Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5529_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
284 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates both innate and adaptive immune responses. Upon activation, AhR signaling can promote the generation of Tregs and suppress Th17 differen­tiation, similar to SCFA effects, though via a distinct molecular pathway. Dysbiosis that results in lower levels of these tryptophan metabolites compromises AhR signaling and thereby contributes to the expansion of inammatory T-cell subsets. Notably, studies using germ-free mice or mice colonized with altered microbial compositions show exacerbated autoimmune symptoms, which can be ameliorated by reintroducing specic metabolite-producing strains or supplementing the metabolites directly.
These ndings underscore the critical role of the gut microbiota as a regulatory hub that inte­grates environmental, dietary, and immunological signals to orchestrate immune homeostasis. Importantly, they reveal that immune cell differentiation is not solely a host-intrinsic process but is dynamically inuenced by the microbial consortia residing in the gastrointestinal tract. In auto­immune diseases, the balance between tolerance and inammation is frequently disturbed, and the loss of regulatory microbial signals tilts the immune equilibrium toward pathogenic inam­mation. Therapeutic strategies that aim to restore benecial microbial metabolites (either through dietary interventions, probiotics, prebiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation) are therefore being explored as innovative approaches to reestablish immune tolerance.
Furthermore, recent metagenomic and metabolomic studies in patients with autoimmune dis­eases have consistently shown reduced levels of SCFAs and altered tryptophan metabolism. For example, patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease exhibit signicantly lower fecal butyr­ate concentrations, correlating with disease severity and increased Th17 inltration in the intestinal mucosa. Similar patterns have been observed in MS, where the gut microbiota composition favors species that promote Th17 over Treg differentiation. These clinical ndings are further supported by animal models, in which administration of butyrate or tryptophan metabolites ameliorates dis­ease symptoms and restores immune balance.
9.2.5 CHRONIC IMMUNE STIMULATION
Chronic immune stimulation by persistent bacterial antigens or endotoxins represents a powerful and insidious driver of immune system dysregulation. The immune system is designed to recognize and eliminate microbial invaders efciently, mounting a robust but self-limited response that resolves with pathogen clearance. However, in certain scenarios, components of bacterial pathogens (such as LPS, peptidoglycans, and unmethylated Cytosine–Phosphate–Guanine dinucleotide (CpG) DNA) may lin­ger in host tissues due to persistent infection, biolm formation, or even translocation of microbial products from mucosal barriers like the gut. These microbial molecules act as potent PAMPs, con­tinuously engaging PRRs such as TLRs and NOD-like receptors (NLRs). This ongoing signaling cascade sustains the activation of innate immune cells, leading to a pro-inammatory environment marked by elevated cytokine production, tissue inltration by immune cells, and activation of APCs.
Under physiological conditions, immune tolerance mechanisms (including regulatory T cells (Tregs), immune checkpoint pathways, and central deletion of autoreactive clones) maintain the balance between immune defense and self-tolerance. However, when the immune system is sub­jected to persistent bacterial stimuli, these regulatory networks may become overwhelmed or dys­functional. Continuous exposure to endotoxins such as LPS can desensitize TLR signaling, but paradoxically may also lead to chronic low-grade inammation, sometimes referred to as “inam­maging” in elderly individuals. Monocytes and dendritic cells exposed to persistent LPS signaling often undergo phenotypic changes, skewing toward a semi-activated state that continuously secretes inammatory mediators like TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. This persistent activation distorts antigen presentation and disrupts peripheral tolerance, priming the immune system to react against self­antigens in genetically or epigenetically susceptible individuals.
Over time, this shift from a regulated, homeostatic immune response to a chronically inamed state can have profound consequences. One major pathological outcome is the breakdown of
285 Roles of Bacteria in Autoimmune Diseases
tolerance and the initiation of autoimmunity. Chronic bacterial antigen exposure can induce epi­tope spreading, a process by which the immune response initially directed at microbial antigens begins to target structurally similar or co-localized self-antigens. Furthermore, repeated activa­tion of Bcells by microbial antigens in a pro-inammatory cytokine environment promotes class switching and somatic hypermutation, which may inadvertently result in the generation of autoreac­tive B cell clones. These clones can differentiate into plasma cells that secrete autoantibodies, such as anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), depending on the tissue environment and context.
