Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_936_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
254
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
of cerebellar rTMS. A case report (Vasant et al., 2019), a pseudo-RCT (Zhong
et al., 2021), and an RCT (Dong et al.,
2022) found that it may be beneficial for
poststroke dysphagia. Overall, several
recent systematic reviews and metaanalyses suggested that rTMS has treatment benefits for dysphagia (Cheng et
al., 2021; Chiang et al., 2019; Liao et al.,
2017; Pisegna et al., 2016; Speyer, Sutt,
Bergström, Hamdy, Pommée, et al., 2022;
Yang et al., 2015). Importantly, Cheng
et al. (2021) found that bilateral rTMS
showed the greatest benefits among all
rTMS protocols. Moreover, the effects
of rTMS were the most significant during the first 2 weeks posttreatment, and
they diminished after 3 months.
Other studies suggested that rTMS
may be beneficial for dysphagia associated with PD and old age. A pilot
RCT with a crossover design found
that three types of neurostimulation,
including 1 Hz rTMS, 5 Hz rTMS, and
PES, were well tolerated by PD patients
(Sasegbon et al., 2021). However, the
clinical effects remain uncertain given
the small sample size. In another RCT
study with 33 PD patients, Khedr et
al. (2019) reported improved timing
of hyoid bone elevation and pharyngeal transit time after 10-day bilateral
20 Hz rTMS applied over hand motor
cortex. In elderly patients with dysphagia, Park et al. (2017) found that 5 Hz
rTMS improved swallowing function
and increased cortical activation during swallowing.
tDCS
The neurophysiological effects of tDCS
in the pathological population are
less well explored compared to rTMS.
Functionally, studies showed that unilateral tDCS reduces dysphagia severity (Kumar et al., 2011; Mao et al., 2021;
Sawan et al., 2020; Shigematsu et al.,
2013; Suntrup-Krueger et al., 2018; Yang
et al., 2012) and improves nutritional
status (Mao et al., 2021). By contrast,
the effects of bilateral tDCS were less
consistent. Two studies reported no
treatment effects of bilateral tDCS (Ahn
et al., 2017; Pingue et al., 2018). However, a study found that bilateral anodal
tDCS combined with balloon dilation
therapy and conventional swallowing
therapy improved swallowing function and pharyngoesophageal segment
opening (Wang et al., 2020). Another
study found that unilateral contralesional anodal tDCS and bilateral
tDCS improved swallowing function
in patients with unilateral and bilateral hemispheric stroke, respectively
(Sawan et al., 2020). Overall, systematic
reviews and meta-analyses found that
tDCS has modest but promising beneficial effects for patients with poststroke
dysphagia (Cheng et al., 2021; He et al.,
2022; Lin et al., 2021; Marchina et al.,
2021; Speyer, Sutt, Bergström, Hamdy,
Pommée, et al., 2022). Some studies suggested that tDCS may also be beneficial
for patients with dysphagia associated
with multiple sclerosis (MS) (Cosentino
et al., 2018; Restivo et al., 2019).
PES
Several RCT studies have shown that
PES can reduce the risk of penetration
and aspiration and improve swallowing function in patients with poststroke
dysphagia (Cabib et al., 2020b; Dziewas
et al., 2018; Fraser et al., 2002; Jayasekeran et al., 2010; Michou et al., 2014;
10. THE TREATMENT PLAN: BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES
https://t.me/medicina_free
255
Suntrup, Marian, et al., 2015), although
some reported no treatment effects
(Bath et al., 2016; Vasant et al., 2016).
Importantly, two large-scale studies
found that PES can facilitate decannulation in tracheostomized patients with
severe dysphagia (Dziewas et al., 2018;
Suntrup, Marian, et al., 2015). Overall,
current evidence suggested that PES is
beneficial for patients with poststroke
dysphagia, but its longer term (beyond
2 weeks) effects remain uncertain (Cheng
et al., 2021). Furthermore, studies suggested that PES may improve swallowing function in MS patients (Restivo et
al., 2013) and potentially in PD patients
(Sasegbon et al., 2021).
