Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_994_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
22 Combining Fat andImplants forGluteal Augmentation
Fig. 22.2 On table marking of subiliac liposuction area
305
Timing of fat-grafting versus implant pocket dissection to our view depends largely on the preference of the surgeon. It can be done before or after implant placement, we recommend to combine both, transfer the larger amount of graft before implant placement and leave a smaller quantity for nal touch-ups. The important thing is not whether to place the fat graft before or after implant place­ment, the important thing is to do it at all.
The common areas that receive fat grafts are the hip, the lateral third of the but­tock, and transition are found between the hip and the gluteal [6]. The fat is injected into the marked areas by positioning the cannulas in the subcutaneous planes via small incisions made on the anks and infragluteal folds. The preoperative topo­graphic marking is key for the success of the fat transfer. During this process, graft is injected subcutaneously through several passes using EVL (expansion vibration lipolling) as described by Del Vecchio. Care is taken to nd the perfect balance between passes for just vibration tissue expansion to loosen up the tissue scaffold and the actual fat inltration. We recommend to focus on the lateral perigluteal areas and avoid the incisional zone for pocket access. Aesthetic focus is grafting into the trochanteric depressions (hip-dips) where volume replacement is highly desired and implants do not really provide any extra volume.
306
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. Aslani and M. G. Bravo
22.1.2 Silicone Implant Placement
For the preparation process for this we do an additional, second skin-prepping with iodine. Additionally, a betadine-soaked compress is sutured over the anus using a number 0 silk stitch, to achieve a watertight separation from the surgical eld.
The procedure entails making a 5cm skin incision on both sides of the interglu­teal cleft (Fig. 22.3). The dissection begins at 45° aiming at preservation of the sacrocutaneous ligament until the gluteus maximus is identied. The muscle is then dissected leaving a 2cm cuff on the medial side. Enough muscle dissection should be made to leave a thick muscle ap of around 3cm. A blunt dissector is rst used to create a submuscular space for the implant in the upper half of the implant pocket (Fig.22.4). When the dissection approaches the height of the sciatic foramen, the dissector is beveled to a atter angle to switch into an intramuscular plane (Video
22.1). Thus the implant is submuscular in the cranial half of the pocket and intra­muscular in the lower half of the pocket. We call this approach “Dual-plane” tech­nique and the idea is to combine the best of both approaches, totally submuscular versus totally intramuscular. Dual-plane dissection achieves maximum muscle cov­erage, both gluteus maximus and medius, and still brings a protective layer of mus­cle tissue between sciatic nerve and implant. Double muscle ap cover gives a signicantly more robust tissue cover in the upper pocket half as compared to the single muscle cover only (Fig.22.5a, b).
A sterile surgical compress is immersed with adrenaline solution and placed inside the pocket during the dissection process to prevent excessive bleeding.
Fig. 22.3 Upper half of the pocket with double muscle ap cover, markings in cadaver lab
22 Combining Fat andImplants forGluteal Augmentation
Fig. 22.4 Upper half of dual plane implant pocket in cadaver specimen
307
abc
Fig. 22.5 (ac) Cadaver dissection upper half dual plane pocket
Determining accurate height and width of the implant ensures an adequate pocket is created to avoid the implant from rotating.
The implant insertion procedure begins with soaking the implant in an antibiotic solution. The implant is then inserted using the plastic funnel devices that have been sterilized. As a measure of preventing excessive uid from accumulating in the pocket, a number 14 suction drain is placed on each pocket. An dynamic suspension suture is used to anchor each gluteal fascia to its contralateral side to achieve mutual
308
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. Aslani and M. G. Bravo
contralateral stabilization and avoid early gluteal implant ptosis. The concept of mutual stabilization is similar to the columns of an “Arabic arch” and this is why the approach has been labeled “Arabic-arch-suture-suspension” (Video 22.2). The subcutaneous layer is closed using a long-term absorbable monolament suture and a negative-pres­sure wound therapy device is used as a dressing for 7days.
a
b
Fig. 22.6 Before and 6months after composite buttock augmentation with 330cc dual plane but­tock implants and perigluteal fat grafting (Fig.22.6)
22 Combining Fat andImplants forGluteal Augmentation
Fig. 22.7 Posterior view. Before and after 3 months after composite buttock augmentation (Fig. 22.7)
309
22.2 Postoperative Care
The postoperative care entails preventing bacterial infections and improving the scarring to facilitate quick healing. We recommend twice daily skin wash with hibi­tane shower gel. Patients receive intravenous antibiotics during the procedure and oral antibiotics for 7days after. Early ambulation helps to minimize the occurrence of venous thrombosis, so pain control is key in order to have the patient walking. After 6–7days following the procedure the drains are removed. It is imperial not to do this before, since patients often become more mobile 4–5days after surgery and it is not unusual that they might drain a larger amount of serous uid then, which would cause pressure increase in the implant pocket space would the drain be removed before. Patients should also not engage in physical activities immediately after the implantation to prevent the implant from displacement, seroma, rotation, and other complications. Immediately after surgery and for 4–6weeks the patients should wear compression garments to prevent swelling and support the surgical areas to enhance comfort.
