Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1004_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
Small Intestine andAppendix
https://t.me/medicina_free
45
2
– Appendectomy: resect appendiceal
mesentery (for histological examination of lymph nodes)+prevent rupture (in case of manipulation/extraction)
– Right hemicolectomy only in case of
inltration of the residual limb
Ruptured Mucocele (= Pseudomyxoma Peritonei/Mucinous Carcinomatosis)
5 Rupture = displacement of epithelial
cells+mucus in the peritoneal space
5 Clinical Presentation:
– Appendicitis signs – Increased abdominal girth – Ovarian mass – Inguinal hernia
5 Treatment: CRS (cytoreductive sur-
gery)+HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperito­neal chemotherapy)
Forecast
Prognostic Factors
5 Extent of the peritoneal tumor conglom-
erate
5 Histological grade of the tumor
Carcinoid Tumors: Neuroendocrine Tumors oftheAppendix
5 Carcinoid tumors of the appendix=part
of the carcinoids of the midgut (common embryological origin)
5 Terminology: carcinoids of the appen-
dix = well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the appendix
5 Histology: NET = enterochromafn cells
(expression of S-100)
5 NET = malignant tumours with benign
behaviour pattern
Epidemiology
5 Appendix-NET=5% of all intestinal car-
cinoids
5 Mostly in patients around 40years of age 5 Appendiceal carcinoids <1cm+not local-
ized in appendiceal base=90%
– Appendectomy=sufcient treatment – Mostly retrospective postoperative
diagnosis
Diagnosis
5 Depending on the presence of a Clinical
Presentation
Course oftheDisease
5 In most patients: Dissemination of tumor
cells in the abdomen at the time of diagno­sis
5 Most of these neoplasms are noninvasive 5 Metastases = rare; locoregional recur-
rence=frequent (ileus)
Survival
5 Without treatment: Very poor prognosis
(no chance of cure+very limited survival)
5 With aggressive CRS + HIPEC: 5-year
survival = 50–96% in selected patient groups (if no distant metastases + com­plete cytoreduction)
5 CRS+HIPEC must be performed early in
the disease history
Non-functional NET
5 Slow growing 5 Mostly years until rst symptoms and
diagnosis
5 Mostly diagnosis in the context of surgery
(pathology)
Functional NET
5 Carcinoid syndrome: hormonal produc-
tion=symptoms+dosable products
5 Marker:
– 5-HIAA (degradation product of sero-
tonin) test in urine – Chromogranin A – Serotonin
46
CU
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Mutter
Environment Diagnosis
5 As with other NET: possibility of other
gastrointestinal genitourinary tumors
2
5 Colonoscopy: to exclude other colon
tumors
5 Other screening examination depending
on age and other risk factors
– Treatment controversial – Hemicolectomy on the right:
– When inltration of the mesoappen-
dix – If R1 at the resection margin – If N+ (lymph node metastases) – In case of high proliferation activity
(high Ki67 index), high mitotic
Treatment (According toRecommendations oftheAmerican National Cancer Institute andENETS)
5 . Figure2.1 5 NET <1cm, not in appendix base
– Appendectomy
5 NET >2cm
– Hemicolectomy right+ileocecal lymph-
adenectomy (risk of metastases)
5 1cm<NET<2cm
ENETS ENETS
Tumor size
T Classication
Inltration Mesoappendix or Serosa
<1 cm 1–2 cm 2–4 cm1–2 cm≤1 cm > 2 cm
T1 T2 T3T1aT1b
0–
Goblet Cell Carcinoid or Adenocarcinoid
Aftercare
<3 mm**
index, angioinvasion – If mixed histology (goblet cell
carcinoid)
5 Rare variant with mixed endocrine and exocrine
properties
5 Associated with poor prognosis
5 Monitoring in patients with elevated chromo-
granin A (indicator for extended resection)
ENETSUICC/AJCC UICC/AJC ICC/AJCC
T2(or >)
>3 mm**
Localization Tip/Middle
and R0*
End of therapy
. Fig. 2.1 Treatment algorithm of NETs of the vermi-
form appendix according to the recommendations of the American National Cancer Institute and the ENETS* R0=tumor-free resection margins** very lim-
Appendectomy Appendectomy
Base or
R1
No risk factor*** Discuss risk factor***
Tip/Middle
and R0*
Right Hemicolectomy (with
lymphadenectomy)
ited evidence*** risk factors are: V1 (histologic vascular invasion)—L1 (histologic lymphatic vascular inva­sion)—G2 grading—>3 mm inltration or inltration of the mesoappendix
Base or
R1
Small Intestine andAppendix
https://t.me/medicina_free
47
2
5 Survival:
– Excellent for locoregional tumors – Tumours with distant metastases:
10-year survival=30%
Noncarcinoid Tumors oftheAppendix
5 Appendix=possible location of all intesti-
nal tumors
5 Rare tumor entities
Classication According toWorld Health Organisation (WHO)
Table2.2)
(.
