Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2754_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
56 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
However, technological advances such as the advent of reverse transcription isothermal amplication (ie, RT- loop- mediated isothermal amplication [RT-LAMP]), in which amplication reaction occurs at a constant temperature, have enabled molec­ular diagnostic tests to be applied to a POC testing platform.19 Molecular tests are typically highly sensitive, provide a qualita­tive result or a semiquantitative measure of pathogen burden, and are useful for detecting active infections.
Serological methods detect the presence of immunoglobu­lin M (IgM) or immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against the virus in a whole blood, plasma, or serum sample. ese methods typically use enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) techniques. Performing serological tests involve applying a small sample of blood from a nger stick (ie, drops) to a cartridge containing the immunoassay, followed by a couple of drops of a buer solution. e qualitative results should then be readily displayed within minutes. e initial antibody response to an infection varies for each pathogen and among individuals. e response is comprised of IgM antibodies followed, in time, by IgG antibodies. us, a test that detects IgM antibodies would indicate a recently acquired infection, whereas one detecting IgG antibodies would signify that some time had elapsed since acquisition of infection. Serologic methods do not detect active acute infection, and are typically used for diagnosis of chronic infections or public health disease surveillance and epidemiol­ogy eorts (ie, HIV, HCV, and COVID-19).
USES AND APPLICATION OF COMMON CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS– WAIVED POINT- OF-CARE TESTS
HgbA1c
Use in Pharmacy
An estimated 34.2 million Americans have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, with an additional 7.3 million remain­ing undiagnosed.21 In 2015, it was estimated that 88 million Americans age 18 or older had prediabetes.21 Measurement of the percent concentration of glycated hemoglobin (HgbA1c) in blood is a useful CLIA- waived POC test for identifying patients with prediabetes and monitoring patients with diabetes during routine follow- up visits. Pharmacists can perform screening for diabetes as part of large community or corporate health and wellness eorts. Individuals identied as being at risk can then be oered counseling on nonpharmacologic lifestyle changes (eg, exercise, dietary adjustments, and smoking cessation) or referred to their provider for additional follow- up. It is impor­tant that pharmacists reference national diabetes guidelines when discussing results and determining the appropriate time to refer patients to their primary care provider.
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
Patients at risk for diabetes that do not have current diagnostic testing for diabetes should obtain an initial laboratory- based HgbA1c to determine glycemic status; however, if a validated and regularly monitored CLIA- waived POC test is used for the HgbA1c, it may be acceptable to use that test for diagnosis when associated signs and symptoms are present.22 For patients with a current diagnosis, CLIA- waived POCT of HgbA1c for moni­toring allows for more timely disease management.23 Immediate feedback from CLIA- waived POCT has demonstrated increased likelihood of medical or pharmaceutical intervention, as well as greater HgbA1c lowering as compared with commercial labo­ratory testing.
24
e use of CLIA- waived POC tests provides another tool for pharmacists practicing in patient- centered, team- based envi­ronments to contribute to the appropriate management of chronic diseases. CLIA- waived POCT services are also used in outpatient pharmacy settings to monitor the safety and ecacy of medications as well as provide measurable clinical outcome data consistent with evidence- based guidelines. CLIA- waived POC tests are used in the screening of at- risk patients for certain disease states (eg, diabetes, dyslipidemia) and in their long- term management. Direct pharmacist involvement using CLIA- waived POCT in conjunction with medication therapy services, collab­orative practice agreements (CPAs), or collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreements can assist patients in reaching their chronic disease management goals as well as build strong patient and pharmacist relationships demonstrating positive clinical outcomes and return on investment. perform CLIA- waived POC tests to screen for infections of public health interest (eg, HCV, SARS-CoV-2, and inuenza), or to aid in the diagnosis and management of an acute infection in an individual patient (eg, inuenza, GAS). is section explores common CLIA- waived POCT services provided by pharmacists in the outpatient setting; however, it is not an all- inclusive repre­sentation of the pharmacist’s role in POCT.
1,20
Pharmacists also
Application of HgbA1c Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
As part of enhanced pharmacy services, pharmacists in an outpatient setting can build CLIA- waived POCT services into their workow. Depending on the state board of pharmacy’s statutes, the pharmacist engaged in a CPA/CDTM agreement can then follow the protocol to adjust medication dosages, recommend nonpharmacological therapies, or schedule addi­tional testing or physician follow- up (Minicase 1).
Performance Characteristics
Prior to the early 1990s, measurement of HgbA1c was not stan­dardized, so it was used only as a surrogate marker of glycemic control. In the early 1990s, the landmark Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) established the correlation between HgbA1c measurement and the risk of developing complications from diabetes; subsequently, target values were created to lower patients’ risk of poor outcomes. standardization was needed because in the DCCT a very small dierence, such as 2%, in mean HgbA1c values between treat­ment groups translated into a signicant decrease in the risk for a variety of complications from diabetes.25 e National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) was initi­ated to standardize HgbA1c test results so laboratory results
25-27
Rigorous
CHAPTER 4 • PoinT- of-CARE TEsTing 57
https://t.me/med1917
MINICASE 1
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and HgbA1C
Stuart M., a 60- year- old man with a 5- year history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, presents to his primary care clinic for a follow- up visit. Although he was diagnosed 5 years earlier, he exhibited symptoms of diabetes for at least 2 years before diagnosis, including nocturia. He reports increased physical activity but has gained 10 lb over the past year with little success in weight loss (weight 190 lb; height 510; BMI 27.3 kg/m2). He reports eating a high- carbohydrate diet with pasta or bread at every dinner. StuartM.’s medications for diabetes include metformin 500- mg tablets, one tablet twice a day for the past 4 years, and various nutritional supplements that he has tried with no noticeable improvement. His personal blood glucose logs over the past 3 months indicate values ranging throughout the day from 108 to 264 mg/dL. His previous A1C level, tested with the POCT device 3 months ago at the clinic, was 7.8%. The pharmacist performs POC A1C testing based on a CPA. StuartM.’s vital signs include blood pressure (BP), 128/78mm Hg;
were comparable to those in the DCCT.27 As part of the NGSP, a network of laboratories works with test manufacturers to stan­dardize their methods.27 Over the years, the rigorous standard­ization eorts have facilitated the monitoring of HgbA1c with rapid reporting of results, which has demonstrated improved glycemic control in type 1 and insulin- treated type 2 patients with diabetes.
