Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5872_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
28 Мб
Скачать
52 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
109. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,
Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collabora­tion with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2 0 06;114 (5 ):e84 –
231. doi:10.1161/C IRCULATIONAHA.10 6.176857
110. Mohr JA, Clark RM, Waack TC, Whang R. Nafcillin-associated hypokalemia. JAM A. 1979;242(6):544.
111. Lang CC, Jamal SK, Mohamed Z, Mustafa MR, Mustafa AM, Lee TC. Evidence of an interac-
tion between nifedipine and nafcillin in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55(6):588–590. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01789.x
112. Greenwood D. Antimicrobial Drugs: Chronicle of a Twentieth Century Medical Triumph. OUP Oxford;
2008.
113. Gillies M, Ranakusuma A, Hoffmann T, Thorning S, McGuire T, Glasziou P, et al. Common harms
from amoxicillin: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials for any indication. CMAJ. 2015;187(1):E21-E31. doi:10.1503/cmaj.140 848
114. Roy J. An Introduction to Pharmaceutical Sciences: Production, Chemistry, Techniques and
Technology. Elsevier; 2011.
115. Kelly DA. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System in Children. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
116. Zhanel GG, Siemens S, Slayter K, Mandell L. Antibiotic and oral contraceptive drug interactions: Is
there a need for concern? Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 10:429–433. doi:10.1155/1999/539376
117. Ravina E. The Evolution of Drug Discovery: From Traditional Medicines to Modern Drugs. John Wiley
& Sons; 2011.
118. Magdesian KG. Equine Pharmacology, An Issue of Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine
Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
119. DACVCP MGP DVM, MS. Saunders Handbook of Veterinary Drugs: Small and Large Animal. Elsevier
Health Sciences; 2015.
120. Hauser AR. Antibiotic Basics for Clinicians: The ABCs of Choosing the Right Antibacterial Agent.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
121. Akova M. Sulbactam-containing β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Clin Microbiol Infect.
20 08;14:185–188. d oi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01847.x
122. Suleyman G, Zervos MJ. Safety and efcacy of commonly used antimicrobial agents in the treatment of
enterococcal infections: A review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(2):153–167. doi:10.1517/14740338.20
16.1127349
123. Delcour AH. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta.
2009;1794(5):808–816. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.005
124. Basker MJ, Comber KR, Sutherland R, Valler GH. Carfecillin: Antibacterial activity in vitro and in
vivo. Chemotherapy. 2009;23(6):424–435. doi:10.1159/000222012
125. Andrews JM, Jevons G, Walker R, Ashby J, Fraise AP. Temocillin susceptibility by BSAC methodology.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;6 0 (1):185 –187. doi:10.1093/jac/dkm179
126. Van Landuyt HW, Pyckavet M, Lambert A, Boelaert J. In vitro activity of temocillin (BRL 17421), a novel
beta-lactam antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22(4):535–540. doi:10.1128/AAC.22.4.535
127. Chanal M, Sirot J, Cluzel M, Joly B, Glanddier Y. In vitro study of the bacteriostatic and bactericidal
activity of temocillin (BRL 17421). Pathol Biol (Paris). 1983;31(6):467–470.
128. Livermore DM, Hope R, Fagan EJ, Warner M, Woodford N, Potz N. Activity of temocillin against
prevalent ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from south-east England. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(5):1012 –1014. doi:10.1093/jac/d k l043
129. Tan JS, File TM. Antipseudomonal penicillins. Med Clin N Am. 1995;79(4):679– 693. doi:10.1016/
S0025-7125(16)30032-3
130. Klastersky JA, ed. Febrile Neutropenia. Springer; 1997. doi:10.1007/9 78-3-642- 60443- 0
53Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
131. Zhanel GG, DeCorby M, Laing N, Weshnoweski B, Vashisht R, Tailor F, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant
pathogens in intensive care units in Canada: Results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) study, 2005–2006. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 20 08;52(4):1430–1437. doi:10.1128/ aac.01538-07
132. Gin A, Dilay L, Karlowsky JA, Walkty A, Rubinstein E, Zhanel GG. Piperacillin–tazobactam:
A β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007;5(3):365–383. doi:10.1586/14787210.5.3.365
133. Pandey N, Cascella M. Beta-Lactam Antibiotics. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. htt p://
www .ncbi .nlm .nih .gov /books /NBK545311/. Accessed September 28, 2023
134. Tipper DJ, Strominger JL. Mechanism of action of penicillins: A proposal based on their structural
similarity to acyl-D-alanyl-D-alanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965;5 4 (4):1133 –1141.
