Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1004_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Small Intestine andAppendix
https://t.me/medicina_free
45
2
– Appendectomy: resect appendiceal
mesentery (for histological examination
of lymph nodes)+prevent rupture (in
case of manipulation/extraction)
– Right hemicolectomy only in case of
inltration of the residual limb
Ruptured Mucocele (= Pseudomyxoma
Peritonei/Mucinous Carcinomatosis)
5 Rupture = displacement of epithelial
cells+mucus in the peritoneal space
5 Clinical Presentation:
– Appendicitis signs
– Increased abdominal girth
– Ovarian mass
– Inguinal hernia
5 Treatment: CRS (cytoreductive sur-
gery)+HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy)
Forecast
Prognostic Factors
5 Extent of the peritoneal tumor conglom-
erate
5 Histological grade of the tumor
Carcinoid Tumors: Neuroendocrine
Tumors oftheAppendix
5 Carcinoid tumors of the appendix=part
of the carcinoids of the midgut (common
embryological origin)
5 Terminology: carcinoids of the appen-
dix = well-differentiated neuroendocrine
tumors (NET) of the appendix
5 Histology: NET = enterochromafn cells
(expression of S-100)
5 NET = malignant tumours with benign
behaviour pattern
Epidemiology
5 Appendix-NET=5% of all intestinal car-
cinoids
5 Mostly in patients around 40years of age
5 Appendiceal carcinoids <1cm+not local-
ized in appendiceal base=90%
– Appendectomy=sufcient treatment
– Mostly retrospective postoperative
diagnosis
Diagnosis
5 Depending on the presence of a Clinical
Presentation
Course oftheDisease
5 In most patients: Dissemination of tumor
cells in the abdomen at the time of diagnosis
5 Most of these neoplasms are noninvasive
5 Metastases = rare; locoregional recur-
rence=frequent (ileus)
Survival
5 Without treatment: Very poor prognosis
(no chance of cure+very limited survival)
5 With aggressive CRS + HIPEC: 5-year
survival = 50–96% in selected patient
groups (if no distant metastases + complete cytoreduction)
5 CRS+HIPEC must be performed early in
the disease history
Non-functional NET
5 Slow growing
5 Mostly years until rst symptoms and
diagnosis
5 Mostly diagnosis in the context of surgery
(pathology)
Functional NET
5 Carcinoid syndrome: hormonal produc-
tion=symptoms+dosable products
5 Marker:
– 5-HIAA (degradation product of sero-
tonin) test in urine
– Chromogranin A
– Serotonin

46
CU
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Mutter
Environment Diagnosis
5 As with other NET: possibility of other
gastrointestinal genitourinary tumors
2
5 Colonoscopy: to exclude other colon
tumors
5 Other screening examination depending
on age and other risk factors
– Treatment controversial
– Hemicolectomy on the right:
– When inltration of the mesoappen-
dix
– If R1 at the resection margin
– If N+ (lymph node metastases)
– In case of high proliferation activity
(high Ki67 index), high mitotic
Treatment (According
toRecommendations
oftheAmerican National Cancer
Institute andENETS)
5 . Figure2.1
5 NET <1cm, not in appendix base
– Appendectomy
5 NET >2cm
– Hemicolectomy right+ileocecal lymph-
adenectomy (risk of metastases)
5 1cm<NET<2cm
ENETS ENETS
Tumor size
T Classication
Inltration
Mesoappendix
or Serosa
<1 cm 1–2 cm 2–4 cm1–2 cm≤1 cm > 2 cm
T1 T2 T3T1aT1b
0– ––
Goblet Cell Carcinoid or Adenocarcinoid
Aftercare
<3 mm**
index, angioinvasion
– If mixed histology (goblet cell
carcinoid)
5 Rare variant with mixed endocrine and exocrine
properties
5 Associated with poor prognosis
5 Monitoring in patients with elevated chromo-
granin A (indicator for extended resection)
ENETSUICC/AJCC UICC/AJC ICC/AJCC
T2(or >)
>3 mm**
Localization Tip/Middle
and R0*
End of therapy
. Fig. 2.1 Treatment algorithm of NETs of the vermi-
form appendix according to the recommendations of
the American National Cancer Institute and the
ENETS* R0=tumor-free resection margins** very lim-
Appendectomy Appendectomy
Base or
R1
No risk factor*** Discuss risk factor***
Tip/Middle
and R0*
Right Hemicolectomy (with
lymphadenectomy)
ited evidence*** risk factors are: V1 (histologic vascular
invasion)—L1 (histologic lymphatic vascular invasion)—G2 grading—>3 mm inltration or inltration
of the mesoappendix
Base or
R1