Limitations of Neuromodulation
Treatments
Despite their potential benefits for dysphagia, these neuromodulation techniques have not been widely adopted
in clinical practice due to some practical issues and limitations (Cheng &
Hamdy, 2021; Cheng, Sasegbon, et al.,
2022). Among these techniques, PES is
the only one that has received both EC
and (recent) FDA approval as a dysphagia treatment. For NIBS, small studies
and heterogeneous treatment protocols made drawing of definitive conclusions challenging, and their longterm (beyond 3 months) effects remain
poorly explored. Moreover, the operational costs can be high given that both
rTMS and tDCS require specialized
equipment and trained personnel to
operate (Cheng, Sasegbon, et al., 2022).
Finally, NIBS is limited by the response
variability. Studies have reported that
genetic predispositions (Hwang et al.,
2022; Raginis-Zborowska et al., 2019)
and neural activation before stimulation (Cheng et al., 2020) may contribute
to such variability. Response variability
may be minimized by preconditioning
the brain prior to stimulation (Cheng
et al., 2020), but further studies are
needed to fully elucidate the effects of
preconditioning in dysphagic patients.
CONCLUSION/FUTURE WORK
Neuromodulation treatments, including rTMS, tDCS, and PES, have shown
potential in facilitating dysphagia rehabilitation following stroke. Future work
should focus on the long-term treatment benefits and explore the treatment
effects in different pathological populations. Further studies should also identify strategies that maximize treatment
outcomes, for example, identification
of genetic biomarkers for treatment
responses or preconditioning of the
brain before treatment.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
SH is a board director, shareholder, and
chief scientific officer of Phagenesis
Ltd., a company that is involved in dysphagia treatment. IC and SH authored
some of the papers that were referenced
in this review.
REFERENCES
Ahn, Y. H., Sohn, H. J., Park, J. S., Ahn, T.
G., Shin, Y. B., Park, M., . . . Shin, Y. I.
(2017). Effect of bihemispheric anodal
transcranial direct current stimulation
for dysphagia in chronic stroke patients:
A randomized clinical trial. Journal of
256
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
Rehabilitation Medicine, 49(1), 30–35.
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2170
Antal, A., Alekseichuk, I., Bikson, M.,
Brockmoller, J., Brunoni, A. R., Chen,
R., . . . Paulus, W. (2017). Low intensity
transcranial electric stimulation: Safety,
ethical, legal regulatory and applica-
tion guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiol-
ogy, 128(9), 1774–1809. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001
Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., & Freeston, I. L.
(1985). Non-invasive magnetic stimula-
tion of human motor cortex. Lancet,
1(8437), 1106–1107. https://doi.org/10.10
16/s0140-6736(85)92413-4
Barker, A. T., & Shields, K. (2017). Tran-
scranial magnetic stimulation: Basic
principles and clinical applications in
migraine. Headache: The Journal of Head
and Face Pain, 57(3), 517–524. https://doi
.org/10.1111/head.13002
Bath, P. M., Scutt, P., Love, J., Clave, P.,
Cohen, D., Dziewas, R., . . . Swallow-
ing Treatment Using Pharyngeal Elec-
trical Stimulation Trial Investigators.
(2016). Pharyngeal electrical stimulation
for treatment of dysphagia in subacute
stroke: A randomized controlled trial.
Stroke, 47(6), 1562–1570. https://doi.org/
10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012455
Berardelli, A., Inghilleri, M., Rothwell, J. C.,
Romeo, S., Curra, A., Gilio, F., . . . Man-
fredi, M. (1998). Facilitation of muscle
evoked responses after repetitive cor-
tical stimulation in man. Experimental
Brain Research, 122(1), 79–84. https://doi
.org/10.1007/s002210050493
Cabib, C., Nascimento, W., Rofes, L., Arreola,
V., Tomsen, N., Mundet, L., . . . Ortega,
O. (2020a). Neurophysiological and bio-
mechanical evaluation of the mecha-
nisms which impair safety of swallow in
chronic post-stroke patients. Translational
Stroke Research, 11(1), 16–28. https://doi
.org/10.1007/s12975-019-00701-2
Cabib, C., Nascimento, W., Rofes, L.,
Arreola, V., Tomsen, N., Mundet, L.,
. . . Ortega, O. (2020b). Short-term neu-
rophysiological effects of sensory path-
way neurorehabilitation strategies on
chronic poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterology & Motility,
32(9), e13887. https://doi.org/10.1111/
nmo.13887
Cheng, I., & Hamdy, S. (2021). Current
perspectives on the benefits, risks, and
limitations of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for post-stroke dysphagia.