28,29
e American Diabetes Association recommends that the HgbA1c methods used be NGSP certied.30 NGSP requires annual manufacturer certication of POC instruments against a secondary reference laboratory with a HgbA1c range of 4% to 10%. e HgbA1c reporting range for certain devices may exceed the NGSP certication of accuracy up to 10%, thus requiring the end user to assess a manufacturer’s docu­mentation of calibration at the upper limit of their reportable range.24 Although the same quality standards apply for labo­ratory and POC HgbA1c systems, a concern regarding the lack of required prociency testing for end users performing CLIA- waived POC HgbA1c tests exists.
25,26
Few data character­ize how these methods truly perform when conducted in the setting of a CLIA- waived laboratory; thus, their real analyti­cal performance is not known.
25,26
Nonetheless, data indicate that CLIA- waived POC methods for HgbA1c perform no worse than many laboratory- based HgbA1c methods.25 Moreover, in a series of studies, investigators have demonstrated that the analytical performance of POC instruments for HgbA1c have improved considerably in the last decade.
31,32
Measurement of HgbA1c via CLIA- waived POC tests are based on structural dierences among the various types of hemoglobin (Hgb) mol­ecules, using either anity separation or more specic immu­noassays.26 Anity separation methods use a boronate matrix to measure “total” glycation and distinguish glycated Hgb from nonglycated Hgb.26 Based on anity separation, the analyzers of the CLIA- waived POC tests measure the percentage of HgbA1c.
heart rate (HR), 84 beats/min; respiration rate (RR), 20 breaths/ min; and HgbA1C, 8.3%.
QUESTION: What does this A1C level indicate?
DISCUSSION: The rise in A1C level of 0.5% over 3 months indicates
that the patient’s average blood glucose level is increased, and he is at increased risk for diabetes complications. In addition to the A1C level, the patient’s weight gain and report of a high- carbohydrate diet would contribute to the pharmacist’s decision to modify therapy. According to the CPA and following therapeutic guidelines, the pharmacist may decide to maximize the metformin therapy and educate the patient on dietary strategies to reduce the amount of carbohydrates consumed and increase physical activity with the goal of weight loss. The pharmacist would also recommend a follow- up visit with a repeat A1C level in 3 months.
An advantage to anity separation methods is a lack of interfer­ence by nearly all Hgb variants or derivatives.26 Immunoassay methods use specic antibodies directed toward the rst several amino acids and the glucose molecule of the N- terminal of the β- chain of the Hgb molecule.26 ese methods measure total Hgb through methods including turbidimetric measurement and latex agglutination inhibition.26 Although most immuno­assays do not interfere with common Hgb variants (eg, HbAS, HbAC, HbAD, and HbAE), they are subject to interference with rare Hgb variants resulting from amino acid substitutions.25 Overestimation of HgbA1c due to variants could result in overly aggressive treatment; thus, it is important for the user to factor in this potential inuence.
24
In evaluating the performance characteristics of CLIA­waived POC, HgbA1c tests bias and measures of imprecision are important.25 Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision for HgbA1c POCT devices have been suggested by some authors at within 0.2 points of true value and a coecient of variation <3%.32 As the measurement of HgbA1c can result in therapy adjustments, consistency between POCT devices, TAT, and methods are important components of a laboratory’s policies and procedures. erefore, using devices meeting NGSP qual­ity measures that are subject to regular monitoring for accuracy will help ensure accurate and standardized results.
Hemoglobin
Use in Pharmacy
Anemia is caused by the impaired production or increased destruction of red blood cells, blood loss, or uid overload. Several CLIA- waived POC tests for Hgb and hematocrit (Hct) using capillary blood samples have been used in critical care settings as well as in outpatient settings to assist with the diag­nosis of anemia or its associated morbidities.
58 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
Patients at risk for anemia include those who have deciencies in their diet, intestinal disorders, chronic conditions, or genetic disorders as well as those who are menstruating or pregnant. Pharmacists using POC tests for Hgb in outpatient settings can screen for anemia as well as monitor therapies.
Application of Hemoglobin Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
Hemoglobin POCT devices use relatively small amounts of nger stick blood, allowing for ease of use for trained pharma­cists, and quick results. Pharmacists may use results to manage or monitor anemia, providing recommendations to the patient and communicating results or recommendations to the provider. Sickle cell disease is a common genetic disorder worldwide that has used POCT devices for the screening and early diagnosis of the disease. However, a detailed discussion of application to sickle cell disease is outside the scope of this chapter.
Performance Characteristics
e CLIA- waived POC tests to determine an Hgb level are typi­cally based on either the conductometric method or the spectro­photometric method.33 e commonly used spectrophotometric method measures the azide- methemoglobin formed by the test reagent mixed with a drop- size sample of capillary, venous, or arterial blood. e conductometric POCT device uses optical absorption photometry to obtain Hgb and Hct from a single drop of blood in less than 1 minute.
In addition to the POCT devices described previously, a non­invasive, multi- wavelength sensor exists that uses a spectropho­tometric method to determine Hgb concentration.34 Another device also uses a sensor that emits wavelengths of light to mea­sure Hgb concentration data based on light absorption through the nger. In a similar manner as conventional pulse oximetry, it uses signal processing algorithms and adaptive lters to trans­late the absorption data. e proposed advantages of a noninva­sive testing device would be no risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens for the pharmacist and a painless process for the patient.
