Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2754_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
306 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 14-2. Flow- volume curves seen with obstructive and restrictive pulmonary diseases. This gure illustrates
the ow- volume curves observed for normal adults: obstructive, restrictive, and mixed disease. Flow- volume curve
number 1 represents baseline spirometry. Flow- volume curve number 2, if present, is a repeat of the spirometry after a bronchodilator is administered. (Refer to bronchodilator studies under Bronchodilator Responsiveness Test.) The curve with the vertical lines represents the predicted normal values. In these examples, there is no improvement in
the ow- volume curves after bronchodilator administration. The normal ow- volume curve shows that the curve is
larger than expected based on predicted values and is, therefore, normal. Concavity of the expiratory portion of the
curve, consistent with limitation in ow compared with the predicted, is illustrated in the airow limitation ow­volume curve. The restriction ow- volume curve shows a FVC that is smaller than expected. The predicted volume is approximately 3 L; however, the patient’s FVC is 2 L. In restriction, although the forced expiratory ows are often decreased, there is no concavity such as seen in the airow limitation curve. It is important to note that spirometry does not diagnose restriction. The ow- volume loop demonstrates ndings such as this consistent with restriction; however, lung volumes are needed to dene restriction. Concavity in the expiratory phase and a decreased FVC volume is consistent with a combination of an airow limitation and restriction ow- volume curve.
CHAPTER 14 • PulmonARy FunCTion And RElATEdTEsTs 307
https://t.me/med1917
maintaining an upright posture, until all the air is exhaled. e patient is then instructed to inspire with maximal eort until completely full. is maneuver can be repeated up to eight times in adults if needed to meet testing standards.
Like most medical tests, spirometry has seen changes over the years in equipment, computer support, and recommenda­tions for standardization. In an eort to maximize the usefulness of spirometry results, the American oracic Society (ATS), in conjunction with the European Respiratory Society (ERS), developed standardizations of spirometry testing.
3,4
These recommendations are intended to decrease the variability of spi­rometry testing by improving the performance of the test. e recommendations cover equipment, quality control, the train­ing and education of people conducting the test, and the train­ing of patients performing the test. e recommendations also provide criteria for acceptability and usability of the patient’s spirometry eorts and guidelines on interpreting the spirometry test results. For acceptability and usability of both the FEV1 and FVC results, three criteria must be met. e rst criterion is the back- extrapolated volume (BEV), which must be ≤5% of the FVC or 0.100 L, whichever is greater. BEV is the volume of gas exhaled before the start of forced expiration. e BEV would be too high if a patient leaked out air before maximal exhalation. Spirometers show the BEV calculation. e second criterion is the measurement must have no evidence of a faulty zero- ow setting, or airow through the mouthpiece sensor before the start of the test. Newer spirometers use technology to detect this error and alert the user. e last criterion is there must be no glottic closure in the rst second of expiration. Glottic closure appears like a at line on the volume- time graph and shows a stop in airow. Because the results of spirometry depend on the patient’s eort, at least three acceptable eorts are obtained with a goal of having the two highest measurements of FVC and FEV1 vary ≤0.150L if the patient’s age is >6 years and FVC and FEV1 vary ≤0.100L or 10% of the highest value, whichever is greater for patients 6 years of age and younger.
4
Bronchodilator Responsiveness Test
One of many tests that may be useful in the diagnostic workup of asthma is spirometry with bronchodilator responsiveness to assess airow variability. Before the testing day, the patient is asked to hold short- acting β2- agonists (SABA) for at least 4 hours; twice daily long- acting β2- agonists (LABA) for at least 12 hours and once- daily LABA for at least 24 hours; and ultra-LABA for 36hours and long- acting muscarinic antagonists for 48 hours.4 Spi­rometry is performed at baseline and then again 15 to 30 min­utes aer the administration of an inhaled SABA. A positive bronchodilator response is dened as an improvement of the postbronchodilator FEV1 and FVC by at least 12% and 200 mL from the prebronchodilator measurement.7 e Global Initiative for Asthma denes airway reversibility in adults as an increase in FEV1 of at least 12% and 200 mL from the prebronchodilator measurement, with more condence of a positive test with an increase in FEV1 of at least 15% and 400 mL from baseline. For children, an increase of at least 12% of predicted for the FEV1
is considered positive.6 Minicase 1 illustrates how spirometry is used to conrm COPD and how the bronchodilator reversibility study is useful for diagnosing asthma.
