Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_936_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
444
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
studies attempting to find associations between osteophyte features and dys­phagia. Anecdotally, there are many clinical scenarios where removal of obstructive cervical osteophytes may improve swallowing function. How­ever, much of the literature supporting the use of osteophytectomy to improve dysphagia is based on small case series or case reports, so a well-constructed prospective study would be a welcome addition to the literature.
Spinal Surgery
The role of cervical spinal surgery in the development and treatment of dyspha­gia is a complicated and challenging field. Wide variation in the rate of dys­phagia postoperatively from 1% to 79% is found in the existing literature, with results often dependent on instruments used to evaluate dysphagia (Anderson & Arnold, 2013). However, the abil­ity to select appropriate spine disease patients for surgical treatment of dys­phagia is hampered by inconsistent sur­gical indications without rigorous vali­dation in large patient series, despite the prevalence of spinal surgery.
Postoperative changes that contrib­ute to dysphagia include structural alterations such as hematoma, edema, plate size, and nerve injury (cranial nerves IX, X, and XII; ansa cervicalis; cervical plexus; and vagal plexus can all be affected). The vagus nerve is a key element in swallowing function, so nerve injury can affect pharyngeal function through a number of mecha­nisms: disruption of the pharyngeal branch of the vagus or vagal plexus, superior laryngeal nerve injury impact­ing laryngeal sensation, or vocal fold
immobility following recurrent laryn­geal nerve damage. Cricopharyngeus muscle control, pharynx sensation, and tongue mobility and strength can also be affected through related nerves. In addition, intraoperative factors that contribute to prolonged pressure or traction on the esophageal or recurrent laryngeal nerve are thought to alter oropharyngeal and esophageal motil­ity and function, potentially through impaired microcirculation and muscu­lar injury (Tortolani et al., 2006). In the case of cervical fusion and instrumen­tation, plate thickness and level have also been associated with increased dysphagia, with more severe impact among patients needing C3–C4 instru­mentation or multilevel plating (Lee etal., 2007; Papadopoulou et al., 2013). Immediate postoperative swallow­ing symptoms are common and not surprising given the necessary surgi­cal approach and postoperative tissue edema and healing; generally, these effects decrease with time (Min et al., 2016; Ziegler et al., 2021). Late postop­erative concerns include pharyngeal or esophageal perforation, delayed isch­emic nerve injury, or traction divertic­ulum. Traction diverticuli are related to pharyngeal mucosal and submuco­sal adherence to hardware or fibrosis, with pharyngeal stripping wave forces leading to progressive diverticulum formation in the pharyngeal mucosa and submucosa, which is distinct from the Zenker’s diverticulum due to a hypertonic cricopharyngeus muscle (Figure 19–5). For patients with high cervical traumatic injuries that require stabilization, injuries to the spinal cord and cervical nerves can cause complete sensory deficiency as well as motor impairment.
19. SPINAL ABNORMALITIES IN DYSPHAGIA
https://t.me/medicina_free
445
Various instruments and methods have been used to evaluate patients for dysphagia who undergo spinal surgery. Most large series investigating oropha­ryngeal dysphagia following anterior spinal surgery are found in the spine surgery literature and use the Bazaz dysphagia grading system (Table 19–1), which is simple and accomplished via
telephone interviews (Bazaz et al., 2002). One of the largest and earliest prospec­tive cohort series including multiple types of anterior spine surgery found early postoperative dysphagia in 54% of patients, which declined to 13.6% at 24 months (Lee et al., 2007). Approxi­mately half of these patients had some form of permanent instrumentation
Figure 19–5. Traction diverticulum. Videofluoroscopic swallow study (A) of a patient
who required initial spinal surgery for traumatic cervical spine injury that was compli­cated by late infection and osteomyelitis, which caused the appearance of a diverticu­lum. CT scan (B) suggested hardware had extruded through the posterior pharyngeal wall, which was confirmed on suspension laryngoscopy and found to be the opening of a fistula tract.