Physiologic factors can aect Hgb measurement, empha­sizing the need for consistency in laboratory procedures and documentation. Identied causes of variation include capil­lary blood versus venous blood, tourniquet use for longer than 30seconds, patient position (standing, sitting, or supine), time of day, whether the right or le hand is used, and even which nger is used for a capillary sample.
35
Cholesterol
Use in Pharmacy
Heart disease has a profound eect on the United States popula­tion as the leading cause of death among men and women and aects all races and ethnic groups.36 In 2018, it was estimated that atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) caused nearly one of every three deaths in the United States.36 Elevated cholesterol is one of the leading causes of ASCVD. Hyperlipid­emia, dened as a total serum cholesterol >200 mg/dL, aects
an estimated 95 million adults, although only an estimated 43million are taking medication(s) to reduce their risk.
Pharmacists perform screening for ASCVD risk as part of large community or corporate health and wellness eorts. Indi­viduals identied as at risk are oered counseling on nonphar­macologic lifestyle changes (eg, exercise, dietary adjustments, blood pressure management, and smoking cessation) or referred to their provider for additional follow- up. Additionally, under a CPA/CDTM agreement, pharmacists can initiate or modify medications to minimize a patient’s ASCVD risk.
37
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
While many workplace health and wellness plans oer annual cholesterol screenings, current clinical guidelines recommend screening adult patients every 4 to 6 years to assess a patient’s ASCVD risk.38 Patients on therapy are oen monitored on a routine basis.
38
Application of Cholesterol Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
Trained pharmacists applying and properly using CLIA- waived POC tests for the management of chronic diseases provides signicant benets to community health. Chronic disease management for cardiovascular disease and hyperlipidemia, specically, are areas in which pharmacists have demonstrated a positive impact on outcomes.1 Managing ASCVD and lowering ASCVD risk oen require prescription medication therapies in addition to nonpharmacological lifestyle changes. In addition, clinical management guidelines for ASCVD and the medications used in its treatment recommend regular monitoring of labora­tory values to determine appropriate drug dosing. It is important for pharmacists to reference national disease state guidelines when discussing results and determining the appropriate time to refer patients to their primary care provider.
As part of enhanced pharmacy services, pharmacists in an outpatient setting can build CLIA- waived POCT services into their workow. As described previously, common CLIA- waived POC tests for chronic disease state management require the col­lection of a small blood sample for the monitoring of choles­terol. Depending on the state board of pharmacy’s statutes, the pharmacist engaged in a CPA/CDTM agreement could then follow the protocol to adjust medication dosages, recommend nonpharmacological therapies, or schedule additional testing or physician follow- up. e accessibility of pharmacists enables them to reach large numbers of adults at risk for ASCVD with appropriate cholesterol testing, which may benet prevention and treatment eorts in a community.
Performance Characteristics
Historically, the National Cholesterol Education Program’s goal to reduce morbidity and mortality caused by ASCVD relied on accurate and precise measurement of the lipid prole. In response to the need to improve cholesterol measurement, the CDC created the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network to ensure that manufacturers of diagnostic products in meeting the criteria of the National Reference System for Cholesterol (NRS/CHOL).39 e NRS/CHOL determines the
CHAPTER 4 • PoinT- of-CARE TEsTing 59
https://t.me/med1917
methods and materials for cholesterol testing that are used by research laboratories, which may determine the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association preven­tion guidelines for healthcare professionals on the treatment and management of blood cholesterol to reduce ASCVD risk.
Several of the CLIA- waived tests have demonstrated accept able ranges of specicity and sensitivity when compared with test methods from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Insti­tute (CLSI).40 Many waived tests and devices are available for the testing of cholesterol that report results ranging from only total cholesterol to an entire standard lipid panel (eg, total cholesterol, high- density lipoprotein, low- density lipoprotein­calculated, and triglycerides). ese tests and devices typically use nger stick capillary or venous blood samples and produce results within a few minutes. ere are two common CLIA­waived POC test methodologies, one using combined enzy­matic methodology and solid- phase technology and the other using reectance photometry to produce results in minutes. e procedure manuals for each test provide guidance on proper specimen collection, handling, and quality control (QC) mea­sures. Variants, including day- to- day or seasonal variations, can contribute to the accuracy of a cholesterol level.
41,42
Common variants to consider in interrupting the POC test results include age, gender, diet and alcohol, exercise, medications, fasting, and pregnancy.
41,42
Blood Chemistries
Use in Pharmacy
A wide variety of CLIA- waived POCT devices measure blood chemistry in an outpatient setting. A blood chemistry analyzer uses a whole blood sample and can measure analytes, including ionized calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, sodium, and urea nitrogen. In addition, some CLIA­waived blood chemistry analyzers measure other analytes, including alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino trans­ferase, albumin, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and total protein. Blood chemistry analyzers with these analytical capa­bilities can be used by a pharmacist practicing under a CPA or CDTM provisions in state regulations or statutes to determine liver and renal function values and assist with any appropriate medication dosing adjustments for chronic conditions, such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease.
Many medications are used in the management of chronic diseases that can lead to electrolyte imbalances. Additionally, most medications’ pharmacokinetics are impacted by renal and/or liver function. Blood chemistry panels, such as a com­plete metabolic panel, can assist pharmacists in understanding a patient’s renal and liver function to adjust or monitor the safety of these medications. CLIA- waived POC platforms for blood chemistries have multiple panels, not all of which are CLIA­waived. Measuring blood chemistries in real time can enable the pharmacist to adjust the medications accordingly. It is important that pharmacists understand the performance characteristics of these tests, reference guidelines, and ranges when discussing results and determining the appropriate time to refer patients to their primary care provider.
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
Patients under the supervision of a pharmacist for chronic disease management (eg, hypertension, diabetes) require routine blood chemistry monitoring to ensure the safety and ecacy of their medications. Pharmacists should consult relevant national
-
guidelines and perform necessary basic assessments to deter­mine when to use these tests in the appropriate patient.
