Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_30_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
25 Мб
Скачать
7 Extended Procedures
https://t.me/medicina_free
231
Limitations
Exposure anterior to the pituitary and poste­rior to the carotid artery is not possible with this approach.
Complication
The risk of devascularization of the alveolar ridge leading to palatal necrosis is a potential complication.
3. Transpalatal Approach This is another midline approach with the fol­lowing variants:
Palatal Retraction—Retracting the soft
palate anteriorly provides exposure for adenoidectomy, biopsy and excision of small tumours from the nasopharynx.
Palatal Split—Vertical division of the soft
palate allows exposure from the lower third of clivus to C2. Can be used for basi­lar artery aneurysm.
Palatal Drop—Owen’s inverted U inci-
sion is placed on the palate about 1 cm medial to the alveolar ridge, separating the hard and soft palate for choanal atresia and angiobroma.
Sardana’s Approach—S-shaped incision
with three segments, a peroral palatal drop approach (Owen’s incision), an ipsilateral sublabial incision and a connecting U-shaped incision curving behind the max­illary tuberosity and connecting the previ­ous two incisions. Especially indicated for tumours extending from the nasopharynx to the infratemporal fossa via the pterygo­maxillary ssure.
Limitation
The transpalatal approach and its modication allow excision of midline tumours from the nasopharynx to C2. Exposure anterior to cho­ana and sphenoid sinus, lateral to Eustachian tube and posterior to foramen magnum and brainstem are not accessible.
Complication
Palatal stula is a potential complication.
4. Denker’s Approach Trans-naso-maxillary approach—Involves a large Caldwell–Luc antrostomy through sub­labial route followed by removal of lateral nasal wall and frontal process of maxilla.
Essentially a medial maxillectomy is under­taken via the sublabial route.
5. Preauricular Subtemporal Approach ((Fig.
6.17, Chap. 6), Figs. 7.13 and 7.26)
Unlike maxillary swing which provides a direct anterior approach to the infratemporal fossa, preauricular subtemporal offers a lat­eral approach to the same. It is indicated in case of tumour involvement lateral and poste­rior to cavernous part of ICA. One can approach the entire skull base from the naso­pharynx to the petrous apex and clivus with minimal brain retraction.
6. Facial Translocation Approach This approach is based on the concept of “Modular-Disassembly” of facial subunits by Janecka etal. [45]. This means that the face is divided into subunits each with its own neuro­vascular supply. It is divided into:
(a) Limited facial translocation (b) Standard facial translocation (c) Extended facial translocation
An example of standard facial translocation is provided here. To approach the nasopharynx as well as infratemporal fossa and middle cra­nial fossa, the entire maxilla, lateral orbital wall and zygoma can be swung laterally as one single unit.
7. Maxillectomy Maxillectomy can be classied as either total if all six walls are removed or partial if it involves preservation of any of the six walls. Examples of partial maxillectomy include: medial maxillectomy, subtotal maxillectomy (preserving orbital oor) and palate preserv­ing maxillectomy. Sometimes orbital exen­teration is performed along with total maxillectomy. In this case, the appropriate term would be a radical maxillectomy.
(a) Total maxillectomy (Fig.7.27)
Indicated in malignancy arising from the maxillary sinus, invasive fungal disease causing destruction of the maxillary sinus. The soft tissue approach preceding a maxillectomy can either be a Weber– Ferguson incision or a sublabial incision. It involves excision of the maxillary sinus, one half of the hard palate, oor of
232
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Mittal et al.
the orbit, palatine bone, lateral wall of nose and the inferior turbinate. The fol­lowing osteotomies are performed to mobilize the maxilla:
(i) Superomedially—Nasal process of
maxilla.
(ii) Superolaterally—Between maxilla
and zygomatic arch.
(iii) Inferiorly—Between lateral incisor
and canine till midline of palate.
Fig. 7.26 Left side marked Preauricular Subtemporal Approach
(iv) Inferolaterally—The maxilla is sep-
arated from the pterygoid plates.
• May be accompanied by eth­moidectomy or sphenoidotomy
(b) Partial Maxillectomy: Medial maxillec-
tomy: with or without ethmoidectomy. Involves resection of medial wall of max­illary sinus from the oor of orbit to oor of nasal cavity. The most common nasal pathology where this is indicated is inverted papilloma. Osteotomies:
(i) Supromedially—From pyriform
aperture towards inferior orbital s­sure, inferiorly and parallel to fronto-ethmoidal suture line
(ii) Laterally—Vertically along anterior
wall of maxilla towards inferior
orbital ssure along oor of orbit (iii) Inferiorly—Above the alveolar arch (iv) Infero-medially—Parallel to oor of
nasal cavity oor inferior to inferior
turbinate
8. Craniofacial Resection (Fig. 7.28)
Involves resection of intracranial as well as extra-cranial parts of a sinonasal tumour extending to the anterior skull base. Paranasal sinuses are approached either by a lateral rhi-
Fig. 7.27 Maxillectomy specimen. Cuts are made the same as maxillary swing but anterior soft tissue ap is separated from underlying bone as showed in Fig. 6.16 of Chap. 6.
ab
7 Extended Procedures
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 7.28 Craniofacial resection
233
notomy or a midfacial degloving. Tumour may also be approached by a nasal endoscopic approach. For the purpose of anterior skull base exposure, a bifrontal craniotomy is per­formed using a bicoronal incision. Cheesman and Reddy [46] have classied craniofacial resection into three types:
• Type I: It is an extended medial maxillec­tomy with limited resection of the anterior part of the skull base without resorting to a craniotomy.
• Type II: Here the intracranial component is approached through a window craniotomy.
• Type III: This is the traditional craniofacial resection where bicoronal incision is made followed by bifrontal craniotomy.
9. Transbasal Approach The difculties and potential complications related to a craniofacial resection are miti­gated to a certain extent by the transbasal approach. The soft tissue approach can be either a bicoronal incision or a brow incision or a spectacle incision. Instead of performing a bifrontal craniotomy, the frontonasal unit is elevated as a free bone ap. The advantages in doing so are limited brain retraction while approaching lesions, extending posteriorly towards the clivus. If approached through tra­ditional craniofacial resection, the resulting
brain retraction produces signicant periop­erative morbidity.
7.5 Part E: Open Anterior Skull Base Approaches: Indications andComplications
The anterior cranial base has an endocranial surface, which faces the brain, and an exocranial surface, which faces the nasal cavity and sinuses, orbits, pharynx, infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossae, and the parapharyngeal and infrapetrosal spaces. Canals, foramina and ssures through which numer­ous neural and vascular structures passes connect both the surfaces. On the endocranial side, the bor­der between the anterior and middle cranial bases is the sphenoid ridge joined medially by the chiasmatic sulcus. On the exocranium side, the anterior and middle cranial bases are divided at the level of a transverse line extending through the pterygomaxil­lary ssures and the pterygopalatine fossae at the upper level and the posterior edge of the alveolar process of the maxilla at a lower level. Medially, this corresponds to the anterior part of the attachment of the vomer to the sphenoid bone.
The pathological conditions affecting the
anterior cranial base are highly heterogeneous
234
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Mittal et al.
groups. They can be classied according to the site of tumour origin as described below:
1. Basal neurovascular structures and
meninges
• Meningiomas: Olfactory groove, Planum Sphenoidale, Tuberculum sella
• Schwannomas
• Pituitary adenoma
• Craniopharyngiomas
• Paraganglioma
• Hemangiopericytoma
2. Cranial base
• Chordoma
• Chondrosarcoma
• Osteosarcoma
• Plasmacytoma
• Metastasis
3. Subcranial with upward extension
• Sinonasal carcinomas
• Olfactory neuroblastoma
• Juvenile angiobroma
• Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma
• Primary sarcomas
Anosmia, frontal lobe dysfunction, increased intracranial pressure, nasal obstruction, CSF rhi­norrhoea, epistaxis, visual changes and endocrine dysfunction are the list of symptoms with intra­cranial connection of mass lesion of the nose and paranasal sinuses.
7.5.1 Diagnostic Work-Up
The clinical examination is focused on complete evaluation with special attention to the head and neck region. Supplemental information regarding the extent of the tumour can be obtained by oph­thalmoscopy, indirect laryngoscopy or exible breoptic nasopharyngoscopy. The imaging bat­tery includes contrast-enhancing computerized tomography (CECT) scan, magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) with contrast scan. The diagnostic cerebral angiography (DSA) is indicated in selected cases to obtain information regarding vas­cularity of the lesion and possible involvement of surrounding major neurovascular bundle. Elective preoperative angiographic embolization is advised in highly vascular cases to reduce intraoperative blood loss. Quantitative assessment of visual acu­ity and visual eld charting is required to docu­ment the preoperative status of vision. Endocrine work-up is for tumours extending to the sellar/ suprasellar region. The approaches for anterior skull base are tabulated in Fig.7.29 [47, 48].
Transcranial approaches indicated for lesions restricted to the intracranial compartment. They are divided into anterior and anterolateral approaches depending upon the tumour exten­sions [4951]:
1. Anterior:
• Bifrontal craniotomy
• Unifrontal craniotomy
• Transbasal craniotomy Anterior craniotomy approaches are indi-
cated for midline lesions like meningiomas of olfactory groove, planum sphenoidale, tubercu­lum sella, esthesioneuroblastomas without lat­eral extensions. Large midline lesions are approached using bifrontal craniotomy whereas small lesions can be approached using either unifrontal/bifrontal craniotomy. The incision is bicoronal or unilateral frontal curvilinear inci­sion. Following the incision, a bifrontal (large lesions) or unifrontal (small lesions) craniotomy is performed. Dura is opened based on superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and the sinus ligated and cut. Sinus ligation is done in large lesions involving the cribriform plate. Smaller lesions may not require sinus ligation (Fig.
2. Anterolateral—Five types of anterolateral approaches are described:
(a) Fronto-orbital (b) Fronto-temporal craniotomy (c) Pterional craniotomy (Frontosphe notemporal)
7.30).
Approaches
7 Extended Procedures
https://t.me/medicina_free
Transfacial
Subcranial
235
• Lateral rhinotomy
• Weber-Ferguson
• Lynch incision
• Dieffenbach incision
• Subciliary/Midcilary
• Midfacial degloving (MFD)
Craniofacial
Transcranial to Anterior Skull Base
Lesions
Combined
Approaches
Fig. 7.29 Approaches to anterior skull base
Bifrontal craniotomy with subfrontal approach
• Unilateral frontal craniotomy with subfrontal approach
• Pterionalapproach
• Fronto-orbital approach
• Frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic (FTOZ) approach
Subcranialor craniofacial with ipsilateral /bilateral partial maxillectomy (Extension to Medial or superior maxillary walls
and periorbita)
Subcranial–MFD (Benign tumours extending to the maxillary sinus compartment ±Pterygopalatine fossa or nasopharynx)
Craniofacial with Weber-Fergusson incision (Malignant tumours extending to the inferior/ anterior/lateral/posterior maxillary walls)
Subcranialor craniofacial with pterional (Extension to the lateral skull base, cavernous sinus, middle fossa or Infratemporal fossa)
Subcranial-LeFortI (Extension to the lower clival region)
Subcranialor transcranial with transorbital (Orbital apex or intraorbitalextension)
Transcranial-transfacial-transorbital (for Malignant tumours extending to the maxillary sinus with intra-orbital extension)
(d) Fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic
(FTOZ): An extension of pterional craniotomy
(e) Supraorbital keyhole craniotomy
Fronto-orbital is useful for lesions with orbital extensions. Fronto-temporal craniotomy is used for lesions with lateral and middle cra­nial fossa extensions. Pterional craniotomy is the workhorse of neurosurgery as most of the lesions can be approached with this craniotomy.
It is for midline lesions of anterior as well as
middle fossa lesions like meningiomas, sellar/
suprasellar and para-sellar lesions. FTOZ is an extension of the pterional craniotomy with additional removal of orbit and zygomatic bones (Fig. 7.31). FTOZ is useful for lesions involving cavernous sinus and suprasellar lesions reaching up to the third ventricle.
Supraorbital keyhole is the mini frontolat­eral craniotomy (Fig.7.32). It starts with an eyebrow incision and it is cosmetically accept­able, includes frontal-orbital and part of the zygomatic process. The indications are ante­rior skull base lesions, sellar suprasellar lesions and aneurysms of anterior circulation.
236
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Mittal et al.
ab
c
Fig. 7.30 Stepwise demonstration of transbasal approach: (a) Bicoronal skin incision and elevation of subgaleal ap separately for skull base carpeting later, (b) Burr holes on either side of SSS, (c) Single-piece crani-
It is contraindicated in well-pneumatized frontal sinus and lesions involving cribriform plate (relative contraindication).
7.5.2 The Subcranial Approach
It is a single-stage procedure used for tumours involving the anterior skull base [52, 53]. It involves coronal incision and osteotomy of the naso-fronto-orbital bone segment. It allows access to the intra- and extra-cranial compart­ments of the anterior skull base. The advantages
d
otomy with intact bilateral superior orbital walls and nasion, (d) Exposed bifrontal dura, spatula in midline over SSS, bilateral orbit (Star), bilateral frontal sinus and ethmoids (Donut) along with nasion
are direct exposure of the anterior skull base from anterior to posterior, allows simultaneous intra­dural and extradural tumour removal from ante­rior to posterior, does not require facial incisions and minimal frontal lobe manipulation. The dis­advantage of this approach is osteonecrosis, especially following radiotherapy (RT).
7.5.3 Reconstruction
The aim is to create watertight dural closure and secure barrier between the nasal cavity and the
7 Extended Procedures
https://t.me/medicina_free
237
Fig. 7.31 Stepwise demonstration of FTOZ craniotomy. (a) Positioning with malar eminence as the highest point, (b) Curvilinear hairline incision, (c) Fronto-temporo zygomatic bony exposure with cuff of muscle left attached
along the superior temporal line, (d) Single-piece crani­otomy with the temporalis muscle cuff, (e) Exposed orbit (Star) and the fronto-temporal dura, (f) Bone xed with miniplates and screws
Fig. 7.32 (a) Eyebrow incision shown as red, (b) eleva- tion of periosteal ap (star) separately, suction pointing on the supraorbital frontal bone, (c) fashioning the craniot­omy (2.5 × 2.5 cms) using the footplate drill, (d) exposed
dura, (E) after dural opening using suction and scissors and suction as dynamic retractors resting on the basifron­tal lobe covered with cotton (star) and basal dura of ante­rior cranial base (yellow asterisk)
238
https://t.me/medicina_free
P. Mittal et al.
cranial cavity. It can be done by curetting of mucosa of frontal, ethmoidal and sphenoidal sinus and packed with fat. The dura defects should be closed primarily with sutures or with a fascial graft. Basal repair performed by placing a pedicled galea aponeurotica-pericranial-frontalis muscle ap based on the supraorbital–supra­trochlear vessels along the anterior cranial fossa base (Fig. 7.28a). Further posterior reinforce­ment of fascia lata graft with temporalis muscle rotation is required to obliterate the dead space. Bony segments secured in their respective ana­tomical positions using sutures or miniplates + autologous temporal or frontal bone to reinforce the skull base bony reconstruction. Additionally, musculocutaneous and free aps based on the pectoralis major and trapezius as well as free omental aps for basal repair.
7.5.4 Complications
Transcranial surgery has a long list of complications such as cerebral edema, frontal lobe signs (mainly due to retraction)—decits of speech, memory, cognitive and intellectual function, seizures, CSF leak, subdural or extradural haematoma, pneumo­cephalus, CNS Infections like meningitis and brain abscess, vascular complications like carotid, ante­rior/middle cerebral artery injuries, hormonal dys­function and cranial nerve decits [54].
7.6 Part F: Lacrimal Sac Anatomy andDCR
The lacrimal gland has a tubule-acinar structure and secretes serous tears in superior fornix. The secretomotor bres are from the VII nerve through the pterygopalatine ganglion. The lac­rimal system starts from the lacrimal puncta and consists of vertical and horizontal canalic­uli (upper and lower), a common canaliculus, lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. Lacrimal sac is 12–15mm long, situated in lacrimal fossa formed by frontal process of maxilla and lacri­mal bone, anterior to posterior. The superior border of the lacrimal sac is above the middle
turbinate’s anterior attachment and is lateral to the agger nasi cells. The anterior attachment of the uncinate process is regarded as the posterior limit of bone removal. The lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct slopes down backward and inward. Chronic dacryocystitis is more com­mon in females than males because of the nar­row nasolacrimal duct in women. On blinking the orbicularis muscle alternate contraction and relaxation creates negative pressure in the lacri­mal sac; this tear pump helps in sucking tears into the sac. Capillary action carries most of the tears (70%) into the lower punctum and cana­liculus, while the rest is carried through the upper punctum and canaliculus.
As demonstrated on Scintillography, the trans­fer of uid from the canaliculi to the sac is an active process, while the ow of tears into the nasolacrimal duct is the passive process.
7.6.1 Pathology—Dacryocystitis
The most common cause is blockage of the naso­lacrimal duct, leading to inammation of the sac. It occurs due to:
• Structural limitation—congenital incomplete
canalization (Hasner’s valve), narrow osseous
nasolacrimal duct, grossly deviated nasal
septum, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, polyp
or tumour.
• Infection from surrounding structures—nasal
infection, ethmoidal inammation, conjunc-
tival infection, long-standing nasal packs.
• General infection—Inuenza, chickenpox.
7.6.2 Preoperative Tests/
Investigations
1. ROPLAS—“Regurgitation on pressure over
the lacrimal sac” area—the positive test indi­cates the blockage of the nasolacrimal duct (Fig.7.33).
2. Jones dye test—Fluorescein dye is instilled in
the eye. The presence of dye in the nasal cavity in 5 minutes is considered as normal
7 Extended Procedures
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 7.33 Positive ROPLAS test on right side
functioining lacrimal pump system in the nasal cavity is considered as normal function­ing lacrimal pump system [55].