Peak Expiratory Flow
e peak expiratory ow (PEF) is measured with a simple, inex­pensive hand- held peak ow meter that can be used at a patient’s home, in the clinician’s oce, or in the emergency department. Because PEF measures airow through the upper airway over a shorter time and readings can vary depending on the patient’s eorts and meter type, it is not the preferred test to detect air­ow limitation.
When spirometry is not available, PEF can be used to help diagnose asthma by assessing diurnal variability. ability is indicative of asthma when the diurnal variability is >10% aer 1 to 2 weeks in adults and >13% for children.6 One can calculate diurnal variability by dividing [day’s highest PEF minus day’s lowest PEF] by the mean of these two values and then averaging these daily variability results over 1 week.9 Twice­daily PEF is measured in the morning before using inhalers and in the aernoon or evening. Variability decreases aer about 3months of use an inhaled corticosteroid.
Peak ow meters are designed for both pediatric and adult patients with PEFR between 60 and 400 L/min for children and between 60 and 850 L/min for adults. PEFR is measured by hav­ing a patient perform the following steps:
1. Stand up.
2. Move the indicator on the peak ow meter to the end near-
est the mouthpiece.
3.
Hold the meter and avoid blocking the movement of the indi-
cator and the holes on the end of the meter.
4.
Take a deep breath in and then seal the mouth around the
mouthpiece.
5.
Blow out into the meter as hard and as fast as possible without
coughing into the meter (like blowing out candles on a cake).
6. Examine the indicator on the meter to identify the number
corresponding to the peak ow measurement.
7.
Repeat the test two more times (remembering to move the
indicator to the base of the meter each time).
8.
Record the highest value of the three measurements in a
diary (readings in the morning and aernoon are ideal).
To establish a patient’s personal best peak ow rate, measure the peak ow rate over a 2- week period when asthma symp­toms and treatment are stable. e highest value over the 2- week period is the personal best. Using the individual patient’s per­sonal best peak ow instead of predicted peak ow values is con­sidered best practice. Asthma patients typically have lower peak ow readings than the healthy population, and using predicted values may result in overtreatment.
Using PEF for long- term monitoring is helpful for patients who have sudden asthma exacerbations or severe asthma. Improved asthma outcomes have been seen in asthma action plans, including personal best PEF. PEF is also helpful for
6,8
Diurnal vari
-
308 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
MINICASE 2
Six-Minute Walk Test
Charles O. is a 65- year- old man diagnosed with World Health Organization group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension after completing a right-
heart catheterization. He reports a persistent
room in his home with use of oxygen via nasal cannula at 6 L/min with exertion only. His medications were changed 6 months ago because he was experiencing side effects.
and progressive dyspnea on exertion with walking from room to
Tes t 1. Baseline
HEART RATE
SpO2 (%)
(beats/min)
Baseline on room air 89 69 100/69 Room air
Baseline on supplemental oxygen
Minute 1 90 96 Room air
Minute 2 86 104 Room air
Minute 3 83
85
109 112
Minute 4 89 114 6 L/min O
Minute 5 89 115 6 L/min O
Minute 6 90 115 104/69 6 L/min O
Recovery 2nd minute 89 65 106/75 Room air
BLOOD PRESSURE (mm Hg)
SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN (L/min)
2 L/min O 4 L/min O
NC
2
NC
2
NC
2
NC
2
NC
2
Distance walked 274.3 m
Number of rests 0
Borg scale self- rate Pretest Posttest
Dyspnea 2 5
Fatigue 2 5
NC = nasal cannula.
Tes t 2. 6 Months Later
HEART RATE
SATURATION (%)
(beats/min)
Baseline on room air 90 81 109/78 Room air
Baseline on supplemental oxygen
Minute 1 91 88 Room air
Minute 2 88 103 Room air
Minute 3 86 113 3 L/min O
Minute 4 88 115 4 L/min O
Minute 5 90 116 6 L/min O
BLOOD PRESSURE (mm Hg)
SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN (L/min)
NC
2
NC
2
NC
2
CHAPTER 14 • PulmonARy FunCTion And RElATEdTEsTs 309
https://t.me/med1917
MINICASE 2 (cont’d)
Tes t 2. 6 Months Later
HEART RATE
SATURATION (%)
Minute 6 90 118 108/81 6 L/min O
Recovery 2nd minute 90 70 112/79 Room air
Distance walked 320 m
Number of rests 0
Borg scale self-
Dyspnea 2 3
Fatigue 2 4
NC = nasal cannula.
QUESTION: Do the results from this patient’s 6- month 6MWT show
an improvement in distance walked after his medications were changed?
