Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6029_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
248
Fig. 19.1 Plain lateral film of C2 body destruction by metasta-
sis of breast cancer in a 50 year old woman
19 Tu mor s
the vertebral artery (VA) (Fig. 19.4) [53], adjacent neu- ral structures, and the oropharynx (Fig. 19.5) [77].
19.1.2 Therapeutic Remarks
Depending on tumor staging, histology, age, and general patient status the consequent patient risk versus benefit ratio can be evaluated. The final therapeutic protocol can vary from observation with no therapy (life expectancy less than 6 weeks) to radical, aggressive surgery followed by radiation and chemotherapy. Given the surgical focus of this book, it is important to emphasize that any excision of tumor may impact the statodynamic properties of the spine and in such cases, necessitates appropriate spinal column reconstruction.
19.1.3 Surgical Oncologic Terms
compression, and is also good to determine multilevel spine involvement. The use of gadolinium on T1-weighted images enhances the tumor tissue and allows delineation of normal and abnormal processes. Evaluation of cervical tumors not only requires defin­ing the extent of the lesion but also its relationship to
The terms used to describe the extent of surgical resec­tion are a constant source of confusion. Often, one can read that the resection was performed: “en bloc,” “gross total,” or that there was a “radical resection.” Also, the term “margin” often mixes concept of surgi­cal margin with histological margins.
Fig. 19.2 Destruction of C2 by renal carcinoma metastasis. (a) Coronal plane CT reconstruction. (b) Anterior view 3D CT
19.1 Extradural UCS Tumors
249
Fig. 19.3 C2 affected by metastasis of renal carcinoma, notice
the canal compromise (patient from Fig. 19.2)
Fig. 19.5 Displacement of oropharynx in a case of anterior
prevertebral C2 chordoma spread shown on lateral contrast swallow study
It is difficult to adapt the oncologic definitions used in long bone and soft tissue pathologies for spine surgery purposes. Single-piece removal of the whole vertebra in the UCS is not possible due to the spinal cord. Also, definition of an extracompartmental margin of resection fails if the tumor reaches the extradural space, which is in continuity through the whole spine.
It is clear that the surgical margin is the surgeon’s subjective definition of the border of the tumor formed by either a capsule or pseudocapsule of reactive tis­sue, or by a layer of healthy tissue surrounding infil­trative neoplasms. Conversely, the histological margin can be objectively confirmed as tumor-free only by the laboratory investigations of the specimen after removal.
In concordance with others, we would like to define the meaning of each term [45, 49, 133].
Respecting the surgical margin of the tumor during resection:
Fig. 19.4 Narrowed vertebral artery passing through C2 chor-
doma with extracompartmental extend depicted on vertebral angiogram
• Intra or endolesional (means the surgical margin of
the tumor is disrupted during the procedure)
• Marginal (means single-piece tumor removal along
its surgical border without margin violation)
• Wide (means single-piece removal of tumor sur-
rounded by continuous layer or cuff of healthy tissue)
250
19 Tu mor s
According to the method of resection, one can dis­tinguish:
• Piecemeal resection (means successive, step wise
tumor removal - typical example is curettage)
• En bloc resection (means, tumor removal in one
piece regardless of its margins)
• Spondylectomy (means, removal of the whole verte-
bra regardless of the method used to do it)
In summary, if the tumor spreads from the body poste­rior through both pedicles, the oncologic wide margin resection is not possible. Moreover, if the whole verte­bra is considered as the malignant tumor compartment, en bloc resection is not feasible in UCS (but is some­times possible in lumbar region and may damage the cauda equina, which can be justified in certain lesions e.g.: osteogenic sarcoma or chordoma if the patient accepts such morbidity).
19.1.4 Primary Bone Tumors of UCS
Primary bone tumors of the spine are relatively rare comprising about 4.2% of all spine tumors [1, 16].
