the rheostatic properties of the blood, swelling of endothelial cells, increases in intersti­tial pressure and edema, and capillary obstruction by leukocytes [36].
The time to re-exploration has varied in the literature, ranging from peaking in the rst 24h [37, 38] up to 80% occurring within the rst 5 days postoperatively [39]. Despite this, the incidence of late thrombosis after postoperative day 5 has been well documented and accounts for between 10% and 28% of all thromboses [40,
41]. Free aps are thought to undergo revascular-
ization by way of the surrounding tissues and have an increased ability to survive without pedi­cle ow within several days after surgery, and it has been shown to result in complete ap inde­pendence as early as 6–8days postoperatively in experimental animal studies [4245]. As such, some postulate that late thrombosis has a decreased incidence of ap loss even with con­servative management [4648]. However, most authors believe that revascularization can take signicantly longer and can remain dependent of pedicle ow for several months to years [4951]. The surgeon must differentiate between a true late thrombosis and delayed recognition of early thrombosis, as the latter has much lower salvage rates and likely accounts for the majority of “late” thrombosis diagnoses. Both early and late thromboses have been shown to be predomi­nantly of the venous system. The type of ap has also been studied in regard to rates of collateral revascularization, with reports of osseous aps having longer dependence on pedicle ow as compared to soft tissue aps [52]. A major cause of late thrombosis is infection [53], with increases in the rate of thrombosis by 50–75% even up to
1 month postoperatively in this cohort [54]. A study by Sweeny et al. described a shift in the timing of free ap failures, demonstrating in their cohort that only 40% of failures occurred within the rst 72 h, with the majority of late failures being arterial insufciency in nature. They postu­late that while early venous failures are due to its low-pressure characteristics being more suscep­tible to external compression and pedicle geom­etry, and early arterial failures are due to technical issues (often found with intraoperative arterial thrombosis as well), the later failures involving arterial thromboses are more often due to the poor quality of vessels, due to either presence of calcications (Fig.6.1), plaques, or other vessel wall compromise, which may also contribute to the lower rates of salvage of these aps [55].
Venous thrombosis is by and large the most common vascular complication that is encoun­tered in the postoperative period in free ap sur­gery, accounting for as much as 70% of indications for re-exploration, and often occurs within the rst 48h [56]. This is likely due to the fact that venous structures are more easily com­pressible by surrounding edema, hematoma for­mation, and/or tight skin closure; have higher rates of spasm; and can result in vascular stasis more easily with pedicle kinking and even tran­sient periods of hypotension [57, 58]. Arterial thrombosis, however, is most often associated with technical factors at the level of the anasto­mosis, such as inadvertent damage to the intima during vessel manipulation, exposing the suben­dothelial connective tissues to circulating plate­lets and triggering the hemostatic cascade [59]. Other issues may include poor vessel apposition/ mismatch, back-walling of the suture, vascular twisting, vasospasm, calcications, as well as undue tension or compression at the anastomotic site, which can all contribute to clot formation [60]. This can result in multiple attempts at reanastomosis, resulting in prolonged ischemia times, reperfusion injury, and “no-reow” phe­nomenon [61].
The earliest sign of venous congestion of a ap is the appearance of hyperemia, a slight dark­ening of ap color in some areas with appearance of pinpoint ecchymoses, with a “goosebump”
6 Free Flap Considerations andComplications
Fig. 6.1 Calcied vessels in patients receiving free ap reconstruction
Fig. 6.2 Slight darkening of ap color with pinpoint ecchymoses (blue arrow) in early venous congestion
101
appearance (Fig. 6.2). Eventually, this leads to increased ap turgor with the ap appearing tense, more generalized changes in color from red to blue to purple (Fig. 6.3), brisk capillary rell of <2s, and increased warmth of the ap. A scratch or pinprick test can be performed to fur­ther assess the ap, which would reveal a rapid return of dark-appearing blood (Fig.6.4), indicat­ing a lack of outow of venous circulation. Arterial insufciency of free aps appears quite differently clinically than venous congestion,
with a decrease or arrest in inow of blood sup­ply. This leads to ap that appears pale in color, is soft with decreased turgor, would feel cool to the touch, and have a prolonged capillary rell of >2–3s. A scratch or pinprick test would reveal a very slow (or even absent) return of blood, indi­cating a lack of inux of sufcient blood supply (Fig.6.5).
