Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5529_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
264 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
Entrez Programming Utilities (E-utilities) via Biopython to identify publicly available ATAC-Seq datasets related to systemic lupus in humans. It runs a predened query that targets BioProjects associated with the SRA while excluding those under controlled access in dbGaP. Users can easily modify the script to search for other autoimmune or disease-related datasets by replacing the dis­ease name in the query string. After executing the search, the script retrieves the unique BioProject identiers (IDs), fetches summary metadata, and prints the corresponding BioProject accession numbers, which can then be used to locate and download the raw sequencing data for further analysis.
For demonstrating ATAC-Seq data analysis, we will use publicly available raw data from the NCBI SRA database, specically from BioProject PRJNA1139785, which is linked to GEO Series GSE273008. This dataset features ATAC-Seq proling of CD4+ T cell subsets, comparing high CD38 and low CD38 populations, from both healthy individuals and patients with SLE. The study includes a total of 12 biological samples, with triplicates for each cell type drawn from three healthy donors and three SLE patients. Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NextSeq 500 plat­form. The corresponding raw FASTQ les are available through the SRA Run Selector on the GEO page, making this dataset a valuable resource for practicing ATAC-Seq data processing and analysis workows.
Table 8.1 presents the metadata, including the NCBI SRA run IDs, the sample condition (SLE or
healthy), and the CD38 expression level of the CD4+ T cells. This table also reects the overall study design, which will guide the structure of the downstream analysis. To download the FASTQ les for each sample, rst copy the SRA run IDs into a plain text le named i d s _ AT AC.t x t , with one ID per line. Then, use the download _ fastq.py Python script (provided as supplementary material) to download the corresponding FASTQ les into a directory named raw. After the les are downloaded, you can compress them using the command gzip * to convert all FASTQ les into .fa st q.gz format for efcient storage and processing.
8.6.2 ATAC-SEQ PIPELINE
The ATAC-Seq pipeline, implemented in the script provided as supplementary material, comprises a series of modular functions; each designed to perform a specic and essential step in the processing
TABLE 8.1 The Metadata of the ATAC-Seq Raw Data
SRARUNID Condition CD38
SRR29979670 SLE Low SRR29979671 SLE High SRR29979672 SLE Low SRR29979673 SLE High SRR29979674 SLE Low SRR29979675 SLE High SRR29979676 HC Low SRR29979677 HC High SRR29979678 HC Low SRR29979679 HC High SRR29979680 HC Low SRR29979681 HC High
Source: Adapted from BioProject PRJNA1139785 Metadata (NCBI SRA).
265 ATAC-Seq for Autoimmune Diseases
and analysis of chromatin accessibility data. The following paragraphs provide a detailed descrip­tion of each function and its role within the overall workow.
The function is responsible for preparing the reference genome needed for accurate alignment of ATAC-Seq reads. It begins by checking for the presence of the hg38 genome in a local refer­ence directory. If the genome is not found, the function downloads the compressed FASTA le from the UCSC Genome Browser, decompresses it, and generates index les required for both and bowtie2. The command creates a FASTA index (.fai) le used for rapid sequence lookup, while producing a set of index les that enable efcient alignment of reads. This ensures that the genome is fully ready for downstream alignment tasks and eliminates the need for manual preparation by the user.
The function handles the preprocessing of raw sequencing data by removing sequencing adapters and low-quality bases from each read. It uses the tool, which is optimized for speed and accuracy, to automatically detect and trim adapter sequences while preserving high-quality portions of the read. Trimming is essential in ATAC-Seq because transposase activity often introduces adapters close to the ends of short DNA fragments. Retaining these artifacts can negatively impact mapping quality and interfere with peak calling. The function reads the compressed FASTQ le for a given sample, processes it, and writes a new high-quality FASTQ le to the trimmed directory, ready for alignment.
The function takes the trimmed reads and aligns them to the reference genome using bow- tie2, a widely used aligner that efciently handles short DNA sequences. The function constructs a shell pipeline that pipes the aligned reads directly into samtools, which converts them from Sequence Alignment/Map (SAM) to BAM format and performs sorting. Sorting ensures that the resulting BAM les are organized by genomic coordinate, which is necessary for indexing and later peak calling. The resulting BAM les are saved in the aligned directory and represent the locations of accessible chromatin in the genome, as inferred from the insertion sites of the ATAC transposase.