19.1.4.1 Benign Primary Bone Tumors
Benign lesions are less frequent than malignant lesions in the UCS [14, 43, 77]. They occur predom­inantly in the second and third decades of life and affect males twice as often as females [77]. The tumors most commonly seen in the region of the cer­vical spine are osteomas (44%), osteoblastomas (15%), and aneurysmal bone cysts (15%). Less fre­quently seen are eosinophilic granulomas (12%), giant cell tumors (5%), and osteochondromas (5%) [77]. Much rarer, and described in case reports are: hemangiomas, fibrous dysplasia, and a few cases of Gorham disease [76, 77]. Both, the atlas and axis can be involved; however, C2 due to the larger can­cellous bone content is much more frequently affected.
Although benign tumors that occur in the cervical
spine are from a wide range of histological types, they have many common as well as differentiating features that will be described below.
Classification, Grading, and Staging
In order to properly evaluate the prognosis, treatment feasibility and methods to follow outcomes, benign tumors should be divided into similar groups. Therefore, systems classifying tumors are necessary. The oncologic staging of primary bone tumors, based on clinical fea­tures, radiographic patterns, and histological behavior described for long bone neoplasms by Enneking et al. [44, 45] has been adopted for benign primary bone spi­nal tumors [21, 77]. It distinguishes three stages of benign and six stages of malignant primary spine tumors. The classification system is named after Enneking.
Enneking Staging of Primary Benign Spine Tumors
S I first stage, latent, asymptomatic, well-bordered by a
true capsule
S II second stage, slowly growing, symptomatic, thin
capsule with reactive tissue
S III third stage, aggressive, rapid growth, symptomatic,
capsule discontinuous – absent, or reactive pseudocapsule, invades neighboring compartments
A reproducible classification system that describes the tumor extent, localization, and surgical accessibility was proposed originally by Weinstein and was modi­fied by Boriani et al. is named WBB surgical staging (Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini surgical classification, WBB) [21, 131].
WBB Surgical Staging
WBB system divides the transverse extension of verte­bral tumors into 12 radiating zones (numbered 1–12 in a clockwise order with no. 1 on the left side of the spinous process) and 5 concentric layers (A–E concen­tric zones from the paravertebral extraosseous com­partments (A) to the dural involvement (E) and the VA foramen area (F)). These staging systems were tested for observer reliability with very good intra-observer reliability results; however, the inter-observer reliabil­ity was only moderate [34].
The Enneking and WBB staging status, together with tumor histology obtained by biopsy can give us an idea of potential treatment possibilities, the patient’s
19.1 Extradural UCS Tumors
251
prognosis and can also allow comparison of treatment strategies, and outcomes between centers.
For example, a small osteoma of the right posterior C2 arch can be classified as: osteoma, Enneking S1, and WBB 11 B. This information is comprehensive enough to consult the oncologic center, establish prog­nosis and treatment strategy. If dimensions of the lesion measured on CT images are added, the informa­tion is complete for long-term follow-up and observa­tion in conservatively treated patients.
Clinical Symptoms
The clinical symptoms of primary bone tumors are nonspecific. The first symptom can be a constant or episodic neck pain unusual in a young individual. The symptoms are dependent on tumor location, its extent, and the likely eventual pathologic vertebral fracture, which can cause a simple radiculopathy or extend to create significant myelopathy. In osteoid osteomas, nocturnal pain is very characteristic and occurs in about 50% of patients [101]. Extracompartmental tumor spread, such as from aneurysmal bone cyst, can cause torticollis or even a palpable posterior neck mass.
Radiology
lesions (S2-3) necessitate early surgical management to prevent clinical symptoms. Depending on the histol­ogy and surgical accessibility, radical tumor resection is preferred. Puncture biopsy is often helpful prior to the surgical procedure. In some lesions, endolesional or marginal resection is sufficient; however, in aggres­sive tumors with a known tendency to recur, radical resection to the extent that is allowed by anatomic UCS complexity should be performed. Wide resec­tions involving the stabilizing structures (body, pedi­cle, and facets) have to be followed by a single stage UCS reconstruction. As many of the tumors can pres­ent in childhood, the growing potential of the imma­ture spine must be considered. In these situations, using largely autologous bone that is fixed without growing restraints (wires often better than screws) is required. All the approaches described in Chap. 4. (posterior midline, high anterolateral, lateral, and tran­soral) can be used to reach the tumor mass. Direct or indirect embolization can help in the treatment of vas­cularized tumors. Despite some tumors being benign, there is often a tendency to recur and in some tumors adjuvant therapy is recommended. Although evidence is limited, focused radiotherapy is recommended in osteoblastomas, aneurysmal bone cysts, and LCH by some authors, especially in recurrent tumors [31,
47, 70]. Standard chemotherapy has not shown much
effect in these tumors although bisphosphonates are sometimes tried.