22.3 Complications
Gluteal implants come with a series of procedure-specic complications. It is important to know that these are very different to issues after breast implants. The number one cause of problems in buttock implants is seroma. Immediate seroma is best prevented by using suction drains after surgery. It is also important to be aware
310
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. Aslani and M. G. Bravo
of the issue of late seroma, occurring 3–6weeks after the procedure. Late seroma often leads to uid drainage from a breakdown in the incisional area and is often confused with primary infection. The difference is important since seroma is usu­ally self-limiting. We recommend prophylactic antibiotics, local wound care, and observation. Spontaneous resolution occurs as often a 99% of affected cases. We point this out because often surgeons with little experience in the procedure remove implants prematurely and unnecessarily.
Using implants of course also carries an increased risk of infection. However, in buttock implants the risk of a primary infection is actually lower than most practi­tioners seem to think. To our experience, buttock implants to the robust muscle cover are very resilient against infection and if infection occurs, it is usually second­ary to a superinfected late seroma and secondary contamination.
Sciatic nerve compression is another possible complication. Our current inci­dence is around 5% of cases. Usually nothing needs to be done, and the problem tends to resolve with the resolution of swelling. If patients have more intense dif­culties, a short high dose treatment with prednisolone will usually solve the problem.
22.4 Conclusion
Gluteal augmentation is among the plastic surgery techniques that are becoming popular in plastic surgery. The two powerful techniques being applied worldwide are silicone implant placement and fat grafting. We have a very high caseload of buttock implants yearly and have identied dual-plane dissection and dynamic pocket suspension as two very strong assets to improve our outcomes and reduce our incidence of problems.
The addition of fat transfer to the supercial subcutaneous layer avoids visibility of the implant contour in thin patients and, if enough fat graft as well as recipient tissue is available, can achieve aesthetically very pleasing volume addition in the area of the trochanteric depression, leading to clearly better outcomes as compared to buttock implants alone.
References
1. Sinno S, Chang JB, Brownstone ND, Saadeh PB, Wall S.Determining the safety and efcacy
of gluteal augmentation: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2016;137(4):1151–6.
2. Cárdenas-Camarena L, Trujillo-Méndez R, Díaz-Barriga JC.Tridimensional combined gluteo-
plasty: liposuction, buttock implants and fat transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(1):53–63.
3. Mod MM, Gonzalez R, de la Peña JA, Mendieta CG, Senderoff DM, Jorjani S.Buttock aug-
mentation with silicone implants: a multicenter survey review of 2226 patients. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2013;131(4):897–901.
22 Combining Fat andImplants forGluteal Augmentation
4. Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA.Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning
using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(3):558–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/
PRS.0b013e31829ad2fa.
5. Aslani A, Del Vecchio DA.Composite buttock augmentation: the next frontier in gluteal aes-
thetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(6):1312–21.
6. Godoy PM, Munhoz AM.Intramuscular gluteal augmentation with implants associated with
immediate fat grafting. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(2):203–15.
311
Chapter 23
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Gluteal Implant Associated withAnaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
GuillermoRamos-Gallardo, AdriánAlejandroCarballo-Zarate, DavidOrozco-Rentería, DanielaLeón, JesúsCuenca-Pardo, andLázaroCárdenas-Camarena
23.1 Clinical Symptoms
The GIA-ALCL is an entity with recent information in the literature. In our popula­tion we know from one case. In the last year reports of two cases are in the literature [1, 2]. Chronic seroma is a common nding as well.
Taking into account the information from BIA-ALCL the following information is shared.