The generation of autoantibodies marks a critical transition from a merely dysregulated immune system to one actively participating in autoimmune disease pathology. These antibodies can form immune complexes that deposit in tissues, activate complement, and recruit effector cells, lead­ing to further inammation and tissue damage. In diseases like SLE, chronic immune stimulation is believed to be one of the initiating events, particularly through exposure to bacterial DNA or nucleoprotein antigens. In RA, translocation of gut bacterial products may contribute to the ini­tial citrullination of host proteins in the lungs or synovium, subsequently targeted by the adaptive immune system.
Recent metagenomic and transcriptomic studies have revealed that patients with autoimmune diseases often harbor a distinct microbial signature characterized by increased abundance of patho­bionts (commensal bacteria that can become harmful under certain conditions) and decreased microbial diversity. These microbial communities may produce metabolites or antigens that perpet­uate immune activation. Additionally, gut barrier dysfunction, commonly termed “leaky gut”, has been implicated in allowing bacterial endotoxins to enter systemic circulation, acting as a chronic stimulus for immune activation. This supports the hypothesis that the gut-immune axis is not merely involved in nutrient absorption and digestion but also plays a central role in systemic immune regu­lation and the pathogenesis of autoimmunity.
At the molecular level, the persistent activation of intracellular signaling pathways such as NF-κB, STAT3, and MAPKs in response to bacterial products promotes the transcription of genes involved in inammation, cell survival, and antigen presentation. Chronic stimulation of these pathways can lead to the exhaustion of regulatory cell populations and the expansion of pro-inammatory Th subsets like Th17 cells, which are commonly found in autoimmune lesions. IL-17, a hallmark cytokine of this lineage, promotes neutrophil recruitment, matrix degradation, and further ampli­es the inammatory cascade. In animal models, blocking IL-17 or its receptor has been shown to ameliorate autoimmune pathology induced by persistent microbial stimuli.
Taken together, chronic immune stimulation by bacterial antigens or endotoxins acts as a danger­ous double-edged sword. While intended as a defense mechanism, its persistent activation creates a pathological loop where inammation breeds more inammation, self-tolerance is progressively eroded, and the immune system begins to perceive host tissues as foreign. The chronicity of the stimulus appears to be a key determinant; transient exposure to bacteria often leads to resolution and memory, but persistent exposure drives dysfunction and disease. As a result, therapeutic strate­gies that restore mucosal barriers, modulate the microbiome, or block chronic PRR signaling are emerging as promising avenues for preventing or managing autoimmune diseases rooted in micro­bial persistence.
9.2.6 EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONS
Epigenetic modications serve as a crucial interface between environmental stimuli and gene regu­lation, providing a exible and reversible mechanism through which cells adapt to external cues. In the context of autoimmunity, the role of epigenetics becomes especially signicant when consider­ing microbial inuences. Among these, bacterial components (such as toxins, metabolites, and cell wall elements) have emerged as powerful modulators of the host epigenome. These microbial sig­nals do not act indiscriminately but instead interact with the host immune system in context-specic
286 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
manners, inuencing the development, function, and fate of immune cells. Increasingly, research indicates that bacterial factors can alter the host’s epigenetic landscape in a way that promotes chronic inammation, immune dysregulation, and even breaks in self-tolerance, culminating in autoimmune disease.
DNA methylation, one of the most extensively studied epigenetic modications, involves the addition of a methyl group to cytosine residues, particularly within CpG islands in gene promoter regions. This process typically represses gene transcription. Certain bacterial metabolites, espe­cially SCFAs like butyrate and propionate (produced by gut microbiota during the fermentation of dietary bers) have been shown to affect DNA methylation patterns in immune cells. Butyrate, for example, is known to inhibit histone deacetylases (HDACs), thereby inuencing the chroma­tin structure and indirectly affecting DNA methylation. While SCFAs can have anti-inammatory effects under normal conditions, imbalances in their concentration or altered microbial composition (dysbiosis) may lead to inappropriate epigenetic changes. In dendritic cells and macrophages, for instance, this can result in aberrant expression of co-stimulatory molecules and pro-inammatory cytokines that drive autoimmune responses.
Bacterial toxins offer another route through which the epigenome is modulated. For example, the cytotoxins produced by Clostridium perfringens and H. pylori can interfere with chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation in T and B lymphocytes. Some of these toxins have been reported to disrupt histone modication patterns (such as acetylation and methylation), lead­ing to sustained activation of genes involved in inammation and immune activation. Specically, alterations in histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) or histone acetylation states may prime immune cells for hyper-responsiveness or dysregulated memory formation. These changes can persist even after the resolution of infection, suggesting a form of “epigenetic memory” that predisposes the immune system to overreact to future stimuli, including self-antigens.
