Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5352_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
28 Мб
Скачать
2 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
are still an interesting target for organic chemists. Although most of the beta-lactams that are used today are produced with ne biotechnology methods, there is often the need for chemical modica­tions as a result, for example, in the case of semisynthetic cephalosporins.18 In addition, fully synthetic beta-lactam antibiotics, such as aztreonam, are also used in the eld of medicine.19 On the other hand, beta-lactams have a range of medical applications that are not limited to their antimicrobial activity. For instance, derivatives of azetidinones are used to treat atherosclerosis, a condition common among the elderly. Hypercholesterolemia can be effectively treated with fully synthetic ezetimibe and other drugs that inhibit the cholesterol transporter NPC1L1.
Globally, cancer is among the leading causes of death. The growing incidence of cancer and limita­tions of conventional therapy have led to tumor recurrence and made it increasingly difcult to develop a biocompatible, eco-friendly, and cost-effective alternative strategy to combat cancer.
We have conducted synthesis and biological evaluation of diverse anticancer organic compounds. Many of these anticancer compounds are linear or cyclic in nature.
24–34
Synthesis of some of these
20–23
compounds in chiral forms is achieved by employing carbohydrates, enzymes, and asymmetric metal­assisted methods.
40–42
tures.
Some organocatalytic routes are used to synthesize molecules with antitumor properties.
35–39
Studies on physical parameters help to design potent biologically active struc-
43– 46
To accelerate the process and follow environmentally benign methods, microwave-mediated reactions are performed. and many of these are considered anticancer agents. organocatalysis are followed to prepare diverse compounds with anticancer activities.
47–60
We have shown the application of tellurium for the preparation of organic molecules,
61–72
A number of environmental methods including
73
This is all evidence that a new method needs to be developed for the preparation and modication of new biologically active compounds. As stated earlier, beta-lactam ring is considered the central motif of all the main antibiotics that are used to treat several bacterial infections, such as ampicillin and amoxicillin, in addition to other antibiotics. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of the classications, biogenesis, physical characteristics, and medicinal activities of different beta-lactams.
1.2 Monocyclic β-Lactams
As four-membered cyclic amides, monocyclic beta-lactams have a nucleus that has been modied in a number of ways which allows them to have a diverse chemical reactivity as well as target specicity. Unlike other beta-lactam families, this group of compounds consist of only the beta-lactam ring bound to a side chain, but their structures lack the thiazolidine, oxazolidine, and dihydrothiazine structures that characterize other beta-lactam families. There is an extensive history of their use based on their anti­bacterial properties, but they have recently found use in a variety of other areas as well. In most studies, monocyclic beta-lactams are identied as compounds that have antibacterial properties, while in some recent studies, monocyclic beta-lactams have been shown to have neuroprotective, anti-inammatory, anticancer, anticoagulant, and antihyperlipidemic properties.
As monocyclic beta-lactams have been used in the clinic for almost half a century, they can be con­sidered safe and nontoxic drugs due to their long history of use in the clinic. In recent years, monocyclic beta-lactams have been increasingly recognized for their nonantibiotic activities, which has led to the development of some promising new clinical candidates in the eld of neurodegenerative diseases and the treatment of hemostasis. In terms of their antibacterial activity, there is still room for improvement and a broadening of their spectrum of action, particularly in Gram-positive bacteria and PBPs that are drug-insensitive, as well as to increase the stability of their beta-lactamase enzymes.
It is known that monobactams are natural antibiotic compounds that are characterized by the presence of a monocyclic ring structure. In other words, the compounds are monocyclic, beta-lactam antibiot­ics that are produced by bacteria. It should be noted that the beta-lactam ring is not fused to another ring, contrary to what is found in most other beta-lactams.74 A group of investigators from the Squibb Institute of Medical Research and Imeda et al. discovered these compounds in 1981 as part of inde­pendent teams of investigators. There are many natural soil inhabitants that produce these monocy­clic beta-lactams, which include Chromobacterium, Agrobacterium, Gluconobacter, Flexibacter, and
3Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
Pseudomonas species that are present in the soil. These bacteria produce compounds that exhibit weak antimicrobial activity, but through the modication of the chemical side chains, it is possible to improve both the spectrum and the stability of the compounds produced by these bacteria. Only Gram-negative aerobic bacteria can be effectively treated with monobactams, for example, Neisseria and Pseudomonas. In order to treat multidrug-resistant microorganisms, the use of siderophore-conjugated monobactams is promising.