Table 19–1. Bazaz Dysphagia Scoring System
Degree of Dysphagia Liquid Solid
None None None
Mild None Rare
Moderate None or rare Occasional (only
with specific food)
Severe Present Frequent (majority of
solids)
Source: Bazaz, R., Lee, M. J., and Yoo, J. U. (2002). Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: A prospective study. Spine, 27, pp. 2453–
2458. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
446
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
placed. Limitations of this study were that it was based on telephone inter­views and the Bazaz grading system has not undergone rigorous validation (Bazaz et al., 2002). A recent review of dysphagia assessment in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion high­lighted the potential biases and short­comings of the literature, with the majority of studies relying on retro­spective study designs. Furthermore, 46% of studies relied on “unvalidated patient-reported outcome measures” (Molfenter et al., 2023).
Review of patients presenting at a tertiary dysphagia center with symp­toms of dysphagia after spine surgery found aspiration and objective fluoros­copy abnormalities to be very common in both the early and later postopera­tive periods. When evaluated within 2 months postoperatively, significant worsening in epiglottic inversion (ab­sent or incomplete), elevated pha­ryngeal constriction ratio, increased posterior pharyngeal wall thickness, decreased pharyngoesophageal seg­ment opening, and prolonged pharyn­geal transit time were identified. Most parameters improved over time, but mean hyoid elevation and pharyngeal transit time appeared worse (Leonard & Belafsky, 2011). One unknown factor is the prevalence of dysphagia owing to cervical spine surgery itself. This is a difficult parameter to evaluate second­ary to the indications for spine surgery and lack of recognition of dysphagia preoperatively due to more pressing concerns. In one small series evaluat­ing the prevalence of dysphagia 3 days preoperatively and 2 days postopera­tively, 47% of patients who underwent anterior spinal surgery developed dys­phagia (Smith-Hammond et al., 2004).
None of these patients had dysphagia preoperatively according to videofluo­roscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Pos­terior cervical approach was still associ­ated with dysphagia in 21% of patients, while no patients who underwent lumbar surgery developed dysphagia. Interestingly, a more current random­ized, prospective study found a simi­lar rate of dysphagia among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent anterior cervical sur­gery with instrumented fusion (41%) but no incidence of dysphagia among those with a posterior decompressive approach (Ghogawala et al., 2021).
MANAGEMENT
Medical
Prior to attributing dysphagia squarely to cervical spine abnormalities or sequelae of treatment, all additional causes of dysphagia must be consid­ered. Due to the increasing prevalence of spinal deformity with advancing age, numerous comorbidities may coex­ist with spinal abnormalities. In par­ticular, neurodegenerative disease and dementia, cerebrovascular accident, cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction, pill and infectious esophagitis, pres­byesophagus, and achalasia increase with age and their contribution to dys­phagia cannot be disregarded. Gas­troesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects between 2.5% and 20% of the population and varies depending on geographic location (Dent et al., 2005; Wong & Kinoshita, 2006). Rihn et al. (2011) showed, by utilizing the GERD Impact Scale (GIS) to compare patients undergoing anterior cervical spine sur-
19. SPINAL ABNORMALITIES IN DYSPHAGIA
https://t.me/medicina_free
447
gery with those undergoing lumbar spine surgery, the immediate postoper­ative (<2 week) absolute rate increase in reflux symptoms was 36% (relative rate increase = 83%), with a positive corre­lation between severity of dysphagia and GIS. The clinical outcome of this increased reflux symptomatology was that cervical surgery patients required more antacid medications. While there were increased reflux symptoms post­operatively among the cervical surgery group at 6 and 12 weeks, this difference was not statistically significant.