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 21(10),
1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1473
7175.2021.1974841
Cheng, I., Sasegbon, A., & Hamdy, S. (2021).
Effects of neurostimulation on poststroke dysphagia: A synthesis of current
evidence from randomized controlled
trials. Neuromodulation, 24(8), 1388–1401.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13327
Cheng, I., Sasegbon, A., & Hamdy, S. (2022).
Evaluating the therapeutic application
of neuromodulation in the human swallowing system. Dysphagia. https://doi
.org/ 10.1007/s00455-022-10528-z
Cheng, I., Scarlett, H., Zhang, M., & Hamdy,
S. (2020). Preconditioning human pharyngeal motor cortex enhances directional metaplasticity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Journal of Physiology, 598(22), 5213–5230.
https://doi.org/10.1113/JP279977
Cheng, I., Takahashi, K., Miller, A., &
Hamdy, S. (2022). Cerebral control of
swallowing: An update on neurobehavioral evidence. Journal of the Neurological
Sciences, 442, 120434. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jns.2022.120434
Cheng, I. K. Y., Chan, K. M. K., Wong, C. S.,
Li, L. S. W., Chiu, K. M. Y., Cheung, R.
T. F., & Yiu, E. M. L. (2017). Neuronavigated high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic
post-stroke dysphagia: A randomized
controlled study. Journal of Rehabilitation
Medicine, 49(6), 475–481. https://doi.org/
10.2340/16501977-2235
Chiang, C. F., Lin, M. T., Hsiao, M. Y., Yeh,
Y. C., Liang, Y. C., & Wang, T. G. (2019).
Comparative efficacy of noninvasive
neurostimulation therapies for acute and
10. THE TREATMENT PLAN: BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES
https://t.me/medicina_free
257
subacute poststroke dysphagia: A sys-
tematic review and network meta-
analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation, 100(4), 739–750.e734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09
.117
Cosentino, G., Gargano, R., Bonura, G.,
Realmuto, S., Tocco, E., Ragonese, P.,
. . . Salemi, G. (2018). Anodal tDCS of
the swallowing motor cortex for treat-
ment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis:
A pilot open-label study. Neurological
Sciences, 39(8), 1471–1473. https://doi
.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3443-x
Doeltgen, S. H., Rigney, L., Cock, C., &
Omari, T. (2018). Effects of cortical anodal
transcranial direct current stimulation
on swallowing biomechanics. Neurogas-
troenterology & Motility, 30(11), e13434.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13434
Dong, L.-h., Pan, X., Wang, Y., Bai, G., Han,
C., Wang, Q., & Meng, P. (2022). High-
frequency cerebellar rTMS improves
the swallowing function of patients
with dysphagia after brainstem stroke.
Neural Plasticity, 2022, 1–9. https://doi
.org/10.1155/2022/6259693
Dziewas, R., Stellato, R., van der Tweel,
I., Walther, E., Werner, C. J., Braun, T.,
. . . PHAST-TRAC Investigators. (2018).
Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for
early decannulation in tracheotomised
patients with neurogenic dysphagia after
stroke (PHAST-TRAC): A prospective,
single-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet
Neurology, 17(10), 849–859. https://doi
.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30255-2
Dziewas, R., Teismann, I. K., Suntrup, S.,
Schiffbauer, H., Steinstraeter, O., War-
necke, T., . . . Pantev, C. (2009). Cortical
compensation associated with dyspha-
gia caused by selective degeneration
of bulbar motor neurons. Human Brain
Mapping, 30(4), 1352–1360. https://doi
.org/10.1002/hbm.20603
Fraser, C., Power, M., Hamdy, S., Rothwell,
J., Hobday, D., Hollander, I., . . . Thomp-
son, D. (2002). Driving plasticity in
human adult motor cortex is associated
with improved motor function after brain
injury. Neuron, 34(5), 831–840. https://
doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00705-5
Fraser, C., Rothwell, J., Power, M., Hobson,
A., Thompson, D., & Hamdy, S. (2003).
Differential changes in human pharyngoesophageal motor excitability induced
by swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation,
and anesthesia. American Journal of Phys-
iology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 285(1), G137–G144. https://doi.org/
10.1152/ajpgi.00399.2002
Fregni, F., Nitsche, M. A., Loo, C. K., Brun-
oni, A. R., Marangolo, P., Leite, J., . . .