75
There is no cross-reactivity between monobactam antibiotics and penicillin, but there has been some cross-reactivity with cephalosporin antibiotics, especially ceftazidime, which has an identical side chain to aztreonam, although it is untested. The risk of seizures being triggered by monobactams is slightly lower than the risk of seizures being triggered by penicillin in patients with a history of seizures.
1.2.1 Nocardicins
In 1976, the nocardicins were identied as monobactams in a fermentation broth containing Nocardia uniformis. It has been demonstrated that the antibiotic, which can be obtained in the form of colorless
crystals, exhibits moderate antibacterial activity in vitro against a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria, including Proteus and Pseudomonas. The toxicity of this compound in laboratory animals was very low. In regard to the nocardicins (nocardicins A to G), nocardicin A (Fig u re 1.1) has been shown to be the most active. Biologically, and from a stereochemical point of view, it resembles penicillin and cephalo­sporins in many ways.
The structural differences among nocardicins can be attributed to the homoserine side chain in nocar­dicins A, B, C, and D, whereas that side chain is absent in nocardicins E, F, and G. There is also the presence of an oxime group at the C3 position of the monobactam ring in nocardicins A, B, E, and F. Nocardicins were later isolated from M. caesia, N. atra, and A. mirum.
There are a number of unicellular bacteria that produce monobactams, including those belong­ing to the Gram-positive group (Micrococcus and Staphylococcus sp.) and the Gram-negative group (Chromobacterium, Pseudomonas, and Agrobacterium species). There are some amide groups that contain sulfonic acid groups bound to the N-atom of the amide groups at the beta-lactam ring, acyl substituents at the C3 position, and, in some cases, a methoxy group at the C3 position. There is little antibacterial activity demonstrated by any of these monobactams, especially when it comes to Gram­negative bacteria.
There is no doubt that serine is the precursor of the beta-lactam ring in most of the monocyclic beta­lactams that have been studied. In unicellular bacterial monobactams, the acyl group is derived from D-glutamyl-D (or L)-alanine. Nocardicins have been the subject of the majority of biosynthetic stud­ies in the past. Incorporating the precursors into nocardicin A reveals that the compound is formed from L-serine, L-homoserine, and L-tyrosine, which are metabolized to the direct precursor, a non­proteinogenic amino acid called L-p-hydroxyphenylglycine (L-pHPG). The nocardicins G and E have been found to be precursors to the nocardicins C and A, respectively. In nocardicins E, F, and G, an S-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzyme catalyzes the addition of the homoseryl side chain to a pheno­lic group. It has been found that this enzyme (Mr 33.22 kDa) shares some homology with methyl trans­ferases in its structure. In order to purify it to homogeneity, it was subjected to afnity chromatography to S-adenosylhomocysteine and nocardicin A-agarose as separate steps. In order to clone the nat gene from the genome of N. uniformis, internal peptides were used.
FIGURE 1.1 Chemical structure of nocardicin A.
4 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
It was found that the cluster of genes involved in the biosynthesis of nocardicin was located around the nat gene. Among the ORFs encoded by this gene is one that encodes a hypothetical gene for resis­tance and nocardicin transport (nocD, which encodes an N-acetyltransferase, nocH, which encodes a membrane transport protein), as well as genes that are involved in L-pHPG biosynthesis (nocFGN) and regulation (nocR, which encodes a SARP-type regulator similar to AfsR and the putative regulator of the calcium-dependent CDA antibiotic of S. coelicolor), as well as structural genes (nat, nocA, nocB, and nocL).
Located upstream of nat are the structural genes nocA and nocB, which span about 17 kb in the noc cluster and encode two type C NRPs, 3692 amino acids and 1925 amino acids, respectively, in the noc cluster. The formation of nocardicin A requires the presence of these proteins. On the basis of the align­ment of the domains of the encoded proteins, it has been predicted that some modules are responsible for activating L-pHPG, L-serine, and L-N5-hydroxyornithine.