DISCUSSION: According to the first 6MWT, the patient walked
274.3 meters. He required 6 L/min of oxygen with exercise. The patient’s distance walked was 48% of the LLN. The patient became tachycardic with exertion, which improved after a 2- minute recovery
rate Pretest Posttest
(beats/min)
period. The results of the second 6MWT show the patient walked for 320m with no rests. The patient required 6 L/min supplemental oxygen with exertion. Comparing his 6MWT after starting the new medication regimen, the patient’s 6- minute walk distance improved by 45.7m and his oxygen requirement remained unchanged. A distance greater than a 30­important.20 The patient has improved with the medication change.
BLOOD PRESSURE (mm Hg)
m walk is considered clinically
SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN (L/min)
NC
2
identifying environmental and occupational asthma trig­gers along with dierentiating between asthma and anxiety symptoms.
6
Body Plethysmography
Body plethysmography is a method used to obtain lung volume measures. Lung volume tests indicate the amount of gas contained in the lungs at the various stages of ination. e lung volumes and capacities may be obtained by several methods, including body plethysmography, gas dilution, and imaging techniques.10 Dierent methods can have small but signicant eects on the values reported. Gas dilution methods only measure ventilated areas, whereas body plethysmography measures both ventilated and nonventilated areas. erefore, body plethysmography values may be larger in patients with nonventilated or poorly ventilated lung areas. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging can estimate lung volumes with additional detail of the lung tissue. Because body plethysmography is the most used method, this technique is discussed in more detail.
In body plethysmography, a patient sits in an airtight box and is told to inhale and exhale to functional residual capacity (FRC), or the volume of gas remaining at the end of a normal breath. Inside, a mouthpiece contains a pressure transducer. is is done to measure the change in pressure within the box
during respiration. It senses the intrathoracic pressure gener­ated when the patient rapidly and forcefully pus against the closed mouthpiece. ese data are then placed into the equa­tion for Boyle’slaw:
P1 × V1 = P2 × V
2
where P1 is pressure inside the box in which the patient is seated (atmospheric pressure), V1 is volume of the box, P2 is intrathoracic pressure generated by the patient, and V2 is the calculated volume of the box at the end of chest expansion. e dierence between this V2 and the initial volume of the box is the change in the volume of the box which is the same as the change in the volume in the chest. Because temperature (T1 and T2) is constant throughout testing, it is not included in the calculations.
Using this change in volume in Boyle’s law again, this test provides a measure of the FRC. Once the FRC is determined, the other lung volumes and capacities can be calculated based on this FRC and volumes obtained in static spirometry. Aer these data are generated, the patient’s plethysmography results are usually compared with references from a presumed normal population. is comparison necessitates the generation of pre­dicted values for that patient if he or she were completely normal and healthy. rough complex mathematical formulas, sitting
310 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
and standing height, age, sex, race, barometric pressure, and altitude are factored in to give predicted values for the pulmo­nary functions being assessed. e patient’s results are compared with the percentage of predicted values based on the results of these calculations.
Lung Volumes and Lung Capacities
Lung volumes include tidal volume (TV), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), and residual volume (RV). ese four volumes in various combinations make up lung capacities, which include inspiratory capacity, FRC, SVC, and total lung capacity (TLC).
Tidal Volume, Functional Residual Capacity, Expiratory Reserve Volume, and Residual Volume
e tidal volume is the amount of air inhaled and exhaled at rest in a normal breath. It is usually a small proportion of the lung volume and is infrequently used as a measure of respira­tory disease. e IRV is the volume measured from the “top” of the TV (ie, initial point of normal exhalation) to the maximal inspiration. During exhalation, the ERV is the volume from the “bottom” of the TV (ie, initial point of normal inhalation) to maximal expiration. e RV is the volume of air le in the lungs at the end of forced expiration to the bottom of ERV. Without the RV, the lungs would collapse like deated balloons. In diseases characterized by airow limitation that trap air in the lungs (eg, COPD), the RV increases and the patient is less able to mobilize trapped air out of the lung. ese four lung volumes are depicted in Figure14-3.