135. Narisada M, Tsuji T. 1-Oxacephem antibiotics. In: Lukacs G, Ohno M, eds. Recent Progress in the
Chemical Synthesis of Antibiotics. Springer; 1990:705–725. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75617-7_19
136. Gootz TD. Discovery and development of new antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3(1):13–
31. doi:10.1128/CMR.3.1.13
137. Moellering RC, Dray M, Kunz LJ. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of bacteria to cefoxitin and cepha-
lothin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974;6(3):320–323. doi:10.1128/aac.6.3.320
138. Goldfrank L, Flomenbaum N, Nelson L. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, Eighth Edition.
McGraw-Hill Companies, Incorporated; 2006.
139. Yazawa K, Mikami Y, Uno J, Otozai K, Arai T. In-vitro activity of omoxef, a new oxacephem
group antibiotic, against Nocardia in comparison with other cephalosporins. J Antimicro Chemother. 1989;24(6):921–925. doi:10.1093/jac/24.6.921
140. Cazzola M, Brancaccio V, De Giglio C, Paternò E, Matera MG, Rossi F. Flomoxef, a new oxacephem
antibiotic, does not cause hemostatic defects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 19 93;31(3):14 8 –152.
141. Weitekamp MR, Aber RC. Prolonged bleeding times and bleeding diathesis associated with moxalac-
tam administration. JAMA. 1983;249(1):69–71.
142. Brown RB, Klar J, Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, Sands M. Enhanced bleeding with cefoxitin
or moxalactam: Statistical analysis within a dened population of 1493 patients. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(11):2159–2164. doi:10.1001/archinte.1986.00360230079013
143. Salem RR, McIndoe A, Matkin JA, Lidou AC, Clarke A, Wood CB. The hematologic effects of
latamoxef sodium when used as a prophylaxis during surgical treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987;164(6):525–529.
144. Masuda Z, Kurosaki Y, Ishino K, Yamauchi K, Sano S. Pharmacokinetic analysis of omoxef in chil-
dren undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and modied ultraltration. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 20 0 8;56(4):163–169. doi:10.1007/s11748-007-0208-5
145. Ito M, Ishigami T. The meaning of the development of omoxef and clinical experience in Japan.
Infection. 1991;19(5):S253-S257. doi:10.1007/ BF 01645536
146. Birnbaum J, Kahan FM, Kropp H, Macdonald JS. Carbapenems, a new class of beta-lactam antibiot-
ics: Discovery and development of imipenem/cilastatin. The American Journal of Medicine. 1985;78(6, Supplement 1):3–21. doi:10.1016/0 0 02-9343(85)90 0 9 7-X
147. Breilh D, Texier-Maugein J, Allaouchiche B, Saux MC, Boselli E. Carbapenems. J Chemother.
2013;25(1):1–17. doi:10.1179/1973947812Y.0000000032
148. Papp-Wallace KM, Endimiani A, Taracila MA, Bonomo RA. Carbapenems: Past, present, and future.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(11):4943–4960. doi:10.1128/aac.0 0 296-11
149. Livermore DM, Woodford N. Carbapenemases: A problem in waiting? Curr Opin Microbiol.
2000;3(5):489–495. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00128-4
150. Zhanel GG, Simor AE, Vercaigne L, Mandell L, Canadian Carbapenem Discussion Group. Imipenem
and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects. Can J Infect Dis. 1998;9(4):215–228. doi:10.1155/199 8/831425
151. Chahine EB, Ferrill MJ, Poulakos MN. Doripenem: A new carbapenem antibiotic. Am J Health Syst
Pharm. 2010;67(23):2015–2024. doi:10. 214 6/ajh p 0 90672
152. Pei G, Yin W, Zhang Y, Wang T, Mao Y, Sun Y. Efcacy and safety of biapenem in treatment of infec-
tious disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Chemother. 2016;28(1):28–36. doi:10.1 179/1973947814Y.0000000226
54 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
153. Hazra S, Xu H, Blanchard JS. Tebipenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic, is a slow substrate that inhib-
its the β-lactamase from mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochem. 2014;53(22):3671–3678. doi:10.1021/ bi500339j
154. Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. Predictive accuracy of disk diffusion test for Proteus vulgaris and Providencia
species against ve newer orally administered cephalosporins, cefdinir, cefetamet, cefprozil, cefurox­ime, and loracarbef. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(2):559–562.
155. Arulanantham H, Kershaw NJ, Hewitson KS, Hughes CE, Thirkettle JE, Schoeld CJ. ORF17 from
the clavulanic acid biosynthesis gene cluster catalyzes the ATP-dependent formation of N-glycyl­clavaminic acid. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(1):279–287. doi:10.1074/jbc.M507711200
156. Tahlan K, Park HU, Wong A, Beatty PH, Jensen SE. Two sets of paralogous genes encode the enzymes
involved in the early stages of clavulanic acid and clavam metabolite biosynthesis in Streptomyces cla­vuligerus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 20 04;48(3):930–939. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.3.930 -939.20 0 4
157. To r taja da Gir b és M, Ferrer Franco A, Gracia Antequera M, Clement Paredes A, García Muñoz E,
Tallón Guerola M. Hypersensitivity to clavulanic acid in children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 20 08;36(5):308 –310. doi:10.1016/s 0301- 0546(08)75228-5
158. Townsend CA. New reactions in clavulanic acid biosynthesis. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002;6(5):583–
589. doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00392-7
159. Reading C, Cole M. Clavulanic acid: A beta-lactamase-inhibiting beta-lactam from Streptomyces cla-
vuligerus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977;11(5):852–857. doi:10.1128/AAC.11.5.852
160. Totir MA, Helfand MS, Carey MP, Sheri A, Buynak JD, Bonomo RA, et al. Sulbactam forms only mini-
mal amounts of irreversible acrylate-enzyme with SHV-1 β-lactamase. Biochem. 2007;46(31):8980 –
8987. doi:10.1021/ bi70 06146
161. Crass RL, Pai MP. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of β-lactamase inhibitors.
Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39(2):182–195. doi:10.1002 /phar.2210
162. Penwell WF, Shapiro AB, Giacobbe RA, Gu RF, Gao N, Thresher J, et al. Molecular mechanisms of
sulbactam antibacterial activity and resistance determinants in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(3):1680–1689. doi:10.1128/AAC.048 08-14
163. Yang Y, Rasmussen BA, Shlaes DM. Class A beta-lactamases--enzyme-inhibitor interactions and resis-
tance. Pharmacol Ther. 1999;83(2):141–151. doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(99)00027-3
164. Doern GV, Pierce G, Brueggemann AB. In vitro activity of sanfetrinem (GV104326), a new trinem anti-
microbial agent, versus Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus inuenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;26(1):39– 42. doi:10.1016/S0732-8893(96)00173-3
165. Kanno O, Shimoji Y, Ohya S, Kawamoto I. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel tricyclic car-
bapenems (trinems). J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2000;53(4):404–414.
166. Hanessian S, Rozema MJ, Reddy GB, Braganza JF. Tricyclic β-lactams: Total synthesis and anti-
bacterial activity of 5α- and 5β-methoxy-tribactams. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1995;5(21):2535–2540. doi:10.1016/0960-894X(95)00445-Y
167. Géhanne S, Piga E, Andreotti D, Biondi S, Pizzi, D. Synthesis and antibacterial, activity of 4-ureido
trinems. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1996;6(22):2791–2794. doi:10.1016/S0960-894X(96)0 0 515-X
168. Sato J, Kusano H, Aoki T, Shibuya S, Yokoo K, Komano K, et al. A novel tricyclic β-lactam exhibiting
potent antibacterial activities against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Synthesis and structure­activity-relationships. Bioorg Med Chem. 2021;46:116343. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116343
169. Sato J, Oguma T, Yamawaki K. Stereoselective synthesis of tricyclic β-lactam by sulfoxide-directed
oxidative lactonization from an accessible cephalosporin intermediate. J Org Chem. 2022;87(16):11231–
11236. doi:10.1021/acs.joc .2c01113
170. Wang JM, Zhao Y, Li WP, Kong XJ, Yao CS, Zhang K. Synthesis of tetracyclic dibenzo[b,f][1,4]
oxazepine-fused β-lactams via visible-light-induced Staudinger annulation. Org Biomol Chem. 2023;21(35):7106 –7114. doi:10.1039/D3OB01078C
171. Deshmukh ARAS, Jayanthi A, Thiagarajan K, Puranik VG, Bhawal BM. Synthesis of polycyclic
β-lactams from d-glucose derived chiral template via substrate-controlled radical cyclization. Synthesis. 2004;2004(18):2965–2974. doi:10.1055/s-200 4 -834890
2
https://t.me/med1917
Monocyclic Beta-Lactams: Stereocontrolled
Synthesis by Diverse Methods
Bimal Krishna Banik1 and Aparna Das
“1
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, College of Sciences and Human Studies, Deanship of Research Development, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
2
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, College of Sciences and Human Studies, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. *Corresponding authors: Aparna Das, email: aparnadasam @gmail .c om; BimalKrishna Banik, email: bimalbanik10 @gmail .c om; bbanik @pmu .edu .sa
2
2.1 Introduction
Heterocyclic molecules have a great impact on medicines,1 which are associated with their ability to interact with proteins.2 The discovery of β-lactams has been considered as the most important nding of the 20th century. This has become the high-utility tool for humans to ght against diverse diseases. 2-Azetidinone, the chemical name of β-lactams, has remained as the most useful heterocycle since the discovery of penicillin antibiotics.3 Many other analogues of penicillins have been included in the class of antibiotics, for example, cephalosporins, monobactams, nocardicins, carbapenems, clavulanic acid, sulbactams, and tazobactams.
Researchers have focused on the antibacterial activities of 2-azetidinones at the initial stage of research
on these types of molecules. Many other pharmacological functions of β-lactams have been discovered, and therefore, interests in this eld have grown signicantly. For example, β-specic lactams have been reported as antifungal, anti-inammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-HIV, anticancer, and anti-parkinsonian agents.5 They have shown inhibition towards serine proteases and been found to act as luteinizing hor­mone–releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist.5 They have found applications as thrombin inhibitor, cho­lesterol absorption inhibitor, human leukocyte elastase inhibitor, and inhibitors of viruses such as herpes virus and Picornaviridae.5 The β-lactams have utility as synthetic intermediates in organic synthesis.6 The core structure of β-lactam is shown in Figure 2.1.
4
2.2 Classification of β-Lactams
The β-lactam derivatives have been classied under different categories. Different types of β-lactams are available. For example, monocyclic, bicyclic, tricyclic, tetracyclic, biscyclic, spirocyclic, and heterocyclic β-lactams are available (Figure 2.2).
2.3 Biological Activities of β-Lactams
As stated already, various biological activities have been seen in β-lactams (Figure 2.3).
DOI: 10.1201/9780367816339-2
55
56 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
N1
C3 C4
Monocyclic
Bis -lactams
d
https://t.me/med1917
N
O
FIGURE 2.1 General skeleton of β-lactam.
3
1
R
O
R2R
N
-lactams
4
R
5
R
N
O
Heteroaryl substitute
X
n
O
-lactams
X
n
N
X
n
NH
O
N
O
Bicyclic -lactams
FIGURE 2.2 Different types of β-lactams.
Antiviral
Antidiabetic
Anticancer
Antitubercular
O
HLE
inhibitor
N
O
N
O
Spirocyclic -lactams
N
N
O
Thrombin
inhibitor
-LactamAntimicrobial
Chymase &
Tryptase inhibitor
Vasopressin
antagonist
Cholesterol
absorption
inhibitor
Antiparkinsonian
Antiinflammatory
& Analgesic
FIGURE 2.3 Diverse biological activities of β-lactams.
2.4 Construction of β-Lactams
Signicant research has been conducted in exploring various synthetic aspects of β-lactams.1 Most of the methods for the construction of β-lactams are classied under two categories: cycloaddition and cycliza­tion reactions.
57Monocyclic Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
2.4.1 Cycloaddition Reactions
Cycloaddition reactions have exceptional contribution in organic synthesis. These reactions are useful due to their excellent efciency. The synthesis of β-lactams can be performed using different types of cycloaddition reactions. A few best methods include Staudinger cycloaddition, nitrone-alkyne cycloaddi­tion, ester enolate-imine condensation, and isocyanate-alkene cycloadditions (Figure 2.4).
2
The ketene-imine cycloaddition reaction is the common method for the preparation of β-lactams.3 This
is because of the mild reaction conditions and accessibility of various substrates with different functional groups.
2.4.2 Cyclization Reactions
These methods are useful. A few cyclization reactions can lead to a β-lactam ring that involves N1–C2 bond formation, N1–C4 bond formation, and C3–C4 bond formation.
2
The N1–C2 bond formation is achieved by cyclization of β-amino esters or β-amino alcohols.7 Some bases such as LDA and LHMDS are required. In addition, cyclization of α-aminoketenes under basic or photochemical conditions gives β-lactams.
The other cyclization for the formation of β-lactam ring is via N1–C4 bond formation.8 This method needs β-haloenamide, β-amino alcohols, and β-hydroxamate esters.
The β-lactams can also be formed by a cyclization of C3–C4 bond, known as C-alkylation method (Figure 2.5).
9
2.4.3 Other Methods
Some other strategies are also reported, such as metal-catalyzed carbonylation, ring expansion reactions, C–H insertion reactions, and multi-component reactions.
10, 11
FIGURE 2.4 Synthesis of β-lactams by diverse methods.
58 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
H
H
H
H
H
Aztreonam
OH
Tigemonam
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 2.5 Synthesis of β-lactams via diverse cyclization methods.
R
N
OH
N
R
O
HOOC
Nocardicins
O
S
N C
N
O
H N
C
H
H
H
OCH
N
O SO
O
N
N
3
FIGURE 2.6 Clinically active monocyclic β-lactams.
O
S
H2N
3
-
+
Na
3
N
HOOC
N
O SO
Monobactams
O
NH
N
O
O O
-
+
Na
3
N
S
O
O
2.5 Monocyclic β-Lactams
Interestingly, nocardicin 1 is the rst β-lactam antibiotic containing monocyclic β-lactam ring, which demonstrates that bicyclic ring in β-lactam antibiotics is not required. Other antibiotics that belong to this group from this class are monobactams, aztreonam, and tigemonam (Figure 2.6).
Bhat et al.12 carried out synthesis of 2-(4- metho xyphe nylam ino)a cetam ido-s ubsti tuted 3-chloro-β- lactams. These were subjected to in vitro antimicrobial test against four bacterial strains and one fungal strain. These compounds showed good activity, and β-lactam with 4-nitroaryl group at C4 demonstrated maximum potency.
Bagherwal et al.13 investigated monocyclic 3-chloro-β-lactam substituted with naphthylaminoacet­amide and screened for potential antibacterial and antifungal activities. These compounds showed anti­microbial activities with maximum potency against Gram-positive strain. The β-lactams with 4-ClC6H4, 4-OMeC6H4, and 4-NMe2C6H4 demonstrated excellent antimicrobial activity (Figure 2 .7).
Rokade et al.14 reported the synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of β-naphthol-derived 2-azetidi­nones. The antibacterial activity was screened against S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, while anti­fungal function was checked against A. niger. The chloro-, methyl-, and methoxy-substituted aryl groups at C4 demonstrated excellent activity.
Gawande et al.15 reported microwave irradiation method for the synthesis of 2-azetidinone derivatives followed by antibacterial test against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. The
59Monocyclic Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 2.7 N-hydrazide/hydrazone-β-lactams.
SAR study revealed that electron-withdrawing property of C4 aryl substituents is responsible for the antibacterial function. The bromo derivative was the most and the methyl derivative was the least active in a series.
Patel et al.16 prepared benzamide-substituted β-lactam derivatives. The in vitro antibacterial test was done against B. cereus, E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. aureus. β-Lactam derivatives with 4-hydroxyphenyl group showed excellent results.
A few 4-ary l-3-c hloro -N-(3 ,4,5- trihy droxy benza mido) -2-az etidi nones were prepared by Ilango et al.17 Some activities were investigated against B. subtilis, S. aureus, S. mutant, E. coli, K. pneumonia, P. aeru- ginosa, C. albicans, A. niger, and M. tuberculosis. The β-lactams with chlorophenyl and dimethylamino group exhibited excellent activity with Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values of 1.56–12.5 μg/ mL (antimicrobial) and 0.57–0.83 μg/mL (antitubercular). It was found that the electron-withdrawing nature and bulky groups signicantly enhance the activities.
Halve et al.18 reported the synthesis and antimicrobial screening of N1–C4-substituted β-lactam. The
in vitro antimicrobial test was performed against anthracis, S. typhi, S. aureus, A. niger, A. fumigates, and C. albicans. The β-lactams with m-Cl, p-Cl, and m-NO2 aryl groups showed good antibacterial and
antifungal activities. In addition, β-lactam with p-ClC6H4 group showed the best inhibitory function against C. albicans (MIC 31.25 μg/mL). The azo derivatives of β-lactams were found to be less active.
A series of gallic acid-derived 2-azetidinones were prepared via cycloaddition reaction by Cao et al.19 The authors investigated preliminary studies on these molecules for insecticidal activity against H.
60 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
armigera and P. xylostella. The compounds were found to be totally inactive against P. xylostella. Four
β-lactams displayed insecticidal activity against H. armigera at a dosage level of 200 μg/mL. β-Lactams with Ph and iPr groups showed moderate activity. An introduction of electron-withdrawing groups (F, Cl, and CF3) decreased the activities.
A few β-lactam derivatives anchored with 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl ring were described by Swamy et al.20 These were synthesized via ketene-imine cycloaddition between 4-chlorophenoxyacetyl chloride and hydrazide-hydrazones. All these compounds were screened against various bacterial strains for anti­bacterial activity. The results demonstrated that β-lactams with 3-NO2-4-F-C6H3 and 2-methylpyridine groups have good potency.
Shah et al.21 synthesized 4-[(4 -(car boxyp henyl )-oxy )]-3, 3-die thyl- 1-[[( pheny lmeth yl)am ino]c arbon yl]-2 -azet idino nes. The lead compound with two alkyl groups at C3 was stable with good inhibitory activity. A few modications of this compound were conducted. These new β-lactam derivatives were examined for in vitro as well as in vivo HLE inhibition. The results indicated that the methylene groups between urea-N and aromatic ring improve enzyme inhibition. The presence of Me or OMe group at the fourth position of phenyl ring improved in vitro and in vivo results. It was concluded that in vitro activi­ties were improved in comparison to in vivo.
Green et al.22 synthesized, studied, and discussed the mechanism of human leukocyte elastase (HLE) inhibition by monocyclic 3,3-dialkyl-β-lactams. The formation of reversible enzyme-inhibitor complex and subsequent formation of acyl-enzyme complex were depended on the partition ratio (k
, i.e., enzyme turnover and inactivation). The study indicated that substitution of urea at N1
cat/kinac
controls the stability of the molecule-derived HLE-I complexes. But the nature of C4 group did not alter the stability of complex. The structural model β-lactam-generated acyl-enzyme complexes indi­cated different stabilities. This was explained due to an interaction with hydrophobic pocket and ori­entation of residue.
Borthwick et al.23 designed and synthesized 3-substituted/unsubstituted 2-azetidinones as human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) protease inhibitors. The SAR investigations on N-urea-β-lactams identied a compound with good aqueous solubility (Ki 5.7 μM) and stability (t
22.8). Moreover, the potent
1/2
β-lactam showed excellent selectivity for δAla HCMV (IC50 17 μM) in comparison to viral enzymes, viz. acetylcholine esterase, elastase, and chymotrypsin (IC50 >10 0 μM). The anti-HCMV activity was dependent on size, bulk of substituents, and relative stereochemistry (Figure 2.8).
Stereospecic synthesis of 4-[(4 -carb oxyph enyl) oxyl] -3,3- dialk yl-l- [[(l- pheny lalky l)-am ino]c arbon yl] az etidi n-2-o ne was described by Finke et al.24 In this study, hydrolytic stability, in vitro inhibition for HLE, and in vivo oral efcacy were investigated. A (4S)-β-lactam showed excellent inhibition. On the other hand, t-butyl esters were more potent but less viable because of metabolic instability and aqueous insolubility. In addition, racemic 3-β-ethyl β-lactam exhibited improved activity. It was concluded that 4R isomer of all the β-lactam shows poor activity. Also, increasing the size of the substituent diminished the activ i t y.
Turos et al.9 investigated N-thiolated β-lactam antibiotics as anti-bacillus agent. The SAR studies indicate to balance the lipophilic character of C3–C4 substituents of β-lactam ring to obtain optimal anti-bacillus activity. 3-Allyloxy/propyloxy-β-lactams demonstrated better activity than the 3-methoxy­β-lactam, while benzoyl ester was weaker. The 3-arylsulfonyl-β-lactam was more active against Bacillus microbes with respect to methanesulfonyl derivatives. The polar side chains had a detrimental effect, which was seen in C3 amino derivatives. Moreover, replacement of the methoxy group at C3 with chloro group increased anti-Bacillus activity, whereas iodo or azido groups exhibited lower activity. The m- and p-substituted aryl systems at C4 demonstrated superior activity than o-substituted aromatic groups, while no major change in activity was observed in different substitution patterns. Importantly, N-sec­butylthio-β-lactam was proven to be most active.
Many series of N-thiolated β-lactams were tested for antifungal activity.10 Antifungal activity test was performed against various Candida sp. These investigations proved that halogens (F or Cl) at para posi­tion of C4 aryl group on β-lactam nucleus were less active compared to ortho-substituted compound. The presence of multiple halo groups signicantly improved the antifungal function. But changing the C3 methoxy group with other alkoxy groups (PhO or AcO) decreased the antifungal activity. In addition, increasing the bulk of N1 substituents of β-lactam ring (sec-butyl S and methyl S) decreased the activity.9
61Monocyclic Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 2.8 N-urea-β-lactams.
The antifungal activity of N-thiolated β-lactams was due to the cytostatic effects, which leads to the disruption of structure of cytoplasmic membrane.
Cervellati et al.
11b
ty
against Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains including strains from cystic brosis (MRSA and
11a
investigated monocyclic N-methylthio-β-lactams with excellent antibacterial activi-
MSSA). The study was conducted to identify molecules with dual action (antibacterial and antioxidant). The results indicated that β-lactams with polyphenolic substituents activated radical scavenging ability against DPPH, ABTS, and HOO. The dual property was found in β-lactam bearing phenolic moieties on hydroxyethyl side chains. The authors disafrmed the involvement of sulfur groups towards antioxidant activity using CV measurements. The redox potential of β-lactams with sulfur substituents was found to be 0.82–0.88 V in comparison to the redox potential of couples such as DPPH/DPPH (0.28 V) and ABTS+/ABTS (0.68 V). This suggested that N-methylthio substituent is not prone to oxidation and so phenolic groups are responsible for their activity (Figure 2.9).
McKittrick et al.
25a
synthesized and evaluated a series of C3 heteroatom-substituted β-lactams as
CAIs. These β-lactams were synthesized by introducing isosteric and isoelectronic groups (S, SO, SO2, PO2Me, POOH) at 1’ and 3’ positions of the C3 side chain of SCH 56524. It was found that an alteration at 3’ position of the C3 side chain lowers the activity, while changes at 1’ position resulted in increased CAI. In addition, optically pure cis- and trans-β-lactams were prepared, and some of the compounds showed multi-fold CAI activity (Figure 2.10).
Deziel et al.
25b
synthesized two novel peptidyl series and non-peptidic series of β-lactams. In a study,
26b
it was shown that C3 peptidyl β-lactams have good inhibition of HCMV protease (IC50 33 μM). So, SAR studies were conducted by introducing C4 peptidic pharmacophore unit on β-lactam ring. The structural alterations led to the identication of a β-lactam as the most potent inhibitor (IC50 0.07 μM) having a