Furthermore, the cluster also contains genes that encode tailoring enzymes that play an important role in the modication of nocardicins. The nocL gene encodes a cytochrome P450 enzyme that is catalyzed to form the syn-congured oxime moiety of nocardicin A. When nocL is disrupted, there is a lack of production of metabolites containing the oxime moiety; however, when the null mutant is transformed with nocL, this production is restored.
There has been a report regarding the isolation method used for nocardicin A.76 It was found that the broth ltrate had the greatest level of antibiotic activity. The culture broth was ltered after the fermen­tation process had been completed using a lter aid (Radiolite). Adsorption of the active principle onto activated carbon was followed by the extraction of the active principle using acetone–water–25% aque­ous ammonia at a ratio of 100:100:1 by volume. Under reduced pressure, the extract was concentrated, and the pH of the extract was adjusted to 3.0 using cation-exchange resin (Duolite C-20, H+ form). In order to remove precipitate that appeared after acidication, ltration was used. The ltrate was then passed through a column lled with an anion-exchange resin (Duolite A-6, acetate form). Water was used to wash the column, and then the absorbate was eluted with a mixture of water–pyridine–acetic acid (100:10:1). Under reduced pressure, the active eluate was concentrated, and organic solvent extractable impurities were removed from the active eluate.
To obtain a pale brown precipitate, the active solution was adjusted to a pH of 2.5. After the precipitate was collected, it was suspended in water, and the suspension was then adjusted to a pH of 7.5 with 4 N aqueous sodium hydroxide. An anion-exchange resin column was used to pass the solution through as it was being processed. Aqueous ammonia solution was used to elute the absorbate from the column after it had been washed with water. A crystalline powder was obtained from the eluate after 4 N hydrochloric acid was added to adjust the pH to 2.5. The crude crystals were then recrystallized from acidic water after having been treated with charcoal in order to yield colorless ne needles. A yield of 3.6 grams of nocardicin A was obtained from 20 liters of a fermentation broth containing 500 micrograms per milliliter.
Nocardicin A is a colorless, crystalline powder that is soluble in alkaline solutions such as aqueous ammonia, aqueous pyridine, aqueous sodium hydroxide, and dimethyl sulfoxide, sparingly soluble in methanol and insoluble in chloroform, ethyl acetate, and ethyl ether. After 187°C, it becomes brown and then decomposes after 214–216°C.
The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of nocardicin A in 1/15 m phosphate buffer solution (pH 8.0) and in 0.1 N aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was reported. There is a shoulder at 220 nm and a maximum at 272 nm in the presence of phosphate buffer, as well as maxima at 244 nm and 283 nm in the presence of alkaline solutions.
The spectrum of its infrared absorption, measured in nujol, showed peaks at the following frequencies: 3450, 3250, 3200, 2700–2500, 1725, 1655, 1605, 1590, 1510, 1395, 1260, 1240, 1220, 1175, 1045, 930, 840, 810, and 720 cm-1.
Nocardicin A has several antibacterial properties as shown in Table 1.1. In addition to its selective anti­bacterial activity, nocardicin A also shows moderate activity against a broad range of Gram-negative bac­teria including Proteus and Pseudomonas. As far as Staphylococcus, Mycobacterium, fungi, and yeast are concerned, it has no inhibitory effect. There are no cross-resistances seen between this antibiotic and streptomycin, kanamycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, a-aminobenzyl penicillin, or cephaloridine.