In the setting of venous compromise, one can consider bedside neck exploration under mild sedation if no clinical signs of ap congestion are
102
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 6.3 Progression of venous congestion to more generalized blue/ purple color change, and increased ap turgor
N. Patel et al.
Fig. 6.4 Pinprick test reveals rapid return of dark-red blood (blue arrows) in venous congested ap
seen in the skin paddle, and all that is seen is a loss of the implantable Doppler signal, if one was used, as oftentimes this may simply be a coupler malfunction. If clinical signs of venous conges­tion are present in the ap, immediate take-back to the OR for exploration is warranted. Even in the case where return to the OR is planned, one can consider opening sutures bedside to see if taking some of the pressure off the venous circu­lation by surrounding edema, accumulation of
interstitial uid, or tight closure can potentially help relieve the external compression. The sur­geon can also open the neck entirely bedside to visually examine the pedicle to see if there is a kink or twist that can be rectied bedside. If an obvious clot is present within the venous system, one can also consider opening the venous anasto­mosis to allow the ap to drain, thereby decreas­ing the potential for ap damage until the patient can be brought back to the OR for formal explo-
ab
6 Free Flap Considerations andComplications
Fig. 6.5 Pale-appearing skin paddle, with decreased turgor, with minimal return of blood on scratch test (blue arrow), indicative of arterial insufciency
Fig. 6.6 (a) Takedown of ap to carefully examine and inspect to determine the cause of venous congestion. (b) Identication of venous thrombosis (blue arrow)
103
ration. The surgeon can gently pack the neck with gauze, while the ap continues to drain until return to the OR occurs. In the case of arterial compromise, immediate return to the OR for exploration is warranted.
When returning to the OR for exploration and possible revision, careful inspection of the entire ap and vascular pedicle is warranted, often necessitating ap takedown to accomplish this (Fig.6.6a), and the cause of the vascular compli­cation should be identied. Ensure that there are no kinks or twists in the pedicle and that the pedicle is not being externally compressed by surrounding tissues or hematoma. Once external causes are excluded, internal causes such as vasospasm, issues with the anastomosis, or
thrombosis may be the culprit. If venous throm­bosis is noted (Fig.6.6b), opening of the anasto­mosis is warranted with mechanical thrombectomy either by way of milking out the clot manually (Fig.6.7) or via Fogarty catheter (Fig.6.8), irrigation with heparinized saline, cut­back of thrombosed segment (with or without vein grafting as needed), and revision either with the same vein or another carefully selected recipient vein. In a comparison of 21 compro­mised aps with thrombosis of either the venous or the arterial systems, the use of a Fogarty cath­eter for mechanical thrombectomy resulted in a 57% rate of successful ap salvage [62]. Risks of this technique however include further propa­gation of the thrombus, microtrauma to the ves-
104
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 6.7 Manual removal of venous thrombosis
Fig. 6.8 Thrombectomy with Fogarty catheter
N. Patel et al.
sel with possible intimal damage and dissection, vessel perforation, or device complications such as rupture or avulsion within the vessel [63]. Thrombolytics such as recombinant tissue plas­minogen activator (Rt- PA) in conjunction with mechanical thrombectomy as a multimodal approach has also been used and has shown some promising improvements in ap salvage rates [64]. The debate on the use of one versus two venous anastomoses has been an ongoing one; on the one hand, two veins provide increased drainage and theoretically less risk of venous congestion, whereas single venous anastomosis reduces operating time and allows for easier ap inset [65]. Xu etal. [66] have reported that the use of one-vein anastomosis had signicantly higher salvage rates and earlier time to detection of ap compromise than two-vein anastomoses in a cohort of 389 free aps. Despite this, some studies have demonstrated no difference between the two [67], and some have shown that two veins are better than one in reducing the inci­dence of take- backs and failure rates [68, 69]. Good arterial pulsations should be present and
might be weak or absent in the case of arterial thrombosis. In this case, takedown of the arterial anastomosis is warranted with removal of throm­bus and cutback to healthy vessel prior to reanas­tomosis, or selection of another donor artery. If a length discrepancy or vessel caliber mismatch is present, consideration should be made to per­form vein grafting and/or selection of a new donor artery. Systemic antithrombotic agents such as intravenous heparin in doses of 3000 or 5000 units at the time of venous or arterial reanastomosis may be employed in conjunction, particularly if thrombus formation rapidly reoc­curs at the time of exploration and revision. If a venous coupler was used, surgeons can use the same size coupler or a larger one if proper anas­tomosis can be accomplished. To deal with vas­cular spasms, the pedicle can be irrigated with papaverine (alkaloid antispasmodic) to decrease the incidence of vascular spasm, the ap can be warmed, and the use of lidocaine and nicardipine has also been described [70].