Paik, N. J. (2015). Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use
of transcranial direct current stimulation
(tDCS): Review and recommendations
from an expert panel. Clinical Research and
Regulatory Affairs, 32(1), 22–35. https://
doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2015.980944
Gow, D., Rothwell, J., Hobson, A., Thomp-
son, D., & Hamdy, S. (2004). Induction
of long-term plasticity in human swallowing motor cortex following repetitive cortical stimulation. Clinical Neuro-
physiology, 115(5), 1044–1051. https://doi
.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.001
Hamdy, S., Aziz, Q., Rothwell, J. C., Power,
M., Singh, K. D., Nicholson, D. A., . . .
Thompson, D. G. (1998). Recovery of
swallowing after dysphagic stroke relates
to functional reorganization in the intact
motor cortex. Gastroenterology, 115(5),
1104–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s00
16-5085(98)70081-2
Hamdy, S., Aziz, Q., Rothwell, J. C., Singh,
K. D., Barlow, J., Hughes, D. G., . . .
Thompson, D. G. (1996). The cortical
topography of human swallowing musculature in health and disease. Nature
Medicine, 2(11), 1217–1224. https://doi
.org/10.1038/nm1196-1217
Hamdy, S., Rothwell, J. C., Aziz, Q., Singh,
K. D., & Thompson, D. G. (1998). Longterm reorganization of human motor
cortex driven by short-term sensory
stimulation. Nature Neuroscience, 1(1),
64–68.
258
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
He, K., Wu, L., Huang, Y., Chen, Q., Qiu,
B., Liang, K., & Ma, R. (2022). Efficacy
and safety of transcranial direct current
stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia:
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(9), 2297.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092297
Hoogendam, J. M., Ramakers, G. M., & Di
Lazzaro, V. (2010). Physiology of repeti-
tive transcranial magnetic stimulation of
the human brain. Brain Stimulation, 3(2),
95–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs
.2009.10.005
Huang, Y. Z., Chen, R. S., Rothwell, J. C.,
& Wen, H. Y. (2007). The after-effect of
human theta burst stimulation is NMDA
receptor dependent. Clinical Neurophysi-
ology, 118(5), 1028–1032. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.021
Hwang, H., Han, Y., Park, G.-Y., Lee, S.,
Park, H.-Y., & Im, S. (2022). Role of cat-
echol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met
polymorphism on transcranial direct
current stimulation in swallowing. Jour-
nal of Personalized Medicine, 12(3), 488.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030488
Jayasekeran, V., Rothwell, J., & Hamdy, S.
(2011). Non-invasive magnetic stimula-
tion of the human cerebellum facilitates
cortico-bulbar projections in the swal-
lowing motor system. Neurogastroenter-
ology & Motility, 23(9), 831-e341. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01747.x
Jayasekeran, V., Singh, S., Tyrrell, P., Michou,
E., Jefferson, S., Mistry, S., . . . Hamdy, S.
(2010). Adjunctive functional pharyngeal
electrical stimulation reverses swallow-
ing disability after brain lesions. Gastro-
enterology, 138(5), 1737–1746. https://doi
.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.052
Jefferson, S., Mistry, S., Michou, E., Singh,
S., Rothwell, J. C., & Hamdy, S. (2009).
Reversal of a virtual lesion in human pha-
ryngeal motor cortex by high frequency
contralesional brain stimulation. Gastro-
enterology, 137(3), 841–849.e841. https://
doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.056
Jefferson, S., Mistry, S., Singh, S., Rothwell,
J., & Hamdy, S. (2009). Characterizing
the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal
motor cortex. American Journal of Physi-
ology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology,
297(6), G1035–G1040. https://doi.org/
10.1152/ajpgi.00294.2009
Khedr, E. M., Abo-Elfetoh, N., & Rothwell,
J. C. (2009). Treatment of post-stroke
dysphagia with repetitive transcranial
magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurologica
Scandinavica, 119(3), 155–161. https://doi
.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01093.x
Khedr, E. M., Mohamed, K. O., Soliman,
R. K., Hassan, A. M. M., & Rothwell, J.
C. (2019). The effect of high-frequency
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on advancing Parkinson’s disease
with dysphagia: Double blind randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabilitation and
Neural Repair, 33(6), 442–452. https://doi
.org/10.1177/1545968319847968
Kumar, S., Wagner, C. W., Frayne, C., Zhu,
L., Selim, M., Feng, W., & Schlaug, G.