Inspiratory Capacity, Functional Residual Capacity, Slow Vital Capacity, and Total Lung Capacity
e inspiratory capacity is the volume measured from the point of the TV at which inhalation normally begins to maximal inspira­tion, and it is a summation of TV and IRV. e functional residual
capacity is the sum of the ERV and RV, and it is the volume of gas remaining in the lungs at the end of the TV. It also may be dened as a balance point between chest wall forces that increase volume and lung parenchymal forces that decrease volume. An increased FRC represents hyperination of the lungs and usually indicates airow limitation. e FRC may be decreased in diseases that aect many alveoli (eg, pneumonia) or by restrictive changes, especially those due to brotic pulmonary tissue changes. e SVC is the volume of air that is exhaled as much as possible aer inhaling as much as possible. It is a summation of the IRV, TV, and ERV and is described in more detail in the Spirometry Mea­surements section. e total lung capacity is the summation of all four lung volumes (IRV + TV + ERV + RV). It is the total amount of gas contained in the lungs at maximal inhalation. Restrictive lung disease is dened as a TLC below the 5th percentile of nor­mal predicted value with a normal FEV1/VC ratio.
7
Diffusion Capacity Tests
Tests of gas exchange measure the ability of gases to cross (dif­fuse) the alveolar- capillary membrane and are useful in assessing interstitial lung disease.11 Typically, these tests measure the per­minute transfer of a gas, usually carbon monoxide (CO), from the alveoli to the blood. CO is used because it is a gas that is not normally present in the lung, has a high anity for Hgb in red blood cells, and is easily delivered and measured. e diusion capacity may be lessened aer losses in the surface area of the alveoli or thickening of the alveolar- capillary membrane. Mem­brane thickening may be due to inltration of inammatory cells or brotic changes. ese test results can be confounded by a loss of diusion capacity due to poor ventilation, which may be related to closed or partially closed airways (as with air­ow limitation) or to a ventilation- perfusion mismatch (as with pulmonary emboli or pulmonary hypertension). e diusion capacity of the lungs to CO can be measured by either a single­breath test or steady- state test.
Inspiratory Capacity (IC)
Vital Capacity (VC)
Total Lung Capacity (TLC)
Tidal Volume (TV)
Expiratory Reserve Volume (ERV)
Functional Residual
Capacity (FRC)
Residual Volume (RV)
Inspiratory
Reserve Volume
(IRV)
FIGURE 14-3. Lung volumes and capacities. Representation of various lung compartments based on a typical
6
spirogram. Refer to Pellegrino et al
for more information.
CHAPTER 14 • PulmonARy FunCTion And RElATEdTEsTs 311
https://t.me/med1917
In the single- breath test, the patient deeply inhales— to vital capacity— a mixture of 0.3% CO, a tracer gas such as 10% helium or 0.3% methane, and balanced air. Aer holding his or her breath for 10 seconds, the patient exhales fully, and the con­centrations of CO and helium are measured during the end of expiration (ie, alveolar ow). ese concentrations are compared with the inspired concentrations to determine the amount dif­fusing across the alveolar membrane. e mean value for CO is
disease (asbestosis and silicosis), or be induced by drugs (eg, nitrofurantoin, amiodarone, and bleomycin). alters Hgb, decreases the red blood cell Hgb concentration, or changes diusion across the red blood cell membrane may alter the DLCO. e DLCO also reects the pulmonary capillary blood volume. An increase in this volume (pulmonary edema or asthma) may increase the DLCO. Minicase 3 describes how PFTs are used to diagnose restrictive airway disease.
about 25 to 30 mL/min/mm Hg.
A normal DLCO using a cuto of the percent predicted has not been standardized but 70% to 75% if oen utilized. A nor­mal DLCO is also considered when greater than the LLN for the patient. Diusion capacity is decreased in diseases that cause alveolar brotic changes. Changes may be idiopathic, such as those seen with sarcoidosis or environmental or occupational
Specialized Tests
Bronchial Challenge Tests
Bronchial challenge tests (BCTs) are used to (1) aid in the diag­nosis of asthma when the more common tests (symptom his­tory, spirometry with reversibility) cannot conrm or reject the
MINICASE 3
Using Pulmonary Function Tests to Evaluate a Patient with Interstitial Lung Disease
Jacob K. is a 59- year- old man who presents to the medicine clinic with reports of progressive dyspnea on exertion and minimal dry cough for the past 3 months. He has a history of rheumatoid arthritis and was started on methotrexate 4 months ago. CT of the chest shows diffuse ground glass opacities consistent with active inflammation and some minimal fibrosis at the bases. He had a PFT performed over a year ago that was completely normal. A repeat PFT is ordered and includes spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity. His PFT reveals the following results and the flow- volume curve in Figure14-2 labeled “Restriction.”
QUESTION: How are these PFTs useful in the diagnosis, evaluation,
and management of this patient?