Lower spine kyphosis, scoliosis, lor­dosis, osteoporosis, and wedge com­pression fractures are associated with increased rate of GERD (Hosogane et al., 2017; Imagama et al., 2012; Kusano et al., 2008; Miyakoshi et al., 2009; Sugimoto et al., 2016; Yamaguchi etal., 2005; Yoshimura et al., 2008), second­ary to anatomic changes with subse­quent hiatus hernia. Cervical spine anomalies commonly cooccur with lower spinal abnormalities, so GERD is an important cofactor to consider. In a Japanese population with thoracolum­bar kyphosis, 70.8% of patients had endoscopic mucosal changes consistent with GERD, varying from Los Angeles (LA) grade A to D in severity (Sugimoto etal., 2016). Thoracolumbar kyphosis is often associated with excessive cervical lordosis as an adaptation in order to maintain an appropriate visual plane, and for thoracolumbar lordosis, cervi­cal kyphosis may be present as a similar adaptation.
Swallowing Strategies
Sensory stimulation and maneuvers are important components in managing
dysphagia among patients with cervi­cal spine abnormalities. Details of these topics are covered elsewhere and so are not dealt with in this chapter, but their value rests in improving the sensory response and strengthening oral and pharyngeal muscle function. Reduc­ing bolus size in the scenario of dimin­ished PES opening can be considered, while larger bolus sizes may be more manageable for patients with poor epi­glottic deflection. Bolus consistency is another controllable variable, where thicker consistency may be easier to control but requires more effort to swal­low. Multiple swallows is a consistently effective strategy in the spinal surgery population. For patients with obstruc­tive pathology and solid food dyspha­gia, lubrication of foods may allow easier passage. There are no therapeu­tic studies evaluating the use of differ­ent swallowing exercises or maneuvers in spinal abnormalities, so all tech­niques are extrapolated from other conditions. (See videos on the compan­ion website associated with Chapter19, including Video 19–1, CSpineBolusCon­sistManipulation, Video 19–2, CSpine­BolusVolManipulation, and Video 19–3, CSpine BolusRedirect).
Surgical
The primary target for spinal surgical therapy to improve dysphagia are ante­rior cervical osteophytes. It is essential that patients proposed to have dys­phagia in the context of osteophytes be evaluated to ensure that other common causes of dysphagia are excluded, as described above. Dysphagia clinicians must question whether the impairment is severe enough to limit diet, typically
www
www
448
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
with solids, or is potentially life-threat­ening due to risk of aspiration, which is more common with liquids (Seidler et al., 2009). In these instances, surgi­cal osteophytectomy is a valuable pro­cedure to greatly improve a patient’s quality of life and safety in eating. How­ever, as mentioned earlier, only low­quality evidence exists to support its use (Carlson et al., 2011; Krause & Cas­tro, 1994; Lambert et al., 1981; Urrutia & Bono, 2009; von der Hoeh et al., 2015). Unfortunately, it has also been shown that osteophytes can recur, reportedly at 1 mm/year, and require repeat resec­tion for recurrent dysphagia in some patients, with higher risk present in those with DISH (Miyamoto et al., 2009), though this has not been replicated in other series with similar follow-up dura­tion (Urrutia & Bono, 2009). Operative risks of anterior cervical spine surgery include hardware failure, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, infection, hema­toma, or worsened dysphagia, among others. For these reasons, enteral feed­ing through nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes is an important consideration among patients with severe dysphagia and comorbidities that preclude surgi­cal intervention. Preoperative realimen­tation is a valuable consideration in select patients due to malnutrition and higher risk of complications secondary to poor wound healing.
An alternative approach to patients with obstructing cervical osteophytes or with cervical hardware limiting epi­glottic inversion is partial epiglottec­tomy. In a small case series of patients with complaints of dysphagia and fluoroscopic findings of limited epi­glottic deflection with anterior cervical protrusion, partial epiglottectomy was associated with decreased pharyngeal
transit time and reduced vallecula resi­due (Jamal et al., 2015). Though promis­ing for its simplicity and familiarity to many surgeons, further investigation is necessary to determine appropriate selection criteria.