The function renes the aligned data by removing reads that align to mitochondrial DNA, which can represent a substantial portion of ATAC-Seq reads but do not contribute useful information about nuclear chromatin accessibility. It uses samtools to extract only those reads that align to nuclear chromosomes and then sorts and saves the ltered data in new BAM les. This function also creates BAM index les using samtools index, which are required for efcient data loading in genome browsers and downstream analysis tools. Filtering at this stage improves the signal-to-noise ratio in the data and ensures that peak calling focuses on relevant genomic regions.
The function uses MACS2 to detect regions of statistically signicant chromatin accessibil­ity from the ltered BAM les. It treats the aligned fragments as signal tracks and scans the genome for enrichments that exceed the expected background noise. These enrichments are inter­preted as open chromatin regions where TFs or regulatory elements may bind. MACS2 is run with parameters optimized for ATAC-Seq, including --nomodel, --shift, and to accommodate the unique transposase insertion patterns. The output includes les, which contain genomic coor­dinates of peaks, their signicance scores, and additional metadata. These peak les are stored in the peaks directory and can be visualized or used in downstream motif analysis or chromatin state modeling.
The function serves as the orchestrator of the entire ATAC-Seq workow. It begins by calling to ensure the genome is available and indexed, then iterates over each sample listed in the metadata le. For each sample, it sequentially executes the trimming, alignment, ltering, and peak calling functions, using metadata elds such as SRARUNID and condition to name les and organize results. This function coordinates the data ow and ensures consistent and reproducible processing of all samples in the dataset. The nal result of the pipeline is a well-structured set of les for each sample, including trimmed FASTQ les, aligned BAM les, and MACS2 peak les, which together provide a high-resolution map of chromatin accessibility suitable for exploratory analysis, visualiza­tion, or integrative epigenomic studies.
266 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
8.6.3 ATAC-SEQ PEAK ANNOTATION
We will follow a similar approach to annotate ChIP-Seq peaks using HOMER. For instructions on installing HOMER and obtaining the necessary genome annotation les, please refer to the previ­ous chapter. Ensure that the HOMER directories are included in your system’s PATH by adding the following line to your le:
PATH="path_to_homer/homer:$PATH" PATH="path_to_homer/homer/bin:$PATH"
To download the genome annotation for the human genome (hg38), navigate to the directory containing and run the following command:
perl configureHomer.pl -install hg38
This will install the annotation les required by HOMER for accurate peak annotation.
The annotation program “atac _ peak _ annotation.py” for ATAC-Seq peak les is designed to integrate the outputs of the ATAC-Seq processing pipeline with HOMER’s powerful genomic annotation capabilities. The program begins by reading the metadata le, which contains essential information for identifying each sample, including its unique SRA run ID and experi­mental condition (e.g., SLE or healthy). This metadata is used to guide the annotation process by determining the correct le paths for each peak le that was generated during MACS2 peak calling. The script systematically constructs the expected location of each le within the directory based on the sample’s ID and condition, ensuring that only samples with existing peak les are processed.
The core function of the script, annotate _ peaks, wraps around the HOMER tool anno- tate Pea k s.pl, which is widely used for assigning functional annotations to genomic regions. For each sample, it builds a command that calls a n not ateP eak s.pl, specifying the MACS2 peak le as input and the genome build (hg38) as the annotation reference. HOMER uses precompiled genomic annotation databases to determine the location of each peak relative to known genomic features, including TSSs, exons, introns, untranslated regions, and intergenic regions. It also iden­ties the nearest gene to each peak and provides the distance to its TSS. This functional context allows researchers to better interpret which regulatory regions are likely to be involved in gene regulation, especially in the context of autoimmune diseases or immune cell differentiation.
The output of the annotation function is saved in a dedicated directory, with one annotated le generated per sample. These les are plain text and contain rich information for each peak, including genomic coordinates, feature annotation, associated genes, and proximity to regulatory landmarks. The script ensures that these outputs are consistently named using the sample ID, mak­ing it easy to cross-reference results across the pipeline. If a peak le is missing or not found in its expected location, the script gracefully skips that sample and continues processing the rest.
The run _ annotation function acts as the orchestrator, looping through every sample in the metadata and calling the annotation function for each. This design enables automated, high­throughput annotation of ATAC-Seq peak les across dozens or hundreds of samples. Because it leverages HOMER’s built-in genome annotation databases, the program assumes that the appro­priate genome (such as hg38) has been installed using HOMER’s conguration tools. The result is a scalable and reproducible annotation workow that adds critical biological meaning to the ATAC-Seq peaks, preparing the data for downstream analysis such as differential accessibility, motif enrichment, or integration with gene expression datasets.