(a) Positive primary Jones test—no
obstruction.
(b) If dye is not detected in the nose, syring-
ing is done and then uorescein detected, is labelled positive secondary Jones test, which signies functional obstruction in the nasolacrimal duct.
(c) If no uorescein is detected in the nose
even after syringing, it is labelled nega­tive secondary Jones test, which signies stenosis of puncta or canalicular system.
3. Probing—4% lignocaine drops are instilled in the eye. The punctum is dilated with Nettleship’s punctual dilator and Bowman’s probe. Soft block indicates a canalicular or common canalicular block whereas hard stop indicates that the probe is in the lacrimal sac and is touching the bone.
4. Syringing—the punctum is cannulated with a soft cannula and saline is injected. No regurgita­tion is considered as normal functioning drain­age system. Canalicular block is considered when the uid is regurgitated from the same punctum. Regurgitation through the opposite punctum is either due to common canalicular blockage or NLD blockage. In NLD blockage uid is mixed with mucoid or purulent secretion. In common canalicular blockage, uid is clear.
5. Radiology—T2-weighted images of MRI is helpful in detecting obstruction site exactly within nasolacrimal duct and thus planning for correct endoscopic procedure [56]. The sensi-
239
tivity of CT and MRI can be improved by injection of contrast (Dacrocystrography). In dacroscintigraphy, technetium 99 is placed on the ocular surface. The canaliculi and sac are visible within 10–15s. The dye appears in the nasal cavity after 10–30 min intervals. Dacroscintigraphy is not useful because of poor resolution and poor anatomical detailing.
The indications for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct not responding to conservative treatment (like hot compresses, massage, probing and intubation) in children [
57], dacryocystitis with NLD
obstruction, mucocele with NLD obstruction, congenital stula and posttraumatic NLD obstruction with epiphora. DCR can be done by endoscopic or open approach. ENT surgeons are more familiar with endoscopic DCR.The advan­tages of Endoscopic DCR are scarless surgery, preservation of orbicularis oculi pump mecha­nism. It also allows simultaneous correction of intranasal pathology and results of endoscopic DCR are comparable with external DCR [58]. The prerequisite for success endo DCR is correct identication of lacrimal sac and prevention of restenosis. Pre-existing anatomical variations such as concha bullosa, septal deviation, agger nasi cells and lateralization of uncinate process can increase the risk of failure as they require more excision of mucosa for exposure. Bony window can be mal- positioned or incomplete due to anatomical variations [
59].
7.6.2.1 Surgical Technique
forEndoscopic DCR
The key landmark is the ridge formed by the frontal process of maxilla at the anterior attach­ment of the middle turbinate, anterior to uncinate process, on the lateral nasal wall [60]. The sac is located at and anterior to the axilla of middle tur­binate or maxillary line in around 95% of cases (Fig.7.34).
The ap elevation is started with two separate incisions 8 mm above and below the axilla of middle turbinate or it can be started with a verti­cal curved anterior incision given 1 to 1.5cm to the base of uncinate process vertically down till
240
abc
P. Mittal et al.
https://t.me/medicina_free
the anterior end of the middle turbinate than two horizontal incision (Fig.7.35).
The overlying mucosa is separated using a blunt dissector and this strip of mucosa is removed using a pair of through-cut forceps. The Kerrison’s bone punch is hooked against the posterior part of the anterior lacrimal crest (Fig. 7.36) and bone removed working from posterior thin bone to ante­rior thick bone. A wide bony window is made of the size of approximately 12–15mm (Fig.7.36). Bone can also be removed by drilling, chisel and hammer or laser. The use of powered instruments has not shown an added advantage on surgical suc­cess with cold instruments [61, 62]. Periosteum and sac wall incised vertically using sickle knife or 12 number blade, pus drained, suction cleaning done (Fig.7.36). The whole of the medial wall of the sac can be removed or anterior-based ap can be created to minimize mucosal trauma. Nasal mucosal ap can be joined with posterior wall of
ML
MT
Fig. 7.34 Relationship of sac with maxillary line (ML) and anterior end of the middle turbinate (MT) (Courtesy— Dr. Hitesh Verma, Associate Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi, India)
de f
Fig. 7.35 The surgical steps of ap elevation. (a) local inltration, (b) site of upper incision, (c) site of lower incision, (d) two horizontal incision lines, (e) joining of
horizontal incision, (f) posterior-based ap. Maxillary line (ML) (Courtesy—Dr. Hitesh Verma, Associate Professor, AIIMS, New Delhi, India)
ML
Flap