Aggressive osteolytic neoplasms can easily be seen on plain radiographs, usually as a result of deformity or vertebral body collapse; however, most of the benign tumors are more accurately detected by CT or MRI. The CT scan with bone windows defines bony pathology precisely. The MRI is less effective in evaluating bony anatomy but can clearly depict the relationship of the tumor to the adjacent soft tissue and neural structures. In growing tumors with a reactive pseudocapsule, a radioisotope bone scan can reveal the hot spot leading to further investigations. As in other pathologies of the UCS, all the anatomy must be clearly understood if sur­gical decompression and reconstruction are planned.
General Treatment Strategy
S1 tumors usually do not need treatment until a patho­logic fracture or severe pain occurs; however, growing
Osteoid Osteomas and Osteoblastomas
Osteoid-producing tumors such as osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas are rare lesions in the UCS level. Osteoblastomas are seen less frequently than osteoid osteomas with an incidence of 10–25% of primary osseous spine tumors [6]. They affect young people with a male predominance of 2:1. Osteomas occur pre­dominantly within the posterior elements, the arches, facet joints, and pedicles [18, 77] but are occasionally found in the vertebral body [118]. Both types of tumors are histologically similar, however osteoblastomas are more aggressive, larger (more than 20 mm), often involve both the anterior and posterior vertebral seg­ments and can recur in up to 20% [76]. There is only one report of osteoma conversion to osteoblastoma in the literature [25], and in reviewing the literature there is not a clear definition of the differences between the
252
two tumor types. Only the extremes, small osteomas and large, spreading osteoblastomas can be distin­guished clearly from their radiological appearance.
Diagnosis
The clinical symptoms are often non-specific. The patients present with neck pain, classically with noc­turnal peaks that responds to salicylates and NSAIDs. Osteoblastomas can be often visible on plain X-rays as an osteolytic lesion and can frequently cause vertebral body deformity (Fig. 19.6), however the small osteoid osteomas do not. CT scan is very useful in distinguish­ing the tumor type. While osteoma can typically be seen as sclerotic bone with a round radiolucent ovoid exophytic mass (Fig. 19.7), osteoblastoma is detected as a multilocular, cavernous lytic structure (Fig. 19.8) or as aggressive large osteoma (larger than 20 mm) without a sclerotic border.
Treatment Strategy
19 Tu mor s
Fig. 19.7 Osteoma of the C2 lamina with an internal exophytic
extend shown on axial CT
Currently, intralesional excision (curettage) of the nidus is the widely accepted treatment of osteomas, even in the UCS area [89]. Nevertheless, radiofre­quency ablation has been successfully used in their treatment [28, 29, 74]. Those who are asymptomatic or
respond to pharmacological management with aspirin or NSAIDs can be simply observed [26, 91].