STUDY QUESTIONS
1. What are three possible causes of dysphagia related to the spine?
2. What is the difference between kyphosis and lordosis? Would you expect them to affect swallowing differently? If so, how?
3. What structural variables postoper­atively might affect swallowing in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery?
4. How might PES opening be affected by spine surgery?
5. What strategy (or strategies) might be worthwhile to consider in pa­tients experiencing difficulty with epiglottic inversion related to spine surgery?
REFERENCES
Anderson, K. K., & Arnold, P. M. (2013).
Oropharyngeal dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: A review. Global Spine Journal, 3(4), 273–286.
Bar-On, E., Harari, M., Floman, Y., Bar-Ziv,
J., & Maayan, C. (1998). Compression of the esophagus by the spine and the aorta in untreated scoliosis. Archives of Ortho- pedic and Trauma Surgery, 117, 405–407.
Bazaz, R., Lee, M. J., & Yoo, J. U. (2002). Inci-
dence of dysphagia after anterior cervi­cal spine surgery: A prospective study. Spine, 27, 2453–2458.
Carlson, M. L., Archibald, D. J., Graner, D.
E., & Kasperbauer, J. L. (2011). Surgical
19. SPINAL ABNORMALITIES IN DYSPHAGIA
https://t.me/medicina_free
449
management of dysphagia and airway obstruction in patients with prominent ventral cervical osteophytes. Dysphagia, 26, 34–40.
Cho, S. K., Safir, S., Lombardi, J. M., & Kim,
J. S. (2019). Cervical spine deformity: Indications, considerations, and surgical outcomes. Journal of the American Acad- emy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 27(12), e555– e567. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS­D-17-00546
Dent, J., El-Serag, H. B., Wallander, M. A.,
& Johansson, S. (2005). Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A sys­tematic review. Gut, 54(5), 710–717.
Ghogawala, Z., Terrin, N., Dunbar, M.
R., Breeze, J. L., Freund, K. M., Kanter, A. S., . . . Benzel, E. C. (2021). Effect of ventral vs dorsal spinal surgery on patient-reported physical functioning in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Arandomized clinical trial. JAMA, 325(10), 942–951. https://doi.org/
10.1001/jama.2021.1233
Hosogane, N., Watanabe, K., Yagi, M.,
Kaneko, S., Toyama, Y., & Matsumoto, M. (2017). Scoliosis is a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adult spinal deformity. Clinical Spine Surgery, 30(4), E480–E484.
Imagama, S., Hasegawa, Y., Wakao, N.,
Hirano, K., Hamajima, N., & Ishiguro, N. (2012). Influence of lumbar kyphosis and back muscle strength on the symp­toms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in middle-aged and elderly people. Euro- pean Spine Journal, 21(11), 2149–2157.
Jamal, N., Erman, A., & Chhetri, D. K.
(2015). Partial epiglottoplasty for pha­ryngeal dysphagia due to cervical spine pathology. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 153(4), 586–592.
Kang, K., & Moon, B. G. (2016). Develop-
mental abnormalities of the craniocer­vical junction resulting in Collet-Sicard syndrome. The Spine Journal, 16(9), e635– e639.
Kotil, K., Kalayci, M., & Bilge, T. (2007).
Management of cervicomedullary com-
pression in patients with congenital and acquired osseous-ligamentous patholo­gies. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 14(6), 540–549.
Krause, P., & Castro, W. H. (1994). Cervical
hyperostosis: A rare cause of dysphagia. Case description and bibliographical sur­vey. European Spine Journal, 3(1), 56–58.
Kusano, M., Hashizume, K., Ehara, Y., Shi-
moyama, Y., Kawamura, O., & Mori, M. (2008). Size of hiatus hernia correlates with severity of kyphosis, not with obe­sity, in elderly Japanese women. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 42, 345–350.