A striking example is the modulation of Th cell differentiation by bacterial signals through histone modication. Studies show that exposure to bacterial LPS and peptidoglycan, both potent immune activators, induces epigenetic remodeling in naïve CD4+ T cells. These changes skew their differentiation toward Th17 or Th1 phenotypes, which are known to be implicated in several auto­immune diseases such as MS, RA, and inammatory bowel disease. Through the upregulation of transcription factors like RORγt and T-bet, bacterial components can effectively reprogram immune responses toward a pro-inammatory trajectory. Such a skewing is often supported by histone acet­ylation at enhancer regions of pro-inammatory cytokine genes like IL-17 and IFN-γ, reinforcing a chronic inammatory state.
Beyond histones and DNA methylation, non-coding RNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs) also play an epigenetic role in shaping immune responses, and bacteria are known to inuence their expression. Several pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis and E. coli, have been shown to induce or repress specic host miRNAs that control genes involved in inammation and cell death. These miRNAs may inhibit negative regulators of inammation or suppress signaling path­ways that normally promote immune tolerance. For instance, bacterial modulation of miR-155 and miR-146a has been implicated in autoimmune pathology through the enhancement of NF-κB sig­naling and reduction of regulatory T-cell function.
Importantly, these epigenetic modications are not isolated events but are often coordinated in a context-dependent manner, inuenced by the tissue microenvironment, host genetic background, and duration of bacterial exposure. In genetically susceptible individuals, the cumulative effect of microbial-induced epigenetic changes may tip the balance toward autoimmunity. For example, indi­viduals carrying risk alleles in genes related to epigenetic regulation, such as MECP2 or DNMT3A, may be more vulnerable to the epigenomic insults triggered by bacterial metabolites or toxins. In such cases, the epigenetic changes not only contribute to disease onset but may also inuence its progression and response to therapy.
Moreover, the reversibility of epigenetic marks offers both a challenge and an opportunity. While persistent epigenetic reprogramming can sustain autoimmune pathology long after the initial
287 Roles of Bacteria in Autoimmune Diseases
microbial insult, it also provides a potential therapeutic avenue. Interventions targeting HDACs, DNA methyltransferases, or histone methyltransferases are being explored to reverse pathological gene expression programs in autoimmune diseases. Understanding the specic bacterial triggers and the epigenetic pathways they engage can lead to the development of precision microbiome­based or epigenetic therapies.
9.3 METAGENOMICS IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES
Metagenomics has emerged as a powerful tool for understanding the complex interplay between microbial communities and autoimmune diseases. Two primary approaches dominate metagenom­ics studies: amplicon-based sequencing, often targeting the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene for bacteria or internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions for fungi, and shotgun metagenomic sequenc- ing, which provides comprehensive insights into the taxonomic and functional composition of entire microbial communities. In autoimmune disease research, these approaches have revealed consistent patterns of microbial dysbiosis, imbalances in the normal gut or mucosal microbiota, which may contribute to the onset or progression of diseases such as RA, SLE, T1D, and MS.
Amplicon-based metagenomics offers a cost-effective method to prole microbial diversity, par­ticularly useful in large cohort studies. Recent ndings using 16S rRNA gene sequencing have identied a reduced diversity and altered abundance of specic taxa, such as P. copri, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Bacteroides species, in individuals with autoimmune diseases. These microbial shifts may inuence mucosal immunity, intestinal barrier function, and systemic inammation. Studies have demonstrated that in diseases like RA, the presence of P. copri is often associated with disease onset and elevated inammatory markers. Similarly, in T1D, early-life microbiome changes identied through amplicon sequencing precede autoantibody production, suggesting a potential predictive role of microbial biomarkers.
Shotgun metagenomic sequencing provides a deeper resolution, enabling researchers not only to identify species-level changes but also to infer microbial metabolic pathways, gene content, and potential virulence factors. In recent applications, shotgun metagenomics has been used to reveal functional alterations in the gut microbiome of autoimmune patients, such as the depletion of short­chain fatty acid-producing genes and enrichment of genes associated with oxidative stress and LPS biosynthesis. These functional disruptions may promote an inammatory gut environment and aberrant immune activation. For instance, in SLE, shotgun sequencing has revealed an enrichment of microbial genes encoding ribosomal proteins and agellar assembly, potential drivers of innate immune stimulation via PRRs.