Osteoblastomas also typically involve the poste­rior elements of the spine, but due to their larger size and aggressive behavior may extend into the pedicle,
Fig. 19.6 Osteoblastoma of C6 in a 16 year-old female. Osteolytic
process led to body collapse – “vertebra plana” appearance
Fig. 19.8 Osteoblastoma of C6 (patient from Fig. 19.6) show-
ing the whole vertebra involvement and honeycomb structure. Axial CT scan
19.1 Extradural UCS Tumors
vertebral body, and can compromise the spinal canal [59]. In 1964, Lichtenstein and Sawyer first reported a series of 20 osteoblastomas and concluded that these tumors throughout the skeletal system should gener­ally be treated, conservatively. However, they empha­sized that osteoblastomas located in the spinal axis should be surgically decompressed and then irradiated [79]. The recurrence rate for osteoblastomas after sim­ple resection has been reported between 10% and 19% [66, 81]. In the largest review of 306 spinal osteoblas­toma cases collected at Mayo Clinic over 17.5 years, complete treatment and clinical follow-up was only available for 75 patients. In this study, intralesional resection had a significant recurrence rate of 19.0% (10/52), marginal resection 5.6% (1/18), and surpris­ingly en bloc resection 20.0%. However, these radical resections were probably not wide-margin resections. The authors noted that these lesions have the potential for local recurrence after subtotal resection [81]. From the available literature it can be summarized that intra­lesional resection is recommended for nonaggressive osteoblastomas (Enneking 2) and wide-margin resec­tion for aggressive osteoblastomas (Enneking 3) [59].
The role of radiation therapy in recurrent or incom­pletely resected tumors is controversial, with the majority of cases showing no advantage, but a minority demonstrating a benefit [134]. Marsh et al. concluded in their review of 197 osteoblastoma cases that “radio­therapy does not alter the course of the disease and appears to be contraindicated” [83]. Adjunctive radia­tion therapy with primary surgery probably can be ben­eficial in the case of stage 3 osteoblastomas as well as in recurrent tumors [18, 59]. Chemotherapy has a lim­ited role in recurrent aggressive osteoblastomas and there are only a few case reports in the literature [59].
Our Preference
In concordance with the Harrop et al. systematic review [59], we prefer to observe osteomas without clinical symptoms and located in noneloquent statodynamic spine areas. If patient becomes symptomatic, either radiofrequency CT-guided ablation [9] or enucleation of the osteoma is performed (Fig. 19.9).
In nonaggressive osteoblastomas (Enneking stage S2), a radical resection is performed if anatomically possible, although endolesional tumor removal can be sufficient. Growing and aggressive tumors (Enneking
253
Fig. 19.9 Osteoma capsule after high-speed drill bone removal.
Intraoperative picture
S3) should be resected as radically as possible. We have not had a patient with an S3 osteoblastoma in UCS region; however, we have had a good outcome after total spondylectomy of C6 osteoblastoma in a 16-year-old girl who has survived more than 7 years without recurrence (Fig. 19.10).
Aneurysmal Bone Cysts
Aneurymal bone cysts (ABCs) are non-neoplastic in nature, but are expansile, composed of thin-walled cystic areas filled with blood. They were initially described by Jaffe and Lichtenstein in 1942 [67] and represent approximately 15% of all primary spine tumors but are found most frequently in flat bones (pelvis) [3, 39]. In 10–30% of ABC cases, the spine is involved. Commonly, they are located in the thoracic and lumbar spine [61], but around 25% of the time they can arise in the cervical spine [30, 77]. ABCs gen­erally occur in first two decades of life without gender predilection. They are usually localized to posterior spine elements but circumferential vertebral involve­ment is not uncommon. They can reach enormous size without clinical consequences. Spontaneous resolution of ABC has been described; however, progression is more common [30, 61, 77, 127].
254
Fig. 19.10 Plain radiographs 7 years after total spondylectomy
for osteoblastoma showing a good bone fusion without recurrence (patient from Figs 19.6 and 19.8). (a) Lateral projection. (b) AP
19 Tu mor s
(Fig. 19.12). Selective angiography can be performed for embolization and can reveal the common arterial feeders to the spinal cord.
Treatment Strategy
Simple curettage with or without bone grafting, com­plete resection, embolization only, radiation therapy or combination of these methods were used for treatment of ABCs [59]. En bloc resection appears to have the highest rate of cure; however, achieving complete exci­sion is very difficult in ABCs, especially in the UCS. Boriani et al. reported only 2/41 cases in which they per­formed en bloc resection without adjuvant radiation [19]. Gross total endolesional resection using a high­speed drill has also been reported as effective with long­term cures [3, 19, 40, 61]. However, according to other authors, intralesional, incomplete excision is associated with a relatively high progression rate of up to 25% within the first 2 years after surgery in 90% of patients [19, 30, 61, 128]. Radiation therapy has limited primary indications and remains an adjuvant for patients with inoperable lesions, aggressive recurrent disease, and medical conditions that place them at a high surgical risk or in patients with incomplete excision. Boriani et al reported four patients without local disease progression after radiation alone [19]. Capanna et al. has seen three local progressions in six irradiated patients [30]. The successful use of preoperative, selective arterial embo­lization has been documented for ABCs of the pelvis and long bones, but its role as the sole mode of therapy in the spine is more questionable [76, 88]. Embolization alone may be considered in patients with a recurrent lesion after previous surgeries, or in patients who cannot medically tolerate surgery and only if pathological frac­ture, spinal deformity, instability, and neurologic com­promise are absent [19]. It is important to note that fatalities have been reported with embolization proce­dures, particularly with cervical spine lesions [96].
Diagnosis
Clinically, ABCs can be silent with only neck pain, but can present with vertebral collapse, deformity or signs of neural compression. Plain radiographs can demon­strate an osteolytic lesion with “ballooning out” of the bone cortex. This is confirmed by a typical CT appear­ance (Fig. 19.11) of thin-walled cavities deforming the vertebral bony borders filled with blood. MRI demon­strates the relationship to the spinal canal contents
Our Preference
As we have only very limited experience with this type of primary bone lesion in the UCS, we have to follow the recommendations of Harrop et al. in their system­atic review [59]. The aneurysmal bone cyst should be removed as radically as possible to prevent further dis­ease progression. Due to anatomic restrictions, this goal can be difficult to achieve in the UCS, especially
19.1 Extradural UCS Tumors
255
Fig. 19.11 CT of aneurysmal bone cyst of C2 in a 7 year old girl. (a) Coronal plane reconstruction. (b) Sagittal reconstruction
showing extracompartmental extend. (c) Axial scan
if the lesion involves vertebral structures circumferen­tially. As these lesions often destroy stabilizing struc­tures, reconstruction of the spine is necessary. This has to be done with respect to the age of patient, keeping in mind they frequently are not finished with bone growth. Therefore, dynamically fixed (wires) autologous bone grafts seem to be more reasonable than stable “non­growing” constructs. Other possibilities can include temporary metal-bone fixation with hardware removal at a later date. Selective arterial or direct percutaneous
puncture embolization can precede the surgery to decrease perioperative blood loss.
Adjuvant, focused radiotherapy can be added if radi­cal resection is not achievable and/or in recurrence but its benefit is questionable. The recurrence rate is reported as high as 25%; however, this is probably not true recur­rence but progression of residual neoplastic tissue growth left in place after nonradical surgery. Complete cure is reached if the resection zone is remineralized and without CT visible tumor at 4 years follow-up.
256
19 Tu mor s
primary bone tumors with 10% of them affecting the spine [38]. The cervical spine is rarely involved and in the UCS even less frequently. Usually, they originate from the vertebral body but gradually involve the pos­terior structures as well. Prognosis of GCT in spine is unclear with a high recurrence rate whatever treat­ment is used.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is often delayed as the initial symptom is often pain with neurological deficit occurring later. GCTs present as purely lytic lesions on plain films and the CT is non-specific showing differing areas of oste­olysis and reactive tissue with new bone formation. MRI (Fig. 19.13), usually, does not add more diagnos­tic information and thus free-hand or CT-guided biopsy is performed. The tissue histologically reveals giant osteoclastic cells with spindle-shaped cells and regions of fibrous tissue [87]. Because of frequent reactive hypervascularization the bone scintigraphy is nearly always positive.