Patients demonstrating a history of hyperco-
agulability (antiphospholipid syndrome, factor
6 Free Flap Considerations andComplications
105
V Leiden, factor C and S deciency, etc.) have demonstrated increased rates of both arterial and venous thrombosis in free ap surgery [71,
72]. Moreover, patients with malignancies,
which is a major indication for free ap recon­struction in the head and neck, have been shown to be hypercoagulable at baseline and thus are inherently at increased risk of thrombosis [73]. Additionally, patients who are treated intraop­eratively and/or postoperatively with heparin are susceptible to thrombosis due to a rare side effect, heparin- induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITT), which can occur in about
0.1–1% of heparinized patients, with higher rates in patients receiving unfractionated hepa­rin (UFH) as compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [7476]. These patients should be switched to a non-heparin anticoagu­lant such as argatroban and likely will require long-term coumadin therapy. Patients who have repeated clotting, either intraoperatively or postoperatively, should have a hypercoagulabil­ity workup to determine if a thrombophilic dis­order is present. Once successful ap salvage has been achieved, postoperative care becomes a vital component of maintenance of a healthy ap. Close observation of the ap within an intensive care unit (ICU) with trained personnel becomes vital, with careful attention to neck position to prevent kinking, twisting, or stretch­ing of the vessels, as well as close monitoring of vitals, laboratory values, and overall patient sta­tus. Education of ICU staff on ap monitoring is crucial to ensure adequate care and early recog­nition of problematic issues. There currently exists a paucity of data and evidence- based research regarding the use of therapeutic antico­agulation after successful free ap salvage. Senchenkov etal. looked at a large series of 395 free aps for breast reconstruction and advo­cated for routine postoperative anticoagulation with heparin in all patients who experienced both intraoperative and postoperative throm­botic events, with the addition of antiplatelet therapy for those with repeated thromboses. However, targeted protocols in this scenario in head and neck reconstructive surgery have not yet been established [77].
While surgical exploration and revision of compromised aps remain the mainstay of man­agement for these patients, there exist situations in which other options must be explored. In cases where the patient may be too unstable to return to the OR, or where thromboses are too numerous or too distal to warrant access and revision, or in case of repeated clotting, nonsurgical options are to be considered. These can include the use of thrombolytics, anticoagulants, hyperbaric oxy­gen therapy (HBOT), or medicinal leeches (Hirudo medicinalis).
The use of Rt-PA has been described in the literature for salvage of venous congested free aps. Rt-PA is a thrombolytic that encourages the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin and initi­ates local brinolysis, thus aiding in the resolu­tion of venous and arterial clotting. Not all patients are candidates for thrombolytic therapy, however, as patients with a history of bleeding diatheses and patients who are at high risk of intracranial, gastrointestinal, and other bleeds may represent absolute contraindications to this therapy. Tran etal. [78] have previously described successful use of subcutaneous injection of Rt-PA directly into aps, with return of capillary rell and resolution of venous congestion. Often, this is not employed as a rst option; however, after multiple attempts at venous revision, this becomes a consideration. Ayhan et al. [79] employed the use of Rt-PA after three attempts at venous anastomosis with recurrent venous con­gestion, where injection of 2 mg of Rt-PA into multiple areas of their aps allowed for success­ful salvage. Ihler et al. [80] reported return of capillary rell between 4 and 8h after injection, though this can vary depending on ap size and varying severity of ap thrombosis. Additionally, the use of thrombolytic therapy intra-arterially for ap salvage in the case of venous congestion was rst described in 1987 by Lipton and Jupiter and is well described and utilized today [8184]. This may help not only with thrombosis at the level of the pedicle, but also with clotting within the microcirculation of the ap itself, as this can be a signicant cause of ap failure.
The use of heparin to relieve venous congestion was rst described in 1989 in cases of digital