(2011). Noninvasive brain stimulation
may improve stroke-related dysphagia:
A pilot study. Stroke, 42(4), 1035–1040.
https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha
.602128
Liao, X., Xing, G., Guo, Z., Jin, Y., Tang,
Q., He, B., . . . Mu, Q. (2017). Repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation as an
alternative therapy for dysphagia after
stroke: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(3),
289–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/
215516644771
Liebetanz, D., Nitsche, M. A., Tergau, F.,
& Paulus, W. (2002). Pharmacological
approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC‐stimulation‐induced after‐
effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain, 125(10), 2238–2247. https://doi
.org/10.1093/brain/awf238
Lim, K. B., Lee, H. J., Yoo, J., & Kwon, Y. G.
(2014). Effect of low-frequency rTMS and
NMES on subacute unilateral hemispheric
stroke with dysphagia. Annals of Rehabili-
tation Medicine, 38(5), 592–602. https://doi
.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38 .5.592
.110
0269
10. THE TREATMENT PLAN: BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES
https://t.me/medicina_free
259
Lin, Q., Lin, S.-f., Ke, X.-h., Jia, X.-F., &
Huang, D.-B. (2021). A systematic review
and meta-analysis on the effectiveness
of transcranial direct current stimula-
tion (tDCS) on swallowing function of
post-stroke patients. American Journal of
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 268,
293–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM
.0000000000001845
Magara, J., Michou, E., Raginis-Zborowska,
A., Inoue, M., & Hamdy, S. (2016).
Exploring the effects of synchronous
pharyngeal electrical stimulation with
swallowing carbonated water on corti-
cal excitability in the human pharyngeal
motor system. Neurogastroenterology &
Motility, 28(9), 1391–1400. https://doi
.org/ 10.1111/nmo.12839
Mao, H., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., Gan, L., Ni, J., Liu,
L., & Xiao, Z. (2021). Clinical study
on swallowing function of brainstem
stroke by tDCS. Neurological Sciences,
43, 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10072-021-05247-6
Marchina, S., Pisegna, J. M., Massaro, J. M.,
Langmore, S. E., McVey, C., Wang, J., &
Kumar, S. (2021). Transcranial direct cur-
rent stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia:
A systematic review and meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials. Journal
of Neurology, 268(1), 293–304. https://doi
.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10142-9
Michou, E., Mistry, S., Jefferson, S., Tyr-
rell, P., & Hamdy, S. (2014). Character-
izing the mechanisms of central and
peripheral forms of neurostimulation in
chronic dysphagic stroke patients. Brain
Stimulation, 7(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.brs.2013.09.005
Mistry, S., Verin, E., Singh, S., Jefferson,
S., Rothwell, J. C., Thompson, D. G., &
Hamdy, S. (2007). Unilateral suppression
of pharyngeal motor cortex to repeti-
tive transcranial magnetic stimulation
reveals functional asymmetry in the
hemispheric projections to human swal-
lowing. Journal of Physiology, 585(Pt.2),
525–538. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphys
iol.2007.144592
Muhle, P., Suntrup-Krueger, S., Bittner, S.,
Ruck, T., Claus, I., Marian, T., . . . Meuth,
S. G. (2017). Increase of substance P concentration in saliva after pharyngeal electrical stimulation in severely dysphagic
stroke patients: An indicator of decannulation success? Neurosignals, 25(1), 74–87.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000482002
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excit-
ability changes induced in the human
motor cortex by weak transcranial direct
current stimulation. Journal of Physiology,
527(Pt. 3), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.11
11/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001). Sus-
tained excitability elevations induced by
transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation
in humans. Neurology, 57(10), 1899–1901.
https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899
Park, J. W., Oh, J. C., Lee, J. W., Yeo, J. S., &
Ryu, K. H. (2013). The effect of 5Hz highfrequency rTMS over contralesional pharyngeal motor cortex in post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: A randomized
controlled study. Neurogastroenterology
& Motility, 25(4), 324–e250. https://doi
.org/10.1111/nmo.12063
Park, J. W., Sim, G. J., Kim, H. J., Yeo, J.
S., Hong, H. J., & Kwon, B. S. (2017).