1.2.2 Aztreonam
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 1.1
Antimicrobial Spectrum of Nocardicin A
MI C (mcg/m L)
Test microorganisms
C. albicans
A. niger P. chrysogenum Q-176 M. phlei 12.5 P. aeruginosa IAM-1095 S. sonnei I EW-33 0.78 3.13 S. typhi 0-901 1.56 50 P. vulgaris IAM-1025 K. aerogenes NCTC-418 1.56 200 E. coli NIHJ JC-2 1.56 100 S. hemolyticus S-23 0.2 200 D. pneumoniae III 0.2 100 S. lutea PCI-1001 0.78 6.25 B. subtilis ATCC 6633 0.39 50 S. aureus FDA 209P 0.39 800
Cephazolin Nocardicin A
>1,600 >1,600 >1,600 >1,600 >1,600 >1,600
>1,600
>100
>100
400
3.13
5Beta-Lactams
Among the various monobactam antibiotics available on the market, aztreonam (AZM) (Figure 1.2) is one of the most commonly used. The basic mononucleus of AZM contains a sulfonic acid group on the number one nitrogen, which is responsible for activating the lactam ring in the compound. It is believed that the aminothiazolyl oxime side chain at position 3 is responsible for the activity against Gram­negative bacteria. P. aeruginosa is more susceptible to the presence of the carboxyl group in the side chain. It is important to note, however, that the presence of this group has a diminished effect on the activity against Gram-positive organisms. In order for beta-lactamases to be stable, they have an alpha­methyl group at position 4.
There are several different brands of AZM available in the market, including Azactam, which is an antibiotic used to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria such as P. aeruginosa. This can include bone infections, endometritis, intra-abdominal infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and sepsis to name a few. There are several ways in which the medication can be administered: intrave­nously, intramuscularly, or by inhalation.
FIGURE 1.2 Chemical structure of aztreonam.
6 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
Despite the fact that it is resistant to some beta-lactamases, it is inactivated by extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Neither Gram-positive bacteria nor anaerobes are susceptible to this agent, making it useless for their treatment. This antibiotic has been shown to be effective against a wide variety of bac­teria, such as Citrobacter, Enterobacter, E. coli, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Proteus, and Serratia. A few of the most important medically signicant microorganisms have been shown below in terms of their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) susceptibility data. S. aureus 8 to >128 μg/mL, S. epidermi- dis 8 to 32 μg/mL, and S. pyogenes 8 to ≥128 μg/mL. AZM has been shown to have synergistic effects against P. aeruginosa in combination with arbekacin or tobramycin.
77
It has been demonstrated that AZM can be safely used in patients with allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins.78 Furthermore, it is also frequently used as an alternative to aminoglycoside antibiotics because it is not ototoxic or nephrotoxic.79 Recent studies have shown that the use of AZM in the treat­ment of infections caused by metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria has to be reconsidered. As a result, AZM is often combined with avibactam (ceftazidime/avibactam) in these situations. A combination of AZM and avibactam is undergoing phase 3 clinical trials as a combination therapy. A combination of AZM and avibactam has been shown to be effective against 80% of MBL isolates that reached a clinical infection resolution in 80% of the MBL-infected patients.
80
There have been reports of injection-site reactions, rash, and rarely toxic epidermal necrolysis associ­ated with this medication. A common side effect of the drug on the gastrointestinal tract is diarrhea, nau­sea, and vomiting. Drugs may cause eosinophilia as a side effect. There are many similarities between the action of AZM and that of penicillin. By blocking the cross-linking of peptidoglycan chains, it inhibits the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall. The penicillin-binding protein-3 has a very high afn­ity to it, while penicillin-binding protein-1a has a mild afnity to it. AZM binds very poorly to PBPs in Gram-positive bacteria and anaerobic bacteria, so it is largely ineffective against Gram-positive bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. Despite the fact that AZM is a bactericidal agent, it is less effective than some of the cephalosporins.
An FT-IR spectrum and an FT-Raman spectrum were recorded within a range of 4000–500 cm-1, and the measured values were compared with previously obtained theoretical spectra.81 As shown in Figure
1.3, the FT-IR spectrum exhibits a broader band with a peak at 3456 cm-1. According to Figur e 1.4, there is a possibility that two OH bands are caused by intramolecular interactions.
FIGURE 1.3 FT-IR spectrum of AZM molecule. Adapted with permission from Mani et al. (2023).