Each column in the ATAC-Seq annotation output table contributes a distinct layer of biologi­cal context, and when interpreted collectively, these features can uncover critical insights into the regulatory architecture that underlies autoimmune diseases. The annotation output les generated using HOMER are included as supplementary materials. The following section provides an in-depth
267 ATAC-Seq for Autoimmune Diseases
explanation of each annotation column and its biological relevance. The eld descriptions have been adapted and expanded based on output formats generated by HOMER (Heinz et al., 2010).
PeakID serves as a unique ID for each detected open chromatin region. It allows researchers to reference, track, and cross-link specic peaks across different analysis stages, including visualiza­tion, motif analysis, and correlation with gene expression.
Chr, Start, and End dene the genomic coordinates of the accessible chromatin region. These locations are essential for mapping peaks to nearby genes and regulatory elements. In autoimmune diseases, peaks near immune-related loci, such as cytokine receptors or TFs, can point to dysregu­lated enhancers or promoters.
Strand indicates the DNA strand orientation of the peak region. While ATAC-Seq is gener­ally strand-agnostic in accessibility analysis, strand information becomes relevant when overlap­ping peaks with annotated transcripts, especially in genes with antisense or bidirectional promoters potentially involved in immune cell regulation.
Peak Score reects the statistical condence or enrichment level of the peak, typically derived from MACS2 peak calling. High scores indicate strong accessibility signals, which often corre­spond to functionally active regulatory regions. In the context of autoimmunity, high-scoring peaks within immune cell-specic enhancers can signal hyperactive chromatin states contributing to aberrant gene expression.
Focus Ratio/Region Size quanties the sharpness or focality of the accessibility signal. A high ratio suggests a narrowly dened, potentially TF-bound region, whereas broader regions may rep­resent nucleosome-depleted zones or chromatin remodeling. Sharp peaks near genes like FOXP3, IL2RA, or STAT3 may indicate altered TF binding, providing mechanistic insight into immune dysregulation.
Annotation describes the general genomic feature the peak overlaps, such as “Promoter”, Exon”, “Intron”, or “Distal Intergenic”. This contextual information helps prioritize peaks likely to inuence gene regulation. For example, promoter-associated peaks in CTLA4 or BACH2 could affect gene expression patterns in T cells or B cells, potentially impairing immune tolerance.
Detailed Annotation offers a more granular description, specifying the relative position (e.g., “Promoter (−50bp)” or “Exon 3 of 8”) and can identify exactly where within the gene structure the chromatin is open. This can be crucial in autoimmune contexts, where alternative promoters or enhancer switching may lead to pathogenic isoforms or misregulated transcription.
Distance to TSS reports the distance from the peak center to the TSS of the nearest gene. Negative values indicate upstream promoter regions; positive values indicate downstream regions. In autoim­munity, peaks near key regulatory genes (e.g., within 1 kb upstream of IL2RA or STAT1) can reveal enhancer–promoter loops or disrupted regulatory architecture driving immune overactivation.
Nearest PromoterID links the peak to a known promoter element, providing a direct mapping between chromatin accessibility and transcriptional control regions. This is particularly useful for associating disease-specic peaks with their regulatory context, especially in promoter switching events observed in SLE or RA.
Entrez ID, Nearest Unigene, Nearest Refseq, and Nearest Ensembl provide standardized gene IDs across databases. These are critical for integrating ATAC-Seq data with external resources like gene expression datasets, GWAS hits, or pathway enrichment tools. For example, if a peak near TNFAIP3 overlaps with a lupus-associated SNP, its Ensembl ID can facilitate downstream quantita­tive trait loci (eQTL) or chromatin interaction studies.
Gene Name and Gene Alias provide the common and alternate names of the gene nearest to the peak. These IDs help quickly recognize immunologically relevant genes. Genes like FOXP3, STAT3, GATA3, or CD38 are well-known regulators of T-cell differentiation, signaling pathways, or autoimmunity, and accessibility changes near these genes may reveal epigenetic dysregulation contributing to disease.
Gene Description offers a brief functional summary, which is helpful for researchers unfamil­iar with all gene functions. In autoimmune diseases, descriptions such as “Interferon regulatory
268 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
factor” (IRF) or “Tumor necrosis factor receptor” immediately ag pathways involving immune signaling, inammation, or T-cell exhaustion.