Fig. 19.12 MRI of aneurysmal bone cyst (patient from
Fig. 19.11) and its relationship to neural structures and external spread. (a) Axial image showing canal compromise. (b) Frontal plane T1 image
Giant Cell Tumors (GCT )
GCTs are locally aggressive bone tumors originating from histiofibroblastic elements. Their behavior is unpredictable, transforming to malignant forms in 10% and occasionally having pulmonary metastases [48, 76]. Contrary to other primary bone tumors, they occur more frequently in females with a peak inci­dence in the third decade. They comprise 4–8% of
Treatment Strategy
All treatment modalities have been used to treat GCTs. Despite some papers describing long-term success of radiation therapy alone [33] or embolization only [62],
Fig. 19.13 MRI of recurrent giant cell tumor (Courtesy of Dr
Fricˇ, Rikshospitalet HF, Oslo, Norway)
19.1 Extradural UCS Tumors
257
the combination of radical surgery, when feasible, and adjuvant therapy seem to be the most effective [59]. Radiotherapy can be recommended in partial resections.
Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) – Eosinophilic Granulomas, Histiocytosis X
This lesion, often called eosinophilic granuloma is a benign osteolytic bone process caused by reticuloen­dotheliosis of unknown origin. The first description is credited to Otani and Ehrlich and to Lichtenstein and Jaffe [78, 95]. It is more common in the first two decades of life with a male predilection. The incidence of LCH is approximately 1:1,500,000 inhabitants [93]. Spinal localization may be solitary or multiple and usu­ally involves only the vertebral body. Wilner and other authors conclude that in cases of spinal LCH the thoracic vertebrae are involved most often (54%), followed by the lumbar (35%), and cervical vertebrae (11%) [132]. Bertram et al. conducted a meta-analysis of their own patients and 53 other cases of cervical LCH reported in the literature till 2002. The UCS was involved in 54% of adults and in 40% of children. In both groups, the verte­bral body was affected in the majority of cases [12].
observation to resection and/or filling the lesion with bone cement. Gorham disease is an extremely rare osteolytic pro­cess that has spontaneous resolution and has been reported in the UCS area also [76]. Osteochondroma is derived from hamartous tissue and is extremely rare in the UCS; however, if present and growing, can cause neurological compression or even death [76, 106].
Fibrous dysplasia is another hamartomatous condi­tion, which leads to weakening of trabecular bone structure and occasionally to body collapse. It usually resolves spontaneously; however, when causing defor­mity, surgical correction is indicated.
19.1.4.2 Malignant Primary Bone Tumors
Primary malignant bone tumors are more common in older age groups than benign lesions with the peak incidence occurring in the fourth–sixth decades of life. The cervical spine is involved in about 20% of all spine primary bone malignant tumors and approximately 25% of these occur in the UCS region, particularly in the C2 vertebra. Males are affected three times more frequently than females [20].
Diagnosis
Cervical pain, limitation of movement, and torticollis are the most frequent symptoms. Only the osteolytic lesion can be seen radiographically and often only biopsy can confirm the diagnosis.
Treatment Strategy
Reported treatment of cervical LCH varies from simple immobilization, radiotherapy, and local steroid injec­tions, to surgical removal with anterior spine reconstruc­tion. The outcome was good in most of the published cases independently of the choice of treatment [12]. In general, surgery is indicated only in cases of body col­lapse with deformity and/or neurological deficit.
Other Benign Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions
Hemangiomas can rarely occur in the UCS region. Their treatment is dependent upon the symptoms and structural involvement. Therapy can vary from
Diagnosis
These tumors are diagnosed often late in the course of the disease and complete vertebral involvement and/or spreading to adjacent compartments is common. This is caused either by slow asymptomatic growth or, alter­nately, by extremely fast progression. The clinical complaints are nonspecific with neck pain and muscu­lar spasms being most common and the tumor is often not discovered until the adjacent soft and/or neurovas­cular structures are involved. The patient’s status can dramatically worsen during rapid tumor growth with progressive neurologic deficit, swallowing difficulties in the case of anterior extra-compartmental extension, or intractable pain that forces the patient to support his head manually. Plain films often show only an oste­olytic lesion (Fig. 19.14); however, if the tumor spreads anteriorly, pharyngeal (Fig. 19.5) and even tracheal dislocation or a neoplastic mass shadow located pre­vertebrally can be seen. Nonetheless, for diagnosis, prognostic, and surgical considerations, CT and MRI are essential. Frequently bone scintigraphy or, more commonly, PET are used to evaluate possible multiple