FIGURE 1.4 FT-Raman spectrum of AZM molecule. Adapted with permission from Mani et al. (2023).
https://t.me/med1917
7Beta-Lactams
It is possible that the results of the HOMO and LUMO analyses can be used to explain the molecular stability of the active site as well as its toxicity as a result of its electronic properties. A plot of the frontier orbital plots is shown in Figu re 1. 5. The ionization potential (I), electron afnity (A), and electronegativ­ity (χ) values of this compound are 6.053, 2.036, and 4.0445 eV, respectively. There is an overall hardness of 4.017 eV for the title compound, which is a reection of its molecular stability. AZM has a chemical potential of about 2.036 electron volts. The electrophilicity (ω) value of the AZM molecule is 0.5068 eV, indicating that it has a lower toxicity than different molecules. The chemical softness (S) of the title compound is 0.248 eV, which indicates that the title molecule is soft in terms of its chemical properties. For different solvents, the energy gap is calculated to be 4.017 eV for DMSO and 4.364 eV for acetone. In the DMSO solvent phase, the energy gap values are lower than those obtained in the acetone solvent phase. It has been found that AZM is more reactive in DMSO solutions.
In order to examine the properties of a molecular system in its excited state, the time-dependent den­sity functional theory is employed.81 A list of the excited energies, oscillator strengths, and absorption spectra is presented in Tabl e 1.2. The experimented UV spectrum, documented in the solvent phase (DMSO), demonstrates that the absorption peaks at 315, 280, and 258 nm are attributed to the π→π* transitions. In order to obtain theoretical absorption peaks, different solvent phases were used (DMSO and acetone). As can be seen from the gure, the absorption wavelengths for the DMSO and the acetone are calculated to be, respectively, 359, 280, and 248 nm and 339, 254, and 260 nm, which are in accor­dance with the experimental results.
1.2. 3 Tabtoxin
Tabtoxin (Figure 1.6), which is also referred to as the wildre toxin, is produced by P. syringae and is a simple monobactam phytotoxin. It is a dipeptide that consists of the amino acids threonine and tabtox­inine, which was a previously unidentied amino acid.
The compound is the precursor to one of the most effective antibiotics, tabtoxinine beta-lactam (TBL).
82
TBL is shown in Figur e 1.1 as a molecule with a chemical structure. Specically, it is produced by P. syringae pv. tabaci, the causal agent of the wildre of tobacco; P. syringae pv. Coronafaciens, P. syringae pv. Garcae, and P. syringae BR2 cause a disease of bean (P. vulgaris) similar to tobacco wildre. This
8 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 1.5 HOMO-LUMO orbitals of AZM molecule. Adapted with permission from Mani et al. (2023).
organism is closely related to P. syringae pv. It is not classied in the pathovar tabaci as it does not affect tobacco in any way, so it cannot be classied there either.
Tabtoxin is a dipeptide precursor to the biologically active form of TBL but differs from it in that it has an additional threonine attached via a peptide bond to the C terminus. Both chlorosis and lesion formation on bean plants require tabtoxin, which is produced by BR2(R). The lesion formation was also affected by all mutations that affected the production of tabtoxin, whether they were spontaneous dele­tions or transposon-induced mutations. It should be noted that in all cases, restoring tabtoxin production also resulted in a restoration of pathogenic symptoms. There may also be other factors that are needed
TABLE 1. 2
https://t.me/med1917
Electronic Properties of AZM Molecule Calculated Using TD-DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) Basis Set
λ
Solvents
DMSO 359 3.6419 0.0328
Acetone 339 3.9730 0.1280
Experimental 315 3.9630
Source: Adapted with permission from Mani et al. (2023).
FIGURE 1.6 Chemical structure of tabtoxin.
max
(nm)
280 4.6935 0.0015 248 4.5265 0.0018
254 4.5502 0.0002 260 4.6389 0.0005
280 4.4280 – 258 4.8056
Energy
(eV )
Oscillating
strength
Assignments for major
transitions
π→π* HL (97%) π→π* HL (85%) π→π* HL (98%) π→π* HL (96%) π→π* HL (97%) π→π* HL (87%) π→π* π→π* π→π*
Major contributions
(>1 0%)
– – –
9Beta-Lactams
FIGURE 1.7 Chemical structure of tabtoxinine beta-lactam.
for BR2 to be pathogenic in beans, but these appear to be in addition to the production of tabtoxin.83 The mechanism by which TBL acts as a toxin is by inhibiting the enzyme glutamine synthetase.
Tabtoxin is not a toxin by itself, but when it is hydrolyzed in the cell, it releases tabtoxinine (Figure
1.7), which is the active toxin in the body. In order to create its toxic effects, tabtoxin, through its compo­nent tabtoxinine, inactivates the enzyme glutamine synthetase, which results in a depletion of glutamine levels and, as a consequence, accumulation of toxic concentrations of ammonia in the cells. As a result of this, photosynthesis and photorespiration are uncoupled, as well as the thylakoid membrane of the chloroplast is destroyed, thereby causing chlorosis and eventually necrosis. Due to the effects of the toxin, the plant is unable to respond actively to the bacteria as a result of its reduced ability to respond.
As a result of the TBL treatment, glutamine synthetase has been shown to be irreversibly inhibited, which is an enzyme that is vital for the effective detoxication of ammonia by the body. Several det­rimental effects have been attributed to ammonia accumulation in plants, including the destruction of the thylakoid membrane of the chloroplasts and the uncoupling of photophosphorylation. This has been associated with the adenylylation of glutamine synthetase acting as a defense mechanism against the toxin. This makes the target enzyme less susceptible to inactivation by TBL. The synthesis of beta­lactamases is another potential detoxication mechanism, which hydrolyzes the beta-lactam ring of TBL in order to release the nontoxic metabolite, tabtoxinine, as a result.
The inhibition of glutamine synthetase from peas by tabtoxinine-beta-lactam was reported.84 There is evidence that TBL inhibits the synthesis of glutamine from pea seeds. In the presence of 10-millimolar glutamate, TBL exhibits linear inhibition of the initial velocity of the enzyme over a range of 0.5–5 mil­limolars of TBL (Fig ure 1.8).
The inactivation of glutamine synthetase in Z. mays suspension culture cells by TBL was observed in vivo.1 When cells were treated with 50 micromolar TBL, less than 40% of the initial glutamine syn­thetase activity remained after 60 minutes (Figure 1.9). The kinetics of in vivo glutamine synthetase
10 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 1.8 Response of pea GS to various concentrations of tabtoxinine-beta-lactam. Adapted with permission from
Thomas MD (1983).
FIGURE 1.9 Tabtoxinine-beta-lactam-dependent loss of in vivo glutamine synthetase (GS) activity as a function of time.
(a) Tabtoxinine-beta-lactam concentrations were 10 μM (), 50 μM (), 100 μM (), 300 μM (), 600 μM (x), and 1000 μM (). (b) A log plot of the same data. Adapted with permission from Bush DR et al. (1987).
11Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 1.10 Log plot of in vitro inactivation of puried glutamine synthetase (GS) by tabtoxinine-beta-lactam as a
function of time. Tabtoxinine-ß-lactam concentrations were 50 μM (●), 100 μM (), 500 μM (), and 2000 μM (). Adapted with permission from Bush DR et al. (1987).
FIGURE 1.11 Effect of uptake solution pH on tabtoxinine-beta-lactam-dependent loss of in vivo glutamine synthetase
activity. Adapted with permission from Bush DR et al. (1987).
inactivation by TBL (50–1000 μm) was not of the rst order, indicating gradually slower inactivation rates, possibly due to the complexity of two separate processes, e.g., the uptake of the toxin and the subsequent inhibition of the enzyme. Similarly, the kinetics of the inactivation of puried glutamine syn­thetase by TBL in vitro were also non-rst order (50–2000 μm) and were associated with progressively slower rates of inactivation, indicating that in the plant, enzyme inactivation becomes the rate-limiting step. An example of the log plot illustrating the in vitro inactivation of puried glutamine synthetase (GS) by TBL as a function of time is shown in Fig u re 1.1.
Taking into account that TBL ux into the cell contributes to the inactivation of glutamine synthetase in the plant, in vivo inactivation of glutamine synthetase was examined under conditions that might affect toxin uptake. It was found that the incubation of glutamine synthetase with 1 mm methionine or alanine inhibited in vivo inactivation of the enzyme when it was exposed to 300 μm toxin. A pH of about 4 and a half was found to be the optimum for TBL activity, and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl­hydrazone, a protonophore and metabolic inhibitor, inhibited the transport of the toxin. The results