Application of Blood Chemistries Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
Many medications on the market require renal or hepatic dosing adjustments as a patient’s renal or liver function declines. Assessing a patient’s renal and hepatic function at the POC allows a phar­macist with a CPA/CDTM agreement to adjust the medication dose or modify a patient’s treatment to provide safe pharmacologi­cal treatment.43 Several chronic disease medications (eg,diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors) can impact a patient’s electrolytes. To safely start and modify these medications, it is essential to assess the patient’s electrolytes before and aer. Using POCT to monitor the electrolytes allows the pharmacist to make real-
time decisions and adjust medications accordingly.
Performance Characteristics
CLIA- waived POC tests for blood chemistries analyze whole blood samples collected through venipuncture or nger stick, depending on the analyzer and analytes being tested. Analyz­ers can provide results within minutes from a few drops of blood. To produce readable results, the analyzer conducts chemical reactions between the whole blood and the chemical reagents provided to produce chromophores, which are then measured through photometry. Using absorbed wavelengths, the analyzer can determine the concentration of the desired analyte. In general CLIA- waived POC tests for blood chemis­tries meet established thresholds for total allowable error for most analytes.44 However, in dierent settings, analytes such as sodium, glucose, calcium, and others may demonstrate signi­cant bias, compared with reference methods.44 Reasons for the bias include dierences in analytical methods used by the CLIA­waived POC test and the comparator or improper sample collec­tion technique (eg, failure to properly clean the ngertip prior to obtaining capillary blood).
44,45
Urinalysis
Use in Pharmacy
e urine dipstick and tablet reagent urinalysis are common CLIA- waived POC tests found in many outpatient settings. Urinalysis screens for a variety of dierent diagnostics (eg, urinary tract infection, pregnancy) and assists in the manage­ment of chronic diseases (eg, glucose, ketones, albumin to creati­nine ratio). With a CPA/CDTM agreement, pharmacists provide nonpharmacological treatment and antibiotic treatment for a urinary tract infection identied through a CLIA- waived POC urinalysis. Additionally, pharmacists use urinalysis to assess patients with diabetes through monitoring glucose, albumin, and ketones in the urine, providing guidance on adherences and ecacy of medication(s).
60 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
When considering incorporating urinalysis into the pharmacy workow, the location for obtaining a urine sample will deter­mine the site’s ability to use these POC tests. e site needs to ensure a private area to obtain a urine specimen while ensuring the accuracy of the sample.
Application of Urinalysis Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
A variety of urinalysis POC tests allow pharmacists to screen for and manage a variety of conditions and disease states. e urinalysis test provides pharmacists with values for biliru­bin, glucose, Hgb, ketone, leukocytes, nitrite, pH, protein, and specic gravity. is test can be used to detect an acute urinary tract infection. Additional POC testing for urine albumin concentration or albumin to creatinine ratio for identication of microalbuminuria can assist the pharmacist in the manage­ment of diabetes or hypertension.24 Pharmacists involved with prescribing or administering birth control may benet from urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) testing to deter­mine a patient’s pregnancy status. Outpatient monitoring for proteinuria for pregnant patients during routine prenatal care may aid in identifying patients at risk for preeclampsia.
24,46
e pharmacist involved in a smoking cessation program might use a nicotine detection test. is test detects nicotine and its metabolites in urine and could indicate the smoking status of an individual as a low or high nicotine consumer. Additionally, urine POC tests can also be used for a variety of other screen­ing and diagnostic purposes; however, these uses are beyond the scope of this chapter. It is important that pharmacists refer­ence national disease state guidelines when discussing results and determining the appropriate time to refer patients to their primary care provider.
Performance Characteristics
Urine POCT studies are limited and, of those available, there is considerable variation in how the urine screening tests are performed: such testing is oen in conjunction with other physical assessments, the review of symptoms, and laboratory testing. e interpretation of results depends on proper collec­tion procedures and testing methods. Additionally, it is impor­tant to consider specicity and sensitivity and the NPV and PPV for the POC urine test used at the practice site because of vari­ability between devices.
11
Hepatitis C Virus
Use in Pharmacy
An estimated 2.4 million people in the United States are infected with HCV, and nearly half of infected individuals are unaware of their infection because they are asymptomatic. estimates suggest there were nearly 44,700 new infections in
2017.50 Studies demonstrate that testing adults for HCV is cost eective in a variety of outpatient pharmacy settings and can facilitate linkage to care.
51
Clinic models that are led by pharmacists or models in which
they assist in care provide accessible and eective alternatives
47-49
e CDC
for providing outpatient HCV care.52 Given the accessibility of pharmacists, training pharmacists on the application and proper use of screening for HCV with CLIA- waived POC tests can have a signicant impact on public health eorts, increasing the num­ber of people getting tested, especially those at high risk (eg, younger patients using illicit intravenous drugs) who are not receiving care.
17,53
Pharmacist- directed CLIA- waived POCT eorts can increase the linkage to care (eg, follow- up assessment with providers, medicine distribution, and access to medication assistance programs) and expand access to appropriate counsel­ing services and community resources.
17,53
Such eorts can also enhance collection of prevalence and surveillance data to help resources reach targeted at- risk populations.
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
Guidelines for HCV testing have evolved as HCV shied from a chronic infection to a curable disease. Current guidelines recommend routine, one- time testing for all adults and risk­based testing for patients younger than 18 years. Periodic repeat testing can be performed in all individuals who are at increased risk of or have been exposed to HCV. Pharmacists can identify individuals for testing based upon risk behaviors or exposures and other conditions or circumstances outlined in the national guidelines.
54
Application of Hepatitis C Virus Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
In 2013, the CDC recommended that the testing sequence for current active hepatitis C infection begin with testing for the HCV antibody, including use of the rapid POC assay prior to further HCV RNA testing and linkage to care. A positive HCV antibody test does not distinguish whether the patient currently has acute or chronic active HCV infection or a past infection that has resolved. erefore, to conrm active infection, individ­uals testing positive must have a follow- up HCV RNA PCR test to detect HCV viremia, which informs management and treat­ment decisions.54 Persons with a negative screening are consid­ered not infected and do not need further evaluation unless they have a known risk factor.54 us, CLIA- waived POCT for HCV oers potential savings in healthcare expense as well as the opportunity to educate patients on risk factors.
Performance Characteristics
Currently, there is one FDA- approved CLIA- waived POC rapid immunoassay test that detects antibodies to HCV from whole blood samples obtained either by venipuncture or nger stick.55 e results from it can be read between 20 to 40 minutes aer the analysis is started, which enables a patient to receive pretest and posttest counseling within a single visit. is test is a noninstrumented, indirect lateral ow immunoassay, and its performance characteristics are summarized in Table4-2. It has excellent sensitivity and specicity using whole blood from a nger stick.56 In a multicenter study of individuals at risk for HCV infection, the test demonstrated a clinical perfor­mance equivalent to laboratory- based tests across all specimen types.57 In addition, several studies have observed that the speci­city of the HCV rapid test with all specimen types is similar to
CHAPTER 4 • PoinT- of-CARE TEsTing 61
https://t.me/med1917
b
OVERALL
CLINICAL
SPECIFICITY (%)
b
OVERALL
CLINICAL
SENSITIVITY (%)
TIME TO
RESULTS
(MIN)
99.8 (OMT)
100 (VPWB)
HIV-1 Abs
99.3 (OMT)
99.6 (FSWB)
20
HIV-1 Abs = 99.9
HIV-1 Abs = 99.7
HIV-2 Abs = 100
99.9
HIV-1 Abs = 99.7
99.9 (OMT)
98.9 (OMT)
HIV-2 Abs = 100
25–40 (OMT)
100 (FSWB)
99.9 (VPWB)
Low risk 100
High risk 98.9
99.8 (FSWB)
99.9 (VPWB)
HIV-1 Abs = 99.9
HIV-2 Abs = 100
10–25 (FSWB)
10–25 (VPWB)
Overall 99.6
99.5
c
99.8
<2
20–40 100 100
SPECIMEN
TYPE
a
ANALYTE(S)
(TYPE OF ABS)
CLIA WAIVER
GRANTED METHOD
OMT, FSWB,
VPWB
(IgG)
June 2004 Lateral ow HIV-1/2 Abs
FSWB, VPWB 10 100 99.7
(IgG + IgM)
FSWB, VPWB 15
FSWB, VPWB 15
(IgG)
(IgG)
OMT
FSWB
(IgG)
VPWB
FSWB 20
HIV-1/2 Abs
(IgG + IgM)
FSWB
(IgG + IgM)
July 2012 Flow through HIV-1/2 Abs
VPWB
February 2011 Lateral ow HCV Abs FSWB
43,44
TEST MANUFACTURER
TABLE 4-2. Summary of CLIA-Waived POC Tests for HIV and HCV
HIV
OraSure
Technologies
OraQuick
Advance
Rapid HIV-1/2
antibody test
Trinity Biotech November 2004 Sandwich HIV-1/2 Abs
Uni-Gold
Recombigen
HIV test
1/2 Stat-Pak
Chembio March 2011 Lateral ow HIV-1/2 Abs
Sure Check
Chembio May 2006 Lateral ow HIV-1/2 Abs
Clearview HIV-
HIV-1/2
DPP HIV-1/2 Chembio December 2012 Dual path ow HIV-1/2 Abs
Abbott Laboratories December 2014 Lateral ow HIV-1 p24 Ag
43
Determine
HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab
combo test
bioLytical
Laboratories
44
INSTI HIV-1/2
antibody test
HCV
OraSure
Technologies
OraQuick rapid
antibody HCV
test
Abs = antibodies; Ag = antigen; FSWB = whole blood via nger stick; OMT = Oral mucosa transudate; VPWB = whole blood via venipuncture.
Values obtained from product package inserts and/or from manufacturers websites, except where noted.
a
Data for whole blood via nger stick unless otherwise noted, data for whole blood via venipuncture not provided.
Only HIV-1 Abs data provided.
c
b
62 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
that reported for anti-HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA).58 e CLIA- waived POC test to detect antibodies to HCV also has a high degree of interoperator agreement in result interpretation.59 For these reasons, the initial testing for HCV antibody screening with POC rapid immunoassay is an eective alternative to the third- generation EIA methods.
56
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Use in Pharmacy
Estimates suggest that nearly 1.2 million individuals in the United States are living with an HIV infection, of whom 161,800, or one in eight (13%), are unaware of their infection.60 Testing is important because individuals who are unaware of their HIV infection status cannot take advantage of treatments to reduce viral loads and maintain their health; thus, they pose a risk of transmitting the infection to others.
Given the accessibility of pharmacists and a less stigma­tizing setting, pharmacies can be eective for the delivery of HIV testing, even though they are underutilized. Data dem­onstrate that by training pharmacists to perform CLIA- waived POC tests for the screening of HIV, pharmacies can be an eec­tive setting for those who have not previously been tested and increase access to testing, particularly in underserved areas.61 HIV screening in pharmacies can have signicant impact on public health eorts to increase the number of people get­ting tested, especially those who engage in high- risk behav­iors. Pharmacist- directed CLIA- waived POCT eorts could increase the linkage to medical treatment (eg, facilitate med­icine distribution and access to medication assistance pro­grams); expand access to appropriate counseling services, community resources, and care; and aid in risk- mitigation eorts (eg, needle exchange programs). Such eorts can also enhance the collection of prevalence and surveillance data to help resources reach targeted at- risk populations quicker. Rec­ognizing these public health benets, the CDC oers a train­ing program on HIV testing in community pharmacies (https://
www.cdc.gov/hiv/eective-interventions/diagnose/hiv-testing
-in-retail-pharmacies?Sort=Title%3A%3Aasc&Intervention%20 Name=HIV%20Testing%20in%20Retail%20Pharmacies).
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
e CDC recommends that individuals aged 13 to 64 years be tested for HIV at least once as part of routine care and that indi­viduals with risk factors be tested annually.16 When perform­ing CLIA- waived POCT for HIV, refer to national guidelines to determine who should be tested.
Application of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Point­of-Care Testing in Practice
Studies show that the accessibility of community pharmacies can be leveraged to successfully oer CLIA- waived POCT services for HIV infection. POCT services for HIV in a pharmacy practice setting requires a modest amount of sta training, and the costs are similar to other services oered in these settings. studies indicate pharmacies can serve as an alternate, highly
18,61-66
Moreover, establishing CLIA- waived
16
16
18,63,64,66
Collectively,
accessible, and less stigmatizing healthcare facility to perform HIV testing services.
18,62-66
Approximately 1 week is needed for viral infection and replication to produce detectable p24 antigen, which is the rst viral protein that can be measured aer HIV infection. is antigen is then detectable for approximately 1 to 8 weeks (average within 2 weeks), until there is sucient antibody production to bind and neutralize it. On average, the onset of symptoms occurs within 1 to 3 weeks of infection and corresponds to seroconversion (ie, the development of antibod­ies). Seroconversion occurs in most individuals within 4 weeks of potential exposure (ie, infection). Individuals who have not seroconverted by 4 weeks should do so by 12 weeks postexpo­sure. At that point, if seroconversion has not occurred (ie, the test result is negative), the individual is considered HIV negative.
Performance Characteristics
ere are several CLIA- waived POC tests to detect antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 and one test that detects those antibodies plus HIV-1 p24 antigens. Following specimen collection, the time to test results for HIV POC tests ranges from 1 minute to 20 minutes, which enables a patient to receive pretest and posttest counseling within a single visit. ese test devices are typically based on a capillary lateral ow design and use whole blood from a nger stick or oral mucosal transudate. e perfor­mance characteristics of these tests are summarized in Table4-2.
e performance characteristics of the CLIA- waived POC tests for HIV are sucient to detect HIV infection or its absence. In general, the CLIA- waived POC tests for HIV have specic­ity and sensitivity equivalent to nonwaived HIV screening test kits (eg, ELISA) approved for laboratory use.67 e performance characteristics of CLIA- waived POC tests for HIV vary depend­ing on the type of test (eg, antigen or antibody- based), whether it detects only one type of immunoglobulin (ie, IgG) or more (ie, IgM and IgG) antibodies, the stage of infection, whether the analyte has achieved measurable concentrations to give a posi­tive result (ie, the window period), and the type of specimen (eg, whole blood or oral mucosal transudate) being analyzed. Acute HIV infection (ie, the period from infection to seroconversion) is dicult to detect with CLIA- waived POC tests because HIV antibody titers are typically low in this stage of HIV infection. us, these tests have lower sensitivity than the nonwaived laboratory- based ELISAs and automated systems for detecting seroconversion.67 is means the window period may be lon­ger for CLIA- waived POC tests for HIV compared with a non­waived test performed in a laboratory. According to the CDC, laboratory- based antigen/antibody tests can detect HIV infec­tion from venous blood within 18 to 45 days postexposure; the CLIA- waived POC counterpart does so within 18 to 90 days.68 Tests using oral mucosal transudate are highly accurate but have even lower sensitivity for detecting seroconversion than those using serum, plasma from venous blood, or whole blood from a nger stick because the antibody concentration found in oral mucosal transudate is lower. that measure HIV antibody in oral mucosal transudate oen fail to detect acute HIV. tion to antibodies for HIV-1 and HIV-2, the marketed combi­nation CLIA- waived POC test should allow for the detection of
69,70
us, CLIA- waived POC tests
67,70
By measuring p24 antigen in addi-
CHAPTER 4 • PoinT- of-CARE TEsTing 63
https://t.me/med1917
acute infection.71 However, to date, the test does not detect p24 antigen with a high sensitivity; thus its accuracy for detecting acute infection is poor as well.
72,73
In addition to stage of infec­tion, HIV prevalence in the population being tested can impact the oral tests.69 In high- prevalence settings, the PPVs for either whole blood or oral mucosal transudate are similar; however, in low- prevalence settings, PPVs are much higher for whole blood than oral mucosal transudate specimens.70 CLIA- waived POC HIV testing will involve an initial HIV test and, if it is reactive, a follow- up HIV test in a moderate to high complexity laboratory. A negative test result in someone aer a potential HIV expo­sure should be repeated aer the window period, approximately 12weeks aer the potential exposure.
68
Influenza A and B
Use in Pharmacy
e annual burden of inuenza in the United States uctuates markedly depending on a variety of variables. According to CDC estimates, each year since 2010, inuenza infects between 9 and 45 million individuals and results in 140,000 to 810,000 hospitalizations and up to 61,000 deaths.74 Inuenza occurs seasonally and produces symptoms that are oen indistin­guishable from bacterial respiratory infections. Moreover, the prompt initiation of appropriate cost- eective antiviral therapy is key to hastening the resolution of the infection and limiting its severity.
Using CLIA- waived POC tests to screen for inuenza repre­sents a collaborative opportunity for pharmacy and local health departments to improve data sharing that informs disease sur­veillance eorts.75 In some cases, such eorts can be combined with technological solutions to improve vaccine and antiviral distribution and perhaps even curtail inappropriate antibacte­rial use. In addition, POCT for inuenza can assist with eorts to distinguish between inuenza and COVID-19.
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
e CDC has published useful algorithms to guide interpre­tation of CLIA- waived POC tests for inuenza and clinical decision- making when influenza activity in the commu­nity is high (https://www.cdc.gov/u/professionals/diagnosis
/algorithm- results- circulating.htm) or low (https://www .cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/algorithm- results- not
- circulating.htm).76 To determine if a patient is an appropriate
candidate for testing, pharmacists should perform an appropri­ate physical assessment to determine if the patient has symptoms consistent with an acute respiratory disease that began within several days of patient presentation. Accordingly, CLIA- waived POCT for inuenza should be performed using a highly sensi­tive and specic test during the inuenza season when the disease prevalence is high.76 Pharmacy researchers developed a physician–pharmacist collaborative management model for inuenza based largely on the CDC principles.77 In that model, pharmacists in a community practice setting provided CLIA­waived POCT services for inuenza by screening adult patients for symptoms of an inuenza- like illness and using proper nasal swab specimen collection technique to obtain a sample.77
ePPV of the tests was maximized by performing these activi­ties only when local inuenza activity had been documented by state or federal surveillance and by performing a physical assess­ment and assessing vital signs (eg, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation).77 Only 11% of patients with an inuenza- like illness had a positive result. Moreover, because the CPA prevented pharmacists from dispensing oseltamivir or antibacterial therapy to patients who tested negative, the study demonstrated that this practice model can lead to rational use of antivirals and avoid the overuse of unnecessary antimicrobial therapy.
77
To determine whether inuenza is present in a specic patient population and assist providers in diagnosing and treat­ing acute respiratory illnesses, the CDC also recommends that CLIA- waived POCT be done during an acute outbreak of a respiratory disease and in patients with clinical signs and symp­toms of inuenza during the inuenza season.
76
Application of Influenza A and B Point- of-Care Testing in Practice
Studies demonstrate that protocol driven CLIA- waived POCT for inuenza using antigen or molecular tests can be success­fully implemented in the outpatient setting, particularly in community pharmacies.
77-80
ese services increase access to care outside of normal clinic hours for patients regardless of their insurance status or whether they have a primary care provider.
77-80
In addition, such services provide patients appro­priate therapy without promoting the overuse of antibiotics.78 By oering CLIA- waived POCT services for inuenza in the outpatient setting, pharmacists can also collaborate with public health agencies to improve seasonal surveillance eorts and reduce inappropriate antibacterial use in respiratory illnesses during the inuenza season.
2,75,81
Performance Characteristics
e results of antigen or molecular CLIA- waived POC tests for inuenza depend on viral load, which is inuenced by several variables, including patient age and the timing of sample collec­tion relative to symptom onset. Pharmacists should recognize that viral loads are higher in samples obtained from infected children than those obtained from infected adults. us, when evaluating literature to select a test with appropriate perfor­mance data for their patients, pharmacists should be aware that performance data are typically better when the tests are performed using samples from infected children than samples from infected adults.19 In addition, viral shedding peaks 24 to 72 hours aer symptoms begin. is time interval represents the ideal window to achieve optimal test performance. erefore, when assessing whether a patient is an appropriate test candi­date, pharmacists should establish when symptom onset began. Other variables that pharmacists cannot mitigate that inuence viral load (and therefore may aect test performance) include the viral strain, materials used to collect the sample, type of specimen, and, in the case of antigen tests, the volume of viral transport media used in test.19 In addition, regardless of method, the performance characteristics of these tests can be aected by annual genomic dris or a shi when it occurs.
82,83
64 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
Historically, CLIA- waived POC tests for inuenza virus nucleoprotein antigen have been chromatographic lateral ow immunoassays. Such tests oen lacked sensitivity for a variety of reasons, including being based upon immunochromatographic methodology that did not amplify the target antigen and relying on visual detection.19 However, since 2015, several technologi­cal and regulatory developments have led to improvements in the sensitivity of CLIA- waived POC tests for inuenza in gen­eral. First, with the advent of isothermal nucleic acid ampli­cation methods that enable rapid detection of DNA/RNA, the rst molecular test for inuenza was authorized by the FDA in 2015.84 en, in 2017, the FDA reclassied these tests from classI to class II devices.85 is reclassication enabled the FDA to impose more rigorous performance thresholds for the antigen tests in 2018. According to the new thresholds, existing and new antigen tests must achieve sensitivity of at least 80% compared with a molecular test and 80% to 90% when compared with viral culture.85 Tests that could not meet the performance standards are no longer available in the United States.
e performance characteristics of marketed antigen and molecular CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests are summarized in Table4-3. e antigen CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests are simple to use and provide results within 15 minutes. e tests dier in terms of simple sample processing prior to test, incuba­tion and run times, and throughput capacity.86 Most tests now use automated, rather than visual, detection to improve sensitiv­ity and performance to meet the FDA thresholds. As stated pre­viously, antigen tests have lower sensitivities to detect inuenza viruses in respiratory specimens than molecular tests.
82,83
us, negative results of antigen CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests should not be used to exclude a diagnosis of inuenza.
82,83
For this reason, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends the use of molecular CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests rather than antigen CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests for the detection of inuenza viruses in respiratory specimens of outpatients.
Molecular CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests use dier­ent amplication methods, including isothermic nucleic acid amplication, RT-PCR, and one that uses RT-PCR followed by hybridization to allow for qualitative to be read visually.19 Unlike antigen CLIA- waived POC inuenza tests, molecular tests use samples that require no manipulation (ie, addition of buers). Molecular tests produce results within 15 to 30 minutes depending on the amplication method. In general, sensitivi­ties of available molecular CLIA- waived POC tests range from 66% to 100%.
82
Group A Streptococci
Use in Pharmacy
Pharmacists can use POC tests for GAS to assist in the acute management of infected patients. of adult acute pharyngitis and 15% to 30% of acute pharyngitis among children.90 Epidemiologically, GAS pharyngitis occurs primarily in the winter and early spring and aicts individuals in a narrow age range. Clinically, GAS pharyngitis has a well­recognized presentation and rarely requires conrmation by
78-80,87-89
GAS causes 5% to 10%
culture, but its symptoms are oen indistinguishable from viral respiratory tract infections. Data from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom demonstrate that CLIA- waived POC tests for GAS improve access to care and help ensure that appro­priate antibiotic therapy is initiated if warranted, which could hasten infection resolution by 1 to 2 days.