Small Intestine andAppendix
https://t.me/medicina_free
47
2
5 Survival:
– Excellent for locoregional tumors
– Tumours with distant metastases:
10-year survival=30%
Noncarcinoid Tumors
oftheAppendix
5 Appendix=possible location of all intesti-
nal tumors
5 Rare tumor entities
Classication According toWorld
Health Organisation (WHO)
Table2.2)
(.
5 Epithelial tumors
5 Non-epithelial tumors
. Table 2.2 Histological WHO classication
of appendiceal tumours
Epithelial tumors Non-epithelial
tumors
Adenoma
Tubular
Villös
Tubulovillous
Serrated
Carcinoma
Adenocarcinoma
Mucinous adenocarci-
noma
Signet ring cell carcinoma
Small cell carcinoma
Non-differentiated
carcinoma
Carcinoid (well differentiated neuroendocrine
neoplasia)
Tubular carcinoid Hyperplastic
Goblet cell carcinoid
(mucinous carcinoid)
Mixed carcinoid adenocarcinoma
Other
Neuroma
Lipoma
Leiomyoma
Gastrointestinal
stromal tumor
Leiomyosarcoma
Kaposi’s sarcoma
Other
Malignant
lymphoma
Secondary tumors
(metaplastic)
polyp
Overview: Appendix Adenocarcinoma
5 Rare: 0.08% of all carcinomas
5 Mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma=most fre-
quent subtype (better prognosis after resection)
Clinical Presentation
5 Appendicitis in the elderly patient
5 Mucocele
Treatment
5 Hemicolectomy right = standard proce-
dure
5 Drug treatment/chemotherapy for specic
diseases (lymphomas etc.)
References
Spirt MJ (2010) Complicated intra-abdominal infec-
tions: a focus on appendicitis and diverticulitis.
Postgrad Med 122:39–51
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and
efcacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled
trials. BMJ 5:344
Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M,
Costaglioli B, Karoui M, Alves A, Dousset B,
Valleur P, Falissard B, Franco D (2011) Amoxicillin
plus clavulanic acid versus appendectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an openlabel, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial.
Lancet 377:1573–1579

Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
OliverThomusch
Contents
3.1 Anatomy andPhysiology – 50
3.1.1 Denition andLimits – 50
3.1.2 Tasks – 50
3.1.3 Location andClassication – 50
3.1.4 Measured Values – 50
3.1.5 Characteristic Features oftheColon – 50
3.1.6 Blood Supply andDrainage – 51
3.2 Benign Diseases oftheColon – 51
3.2.1 Diverticulosis andDiverticulitis – 51
3.2.2 Colonic Polyps – 56
3.2.3 Ulcerative Colitis – 57
3.2.4 Chronic Constipation – 61
3.2.5 Guidelines – 64
49
3
3.3 Colon Cancer andHereditary
CRC Syndromes – 64
3.3.1 Colon Carcinoma – 64
3.3.2 HNPCC (Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal
Cancer): Lynch Syndrome – 71
3.3.3 Other Hereditary CRC Syndromes – 75
3.3.4 Guidelines – 75
Reference – 76
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer
Nature 2023
F. Billmann, T. Keck (eds.), Essentials of Visceral Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66735-4_3

50
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Thomusch
3.1 Anatomy andPhysiology
5 Position of the colon in relation to the
peritoenum
– Caecum (distal part)+appendix: Intra-
3.1.1 Denition andLimits
peritoneal
– Caecum (proximal part): Secondary ret-
3
5 Denition
– Colon = Intestinum crassum, part of
the gastrointestinal tract
– Distally from the small intestine, proxi-
mal from the rectum
5 Limits
– Proximal= ileocecal valve (= Bauhin);
roperitoneal
– Ascending colon: Secondary retroperi-
toneal
– Transverse colon: Intraperitoneal
– Descending colon: Secondary retroperi-
toneal
– Sigmoid colon: Intraperitoneal
border between terminal ileum and
colon
– Distal = indistinct; transition zone
3.1.4 Measured Values
between sigmoid colon and rectum = transition of the taenia into
closed longitudinal muscles of the rectum
5 Colon length = 1/4 of the length of the
intestine (in adults 140–160cm)
5 Lumen of the colon varies in size: in adults
– Caecum = approx. 6.5 cm (maximum
width approx. 9cm)
– Colon ascendens=approx. 5.5cm
3.1.2 Tasks
– Transverse colon approx. 5cm
– Descending colon=approx. 4cm
5 Transport of chyme
– Sigmoid colon=approx. 5.5cm
5 Thickening of chyme
– Active Na+ resorption (with diffusion
of H2O)
– Absorption capacity = up to 5 L/day
(9L in total in the whole gastrointestinal tract)
– Active secretion of K+, Cl−, HCO
5 Further development of chyme
– Breakdown of the cellulose content by
bacterial colonisation of the colon (1010
bacteria/g faeces)
– Resorption of 40–50% of the bres
−
3
3.1.5 Characteristic Features
oftheColon
5 Taeniae coli
– 0.5–1 cm wide light bands = shirred
outer longitudinal muscles of the colon
– Beginning at cecum-appendix junction
to sigmoid colon
– Three Taenia: libera, mesocolica, omen-
talis
5 Haustra coli
– Puffed sleeve-like protrusions of the
3.1.3 Location andClassication
colon between plicae semilunares coli
5 Plicae semilunares coli
5 Five colonic segments from proximal to
distal:
– Caecum (= appendix, coecum) with
appendix vermiformis (= appendix)
– Ascending colon
– Transverse colon
– Descending colon
– Colon sigmoideum (= sigma)
– Crescent-shaped mucosal folds of the
colon
5 Appendices epiploicae
– Small sac-like protrusions of the colonic
serosa lled with fatty tissue from tela
subserosa
– Located near the Taeniae libera and
mesocolica

Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
51
Veins
5 Veins parallel to the arteries=portal vein/
Henle loop
Lymphatic Drainage (. Fig.3.1)
5 Along the associated arteries
5 Paracolic at the small blood supply vessels
(arcades)
5 Intermediate: Along the main vessels
5 Central: In the area of the aorta
! Caution
Lymphatics along the marginal arteries=LN (lymph node) metastases to proximal and distal possible: safety distance to
the proximal and distal resection border=10cm
3.2 Benign Diseases oftheColon
3
. Fig. 3.1 Lymphatic drainage of the colon. 1 Ileocolic
artery, 2 Right colic artery, 3 Middle colic artery, 4 Left
colic artery, 5 Sigmoid arteries, 6 Inferior mesenteric
artery
3.1.6 Blood Supply andDrainage
Arteries
5 Superior mesenteric artery (ileocolic
artery+ right colic artery + middle colic
artery): Caecum+ appendix +ascending
colon+transverse colon
5 Inferior mesenteric artery (left colic
artery+sigmoid artery): left half of transverse colon+descending colon+sigmoid
colon
5 Riolan anastomosis = anastomoses
between two watershed areas: Between
middle colic artery and left colic artery
(Ramus ascendens), supply area superior
and inferior mesenteric arteries
3.2.1 Diverticulosis
andDiverticulitis
Key Points
5 Acquired benign disease of the colon;
incidence increasing with age
5 Complications: Diverticulitis, hemor-
rhage, abscess, perforation, stenosis…
5 Therapy: primarily conservative; sur-
gery: in case of complications/recurrent diverticulitis
Denitions
Colon Diverticulum
5 Acquired protrusion of the intestinal wall
5 Diverticulum: Protrusion of the entire
intestinal wall
5 Pseudodiverticulum: Protrusion of the
mucosa + submucosa through muscleweak gaps of the colon wall

52
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Thomusch
Diverticular Disease
5 Occurrence of symptoms/complications in
the context of diverticulosis
Increased prevalence of colorectal cancer in diverticulosis
is not proven.
Complications
3
5 Peridiverticulitis: inammatory process
originating by the colonic diverticulum
5 Pericolitis: spread to the intestinal wall (=
focal pericolitis)
Epidemiology
Diverticulitis (= Pathological)
5 Prevalence of diverticulosis:
– Increases with age
– Under 40years=rare
– 60years=approx. 30%
– 85years=approx. 65%
5 Men:Women=1:1
5 Diverticular disease: clinical symptom-
atic = 10–25% of diverticular carriers
(complications in 5%)
5 Diverticulitis: incidence=80–126/100,000
population/year
Etiology/Pathogenesis
5 Multifactorial
5 Increased intraluminal pressure
5 Weakness of the intestinal wall: mostly
passage of the vessels
Sigmoid colon = high pressure zone = increased
intraluminal pressure; 90% of diverticula in the sigmoid.
Risk Factors
5 Higher prevalence at older ages
5 Genetic predisposition (e.g. Marfan syn-
drome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, polycystic kidney disease)
5 Dietary ber deciency
5 Higher body weight (BMI >30kg/m2)
5 Recurrence rate after acute diverticulitis:
depending on severity (between 2% and
35%) (= guideline)
5 Complicated diverticulitis:
– Relevant mortality (0–13%)
– Special risk under immunosuppression
(8–24%)
5 Diverticulitis (see above)
– Development due to stool reten-
tion=bacterial growth in the diverticulum=inammation
– Initial lesion before abscess, perforation
5 Diverticular bleeding
– In 5% of diverticula carriers (= hemato-
chezia)
– Independently of inammation
– Risk = age, nonsteroidal anti-
inammatory drugs, right-sided diver-
ticula (Asian patients)
5 Abscess and/or stula formation
– Severe complications
5 Covered perforation/open perforation
with peritonitis
5 Stenosis
Symptoms
5 Diverticulosis=asymptomatic
5 Diverticulitis:
– Left lower abdominal pain (abrupt
onset, rapidly progressive)
– Possibly pressure-painful roller (palpa-
tory)
– Fever, nausea, vomiting, dysuria
– Change in bowel movements, possibly
blood in the stool
– Diverticular bleeding
– Painless peranal bleeding
– Sustained/Intermittent
– Spontaneous healing (80% of cases)
– High recurrence rate
Classications
5 Classication of diverticular disease
according to the German S2k guideline of
the AWMF (Classication of diverticular
disease, CDD) (. Table3.1)
5 Classication according to Hinchey (for
perforated sigmoid diverticulitis)
(. Table3.2)
5 Classication according to Hansen and
Stock (for sequence: diverticulosis, diverticulitis, complications) (. Table3.3)

Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
. Table 3.1 Classication of diverticulitis/diverticular disease (CDD)
Type 0 Asymptomatic diverticulosis
Incidental nding; asymptomatic
No disease
Type 1 Acute uncomplicated diverticular disease/diverticulitis
Type 1a Diverticulitis/diverticular disease
without environmental reaction
Type 1b Diverticulitis with phlegmonous
bypass reaction
Type 2 Acute complicated diverticulitis
as 1b, additionally:
Type 2a Microabscess
Type 2b Macroabscess Para- or mesocolic abscess (>1cm)
Type 2c Free perforation Free perforation, free air/liquid
Type 2c1 Purulent peritonitis
Type 2c2 Fecal peritonitis
Type 3 Chronic diverticular disease
Recurrent or persistent symptomatic diverticular disease
Type 3a Symptomatic uncomplicated
diverticular disease (SUDD)
Type 3b Recurrent diverticulitis without
complications
Type 3c Recurrent diverticulitis with
complications
Type 4 Diverticular bleeding Detection of the source of bleeding
Symptoms related to the diverticula
Inammatory signs (laboratory): optional
Typical sectional imaging
Inammatory signs (laboratory): obligatory
Sectional imaging: phlegmonous diverticulitis
Covered perforation, small abscess (≤1cm); minimal
paracolic air
Generalized peritonitis
Typical clinical presentation
Inammatory signs (laboratory): optional
Signs of inammation (laboratory) present
Cross-sectional imaging: typical
Detection of stenoses, stulas, conglomerate
53
3
. Table 3.2 Classication of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis according to Hinchey
Division Denition
Hinchey I Local pericolic abscess after perforation into the mesocolon
Hinchey II
IIA
IIb
Hinchey III Purulent peritonitis
Hinchey IV Fecal peritonitis
Distant abscess
Circumscribed, drainable distant abscess
Diffuse abscess with stula formation

54
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Thomusch
. Table 3.3 Classication according to Hansen
and Stock
Division Denition
5 Cross-sectional imaging: CT with contrast
agent=standard: conrmation of diagnosis+exclusion of complications
5 Colonoscopy:
– No colonoscopy to conrm the diagno-
Stage 0 Asymptomatic diverticulosis
3
Stage 1 Diverticulitis without intestinal wall
overow, clinically unspecic
complaints, inconspicuous CT
ndings
Stage 2a Phlegmonous form, on CT
extension into the pericolic fat tissue
Stage 2b Spread of inammation to adjacent
organs by covered perforation,
extraluminal gas inclusions in CT or
abscess formation
Stage 2c Free perforation, clinical signs of
acute abdomen and evidence of free
air
Stage 3 Chronic recurrent, development of
intestinal wall brosis and luminal
narrowing
sis of acute diverticulitis (risk of perfo-
ration!)
– Important role in lower GI
(gastrointestinal) bleeding and/or to
exclude tumor
– Colonoscopy after conservatively
treated diverticulitis and planned elec-
tive sigmoid resection: (Usually after
4–6 weeks, to exclude other relevant
pathologies
! Caution
Colonoscopy in acute inammatory situation=high risk of perforation.
Therapy
Prophylaxis ofDiverticulitis
Diagnosis
Medical History (Medication, Tobacco
Consumption)
Primary Prophylaxis
5 Regular physical activity
5 High ber diet
5 Preservation of normal weight
Clinical Examination
5 Abdomen: palpation, auscultation, digital-
rectal examination
5 See below Symptoms
5 Measurement of body temperature
Laboratory Tests
5 Leucocytosis
5 CRP elevation, accelerated blood sedi-
mentation
5 Urine analysis
5 In sepsis: elevated procalcitonin
Diagnostic Imaging
5 Ultrasound examination:
– Bowel wall thickening
– Dom sign: Hypo-echoic lesion, eccen-
tric next to the intestinal wall (= inammatory diverticulum)
– Abscess, fatty tissue compression
Secondary Prophylaxis
5 Insufcient data= no general recommen-
dations possible
5 Prophylaxis of recurrent diverticular dis-
ease:
– Nutrition
– Lifestyle
– Physical activity
– Medications (mesalazine, probiotics,
rifaximin)
Conservative Therapy
Asymptomatic Diverticulosis
5 Primary prophylaxis (see above)
5 Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis with-
out risk factors for a complicated course
– Close clinical and laboratory control
– Low recurrence rate
– No indication for surgery

Colon
https://t.me/medicina_free
55
3
– Antibiotic therapy:
– No acceleration of healing
– No prevention of complications/
recurrences
– Exception=in the case of necessary
immunosuppressive drug therapy
after transplantation, collagenoses
etc.
Complicated Diverticulitis
5 Inpatient treatment
5 If necessary, parenteral uid substitution
in case of insufcient oral uid intake
5 Oral intake of food if necessary (depend-
ing on clinical situation)
5 Parenteral antibiotic therapy
5 For retroperitoneal/paracolic abscesses =
interventional drainage+control
Surgical Therapy
Surgery Indications
5 Emergency surgery:
– CDD Type 2c
– Evidence of freely perforated sigmoid
diverticulitis with clinical or radiological signs of peritonitis
– Failure of conservative therapy in com-
plicated diverticulitis (acute abdomen,
sepsis)
– Diverticular hemorrhage with circula-
tory effect or persistent Hb effect that
cannot be controlled by interventions
5 Elective surgery in the inammation-free
interval (>3–4weeks):
– Recurrent diverticulitis with structural
changes and complications CDD type
3c (stula formation, stenosis, unclear
dignity)
– After successfully treated complicated
diverticulitis CDD type 2b (macroperforation, abscess)
– Clinically uncomplicated symptomatic
diverticular disease CDD type 3a or
chronic recurrent diverticulitis CDD
type 3b
– Recurrent, localized, clinically relevant
diverticular bleeding
– Diverticular hemorrhage: endoscopic
hemostasis or angiography with embolization not possible
5 Surgery is not indicated:
– Asymptomatic diverticulitis CDD type 0
– Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis
CDD type 1
– In the interval after successful conserva-
tive therapy of complicated sigmoid
diverticulitis with microabscess CDD
type 2a
– Self-limiting or interventional success-
fully treated diverticular bleeding
Surgical Strategy
5 Objective = removal of the diverticulum
(diverticulitis)-bearing intestinal segment
5 Laparoscopic (or laparoscopic-assisted)
vs. open resection: Laparoscopic= fewer
local complications, wound infections,
intra-abdominal abscesses, postoperative
ileus and fascial dehiscence
5 Standard procedure = sigmoid resec-
tion + primary continuity restoration (if
necessary with protective ileostoma) also
in case of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis
5 Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage + drain-
age, without resection: if necessary also for
Hinchey III
5 Sigmoid resection with primary anasto-
mosis superior to Hartmann’s procedure
in the haemodynamically stable and immunocompetent patient under 85years of age
(Lambrichts etal. (2019) Lancet 4(8), 599–
610)
! Caution
Continuity restoration after Hartmann
resection (discontinuity resection with rectal blind closure and terminal stoma)
occurs in only about 50% of patients and
is associated with substantial morbidity
(44%) and lethality (5%).
5 Technical aspects:
– Proximal resection margin: In any case
proximal to the chronically or acutely
inammatory altered wall sections in
the healthy intestine
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