Both metagenomics approaches have also enabled the development of microbiome-based clas­siers and risk models for predicting autoimmune disease susceptibility and monitoring treatment response. Integration with host genomic and transcriptomic data has begun to unravel host–microbe interactions at unprecedented resolution. Furthermore, recent research is increasingly applying machine learning models to large metagenomic datasets to identify microbial signatures predic­tive of disease subtypes or progression. As sequencing technologies advance and more longitu­dinal datasets become available, metagenomics will continue to play a critical role in uncovering the microbial component of autoimmune pathogenesis, opening new avenues for diagnostics and microbiota-targeted therapies.
9.3.1 AMPLICON-BASED METAGENOMICS WORKFLOW
Amplicon-based metagenomics is a targeted approach that focuses on amplifying and sequenc­ing specic genomic regions, most commonly the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria, 18S rRNA or ITS regions for fungi, and other taxonomically informative markers for different microbial groups. The workow begins with the careful collection of biological samples such as stool, saliva, skin swabs, or mucosal biopsies from both healthy individuals and those diagnosed with autoimmune diseases.
288 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
These samples must be handled with strict protocols to prevent contamination and preserve micro­bial DNA integrity. DNA is then extracted using optimized lysis protocols that account for the wide diversity in microbial cell wall structures. Once DNA is extracted, specic hypervariable regions of the marker genes are amplied using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with barcoded primers, allowing multiplexing of samples. The resulting amplicons are puried and prepared for sequencing, commonly using platforms such as Illumina MiSeq or NovaSeq, which provide high­throughput and accurate reads suitable for taxonomic classication.
The bioinformatics analysis of amplicon-based data has been greatly streamlined with the use of QIIME 2 (Bolyen et al., 2019), which is a widely used, open-source bioinformatics platform designed for analyzing and interpreting amplicon-based metagenomic data, particularly from marker genes such as the 16S rRNA gene in bacteria and archaea, the ITS region in fungi, or 18S rRNA in eukaryotes. The pipeline begins with importing raw sequence data, typically demulti­plexed FASTQ (FAST Quality) les, which are read into the QIIME 2 environment using spe­cic formats that recognize metadata structures and sequencing formats. Once imported, the reads undergo a quality control step where sequences are ltered, trimmed, and denoised using tools like DADA2 or Deblur, which remove noise and chimeras while producing high-resolution amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). This denoising process is critical because it resolves sequences at the single-nucleotide level, increasing taxonomic resolution beyond traditional Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) clustering approaches (Callahan et al., 2016).
Following denoising, a feature table is generated that records the frequency of each ASV in every sample. This table serves as the foundation for downstream analyses. Each ASV is then clas­sied taxonomically by aligning its representative sequence to a reference database such as SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database (SILVA) (Quast et al., 2013) or Greengenes (DeSantis et al., 2006), depending on the targeted marker gene. This classication allows researchers to map each ASV to a known microbial lineage, enabling taxonomic composition analysis across different samples. QIIME 2 provides robust visualization tools that facilitate the inspection of quality plots, taxonomic bar charts, and diversity metrics.
Diversity analysis in QIIME 2 includes both alpha diversity, which assesses the richness and evenness of microbial communities within a sample, and beta diversity, which compares microbial communities between samples. These analyses can be visualized through principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots and statistically compared using tests such as PERMANOVA. QIIME 2 also supports phylogenetic analysis by constructing a rooted tree from ASV sequences, which is often required for certain diversity metrics like Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity or UniFrac distances.
Finally, QIIME 2‘s plugin-based architecture allows for the integration of external tools and the export of results for custom statistical analysis. It supports the use of metadata for grouping samples by experimental conditions, which is essential for identifying microbial shifts associated with dis­eases, treatments, or environmental factors. All analyses performed within QIIME 2 are tracked in a provenance system that ensures reproducibility, allowing researchers to trace each output back to its inputs and parameters. This transparency, combined with its broad community support and extensibility, makes QIIME 2 an essential tool for amplicon-based metagenomic analysis in micro­biome research, including studies on autoimmune diseases.
A powerful and extensible microbiome bioinformatics platform, QIIME 2 supports end-to-end processing, beginning with importing raw sequencing data in FASTQ format. The rst crucial step involves demultiplexing and quality control, where reads are ltered, trimmed, and denoised. The DADA2 plugin in QIIME 2 models sequencing error proles to recover accurate microbial sequences, referred to as ASVs, improving taxonomic resolution. These ASVs are then assigned taxonomy using trained classiers and reference databases such as SILVA or Greengenes. Once tax­onomic proles are established, QIIME 2 offers a wide range of analytical and visualization tools to evaluate alpha diversity (within-sample diversity), beta diversity (between-sample dissimilarity), and differential abundance of microbial taxa across groups (Figure 9.1).
FIGURE 9.1 Amplicon-based metagenomics data analysis workow.
289 Roles of Bacteria in Autoimmune Diseases
In the context of autoimmune disease research, QIIME 2 has been instrumental in revealing patterns of microbial dysbiosis and potential microbial triggers. The reproducibility and modular­ity of QIIME 2 make it particularly suited for multi-site studies and longitudinal monitoring of microbiome changes in response to treatment, such as dietary interventions or immunosuppressive therapies. Additionally, its integration with plugins for phylogenetic analysis, machine learning, and statistical modeling allows researchers to link microbial signatures with clinical phenotypes and immune proles. Through its transparency, community support, and robust documentation, QIIME 2 continues to be a central tool in advancing our understanding of how microbial communities shape the immunological landscape in autoimmune disorders.
9.3.1.1 Software Installation for Amplicon Metagenomics
To run this pipeline successfully, several software packages and dependencies must be installed and properly congured. The primary requirement is QIIME 2, a powerful platform for microbi­ome analysis that provides the core functionality used throughout the pipeline. QIIME 2 should be installed within a compatible Conda environment to ensure all dependencies are satised and version conicts are avoided. It is essential to use a QIIME 2 release that matches the version of the pre-trained taxonomy classier (such as SILVA), as mismatched versions can result in compat­ibility errors during taxonomy assignment. In addition to QIIME 2, the environment must include Python 3 (typically version 3.8 or 3.10, depending on the QIIME 2 release), and Conda itself should be installed as either Miniconda or Anaconda. The pipeline relies on QIIME 2 plugins like dada2, demux, feature-table, phylogeny, diversity, composition, taxa, emperor, and metadata, which are bundled with standard QIIME 2 distributions but must be properly activated via the environment. The system should also have the Bash shell available for command execution, as subprocess calls depend on a UNIX-like shell environment. Optional tools like wget or curl may be useful for downloading external les, including classiers and example datasets. Furthermore, a reasonably powerful machine is required for practical execu­tion, especially for large datasets; multi-core CPUs, at least 16 GB of RAM, and several tens of gigabytes of free disk space are recommended to ensure smooth performance during denoising,
290 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
phylogenetic tree construction, and diversity analyses. The script assumes a typical directory structure and requires standard read/write le system access, so permissions must be congured accordingly.
9.3.1.2 Acquiring Raw Data
For demonstration purposes, we will use NCBI BioProject PRJNA321051, which encompasses a comprehensive study investigating the alterations in the human gut microbiome associated with MS. Conducted by researchers at Baylor College of Medicine, the study involved sequencing the 16S rRNA gene from stool samples of MS patients and healthy controls using both Roche 454 GS FLX+ and Illumina MiSeq platforms. The sequencing data are publicly available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA321051. For this analysis, we selected ten healthy samples and ten MS samples, and we will apply an amplicon-based metagenomics pipeline to explore the microbial proles in these groups (Table 9.1).
To download FASTQ les from the NCBI SRA database, save the following Bash script to a le named d ata/r aw/dow nlo a d _ fastq.sh:
#!/bin/bash # Check if input file is provided if [ "$#" -ne 1 ]; then
echo "Usage: $0 sra_ids.txt"
exit 1 fi input_file="$1" # Check if fastq-dump is available if ! command -v fastq-dump &> /dev/null; then
echo "Error: fastq-dump is not installed or not in PATH."
exit 1 fi # Download paired-end FASTQ files while IFS= read -r sra_id; do
if [ -n "$sra_id" ]; then
echo "Downloading $sra_id..." fastq-dump --split-files "$sra_id"
fi done < "$input_file" echo "Download completed."
TABLE 9.1 The Selected Samples from NCBI BioProject PRJNA321051
# Sample ID Condition # Sample ID Condition
1 SRR3501908 Healthy 11 SRR3501917 Sclerosis 2 SRR3501909 Healthy 12 SRR3501918 Sclerosis 3 SRR3501910 Healthy 13 SRR3501919 Sclerosis 4 SRR3501911 Healthy 14 SRR3501920 Sclerosis 5 SRR3501912 Healthy 15 SRR3501921 Sclerosis 6 SRR3501913 Healthy 16 SRR3501922 Sclerosis 7 SRR3501914 Healthy 17 SRR3501923 Sclerosis 8 SRR3501915 Healthy 18 SRR3501924 Sclerosis 9 SRR3501916 Healthy 19 SRR3501926 Sclerosis
10 SRR3501925 Healthy 20 SRR3501927 Sclerosis
291 Roles of Bacteria in Autoimmune Diseases
This Bash script is designed to automate the download of paired-end FASTQ les from the NCBI SRA using a list of SRA accession identiers (IDs) provided in a text le. When executed, the script expects exactly one argument: the name of a text le containing SRA IDs, one per line. It begins by checking whether this input argument has been provided. If not, it outputs a usage message to inform the user of the correct command format and then exits with an error code, halting further execution.
Once the input le is conrmed, the script veries that the fastq-dump utility (part of the SRA Toolkit) is installed and accessible through the system’s PATH. If fastq-dump is not available, the script noties the user and exits to prevent runtime errors from occurring due to the missing tool.
The core logic of the script is a loop that reads each line from the provided input le. Each line is assumed to contain a single SRA accession ID. For every non-empty line, the script prints a mes­sage indicating which SRA ID is currently being processed, then uses the fastq-dump command with the --split-files option to download the corresponding paired-end FASTQ les. This option ensures that the forward and reverse reads are saved separately for downstream bioinformat­ics analysis. After all SRA IDs have been processed, the script prints a nal message indicating that the download operation is complete.
Save the SRA run IDs in a text le located at d ata/r aw/sra _ id s.txt, making sure that each ID is on a separate line. Once the le is ready, navigate to the data/r aw directory and run the Bash script using the following command in your terminal:
bash download_fastq.sh sra_ids.txt
Be aware that FASTQ les are typically large, and downloading them may take a considerable amount of time depending on your internet speed and available system memory. Also, make sure you have sufcient storage space before beginning the download. Once all les have been down­loaded, you can compress the FASTQ les using the following command:
gzip *.fastq
9.3.1.3 The Pipeline Inputs
The pipeline program requires specic inputs that must be provided in the correct format; other­wise, it will not complete successfully. These inputs include the following:
9.3.1.3.1 Manifest File
The program is designed to process amplicon-based metagenomic sequencing data using QIIME 2, and it relies on a few essential input les and directories. The most important input is the mani- fest le located at meta/manifest.csv. This TSV le denes the locations of the paired-end FASTQ les for each sample, mapping sample IDs to the corresponding le paths. It follows the PairedEndFastqManifestPhred33V2 format, which is required by QIIME 2 to correctly recognize and import paired-end sequencing data. The quality encoding used in the FASTQ les must also conform to Phred33, which is standard for most modern Illumina datasets. You can use the Python script “create _ ma nifest.py ” to create the manifest le:
import os import glob raw_dir = os.path.abspath("data/raw") manifest_file = "meta/manifest.tsv" samples = {} for f in sorted(glob.glob(os.path.join(raw_dir, "*.fastq.gz"))):
basename = os.path.basename(f) if "_1.fastq.gz" in basename:
sample_id = basename.replace("_1.fastq.gz", "")
292 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
samples.setdefault(sample_id, {})["forward"] = f
elif "_2.fastq.gz" in basename:
sample_id = basename.replace("_2.fastq.gz", "")
samples.setdefault(sample_id, {})["reverse"] = f os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(manifest_file), exist_ok=True) with open(manifest_file, "w") as out:
out.write(
"sample-id\tforward-absolute-filepath\treverse-absolute-filepath\n" )
for sample, paths in samples.items():
if "forward" in paths and "reverse" in paths:
out.write(f"{sample}\t{paths['forward']}\t{paths['reverse']}\n")
else:
print(f"Skipping {sample}: missing forward or reverse read.")
print(f"Manifest saved to: {manifest_file}")
The manifest le is structured as follows:
sample-id forward-absolute-filepath reverse-absolute-filepath SRR12714143 abs_path/SRR12714143_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714143_2.fastq.gz SRR12714147 abs_path/SRR12714147_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714147_2.fastq.gz SRR12714128 abs_path/SRR12714128_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714128_2.fastq.gz SRR12714131 abs_path/SRR12714131_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714131_2.fastq.gz SRR12714132 abs_path/SRR12714132_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714132_2.fastq.gz SRR12714136 abs_path/SRR12714136_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714136_2.fastq.gz SRR12714139 abs_path/SRR12714139_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714139_2.fastq.gz SRR12714140 abs_path/SRR12714140_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714140_2.fastq.gz SRR12714141 abs_path/SRR12714141_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714141_2.fastq.gz SRR12714142 abs_path/SRR12714142_1.fastq.gz abs_path/SRR12714142_2.fastq.gz
9.3.1.3.2 Metadata File
Another key input is the metadata le found at meta/metadata.tsv. This tab-separated le contains sample-specic metadata, including experimental groupings such as treatment or con­trol conditions. The metadata is critical for many downstream analyses, including diversity group signicance testing and differential abundance analysis. The metadata le must follow QIIME 2‘s formatting conventions, with a header row and sample IDs matching those dened in the manifest le. The metadata le is structured as follows:
#SampleID condition SRR3501908 healthy SRR3501909 healthy SRR3501910 healthy SRR3501911 healthy SRR3501912 healthy SRR3501913 healthy SRR3501914 healthy SRR3501915 healthy SRR3501916 healthy SRR3501925 healthy SRR3501917 sclerosis SRR3501918 sclerosis SRR3501919 sclerosis SRR3501920 sclerosis
293 Roles of Bacteria in Autoimmune Diseases
SRR3501921 sclerosis SRR3501922 sclerosis SRR3501923 sclerosis SRR3501924 sclerosis SRR3501926 sclerosis SRR3501927 sclerosis
9.3.1.3.3 Pre-Trained Classier
Additionally, the program expects a pre-trained Naive Bayes classier in the form of a QIIME 2 artifact. You can download a pre-trained classier from https://resources.qiime2.org/ or train your own classier by following the QIIME 2 documentation. This classier is used to assign taxonomy to the representative sequences derived from the denoising process. It must be trained on a compat­ible set of sequences and primers that match the target region of the input amplicon data. You can download the SILVA 138 99% pre-trained Naive Bayes classier for QIIME 2 directly from the ofcial QIIME 2 data repository. However, the classier must be trained using the same version of scikit-learn that is installed on your machine.
9.3.1.3.4 FASTQ Files
The FASTQ, downloaded in a previous step, referenced in the manifest, the sample metadata, and the classier artifact collectively serve as the core inputs required to run the pipeline. These les need to be present and correctly formatted for the analysis to proceed without errors. All output generated by the program is stored in the results directory, which is automatically created if it does not already exist.
The directory tree structure, including input les and scripts, is shown in Figure 9.2.
9.3.1.4 QIIME 2 Artifacts and Visualizations
In QIIME 2, artifacts and visualizations are central components of the data analysis framework, each serving a distinct but complementary role. Artifacts, represented by les with the .q z a exten- sion, are data containers that store raw or processed data along with essential metadata and prov­enance information. These artifacts are not simple les but rather structured archives that include the data, a record of how it was generated, and the software environment used, ensuring full trace­ability and reproducibility. For example, an imported sequence dataset, a denoised feature table, or a phylogenetic tree are all stored as artifacts, encapsulating the actual data output of various pipeline stages.
In contrast, visualizations are represented by les with the .qz v extension and are designed specically to present results to the user in a human-readable, interactive form. These visualizations include tables, summaries, plots, and statistics generated from artifacts. Unlike artifacts, which are primarily intended for computational use in downstream steps, visualizations are meant for inter­pretation, inspection, and decision-making. For instance, after generating a feature table artifact, one might create a corresponding visualization to explore sequencing depth per sample, which assists in determining whether to lter out low-abundance samples.
The key distinction between artifacts and visualizations lies in their purpose and usage. Artifacts are data carriers that can be passed into other QIIME 2 commands, acting as inputs for further processing. Visualizations, however, are terminal products of analysis steps and cannot be reused as inputs for other commands. They are instead opened using the QIIME 2 viewer or within a QIIME2 environment to facilitate data exploration and result validation. This separation enforces clarity in workow structure: artifacts build the computational history, while visualizations support the interpretative process.