78-80,87-89
Determining Appropriate Testing Candidates
GAS is the most common bacterial cause of acute sore throat, but it is dicult to accurately diagnose it as a cause of pharyngitis.91 On the basis of clinical manifestations alone, GAS pharyngitis is oen indistinguishable from viral respiratory tract infections.
91,92
In contrast, to adults, GAS pharyngitis is more common than viral etiologies among children and adolescents (Minicase 2). erefore, to aid in the identication of patients with pharyngitis who have a high likelihood of GAS infection, additional strate­gies are needed. Performing an appropriate physical exam and applying its results using a validated, age- based clinical predic­tion rule, such as the Modied Centor Criteria Score, can further assist in identifying patients with pharyngitis who would benet most from CLIA- waived POCT for GAS.93 Originally developed in 1981, the Modied Centor Criteria Score was based on the presence of tonsillar exudates, swollen tender anterior cervical nodes, fever, and the lack of cough and was used to estimate the probability of acute GAS pharyngitis in adults with a sore throat.93 e score was later modied by adding age to the criteria and validated in a large study of adults and children.94 e Modied Centor Criteria Score ranges from 1 to 5, with testing for GAS recommended in patients with a score of 2 or higher.92 However, even when using this clinical prediction rule, there is limited success in accurately diagnosing GAS pharyn­gitis because at the highest Modied Centor Criteria Scores (eg, 4), it only helps identify 53% of patients with GAS phar-
91-95
yngitis.
e Modied Centor Criteria and their interpreta­tion are summarized in Table4-4. In a pilot study, pharmacy researchers developed a physician–pharmacist collaborative management model for GAS based largely on these principles.87 In that model, pharmacists in a community practice setting used the Modied Centor Criteria to screen 316 patients, of whom 273 were eligible for testing. Only 48 patients (17.5%) had a positive test result and received amoxicillin or azithromycin per their CPA. is pilot project demonstrated that such a practice model can dramatically reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use in the community practice setting.87 Like inuenza, these results were validated by several studies, including one that used a molecular test, in a variety of community pharmacy settings, in multiple states, and several countries.
78-80,87-89
Application of Group A Streptococci Point- of-Care in Practice
Performance characteristics of current CLIA- waived POC tests for GAS are suciently robust: the current guidelines do not recommend any additional conrmatory tests for adults when results are negative. Although conrmatory testing is currently recommended when CLIA- waived POC test results are negative in children and adolescents, data suggest that such follow- up testing may not be necessary.
91,96
CHAPTER 4 • PoinT- of-CARE TEsTing 65
https://t.me/med1917
a,b
i
h,i
h
OVERALL
ACCURACY (%)
A/B
NPV (%)
A/B
PPV (%)
A/B
OVERALL
CLINICAL
SPECIFICITY (%)
A/B
91/99
h
91.7/99.0
h
89.7/100
g
95.6/100
92.2/98.2
i
95.1/98.9
i
83/94.4
i
94.7/99.4
94.5/97.3
h,i
95.6/98.0
h,i
90/89.9
g,i
NPSh95/96
NSh94/95
NPSh99/98
NSh97/98
NPSh75/84
h
NS
82/81
NPS
95/97
h,i
96.1/95.6
h,i
77.7/84.2
h,i
87.4/89.0
i
96.0/98.1
h,i
97.0//97.9
h,j
97.6/100
h,i
95.3/81.5
Data not provided
NPS
i
98.5/97.7
NS
98.2/
99.6
97.6/
99.3
i
NS, NPS 15 84.3/89.5
f,i
81.5/80.9
10
NS, NPS
d
f
OVERALL
CLINICAL
SENSITIVITY (%)
A/B
TIME TO
RESULTS
(MIN)
SPECIMEN
TYPE
NPS 10 81.3/77.8
c
NPS
NS, NPS 3–15 NS
97/90
90/89
c,e
i
NPS, NS 15 96.4/82.3
NPS
i
92.8/100
<15
97.6/
97.3
98.9/
98.4
97/94 94/99 83/90 76.3/89.3 95/98
<30
100/100 96.8/94.1 Data not provided
<30
97/94 94/99 82/90 99/99 94.5/98.2
<30
NS
TABLE 4-3. Summary of Performance Characteristics for CLIA-Waived POC Tests for Inuenza A and/or B
TEST (MANUFACTURER)
Antigen-Based Tests
BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection
of Flu A+B (Becton Dickinson)
BinaxNOW Inuenza A&B Card with
QuickVue Inuenza A+B Test
Digival 2 (Abbott Laboratories)
(Quidel Corporation)
Soa Inuenza A+B
(Quidel Corporation)
Acucy Inuenza A&B Test
(Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC)
Molecular TestsjID NOW Inuenza A & B 2 (Abbott) NPS, NS
Xpert Xpress Flu (Cephid) NPS, NS 20–30 NS
AcculaTM Flu (Mesa Biotech) NS
Cobas RInuenza A/B Assay (Roche) NPS
Silaris Inuenza A/B
(Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC)
Data for nasal aspirate/nasal wash not included.
Values obtained from product package inserts and/or from manufacturers websites.
A = inuenza virus A; B = inuenza virus B; NPS = nasopharyngeal swab; NS = nasal swab.
a
b
Does not distinguish between inuenza A and B virus infections when used alone.
Requires separate analyzer or reader device.
c
d
e
Values taken from 2 × 2 table of results in package insert.
Values represent negative percent agreement.
Immunouorescence assay.
Values represent positive percent agreement.
f
Clinical study included both specimen types.
g
h
i
j
Includes only tests that detect inuenza A and/or B, not other respiratory pathogens.