Changes of cortical activation in swallowing following high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
in older adults. Neurogastroenterology &
Motility, 29(11), 1–5. https://doi.org/
.1111/nmo.13123
Pascual-Leone, A., Tormos, J. M., Keenan, J.,
Tarazona, F., Canete, C., & Catala, M. D.
(1998). Study and modulation of human
cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Clinical Neuro-
physiology, 15(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/
10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005
Pingue, V., Priori, A., Malovini, A., & Pista-
rini, C. (2018). Dual transcranial direct
current stimulation for poststroke dysphagia: A randomized controlled trial.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair,
32(6–7), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.11
77/ 1545968318782743
10
260
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
Pisegna, J. M., Kaneoka, A., Pearson, W. G.,
Jr., Kumar, S., & Langmore, S. E. (2016).
Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
on post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic
review and meta-analysis of random-
ized controlled trials. Clinical Neurophys-
iology, 127(1), 956–968. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.069
Priori, A. (2003). Brain polarization in
humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for
prolonged non-invasive modulation of
brain excitability. Clinical Neurophysiol-
ogy, 114(4), 589–595. https://doi.org/
10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00437-6
Radman, T., Ramos, R. L., Brumberg, J. C.,
& Bikson, M. (2009). Role of cortical cell
type and morphology in subthreshold
and suprathreshold uniform electric
field stimulation in vitro. Brain Stimula-
tion, 2(4), 215–228.e213. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007
Raginis-Zborowska, A., Cheng, I., Pendle-
ton, N., Payton, A., Ollier, W., Michou, E.,
& Hamdy, S. (2019). Genetic influences
on the variability of response to repeti-
tive transcranial magnetic stimulation in
human pharyngeal motor cortex. Neuro-
gastroenterology & Motility, 31(7), e13612.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13612
Restivo, D. A., Alfonsi, E., Casabona, A.,
Hamdy, S., Tassorelli, C., Panebianco, M.,
. . . Pavone, A. (2019). A pilot study on
the efficacy of transcranial direct current
stimulation applied to the pharyngeal
motor cortex for dysphagia associated
with brainstem involvement in multiple
sclerosis. Clinical Neurophysiology, 130(6),
1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
.clin ph.2019.04.003
Restivo, D. A., Casabona, A., Centonze, D.,
Marchese-Ragona, R., Maimone, D., &
Pavone, A. (2013). Pharyngeal electri-
cal stimulation for dysphagia associated
with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study.
Brain Stimulation, 6(3), 418–423. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.001
Rossi, S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Bikson,
M., Brewer, C., Brockmöller, J., . . . Das-
kalakis, J. D. (2020). Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy
subjects and patient populations, with
updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert guidelines. Clinical
Neurophysiology, 1(132), 269–306. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003
Russo, C., Souza Carneiro, M. I., Bolognini,
N., & Fregni, F. (2017). Safety review of
transcranial direct current stimulation in
stroke. Neuromodulation, 20(3), 215–222.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12574
Sasegbon, A., Hammerbeck, U., Michou, E.,
Cheng, I., Zhang, M., James, C., & Hamdy,
S. (2021). A feasibility pilot study of the
effects of neurostimulation on dysphagia
recovery in Parkinson’s disease. AMRC
Open Research, 3, 19. https://doi.org/10
.12688/amrcopenres.13007.1
Sasegbon, A., Watanabe, M., Simons, A.,
Michou, E., Vasant, D. H., Magara, J.,
. . . Hamdy, S. (2019). Cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
restores pharyngeal brain activity and
swallowing behaviour after disruption
by a cortical virtual lesion. Journal of
Physiology, 597(9), 2533–2546. https://
doi.org/10.1113/JP277545
Sawan, S. A. E., Reda, A. M., Kamel, A. H., &
Ali, M. A. M. (2020). Transcranial direct
current stimulation (tDCS): Its effect on
improving dysphagia in stroke patients.
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 56(1), 1–7. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s41983-020-00246-4
Shigematsu, T., Fujishima, I., & Ohno, K.
(2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves swallowing function
in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and
Neural Repair, 27(4), 363–369. https://doi
.org/10.1177/1545968312474116
Speyer, R., Sutt, A. L., Bergström, L., Hamdy,
S., Heijnen, B. J., Remijn, L., . . . Cordier, R.