Gene Type indicates whether the gene is protein-coding, non-coding RNA, or pseudogene. This distinction is important because many autoimmune-associated variants occur in non-coding regions. ATAC-Seq peaks near lncRNAs or enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) may point to regulatory lay­ers beyond coding gene expression, reecting the complexity of immune gene regulation in disease.
Together, HOMER annotation table for ATAC-Seq peaks allows researchers to not only identify where chromatin is accessible but also interpret how such accessibility maps to genes, regulatory elements, and immune functions. In autoimmune diseases, integrating this annotation with differen­tial peak analysis, RNA-Seq, and GWAS results can uncover causal regulatory variants, epigeneti­cally misregulated genes, and new therapeutic targets.
8.6.4 ATAC-SEQ PEAK VISUALIZATION
Once the ATAC-Seq data has been processed, peaks called using MACS2, and genomic features annotated with HOMER, the next essential step is visualization. Visualization serves not only as a validation tool but also as a way to explore the biological signicance of chromatin accessibility in different cell types and disease states. In the context of autoimmune diseases, where subtle regula­tory changes can drive immune misactivation, visualizing ATAC-Seq data helps reveal patterns of open chromatin that are otherwise hidden in raw peak les or summary tables. These visual explo­rations can expose gene regulatory mechanisms, suggest potential disease-associated enhancers, and help correlate chromatin structure with gene expression patterns.
A primary approach to visualizing ATAC-Seq data is through genome browsers, such as the IGV and the UCSC Genome Browser. These platforms provide interactive environments where researchers can examine read alignments, peak calls, and annotations in the context of the genome. To do this effectively, the ltered and sorted BAM les from the alignment step are loaded into the browser alongside their Binary Alignment Index (BAI) les. These les display the depth and distribution of reads across the genome, allowing for an intuitive view of chromatin accessibility. In IGV, for example, a sharp peak over the promoter of the IL2RA gene in SLE samples (but not in healthy controls) can signal disease-specic promoter activation. When viewed in conjunction with the MACS2 .narrowPeak le, which highlights statistically signicant accessible regions, such observations become more robust and interpretable.
To improve performance and compatibility with large datasets, BAM les can be converted into coverage tracks in the BigWig format. Tools such as deepTools’ bamCoverage or the UCSC utility bedGraphToBigWig allow for the generation of normalized read density tracks across the genome. BigWig les can then be loaded into IGV or UCSC, providing an efcient way to compare multiple samples. In autoimmune disease studies, loading BigWig tracks from different CD4+ T cell subsets, such as high CD38 and low CD38, can reveal accessibility differences at loci like STAT1, FOXP3, or TNFAIP3, which are known to regulate T-cell function and immune tolerance. These differences may represent epigenetic signatures of immune activation, exhaustion, or dysregulation that are not evident from gene expression data alone.
Beyond genome browsers, quantitative visualization of ATAC-Seq data across many genomic regions provides higher-level summaries of regulatory dynamics. Using tools like deepTools, researchers can create heatmaps and average prole plots centered around dened genomic features such as TSSs, enhancers, or even specic sets of differentially expressed genes. For example, a heatmap of ATAC-Seq signal intensities centered on the TSS of interferon-stimulated genes may show uniformly high accessibility in SLE samples, reecting a global activation of the interferon response pathway (a hallmark of lupus pathogenesis). Similarly, when autoimmune-associated SNPs identied by GWAS are mapped onto ATAC-Seq peaks, one can generate plots that reveal whether these SNPs lie in accessible chromatin in immune cells, thus suggesting functional non-coding regulatory variants.
269 ATAC-Seq for Autoimmune Diseases
Incorporating motif enrichment and footprinting analysis into visualization can further enhance interpretation. With tools like HOMER as shown in the previous chapter, TF binding motifs enriched within peak regions can be identied and visualized alongside accessibility data. For instance, in RA samples, increased accessibility in distal enhancer regions may coincide with motifs for IRF5 or T-bet, suggesting these TFs are active in shaping inammatory gene programs. Visualizing footprint scores along with ATAC-Seq signal can also identify precise binding sites and their dif­ferential usage across conditions. This is particularly useful for understanding how transcriptional regulators control immune cell phenotypes and how these controls are altered in autoimmunity.
Another powerful approach involves integrating ATAC-Seq data with RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, or Hi-C datasets to create multi-modal genome browser sessions or co-visualized plots. For instance, chromatin accessibility at the CTLA4 promoter can be visualized alongside its expression levels in CD4+ T cells from both patients and controls. If chromatin is more open and the gene is upregulated in patient samples, it suggests a direct regulatory effect. These integrative visualizations not only enhance interpretability but also allow researchers to formulate mechanistic hypotheses about how gene regulation is disrupted in disease.
In autoimmune disease research, the ability to visualize chromatin accessibility offers a window into the regulatory circuitry that governs immune cell behavior. Chromatin changes in regulatory T cells (Tregs), memory T cells, or B cells can now be directly observed at high resolution, high­lighting disease-specic regulatory states. Visualization reveals which regions of the genome are primed for transcription, how that priming differs between healthy and diseased tissues, and which genes are potentially dysregulated as a result. It transforms abstract peaks into interpretable regu­latory elements, enabling researchers to move from data to insight, from regions to functions, and ultimately, from mechanisms to therapeutic targets.
8.6.5 NUCLEOSOME POSITIONING, TF FOOTPRINTING, DIFFERENTIAL ACCESSIBILITY, AND MOTIFS
One of the unique strengths of ATAC-Seq is its ability to capture not only regions of open chro­matin but also the ne-scale architecture of nucleosomes and TF occupancy. Unlike methods that require cross-linking or immunoprecipitation, ATAC-Seq preserves the native chromatin landscape through enzymatic cleavage by the Tn5 transposase, which preferentially inserts sequencing adapt­ers into accessible regions of DNA. This enzymatic activity leaves behind a telltale pattern in the sequencing data that can be leveraged to infer both nucleosome positioning and TF footprinting, offering a detailed view of chromatin organization and gene regulation.
Nucleosome positioning refers to the identication of the precise locations along the genome where nucleosomes (DNA–histone complexes that organize and compact DNA) are situated. Because nucleosomes physically occlude DNA from binding proteins, their placement plays a criti­cal role in determining gene accessibility and regulation. In ATAC-Seq, nucleosome positioning can be inferred from the fragment length distribution of sequencing reads. When aligned and plotted by insert size, three characteristic fragment populations often emerge: short fragments (typically less than 100 bp) arise from NFRs, intermediate fragments (~200 bp) correspond to mono-nucleosomes, and longer fragments (~400–600 bp) reect the presence of di- and tri-nucleosomes. These pat­terns are not random but instead reect the regular spacing of nucleosomes around active regula­tory elements. For instance, at TSSs, one often observes a nucleosome-depleted region anked by well-positioned nucleosomes forming a phased, symmetric arrangement. This reects the biological requirement for TFs and RNA polymerase to access open DNA, while adjacent nucleosomes delin­eate regulatory boundaries. Computational tools such as TOBIAS, which correct for Tn5 insertion bias and extract fragment-length signal patterns, can model these distributions to generate high­resolution nucleosome maps and visualize how chromatin structure shifts in response to cellular states or disease conditions.
In autoimmune diseases, where gene regulation is frequently altered not by mutations but by epi­genetic mechanisms, nucleosome positioning maps offer insight into immune cell reprogramming.
270 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
For example, in SLE, nucleosome repositioning around interferon response elements may reect sustained transcriptional activation of proinammatory genes. Similarly, in diseases like RA or MS, altered nucleosome phasing near immune checkpoints or transcriptional repressors such as FOXP3 and BACH2 can indicate disruptions in gene silencing mechanisms, contributing to the breakdown of immune tolerance. These positional changes provide a complementary layer of information to peak-based analyses, highlighting how the physical packaging of chromatin inuences gene acces­sibility and activity.
TF footprinting extends the analytical resolution of ATAC-Seq even further by identifying specic DNA regions within open chromatin that are protected from Tn5 insertion due to the binding of regulatory proteins, most notably TFs. When a TF binds to its DNA motif, it shields a short segment (typically 6–25 bp) from enzymatic cleavage. This leaves a characteristic local depletion of sequencing reads or “footprint”, anked by areas of increased insertion activity. These patterns can be computationally detected and interpreted using tools such as TOBIAS, HI NT-ATAC, or PIQ (Protein interaction quantitation), which correct for enzymatic bias and align footprints to known DNA motifs, thereby inferring both TF presence and activity even in the absence of prior ChIP-Seq data. In autoimmune contexts, TF footprinting is particularly powerful for identifying which regulatory networks are dysregulated in disease-relevant immune cells. For instance, CD4+ T cells from lupus patients often show increased footprints for IRF5, T-bet, and STAT1, reecting chronic activation of interferon signaling pathways. Conversely, the loss of footprints for transcriptional repressors such as FOXP3 or GATA3 in regulatory T cells may signal the erosion of immune suppression and tolerance. These footprinting patterns help decode the cell-specic regulatory logic that governs immune responses and reveal which TFs may be driving disease pathology. They can also distinguish between immune cell subtypes (such as regulatory, effector, memory, or exhausted T cells) based on their unique chromatin and TF activity proles.
Together, nucleosome positioning and TF footprinting transform ATAC-Seq data into a multidi­mensional chromatin map. This goes beyond simply identifying open DNA regions to uncover the organizational and regulatory forces shaping the genome in each cell type. In autoimmune diseases, where cellular identity and function are often perturbed through epigenetic reprogramming rather than coding mutations, these high-resolution analyses provide crucial insight into the molecular mechanisms driving immune dysregulation. By exposing the interplay between chromatin structure and transcriptional control, they also offer a roadmap for identifying candidate biomarkers, thera­peutic targets, and regulators of immune homeostasis.
The Python program, provided as supplementary material, implements a complete and modular workow for analyzing ATAC-Seq data using the TOBIAS suite, with a specic focus on under­standing chromatin accessibility, TF binding activity, and regulatory differences in the context of immune-related diseases such as SLE. The pipeline begins by reading a metadata le that contains information about individual sequencing samples, including their sample IDs and associated exper­imental conditions. It then sequentially performs Tn5 bias correction, TF footprinting analysis, and differential binding detection. The program is designed to generate and organize all outputs within a structured directory, enabling efcient reuse of intermediate and nal data les for downstream visualization or statistical interpretation.
The input to the pipeline program consists of several key les and directories that provide both experimental data and reference resources required for the ATAC-Seq analysis. First and fore­most, it requires a metadata le in comma-separated values (CSV) format (meta/metadata. csv), which contains a list of sample IDs (SRARUNID) and corresponding biological conditions, such as disease status (e.g., “SLE” or “healthy”) and CD38 expression levels. This metadata is essential for guiding sample-specic processing and for grouping samples in the differential bind­ing analysis. The program also expects aligned BAM les for each sample, named in the format {sample _ id} _ filtered.bam, stored in the directory. These BAM les are preprocessed ATAC-Seq alignments, ltered and ready for downstream analysis.
271 ATAC-Seq for Autoimmune Diseases
In addition to sample data, the program requires a reference genome in FASTA format (refer­en ce/h g38.fa) to guide the bias correction and footprinting steps. A merged peak le (data/ peaks/merged _ peaks.bed), which consolidates accessible regions across all samples, is
also required for focusing the footprinting analysis on biologically meaningful regions (use Python program to create merged _ peaks.bed). Furthermore, the pipeline uses a motif database in MEME format (motifs/jaspar.meme) containing known TF binding motifs, which are used during the differential binding inference to identify enriched regulators (use to download and prepare jaspar.meme or visit https://jaspar.elixir.no/downloads/ to download it manually and rename it). All results and intermediate les are written to an output directory (data/tobias/), which the program creates and manages automatically. These inputs together ensure that the pipe­line can operate in a sample-aware, genome-informed, and motif-resolved manner, providing a high-resolution analysis of chromatin regulation in immune-related conditions.
The pipeline begins with the function, which loads the sample metadata from a CSV le into a pandas DataFrame. This table serves as the backbone for guiding all downstream analysis, as it provides the sample IDs required to locate BAM les and to assign each sample to experimental groups, such as “healthy control” or “SLE”. This metadata is also critical for grouping samples in the differential binding analysis later in the workow.
The function is the rst major processing step applied to each sample. It takes a ltered BAM alignment le for each sample and performs Tn5 bias correction using TOBIAS’s ATACorrect com­mand. This correction is essential because the Tn5 transposase enzyme used in ATAC-Seq exhibits sequence preference when cutting DNA, which can skew the apparent accessibility signal. TOBIAS models and corrects this bias by comparing observed insertions to an expected background, output­ting a bigWig le that reects bias-corrected chromatin accessibility. In this script, careful le and path management is implemented to ensure that if TOBIAS creates a directory structure around its outputs, the nal corrected bigWig le is extracted and stored in a predictable location, avoiding potential misreads by downstream commands.
Following correction, the function calculates the TF footprint scores using TOBIAS’s FootprintScores command. This step analyzes the corrected bigWig les alongside the genomic regions specied in a peak le (merged across all samples) and identies ne-grained patterns of protection from transposase cleavage. These patterns (dips in signal within otherwise accessible regions) are indicative of TF occupancy, and the resulting footprint bigWig les contain signal tracks that can be visualized in genome browsers or fed into further statistical analysis.
The function performs one of the most biologically informative steps in the pipeline. It takes the metadata and groups samples by a user-specied variable, either by condition (e.g., SLE versus healthy) or by the level of CD38 expression. It then uses the BINDetect command from TOBIAS to compare footprint signals across these groups. This differential analysis identies TF motifs that are signicantly more or less bound in one group versus another, offering clues about which regula­tory programs are active or dysregulated in disease. BINDetect not only determines the presence or absence of footprints but also leverages motif scanning and footprint depth to infer changes in binding activity across conditions.
The bigWig les produced during the TOBIAS pipeline—specically from the ATACorrect and FootprintScores steps—are essential for interpreting chromatin accessibility and TF binding activ­ity in ATAC-Seq data. These les are dense, compressed binary formats that store continuous signal data across the genome and are optimized for efcient visualization and querying. They provide distinct but complementary layers of information that help reveal both global and local features of chromatin structure and regulatory protein occupancy.
The bigWig le generated by the ATACorrect step, typically named sample _ filtered _ corrected.bw, contains a bias-corrected representation of Tn5 transposase insertions across the genome. Raw ATAC-Seq data is inherently biased due to the sequence preferences of the Tn5 enzyme, which can lead to misleading peaks of accessibility. The ATACorrect module adjusts for this bias by modeling the expected background insertion pattern and correcting the observed
272 Bioinformatics of Autoimmune Diseases
signal accordingly. The result is a cleaner and more accurate signal of true chromatin accessibil­ity. To interpret this le, one typically loads it into a genome browser such as IGV, UCSC Genome Browser, or JBrowse, and views it alongside gene annotations, raw ATAC-Seq reads, or peak calls. This allows researchers to assess whether certain genomic regions, such as promoters, enhancers, or insulators, are accessible in the sample of interest. High corrected signal intensities indicate NFRs that are open to TFs and other regulatory proteins. This corrected signal can also be used for quan­titative comparisons of chromatin accessibility across different conditions or cell types.
The FootprintScores step builds upon the corrected signal to detect regions of localized protection within accessible chromatin, producing a footprint bigWig le (e.g., sample _ fo ot pr i nt s.bw). This le captures ne-scale depletion of insertions, indicative of DNA­bound proteins that occlude the Tn5 transposase from accessing their binding sites. Footprints are typically seen as narrow dips in signal surrounded by higher accessibility, and these patterns are often centered on known or predicted TF binding motifs. Viewing this footprint signal in a genome browser can help identify where specic TFs are actively engaged with DNA. When com­bined with motif annotation les or gene regulatory databases, these footprints can be mapped to known TF motifs, allowing inference of which regulatory proteins are likely active in the sample. Moreover, footprints can be compared across conditions (e.g., healthy versus SLE) to identify dif­ferential TF occupancy.
Together, the corrected bigWig and footprint bigWig les provide a multidimensional view of the chromatin landscape. The former highlights general accessibility, while the latter pinpoints the precise loci where TFs and other DNA-binding proteins are exerting regulatory control. By integrat­ing these les with gene expression data, motif analyses, and disease phenotypes, researchers can uncover epigenetic dysregulation patterns, identify candidate regulatory elements, and determine key TFs that may drive disease mechanisms. This is particularly powerful in immunology and autoimmunity, where gene regulation often changes in the absence of underlying genetic mutations, and where understanding the chromatin context of immune cells can lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.
The output of the BINDetect module from the TOBIAS suite provides one of the most bio­logically insightful layers of ATAC-Seq analysis by integrating motif information with chromatin accessibility and TF occupancy to infer differential binding events. This step goes beyond simply identifying where chromatin is open or where TFs are potentially bound; it evaluates whether the binding of specic TFs changes systematically between experimental conditions, such as between healthy controls and autoimmune disease samples. The output consists of a series of structured les and plots, typically located in a designated results directory (e.g., dat a/tobia s/differ-
ential _ condition), and includes motif scores, log-fold change comparisons, volcano plots, heatmaps, and lists of differentially bound TF motifs.
The core le in the BINDetect output is a table that associates each motif with its predicted binding score across all samples and compares these scores between groups. It estimates the degree to which motifs are more or less protected (i.e., bound) in one condition relative to another by cal­culating differential footprinting scores and associated statistics. These results are interpretable both statistically and biologically. For example, a signicantly higher footprinting score for a motif corresponding to the IRF family in lupus samples compared to controls suggests increased IRF activity in disease, a nding consistent with the known involvement of interferon signaling in SLE. Similarly, loss of footprints for regulatory T cell–associated factors like FOXP3 or GATA3 could indicate disrupted immune suppression mechanisms in autoimmune pathology.
Visualization les such as volcano plots and heatmaps allow for immediate identication of TFs that show the most pronounced differential binding. Volcano plots typically display log2 fold change in binding on the x-axis and statistical signicance on the y-axis, highlighting TFs with strong condition-specic enrichment or depletion. Heatmaps, on the other hand, can cluster samples and motifs based on their footprinting proles, revealing condition-specic binding signatures that may correlate with immune cell states or disease severity.
273 ATAC-Seq for Autoimmune Diseases
These outputs can be leveraged in several powerful ways. First, they guide hypothesis genera­tion by highlighting candidate TFs that are differentially active in disease versus control. These candidates can then be validated using orthogonal methods such as ChIP-Seq or perturbation experiments. Second, BINDetect results can be integrated with RNA-Seq or single-cell expression data to correlate differential binding with gene expression changes. For example, if a TF shows increased binding in SLE samples and its target genes are also upregulated, this supports its role as an upstream regulator of disease-relevant transcriptional programs. Finally, by comparing dif­ferential binding across multiple metadata groups (e.g., high CD38 versus low CD38 T cells or early- versus late-stage disease), researchers can uncover regulatory patterns that mark immune cell activation, exhaustion, or plasticity, key features of autoimmune pathogenesis.
In the context of autoimmune diseases, BINDetect is particularly valuable because it helps elu­cidate the epigenetic and transcriptional dysregulation that underlies immune dysfunction. It identi­es not only which regulatory elements are active but also which TFs are differentially engaged, providing mechanistic insight into disease processes and uncovering potential molecular targets for immunomodulatory therapies. By capturing the dynamic nature of chromatin accessibility and TF binding, BINDetect transforms ATAC-Seq data into actionable biological knowledge.
8.6.6 EMERGING APPLICATIONS AND MULTI-OMICS INTEGRATION
One of the most exciting frontiers in the study of chromatin accessibility and autoimmune diseases lies in the integration of ATAC-Seq with emerging technologies that offer unprecedented reso­lution and functional insights. Among these, scATAC-Seq has revolutionized our understanding of immune cell heterogeneity by enabling the analysis of chromatin accessibility proles at the level of individual cells. This is particularly relevant in autoimmune diseases, where dysregulation often involves subtle shifts in the activation states or subpopulation dynamics of immune cells. For example, in diseases such as lupus or RA, scATAC-Seq can distinguish between naive and memory T cells, exhausted effector populations, or rare pathogenic subtypes that may be masked in bulk analyses. By resolving these differences, scATAC-Seq has shed light on lineage commitment, enhancer activity, and regulatory circuits specic to disease-associated cell states, revealing how chromatin remodeling underpins immune dysfunction at the most granular level.
Building upon this, spatial epigenomics is emerging as a complementary approach that maps chromatin accessibility within the anatomical context of tissues affected by autoimmune diseases. Unlike conventional sequencing methods that dissociate cells from their microenvironment, spa­tial techniques preserve the architecture of inamed tissues, such as the synovial lining in RA or salivary glands in Sjögren’s syndrome, allowing researchers to investigate the relationship between epigenomic states and spatial niches. This is especially crucial in autoimmune pathology, where immune cell inltration, local cytokine gradients, and stromal interactions can shape gene regula­tion in highly localized manners. By combining spatial ATAC-Seq with immunouorescence or in situ hybridization, researchers are beginning to map regulatory element activity with cellular and tissue-level precision, unveiling epigenetic heterogeneity that correlates with lesion severity, immune cell localization, or therapy resistance.
The integration of ATAC-Seq with other single-cell omics technologies, such as single-cell RNA­Seq (scRNA-Seq) and mass spectrometry-based proteomics, provides an even deeper systems-level view of immune regulation. While scATAC-Seq captures the accessibility landscape that enables or restricts gene expression, scRNA-Seq measures the actual transcriptional output. When these data­sets are integrated, they allow for the inference of gene regulatory networks, identication of co­accessible regions, and pinpointing of active enhancers that drive the expression of immune-related genes. Furthermore, coupling this information with proteomic data adds a crucial layer of valida­tion by measuring changes in protein abundance and post-translational modications that directly inuence cell signaling and function. For example, combining these modalities in the context of T1D could reveal accessible enhancers linked to IL2RA expression, corresponding transcriptional