DISCUSSION: Looking at his PFT in the following table, the FVC is
56% of predicted (reduced), the FEV1 is 60% of predicted (reduced), and the FEV1/FVC ratio is 0.85 (normal). This is consistent with a restrictive pattern. A TLC is 54% of predicted (reduced), verifying a restrictive pulmonary defect, and the DLCO is 50% of predicted (normal range is ≥70–75% of predicted). These findings are helpful in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease in the setting of abnormal results on CT scan and change from previous normal spirometry. The severity of restriction can also be determined by the amount of decrease in TLC.
6
12,13
Anything that
PREBRONCHODILATOR POSTBRONCHODILATOR
PFT LLN MEASURED % PREDICTED MEASURED % CHANGE
FVC (L) 4.09 3.03 56 3.11 +2
FEV
(L) 3.10 2.48 60 2.65 +6
1
FEV
/FVC 0.82 0.85 +3
1
SVC (L) 4.09 3.06 57
TLC (L) 6.54 4.36 54
RV (L) 1.71 1.30 51
DLCO (mL/min/mm Hg) 22.06 15.99 50
He is diagnosed with methotrexate- induced lung disease. The methotrexate is discontinued, and he is treated with prednisone. After 3 months of therapy, a repeat PFT is performed. The FVC is 75% of predicted, the FEV1 is 72% of predicted, and the FEV1/FVC ratio is 0.80. The TLC has increased to 65%, and the DLCO has
increased to 60% of predicted. The repeat PFT shows that he is improved. He reports improvement in his symptoms. The follow- up PFT is used to help evaluate the response to discontinuing the offending medication and establish a new pulmonary function status.
312 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
diagnosis, (2) evaluate the eects of drug therapy on airway hyperreactivity, and (3) evaluate potential drug eectiveness. ABCT measures the reactivity of the airways to known concen­trations of agents that induce airway narrowing. Negative BCTs are useful in excluding the diagnosis of asthma more than con­rming the diagnosis when a test is positive. Using this tech­nique in research, the magnitude and duration of the eect of dierent drugs on the airways may be compared. BCTs are oen referred to as challenges because the airways are challenged with increasing doses of methacholine, a synthetic derivative of ace­tylcholine, in a protocolized manner to determine whether there is a drop in the FEV1. A decrease in the FEV1 of 20% at specied doses is considered a positive test result.14 e ERS has published guidelines for methacholine challenge testing to enhance the safety, accuracy, and validity of the test.
14
Bronchial challenge testing begins by measuring baseline spirometry parameters to ensure it is safe to conduct the test. A BCT should not be performed if the FEV1 is <60% of pre­dicted.14 Most BCTs then begin with nebulization of a solution of phosphate buered saline. is both serves as a placebo to assess the airway eect of nebulization and establishes baseline airway function from which the amount of pulmonary func­tion to be reduced is calculated. Aer each dose, spirometry eorts are performed based on ATS/ERS criteria. e challenge data are then summarized into a single number, the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1second (PD20/mcg).
For methacholine, a PD20FEV1 of <6 mcg indicates severe airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), 6–25 mcg indicates mod­erate AHR, 25–100 mcg indicates mild AHR, 100–400 mcg suggests borderline AHR, and >400 mcg is a normal AHR test and excludes asthma. During a BCT, patients may experience transient respiratory symptoms such as cough, shortness of breath, wheezing, and chest tightness. An inhaled, SABA or short- acting muscarinic antagonist may be administered to alleviate symptoms and quicken the return of the FEV1 to the baseline value. Because BCTs can elicit severe, life- threatening bronchospasm, trained personnel and medications to treat severe bronchospasm should be on hand in the testing area.
Exercise Challenge Test
e exercise challenge test is used to conrm or rule out exercise- induced bronchospasm (EIB) and to evaluate the eectiveness of medications used to treat or prevent EIB, which occurs usu­ally in patients with normal PFTs who become symptomatic with exercise. e etiology of EIB is thought to be related to the cooling and drying of the airways caused by rapid breathing during exercise.
Exercise tests are usually done with a motor- driven tread­mill (with adjustable speed and grade) or an electromagneti­cally braked cycle ergometer. Heart rate should be monitored throughout the test, nose clips should be worn, and the room air should be dry and cool to promote water loss from the airways during the exercise test. In most patients, symptoms are eec­tively blocked by use of an inhaled bronchodilator immediately before beginning exercise or other exertion causing the problem. Aer obtaining baseline spirometry, the exercise test is started
at a low speed that is gradually increased over 2 to 4 minutes until the heart rate is 80% to 90% of the predicted maximum or the work rate is at 100%. e duration of the exercise is age and tolerance dependent. Children <12 years generally take 6 min­utes, while older children and adults take 8 minutes to complete the test. Aer the exercise is completed, the patient does serial spirometry at 5- minute intervals for 20 to 30 minutes. FEV1 is the primary outcome variable. A 10% or more decrease in FEV1 from baseline is generally accepted as an abnormal response, although some clinicians feel a 15% decrease is more diagnos­tic of EIB.
15
Six-Minute Walk Test
e six- minute walk test (6MWT) is a test used to measure the distance a patient can walk on a at, hard surface in 6 minutes.16 e results of the test are used to determine if a patient requires continuous oxygen at home. e results have also been corre­lated to a patient’s quality of life and abilities to complete daily activities. e results of the 6MWT also help predict morbidity and mortality for patients with congestive heart failure, COPD, and primary pulmonary hypertension.
17-19
Pulmonary hyperten­sion studies use this test to monitor the ecacy of interventions with medications.20 Minicase 2 is an example of how a 6MWT is used to monitor a patient with pulmonary hypertension.
While performing the 6MWT, the patient is educated that the goal of the test is to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes, allowing the patient to select the intensity of exercise. Stopping and resting is allowed during the test. Reference equations for healthy adults have been published; however, large variations in the predicted values exist.21 e minimal important dierence for the 6MWT is 30 meters for adults with chronic respiratory disease.21 Continuous pulse oximetry is recommended to cap­ture the lowest arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). e lowest SpO2 is a marker for prognosis and disease severity. e test is discontinued if the SpO2 decreases to <80%. Heart rate mea­surements and heart rate recovery are recorded during the test. Poorer outcomes have been associated with reduced heart rate recovery in the rst minute aer the test. Use of the Borg scale to document dyspnea and fatigue before and aer the 6MWT has good reliability when determining exercise limitations in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Practice tests, younger age, taller height, less weight, male sex, longer corridor length, and encouragement all improve test results. Unstable angina and myocardial infarction in the past 3 to 5 days and syncope and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry ≤85% are all contraindications for performing the 6MWT.22 In practice, the 6MWT is also used to assess the amount of oxygen needed with exertion. Patients with mild- to- moderate pulmonary disease may have normal oxygen saturation at rest but poor saturation with exertion. An oxygen saturation of ≤88% indicates the need for supplemental oxygen.
Carbon Monoxide Breath Test
Carbon monoxide is a poisonous gas emitted from anything burning, including cigarette smoke. As discussed in the Dif­fusion Capacity Tests section, CO binds more readily to Hgb than oxygen, causing increased fatigue and shortness of breath.
CHAPTER 14 • PulmonARy FunCTion And RElATEdTEsTs 313
https://t.me/med1917
With a simple breath test by a handheld CO meter, the patient can see how much CO is in the body (parts per million [ppm]) and in the blood (% COHgb). In clinical studies, a result of ≤10 ppm oen denes a nonsmoker; however, in clinical prac­tice, depending on the meter used, the level is usually lower. A Cochrane Review found no signicant increase in smoking abstinence rates with CO measurements.
23
Testing exhaled CO is a simple breath test in which the patient holds his or her breath for 15 seconds and then exhales into a meter. e meter is able to indicate how much CO is in the patient’s lungs and estimate how much is attached to Hgb in the patient’s blood. e test is an objective value in which patients can visually see the eects of inhaling smoke when higher values of CO are detected. Aer 8 to 12 hours without smoking, CO levels become undetectable.
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide
Measurement of exhaled concentrations of nitric oxide is a non­invasive biomarker test of airway inammation for both diag­nosing and monitoring eosinophilic airway inammation.24 Various handheld devices using the patient’s breath are avail­able that include an electrochemical sensor to determine the exhaled nitric oxide concentration. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) results of >50 parts per billion (ppb) in adults and >35 ppb in children younger than 12 years indicate eosino­philic inammation with a high likelihood to respond to corti­costeroids and certain add- on biologic asthma treatments. a monitoring test, FENO results are best interpreted as changes from baseline for each patient rather than using population normal readings. FENO measurements have many confound­ing factors, including smoking history, age, and sex. e test should be used in context with the patient history and as a tool with other diagnostic and monitoring tests.
25,26
As
presence of obstructive lung disease. Lung volumes determine the presence of restrictive lung disease, and the diffusion capac­ity test ascertains the adequacy of gas exchange.
2.
Why is spirometry an important test in the diagnosis of COPD?
ANSWER: In COPD, postbronchodilator spirometry is necessary
to determine the presence of persistent airow limitation and
the degree of disease severity. In the absence of COPD, other causes of symptoms should be considered. Physical exam and history alone are often not adequate to detect airow limita­tion. Therefore, an objective test with spirometry is needed to
conrm a clinical suspicion.
3.
Does a signicant bronchodilator response on spirometry
testing differentiate as thma from COPD?
ANSWER: Traditionally, reversibility after bronchodilator use
was considered a criterion to differentiate asthma and COPD.
However, evidence has shown that a signicant bronchodilator
response is common in COPD as well, and this assessment is no longer used to differentiate between asthma and COPD. It is still a useful test when used in conjunction with a clinical history (eg, risk factors for COPD, presentation of shortness of breath, evidence of atopy), physical exam, and other PFTs to support a clinical suspicion of asthma and/or COPD.
4. How is restrictive lung disease diagnosed?
ANSWER: It is important to note that spirometry only can
provide evidence consistent with restrictive disease, such as a decrease in FEV1 and FVC with a normal or elevated FEV1/FVC
ratio. However, restriction is a decrease in lung volume as dened
by a decrease in the TLC, which is obtained by lung volume tests, such as body plethysmography. Test results are needed to diag­nose restrictive lung disease.
SUMMARY
is chapter discusses the importance of pulmonary function testing as it relates to the diagnosis, treatment, and monitor­ing of respiratory disease states. Aer a review of the anatomy and physiology of the lungs, the mechanics of obtaining PFTs were emphasized. By understanding these mechanics, a cli­nician can better understand the interpretation of PFTs, use ndings from dierent PFTs to help dierentiate among diag­noses, and assist in making optimal therapeutic recommen­dations. PFT results are not interpreted in isolation but need to be assessed within the context of the other ndings from the medical history and from other laboratory or clinical test results. Clearly, PFTs are an important tool to aid the clinician in decision- making.
LEARNING POINTS
1. What is a PFT?
ANSWER: A PFT is any test used to assess the function of the
lungs (eg, spirometry, body plethysmography, 6MWT). The com­ponent of the PFT to be ordered is determined by the informa­tion needed. For example, spirometry is performed to reveal the
REFERENCES
1. Milavetz G, Teresi M. Pulmonary function and related tests. In Lee M, ed., Basic Skills in Interpreting Laboratory Data, 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2004.
2. Crapo RO. Pulmonary- function testing. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(1):25-30.
PubMed
3. Culver BH, Graham BL, Coates AL, et al. American oracic Society Committee on Prociency Standards for Pulmonary Function Report. An ocial American oracic Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(11):1463-1472.PubMed
4. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update: an ocial American oracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(8):e70- e88.PubMed
5. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLDCOPD) 2022 Report. http://www
.goldcopd.org. Accessed February 1, 2022.
6. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, 2020. http://www.ginasthma.org. Accessed Aug 3, 2020.
7. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(5):948-968.PubMed
8. Dekker FW, Schrier AC, Sterk PJ, et al. Validity of peak expiratory ow measurement in assessing reversibility of airow obstruction. orax. 1992;47(3):162-166.PubMed
314 BASIC SKILLS IN INTERPRETING LABORATORY DATA
https://t.me/med1917
9. Reddel HK, Taylor DR, Bateman ED, et al. An ocial American oracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(1):59-99.PubMed
10. Wanger J, Clausen JL, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(3):511-522.PubMed
11. Graham BL, Brusasco V, Burgos F, et al. 2017 ERS/ATS standards for single- breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(1):1600016.PubMed
12. Cooper JA Jr, White DA, Matthay RA. Drug- induced pulmonary disease. Part1: cytotoxic drugs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;133(2):321-340.PubMed
13. Cooper JA Jr, White DA, Matthay RA. Drug- induced pulmonary disease. Part2: noncytotoxic drugs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;133(3):488-505.
PubMed
14. Coates AL, Wanger J, Cockcro DW, et al. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(5):1601526.PubMed
15. Parsons JP, Hallstrand TS, Mastronarde JG, et al. An ocial American oracic Society clinical practice guideline: exercise- induced bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(9):1016-1027.
PubMed
16. Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, et al. An ocial European Respiratory Society/American oracic Society technical standard: eld walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1428-
PubMed
1446.
17. Cahalin LP, Mathier MA, Semigran MJ, et al. e six- minute walk test predicts peak oxygen uptake and survival in patients with advanced heart failure. Chest. 1996;110(2):325-332.PubMed
18. Kessler R, Faller M, Fourgaut G, et al. Predictive factors of hospitalization for acute exacerbation in a series of 64 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):158-164.
PubMed
19. Kadikar A, Maurer J, Kesten S. e six- minute walk test: a guide to assessment for lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997;16(3): 313-319.PubMed
20. Klinger JR, Elliott CG, Levine DJ, et al. erapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults: update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2019;155(3):565-586.PubMed
21. Singh SJ, Puhan MA, Andrianopoulos V, et al. An ocial systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American oracic Society: measurement properties of eld walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1447-1478.PubMed
22. American oracic Society. American College of Chest Physicians, ATS/ ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:211-277.
23. Bize R, Burnand B, Mueller Y, et al. Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD004705.
PubMed
24. American oracic Society. Recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and oine measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in adults and children: 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:2104-2117.
25. Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, et al. An ocial ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(5):602-615.
PubMed
26. Global Initiative for Asthma. GINA Dicult- to- treat and severe asthma in adolescent and adult patients diagnosis and management. A GINA pocket guide for health professionals. V 2.April 0, 2019. https://
ginasthma.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/04/GINA-Severe- asthma
-Pocket-Guide- v2.0- wms-1.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2020.
15
https://t.me/med1917
Liver and Gastroenterology Tests
Paul Farkas, Joanna Sampson, Matthew
Slitzky,and Jason Altman
OBJECTIVES
After completing this chapter, the reader should be able to
Discuss how the anatomy and physiology of the liver and pancreas affect interpretation of pertinent laboratory test results
Classify liver test abnormalities into cholestatic and hepatocellular patterns and understand the approach to evaluating patients with these abnormalities
Explain how hepatic and other diseases, as well as drugs and analytical interferences, cause abnormal laboratory test results for bilirubin
Understand hepatic encephalopathy and the role of serum ammonia in its diagnosis
Discuss the laboratory test abnormalities typically associated with hemochromatosis
Design and interpret a panel of laboratory studies to determine if a patient has active, latent, or previous viral hepatitis infection
Understand the signicance and use
of amylase and lipase in evaluating abdominal pain and pancreatic disorders
Discuss the role of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease and the tests used to diagnose it
Discuss the tests and procedures used to diagnose Clostridioides difcile colitis
Hepatic and other gastrointestinal (GI) abnormalities can cause a variety of clinically signicant diseases, in part because of their central role in the body’s biochemistry. is chapter provides an introduction to common laboratory studies used to investi­gate these diseases. Studies of the liver are roughly divided into those associated with (1) synthetic liver function, (2) excretory liver function and cholestasis, (3) hepato­cellular injury, and (4) detoxifying liver function and serum ammonia. Specic tests may also be used to investigate specic disease processes, including viral hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and hemochromatosis. is chapter also covers several tests for specic nonhepatic disease processes, including pancreatitis, Helico- bacter pylori infection, and Clostridioides dicile colitis.
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE LIVER ANDPANCREAS
Liver
e liver, located in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen, is the largest solid organ in the human body. It has two sources of blood.
1.
e hepatic artery, originating from the aorta, supplies arterial blood rich in oxygen.
2.
Portal veins carry the venous blood from the intestines to the liver. ey transport absorbed toxins, drugs, and nutrients directly to the liver for metabolism.
e liver is divided into thousands of lobules (Figure15-1). Each lobule is com­prised of plates of hepatocytes (liver cells) that radiate from the central vein much like spokes in a wheel. Between adjacent liver cells formed by matching grooves in the cell membranes are small bile canaliculi. e hepatocytes continually form and secrete bile into these canaliculi, which empty into terminal bile ducts. Subsequently, like tiny streams forming a river, these bile ducts empty into larger and larger ducts until they ultimately merge into the common bile duct. Bile then drains into the gall­bladder for temporary storage or directly into the duodenum.
e liver is a complex organ with a prominent role in all aspects of the body’s biochemistry. It takes up amino acids absorbed by the intestines, processes them, and synthesizes them into circulating proteins, including albumin and clotting fac­tors. e liver is also involved in breaking down excess amino acids and processing byproducts, including ammonia and urea. e liver plays a similar role in absorb­ing carbohydrates from the gut, storing them in the form of glycogen, and releasing them as needed to prevent hypoglycemia. Most lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, including cholesterol synthesis, occurs in the liver. e liver is the primary location for detoxication and excretion of a wide variety of endogenous substances produced by the body (including sex hormones) as well as exogenous substances absorbed by the intestines (including a panoply of drugs and toxins). us, in patients with liver failure, standard dosing of some medications can lead to dangerously high serum concentrations and toxicity. e role of the liver in bilirubin metabolism is explored further later in the chapter.
DOI 10.37573/9781585286423.015
315