(2022). Neurostimulation in people with
oropharyngeal dysphagia: A systematic
review and meta-analyses of randomised
controlled trials — Part I: Pharyngeal and
neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
10. THE TREATMENT PLAN: BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES
https://t.me/medicina_free
261
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(3), 1–51.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm
Speyer, R., Sutt, A. L., Bergström, L.,
Hamdy, S., Pommée, T., Balaguer, M., . . .
Cordier, R. (2022). Neurostimulation in
people with oropharyngeal dysphagia:
A systematic review and meta-analysis
of randomised controlled trials
II: Brain neurostimulation. Journal of
Clinical Medicine, 11(4), 993. https://doi
.org/10.3390/jcm11040993
Stefan, K., Kunesch, E., Benecke, R., Cohen,
L. G., & Classen, J. (2002). Mechanisms
of enhancement of human motor cortex
excitability induced by interventional
paired associative stimulation. Journal of
Physiology, 543(Pt. 2), 699–708. https://
doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.023317
Suntrup‐Krueger, S., Bittner, S., Recker, S.,
Meuth, S., Warnecke, T., Suttrup, I., . . .
Dziewas, R. (2016). Electrical pharyngeal
stimulation increases substance P level in
saliva. Neurogastroenterology & Motility,
28(6), 855–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/
nmo.12783
Suntrup-Krueger, S., Ringmaier, C.,
Muhle, P., Wollbrink, A., Kemmling, A.,
Hanning, U., . . . Dziewas, R. (2018). Ran-
domized trial of transcranial direct cur-
rent stimulation for poststroke dyspha-
gia. Annals of Neurology, 83(2), 328–340.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25151
Suntrup, S., Marian, T., Schroder, J. B., Sut-
trup, I., Muhle, P., Oelenberg, S., . . .
Dziewas, R. (2015). Electrical pharyngeal
stimulation for dysphagia treatment in
tracheotomized stroke patients: A ran-
domized controlled trial. Intensive Care
Medicine, 41(9), 1629–1637. https://doi
.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3897-8
Suntrup, S., Teismann, I., Bejer, J., Suttrup,
I., Winkels, M., Mehler, D., . . . War-
necke, T. (2013). Evidence for adaptive
cortical changes in swallowing in Parkin-
son’s disease. Brain, 136(Pt. 3), 726–738.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt004
Suntrup, S., Teismann, I., Wollbrink, A.,
Winkels, M., Warnecke, T., Floel, A.,
11030776
— Part
. . . Dziewas, R. (2013). Magnetoencephalographic evidence for the modulation
of cortical swallowing processing by
cranial direct current stimulation.
trans
Neuroimage, 83, 346–354. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.055
Suntrup, S., Teismann, I. K., Wollbrink, A.,
Winkels, M., Warnecke, T., Pantev, C., &
Dziewas, R. (2015). Pharyngeal electrical
stimulation can modulate swallowing in
cortical processing and behavior — Magnetoencephalographic evidence. Neuro
image, 104, 117–124. https://doi.org/ 10
.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.016
Tarameshlu, M., Ansari, N. N., Ghelichi, L.,
& Jalaei, S. (2019). The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
combined with traditional dysphagia
therapy on poststroke dysphagia: A pilot
double-blinded randomized-controlled
trial. International Journal of Rehabilita-
tion Research, 42(2), 133–138. https://doi
.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000336
Terao, Y., & Ugawa, Y. (2002). Basic mecha-
nisms of TMS. Journal of Clinical Neuro-
physiology, 19(4), 322–343. https://doi.
org/
10.1097/00004691-200208000-00006
Unluer, N. O., Temucin, C. M., Demir, N.,
Serel Arslan, S., & Karaduman, A. A.
(2019). Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
on swallowing function and quality of
life of post-stroke patients. Dysphagia,
34(3), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00455-018-09965-6
Vasant, D. H., Michou, E., Mistry, S., Roth-
well, J. C., & Hamdy, S. (2015). Highfrequency focal repetitive cerebellar
stimulation induces prolonged increases
in human pharyngeal motor cortex excitability. Journal of Physiology, 593(22), 4963–
4977. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270817
Vasant, D. H., Michou, E., O’Leary, N., Vail,
A., Mistry, S., Hamdy, S., & Greater Manchester Stroke Research Network. (2016).