Lambert, J. R., Tepperman, P. S., Jimenez,
J., & Newman, A. (1981). Cervical spine disease and dysphagia. Four new cases and a review of the literature. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 76(1), 35–40.
Lee, M. J., Bazaz, R., Furey, C. G., & Yoo, J.
(2007). Risk factors for dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: A two­year prospective cohort study. The Spine Journal, 7(2), 141–147.
Leonard, R., & Belafsky, P. (2011). Dyspha-
gia following cervical spine surgery with anterior instrumentation: Evidence from fluoroscopic swallow studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36(25), 2217–2223. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182 05a1a7
Mann, G., Hankey, G. J., & Cameron, D.
(1999). Swallowing function after stroke: Prognosis and prognostic factors at 6months. Stroke, 30, 744–748.
Min, Y., Kim, W. S., Kang, S. S., Choi, J. M.,
Yeom, J. S., & Paik, N. J. (2016). Incidence of dysphagia and serial videofluoro­scopic swallow study findings after ante­rior cervical discectomy and fusion: Aprospective study. Clinical Spine Sur- gery, 29(4), E177–E181. https://doi.org/
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000060
Miyakoshi, N., Kasukawa, Y., Sasaki, H.,
Kamo, K., & Shimada, Y. (2009). Impact of spinal kyphosis on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International, 20(7), 1193–1198.
450
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
Miyamoto, K., Sugiyama, S., Hosoe, H.,
Iinuma, N., Suzuki, Y., & Shimizu, K. (2009). Postsurgical recurrence of osteo­phytes causing dysphagia in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyper­ostosis. European Spine Journal, 18(11), 1652–1658.
Molfenter, S. M., Amin, M. R., Balou, M.,
Herzberg, E. G., & Frempong-Boadu, A. (2023). A scoping review of the methods used to capture dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: The need for a paradigm shift. European Spine Jour- nal. Advance online publication. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07515-1
Mummaneni, P. V., Deutsch, H., & Mum-
maneni, V. P. (2006). Cervicothoracic kyphosis. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 17, 277–287.
Ota, M., Neo, M., Aoyama, T., Ishizaki, T.,
Fujibayashi, S., Takemoto, M., . . . Naka­mura, T. (2011). Impact of the O-C2 angle on the oropharyngeal space in normal patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36, E720–E726.
Papadopoulou, S., Exarchakos, G., Beris, A.,
& Ploumis, A. (2013). Dysphagia associ­ated with cervical spine and postural disorders. Dysphagia, 28(4), 469–480.
Randall, D. R., Strong, E. B., & Belafsky, P.
C. (2017). Altered pharyngeal structure and dynamics among patients with cervical kyphosis. Laryngoscope, 127(8), 1832–1837.
Rihn, J. A., Kane, J., Joshi, A., Albert, T. J.,
Vaccaro, A. R., Harrop, J., . . . Hilibrand, A. S. (2011). Gastroesophageal reflux after anterior cervical surgery: A con­trolled, prospective analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36(24), 2039–2044.
Seidler, T. O., Perez Alvarez, J. C., Wonne-
berger, K., & Hacki, T. (2009). Dyspha­gia caused by ventral osteophytes of the cervical spine: Clinical and radiographic findings. European Archives of Otorhino- laryngology, 266, 285–291.
Shem, K. L., Castillo, K., Wong, S. L., Chang,
J., Kao, M. C., & Kolakowsky-Hayner, S.
A. (2012). Diagnostic accuracy of bedside swallow evaluation versus videofluoros­copy to assess dysphagia in individuals with tetraplegia. Journal of Injury, Func- tion, and, Rehabilitation, 4, 283–289.
Smith-Hammond, C. A., New, K. C., Pietro-
bon, R., Curtis, D. J., Scharver, C. H., & Turner, D. A. (2004). Prospective analysis of incidence and risk factors of dyspha­gia in spine surgery patients: Compari­son of anterior cervical, posterior cervi­cal, and lumbar procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29(13), 1441–1446.
Song, H. R., Sarwark, J. F., Sauntry, S., &
Grant, J. (1996). Freeman-Sheldon syn­drome (whistling face syndrome) and cranio-vertebral junction malformation producing dysphagia and weight loss. Pediatric Neurosurgery, 24(5), 272–274.
Sugimoto, M., Hasegawa, T., Nishino, M.,
Sahara, S., Uotani, T., Ichikawa, H., & Furuta, T. (2016). Improvement of gas­troesophageal reflux disease in Japanese patients with spinal kyphotic deformity who underwent surgical spinal correc­tion. Digestive Endoscopy, 28(1), 50–58.
Teraguchi, M., Yoshimura, N., Hashizume,
H., Muraki, S., Yamada, H., Minamide A., . . . Yoshida, M. (2014). Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degen­eration over the entire spine in a popula­tion-based cohort: The Wakayama spine study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22(1), 104–110.
Tian, W., & Yu, J. (2013). The role of C2–C7
and O–C2 angle in the development of dysphagia after cervical spine surgery. Dysphagia, 28(2), 131–138.
Tortolani, P. J., Cunningham, B. W., Vigna,
F., Hu, N., Zorn, C. M., & McAfee, P. C. (2006). A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: Acadaveric study. Journal of Spinal Dis- orders and Techniques, 19, 312–317.
Urrutia, J., & Bono, C. M. (2009). Long-term
results of surgical treatment of dyspha­gia secondary to cervical diffuse idio-
19. SPINAL ABNORMALITIES IN DYSPHAGIA
https://t.me/medicina_free
451
pathic skeletal hyperostosis. The Spine Journal, 9(9), e13–e17.
von der Hoeh, N. H., Voelker, A., Jarvers,
J. S., Gulow, J., & Heyde, C. E. (2015). Results after the surgical treatment of anterior cervical hyperostosis caus­ing dysphagia. European Spine Journal, 224(Suppl. 4), S489–S493.
Wong, B. C., & Kinoshita, Y. (2006). System-
atic review on epidemiology of gastro­esophageal reflux disease in Asia. Clini- cal Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 4(4), 398–407.
Yamaguchi, T., Sugimoto, T., Yamauchi, M.,
Matsumori, Y., Tsutsumi, M., & Chihara, K. (2005). Multiple vertebral fractures are associated with refractory reflux esopha-
gitis in postmenopausal women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 23, 36–40.
Yoshimura, M., Nagahara, A., Ohtaka, K.,
Shimada, Y., Asaoka, D., Kurosawa, A., . . . Watanabe, S. (2008). Presence of ver­tebral fractures is highly associated with hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis in Japanese elderly people. Internal Medi- cine, 47, 1451–1455.
Ziegler, J. P., Davidson, K., Cooper, R. L.,
Garand, K. L., Nguyen, S. A., Yuen, E., Martin-Harris, B., & O’Rourke, A. K. (2021). Characterization of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery.
Advances in Communication and Swallow­ing, 24(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10
33/acs-210034
.32
https://t.me/medicina_free
Bonus Online-Only Chapter
https://t.me/medicina_free
Telehealth
Georgia A. Malandraki
www
The use of telehealth for the manage­ment of dysphagia has significantly increased worldwide since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase has presented many opportunities but also challenges for clinicians manag­ing adult and pediatric patients with dysphagia. In this chapter, the author will summarize the research evidence on dysphagia telemanagement and will share regulatory guidance, train-
ing components, and patient candi­dacy considerations. Then, telehealth and hybrid models of dysphagia management will be discussed as well as where we are now and what the future holds. The role of newer technologies (wearables, AI) as cata­lysts for the future of dysphagia care will also be introduced. This Bonus Online-Only Chapter can be accessed on the PluralPlus companion website.