5 Epithelial tumors 5 Non-epithelial tumors
. Table 2.2 Histological WHO classication
of appendiceal tumours
Epithelial tumors Non-epithelial
tumors
Adenoma
Tubular Villös Tubulovillous Serrated
Carcinoma
Adenocarcinoma Mucinous adenocarci-
noma
Signet ring cell carcinoma Small cell carcinoma Non-differentiated
carcinoma
Carcinoid (well differenti­ated neuroendocrine neoplasia)
Tubular carcinoid Hyperplastic
Goblet cell carcinoid (mucinous carcinoid)
Mixed carcinoid adenocar­cinoma
Other
Neuroma Lipoma Leiomyoma Gastrointestinal
stromal tumor
Leiomyosarcoma Kaposi’s sarcoma Other
Malignant lymphoma
Secondary tumors
(metaplastic) polyp
Overview: Appendix Adenocarcinoma
5 Rare: 0.08% of all carcinomas 5 Mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma=most fre-
quent subtype (better prognosis after resection)
Clinical Presentation
5 Appendicitis in the elderly patient 5 Mucocele
Treatment
5 Hemicolectomy right = standard proce-
dure
5 Drug treatment/chemotherapy for specic
diseases (lymphomas etc.)
References
Spirt MJ (2010) Complicated intra-abdominal infec-
tions: a focus on appendicitis and diverticulitis. Postgrad Med 122:39–51
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and
efcacy of antibiotics compared with appendicec­tomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appen­dicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 5:344
Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M,
Costaglioli B, Karoui M, Alves A, Dousset B, Valleur P, Falissard B, Franco D (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendectomy for treat­ment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open­label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579
Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
OliverThomusch
Contents
3.1 Anatomy andPhysiology – 50
3.1.1 Denition andLimits – 50
3.1.2 Tasks – 50
3.1.3 Location andClassication – 50
3.1.4 Measured Values – 50
3.1.5 Characteristic Features oftheColon – 50
3.1.6 Blood Supply andDrainage – 51
3.2 Benign Diseases oftheColon – 51
3.2.1 Diverticulosis andDiverticulitis – 51
3.2.2 Colonic Polyps – 56
3.2.3 Ulcerative Colitis – 57
3.2.4 Chronic Constipation – 61
3.2.5 Guidelines – 64
49
3
3.3 Colon Cancer andHereditary CRC Syndromes – 64
3.3.1 Colon Carcinoma – 64
3.3.2 HNPCC (Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer): Lynch Syndrome – 71
3.3.3 Other Hereditary CRC Syndromes – 75
3.3.4 Guidelines – 75
Reference – 76
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature 2023 F. Billmann, T. Keck (eds.), Essentials of Visceral Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66735-4_3
50
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Thomusch
3.1 Anatomy andPhysiology
5 Position of the colon in relation to the
peritoenum
– Caecum (distal part)+appendix: Intra-
3.1.1 Denition andLimits
peritoneal
– Caecum (proximal part): Secondary ret-
3
5 Denition
– Colon = Intestinum crassum, part of
the gastrointestinal tract
– Distally from the small intestine, proxi-
mal from the rectum
5 Limits
– Proximal= ileocecal valve (= Bauhin);
roperitoneal
– Ascending colon: Secondary retroperi-
toneal – Transverse colon: Intraperitoneal – Descending colon: Secondary retroperi-
toneal – Sigmoid colon: Intraperitoneal
border between terminal ileum and colon
– Distal = indistinct; transition zone
3.1.4 Measured Values
between sigmoid colon and rec­tum = transition of the taenia into closed longitudinal muscles of the rec­tum
5 Colon length = 1/4 of the length of the
intestine (in adults 140–160cm)
5 Lumen of the colon varies in size: in adults
– Caecum = approx. 6.5 cm (maximum
width approx. 9cm) – Colon ascendens=approx. 5.5cm
3.1.2 Tasks
– Transverse colon approx. 5cm – Descending colon=approx. 4cm
5 Transport of chyme
– Sigmoid colon=approx. 5.5cm
5 Thickening of chyme
– Active Na+ resorption (with diffusion
of H2O)
– Absorption capacity = up to 5 L/day
(9L in total in the whole gastrointesti­nal tract)
– Active secretion of K+, Cl−, HCO
5 Further development of chyme
– Breakdown of the cellulose content by
bacterial colonisation of the colon (1010 bacteria/g faeces)
– Resorption of 40–50% of the bres
3
3.1.5 Characteristic Features
oftheColon
5 Taeniae coli
– 0.5–1 cm wide light bands = shirred
outer longitudinal muscles of the colon – Beginning at cecum-appendix junction
to sigmoid colon – Three Taenia: libera, mesocolica, omen-
talis
5 Haustra coli
– Puffed sleeve-like protrusions of the
3.1.3 Location andClassication
colon between plicae semilunares coli
5 Plicae semilunares coli
5 Five colonic segments from proximal to
distal:
– Caecum (= appendix, coecum) with
appendix vermiformis (= appendix) – Ascending colon – Transverse colon – Descending colon – Colon sigmoideum (= sigma)
– Crescent-shaped mucosal folds of the
colon
5 Appendices epiploicae
– Small sac-like protrusions of the colonic
serosa lled with fatty tissue from tela subserosa
– Located near the Taeniae libera and
mesocolica
Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
51
Veins
5 Veins parallel to the arteries=portal vein/
Henle loop
Lymphatic Drainage (. Fig.3.1)
5 Along the associated arteries 5 Paracolic at the small blood supply vessels
(arcades)
5 Intermediate: Along the main vessels 5 Central: In the area of the aorta
! Caution
Lymphatics along the marginal arter­ies=LN (lymph node) metastases to prox­imal and distal possible: safety distance to the proximal and distal resection bor­der=10cm
3.2 Benign Diseases oftheColon
3
. Fig. 3.1 Lymphatic drainage of the colon. 1 Ileocolic
artery, 2 Right colic artery, 3 Middle colic artery, 4 Left colic artery, 5 Sigmoid arteries, 6 Inferior mesenteric artery
3.1.6 Blood Supply andDrainage
Arteries
5 Superior mesenteric artery (ileocolic
artery+ right colic artery + middle colic artery): Caecum+ appendix +ascending colon+transverse colon
5 Inferior mesenteric artery (left colic
artery+sigmoid artery): left half of trans­verse colon+descending colon+sigmoid colon
5 Riolan anastomosis = anastomoses
between two watershed areas: Between middle colic artery and left colic artery (Ramus ascendens), supply area superior and inferior mesenteric arteries
3.2.1 Diverticulosis
andDiverticulitis
Key Points
5 Acquired benign disease of the colon;
incidence increasing with age
5 Complications: Diverticulitis, hemor-
rhage, abscess, perforation, stenosis…
5 Therapy: primarily conservative; sur-
gery: in case of complications/recur­rent diverticulitis
Denitions
Colon Diverticulum
5 Acquired protrusion of the intestinal wall 5 Diverticulum: Protrusion of the entire
intestinal wall
5 Pseudodiverticulum: Protrusion of the
mucosa + submucosa through muscle­weak gaps of the colon wall
52
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Thomusch
Diverticular Disease
5 Occurrence of symptoms/complications in
the context of diverticulosis
Increased prevalence of colorectal cancer in diverticulosis is not proven.
Complications
3
5 Peridiverticulitis: inammatory process
originating by the colonic diverticulum
5 Pericolitis: spread to the intestinal wall (=
focal pericolitis)
Epidemiology
Diverticulitis (= Pathological)
5 Prevalence of diverticulosis:
– Increases with age – Under 40years=rare – 60years=approx. 30% – 85years=approx. 65%
5 Men:Women=1:1 5 Diverticular disease: clinical symptom-
atic = 10–25% of diverticular carriers (complications in 5%)
5 Diverticulitis: incidence=80–126/100,000
population/year
Etiology/Pathogenesis
5 Multifactorial 5 Increased intraluminal pressure 5 Weakness of the intestinal wall: mostly
passage of the vessels
Sigmoid colon = high pressure zone = increased intraluminal pressure; 90% of diverticula in the sigmoid.
Risk Factors
5 Higher prevalence at older ages 5 Genetic predisposition (e.g. Marfan syn-
drome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, polycys­tic kidney disease)
5 Dietary ber deciency 5 Higher body weight (BMI >30kg/m2) 5 Recurrence rate after acute diverticulitis:
depending on severity (between 2% and 35%) (= guideline)
5 Complicated diverticulitis:
– Relevant mortality (0–13%) – Special risk under immunosuppression
(8–24%)
5 Diverticulitis (see above)
– Development due to stool reten-
tion=bacterial growth in the diverticu­lum=inammation
– Initial lesion before abscess, perforation
5 Diverticular bleeding
– In 5% of diverticula carriers (= hemato-
chezia) – Independently of inammation – Risk = age, nonsteroidal anti-
inammatory drugs, right-sided diver-
ticula (Asian patients)
5 Abscess and/or stula formation
– Severe complications
5 Covered perforation/open perforation
with peritonitis
5 Stenosis
Symptoms
5 Diverticulosis=asymptomatic 5 Diverticulitis:
– Left lower abdominal pain (abrupt
onset, rapidly progressive) – Possibly pressure-painful roller (palpa-
tory) – Fever, nausea, vomiting, dysuria – Change in bowel movements, possibly
blood in the stool – Diverticular bleeding – Painless peranal bleeding – Sustained/Intermittent – Spontaneous healing (80% of cases) – High recurrence rate
Classications
5 Classication of diverticular disease
according to the German S2k guideline of the AWMF (Classication of diverticular disease, CDD) (. Table3.1)
5 Classication according to Hinchey (for
perforated sigmoid diverticulitis) (. Table3.2)
5 Classication according to Hansen and
Stock (for sequence: diverticulosis, diver­ticulitis, complications) (. Table3.3)
Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
. Table 3.1 Classication of diverticulitis/diverticular disease (CDD)
Type 0 Asymptomatic diverticulosis
Incidental nding; asymptomatic
No disease
Type 1 Acute uncomplicated diverticular disease/diverticulitis
Type 1a Diverticulitis/diverticular disease
without environmental reaction
Type 1b Diverticulitis with phlegmonous
bypass reaction
Type 2 Acute complicated diverticulitis
as 1b, additionally:
Type 2a Microabscess
Type 2b Macroabscess Para- or mesocolic abscess (>1cm)
Type 2c Free perforation Free perforation, free air/liquid
Type 2c1 Purulent peritonitis
Type 2c2 Fecal peritonitis
Type 3 Chronic diverticular disease
Recurrent or persistent symptomatic diverticular disease
Type 3a Symptomatic uncomplicated
diverticular disease (SUDD)
Type 3b Recurrent diverticulitis without
complications
Type 3c Recurrent diverticulitis with
complications
Type 4 Diverticular bleeding Detection of the source of bleeding
Symptoms related to the diverticula
Inammatory signs (laboratory): optional
Typical sectional imaging
Inammatory signs (laboratory): obligatory
Sectional imaging: phlegmonous diverticulitis
Covered perforation, small abscess (1cm); minimal paracolic air
Generalized peritonitis
Typical clinical presentation
Inammatory signs (laboratory): optional
Signs of inammation (laboratory) present
Cross-sectional imaging: typical
Detection of stenoses, stulas, conglomerate
53
3
. Table 3.2 Classication of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis according to Hinchey
Division Denition
Hinchey I Local pericolic abscess after perforation into the mesocolon
Hinchey II
IIA IIb
Hinchey III Purulent peritonitis
Hinchey IV Fecal peritonitis
Distant abscess
Circumscribed, drainable distant abscess Diffuse abscess with stula formation
54
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Thomusch
. Table 3.3 Classication according to Hansen
and Stock
Division Denition
5 Cross-sectional imaging: CT with contrast
agent=standard: conrmation of diagno­sis+exclusion of complications
5 Colonoscopy:
– No colonoscopy to conrm the diagno-
Stage 0 Asymptomatic diverticulosis
3
Stage 1 Diverticulitis without intestinal wall
overow, clinically unspecic complaints, inconspicuous CT ndings
Stage 2a Phlegmonous form, on CT
extension into the pericolic fat tissue
Stage 2b Spread of inammation to adjacent
organs by covered perforation, extraluminal gas inclusions in CT or abscess formation
Stage 2c Free perforation, clinical signs of
acute abdomen and evidence of free air
Stage 3 Chronic recurrent, development of
intestinal wall brosis and luminal narrowing
sis of acute diverticulitis (risk of perfo-
ration!) – Important role in lower GI
(gastrointestinal) bleeding and/or to
exclude tumor – Colonoscopy after conservatively
treated diverticulitis and planned elec-
tive sigmoid resection: (Usually after
4–6 weeks, to exclude other relevant
pathologies
! Caution
Colonoscopy in acute inammatory situa­tion=high risk of perforation.
Therapy
Prophylaxis ofDiverticulitis
Diagnosis
Medical History (Medication, Tobacco Consumption)
Primary Prophylaxis
5 Regular physical activity 5 High ber diet 5 Preservation of normal weight
Clinical Examination
5 Abdomen: palpation, auscultation, digital-
rectal examination
5 See below Symptoms 5 Measurement of body temperature
Laboratory Tests
5 Leucocytosis 5 CRP elevation, accelerated blood sedi-
mentation
5 Urine analysis 5 In sepsis: elevated procalcitonin
Diagnostic Imaging
5 Ultrasound examination:
– Bowel wall thickening – Dom sign: Hypo-echoic lesion, eccen-
tric next to the intestinal wall (= inam­matory diverticulum)
– Abscess, fatty tissue compression
Secondary Prophylaxis
5 Insufcient data= no general recommen-
dations possible
5 Prophylaxis of recurrent diverticular dis-
ease:
– Nutrition – Lifestyle – Physical activity – Medications (mesalazine, probiotics,
rifaximin)
Conservative Therapy
Asymptomatic Diverticulosis
5 Primary prophylaxis (see above) 5 Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis with-
out risk factors for a complicated course
– Close clinical and laboratory control – Low recurrence rate – No indication for surgery
Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
55
3
– Antibiotic therapy:
– No acceleration of healing – No prevention of complications/
recurrences
– Exception=in the case of necessary
immunosuppressive drug therapy after transplantation, collagenoses etc.
Complicated Diverticulitis
5 Inpatient treatment 5 If necessary, parenteral uid substitution
in case of insufcient oral uid intake
5 Oral intake of food if necessary (depend-
ing on clinical situation)
5 Parenteral antibiotic therapy 5 For retroperitoneal/paracolic abscesses =
interventional drainage+control
Surgical Therapy
Surgery Indications
5 Emergency surgery:
– CDD Type 2c – Evidence of freely perforated sigmoid
diverticulitis with clinical or radiologi­cal signs of peritonitis
– Failure of conservative therapy in com-
plicated diverticulitis (acute abdomen, sepsis)
– Diverticular hemorrhage with circula-
tory effect or persistent Hb effect that cannot be controlled by interventions
5 Elective surgery in the inammation-free
interval (>3–4weeks):
– Recurrent diverticulitis with structural
changes and complications CDD type 3c (stula formation, stenosis, unclear dignity)
– After successfully treated complicated
diverticulitis CDD type 2b (macroper­foration, abscess)
– Clinically uncomplicated symptomatic
diverticular disease CDD type 3a or chronic recurrent diverticulitis CDD type 3b
– Recurrent, localized, clinically relevant
diverticular bleeding
– Diverticular hemorrhage: endoscopic
hemostasis or angiography with embo­lization not possible
5 Surgery is not indicated:
– Asymptomatic diverticulitis CDD type 0 – Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis
CDD type 1
– In the interval after successful conserva-
tive therapy of complicated sigmoid diverticulitis with microabscess CDD type 2a
– Self-limiting or interventional success-
fully treated diverticular bleeding
Surgical Strategy
5 Objective = removal of the diverticulum
(diverticulitis)-bearing intestinal segment
5 Laparoscopic (or laparoscopic-assisted)
vs. open resection: Laparoscopic= fewer local complications, wound infections, intra-abdominal abscesses, postoperative ileus and fascial dehiscence
5 Standard procedure = sigmoid resec-
tion + primary continuity restoration (if necessary with protective ileostoma) also in case of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis
5 Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage + drain-
age, without resection: if necessary also for Hinchey III
5 Sigmoid resection with primary anasto-
mosis superior to Hartmann’s procedure in the haemodynamically stable and immu­nocompetent patient under 85years of age (Lambrichts etal. (2019) Lancet 4(8), 599–
610)
! Caution
Continuity restoration after Hartmann resection (discontinuity resection with rec­tal blind closure and terminal stoma) occurs in only about 50% of patients and is associated with substantial morbidity (44%) and lethality (5%).
5 Technical aspects:
– Proximal resection margin: In any case
proximal to the chronically or acutely inammatory altered wall sections in the healthy intestine