In the case of BIA-ALCL the most common presentation is chronic seroma, but we have reports of capsular contracture as an initial presentation, other ndings are nodes, local signs of swelling and inammation [3]. As a society of Plastic Surgery we concentrated these cases in one group of pathologies, in the last year we have received several samples of possible cases. The most common nding was chronic seroma, next to capsular contracture. We have one case of gluteal implant- associated lymphoma that started as chronic seroma. In BIA-ALCL the most common presen­tation is asymmetry from one side caused by chronic seroma [4]. Although reports are mentioned about bilateral cases that are advance and as well are more aggressive. These kind of cases are involved with late diagnoses. Early suspicious of a possible case can make a difference in recognition of the disease and treatment [5]. The time line is unclear from unilateral asymmetry to an advanced disease that involves
G. Ramos-Gallardo (*) Comite de Seguridad, Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugía Plastica, Estética y Reconstructiva, Mexico City, Mexico
Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
A. A. Carballo-Zarate Hospital Español, Mexico City, Mexico
D. Orozco-Rentería · D. León · J. Cuenca-Pardo · L. Cárdenas-Camarena Comite de Seguridad, Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugía Plastica, Estética y Reconstructiva, Mexico City, Mexico
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Del Vecchio, H. Durán (eds.), Aesthetic Surgery of the Buttock,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13802-7_23
313
314
Capsule
+
G. Ramos-Gallardo et al.
spreading out of the capsule and a more aggressive pathology, what is known is the timing between implant placement and diagnoses, and it is about 10years [6]. In the case of GIA-ALCL it was in an American patient of 1year and in a Brazilian of 11years [1, 2]. The rst case that was reported appears in California, advanced and aggressive. The Brazilian case was found in the capsule, even after removal of the implant. For this reason, capsulectomy should be considered in case of chronic seroma.
23.2 Diagnoses
As chronic seroma is the most common presentation as is the same of breast implant associated lymphoma the rst step is to obtain a sample of seroma that can be han­dled by a pathologist with experience in this disease [7]. Most of the reports in the literature come from well developed countries that count with referral centers [8]. It is important to notify authorities about the adverse event and work with an experi­enced pathologist [9, 10]. If the plastic surgeon feels that the uid can be aspirated without puncture of the implant, an ultrasound guide can help.
It is important to work with a fresh sample, for this reason in countries with no referral center pathologists should be informed in order to not waste time and to make diagnoses possible. If the sample will be studied in more than 24h it should be xed in an equivalent of alcohol of 96%, that means 50% sample and 50% alcohol 96%.
Once the pathologist evaluated the sample, the rst study to consider will be CD30 [7, 8]. If it is positive, rest of markers should be considered in order to con­rm diagnoses (Fig. 23.1). If the case is conrmed additional studies should be
EMA+
Fig. 23.1 Positive case in breast implant patient
CD30
ALK–
ab
23 Gluteal Implant Associated withAnaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 23.2 (a) In this case mammary asymmetry is illustrated due to chronic seroma. (b) Metaplasia synovial
requested. A multidisciplinary team should approach the patient with this condition, where a hematologist should be involved and surgical oncologist should help to plan a capsulectomy en block [8].
All centers, hospitals, and countries have different epidemiologies about this condition [11]. The sensitiveness and specicity is different as well. In case a nega­tive result and chronic seroma persists it is important to plan a surgical exploration to remove the capsule. We don’t know if in future non-lymphoma cases will behave differently. After evaluating capsules and samples from all the country the most common nding is chronic inammation, sometimes silicone is present (Fig.23.2). In this case mammary asymmetry is illustrated due to chronic seroma. Capsulectomy sample, metaplasia synovial (Fig.23.3).
The removal of the capsule should be as complete as possible. We do understand that not all the time it is possible to remove the capsule from the small previous inci­sion. Patients should be informed that an extension of the previous incision is planned in order to remove the complete capsule with the implant. Only by remov­ing the complete capsule, a proper evaluation of the capsule can be done and lym­phoma can be ruled out.
Once the capsule is removed the specimen can be kept in formalin. As a routine in the case of BIA-ALCL we analyze different parts of the capsule, taking 20 parts from different areas (top, bottom, sides, near the patch).
After the initial evaluation of the pathologist, CD 30 will be considered in rst place and if it is positive, markers will be ordered to rule out this pathology [7].
Once the diagnosis is conrmed the next step is to know the extension in the capsule [8]. According to the TNM, we evaluate the extension in the capsule. Following the work with a multidisciplinary team to complete the work. PET scan, complete laboratory tests as well as the proper image study to know the extension into the deep structure in the pelvis if it is the case will be suggested.
If diagnosis is positive since the seroma punction, capsulectomy en block should be considered. As well as an initial evaluation with a hematologist can help to
315
c