Pharyngeal electrical stimulation in dysphagia poststroke: A prospective, randomized single-blinded interventional
-
262
https://t.me/medicina_free
DYSPHAGIA ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING: A TEAM APPROACH
study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural
Repair, 30(9), 866–875. https://doi.org/
10.1177/1545968316639129
Vasant, D. H., Mistry, S., Michou, E., Jef-
ferson, S., Rothwell, J. C., & Hamdy, S.
(2014). Transcranial direct current stim-
ulation reverses neurophysiological and
behavioural effects of focal inhibition
of human pharyngeal motor cortex on
swallowing. Journal of Physiology, 592(4),
695–709. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphys
iol.2013.263475
Vasant, D. H., Sasegbon, A., Michou, E.,
Smith, C., & Hamdy, S. (2019). Rapid
improvement in brain and swallowing
behavior induced by cerebellar repeti-
tive transcranial magnetic stimulation
in poststroke dysphagia: A single patient
case-controlled study. Neurogastroenterol-
ogy & Motility, 31(7), e13609. https://doi
.org/10.1111/nmo.13609
Wang, Z. Y., Chen, J. M., Lin, Z. K., & Ni,
G. X. (2020). Transcranial direct current
stimulation improves the swallowing
function in patients with cricopharyn-
geal muscle dysfunction following a
brainstem stroke. Neurological Sciences,
41(3), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10072-019-04120-x
Yang, E. J., Baek, S. R., Shin, J., Lim, J. Y.,
Jang, H. J., Kim, Y. K., & Paik, N. J. (2012).
Effects of transcranial direct current
stimulation (tDCS) on post-stroke dys-
phagia. Restorative Neurology and Neuro-
science, 30(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/
10.3233/RNN-2012-110213
Yang, S. N., Pyun, S. B., Kim, H. J., Ahn, H.
S., & Rhyu, B. J. (2015). Effectiveness of
non-invasive brain stimulation in dysphagia subsequent to stroke: A systemic
review and meta-analysis. Dysphagia,
30(4), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00455-015-9619-0
Zhang, C., Zheng, X., Lu, R., Yun, W., Yun,
H., & Zhou, X. (2019). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with neuromuscular electrical
stimulation for treatment of post-stroke
dysphagia. Journal of International Medi-
cal Research, 47(2), 662–672. https://doi
.org/10.1177/0300060518807340
Zhao, S., Dou, Z., Wei, X., Li, J., Dai,
M., Wang, Y., . . . He, H. (2015). Taskconcurrent anodal tDCS modulates bilateral plasticity in the human suprahyoid
motor cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuro-
science, 9, 370. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fnhum.2015.00370
Zhong, L., Rao, J., Wang, J., Li, F., Peng, Y.,
Liu, H., . . . Wang, P. (2021). Repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation at different sites for dysphagia after stroke:
Arandomized, observer-blind clinical trial.
Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 860. https://doi
.org/10.3389/fneur.2021 .625683
The Treatment Plan: Medical
https://t.me/medicina_free
and Surgical Therapies
Katherine A. Kendall
MEDICAL THERAPIES
Medical therapies designed specifically
for the treatment of dysphagia from
any cause have not been developed.
Rather, therapies designed to treat the
underlying medical condition resulting
in dysphagia are the mainstay of medical therapy. It is, therefore, extremely
important to identify the etiology of the
dysphagia in any given patient so that
appropriate medical therapy, aimed at
treating the underlying cause of the
dysphagia, can be instituted.
Neuromuscular Disease
When a neuromuscular disease is the
etiology of the dysphagia, it must be
ascertained if the medical therapy
appropriate for treating the condition
has been maximized. For any patient
with dysphagia, a review of other
medications prescribed for the patient
will help determine if any of them may
contribute to dysphagia. Many drugs
prescribed for neuromuscular disease
affect the cholinergic nervous system
and are known to have an effect on
swallowing (see Chapter 2). Therefore,
the same drugs prescribed to treat the
neuromuscular disease may have a deleterious effect on swallowing. A balance
between therapeutic benefit and side
effects of medications must be achieved.
In several types of neuromuscular
disease, cricopharyngeal achalasia, or
failure of the cricopharyngeus muscle
to relax, has been commonly identified.
In many of these patients, cricopharyngeal myotomy may be considered. (See
below for further discussion of cricopharyngeal myotomy.)
Gastroesophageal Reflux (GERD)
Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is the
result of the reflux of gastric contents
263
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана