Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3740_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
68
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. C. Wells
Fig. 11.7 The incision into the left atrium below the interatrial groove, exposing the inside of the atrium and the mitral valve. A sucker is secured in the left atrium to aspirate any returning blood
The Annulus
Once the mitral valve is exposed, it is advisable to place interrupted sutures around the annulus (annuloplasty sutures), from Trigone to Trigone, as a rst step. This pulls the valve into an even plane and enhances the view of the valve rendering the components of the valve in anatomical proportion. The placement of the annuloplasty sutures is very important. The needle should be at right angles to the tissue and pass vertically downwards into the ventricular muscle followed by a rotation of the wrist to bring the suture out of the tissue in an even curve so as not to convert the penetrating needle hole into a linear tear (Fig.11.8).
There is a wide choice of annuloplasty devices. The prin­cipal choices are between rigid and exible complete rings or partial bands. The reasons for implanting annular support are rst to reduce the orice area of the valve to ensure opti­mal coaptation and second to stabilise the atrioventricular junction into the future. During the procedure, the presence of the sutures under the weight of the restraining clips reduces the orice by as much as 10%. On completion of the
Fig. 11.8 Note the angle of the needle to the tissue. Its entry should be at 90° to the tissue
structural repair and testing the result by lling the ventricle under tension, the resulting coaptation height can be visual­ised by marking the atrial margin of coaptation with a sterile marking pen (Fig.11.9).
11 Surgical Correction ofDegenerative Mitral Valve Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
69
a
b
a
b
Fig. 11.9 (a, b) The line of coaptation marked with sterile blue ink. The tensioned valve has been marked at the coaptation margin to reveal the depth and evenness of coaptation throughout the length of the commissure
The choice of annuloplasty band size can then be based upon the full surface area of the closed and tensioned valve and not just the aortic leaet as proposed by some (Fig.11.10). Atrioventricular dilation occurs along the free left ventricu­lar portion of the valve orice and not the aorto-mitral cur-
Fig. 11.10 (a, b) The valve is tensioned so that the ascending aorta proximal to the aortic clamp is tense and the band size is chosen based on the full surface area of the tensioned valve
tain portion which does not stretch. Hence there is no rationale for a complete ring. In addition, the base of the ven­tricle is mobile throughout the cardiac cycle hence inherent exibility in the chosen band can be argued to be an advan­tage. A partial band must extend from Trigone to Trigone and not commissure to commissure to ensure long-lasting pre­vention of annular re-expansion (Fig.11.11).
70
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.11 (a) Placement of annuloplasty sutures from Trigone to Trigone. (b) Flexible annuloplasty band secured in position
F. C. Wells
Leaet Techniques
mitral stenosis may result. This may only be detectable on exercise.
Quadrangular Resection ofMural Leaet
Sliding Annuloplasty
This technique, rst popularised by Professor Alain Carpentier involves a reduction of the mural annular circum­ference to compensate for the excised tissue (Figs.11.12 and
11.13). Imaginary radial lines are drawn from the centre of
the aorto-mitral curtain, either side of the prolapse and that segment is excised. Sutures (1–3) are placed across the resected portion and pulled outwards to re-oppose the annu­lar edges, thereby shortening the annulus (see Figs. 11.11 and 11.2).
The exible annuloplasty band is then inserted and the fully repaired valve nally tested.
This long-established procedure for mural leaet pro­lapse, stabilised with an annuloplasty ring, has stood the test of time and remains a mainstay of mitral reconstructive sur­gery. The limitation of the procedure is the reduction in valve opening area which can be signicant and if not appreciated
If, during a quadrangular resection, a larger leaet resection is required, then the tension on the reattached leaet edges will be too great. To surmount this, the annulus can be short­ened in the region by this technique. After the quadrangular resection has been done, each side of the mural leaet is detached from the annulus; in other words, undermining the leaets for 1–2cm. on either side. This length of annulus can then be longitudinally plicated reducing this part of the cir­cumference bringing the cut edges of the leaets back together. The leaets can then be reattached to the annulus and to each other (Fig.11.14).
The annuloplasty band, if one is used, can be held by the tied annuloplasty sutures already through the annulus. If the length of leaet undermining is long, almost to each end of the commissures, then a band may not be necessary.
d
11 Surgical Correction ofDegenerative Mitral Valve Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.12 (a) Lines of intended resection. (b) Quadrangle of leaet tissue excised with the base wider than the leading edge. (c) Annulus fully retracted and the annuloplasty sutures ligated. The divided leaet edges are sutured with interrupted or running 40 Proline™
a
b
71
Imaginary radial lines from top­centre to annulus.
Excised portion
Resected magins
Annulus retracted at reseded margin
c
Retracted annulus closed with 2’0’
with ethibond sutures
Annuloplasty sutures
Leaflet re-approxe with 4 ‘O’proline
72
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. C. Wells
a
Fig. 11.13 (a, b) The annulus is retracted for the annuloplasty. The retracted annulus has been closed and the leaet re-apposed
Triangular Resection
b
Cords will still arise from the edge of the leaets within these indentations giving proof of their congenital origin.
Where the prolapsing segment of leaet is voluminous, with a surface area that is greater than the distance between the non-prolapsing portion, an alternative approach is a triangu­lar resection. Here the base of the triangular resection is at the leaet edge. The depth of the resection into the leaet will be determined by the breadth of the prolapsing segment (Figs.11.15 and 11.16).
With a voluminous leaet, this technique can work well, however, if too much leaet is resected, the sutured leaet can draw the edges of the segment away from the leaet seg­ments on either side giving rise to a leak through the clefts. This may be compensated for by a smaller size annuloplasty band, however if there is a suspicion that this may be the case then alternative methods will be better employed.
If there is a paucity of cords at the margin of the recon­structed leaet, then a Gore-Tex neo cord may be placed at the apex of the repaired leaet and drawn down to the appro­priate height. This procedure is a development of the original imbrication technique described by Dwight McGoon [4].
The outward growth of the neo-leaets may be variable as well, with excessive growth frequently found in the P2 region, but also (although somewhat less frequently) in other parts of the mural leaet (Fig.11.18).
These tall leaets—often unsupported on each side as result of the deep clefts—are vulnerable to high stress load­ing in systole, which may result in leaet prolapse. As these portions frequently have cords that are widely separated, it is common to nd prolapse of these areas in the absence of chordal rupture. The depth of these portions of the mural leaet is frequently equal to that of the aortic leaet. If this is not considered and dealt with at operation, the placement of an annuloplasty ring will bring about early contact between the leaets in early systole, and the reverse folding of the aortic leaet into the outow tract of the left ventricle in mid­to late systole, causing outow tract obstruction and mitral regurgitation. This is referred to as abnormal systolic motion of the anterior leaet or S.A.M. for short. There are ways to prevent this as long as the surgeon is aware of the potential problem; these are (1) reduction of the mural leaet height, and (2) the placement of extremely short neo-cords pulling
Leaet Height Reduction
the leaet almost to the ventricular wall and the use of a large annuloplasty band so as not to reduce the orice area more
The mitral valve leaets arise from cushions of tissue at the atrioventricular junction whilst the heart is a tube in the early foetus. These cushions grow into projections that become the leaets. The junctions of the cushions form the clefts in the leaets. If growth is retarded at those sights, then deep clefts are left, frequently reaching to the annulus (Fig.11.17).
than is needed to produce leaet coaptation of 0.8 cm. Excessive traction of the mural leaet into the ventricular cavity turns the valve into a mono-leaet valve. Whilst this may be effective, it is anti-physiological and may lead to unnecessary extra strain on the aortic leaet which may give rise to aortic leaet prolapse at a future time. It is my prefer-
undercut
d
11 Surgical Correction ofDegenerative Mitral Valve Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.14 (a–c) Sliding annuloplasty. The edges of the incised leaets are undermined on each side and the corresponding annulus shortened by tying each of the annuloplasty sutures. The leaets are then reattached to the annulus and to themselves
Lines of
a
73
A
A: Aortic leaflet
b
c
Stay Suture
Leaflets underwined
• Leaflet edges apposed
• Annuloplasty sutures tied
• Leaflet reattached to annulus
• Annuloplasty ban about to slide in to place.
74
resection
sutured together
de
fg
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. C. Wells
abc
Tr iangular resection
Area for resection
Leaflet with
Leaflet edges
Fig. 11.15 (a–g) The excess tissue to be resected is marked out and then removed. The cut edges are then sewn together, either with continuous or interrupted sutures
ab
cd
11 Surgical Correction ofDegenerative Mitral Valve Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
75
Fig. 11.16 (a–d) Another example of a triangular resection
Fig. 11.17 A deep cleft in the mural leaet extending to the
annulus
76
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. C. Wells
c
d
Fig. 11.18 (a–c) Disproportionately and excessively tall mural leaets. (d) 3-D echo modelling of the prolapsing segments (three different valves)
ence to reduce the height of the mural leaet to restore the normal height ratio of one third of the height of the aortic leaet and then to place an appropriately sized annuloplasty band to optimise coaptation and permanently stabilise the repair (Figs. 11.19, 11.20, 11.21, 11.22, 11.23, 11.24 and
11.25).
The excised portion should take the form of a blunted
trapezoid and not an oval. If an oval is excised when the leaf­let is drawn back to the annulus, it will tend to open up any cleft with the leaet portion next to it and cause a leak between the edges. The trapezoidal resection leaves more tis­sue to abut the leaet next to it (Fig.11.26).
With the leaet reconstructed, it may be necessary to add
neo-Gore Tex™ cords (see later section) (Fig. 11.27). The appropriately sized band is then placed from Trigone to Trigone sizing it on the whole surface area of both leaets with the valve tensioned by a full ventricle.
Fig. 11.19 The base of the leaet is incised with a knife. The incision can be completed with scissors
Mural leaflet detachment from annulus
11 Surgical Correction ofDegenerative Mitral Valve Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
Incised margin
P
2
77
Fig. 11.20 The base of the leaet is incised with a knife. The incision can be completed with scissors
P
1
Atrioventricular fat
P
3
Fig. 11.23 Fat can often be seen in the atrioventricular junction after detachment
Fig. 11.21 The base of the leaet is incised with a knife. The incision can be completed with scissors
Fig. 11.22 Fat can often be seen in the atrioventricular junction after detachment
Fig. 11.24 The suture line is begun